HAIG    REPORT:    GoTo [on this page] HaigReport's Menu Of Themes of Menus for our thousands of pages
TIPS for
Navigating HaigReport:  If you arrived at this page, referred from a Search Engine such as Google et al, your URL link will NOT have an #Anchor/Marker to take you to the relevant spot on this page.  In that case, we do recommend that you view our "Latest HaigReport Promotions" of recent additions to our websites, by Clicking Here.  It will open in a new Browser window. 

If
you Click Here, you will be taken, usually, to the specific Unique Content on this page, for which you were most likely seeking.  However, if you Click Here, you will be taken to the Top of the HaigReport Header, below on this page. 

However, if you have arrived at this page from another of our Website pages, your link will usually have an #Anchor, also called a marker, which will take you to the intended specific spot on the page where that marker is positioned.  In fact, it will probably take you there prior to your reading this.  Moving to that Anchor is the final step in the loading of this page.

 HAIG     REPORT:   Is now on  twitter  [from 2nd June, 2013]  link to us HERE on twitter     See our Twitter Strategy    

 HAIG    REPORT:  SEE: Russell Mathews' COMMENTARY:    Russell Mathews' [BCom BSc LLB & BA] current TOPICAL commentary on GOVERNMENT, politics & business     Press to READ       Press for MENU   

 HAIG    REPORT:    WANTED:
Healthy female "dog" to breed with Parson Russell Terrier, to produce ASSISTANCE DOGS.   Rochedale South QLD 4123
I wish to breed from my Parson Russell Terrier. He is a trained assistance dog. He has a wonderful nature. The breed of his mate could be varied or a cross; eg Parson Russell Terrier, Jack Russell Terrier, Beagle, Bull Terrier, Bull mastiff, Staffy, and/or Fox Terrier plus many others. She does not need to be "pedigreed". I am very protective of my dogs. She will become very valuable to me and become one of my assistance "dogs". If we can assist each other, please contact me on my contact form, including your email address and your landline phone number so I can phone you to discuss. 

Because I am disabled and have an LLB [so therefore understand the Law surrounding disabilities and assistance dogs] I am now branching out to providing Assistance dogs to disabled persons [even if disabled in only a minor way and so not even realizing it]. This is not a business proposition but rather just a very necessary service I can offer to the community.
Many people have a disability and do not realize their ailment or "problem" is by law, the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA], classified as a "disability". This is especially so for people getting on in years, and who have a dog, and are maybe moving to accommodation where they are told they cannot take their dog. In a majority of cases, those people cannot be legally forced to surrender their animal/dog.
I will be assisting those person who already have dogs, but are being forced, unlawfully, to dispose of them because maybe they are moving accommodation. I can train your existing dogs to be assistance dogs and provide the documentation as required by the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA]. I do not intend to charge for this, but just maybe cover some marginal costs.

    View the Latest    HAIG     REPORT Promotions:  in this Scrolling Window, or OPEN in new browser:     

 Click here  to Learn how your Personalized Alert Notice [IMMEDIATELY ABOVE] is prepared by our HAIG Unique Visitor Algorithm: [HUVA] or  Click here  to see your UNIQUE Personalized Alert Notice in a new Browser Window.


Index: Corrupt Police Rantala Magistrates Court Transcripts, Day 10:


My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies. The HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies.

   It is Our legal, social and moral DUTY to EXPOSE CRIME, FRAUD & CORRUPTION plus Lying and Hypocrisy in Public Life, Including Judges & magistrates 
 

Fraud, Corruption & attempted  MURDER 
covered-up by Queensland police, EXPOSED 

header: Rhodes BLOOD MONEY Scholarship Scandal & Fraud:

Transcripts: Corrupt Police in Court:
Australian Government Steals Disabled Old Man's home for The University of Queensland to punish Disabled Old Man for being DISABLED

commonheader.php

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.  
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      EMAIL us anytime:  Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay. 

xt of Transcript

Corrupt Police Rantala, Brisbane Magistrates Court, 'Mention', 8th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php includedMenuMagistratesCourtsCorruptPoliceRantalaTranscripts.php

Menu: Truncated Committal Hearing re Corrupt Police Henri Elias Rantala,

Brisbane Magistrates Court, 24th, 25th & 28th June, 2010 coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

Transcripts of Hearing days on which witnesses gave evidence, with Summaries as Menus of Anchors/Markers:

  1. Summary of this Case of Fraud by Queensland Police &Commonwealth DPP
  2. Index:
  3. *Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  4. *Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  5. *Day 3: 28th June, 2010

Transcripts of related Mentions, after the truncation of the committal; ['*' preceding links below means that that transcript is preceded by  a 'Summary' which is a Menu of Anchors/Markers:]

  1. Day 00:   9th June, 2010
  2. *Day 04: 29th June, 2010
  3. *Day 05: 30th June, 2010
  4. *Day 06:     1st July, 2010
  5. *Day 07:    9th July, 2010
  6. *Day 08: 10th August, 2010
  7. *Day 09:    1st September, 2010
  8. *Day 10:   8th September, 2010
  9.  * Day 11: 15th September, 2010
  10. Day 12: 22th September, 2010
  11. Day 13: 24th September, 2010

Transcripts for Pre-Trial Mentions, coram various magistrates:

  1. Day A: 14th September, 2009
  2. Day B: 2nd November, 2009
  3. Day C: 25th January, 2010
  4. Day D: 15th March, 2010.

MenuAnchorsDayXX

Future Summary of this Transcript  [which appears below] of Brisbane Magistrates Court, MENTION on 8th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck.

  1. #Corrupt_Rantala_Brisbane_Magistrates_Co
  2. #Day Of Hearing Title
  3. #Day Of Month
  4. #Defendant Name
  5. #Defendant Title
  6. #Indictment Number
  7. #Indictment Year
  8. #Judge Surname
  9. #Judge Title
  10. #Jurisdiction
  11. #Location
  12. #Month
  13. #Plaintiff Name
  14. #Plaintiff Title
  15. #Year
  16. #Kluck_appoints_Clare_Jarvis_to_be_the_recorder
  17. #Klutz Magistrate Paul M Kluck Quickly Sets The Stage With False Fact That No Response From Me
  18. #My Editorial Listing The Link To My Actual Email Response Two Days Earlier    ====>>>    /My Actual Email Sent TWO DAYS Earlier Kluck  Hunter Lied And Denied.php#Two Days Earlier
  19. Shyster Shane Hunter LaterAdmits in Writing that it was received when sent. & in particular Click HERE & Click HERE
  20. #Kluck Quickly Obtains Statement From Shyster Shane Of No Response From Me So Shyster Shane Hunter Cannot Retract
  21. #Shyster Shane Is Now Locked Into That Lie
  22. #Klutz Kluck Traps Shyster Shane Hunter In The Lie
  23. #Ms A For Accommodating Agreeable Ainsthorpe Has Given Wrong Advice To Shyster Shane Hunter Of Purpose Of Today
  24. #Shyster Shane Now Questions The False Fact He Has Just Confirmed That I Had Not Responded When In Fact I Had
  25. #Klutz Kluck Now Returns To His Real Agenda To Rid Himself Of This Problem
  26. #EDITORIAL_Of Reason Klutz Kluck Wants To Be Rid Of This Case
  27. #After Previously Refusing Accommodation Of My Special Needs Klutz Kluck Now Admits Justice Is Not Being Done
  28. #Klutz Kluck Tries To Blame Me For His Denial Of My Special Needs By Saying I Am Not Doing Justice To Myself
  29. #Shyster Shane Refers To Section 613 Queensland Criminal Code
  30. #Kluck States He Thinks I Have A Neurological Impairment
  31. #Shyster Shane Now Mentions My Resounding Victory In The Court Of Appeal On 20th July 2010
  32. #Shyster Shane Hunter States I Appeared In The Court Of Appeal To Argue My Appeal Albeit By Telephone
  33. #Klutz Kluck States He Would Not Like Me To Be Held In Custody
  34. #And Brought Before The Court Each  Day
  35. #Shyster Shane Believes I Should Be Present At Least By Phone To Hear His Submission On Whether I Should Be Refered To The District Court
  36. #Shyster Shane States That I Am Refusing To Come To Court
  37. #Kluck The Klutz States He Has Placed Each And Every Email Of Mine On The Record
  38. #Kluck Qualifies That To The Emails Of Which He Knows So No Doubt A Reference To Todays Of Which He Is Feigning Ignorance
  39. #Shyster Shane Now Canvasses The Possibility Of My Being Excluded From My Trial BECAUSE _I _AM _DISABLED. _THAT _IS _AN _OUTRAGE
  40. #Klutz Kluck Then Considers If He Could Exclude Me From The Committal Hearing For Contempt Of Court
  41. #Klutz Kluck Admits That Is A Drastic Step In The Case Of Disability But Still Considered It
  42. #Klutz Kluck Says No Normal Person Would Be Behaving Like This So Something Is Wrong
  43. #Klutz Kluck Admits He Cannot Insist On My Being Legally Represented
  44. #Kluts Kluck Admits He Cannot Insist On My Having A McKenzie Friend
  45. #Klutz Kluck Is Perplexed
  46. #Klutz Kluck Says Most Normal Persons Would Show Respect For The Court And Appear  
  47. #Shyster Shane Again Mentions Case Of My Friend Megumi Ogawa Who Was Denied Justice In The District Court
  48. #Shyster Shane Perpetuates The Lie That Threats Were Made To The Federal Court Registry
  49. #Shyster Shane Hunter Wants Me Formally Threatened By The Court With Arrest
  50. #Kluck The Klutz Advises That In The Past I Have Taken Such Threats As Intimidation
  51. #Kluck The Klutz Advises That In The Past I Have Taken Such As Not Respecting My Disability
  52. #Kluck The Klutz States That In The Past I Have Gone Off On Another Stream Of Abusive Emails
  53. #Klutz Kluck Decides He Should Ask Me If I Am Raising The Question Of My Fitness To Be Tried
  54. #Klutz Kluck Stays That I Write Back And Say I Am Fit  To Be Tried And I Am Going To Win [I am unaware of saying that.]
  55. #Klutz Kluck Says That As I Am Not Legally Represented The Question Of My Fitness To Be Tried Must Be Raised By Me Or Shyster Shane
  56. #Klutz Kluck Then States That The Court Can Think For Itself
  57. #This Suggests That Klutz Kluck Thinks He Can Extend The Legislation
  58. #Shyster Shane Hunter Raises The Relevant Precedent Case On Fitness To Stand Trial Of R v Presser
  59. #Kluck Thinks Presser Case Considers Mental And Physical DISABILITIES
  60. #Shyster Shane Then Presumes To Tell Klutz Kluck What Should Now Occur
  61. #Klutz Kluick Asks Shyster Shane If An Email Response From Me Will Be Sufficient Response
  62. #Shyster Shane Advises That An Email Response From Me Will Be Sufficient Response
  63. #Shyster Shane And Klutz Kluck Want My Views On The Question Of My Fitness To Stand Trial Emailed To Them
  64. #Shyster Shane Asks If Bail Act Provision Of Remanding Me In Custody For The Purpose Of A Psychiatriatric Examination Might Be Appropriate
  65. #Shyster Shane And Klutz Kluck Show Their Ignorance Of What They Are Doing In Discussion
  66. #These Two Rare Talents Thank Each Other Yet Again


includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php includedCDDMenuAvengerRevengeRetribution.php includedSummaryCaseFraudPoliceAndCDPP.php

Summary of the case by the Criminal, corrupt & FRAUDULENT Qld police AGAINST Disabled Old Man

This is the case where corrupt police and a corrupt Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, attempt to use brute force, of police arrest and harassment to silence the disabled old man, to conceal how the Queensland police performed an Armed Robbery on him to Assist the Queensland Government defraud the disabled old man of his house and land that he owned and which was his home.

The disabled old man has brain damage caused by severe head injury when a teenager.  That affects his ability to "work" for any but short time periods.  He is able to concentrate for only short periods. This is near impossible for a casual observer to notice.  He quickly becomes fatigued and if he is forced to continue to try to concentrate, that results in mental exhaustion.  On the first day of hearing, knowing the disabled old man's disability and the nature of it, Magistrate Klutz ridiculed the disabled old man, even though the disabled old man was trying hard to accommodate what the Magistrate desired.   CLEARLY, THE DISABLED OLD MAN MUST REFUSE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS, UNLESS AND UNTIL HIS SPECIAL NEEDS CONSEQUENT UPON HIS DISABILITIES ARE FULLY ACCOMMODATED.   THIS IS ESSENTIAL IF HE IS TO RECEIVE DUE PROCESS.  THE ONUS IS UPON THE MAGISTRATE, JUDGE AND DECISION MAKER, TO ENSURE THAT THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS EXTENDED DUE PROCESS aka NATURAL JUSTICE.

THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS HAPPY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS PROVIDED HE RECEIVES DUE PROCESS. 

The real crux of this fraud upon the disabled old man and concurrently, UPON THE JUSTICE AND LEGAL SYSTEM OF QUEENSLAND AND AUSTRALIA, is that this disabled old man is being prosecuted in the most contemptuous way, to continue the EXPLOITATION OF HIS BEING DISABLED BY THE QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT, in that the Queensland Government, defrauded/stole from the disabled old man, the house and land that he owned that was his home, for the use of and by The University of Queensland.  The clandestine fraud was orchestrated by the Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  The fraud involved an ARMED ROBBERY of the disabled old man by Queensland Police in company with a Queensland government Authority, for the benefit of another Queensland Government authority viz, The University of Queensland. The case involved a fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man. The same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala also charged the disabled old man with other charges to favour The University of Queensland, who had been defrauding the disabled old man for years.  ..

Instead of the Australian government doing as it should to honour its International Commitments [
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]] to rail against exploitation of disabled persons, it is actually perpetuating, ITSELF, the exploitation of this disabled old man, because no doubt, the exploitation of the disabled old man was by the Queensland Government, and a number of parts of the Queensland Government in collusion.

This fraud of the disabled old man was orchestrated by Queensland Public Sector Parasite, Douglas Porter, when he was Registrar of The University of Queensland, for the benefit of The University of Queensland and to punish the disabled old man for standing up for his rights as a Disabled person, while at The University of Queensland.  Involved in the Porter perpetrated fraud was an ARMED ROBBERY by the Queensland Government being the Queensland police in particular corrupt cops Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony, of the disabled old man at his home together with a concurrent fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man by the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala.

The law confirms that the Armed Robbery by Henri EliasRantala and Monica Louise Antony, was actually a CRIMINAL
armed robbery. The factual evidence is also online.  The conduct constituting the armed robbery was not just accidental.   The perpetrators of the fraud, Queensland Public Sector parasites, set out to create what they expected would be an arguable case TO JUSTIFY THE "ARMED ROBBERY" as just part of their normal operations.    They created a RUSE for just that reasonHowever, the silly bitch lawyer Joanne Whiting, did not know what she was doing, so clearly the Ruse was hatched by one of her superiors.

That fact then begs the question of the purpose of that
RUSE and armed robbery, and exposes the perpetrators of the defrauding of the disabled old man of his home.  Because the Queensland Government perpetrated the fraud of the disabled old man of his home, his house and land, the Queensland government wants it concealed.  Therefore, the conduct of prosecuting the disabled old man is criminal and makes the perpetrated an accessory to the fraud.  The evidence giving those prosecuting the disabled old man a "guilty mind" is all that evidence on that webpage.  Those involved now in "prosecuting" the disabled old man  are criminal. 

While the corrupt parasite Shane Hunter, a prosecutor from the Commonwealth DPP, had the knowledge that the corrupt police Rantala and Antony did commit an armed robbery, he cannot be prosecuted as he has "advocates' immunity".  However, none of the others involved in the process of prosecuting the Disabled Old Man have immunity.  Corrupt ex-cop [now 'working' for KPMG] Brendan Scott Read had put another "prosecutor" from the CDPP right into the frame, by admitting they colluded to bring the false charges against the disabled old man, but that prosecutor was not an advocate in this matter, so does not have
advocates' immunity.  That other parasite from the CDPP is named Anthony Gett.  Corrupt ex-cop Brendan Scott Read also does not have immunity from prosecution for being an accessory to the Armed Robbery and to the defrauding the disabled old man of his house and land, worth in the order of $1million.  Of course, we will be assisting the disabled old man to gain many more similar house and land properties in the area from the Fraudsters.  This will include the house of the defrauding lawyer who did the transfer of the title with full knowledge of the fraud.  His name is Stephen Tonge.  The Queensland Government, both the Queensland Public Sector university, The University of Queensland, and the Queensland Government of Anna Bligh proper,  will be up for the majority of the damages.  This all arose because the disabled old man IS disabled.  It was thought by the public sector parasites, with UQ Registrar Douglas Porter, as the lead criminal in the box seat driving the fraud of the disabled old man, that the disabled old man was ripe for exploitation, because he is permanently disabled.  Now, the Commonwealth of Australia, in the person of the corrupt Commonwealth DPP prosecutor Shane R. Hunter, has joined the fray exploiting the disabled old man.  This in in stark contravention of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The parasitic Federal labor government acceded to the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities  on 21st August, 2009.

Because all the police involved in the prosecution of the disabled old man, are presumed to know the detail of the evidence proving the armed robbery because the evidence and legal reason is in the Public Domain, online and it would be reasonable to presume that police would check its validity, and we know the evidence is 100% genuine, then all the police including the police solicitor Paxton Booth are put in the frame by the evidence of Brendan Scott Read.  The other police aware of the criminal conduct in which they were engaged included  Detective Sergeant Steven Bignall, Detective Senior Constables Gavin Hackett and Detective Senior Constable Dave Graham.  Each of these has been engaged in a criminal activity.  This amounts to 

Because parasitic fraudster Shane Hunter of the CDPP was prepared to prosecute these charges, when he knew the evidence proved that police Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony committed an Armed Robbery, suggests that he expected a win, meaning that he knew the Magistrates Court, and possibly the District Court are corrupt, like as displayed, maybe by Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and District Court Judge Leanne Clare.  that .d ..


This case now has a high profile International dimension.  Australia has ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD].  Importantly, the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia has, on 21st August, 2009 acceded to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [OP].  As shyster Shane Hunter is a Commonwealth Public Servant within the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, a Commonwealth Agency, a part of the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, he and it are subject to the OP.  As the disabled old man has already suffered extensive discrimination, and fraud, at the hands of Shyster Shane Hunter, breach of the CRPD has already occurred and hence, pursuant to the OP, formal complaint can be made to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Geneva, Switzerland, once all domestic Australian remedies have been exhausted, or effectively exhausted.

The summary for each day will be a Menu of the anchors [or markers/tags] placed in the Transcript of this day.  It will be effectively a Summary of the discussion between the Magistrate Paul M Kluck [the Klutz] and Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, [who knows the evidence that  proves the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala did in fact commit an armed robbery because no-one had authority to enter exclusively possessed land, on that occasion; they needed a court order but did not have one].  The disabled old man did not appear in the committal hearing coram Kluck, after 28th June, as he had become ill from the constant barrage of harassment and jibes aimed at his disabilities, and attacks upon his weaknesses caused by his disabilities, from the Magistrate Kluck the Klutz and from the Commonwealth Government lawyer fraudster Shane Hunter.  Of course, neither need worry as Magistrate Klutz has Judicial Immunity and shyster Shane Hunter who knows he is assisting a crime perpetrated by the Government against a disabled citizen, including EXPLOITATION of the DISABLED, to remain concealed, has Advocates' Immunity.  In Kluck's court, Due Process was abrogated, because the disabled old man had Special Needs that were not accommodated by Paul M Kluck. Hence, from that moment, Kluck's court became a nullity. Thus, from then, the disabled old man was denied Due Process.  Read on the transcript, how Magistrate Kluck ridiculed the disabled old man.

At the time of committing the Armed Robbery of the disabled old man, Henri Elias Rantala illegally arrested the disabled old man so as to keep him from his home while his home was ransacked and his yard was cleared of all of his possession to order of the Queensland Government, who wished to take control of his property in quick time, for The University of Queensland to use.  This was orchestrated by the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  Well, on 20th July, 2010, 22 days after the last day that the disabled old man tried to perform in the committal hearing, on 28th June, 2010, the Queensland Court of Appeal gave it decision regarding that illegal arrest on that day of the disabled old man by parasite cop Rantala.  In clear dicta the Court of Appeal raised the spectre of the gross criminality involved in the whole matter

This day's transcript is one continuous file/page.  These anchors when listed will be listed in sequence.
The three days when witnesses have actually given evidence have been similarly summarised with "anchors" [aka markers/tags], and each appears thus:
  1. Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  2. Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  3. Day 3: 28th June, 2010
This case has international consequences, as this action by the Commonwealth Prosecutor, given that the disabled old man has been thrown out of his home by a corrupt judicial system of the magistrates and District Courts, is a disgusting reflection upon the judicial principle of Due Process, for any country in the world. This will make Australia the laughing stock of the international justice community.  So much more so as all this has been done with the full knowledge of the Australian Attorney General, Robert McClelland.

considerevidence.php

Consider the evidence! Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay.  

includedCDDMenuAvengerRevengeRetribution.php http://HaigReport.com/aaaaMenu/Menus/includedMenuDefraudingMeMyHome.php

LinkToAspinallInMorganPanel This Profile Panel re the dumb parasitic anglican priest John Leslie Morgan, links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud by archbishop Phillip Aspinall of a vulnerable disabled guy where anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall headed up the scheme to steal the home of this vulnerable disabled guy.

http://HaigReport.com/Photos/100_0663_20070120CanonRevProfDrJohnLeslieMorganWardenStJohnsCollegeUniversityQueenslandHidingBehindToiletRolls_cr30pc.jpg
About this despicable life form , Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, now Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.

This photo was taken in a supermarket, on the 20th January, 2007 at 4:54PM Brisbane, Australia time, when Morgan was attemting to not be photographed by hiding behind some toilet rolls.

This individual is evil and he escapes scrutiny as he is a "priest".  Over time I have collected much evidence about his evil and criminal actions and published it.  I have assembled that into a menu.  I now include that menu here.
/PHPincludesCorruptBrisbaneDiocese/includedMenuJohnMorgan.php Menu: CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan, @ St Johns College, UQ:
*  PROOF of the 2001 FRAUD  by CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Morgan
*  Directory of links about Criminal parasite priest Rev Canon John Leslie Morgan:
*  Directory of Anglican CORRUPTION matters:
*  Anglicans conspire to steal the home of disabled with aid of political & judicial corruption
*  PROOF of another instance that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is yet again a LIAR
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is Incompetent
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is a BULLY
*  Email from Morgan showing he is a silly malicious ratbag 
*  Is this Primate Aspinall's BUSINESS ACUMEN?
*  Anglican priest bullies DISABLED Neighbour to STEAL his HOME.
*  Yet another Morgan LIE that neither he nor St John's College had any documents about me..  I had to push it all the way to the Privacy Commission, who Morgan was repeatedly ignoring.  He really thinks he is god.
*  Anglican CORRUPTION EXPOSED
*  Another Morgan LIE
*  One of the many examples of MONEY & FRAUD being motivator of 'Rev' John Morgan
*  $1Mill+ FRAUD- St Johns College & University of Queensland
*  Australian CRIMINAL LAW Journal ISSN: 1321-6562 26 February, 2007. Issue #: 200702
*  FRAUD on Uni Students: $1,500 RENT PER WEEK, for an ASBESTOS RIDDEN dump.
*  Is FRAUD the answer for Anglican return on investment?

We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland. 

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php aaaaLinks/LinkToRantalaGateIndexPage.php

If you wish to view and USE the Full    Rantala-Gate:   Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia  cascading drop down menu [CDDM], click to GoTo the   Rantala-Gate:    website.



New Document xt of Transcript

Corrupt Police Rantala, Brisbane Magistrates Court, 'Mention', 8th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php includedMenuMagistratesCourtsCorruptPoliceRantalaTranscripts.php

Menu: Truncated Committal Hearing re Corrupt Police Henri Elias Rantala,

Brisbane Magistrates Court, 24th, 25th & 28th June, 2010 coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

Transcripts of Hearing days on which witnesses gave evidence, with Summaries as Menus of Anchors/Markers:

  1. Summary of this Case of Fraud by Queensland Police &Commonwealth DPP
  2. Index:
  3. *Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  4. *Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  5. *Day 3: 28th June, 2010

Transcripts of related Mentions, after the truncation of the committal; ['*' preceding links below means that that transcript is preceded by  a 'Summary' which is a Menu of Anchors/Markers:]

  1. Day 00:   9th June, 2010
  2. *Day 04: 29th June, 2010
  3. *Day 05: 30th June, 2010
  4. *Day 06:     1st July, 2010
  5. *Day 07:    9th July, 2010
  6. *Day 08: 10th August, 2010
  7. *Day 09:    1st September, 2010
  8. *Day 10:   8th September, 2010
  9.  * Day 11: 15th September, 2010
  10. Day 12: 22th September, 2010
  11. Day 13: 24th September, 2010

Transcripts for Pre-Trial Mentions, coram various magistrates:

  1. Day A: 14th September, 2009
  2. Day B: 2nd November, 2009
  3. Day C: 25th January, 2010
  4. Day D: 15th March, 2010.

MenuAnchorsDayXX

Future Summary of this Transcript  [which appears below] of Brisbane Magistrates Court, MENTION on 8th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck.

  1. #Corrupt_Rantala_Brisbane_Magistrates_Co
  2. #Day Of Hearing Title
  3. #Day Of Month
  4. #Defendant Name
  5. #Defendant Title
  6. #Indictment Number
  7. #Indictment Year
  8. #Judge Surname
  9. #Judge Title
  10. #Jurisdiction
  11. #Location
  12. #Month
  13. #Plaintiff Name
  14. #Plaintiff Title
  15. #Year
  16. #Kluck_appoints_Clare_Jarvis_to_be_the_recorder
  17. #Klutz Magistrate Paul M Kluck Quickly Sets The Stage With False Fact That No Response From Me
  18. #My Editorial Listing The Link To My Actual Email Response Two Days Earlier    ====>>>    /My Actual Email Sent TWO DAYS Earlier Kluck  Hunter Lied And Denied.php#Two Days Earlier
  19. Shyster Shane Hunter LaterAdmits in Writing that it was received when sent. & in particular Click HERE & Click HERE
  20. #Kluck Quickly Obtains Statement From Shyster Shane Of No Response From Me So Shyster Shane Hunter Cannot Retract
  21. #Shyster Shane Is Now Locked Into That Lie
  22. #Klutz Kluck Traps Shyster Shane Hunter In The Lie
  23. #Ms A For Accommodating Agreeable Ainsthorpe Has Given Wrong Advice To Shyster Shane Hunter Of Purpose Of Today
  24. #Shyster Shane Now Questions The False Fact He Has Just Confirmed That I Had Not Responded When In Fact I Had
  25. #Klutz Kluck Now Returns To His Real Agenda To Rid Himself Of This Problem
  26. #EDITORIAL_Of Reason Klutz Kluck Wants To Be Rid Of This Case
  27. #After Previously Refusing Accommodation Of My Special Needs Klutz Kluck Now Admits Justice Is Not Being Done
  28. #Klutz Kluck Tries To Blame Me For His Denial Of My Special Needs By Saying I Am Not Doing Justice To Myself
  29. #Shyster Shane Refers To Section 613 Queensland Criminal Code
  30. #Kluck States He Thinks I Have A Neurological Impairment
  31. #Shyster Shane Now Mentions My Resounding Victory In The Court Of Appeal On 20th July 2010
  32. #Shyster Shane Hunter States I Appeared In The Court Of Appeal To Argue My Appeal Albeit By Telephone
  33. #Klutz Kluck States He Would Not Like Me To Be Held In Custody
  34. #And Brought Before The Court Each  Day
  35. #Shyster Shane Believes I Should Be Present At Least By Phone To Hear His Submission On Whether I Should Be Refered To The District Court
  36. #Shyster Shane States That I Am Refusing To Come To Court
  37. #Kluck The Klutz States He Has Placed Each And Every Email Of Mine On The Record
  38. #Kluck Qualifies That To The Emails Of Which He Knows So No Doubt A Reference To Todays Of Which He Is Feigning Ignorance
  39. #Shyster Shane Now Canvasses The Possibility Of My Being Excluded From My Trial BECAUSE _I _AM _DISABLED. _THAT _IS _AN _OUTRAGE
  40. #Klutz Kluck Then Considers If He Could Exclude Me From The Committal Hearing For Contempt Of Court
  41. #Klutz Kluck Admits That Is A Drastic Step In The Case Of Disability But Still Considered It
  42. #Klutz Kluck Says No Normal Person Would Be Behaving Like This So Something Is Wrong
  43. #Klutz Kluck Admits He Cannot Insist On My Being Legally Represented
  44. #Kluts Kluck Admits He Cannot Insist On My Having A McKenzie Friend
  45. #Klutz Kluck Is Perplexed
  46. #Klutz Kluck Says Most Normal Persons Would Show Respect For The Court And Appear  
  47. #Shyster Shane Again Mentions Case Of My Friend Megumi Ogawa Who Was Denied Justice In The District Court
  48. #Shyster Shane Perpetuates The Lie That Threats Were Made To The Federal Court Registry
  49. #Shyster Shane Hunter Wants Me Formally Threatened By The Court With Arrest
  50. #Kluck The Klutz Advises That In The Past I Have Taken Such Threats As Intimidation
  51. #Kluck The Klutz Advises That In The Past I Have Taken Such As Not Respecting My Disability
  52. #Kluck The Klutz States That In The Past I Have Gone Off On Another Stream Of Abusive Emails
  53. #Klutz Kluck Decides He Should Ask Me If I Am Raising The Question Of My Fitness To Be Tried
  54. #Klutz Kluck Stays That I Write Back And Say I Am Fit  To Be Tried And I Am Going To Win [I am unaware of saying that.]
  55. #Klutz Kluck Says That As I Am Not Legally Represented The Question Of My Fitness To Be Tried Must Be Raised By Me Or Shyster Shane
  56. #Klutz Kluck Then States That The Court Can Think For Itself
  57. #This Suggests That Klutz Kluck Thinks He Can Extend The Legislation
  58. #Shyster Shane Hunter Raises The Relevant Precedent Case On Fitness To Stand Trial Of R v Presser
  59. #Kluck Thinks Presser Case Considers Mental And Physical DISABILITIES
  60. #Shyster Shane Then Presumes To Tell Klutz Kluck What Should Now Occur
  61. #Klutz Kluick Asks Shyster Shane If An Email Response From Me Will Be Sufficient Response
  62. #Shyster Shane Advises That An Email Response From Me Will Be Sufficient Response
  63. #Shyster Shane And Klutz Kluck Want My Views On The Question Of My Fitness To Stand Trial Emailed To Them
  64. #Shyster Shane Asks If Bail Act Provision Of Remanding Me In Custody For The Purpose Of A Psychiatriatric Examination Might Be Appropriate
  65. #Shyster Shane And Klutz Kluck Show Their Ignorance Of What They Are Doing In Discussion
  66. #These Two Rare Talents Thank Each Other Yet Again



PHPincludes/includedWrittenByRussellMathews.php
Web-site, Written, Coded, Produced and Directed by
Russell G H Mathews
BCom BSc LLB BA

International Disability Rights Advocate
invoking
UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
& UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Image
CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE

View list of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards
Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html

RussellMathewsEmailSignatureDRA

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
International Disability Rights Advocate
invoking
UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
& UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
See my RESOUNDING VICTORY 20th July, 2010 in
Qld Court of Appeal

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of
      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND
Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]

http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

includedCDDMenuAvengerRevengeRetribution.php http://HaigReport.com/aaaaMenu/Menus/includedMenuDefraudingMeMyHome.php

LinkToAspinallInMorganPanel This Profile Panel re the dumb parasitic anglican priest John Leslie Morgan, links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud by archbishop Phillip Aspinall of a vulnerable disabled guy where anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall headed up the scheme to steal the home of this vulnerable disabled guy.

http://HaigReport.com/Photos/100_0663_20070120CanonRevProfDrJohnLeslieMorganWardenStJohnsCollegeUniversityQueenslandHidingBehindToiletRolls_cr30pc.jpg
About this despicable life form , Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, now Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.

This photo was taken in a supermarket, on the 20th January, 2007 at 4:54PM Brisbane, Australia time, when Morgan was attemting to not be photographed by hiding behind some toilet rolls.

This individual is evil and he escapes scrutiny as he is a "priest".  Over time I have collected much evidence about his evil and criminal actions and published it.  I have assembled that into a menu.  I now include that menu here.
/PHPincludesCorruptBrisbaneDiocese/includedMenuJohnMorgan.php Menu: CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan, @ St Johns College, UQ:
*  PROOF of the 2001 FRAUD  by CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Morgan
*  Directory of links about Criminal parasite priest Rev Canon John Leslie Morgan:
*  Directory of Anglican CORRUPTION matters:
*  Anglicans conspire to steal the home of disabled with aid of political & judicial corruption
*  PROOF of another instance that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is yet again a LIAR
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is Incompetent
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is a BULLY
*  Email from Morgan showing he is a silly malicious ratbag 
*  Is this Primate Aspinall's BUSINESS ACUMEN?
*  Anglican priest bullies DISABLED Neighbour to STEAL his HOME.
*  Yet another Morgan LIE that neither he nor St John's College had any documents about me..  I had to push it all the way to the Privacy Commission, who Morgan was repeatedly ignoring.  He really thinks he is god.
*  Anglican CORRUPTION EXPOSED
*  Another Morgan LIE
*  One of the many examples of MONEY & FRAUD being motivator of 'Rev' John Morgan
*  $1Mill+ FRAUD- St Johns College & University of Queensland
*  Australian CRIMINAL LAW Journal ISSN: 1321-6562 26 February, 2007. Issue #: 200702
*  FRAUD on Uni Students: $1,500 RENT PER WEEK, for an ASBESTOS RIDDEN dump.
*  Is FRAUD the answer for Anglican return on investment?

We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland. 

Fraud by Douglas Porter, The University of Queensland, [part of the Australian Government], by defrauding a disabled reclusive old man of his HOUSE & LAND; including Douglas Porter's being linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity

These pages will be developed to expose the defrauding of a disabled, and hence reclusive old man of his house and land at 254 Hawken Drive St Lucia [view MAP] by Douglas Porter, the previous Registrar of The University of Queensland, for use by The University of Queensland.  Douglas Porter had been attacking, bullying and discriminating against this disabled reclusive old man since the early 1990s when he was a mature age student at The University of Queensland.

Porter was closely associated with two others linked to the Attempted MURDER of the disabled old man, being the then recent law lecturers Quentin Bryce, and Patsy Mary Wolfe.  The disabled old man was, at that time, a student of law at the University of Queensland, where Porter was Registrar.  Porter was engaged in bullying 
the disabled old man prior to the Attempted Murder of the disabled old man, and subsequenly, but then with greater  gusto.   Douglas Porter, then, as clandstine Chair of the St Johns College Council, that ran the St Johns College on the St Lucia, Brisbane Campus of The University of Queensland, began to secretly orchestrate the theft of the home of the disabled old man; the house and land owned in trust by the disabled old man, to take advantage of the fact that the disabled old man was under a strident attack..  

LinkToAspinallInPorterPanel.php This Profile Panel re the parasitic Douglas Porter, rewarded by the anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall and the anglican church, because Porter used confidential information obtained as Registrar of The University of Queensland, to assist Phillip Aspinall steal the home of a vulnerable disabled guy links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud of this vulnerable disabled guy by anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall.

  Douglas PORTER is linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity.
See fat pig parasite Porter playing with himself

  masturbating

in his office. So, what can you expect from The University of Queensland?
Write and tell us what you think about this University.
  Douglas Porter taken at 9:55AM 12th July, 2006 in his office at The University of Queensland where he was at that time, Registrar of The University of Queensland, and also clandestinely, the Representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly Chairman of, the St Johns College Council which runs St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland.  For years prior and years since then, Porter was secretly scheming to steal my home, beneficially owned by me, from me, by threatening and manipulating the emotionally challenged emotional shell of the trustee.

Concurrently, while I was then a student at the Universiity of Queensland, Douglas Porter, as Registrar, repeatedly discriminated against me in relation to my use of the libraries and my being accompanied by my two wee assistance dogs while on the campus of UQ.

Just days before the armed robbery on me on 29th November, 2004, by corrupt cop [and Armed Robber] at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, as a preliminary and integral step towards stealing my property [my home, my beneficially owned house and land], from me, all orchestrated by Douglas Porter, Douglas Porter had that same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala charge me with bogus criminal charges. No doubt this was intended to complicate my life even more than my life was being complicated, on top of my disabilities, by all the Douglas Porter inspired disability discrimination of me in UQ libraries, so making the theft of my home even easier for The University of Queensland.


We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this intellectual lightweight and corrupt gutless parasite .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 .   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 . 

Douglas Porter was The University of Queensland's SECRETIVE/CLANDESTINE representative, [and Chair], on the Governing body of one college, St Johns College at the University of Queensland - [see 7th paragraph of this linked UQ publication] or our copy.   [Of course, The University of Queensland has complete control of that land on which the college is built, with its complicated legal arrangement.]  The Governing body is called the the St Johns College Council [SJCC] and Douglas Porter is the Chair of the SJCC. Important in the workings of St Johns College and the St Johns College Council, is the SJCC Budget.  The Warden of St Johns College is the fraudster the Rev John Morgan.  He is answerable to the SJCC for the running of SJC.  In particular, he is petrified of his spending being in excess of the SJCC budget.  He even attempts to defraud to avoid spending money that is not in the SJCC budget.  Earlier that year, Morgan admitted lying to me the previous year, so that he would not have to face up to the St Johns College Council [SJCC], for having spent money that he was legally required to spend, that was, however, not in the SJCC budget.  

Hence, SJCC is a part of the Australian Government Sector, as is The University of Queensland.  Also involved in this fraud were other divisions of the Australian Public Sector, namely the Brisbane City Council, Queensland Police [including the most senior level, on the evidence of the Queensland Police], Queensland Courts especially Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and Supreme Court Judge Henry George Fryberg. Others were involved for the money they would make from it and to be "on the in" with corrupt public sector parasites.  These include lawyer Stephen Tonge, [view home of Tonge on MAP]  then a partner of Firm of lawyers Flower & Hart but more recently of Tress Cox.  Some Capital Funding was provided by the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church aka the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Paul de Jersey, is the Chancellor of the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC].  They provided the funding for an expected return [albeit fraudulent] of approximately 20% year on year plus a locked in Capital Gain well in excess of CPI indexation.

Because the Australian Government has been involved in defrauding this disabled reclusive old man, this matter, and his being defrauded of his Commonwealth Disability Support Pension by Centrelink, will end up coram/before UN committees in Geneva pursuant to Australia's acceding to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.   The Corrupt Australian Government and all parts of it involved in this widespread fraud should be greatly shamed and we will expose them.

The Queensland Court of Appeal, the highest court in Queensland, has recently spoken on this matter.  [It was written up in the Brisbane newspaper as "Talk of the Legal World".], However, there is far more to come.

Link to Public Sector Parasites VERSUS the Internet:

On a related topic, have a look at Public Sector Parasites Versus The Internet:
It's coming: Watch this space, but in the interim have a look at:

http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

http://HaigReport.com/aaaaMenu/Menus/includedMenuDefraudingMeMyHome.php

LinkToAspinallInMorganPanel This Profile Panel re the dumb parasitic anglican priest John Leslie Morgan, links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud by archbishop Phillip Aspinall of a vulnerable disabled guy where anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall headed up the scheme to steal the home of this vulnerable disabled guy.

http://HaigReport.com/Photos/100_0663_20070120CanonRevProfDrJohnLeslieMorganWardenStJohnsCollegeUniversityQueenslandHidingBehindToiletRolls_cr30pc.jpg
About this despicable life form , Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, now Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.

This photo was taken in a supermarket, on the 20th January, 2007 at 4:54PM Brisbane, Australia time, when Morgan was attemting to not be photographed by hiding behind some toilet rolls.

This individual is evil and he escapes scrutiny as he is a "priest".  Over time I have collected much evidence about his evil and criminal actions and published it.  I have assembled that into a menu.  I now include that menu here.
/PHPincludesCorruptBrisbaneDiocese/includedMenuJohnMorgan.php Menu: CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan, @ St Johns College, UQ:
*  PROOF of the 2001 FRAUD  by CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Morgan
*  Directory of links about Criminal parasite priest Rev Canon John Leslie Morgan:
*  Directory of Anglican CORRUPTION matters:
*  Anglicans conspire to steal the home of disabled with aid of political & judicial corruption
*  PROOF of another instance that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is yet again a LIAR
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is Incompetent
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is a BULLY
*  Email from Morgan showing he is a silly malicious ratbag 
*  Is this Primate Aspinall's BUSINESS ACUMEN?
*  Anglican priest bullies DISABLED Neighbour to STEAL his HOME.
*  Yet another Morgan LIE that neither he nor St John's College had any documents about me..  I had to push it all the way to the Privacy Commission, who Morgan was repeatedly ignoring.  He really thinks he is god.
*  Anglican CORRUPTION EXPOSED
*  Another Morgan LIE
*  One of the many examples of MONEY & FRAUD being motivator of 'Rev' John Morgan
*  $1Mill+ FRAUD- St Johns College & University of Queensland
*  Australian CRIMINAL LAW Journal ISSN: 1321-6562 26 February, 2007. Issue #: 200702
*  FRAUD on Uni Students: $1,500 RENT PER WEEK, for an ASBESTOS RIDDEN dump.
*  Is FRAUD the answer for Anglican return on investment?

We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland. 

xt of Transcript

Corrupt Police Rantala, Brisbane Magistrates Court, 'Mention', 8th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php includedMenuMagistratesCourtsCorruptPoliceRantalaTranscripts.php

Menu: Truncated Committal Hearing re Corrupt Police Henri Elias Rantala,

Brisbane Magistrates Court, 24th, 25th & 28th June, 2010 coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

Transcripts of Hearing days on which witnesses gave evidence, with Summaries as Menus of Anchors/Markers:

  1. Summary of this Case of Fraud by Queensland Police &Commonwealth DPP
  2. Index:
  3. *Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  4. *Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  5. *Day 3: 28th June, 2010

Transcripts of related Mentions, after the truncation of the committal; ['*' preceding links below means that that transcript is preceded by  a 'Summary' which is a Menu of Anchors/Markers:]

  1. Day 00:   9th June, 2010
  2. *Day 04: 29th June, 2010
  3. *Day 05: 30th June, 2010
  4. *Day 06:     1st July, 2010
  5. *Day 07:    9th July, 2010
  6. *Day 08: 10th August, 2010
  7. *Day 09:    1st September, 2010
  8. *Day 10:   8th September, 2010
  9.  * Day 11: 15th September, 2010
  10. Day 12: 22th September, 2010
  11. Day 13: 24th September, 2010

Transcripts for Pre-Trial Mentions, coram various magistrates:

  1. Day A: 14th September, 2009
  2. Day B: 2nd November, 2009
  3. Day C: 25th January, 2010
  4. Day D: 15th March, 2010.

MenuAnchorsDayXX

Future Summary of this Transcript  [which appears below] of Brisbane Magistrates Court, MENTION on 8th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck.

  1. #Corrupt_Rantala_Brisbane_Magistrates_Co
  2. #Day Of Hearing Title
  3. #Day Of Month
  4. #Defendant Name
  5. #Defendant Title
  6. #Indictment Number
  7. #Indictment Year
  8. #Judge Surname
  9. #Judge Title
  10. #Jurisdiction
  11. #Location
  12. #Month
  13. #Plaintiff Name
  14. #Plaintiff Title
  15. #Year
  16. #Kluck_appoints_Clare_Jarvis_to_be_the_recorder
  17. #Klutz Magistrate Paul M Kluck Quickly Sets The Stage With False Fact That No Response From Me
  18. #My Editorial Listing The Link To My Actual Email Response Two Days Earlier    ====>>>    /My Actual Email Sent TWO DAYS Earlier Kluck  Hunter Lied And Denied.php#Two Days Earlier
  19. Shyster Shane Hunter LaterAdmits in Writing that it was received when sent. & in particular Click HERE & Click HERE
  20. #Kluck Quickly Obtains Statement From Shyster Shane Of No Response From Me So Shyster Shane Hunter Cannot Retract
  21. #Shyster Shane Is Now Locked Into That Lie
  22. #Klutz Kluck Traps Shyster Shane Hunter In The Lie
  23. #Ms A For Accommodating Agreeable Ainsthorpe Has Given Wrong Advice To Shyster Shane Hunter Of Purpose Of Today
  24. #Shyster Shane Now Questions The False Fact He Has Just Confirmed That I Had Not Responded When In Fact I Had
  25. #Klutz Kluck Now Returns To His Real Agenda To Rid Himself Of This Problem
  26. #EDITORIAL_Of Reason Klutz Kluck Wants To Be Rid Of This Case
  27. #After Previously Refusing Accommodation Of My Special Needs Klutz Kluck Now Admits Justice Is Not Being Done
  28. #Klutz Kluck Tries To Blame Me For His Denial Of My Special Needs By Saying I Am Not Doing Justice To Myself
  29. #Shyster Shane Refers To Section 613 Queensland Criminal Code
  30. #Kluck States He Thinks I Have A Neurological Impairment
  31. #Shyster Shane Now Mentions My Resounding Victory In The Court Of Appeal On 20th July 2010
  32. #Shyster Shane Hunter States I Appeared In The Court Of Appeal To Argue My Appeal Albeit By Telephone
  33. #Klutz Kluck States He Would Not Like Me To Be Held In Custody
  34. #And Brought Before The Court Each  Day
  35. #Shyster Shane Believes I Should Be Present At Least By Phone To Hear His Submission On Whether I Should Be Refered To The District Court
  36. #Shyster Shane States That I Am Refusing To Come To Court
  37. #Kluck The Klutz States He Has Placed Each And Every Email Of Mine On The Record
  38. #Kluck Qualifies That To The Emails Of Which He Knows So No Doubt A Reference To Todays Of Which He Is Feigning Ignorance
  39. #Shyster Shane Now Canvasses The Possibility Of My Being Excluded From My Trial BECAUSE _I _AM _DISABLED. _THAT _IS _AN _OUTRAGE
  40. #Klutz Kluck Then Considers If He Could Exclude Me From The Committal Hearing For Contempt Of Court
  41. #Klutz Kluck Admits That Is A Drastic Step In The Case Of Disability But Still Considered It
  42. #Klutz Kluck Says No Normal Person Would Be Behaving Like This So Something Is Wrong
  43. #Klutz Kluck Admits He Cannot Insist On My Being Legally Represented
  44. #Kluts Kluck Admits He Cannot Insist On My Having A McKenzie Friend
  45. #Klutz Kluck Is Perplexed
  46. #Klutz Kluck Says Most Normal Persons Would Show Respect For The Court And Appear  
  47. #Shyster Shane Again Mentions Case Of My Friend Megumi Ogawa Who Was Denied Justice In The District Court
  48. #Shyster Shane Perpetuates The Lie That Threats Were Made To The Federal Court Registry
  49. #Shyster Shane Hunter Wants Me Formally Threatened By The Court With Arrest
  50. #Kluck The Klutz Advises That In The Past I Have Taken Such Threats As Intimidation
  51. #Kluck The Klutz Advises That In The Past I Have Taken Such As Not Respecting My Disability
  52. #Kluck The Klutz States That In The Past I Have Gone Off On Another Stream Of Abusive Emails
  53. #Klutz Kluck Decides He Should Ask Me If I Am Raising The Question Of My Fitness To Be Tried
  54. #Klutz Kluck Stays That I Write Back And Say I Am Fit  To Be Tried And I Am Going To Win [I am unaware of saying that.]
  55. #Klutz Kluck Says That As I Am Not Legally Represented The Question Of My Fitness To Be Tried Must Be Raised By Me Or Shyster Shane
  56. #Klutz Kluck Then States That The Court Can Think For Itself
  57. #This Suggests That Klutz Kluck Thinks He Can Extend The Legislation
  58. #Shyster Shane Hunter Raises The Relevant Precedent Case On Fitness To Stand Trial Of R v Presser
  59. #Kluck Thinks Presser Case Considers Mental And Physical DISABILITIES
  60. #Shyster Shane Then Presumes To Tell Klutz Kluck What Should Now Occur
  61. #Klutz Kluick Asks Shyster Shane If An Email Response From Me Will Be Sufficient Response
  62. #Shyster Shane Advises That An Email Response From Me Will Be Sufficient Response
  63. #Shyster Shane And Klutz Kluck Want My Views On The Question Of My Fitness To Stand Trial Emailed To Them
  64. #Shyster Shane Asks If Bail Act Provision Of Remanding Me In Custody For The Purpose Of A Psychiatriatric Examination Might Be Appropriate
  65. #Shyster Shane And Klutz Kluck Show Their Ignorance Of What They Are Doing In Discussion
  66. #These Two Rare Talents Thank Each Other Yet Again


includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php aaaaLinks/LinkToRantalaGateIndexPage.php

If you wish to view and USE the Full    Rantala-Gate:   Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia  cascading drop down menu [CDDM], click to GoTo the   Rantala-Gate:    website.



Fraud by Douglas Porter, The University of Queensland, [part of the Australian Government], by defrauding a disabled reclusive old man of his HOUSE & LAND; including Douglas Porter's being linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity

These pages will be developed to expose the defrauding of a disabled, and hence reclusive old man of his house and land at 254 Hawken Drive St Lucia [view MAP] by Douglas Porter, the previous Registrar of The University of Queensland, for use by The University of Queensland.  Douglas Porter had been attacking, bullying and discriminating against this disabled reclusive old man since the early 1990s when he was a mature age student at The University of Queensland.

Porter was closely associated with two others linked to the Attempted MURDER of the disabled old man, being the then recent law lecturers Quentin Bryce, and Patsy Mary Wolfe.  The disabled old man was, at that time, a student of law at the University of Queensland, where Porter was Registrar.  Porter was engaged in bullying 
the disabled old man prior to the Attempted Murder of the disabled old man, and subsequenly, but then with greater  gusto.   Douglas Porter, then, as clandstine Chair of the St Johns College Council, that ran the St Johns College on the St Lucia, Brisbane Campus of The University of Queensland, began to secretly orchestrate the theft of the home of the disabled old man; the house and land owned in trust by the disabled old man, to take advantage of the fact that the disabled old man was under a strident attack..  

LinkToAspinallInPorterPanel.php This Profile Panel re the parasitic Douglas Porter, rewarded by the anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall and the anglican church, because Porter used confidential information obtained as Registrar of The University of Queensland, to assist Phillip Aspinall steal the home of a vulnerable disabled guy links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud of this vulnerable disabled guy by anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall.

  Douglas PORTER is linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity.
See fat pig parasite Porter playing with himself

  masturbating

in his office. So, what can you expect from The University of Queensland?
Write and tell us what you think about this University.
  Douglas Porter taken at 9:55AM 12th July, 2006 in his office at The University of Queensland where he was at that time, Registrar of The University of Queensland, and also clandestinely, the Representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly Chairman of, the St Johns College Council which runs St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland.  For years prior and years since then, Porter was secretly scheming to steal my home, beneficially owned by me, from me, by threatening and manipulating the emotionally challenged emotional shell of the trustee.

Concurrently, while I was then a student at the Universiity of Queensland, Douglas Porter, as Registrar, repeatedly discriminated against me in relation to my use of the libraries and my being accompanied by my two wee assistance dogs while on the campus of UQ.

Just days before the armed robbery on me on 29th November, 2004, by corrupt cop [and Armed Robber] at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, as a preliminary and integral step towards stealing my property [my home, my beneficially owned house and land], from me, all orchestrated by Douglas Porter, Douglas Porter had that same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala charge me with bogus criminal charges. No doubt this was intended to complicate my life even more than my life was being complicated, on top of my disabilities, by all the Douglas Porter inspired disability discrimination of me in UQ libraries, so making the theft of my home even easier for The University of Queensland.


We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this intellectual lightweight and corrupt gutless parasite .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 .   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 . 

Douglas Porter was The University of Queensland's SECRETIVE/CLANDESTINE representative, [and Chair], on the Governing body of one college, St Johns College at the University of Queensland - [see 7th paragraph of this linked UQ publication] or our copy.   [Of course, The University of Queensland has complete control of that land on which the college is built, with its complicated legal arrangement.]  The Governing body is called the the St Johns College Council [SJCC] and Douglas Porter is the Chair of the SJCC. Important in the workings of St Johns College and the St Johns College Council, is the SJCC Budget.  The Warden of St Johns College is the fraudster the Rev John Morgan.  He is answerable to the SJCC for the running of SJC.  In particular, he is petrified of his spending being in excess of the SJCC budget.  He even attempts to defraud to avoid spending money that is not in the SJCC budget.  Earlier that year, Morgan admitted lying to me the previous year, so that he would not have to face up to the St Johns College Council [SJCC], for having spent money that he was legally required to spend, that was, however, not in the SJCC budget.  

Hence, SJCC is a part of the Australian Government Sector, as is The University of Queensland.  Also involved in this fraud were other divisions of the Australian Public Sector, namely the Brisbane City Council, Queensland Police [including the most senior level, on the evidence of the Queensland Police], Queensland Courts especially Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and Supreme Court Judge Henry George Fryberg. Others were involved for the money they would make from it and to be "on the in" with corrupt public sector parasites.  These include lawyer Stephen Tonge, [view home of Tonge on MAP]  then a partner of Firm of lawyers Flower & Hart but more recently of Tress Cox.  Some Capital Funding was provided by the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church aka the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Paul de Jersey, is the Chancellor of the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC].  They provided the funding for an expected return [albeit fraudulent] of approximately 20% year on year plus a locked in Capital Gain well in excess of CPI indexation.

Because the Australian Government has been involved in defrauding this disabled reclusive old man, this matter, and his being defrauded of his Commonwealth Disability Support Pension by Centrelink, will end up coram/before UN committees in Geneva pursuant to Australia's acceding to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.   The Corrupt Australian Government and all parts of it involved in this widespread fraud should be greatly shamed and we will expose them.

The Queensland Court of Appeal, the highest court in Queensland, has recently spoken on this matter.  [It was written up in the Brisbane newspaper as "Talk of the Legal World".], However, there is far more to come.

includedCDDMenuAvengerRevengeRetribution.php xt of Transcript

Corrupt Police Rantala, Brisbane Magistrates Court, 'Mention', 8th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php includedMenuMagistratesCourtsCorruptPoliceRantalaTranscripts.php

Menu: Truncated Committal Hearing re Corrupt Police Henri Elias Rantala,

Brisbane Magistrates Court, 24th, 25th & 28th June, 2010 coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

Transcripts of Hearing days on which witnesses gave evidence, with Summaries as Menus of Anchors/Markers:

  1. Summary of this Case of Fraud by Queensland Police &Commonwealth DPP
  2. Index:
  3. *Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  4. *Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  5. *Day 3: 28th June, 2010

Transcripts of related Mentions, after the truncation of the committal; ['*' preceding links below means that that transcript is preceded by  a 'Summary' which is a Menu of Anchors/Markers:]

  1. Day 00:   9th June, 2010
  2. *Day 04: 29th June, 2010
  3. *Day 05: 30th June, 2010
  4. *Day 06:     1st July, 2010
  5. *Day 07:    9th July, 2010
  6. *Day 08: 10th August, 2010
  7. *Day 09:    1st September, 2010
  8. *Day 10:   8th September, 2010
  9.  * Day 11: 15th September, 2010
  10. Day 12: 22th September, 2010
  11. Day 13: 24th September, 2010

Transcripts for Pre-Trial Mentions, coram various magistrates:

  1. Day A: 14th September, 2009
  2. Day B: 2nd November, 2009
  3. Day C: 25th January, 2010
  4. Day D: 15th March, 2010.

MenuAnchorsDayXX

Future Summary of this Transcript  [which appears below] of Brisbane Magistrates Court, MENTION on 8th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck.

  1. #Corrupt_Rantala_Brisbane_Magistrates_Co
  2. #Day Of Hearing Title
  3. #Day Of Month
  4. #Defendant Name
  5. #Defendant Title
  6. #Indictment Number
  7. #Indictment Year
  8. #Judge Surname
  9. #Judge Title
  10. #Jurisdiction
  11. #Location
  12. #Month
  13. #Plaintiff Name
  14. #Plaintiff Title
  15. #Year
  16. #Kluck_appoints_Clare_Jarvis_to_be_the_recorder
  17. #Klutz Magistrate Paul M Kluck Quickly Sets The Stage With False Fact That No Response From Me
  18. #My Editorial Listing The Link To My Actual Email Response Two Days Earlier    ====>>>    /My Actual Email Sent TWO DAYS Earlier Kluck  Hunter Lied And Denied.php#Two Days Earlier
  19. Shyster Shane Hunter LaterAdmits in Writing that it was received when sent. & in particular Click HERE & Click HERE
  20. #Kluck Quickly Obtains Statement From Shyster Shane Of No Response From Me So Shyster Shane Hunter Cannot Retract
  21. #Shyster Shane Is Now Locked Into That Lie
  22. #Klutz Kluck Traps Shyster Shane Hunter In The Lie
  23. #Ms A For Accommodating Agreeable Ainsthorpe Has Given Wrong Advice To Shyster Shane Hunter Of Purpose Of Today
  24. #Shyster Shane Now Questions The False Fact He Has Just Confirmed That I Had Not Responded When In Fact I Had
  25. #Klutz Kluck Now Returns To His Real Agenda To Rid Himself Of This Problem
  26. #EDITORIAL_Of Reason Klutz Kluck Wants To Be Rid Of This Case
  27. #After Previously Refusing Accommodation Of My Special Needs Klutz Kluck Now Admits Justice Is Not Being Done
  28. #Klutz Kluck Tries To Blame Me For His Denial Of My Special Needs By Saying I Am Not Doing Justice To Myself
  29. #Shyster Shane Refers To Section 613 Queensland Criminal Code
  30. #Kluck States He Thinks I Have A Neurological Impairment
  31. #Shyster Shane Now Mentions My Resounding Victory In The Court Of Appeal On 20th July 2010
  32. #Shyster Shane Hunter States I Appeared In The Court Of Appeal To Argue My Appeal Albeit By Telephone
  33. #Klutz Kluck States He Would Not Like Me To Be Held In Custody
  34. #And Brought Before The Court Each  Day
  35. #Shyster Shane Believes I Should Be Present At Least By Phone To Hear His Submission On Whether I Should Be Refered To The District Court
  36. #Shyster Shane States That I Am Refusing To Come To Court
  37. #Kluck The Klutz States He Has Placed Each And Every Email Of Mine On The Record
  38. #Kluck Qualifies That To The Emails Of Which He Knows So No Doubt A Reference To Todays Of Which He Is Feigning Ignorance
  39. #Shyster Shane Now Canvasses The Possibility Of My Being Excluded From My Trial BECAUSE _I _AM _DISABLED. _THAT _IS _AN _OUTRAGE
  40. #Klutz Kluck Then Considers If He Could Exclude Me From The Committal Hearing For Contempt Of Court
  41. #Klutz Kluck Admits That Is A Drastic Step In The Case Of Disability But Still Considered It
  42. #Klutz Kluck Says No Normal Person Would Be Behaving Like This So Something Is Wrong
  43. #Klutz Kluck Admits He Cannot Insist On My Being Legally Represented
  44. #Kluts Kluck Admits He Cannot Insist On My Having A McKenzie Friend
  45. #Klutz Kluck Is Perplexed
  46. #Klutz Kluck Says Most Normal Persons Would Show Respect For The Court And Appear  
  47. #Shyster Shane Again Mentions Case Of My Friend Megumi Ogawa Who Was Denied Justice In The District Court
  48. #Shyster Shane Perpetuates The Lie That Threats Were Made To The Federal Court Registry
  49. #Shyster Shane Hunter Wants Me Formally Threatened By The Court With Arrest
  50. #Kluck The Klutz Advises That In The Past I Have Taken Such Threats As Intimidation
  51. #Kluck The Klutz Advises That In The Past I Have Taken Such As Not Respecting My Disability
  52. #Kluck The Klutz States That In The Past I Have Gone Off On Another Stream Of Abusive Emails
  53. #Klutz Kluck Decides He Should Ask Me If I Am Raising The Question Of My Fitness To Be Tried
  54. #Klutz Kluck Stays That I Write Back And Say I Am Fit  To Be Tried And I Am Going To Win [I am unaware of saying that.]
  55. #Klutz Kluck Says That As I Am Not Legally Represented The Question Of My Fitness To Be Tried Must Be Raised By Me Or Shyster Shane
  56. #Klutz Kluck Then States That The Court Can Think For Itself
  57. #This Suggests That Klutz Kluck Thinks He Can Extend The Legislation
  58. #Shyster Shane Hunter Raises The Relevant Precedent Case On Fitness To Stand Trial Of R v Presser
  59. #Kluck Thinks Presser Case Considers Mental And Physical DISABILITIES
  60. #Shyster Shane Then Presumes To Tell Klutz Kluck What Should Now Occur
  61. #Klutz Kluick Asks Shyster Shane If An Email Response From Me Will Be Sufficient Response
  62. #Shyster Shane Advises That An Email Response From Me Will Be Sufficient Response
  63. #Shyster Shane And Klutz Kluck Want My Views On The Question Of My Fitness To Stand Trial Emailed To Them
  64. #Shyster Shane Asks If Bail Act Provision Of Remanding Me In Custody For The Purpose Of A Psychiatriatric Examination Might Be Appropriate
  65. #Shyster Shane And Klutz Kluck Show Their Ignorance Of What They Are Doing In Discussion
  66. #These Two Rare Talents Thank Each Other Yet Again


includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php includedMenuMagistratesCourtsCorruptPoliceRantalaTranscripts.php

Menu: Truncated Committal Hearing re Corrupt Police Henri Elias Rantala,

Brisbane Magistrates Court, 24th, 25th & 28th June, 2010 coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

Transcripts of Hearing days on which witnesses gave evidence, with Summaries as Menus of Anchors/Markers:

  1. Summary of this Case of Fraud by Queensland Police &Commonwealth DPP
  2. Index:
  3. *Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  4. *Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  5. *Day 3: 28th June, 2010

Transcripts of related Mentions, after the truncation of the committal; ['*' preceding links below means that that transcript is preceded by  a 'Summary' which is a Menu of Anchors/Markers:]

  1. Day 00:   9th June, 2010
  2. *Day 04: 29th June, 2010
  3. *Day 05: 30th June, 2010
  4. *Day 06:     1st July, 2010
  5. *Day 07:    9th July, 2010
  6. *Day 08: 10th August, 2010
  7. *Day 09:    1st September, 2010
  8. *Day 10:   8th September, 2010
  9.  * Day 11: 15th September, 2010
  10. Day 12: 22th September, 2010
  11. Day 13: 24th September, 2010

Transcripts for Pre-Trial Mentions, coram various magistrates:

  1. Day A: 14th September, 2009
  2. Day B: 2nd November, 2009
  3. Day C: 25th January, 2010
  4. Day D: 15th March, 2010.

MenuAnchorsDayXX

Future Summary of this Transcript  [which appears below] of Brisbane Magistrates Court, MENTION on 8th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck.

  1. #Corrupt_Rantala_Brisbane_Magistrates_Co
  2. #Day Of Hearing Title
  3. #Day Of Month
  4. #Defendant Name
  5. #Defendant Title
  6. #Indictment Number
  7. #Indictment Year
  8. #Judge Surname
  9. #Judge Title
  10. #Jurisdiction
  11. #Location
  12. #Month
  13. #Plaintiff Name
  14. #Plaintiff Title
  15. #Year
  16. #Kluck_appoints_Clare_Jarvis_to_be_the_recorder
  17. #Klutz Magistrate Paul M Kluck Quickly Sets The Stage With False Fact That No Response From Me
  18. #My Editorial Listing The Link To My Actual Email Response Two Days Earlier    ====>>>    /My Actual Email Sent TWO DAYS Earlier Kluck  Hunter Lied And Denied.php#Two Days Earlier
  19. Shyster Shane Hunter LaterAdmits in Writing that it was received when sent. & in particular Click HERE & Click HERE
  20. #Kluck Quickly Obtains Statement From Shyster Shane Of No Response From Me So Shyster Shane Hunter Cannot Retract
  21. #Shyster Shane Is Now Locked Into That Lie
  22. #Klutz Kluck Traps Shyster Shane Hunter In The Lie
  23. #Ms A For Accommodating Agreeable Ainsthorpe Has Given Wrong Advice To Shyster Shane Hunter Of Purpose Of Today
  24. #Shyster Shane Now Questions The False Fact He Has Just Confirmed That I Had Not Responded When In Fact I Had
  25. #Klutz Kluck Now Returns To His Real Agenda To Rid Himself Of This Problem
  26. #EDITORIAL_Of Reason Klutz Kluck Wants To Be Rid Of This Case
  27. #After Previously Refusing Accommodation Of My Special Needs Klutz Kluck Now Admits Justice Is Not Being Done
  28. #Klutz Kluck Tries To Blame Me For His Denial Of My Special Needs By Saying I Am Not Doing Justice To Myself
  29. #Shyster Shane Refers To Section 613 Queensland Criminal Code
  30. #Kluck States He Thinks I Have A Neurological Impairment
  31. #Shyster Shane Now Mentions My Resounding Victory In The Court Of Appeal On 20th July 2010
  32. #Shyster Shane Hunter States I Appeared In The Court Of Appeal To Argue My Appeal Albeit By Telephone
  33. #Klutz Kluck States He Would Not Like Me To Be Held In Custody
  34. #And Brought Before The Court Each  Day
  35. #Shyster Shane Believes I Should Be Present At Least By Phone To Hear His Submission On Whether I Should Be Refered To The District Court
  36. #Shyster Shane States That I Am Refusing To Come To Court
  37. #Kluck The Klutz States He Has Placed Each And Every Email Of Mine On The Record
  38. #Kluck Qualifies That To The Emails Of Which He Knows So No Doubt A Reference To Todays Of Which He Is Feigning Ignorance
  39. #Shyster Shane Now Canvasses The Possibility Of My Being Excluded From My Trial BECAUSE _I _AM _DISABLED. _THAT _IS _AN _OUTRAGE
  40. #Klutz Kluck Then Considers If He Could Exclude Me From The Committal Hearing For Contempt Of Court
  41. #Klutz Kluck Admits That Is A Drastic Step In The Case Of Disability But Still Considered It
  42. #Klutz Kluck Says No Normal Person Would Be Behaving Like This So Something Is Wrong
  43. #Klutz Kluck Admits He Cannot Insist On My Being Legally Represented
  44. #Kluts Kluck Admits He Cannot Insist On My Having A McKenzie Friend
  45. #Klutz Kluck Is Perplexed
  46. #Klutz Kluck Says Most Normal Persons Would Show Respect For The Court And Appear  
  47. #Shyster Shane Again Mentions Case Of My Friend Megumi Ogawa Who Was Denied Justice In The District Court
  48. #Shyster Shane Perpetuates The Lie That Threats Were Made To The Federal Court Registry
  49. #Shyster Shane Hunter Wants Me Formally Threatened By The Court With Arrest
  50. #Kluck The Klutz Advises That In The Past I Have Taken Such Threats As Intimidation
  51. #Kluck The Klutz Advises That In The Past I Have Taken Such As Not Respecting My Disability
  52. #Kluck The Klutz States That In The Past I Have Gone Off On Another Stream Of Abusive Emails
  53. #Klutz Kluck Decides He Should Ask Me If I Am Raising The Question Of My Fitness To Be Tried
  54. #Klutz Kluck Stays That I Write Back And Say I Am Fit  To Be Tried And I Am Going To Win [I am unaware of saying that.]
  55. #Klutz Kluck Says That As I Am Not Legally Represented The Question Of My Fitness To Be Tried Must Be Raised By Me Or Shyster Shane
  56. #Klutz Kluck Then States That The Court Can Think For Itself
  57. #This Suggests That Klutz Kluck Thinks He Can Extend The Legislation
  58. #Shyster Shane Hunter Raises The Relevant Precedent Case On Fitness To Stand Trial Of R v Presser
  59. #Kluck Thinks Presser Case Considers Mental And Physical DISABILITIES
  60. #Shyster Shane Then Presumes To Tell Klutz Kluck What Should Now Occur
  61. #Klutz Kluick Asks Shyster Shane If An Email Response From Me Will Be Sufficient Response
  62. #Shyster Shane Advises That An Email Response From Me Will Be Sufficient Response
  63. #Shyster Shane And Klutz Kluck Want My Views On The Question Of My Fitness To Stand Trial Emailed To Them
  64. #Shyster Shane Asks If Bail Act Provision Of Remanding Me In Custody For The Purpose Of A Psychiatriatric Examination Might Be Appropriate
  65. #Shyster Shane And Klutz Kluck Show Their Ignorance Of What They Are Doing In Discussion
  66. #These Two Rare Talents Thank Each Other Yet Again


http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

xt of Transcript

Corrupt Police Rantala, Brisbane Magistrates Court, 'Mention', 8th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

MAGISTRATES COURT

KLUCK, Magistrate


MAG-00171907/09(9)


CROWN

Complainant


and



RUSSELL GORDON HAIG MATHEWS

Defendant


BRISBANE


..DATE 08/09/2010


MR HUNTER: Good morning, your Honour.

 

 

[EDITORIAL:  It is conveinient for Klutz Magistrate Paul M Kluck to ignore my response to the Magistrates Court.  I had responded to both Kluck and Hunter two days earlier and that response is now online.]  
BENCH: Yes, I'll take the continuation of the matter of

Russell Gordon Haig Mathews. I appoint Clare Jarvis to be the

recorder and I have before me Mr Hunter for the Commonwealth

director, and I have no defendant, and had no response from

communication sent by the Court to Mr Mathews. Do you know

anything different, Mr Hunter?


MR HUNTER: No, your Honour. I was given to understand that

today was set aside to conduct the so-called shuttle to

establish-----


BENCH: No, not to conduct it. No, it was for Mr Mathews to

respond to an E-mail sent through the Registry as to of exact

special measures he requested to have the hearing continue,

with particular reference to the cross-examination of

witnesses.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: To respond by E-mail to that request.


MR HUNTER: And he hasn't done so to the Court?

 
[EDITORIAL:  As this case has become too much of a problem for Magistrate Klutz Kluck, he wishes to rid himself of it.  It is a problem for him as he has denied me Due Process by not fulfiling his Duty to give me a Fair Hearing, because he has refused to Acccommodate My Special Needs due to my disabilities.  The purported Committal hearing has long ago become a nullity, a nothingness, a figment of imagination.  Klutz Kluck wants to rid himself of this by referring the case to the District Court on any spurious grounds.  Section20B of the Commonwealth Crimes Act 1914 makes provision for any case to be referred to the District Court for it to decide if the defendant is Fit to be Tried.  The problem Klutz Kluck has is that this question must be raised by the defendant, the prosecution or the lawyer for the defendant.  Klutz Kluck fabricates the raising of such a question.  He repeatedly asks the prosecutor Shyster Shane Hunter if he is raising the question.  Shyster Shane repeatedly denies that he is raising the question.]

BENCH: He hasn't done so. But I want to revisit the issue of

fitness for trial in section 20B of the Crimes Act.


MR HUNTER: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH: Is there anything you wish to say about that?


MR HUNTER: I do. Fitness for trial is predicated, if you

like, on the defendant's ability to understand the charge

against him.


BENCH: Well, it goes to more than that, I think.


MR HUNTER: And to give instructions to a lawyer, if

necessary.


BENCH: Yes, but it goes further than that.


MR HUNTER: And to defend himself.

 

BENCH: It goes further than that, I would think. If - and

he's raised the issue. He's saying that because of his brain

stem injury, when the pressure's on he can't stand and

concentrate and ask questions. Justice is not being done.

He's not doing justice to himself, and therefore I'll have to

seriously consider whether he's raising the issue of whether

he's fit to be tried. It's not fitness to plead in terms of

the legislation.


MR HUNTER: No, it's fitness to be tried.


BENCH: It's fitness to be tried.


MR HUNTER: Yes, but the definition, with reference to section

613 of the Queensland Criminal Code, my recollection is that

there are a number of annotations in Carters under section 613

which is the procedure, trial by Judge and jury to establish

the issue, to consider the issue of fitness to be tried. That

there are certain indicia set out as to what constitutes

fitness to be tried.


BENCH: Well, that will be a matter for the District Court if

it's referred.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: If I refer to, which I must refer it-----


MR HUNTER: You must refer it if it's been raised.


BENCH: -----if I consider it's been raised. Well, I think - I

think it is being raised by him in his correspondence. If you

carefully consider it and read it.


MR HUNTER: Your Honour, I'm just not prepared to probably

argue this issue right at this moment.


BENCH: No, no, and I'm not really asking you to argue it

today, but I think it's a question that needs to be-----


MR HUNTER: Well, I'll be prepared to argue it a bit later on

today, if I can get a couple of hours to go and have a look at

it.


BENCH: No, well, I'll have to put it over for another day

because I'll have to give Mr Mathews then further notice and

it seems that there being no E-mail correspondence, it seems

that Mr Mathews neither wants to come in here in person, by

telephone, or now by E-mail. So it may well be the case that

he has to be arrested and brought before the Court and then

formally referred and given bail, or let go at large under the

Bail Act, where a person - where the Court considers that he

has a neurological impairment, which I think he has - the

evidence before me. I understand what you're saying, it's not

recent evidence, but there is evidence.


MR HUNTER: Yes. Query though, on the 20th of July this year

he appeared in the Court of Appeal to argue an appeal, albeit

by telephone.


BENCH: Well, I think it's quite recognised that fitness for

trial ebbs and flows.


MR HUNTER: Yes, true.


BENCH: It comes and goes.


MR HUNTER: Query, what does that leave then, the status of

the current committal proceedings?

BENCH: Well-----


MR HUNTER: If he's found to be fit?


BENCH: Well, it simply is, in effect, stayed.


MR HUNTER: It's stayed, yes.


BENCH: Until the District Court, if it's referred to the

District Court - and you know, I'm still open to-----


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: -----the argument on that, but if it is referred, well

effectively the committal's stayed, in terms of the

legislation.


MR HUNTER: Yes. Well, I would like-----


BENCH: Because I can't see any way through it. I mean, other

than arrest him - if he's arrested and brought before the

Court - you know, I would not like to have him held in

custody.


MR HUNTER: No.


BENCH: And brought before the Court each day until the

committal's over. I don't think that would be proper to do

that, when I have this issue about fitness to be tried.


MR HUNTER: Yes. When is your Honour available to hear

submissions from the Crown on this? I would be prepared to do

it later today if-----


BENCH: It's just - no, I don't think - look, I'll give you

more than that. I could put it over for another week if you

like.


MR HUNTER: And Mr Mathews will - should be present at least

by telephone to hear this.


BENCH: Yes, but that's the issue, isn't it?


MR HUNTER: He's refusing to come.


BENCH: He's clammed up, basically.


MR HUNTER: Yes. Selectively, the Crown would say.

  

BENCH: And it's all on the - it's all on the record. It's

all on the record. I've placed all - each and every E-mail

that I know of, on the record - on the file. And it just

seems that there being no E-mail correspondence on file this

morning, that he does not even wish to communicate in that

manner. Like I say, it may be the case that if there's simply

no communication, the warrant has to be released and he be

arrested.

MR HUNTER: Well, if your Honour is minded to adjourn for a

short period for the Crown to make submissions on the section

20B issue, that Mr Mathews be notified of that and-----


BENCH: But I - but see - yeah, I understand what you're

saying - and I'll give you that opportunity - but I think

strict terms of the legislation, once the question's raised,

the Court's got to refer it.


MR HUNTER: But it's the issue of the question.


BENCH: And if I consider that he's raised it-----


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: -----I'm referring it.


MR HUNTER: Well, the Crown would like to - an opportunity

to-----


BENCH: Yes.


MR HUNTER: To actually explore whether or not it has been.


BENCH: Yes.


MR HUNTER: But in any event-----


BENCH: But what you'll have to do - and you've got all those

E-mails, haven't you?


MR HUNTER: Yes. Well, as far as I know, because he generally

sends them to everyone, including the Attorney-General.


BENCH: See, you've got to look at it from the point of view

of whether he can properly cross-examine witnesses.


MR HUNTER: Well, I notice there's 143 pages of transcript

from day two - or day three of the committal.


BENCH: Yes. But, like I said, fitness to be tried ebbs and

flows - comes and goes. It's not a static sort of thing.

Once somebody's found to be fit to be tried, well that's the

end of it forever and a day.


MR HUNTER: Yes, and-----


BENCH: That's not the case.


MR HUNTER: And the difficulty is, that if the District Court

finds him fit to be tried, we're back here for possibly two

hours and he says oh, I can't - I can't go on. So the

matter's been raised again. We go back to the District Court.


BENCH: Yes, I know. But that's looking - that's looking

ahead. That's sort of - that hasn't been determined yet.


MR HUNTER: No. No. Very well.


BENCH: I mean, fitness to be tried is not somebody who's so

obviously mentally ill and their conduct is so outrageous that

it's obvious that they're not fit to be tried.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: A person can stand before a Court and ask questions on

one day, but then the next day not show up and say, "Look, I

can't, because of my injury. Because of my brain injury I

can't concentrate. When the pressure's on, I've got to go

away and do something else and then come back." Well, you

can't operate like that. You can't run a committal-----


MR HUNTER: No.


BENCH: -----let alone a trial like that, so therefore that's

the issue. Is he fit to be tried?


MR HUNTER: The issue then might be, if it was a trial,

whether or not section 617(2) would be relevant. In that the

conduct of the accused may warrant him being excluded from his

trial.


BENCH: But that's for a trial.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: I'm not sure how it goes for committals.


MR HUNTER: No. In fact, section 104 of the Justices Act

requires his presence for committal proceeding.


BENCH: There may be some way you can exclude somebody if

they're showing contempt.


MR HUNTER: That's right. That's the rider in section 617.


BENCH: But contempt can mean failing to obey Court directions

by - to appear personally.


MR HUNTER: Yes. And-----


BENCH: But, you know, that's a drastic step to take, when

you've got this surrounding issue of mental health and brain

stem injury. There's no easy way out of it, I don't think.


MR HUNTER: No.


BENCH: But quite clearly, no normal person would be behaving

like this. There is something wrong.


MR HUNTER: Possibly.


BENCH: You cannot insist upon somebody being legally

represented.


MR HUNTER: Correct.


BENCH: You can't insist upon someone having a McKenzie's

friend.


MR HUNTER: Correct.


BENCH: That's not normal behaviour.


MR HUNTER: No, but then neither is-----


BENCH: Most normal person would show respect to the Court and

appear.


MR HUNTER: Yes. Well, there was a recent Commonwealth case

called Ogawa where such was not the case, and she was actually

excluded from her trial because of her conduct.


BENCH: That's on a trial.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: Was that process gone through about fitness to be

tried?


MR HUNTER: It was considered in that case that Miss Ogawa was

feigning her condition and deliberately setting about to

disrupt the Court proceedings.


BENCH: But there may not have been any evidence about mental

health.


MR HUNTER: Oh, yes, there was.


BENCH: There was.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: But that was an exercise the trial Court went through?


MR HUNTER: No, she was - that particular - the issue of her

fitness to be tried wasn't tried under section 20B.


BENCH: They were Commonwealth matters?


MR HUNTER: It was, yes. Similar to these, actually.


BENCH: Right. Oh, I think I'm aware of the case you're

talking about.


MR HUNTER: Threats were made to the Federal Court Registry

and this was a woman who attempted to disrobe in the

courtroom, screamed at the Judge.


BENCH: But there was evidence of mental health?


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: Or mental health issues.


MR HUNTER: It was considered not sufficient to warrant

section 20B, this position, as I understand it. In any event,

we're at an impasse at the moment.


BENCH: Yes.


MR HUNTER: His refusal to even respond to E-mails puts us in

a situation where, if your Honour is minded to stand it down

for a short period of time, to allow me time to have a look at

what the law is on section 20B and 613 I think of the

code-----


BENCH: One week?


MR HUNTER: A week would be fine and that he be notified that

that's what the purpose of the next mention will be, and that

he should be - he should respond by E-mail accordingly.

Because if he doesn't respond, how can your Honour make the

order?


BENCH: Well, that's right, that's what I alluded to before.

If he doesn't - if he doesn't communicate in any way, well the

warrant will have to be released.


MR HUNTER: Yes, and he should be warned of that in today's

correspondence.


BENCH: Well, of course, what's happened in the past, he has

been warned and he's taking that as intimidation.


MR HUNTER: Yes.

 

BENCH: Not respecting his disability, and he goes off on

another extreme of abusive E-mails, but - no, but that's not a

reason not to do it. Because you must - people must be warned

of the consequences of failing to comply with Court

directions.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: But - so on the next date, say, it's the 15th, a week

today.


MR HUNTER: 15th.


BENCH: Would you - is that suitable?


MR HUNTER: Yes. I think so, your Honour.


BENCH: Would you - what would you require, at least an

indication - well, perhaps I should raise it with him. Have

the Registry send an E-mail to him.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: About whether he is raising the issue of fitness to be

tried.


MR HUNTER: Yes. Although reading - reading his E-mails-----

KlutzKluck

BENCH: The problem is though if he writes back and says, "No,

I'm fit to be tried and I'm going to win."-----


MR HUNTER: Well, that then - that's only one side - that's

only a submission which your Honour can reject or accept.


BENCH: Well, in strict terms of the legislation it's got to

be raised by you, the Prosecutor, him, or his legal

representative. So we don't have a legal representative, we

only have the prosecution and the person himself.


MR HUNTER: Yes.

 

BENCH: But I think the Court can think for itself.


MR HUNTER: But in the interests of-----


BENCH: Justice.


MR HUNTER: In the interests of justice the Crown would be

duty bound, if it considered that the evidence before your

Honour was sufficient to warrant a section 20B, then that's

what we would submit.


BENCH: Oh, yes, I would think - would expect that, but-----


MR HUNTER: But perhaps in the interim - I think the name of

the case is Presser, P-R-E-S-S-E-R.


BENCH: Yes.


MR HUNTER: And there are a number of indicia set out in that

which I'd just like to have a look at.


BENCH: I think Presser talks about mental and physical

disabilities as well, doesn't it?


MR HUNTER: Yes. In any event, next-----

KlutzKluckAsksShysterShanneWhatHeRequires FromMe

BENCH: But will you require - what would the least - what

would be the least you require as far as communication from

him?


MR HUNTER: Well, that he be notified that the matter has been

adjourned to next Wednesday for the purpose of submissions

with respect to whether or not section 20B is the appropriate

disposition for the matter at the moment. That he should

appear either in person or by telephone, and a failure to

respond in any way may - well, will result-----


BENCH: Including E-mail?


MR HUNTER: Including E-mail.


BENCH: See, he may well respond. He may - you see, I think

this issue of the shuttle is still live in his mind.


MR HUNTER: Well, that he be invited to respond-----


BENCH: By E-mail.


MR HUNTER: -----to his suggestion that - by E-mail - that

section 20B should be the appropriate disposition at this

time, and if he has any submissions he can file them in

writing by E-mail and that failure to respond will result in

the warrant being issued - being released.


BENCH: Yes. All right. I think that's the best way to go.

So the warrant will continue to lie on the file until the

matter is next mentioned in Court 20.


MR HUNTER: Court 20, yes.


BENCH: At 9 a.m. on the 15th of September, and notification

in those terms will be sent to the defendant. Any other

issues you want to raise?


MR HUNTER: Just again without the benefit of having prepared,

the issue of his psychiatric condition would ordinarily be the

subject of expert evidence, on oath, in Court.


BENCH: Well, that's not going to happen in this Court, I

wouldn't think.


MR HUNTER: No, no, but the Crown can't require him to submit

and I just query whether or not that provision in the Bail Act

with respect to remanding in custody for the purposes of an

examination which he might be otherwise required to undertake

were he serving a sentence, might be appropriate, but I'm just

flagging that as being a possibility.


BENCH: But that's only - that could only be entertained if

he's - if the fail to appear warrant is released and he's then

brought before the Court, isn't it?


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: Yes. Then you get to the - I know we are skipping two

points - two steps ahead here - but if it is to be referred to

the District Court for the assessment as to whether he's fit

to be tried, then it becomes an issue of whether he has to be

before the Court physically, and then is he going to have

bail, or is he let go at large under the provision of the Bail

Act where the person has a neurological impairment.


MR HUNTER: Well, that would be a matter for the District

Court, I would have thought, although-----


BENCH: Well, it doesn't say that-----


MR HUNTER: -----when your Honour refers it under section 20B

to the District Court, it's not effectively a committal order

as such.


BENCH: No, it's a referral.


MR HUNTER: It's a referral.


BENCH: But it says-----


MR HUNTER: Can be granted bail.


BENCH: Well, it doesn't really say - well, it says that the

Court - the Magistrate may order the person charged be

detained in prison or in hospital for so long only as is

reasonably necessary to allow the Court to which the person is

referred to determine.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: The issue, but it doesn't - I would imagine you would

be able to grant a person bail.


MR HUNTER: It has happened before.


BENCH: What's that?


MR HUNTER: I can recall a matter where - I had a few years

ago where the matter was referred during - well, actually,

before the committal started, to the District Court and he was

granted bail on that occasion. Yes. In any event, we're

probably skipping ahead too far.


BENCH: Well, that's right.


MR HUNTER: But I'm just flagging the possibility that it's an

issue that your Honour may want to consider.


BENCH: But it may - well, it may be the case that that

happens and it comes back anyway. But I think Mr Mathews

can't say, if that happens, that this Court hasn't been alive

to that issue-----


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: -----of him being fit. But anyway, that's all we can

do today, so-----


MR HUNTER: Yes. Okay. Well, if we get a - some sort of

response, we'll work on that.


BENCH: Well, that may provoke a response, rather than just be

here to continue the committal.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: Calling for a response as to that issue, whether he's

fit to be tried. All right.


MR HUNTER: So 9 a.m.

BENCH: So 9 a.m., Court 20, 15 September and the warrant will

continue to lie then - until then.


MR HUNTER: We'll see you then, your Honour.


BENCH: Thank you, Mr Hunter.


MR HUNTER: Thank you.




THE COURT ADJOURNED


Fraud by Douglas Porter, The University of Queensland, [part of the Australian Government], by defrauding a disabled reclusive old man of his HOUSE & LAND; including Douglas Porter's being linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity

These pages will be developed to expose the defrauding of a disabled, and hence reclusive old man of his house and land at 254 Hawken Drive St Lucia [view MAP] by Douglas Porter, the previous Registrar of The University of Queensland, for use by The University of Queensland.  Douglas Porter had been attacking, bullying and discriminating against this disabled reclusive old man since the early 1990s when he was a mature age student at The University of Queensland.

Porter was closely associated with two others linked to the Attempted MURDER of the disabled old man, being the then recent law lecturers Quentin Bryce, and Patsy Mary Wolfe.  The disabled old man was, at that time, a student of law at the University of Queensland, where Porter was Registrar.  Porter was engaged in bullying 
the disabled old man prior to the Attempted Murder of the disabled old man, and subsequenly, but then with greater  gusto.   Douglas Porter, then, as clandstine Chair of the St Johns College Council, that ran the St Johns College on the St Lucia, Brisbane Campus of The University of Queensland, began to secretly orchestrate the theft of the home of the disabled old man; the house and land owned in trust by the disabled old man, to take advantage of the fact that the disabled old man was under a strident attack..  

LinkToAspinallInPorterPanel.php This Profile Panel re the parasitic Douglas Porter, rewarded by the anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall and the anglican church, because Porter used confidential information obtained as Registrar of The University of Queensland, to assist Phillip Aspinall steal the home of a vulnerable disabled guy links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud of this vulnerable disabled guy by anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall.

  Douglas PORTER is linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity.
See fat pig parasite Porter playing with himself

  masturbating

in his office. So, what can you expect from The University of Queensland?
Write and tell us what you think about this University.
  Douglas Porter taken at 9:55AM 12th July, 2006 in his office at The University of Queensland where he was at that time, Registrar of The University of Queensland, and also clandestinely, the Representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly Chairman of, the St Johns College Council which runs St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland.  For years prior and years since then, Porter was secretly scheming to steal my home, beneficially owned by me, from me, by threatening and manipulating the emotionally challenged emotional shell of the trustee.

Concurrently, while I was then a student at the Universiity of Queensland, Douglas Porter, as Registrar, repeatedly discriminated against me in relation to my use of the libraries and my being accompanied by my two wee assistance dogs while on the campus of UQ.

Just days before the armed robbery on me on 29th November, 2004, by corrupt cop [and Armed Robber] at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, as a preliminary and integral step towards stealing my property [my home, my beneficially owned house and land], from me, all orchestrated by Douglas Porter, Douglas Porter had that same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala charge me with bogus criminal charges. No doubt this was intended to complicate my life even more than my life was being complicated, on top of my disabilities, by all the Douglas Porter inspired disability discrimination of me in UQ libraries, so making the theft of my home even easier for The University of Queensland.


We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this intellectual lightweight and corrupt gutless parasite .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 .   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 . 

Douglas Porter was The University of Queensland's SECRETIVE/CLANDESTINE representative, [and Chair], on the Governing body of one college, St Johns College at the University of Queensland - [see 7th paragraph of this linked UQ publication] or our copy.   [Of course, The University of Queensland has complete control of that land on which the college is built, with its complicated legal arrangement.]  The Governing body is called the the St Johns College Council [SJCC] and Douglas Porter is the Chair of the SJCC. Important in the workings of St Johns College and the St Johns College Council, is the SJCC Budget.  The Warden of St Johns College is the fraudster the Rev John Morgan.  He is answerable to the SJCC for the running of SJC.  In particular, he is petrified of his spending being in excess of the SJCC budget.  He even attempts to defraud to avoid spending money that is not in the SJCC budget.  Earlier that year, Morgan admitted lying to me the previous year, so that he would not have to face up to the St Johns College Council [SJCC], for having spent money that he was legally required to spend, that was, however, not in the SJCC budget.  

Hence, SJCC is a part of the Australian Government Sector, as is The University of Queensland.  Also involved in this fraud were other divisions of the Australian Public Sector, namely the Brisbane City Council, Queensland Police [including the most senior level, on the evidence of the Queensland Police], Queensland Courts especially Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and Supreme Court Judge Henry George Fryberg. Others were involved for the money they would make from it and to be "on the in" with corrupt public sector parasites.  These include lawyer Stephen Tonge, [view home of Tonge on MAP]  then a partner of Firm of lawyers Flower & Hart but more recently of Tress Cox.  Some Capital Funding was provided by the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church aka the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Paul de Jersey, is the Chancellor of the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC].  They provided the funding for an expected return [albeit fraudulent] of approximately 20% year on year plus a locked in Capital Gain well in excess of CPI indexation.

Because the Australian Government has been involved in defrauding this disabled reclusive old man, this matter, and his being defrauded of his Commonwealth Disability Support Pension by Centrelink, will end up coram/before UN committees in Geneva pursuant to Australia's acceding to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.   The Corrupt Australian Government and all parts of it involved in this widespread fraud should be greatly shamed and we will expose them.

The Queensland Court of Appeal, the highest court in Queensland, has recently spoken on this matter.  [It was written up in the Brisbane newspaper as "Talk of the Legal World".], However, there is far more to come.

RussellMathewsEmailSignatureDRA

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
International Disability Rights Advocate
invoking
UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
& UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
See my RESOUNDING VICTORY 20th July, 2010 in
Qld Court of Appeal

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of
      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND
Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]

linksforumworldrecession
Links to our FORUMS regarding the 21st Century World Recession, SURVIVING IT & PROSPERING.
  1. 21st Century World Recession
  2. Analysis of the 21st Century World Recession
  3. FULL detail of the Analysis of 21st Century World Recession
  4. How to SURVIVE the 21st Century World Recession, & PROSPER
  5. In detail: How to SURVIVE the 21st Century World Recession, & PROSPER.
  6. Looking for Work: Looking for a Job:
  7. How to FIND A JOB, & MAKE MONEY doing it!!
  8. FULL detail: How to FIND A JOB, & MAKE MONEY doing it!!
  9. FULL detail: How to FIND A JOB, & MAKE MONEY FINDING it, and REAL MONEY doing it!!
  10. FULL DETAIL: Looking for Work: Looking for a Job:
  11. Small Business Advisory FORUM
  12. Full Description, Small Business Advisory Forum.
I have addressed this way forward, depending upon one's predilection, based on one's past actions or inclinations: Income from working for an 'employer' or working in one's own business.

  1. Looking for Work: Looking for a Job: How to FIND A JOB, & MAKE MONEY doing it!!
  2. Small Business Advisory FORUM
HaigReport Themes

Themes of  Websites
for the
HAIG   REPORT: Group of Websites:
[We expect, in time, to have all of the thousands of pages on the
HAIG   REPORT: group of websites accessible from this Menu of THEMES. Eventually, there will be 20 themes, each with an average of 15 to 20 websites/domains/directories, with each website/domain having an average of 20 pages. This would equate to 20 x (15 to 20) x 20 = 6,000 to 8,000 pages. This menu of Themes will be included near the bottom of each page, in time. With one line of code, strategically placed, this Menu of Themes is now on thousands of pages. We are continually and progressively adding pages to this Menu of Themes of website Menus.]

commonheader.php

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.  
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      EMAIL us anytime:  Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay. 

Menu: HaigReport'sThemes or Categories of the the Topics of the HaigReport Group of Websites: 
© COPYRIGHT: Russell Gordon Haig Mathews 2002 - 2018

The LATEST ADDITIONS are added to the top:


See  All 67 Domain Names in the HaigReport Group 

© COPYRIGHT: Russell Gordon Haig Mathews 2002 - 2018

Now here are the THEMES:



  1. Commonwealth of Australia Knowingly Employs LIARS, CHEATS and CRIMINALS:


  2. Government Corruption Infecting Corporates; ASX:


  3. New ADDITIONAL platform; Printed Distributed HaigReport NEWSPAPER:


  4. Self Help Law: Do your own Legals/Law:


  5. International: Corrupt Politics & Corrupt religion:


  6. About HaigReport Group of Websites including
    Vote One Russell Mathews:


  7. Russell Mathews [BCom BSc LLB & BA] Commentary additional to the rest of these Websites:


  8. Legal Rights, & BLACKLISTS of parasite residents & tenants in rental accommodation:


  9. RAMPANT POLICE CORRUPTION Exposed by HaigReport Websites; Publicize Your Complaint Here:


  10. Other public sector corruption Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  11. RELIGION Corruption CRIME & PAEDOPHILIA Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  12. Qld Govt Translink wankers & pony spankers Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  13. Corrupt JUDGES, COURTS, & TRIBUNALS Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  14. Corrupt LAWYERS Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  15. Corrupt POLITICANS Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  16. University of Qld Fraud & Corruption Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  17. Corruption at other universities; Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  18. Expose' of Other CORRUPTION, including TELSTRA, under influence of public sector parasites, as exposed by the HaigReport Group of Websites:


  19. Business Promoted by HaigReport Websites:


  20. Finance by HaigReport Websites:

This page is part of the Internet presence of

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
View list of SOME of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html


SEE WHAT I PLAN TO DO ABOUT IT!


Image
CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE