HAIG    REPORT:    GoTo [on this page] HaigReport's Menu Of Themes of Menus for our thousands of pages
TIPS for
Navigating HaigReport:  If you arrived at this page, referred from a Search Engine such as Google et al, your URL link will NOT have an #Anchor/Marker to take you to the relevant spot on this page.  In that case, we do recommend that you view our "Latest HaigReport Promotions" of recent additions to our websites, by Clicking Here.  It will open in a new Browser window. 

If
you Click Here, you will be taken, usually, to the specific Unique Content on this page, for which you were most likely seeking.  However, if you Click Here, you will be taken to the Top of the HaigReport Header, below on this page. 

However, if you have arrived at this page from another of our Website pages, your link will usually have an #Anchor, also called a marker, which will take you to the intended specific spot on the page where that marker is positioned.  In fact, it will probably take you there prior to your reading this.  Moving to that Anchor is the final step in the loading of this page.

 HAIG     REPORT:   Is now on  twitter  [from 2nd June, 2013]  link to us HERE on twitter     See our Twitter Strategy    

 HAIG    REPORT:  SEE: Russell Mathews' COMMENTARY:    Russell Mathews' [BCom BSc LLB & BA] current TOPICAL commentary on GOVERNMENT, politics & business     Press to READ       Press for MENU   

 HAIG    REPORT:    WANTED:
Healthy female "dog" to breed with Parson Russell Terrier, to produce ASSISTANCE DOGS.   Rochedale South QLD 4123
I wish to breed from my Parson Russell Terrier. He is a trained assistance dog. He has a wonderful nature. The breed of his mate could be varied or a cross; eg Parson Russell Terrier, Jack Russell Terrier, Beagle, Bull Terrier, Bull mastiff, Staffy, and/or Fox Terrier plus many others. She does not need to be "pedigreed". I am very protective of my dogs. She will become very valuable to me and become one of my assistance "dogs". If we can assist each other, please contact me on my contact form, including your email address and your landline phone number so I can phone you to discuss. 

Because I am disabled and have an LLB [so therefore understand the Law surrounding disabilities and assistance dogs] I am now branching out to providing Assistance dogs to disabled persons [even if disabled in only a minor way and so not even realizing it]. This is not a business proposition but rather just a very necessary service I can offer to the community.
Many people have a disability and do not realize their ailment or "problem" is by law, the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA], classified as a "disability". This is especially so for people getting on in years, and who have a dog, and are maybe moving to accommodation where they are told they cannot take their dog. In a majority of cases, those people cannot be legally forced to surrender their animal/dog.
I will be assisting those person who already have dogs, but are being forced, unlawfully, to dispose of them because maybe they are moving accommodation. I can train your existing dogs to be assistance dogs and provide the documentation as required by the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA]. I do not intend to charge for this, but just maybe cover some marginal costs.

    View the Latest    HAIG     REPORT Promotions:  in this Scrolling Window, or OPEN in new browser:     

 Click here  to Learn how your Personalized Alert Notice [IMMEDIATELY ABOVE] is prepared by our HAIG Unique Visitor Algorithm: [HUVA] or  Click here  to see your UNIQUE Personalized Alert Notice in a new Browser Window.


Index: Corrupt Police Rantala Magistrates Court Transcripts, Day 11:


My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies. The HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies.

   It is Our legal, social and moral DUTY to EXPOSE CRIME, FRAUD & CORRUPTION plus Lying and Hypocrisy in Public Life, Including Judges & magistrates 
 

Fraud, Corruption & attempted  MURDER 
covered-up by Queensland police, EXPOSED 

header: Rhodes BLOOD MONEY Scholarship Scandal & Fraud:

Transcripts: Corrupt Police in Court:
Australian Government Steals Disabled Old Man's home for The University of Queensland to punish Disabled Old Man for being DISABLED

commonheader.php

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.  
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      EMAIL us anytime:  Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay. 

Text of Transcript

Corrupt Police Rantala, Brisbane Magistrates Court, 'Mention', 15th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS


includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php includedMenuMagistratesCourtsCorruptPoliceRantalaTranscripts.php

Menu: Truncated Committal Hearing re Corrupt Police Henri Elias Rantala,

Brisbane Magistrates Court, 24th, 25th & 28th June, 2010 coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

Transcripts of Hearing days on which witnesses gave evidence, with Summaries as Menus of Anchors/Markers:

  1. Summary of this Case of Fraud by Queensland Police &Commonwealth DPP
  2. Index:
  3. *Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  4. *Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  5. *Day 3: 28th June, 2010

Transcripts of related Mentions, after the truncation of the committal; ['*' preceding links below means that that transcript is preceded by  a 'Summary' which is a Menu of Anchors/Markers:]

  1. Day 00:   9th June, 2010
  2. *Day 04: 29th June, 2010
  3. *Day 05: 30th June, 2010
  4. *Day 06:     1st July, 2010
  5. *Day 07:    9th July, 2010
  6. *Day 08: 10th August, 2010
  7. *Day 09:    1st September, 2010
  8. *Day 10:   8th September, 2010
  9.  * Day 11: 15th September, 2010
  10. Day 12: 22th September, 2010
  11. Day 13: 24th September, 2010

Transcripts for Pre-Trial Mentions, coram various magistrates:

  1. Day A: 14th September, 2009
  2. Day B: 2nd November, 2009
  3. Day C: 25th January, 2010
  4. Day D: 15th March, 2010.

MenuAnchorsDayXX

Summary of this Transcript  [which appears below] of Brisbane Magistrates Court, MENTION on 15th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck.

Firstly, we refer you to discussion of this day's transcript elsewhere on this website:

  1. AvengerRevengeRetributionTruth/MagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind20100915Hearing15thSeptember2010.php#MenuMagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind
  2. AvengerRevengeRetributionTruth/MagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind20100915Hearing15thSeptember2010.php#MagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind

& in particular:

  1. #Kluck Klutz Muddled Thinking
  2. #Kluck Admits He Denied Me A_Fair Hearing For Three Days
  3. #Mathews Allowed Extra Breaks
  4. #Allowed Assistance Dogs In Court
  5. #So Provided Special Measures ??????
  6. #Confused Logic Geometry Kluck Hunter: Lines vs Circles

Now, for the Anchors/markers in the transcript below:

  1. #MagistrateKluckAndShysterShaneRecognizeCommuniqueFromMe
  2. #KluckAttemptsToPrecisWhatI_HaveSaid
  3. #ItsGrossDisabilityDiscriminationOfCourtAndProsecutionoToDenyDisabledManReasonableAccommodationOfSpecialNeeds
  4. #Shyster Shane Hunter  RecognizesEffect Of My Brain Damage Disability
  5. #Shyster Shane Hunter Desperate Fraud & Desires Denial of my Special Needs As Dr Moyle stated 'Preferable' which Is Not 'Imperative'
  6. #ShysterShaneHunterAssertsNoReliefForDisabledPersonsUntilRigorousMedicalProofOfDisability
  7. #MagistrateKluckNOW_RecognizesI_HaveSpecialNeeds
  8. #MagistrateKluckRecognizesThereIsPrimaFacieEvidenceBeforeTheCourtThatI_HaveBrainInjury
  9. #Magistrate Kluck Admits He Knows I_Have Cross Examined Under Difficulty For Three Days
  10. #MagistrateKluckMakes False Assumption
  11. #This Is The Reason A_Formal Voir Dire Procedure Needs To Be Established
  12. #Shyster Shane Hunter Admits I_State I_Need My Special Needs Specially Accommodated


includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php includedCDDMenuAvengerRevengeRetribution.php includedSummaryCaseFraudPoliceAndCDPP.php

Summary of the case by the Criminal, corrupt & FRAUDULENT Qld police AGAINST Disabled Old Man

This is the case where corrupt police and a corrupt Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, attempt to use brute force, of police arrest and harassment to silence the disabled old man, to conceal how the Queensland police performed an Armed Robbery on him to Assist the Queensland Government defraud the disabled old man of his house and land that he owned and which was his home.

The disabled old man has brain damage caused by severe head injury when a teenager.  That affects his ability to "work" for any but short time periods.  He is able to concentrate for only short periods. This is near impossible for a casual observer to notice.  He quickly becomes fatigued and if he is forced to continue to try to concentrate, that results in mental exhaustion.  On the first day of hearing, knowing the disabled old man's disability and the nature of it, Magistrate Klutz ridiculed the disabled old man, even though the disabled old man was trying hard to accommodate what the Magistrate desired.   CLEARLY, THE DISABLED OLD MAN MUST REFUSE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS, UNLESS AND UNTIL HIS SPECIAL NEEDS CONSEQUENT UPON HIS DISABILITIES ARE FULLY ACCOMMODATED.   THIS IS ESSENTIAL IF HE IS TO RECEIVE DUE PROCESS.  THE ONUS IS UPON THE MAGISTRATE, JUDGE AND DECISION MAKER, TO ENSURE THAT THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS EXTENDED DUE PROCESS aka NATURAL JUSTICE.

THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS HAPPY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS PROVIDED HE RECEIVES DUE PROCESS. 

The real crux of this fraud upon the disabled old man and concurrently, UPON THE JUSTICE AND LEGAL SYSTEM OF QUEENSLAND AND AUSTRALIA, is that this disabled old man is being prosecuted in the most contemptuous way, to continue the EXPLOITATION OF HIS BEING DISABLED BY THE QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT, in that the Queensland Government, defrauded/stole from the disabled old man, the house and land that he owned that was his home, for the use of and by The University of Queensland.  The clandestine fraud was orchestrated by the Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  The fraud involved an ARMED ROBBERY of the disabled old man by Queensland Police in company with a Queensland government Authority, for the benefit of another Queensland Government authority viz, The University of Queensland. The case involved a fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man. The same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala also charged the disabled old man with other charges to favour The University of Queensland, who had been defrauding the disabled old man for years.  ..

Instead of the Australian government doing as it should to honour its International Commitments [
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]] to rail against exploitation of disabled persons, it is actually perpetuating, ITSELF, the exploitation of this disabled old man, because no doubt, the exploitation of the disabled old man was by the Queensland Government, and a number of parts of the Queensland Government in collusion.

This fraud of the disabled old man was orchestrated by Queensland Public Sector Parasite, Douglas Porter, when he was Registrar of The University of Queensland, for the benefit of The University of Queensland and to punish the disabled old man for standing up for his rights as a Disabled person, while at The University of Queensland.  Involved in the Porter perpetrated fraud was an ARMED ROBBERY by the Queensland Government being the Queensland police in particular corrupt cops Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony, of the disabled old man at his home together with a concurrent fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man by the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala.

The law confirms that the Armed Robbery by Henri EliasRantala and Monica Louise Antony, was actually a CRIMINAL
armed robbery. The factual evidence is also online.  The conduct constituting the armed robbery was not just accidental.   The perpetrators of the fraud, Queensland Public Sector parasites, set out to create what they expected would be an arguable case TO JUSTIFY THE "ARMED ROBBERY" as just part of their normal operations.    They created a RUSE for just that reasonHowever, the silly bitch lawyer Joanne Whiting, did not know what she was doing, so clearly the Ruse was hatched by one of her superiors.

That fact then begs the question of the purpose of that
RUSE and armed robbery, and exposes the perpetrators of the defrauding of the disabled old man of his home.  Because the Queensland Government perpetrated the fraud of the disabled old man of his home, his house and land, the Queensland government wants it concealed.  Therefore, the conduct of prosecuting the disabled old man is criminal and makes the perpetrated an accessory to the fraud.  The evidence giving those prosecuting the disabled old man a "guilty mind" is all that evidence on that webpage.  Those involved now in "prosecuting" the disabled old man  are criminal. 

While the corrupt parasite Shane Hunter, a prosecutor from the Commonwealth DPP, had the knowledge that the corrupt police Rantala and Antony did commit an armed robbery, he cannot be prosecuted as he has "advocates' immunity".  However, none of the others involved in the process of prosecuting the Disabled Old Man have immunity.  Corrupt ex-cop [now 'working' for KPMG] Brendan Scott Read had put another "prosecutor" from the CDPP right into the frame, by admitting they colluded to bring the false charges against the disabled old man, but that prosecutor was not an advocate in this matter, so does not have
advocates' immunity.  That other parasite from the CDPP is named Anthony Gett.  Corrupt ex-cop Brendan Scott Read also does not have immunity from prosecution for being an accessory to the Armed Robbery and to the defrauding the disabled old man of his house and land, worth in the order of $1million.  Of course, we will be assisting the disabled old man to gain many more similar house and land properties in the area from the Fraudsters.  This will include the house of the defrauding lawyer who did the transfer of the title with full knowledge of the fraud.  His name is Stephen Tonge.  The Queensland Government, both the Queensland Public Sector university, The University of Queensland, and the Queensland Government of Anna Bligh proper,  will be up for the majority of the damages.  This all arose because the disabled old man IS disabled.  It was thought by the public sector parasites, with UQ Registrar Douglas Porter, as the lead criminal in the box seat driving the fraud of the disabled old man, that the disabled old man was ripe for exploitation, because he is permanently disabled.  Now, the Commonwealth of Australia, in the person of the corrupt Commonwealth DPP prosecutor Shane R. Hunter, has joined the fray exploiting the disabled old man.  This in in stark contravention of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The parasitic Federal labor government acceded to the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities  on 21st August, 2009.

Because all the police involved in the prosecution of the disabled old man, are presumed to know the detail of the evidence proving the armed robbery because the evidence and legal reason is in the Public Domain, online and it would be reasonable to presume that police would check its validity, and we know the evidence is 100% genuine, then all the police including the police solicitor Paxton Booth are put in the frame by the evidence of Brendan Scott Read.  The other police aware of the criminal conduct in which they were engaged included  Detective Sergeant Steven Bignall, Detective Senior Constables Gavin Hackett and Detective Senior Constable Dave Graham.  Each of these has been engaged in a criminal activity.  This amounts to 

Because parasitic fraudster Shane Hunter of the CDPP was prepared to prosecute these charges, when he knew the evidence proved that police Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony committed an Armed Robbery, suggests that he expected a win, meaning that he knew the Magistrates Court, and possibly the District Court are corrupt, like as displayed, maybe by Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and District Court Judge Leanne Clare.  that .d ..


This case now has a high profile International dimension.  Australia has ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD].  Importantly, the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia has, on 21st August, 2009 acceded to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [OP].  As shyster Shane Hunter is a Commonwealth Public Servant within the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, a Commonwealth Agency, a part of the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, he and it are subject to the OP.  As the disabled old man has already suffered extensive discrimination, and fraud, at the hands of Shyster Shane Hunter, breach of the CRPD has already occurred and hence, pursuant to the OP, formal complaint can be made to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Geneva, Switzerland, once all domestic Australian remedies have been exhausted, or effectively exhausted.

The summary for each day will be a Menu of the anchors [or markers/tags] placed in the Transcript of this day.  It will be effectively a Summary of the discussion between the Magistrate Paul M Kluck [the Klutz] and Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, [who knows the evidence that  proves the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala did in fact commit an armed robbery because no-one had authority to enter exclusively possessed land, on that occasion; they needed a court order but did not have one].  The disabled old man did not appear in the committal hearing coram Kluck, after 28th June, as he had become ill from the constant barrage of harassment and jibes aimed at his disabilities, and attacks upon his weaknesses caused by his disabilities, from the Magistrate Kluck the Klutz and from the Commonwealth Government lawyer fraudster Shane Hunter.  Of course, neither need worry as Magistrate Klutz has Judicial Immunity and shyster Shane Hunter who knows he is assisting a crime perpetrated by the Government against a disabled citizen, including EXPLOITATION of the DISABLED, to remain concealed, has Advocates' Immunity.  In Kluck's court, Due Process was abrogated, because the disabled old man had Special Needs that were not accommodated by Paul M Kluck. Hence, from that moment, Kluck's court became a nullity. Thus, from then, the disabled old man was denied Due Process.  Read on the transcript, how Magistrate Kluck ridiculed the disabled old man.

At the time of committing the Armed Robbery of the disabled old man, Henri Elias Rantala illegally arrested the disabled old man so as to keep him from his home while his home was ransacked and his yard was cleared of all of his possession to order of the Queensland Government, who wished to take control of his property in quick time, for The University of Queensland to use.  This was orchestrated by the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  Well, on 20th July, 2010, 22 days after the last day that the disabled old man tried to perform in the committal hearing, on 28th June, 2010, the Queensland Court of Appeal gave it decision regarding that illegal arrest on that day of the disabled old man by parasite cop Rantala.  In clear dicta the Court of Appeal raised the spectre of the gross criminality involved in the whole matter

This day's transcript is one continuous file/page.  These anchors when listed will be listed in sequence.
The three days when witnesses have actually given evidence have been similarly summarised with "anchors" [aka markers/tags], and each appears thus:
  1. Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  2. Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  3. Day 3: 28th June, 2010
This case has international consequences, as this action by the Commonwealth Prosecutor, given that the disabled old man has been thrown out of his home by a corrupt judicial system of the magistrates and District Courts, is a disgusting reflection upon the judicial principle of Due Process, for any country in the world. This will make Australia the laughing stock of the international justice community.  So much more so as all this has been done with the full knowledge of the Australian Attorney General, Robert McClelland.

considerevidence.php

Consider the evidence! Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay.  

includedCDDMenuAvengerRevengeRetribution.php http://HaigReport.com/aaaaMenu/Menus/includedMenuDefraudingMeMyHome.php

LinkToAspinallInMorganPanel This Profile Panel re the dumb parasitic anglican priest John Leslie Morgan, links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud by archbishop Phillip Aspinall of a vulnerable disabled guy where anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall headed up the scheme to steal the home of this vulnerable disabled guy.

http://HaigReport.com/Photos/100_0663_20070120CanonRevProfDrJohnLeslieMorganWardenStJohnsCollegeUniversityQueenslandHidingBehindToiletRolls_cr30pc.jpg
About this despicable life form , Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, now Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.

This photo was taken in a supermarket, on the 20th January, 2007 at 4:54PM Brisbane, Australia time, when Morgan was attemting to not be photographed by hiding behind some toilet rolls.

This individual is evil and he escapes scrutiny as he is a "priest".  Over time I have collected much evidence about his evil and criminal actions and published it.  I have assembled that into a menu.  I now include that menu here.
/PHPincludesCorruptBrisbaneDiocese/includedMenuJohnMorgan.php Menu: CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan, @ St Johns College, UQ:
*  PROOF of the 2001 FRAUD  by CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Morgan
*  Directory of links about Criminal parasite priest Rev Canon John Leslie Morgan:
*  Directory of Anglican CORRUPTION matters:
*  Anglicans conspire to steal the home of disabled with aid of political & judicial corruption
*  PROOF of another instance that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is yet again a LIAR
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is Incompetent
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is a BULLY
*  Email from Morgan showing he is a silly malicious ratbag 
*  Is this Primate Aspinall's BUSINESS ACUMEN?
*  Anglican priest bullies DISABLED Neighbour to STEAL his HOME.
*  Yet another Morgan LIE that neither he nor St John's College had any documents about me..  I had to push it all the way to the Privacy Commission, who Morgan was repeatedly ignoring.  He really thinks he is god.
*  Anglican CORRUPTION EXPOSED
*  Another Morgan LIE
*  One of the many examples of MONEY & FRAUD being motivator of 'Rev' John Morgan
*  $1Mill+ FRAUD- St Johns College & University of Queensland
*  Australian CRIMINAL LAW Journal ISSN: 1321-6562 26 February, 2007. Issue #: 200702
*  FRAUD on Uni Students: $1,500 RENT PER WEEK, for an ASBESTOS RIDDEN dump.
*  Is FRAUD the answer for Anglican return on investment?

We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland. 

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php aaaaLinks/LinkToRantalaGateIndexPage.php

If you wish to view and USE the Full    Rantala-Gate:   Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia  cascading drop down menu [CDDM], click to GoTo the   Rantala-Gate:    website.



New Document Text of Transcript

Corrupt Police Rantala, Brisbane Magistrates Court, 'Mention', 15th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS


includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php includedMenuMagistratesCourtsCorruptPoliceRantalaTranscripts.php

Menu: Truncated Committal Hearing re Corrupt Police Henri Elias Rantala,

Brisbane Magistrates Court, 24th, 25th & 28th June, 2010 coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

Transcripts of Hearing days on which witnesses gave evidence, with Summaries as Menus of Anchors/Markers:

  1. Summary of this Case of Fraud by Queensland Police &Commonwealth DPP
  2. Index:
  3. *Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  4. *Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  5. *Day 3: 28th June, 2010

Transcripts of related Mentions, after the truncation of the committal; ['*' preceding links below means that that transcript is preceded by  a 'Summary' which is a Menu of Anchors/Markers:]

  1. Day 00:   9th June, 2010
  2. *Day 04: 29th June, 2010
  3. *Day 05: 30th June, 2010
  4. *Day 06:     1st July, 2010
  5. *Day 07:    9th July, 2010
  6. *Day 08: 10th August, 2010
  7. *Day 09:    1st September, 2010
  8. *Day 10:   8th September, 2010
  9.  * Day 11: 15th September, 2010
  10. Day 12: 22th September, 2010
  11. Day 13: 24th September, 2010

Transcripts for Pre-Trial Mentions, coram various magistrates:

  1. Day A: 14th September, 2009
  2. Day B: 2nd November, 2009
  3. Day C: 25th January, 2010
  4. Day D: 15th March, 2010.

MenuAnchorsDayXX

Summary of this Transcript  [which appears below] of Brisbane Magistrates Court, MENTION on 15th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck.

Firstly, we refer you to discussion of this day's transcript elsewhere on this website:

  1. AvengerRevengeRetributionTruth/MagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind20100915Hearing15thSeptember2010.php#MenuMagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind
  2. AvengerRevengeRetributionTruth/MagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind20100915Hearing15thSeptember2010.php#MagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind

& in particular:

  1. #Kluck Klutz Muddled Thinking
  2. #Kluck Admits He Denied Me A_Fair Hearing For Three Days
  3. #Mathews Allowed Extra Breaks
  4. #Allowed Assistance Dogs In Court
  5. #So Provided Special Measures ??????
  6. #Confused Logic Geometry Kluck Hunter: Lines vs Circles

Now, for the Anchors/markers in the transcript below:

  1. #MagistrateKluckAndShysterShaneRecognizeCommuniqueFromMe
  2. #KluckAttemptsToPrecisWhatI_HaveSaid
  3. #ItsGrossDisabilityDiscriminationOfCourtAndProsecutionoToDenyDisabledManReasonableAccommodationOfSpecialNeeds
  4. #Shyster Shane Hunter  RecognizesEffect Of My Brain Damage Disability
  5. #Shyster Shane Hunter Desperate Fraud & Desires Denial of my Special Needs As Dr Moyle stated 'Preferable' which Is Not 'Imperative'
  6. #ShysterShaneHunterAssertsNoReliefForDisabledPersonsUntilRigorousMedicalProofOfDisability
  7. #MagistrateKluckNOW_RecognizesI_HaveSpecialNeeds
  8. #MagistrateKluckRecognizesThereIsPrimaFacieEvidenceBeforeTheCourtThatI_HaveBrainInjury
  9. #Magistrate Kluck Admits He Knows I_Have Cross Examined Under Difficulty For Three Days
  10. #MagistrateKluckMakes False Assumption
  11. #This Is The Reason A_Formal Voir Dire Procedure Needs To Be Established
  12. #Shyster Shane Hunter Admits I_State I_Need My Special Needs Specially Accommodated



PHPincludes/includedWrittenByRussellMathews.php
Web-site, Written, Coded, Produced and Directed by
Russell G H Mathews
BCom BSc LLB BA

International Disability Rights Advocate
invoking
UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
& UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Image
CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE

View list of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards
Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html

RussellMathewsEmailSignatureDRA

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
International Disability Rights Advocate
invoking
UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
& UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
See my RESOUNDING VICTORY 20th July, 2010 in
Qld Court of Appeal

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of
      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND
Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]

http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

includedCDDMenuAvengerRevengeRetribution.php http://HaigReport.com/aaaaMenu/Menus/includedMenuDefraudingMeMyHome.php

LinkToAspinallInMorganPanel This Profile Panel re the dumb parasitic anglican priest John Leslie Morgan, links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud by archbishop Phillip Aspinall of a vulnerable disabled guy where anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall headed up the scheme to steal the home of this vulnerable disabled guy.

http://HaigReport.com/Photos/100_0663_20070120CanonRevProfDrJohnLeslieMorganWardenStJohnsCollegeUniversityQueenslandHidingBehindToiletRolls_cr30pc.jpg
About this despicable life form , Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, now Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.

This photo was taken in a supermarket, on the 20th January, 2007 at 4:54PM Brisbane, Australia time, when Morgan was attemting to not be photographed by hiding behind some toilet rolls.

This individual is evil and he escapes scrutiny as he is a "priest".  Over time I have collected much evidence about his evil and criminal actions and published it.  I have assembled that into a menu.  I now include that menu here.
/PHPincludesCorruptBrisbaneDiocese/includedMenuJohnMorgan.php Menu: CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan, @ St Johns College, UQ:
*  PROOF of the 2001 FRAUD  by CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Morgan
*  Directory of links about Criminal parasite priest Rev Canon John Leslie Morgan:
*  Directory of Anglican CORRUPTION matters:
*  Anglicans conspire to steal the home of disabled with aid of political & judicial corruption
*  PROOF of another instance that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is yet again a LIAR
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is Incompetent
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is a BULLY
*  Email from Morgan showing he is a silly malicious ratbag 
*  Is this Primate Aspinall's BUSINESS ACUMEN?
*  Anglican priest bullies DISABLED Neighbour to STEAL his HOME.
*  Yet another Morgan LIE that neither he nor St John's College had any documents about me..  I had to push it all the way to the Privacy Commission, who Morgan was repeatedly ignoring.  He really thinks he is god.
*  Anglican CORRUPTION EXPOSED
*  Another Morgan LIE
*  One of the many examples of MONEY & FRAUD being motivator of 'Rev' John Morgan
*  $1Mill+ FRAUD- St Johns College & University of Queensland
*  Australian CRIMINAL LAW Journal ISSN: 1321-6562 26 February, 2007. Issue #: 200702
*  FRAUD on Uni Students: $1,500 RENT PER WEEK, for an ASBESTOS RIDDEN dump.
*  Is FRAUD the answer for Anglican return on investment?

We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland. 

Fraud by Douglas Porter, The University of Queensland, [part of the Australian Government], by defrauding a disabled reclusive old man of his HOUSE & LAND; including Douglas Porter's being linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity

These pages will be developed to expose the defrauding of a disabled, and hence reclusive old man of his house and land at 254 Hawken Drive St Lucia [view MAP] by Douglas Porter, the previous Registrar of The University of Queensland, for use by The University of Queensland.  Douglas Porter had been attacking, bullying and discriminating against this disabled reclusive old man since the early 1990s when he was a mature age student at The University of Queensland.

Porter was closely associated with two others linked to the Attempted MURDER of the disabled old man, being the then recent law lecturers Quentin Bryce, and Patsy Mary Wolfe.  The disabled old man was, at that time, a student of law at the University of Queensland, where Porter was Registrar.  Porter was engaged in bullying 
the disabled old man prior to the Attempted Murder of the disabled old man, and subsequenly, but then with greater  gusto.   Douglas Porter, then, as clandstine Chair of the St Johns College Council, that ran the St Johns College on the St Lucia, Brisbane Campus of The University of Queensland, began to secretly orchestrate the theft of the home of the disabled old man; the house and land owned in trust by the disabled old man, to take advantage of the fact that the disabled old man was under a strident attack..  

LinkToAspinallInPorterPanel.php This Profile Panel re the parasitic Douglas Porter, rewarded by the anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall and the anglican church, because Porter used confidential information obtained as Registrar of The University of Queensland, to assist Phillip Aspinall steal the home of a vulnerable disabled guy links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud of this vulnerable disabled guy by anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall.

  Douglas PORTER is linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity.
See fat pig parasite Porter playing with himself

  masturbating

in his office. So, what can you expect from The University of Queensland?
Write and tell us what you think about this University.
  Douglas Porter taken at 9:55AM 12th July, 2006 in his office at The University of Queensland where he was at that time, Registrar of The University of Queensland, and also clandestinely, the Representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly Chairman of, the St Johns College Council which runs St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland.  For years prior and years since then, Porter was secretly scheming to steal my home, beneficially owned by me, from me, by threatening and manipulating the emotionally challenged emotional shell of the trustee.

Concurrently, while I was then a student at the Universiity of Queensland, Douglas Porter, as Registrar, repeatedly discriminated against me in relation to my use of the libraries and my being accompanied by my two wee assistance dogs while on the campus of UQ.

Just days before the armed robbery on me on 29th November, 2004, by corrupt cop [and Armed Robber] at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, as a preliminary and integral step towards stealing my property [my home, my beneficially owned house and land], from me, all orchestrated by Douglas Porter, Douglas Porter had that same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala charge me with bogus criminal charges. No doubt this was intended to complicate my life even more than my life was being complicated, on top of my disabilities, by all the Douglas Porter inspired disability discrimination of me in UQ libraries, so making the theft of my home even easier for The University of Queensland.


We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this intellectual lightweight and corrupt gutless parasite .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 .   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 . 

Douglas Porter was The University of Queensland's SECRETIVE/CLANDESTINE representative, [and Chair], on the Governing body of one college, St Johns College at the University of Queensland - [see 7th paragraph of this linked UQ publication] or our copy.   [Of course, The University of Queensland has complete control of that land on which the college is built, with its complicated legal arrangement.]  The Governing body is called the the St Johns College Council [SJCC] and Douglas Porter is the Chair of the SJCC. Important in the workings of St Johns College and the St Johns College Council, is the SJCC Budget.  The Warden of St Johns College is the fraudster the Rev John Morgan.  He is answerable to the SJCC for the running of SJC.  In particular, he is petrified of his spending being in excess of the SJCC budget.  He even attempts to defraud to avoid spending money that is not in the SJCC budget.  Earlier that year, Morgan admitted lying to me the previous year, so that he would not have to face up to the St Johns College Council [SJCC], for having spent money that he was legally required to spend, that was, however, not in the SJCC budget.  

Hence, SJCC is a part of the Australian Government Sector, as is The University of Queensland.  Also involved in this fraud were other divisions of the Australian Public Sector, namely the Brisbane City Council, Queensland Police [including the most senior level, on the evidence of the Queensland Police], Queensland Courts especially Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and Supreme Court Judge Henry George Fryberg. Others were involved for the money they would make from it and to be "on the in" with corrupt public sector parasites.  These include lawyer Stephen Tonge, [view home of Tonge on MAP]  then a partner of Firm of lawyers Flower & Hart but more recently of Tress Cox.  Some Capital Funding was provided by the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church aka the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Paul de Jersey, is the Chancellor of the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC].  They provided the funding for an expected return [albeit fraudulent] of approximately 20% year on year plus a locked in Capital Gain well in excess of CPI indexation.

Because the Australian Government has been involved in defrauding this disabled reclusive old man, this matter, and his being defrauded of his Commonwealth Disability Support Pension by Centrelink, will end up coram/before UN committees in Geneva pursuant to Australia's acceding to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.   The Corrupt Australian Government and all parts of it involved in this widespread fraud should be greatly shamed and we will expose them.

The Queensland Court of Appeal, the highest court in Queensland, has recently spoken on this matter.  [It was written up in the Brisbane newspaper as "Talk of the Legal World".], However, there is far more to come.

Link to Public Sector Parasites VERSUS the Internet:

On a related topic, have a look at Public Sector Parasites Versus The Internet:
It's coming: Watch this space, but in the interim have a look at:

http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

http://HaigReport.com/aaaaMenu/Menus/includedMenuDefraudingMeMyHome.php

LinkToAspinallInMorganPanel This Profile Panel re the dumb parasitic anglican priest John Leslie Morgan, links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud by archbishop Phillip Aspinall of a vulnerable disabled guy where anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall headed up the scheme to steal the home of this vulnerable disabled guy.

http://HaigReport.com/Photos/100_0663_20070120CanonRevProfDrJohnLeslieMorganWardenStJohnsCollegeUniversityQueenslandHidingBehindToiletRolls_cr30pc.jpg
About this despicable life form , Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, now Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.

This photo was taken in a supermarket, on the 20th January, 2007 at 4:54PM Brisbane, Australia time, when Morgan was attemting to not be photographed by hiding behind some toilet rolls.

This individual is evil and he escapes scrutiny as he is a "priest".  Over time I have collected much evidence about his evil and criminal actions and published it.  I have assembled that into a menu.  I now include that menu here.
/PHPincludesCorruptBrisbaneDiocese/includedMenuJohnMorgan.php Menu: CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan, @ St Johns College, UQ:
*  PROOF of the 2001 FRAUD  by CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Morgan
*  Directory of links about Criminal parasite priest Rev Canon John Leslie Morgan:
*  Directory of Anglican CORRUPTION matters:
*  Anglicans conspire to steal the home of disabled with aid of political & judicial corruption
*  PROOF of another instance that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is yet again a LIAR
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is Incompetent
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is a BULLY
*  Email from Morgan showing he is a silly malicious ratbag 
*  Is this Primate Aspinall's BUSINESS ACUMEN?
*  Anglican priest bullies DISABLED Neighbour to STEAL his HOME.
*  Yet another Morgan LIE that neither he nor St John's College had any documents about me..  I had to push it all the way to the Privacy Commission, who Morgan was repeatedly ignoring.  He really thinks he is god.
*  Anglican CORRUPTION EXPOSED
*  Another Morgan LIE
*  One of the many examples of MONEY & FRAUD being motivator of 'Rev' John Morgan
*  $1Mill+ FRAUD- St Johns College & University of Queensland
*  Australian CRIMINAL LAW Journal ISSN: 1321-6562 26 February, 2007. Issue #: 200702
*  FRAUD on Uni Students: $1,500 RENT PER WEEK, for an ASBESTOS RIDDEN dump.
*  Is FRAUD the answer for Anglican return on investment?

We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland. 

Text of Transcript

Corrupt Police Rantala, Brisbane Magistrates Court, 'Mention', 15th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS


includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php includedMenuMagistratesCourtsCorruptPoliceRantalaTranscripts.php

Menu: Truncated Committal Hearing re Corrupt Police Henri Elias Rantala,

Brisbane Magistrates Court, 24th, 25th & 28th June, 2010 coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

Transcripts of Hearing days on which witnesses gave evidence, with Summaries as Menus of Anchors/Markers:

  1. Summary of this Case of Fraud by Queensland Police &Commonwealth DPP
  2. Index:
  3. *Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  4. *Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  5. *Day 3: 28th June, 2010

Transcripts of related Mentions, after the truncation of the committal; ['*' preceding links below means that that transcript is preceded by  a 'Summary' which is a Menu of Anchors/Markers:]

  1. Day 00:   9th June, 2010
  2. *Day 04: 29th June, 2010
  3. *Day 05: 30th June, 2010
  4. *Day 06:     1st July, 2010
  5. *Day 07:    9th July, 2010
  6. *Day 08: 10th August, 2010
  7. *Day 09:    1st September, 2010
  8. *Day 10:   8th September, 2010
  9.  * Day 11: 15th September, 2010
  10. Day 12: 22th September, 2010
  11. Day 13: 24th September, 2010

Transcripts for Pre-Trial Mentions, coram various magistrates:

  1. Day A: 14th September, 2009
  2. Day B: 2nd November, 2009
  3. Day C: 25th January, 2010
  4. Day D: 15th March, 2010.

MenuAnchorsDayXX

Summary of this Transcript  [which appears below] of Brisbane Magistrates Court, MENTION on 15th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck.

Firstly, we refer you to discussion of this day's transcript elsewhere on this website:

  1. AvengerRevengeRetributionTruth/MagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind20100915Hearing15thSeptember2010.php#MenuMagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind
  2. AvengerRevengeRetributionTruth/MagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind20100915Hearing15thSeptember2010.php#MagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind

& in particular:

  1. #Kluck Klutz Muddled Thinking
  2. #Kluck Admits He Denied Me A_Fair Hearing For Three Days
  3. #Mathews Allowed Extra Breaks
  4. #Allowed Assistance Dogs In Court
  5. #So Provided Special Measures ??????
  6. #Confused Logic Geometry Kluck Hunter: Lines vs Circles

Now, for the Anchors/markers in the transcript below:

  1. #MagistrateKluckAndShysterShaneRecognizeCommuniqueFromMe
  2. #KluckAttemptsToPrecisWhatI_HaveSaid
  3. #ItsGrossDisabilityDiscriminationOfCourtAndProsecutionoToDenyDisabledManReasonableAccommodationOfSpecialNeeds
  4. #Shyster Shane Hunter  RecognizesEffect Of My Brain Damage Disability
  5. #Shyster Shane Hunter Desperate Fraud & Desires Denial of my Special Needs As Dr Moyle stated 'Preferable' which Is Not 'Imperative'
  6. #ShysterShaneHunterAssertsNoReliefForDisabledPersonsUntilRigorousMedicalProofOfDisability
  7. #MagistrateKluckNOW_RecognizesI_HaveSpecialNeeds
  8. #MagistrateKluckRecognizesThereIsPrimaFacieEvidenceBeforeTheCourtThatI_HaveBrainInjury
  9. #Magistrate Kluck Admits He Knows I_Have Cross Examined Under Difficulty For Three Days
  10. #MagistrateKluckMakes False Assumption
  11. #This Is The Reason A_Formal Voir Dire Procedure Needs To Be Established
  12. #Shyster Shane Hunter Admits I_State I_Need My Special Needs Specially Accommodated


includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php aaaaLinks/LinkToRantalaGateIndexPage.php

If you wish to view and USE the Full    Rantala-Gate:   Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia  cascading drop down menu [CDDM], click to GoTo the   Rantala-Gate:    website.



Fraud by Douglas Porter, The University of Queensland, [part of the Australian Government], by defrauding a disabled reclusive old man of his HOUSE & LAND; including Douglas Porter's being linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity

These pages will be developed to expose the defrauding of a disabled, and hence reclusive old man of his house and land at 254 Hawken Drive St Lucia [view MAP] by Douglas Porter, the previous Registrar of The University of Queensland, for use by The University of Queensland.  Douglas Porter had been attacking, bullying and discriminating against this disabled reclusive old man since the early 1990s when he was a mature age student at The University of Queensland.

Porter was closely associated with two others linked to the Attempted MURDER of the disabled old man, being the then recent law lecturers Quentin Bryce, and Patsy Mary Wolfe.  The disabled old man was, at that time, a student of law at the University of Queensland, where Porter was Registrar.  Porter was engaged in bullying 
the disabled old man prior to the Attempted Murder of the disabled old man, and subsequenly, but then with greater  gusto.   Douglas Porter, then, as clandstine Chair of the St Johns College Council, that ran the St Johns College on the St Lucia, Brisbane Campus of The University of Queensland, began to secretly orchestrate the theft of the home of the disabled old man; the house and land owned in trust by the disabled old man, to take advantage of the fact that the disabled old man was under a strident attack..  

LinkToAspinallInPorterPanel.php This Profile Panel re the parasitic Douglas Porter, rewarded by the anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall and the anglican church, because Porter used confidential information obtained as Registrar of The University of Queensland, to assist Phillip Aspinall steal the home of a vulnerable disabled guy links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud of this vulnerable disabled guy by anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall.

  Douglas PORTER is linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity.
See fat pig parasite Porter playing with himself

  masturbating

in his office. So, what can you expect from The University of Queensland?
Write and tell us what you think about this University.
  Douglas Porter taken at 9:55AM 12th July, 2006 in his office at The University of Queensland where he was at that time, Registrar of The University of Queensland, and also clandestinely, the Representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly Chairman of, the St Johns College Council which runs St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland.  For years prior and years since then, Porter was secretly scheming to steal my home, beneficially owned by me, from me, by threatening and manipulating the emotionally challenged emotional shell of the trustee.

Concurrently, while I was then a student at the Universiity of Queensland, Douglas Porter, as Registrar, repeatedly discriminated against me in relation to my use of the libraries and my being accompanied by my two wee assistance dogs while on the campus of UQ.

Just days before the armed robbery on me on 29th November, 2004, by corrupt cop [and Armed Robber] at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, as a preliminary and integral step towards stealing my property [my home, my beneficially owned house and land], from me, all orchestrated by Douglas Porter, Douglas Porter had that same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala charge me with bogus criminal charges. No doubt this was intended to complicate my life even more than my life was being complicated, on top of my disabilities, by all the Douglas Porter inspired disability discrimination of me in UQ libraries, so making the theft of my home even easier for The University of Queensland.


We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this intellectual lightweight and corrupt gutless parasite .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 .   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 . 

Douglas Porter was The University of Queensland's SECRETIVE/CLANDESTINE representative, [and Chair], on the Governing body of one college, St Johns College at the University of Queensland - [see 7th paragraph of this linked UQ publication] or our copy.   [Of course, The University of Queensland has complete control of that land on which the college is built, with its complicated legal arrangement.]  The Governing body is called the the St Johns College Council [SJCC] and Douglas Porter is the Chair of the SJCC. Important in the workings of St Johns College and the St Johns College Council, is the SJCC Budget.  The Warden of St Johns College is the fraudster the Rev John Morgan.  He is answerable to the SJCC for the running of SJC.  In particular, he is petrified of his spending being in excess of the SJCC budget.  He even attempts to defraud to avoid spending money that is not in the SJCC budget.  Earlier that year, Morgan admitted lying to me the previous year, so that he would not have to face up to the St Johns College Council [SJCC], for having spent money that he was legally required to spend, that was, however, not in the SJCC budget.  

Hence, SJCC is a part of the Australian Government Sector, as is The University of Queensland.  Also involved in this fraud were other divisions of the Australian Public Sector, namely the Brisbane City Council, Queensland Police [including the most senior level, on the evidence of the Queensland Police], Queensland Courts especially Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and Supreme Court Judge Henry George Fryberg. Others were involved for the money they would make from it and to be "on the in" with corrupt public sector parasites.  These include lawyer Stephen Tonge, [view home of Tonge on MAP]  then a partner of Firm of lawyers Flower & Hart but more recently of Tress Cox.  Some Capital Funding was provided by the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church aka the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Paul de Jersey, is the Chancellor of the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC].  They provided the funding for an expected return [albeit fraudulent] of approximately 20% year on year plus a locked in Capital Gain well in excess of CPI indexation.

Because the Australian Government has been involved in defrauding this disabled reclusive old man, this matter, and his being defrauded of his Commonwealth Disability Support Pension by Centrelink, will end up coram/before UN committees in Geneva pursuant to Australia's acceding to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.   The Corrupt Australian Government and all parts of it involved in this widespread fraud should be greatly shamed and we will expose them.

The Queensland Court of Appeal, the highest court in Queensland, has recently spoken on this matter.  [It was written up in the Brisbane newspaper as "Talk of the Legal World".], However, there is far more to come.

includedCDDMenuAvengerRevengeRetribution.php Text of Transcript

Corrupt Police Rantala, Brisbane Magistrates Court, 'Mention', 15th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS


includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php includedMenuMagistratesCourtsCorruptPoliceRantalaTranscripts.php

Menu: Truncated Committal Hearing re Corrupt Police Henri Elias Rantala,

Brisbane Magistrates Court, 24th, 25th & 28th June, 2010 coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

Transcripts of Hearing days on which witnesses gave evidence, with Summaries as Menus of Anchors/Markers:

  1. Summary of this Case of Fraud by Queensland Police &Commonwealth DPP
  2. Index:
  3. *Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  4. *Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  5. *Day 3: 28th June, 2010

Transcripts of related Mentions, after the truncation of the committal; ['*' preceding links below means that that transcript is preceded by  a 'Summary' which is a Menu of Anchors/Markers:]

  1. Day 00:   9th June, 2010
  2. *Day 04: 29th June, 2010
  3. *Day 05: 30th June, 2010
  4. *Day 06:     1st July, 2010
  5. *Day 07:    9th July, 2010
  6. *Day 08: 10th August, 2010
  7. *Day 09:    1st September, 2010
  8. *Day 10:   8th September, 2010
  9.  * Day 11: 15th September, 2010
  10. Day 12: 22th September, 2010
  11. Day 13: 24th September, 2010

Transcripts for Pre-Trial Mentions, coram various magistrates:

  1. Day A: 14th September, 2009
  2. Day B: 2nd November, 2009
  3. Day C: 25th January, 2010
  4. Day D: 15th March, 2010.

MenuAnchorsDayXX

Summary of this Transcript  [which appears below] of Brisbane Magistrates Court, MENTION on 15th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck.

Firstly, we refer you to discussion of this day's transcript elsewhere on this website:

  1. AvengerRevengeRetributionTruth/MagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind20100915Hearing15thSeptember2010.php#MenuMagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind
  2. AvengerRevengeRetributionTruth/MagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind20100915Hearing15thSeptember2010.php#MagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind

& in particular:

  1. #Kluck Klutz Muddled Thinking
  2. #Kluck Admits He Denied Me A_Fair Hearing For Three Days
  3. #Mathews Allowed Extra Breaks
  4. #Allowed Assistance Dogs In Court
  5. #So Provided Special Measures ??????
  6. #Confused Logic Geometry Kluck Hunter: Lines vs Circles

Now, for the Anchors/markers in the transcript below:

  1. #MagistrateKluckAndShysterShaneRecognizeCommuniqueFromMe
  2. #KluckAttemptsToPrecisWhatI_HaveSaid
  3. #ItsGrossDisabilityDiscriminationOfCourtAndProsecutionoToDenyDisabledManReasonableAccommodationOfSpecialNeeds
  4. #Shyster Shane Hunter  RecognizesEffect Of My Brain Damage Disability
  5. #Shyster Shane Hunter Desperate Fraud & Desires Denial of my Special Needs As Dr Moyle stated 'Preferable' which Is Not 'Imperative'
  6. #ShysterShaneHunterAssertsNoReliefForDisabledPersonsUntilRigorousMedicalProofOfDisability
  7. #MagistrateKluckNOW_RecognizesI_HaveSpecialNeeds
  8. #MagistrateKluckRecognizesThereIsPrimaFacieEvidenceBeforeTheCourtThatI_HaveBrainInjury
  9. #Magistrate Kluck Admits He Knows I_Have Cross Examined Under Difficulty For Three Days
  10. #MagistrateKluckMakes False Assumption
  11. #This Is The Reason A_Formal Voir Dire Procedure Needs To Be Established
  12. #Shyster Shane Hunter Admits I_State I_Need My Special Needs Specially Accommodated


includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php includedMenuMagistratesCourtsCorruptPoliceRantalaTranscripts.php

Menu: Truncated Committal Hearing re Corrupt Police Henri Elias Rantala,

Brisbane Magistrates Court, 24th, 25th & 28th June, 2010 coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

Transcripts of Hearing days on which witnesses gave evidence, with Summaries as Menus of Anchors/Markers:

  1. Summary of this Case of Fraud by Queensland Police &Commonwealth DPP
  2. Index:
  3. *Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  4. *Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  5. *Day 3: 28th June, 2010

Transcripts of related Mentions, after the truncation of the committal; ['*' preceding links below means that that transcript is preceded by  a 'Summary' which is a Menu of Anchors/Markers:]

  1. Day 00:   9th June, 2010
  2. *Day 04: 29th June, 2010
  3. *Day 05: 30th June, 2010
  4. *Day 06:     1st July, 2010
  5. *Day 07:    9th July, 2010
  6. *Day 08: 10th August, 2010
  7. *Day 09:    1st September, 2010
  8. *Day 10:   8th September, 2010
  9.  * Day 11: 15th September, 2010
  10. Day 12: 22th September, 2010
  11. Day 13: 24th September, 2010

Transcripts for Pre-Trial Mentions, coram various magistrates:

  1. Day A: 14th September, 2009
  2. Day B: 2nd November, 2009
  3. Day C: 25th January, 2010
  4. Day D: 15th March, 2010.

MenuAnchorsDayXX

Summary of this Transcript  [which appears below] of Brisbane Magistrates Court, MENTION on 15th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck.

Firstly, we refer you to discussion of this day's transcript elsewhere on this website:

  1. AvengerRevengeRetributionTruth/MagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind20100915Hearing15thSeptember2010.php#MenuMagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind
  2. AvengerRevengeRetributionTruth/MagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind20100915Hearing15thSeptember2010.php#MagistratePaulMKluckKlutzMuddledMind

& in particular:

  1. #Kluck Klutz Muddled Thinking
  2. #Kluck Admits He Denied Me A_Fair Hearing For Three Days
  3. #Mathews Allowed Extra Breaks
  4. #Allowed Assistance Dogs In Court
  5. #So Provided Special Measures ??????
  6. #Confused Logic Geometry Kluck Hunter: Lines vs Circles

Now, for the Anchors/markers in the transcript below:

  1. #MagistrateKluckAndShysterShaneRecognizeCommuniqueFromMe
  2. #KluckAttemptsToPrecisWhatI_HaveSaid
  3. #ItsGrossDisabilityDiscriminationOfCourtAndProsecutionoToDenyDisabledManReasonableAccommodationOfSpecialNeeds
  4. #Shyster Shane Hunter  RecognizesEffect Of My Brain Damage Disability
  5. #Shyster Shane Hunter Desperate Fraud & Desires Denial of my Special Needs As Dr Moyle stated 'Preferable' which Is Not 'Imperative'
  6. #ShysterShaneHunterAssertsNoReliefForDisabledPersonsUntilRigorousMedicalProofOfDisability
  7. #MagistrateKluckNOW_RecognizesI_HaveSpecialNeeds
  8. #MagistrateKluckRecognizesThereIsPrimaFacieEvidenceBeforeTheCourtThatI_HaveBrainInjury
  9. #Magistrate Kluck Admits He Knows I_Have Cross Examined Under Difficulty For Three Days
  10. #MagistrateKluckMakes False Assumption
  11. #This Is The Reason A_Formal Voir Dire Procedure Needs To Be Established
  12. #Shyster Shane Hunter Admits I_State I_Need My Special Needs Specially Accommodated


http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

Text of Transcript

Corrupt Police Rantala, Brisbane Magistrates Court, 'Mention', 15th September, 2010 Coram Magistrate Paul M Kluck:

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS


MAGISTRATES COURT


KLUCK, Magistrate


MAG-00171907/09(8)


THE CROWN

Complainant


and



RUSSELL GORDON HAIG MATHEWS

Defendant


BRISBANE


..DATE 15/09/2010


CONTINUED FROM 08/09/2010


..DAY 12


THE COURT RESUMED


CLARE JARVIS APPOINTED AS RECORDER


BENCH: Yes, I take the continuation of committal proceedings involving the defendant Russell Gordon Haig Mathews. Good morning, Mr Hunter.


MR HUNTER: For the record, your Honour     


BENCH: Mr Hunter, for the record appears for the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions.


MR HUNTER: Yes, your Honour, Hunter, initials S R.


BENCH: And there is e-mail correspondence from the defendant?


MR HUNTER: There is, your Honour.


BENCH: And essentially - the matter was last mentioned on the 8th of September.


MR HUNTER: Mmm-hmm.


BENCH: And the defendant was invited to respond to the issue of his fitness to be tried pursuant to section 20B of the Crimes Act 1914 Commonwealth. He's done so, essentially. He's saying that he is fit and that it's a gross disability discrimination of Court and the prosecution to deny a disabled man special measures, also known as reasonable accommodations which are his right and instead attempt to characterise his disability as being not fit for trial.


That, Mr Hunter     


MR HUNTER: That's as I understand the last response from him, yes.


BENCH: But what's your view?


MR HUNTER: Your Honour, the section     


BENCH: Bearing in mind that it's not a matter for me to determine his fitness for trial.


MR HUNTER: Correct. But the preliminary issue is whether or not there is a question as to his fitness to plead. Section 20B is cast in the imperative terms as your Honour's pointed out but states that the question of the person's fitness to be tried in respect of the offence is raised by the prosecution, defence or legal representative.


So, the issue that your Honour has to decide is whether or not there is a question raised with respect to his fitness to be tried. Now, the cases in this area refer to, or they at least speak in terms of, a real or real and substantial question. Now, your Honour will be familiar with the case of Pressor from Victoria in 1958.


BENCH: Mmm.


MR HUNTER: And there are six indicia, five of which, in my submission, there is no suggestion that he's incapable of one, for example, understanding what he's charged with; there's no question raised about that; two, plead to the charge and exercise a right of challenge. There's no question that's be raised as to his ability there. Similarly, understand generally the nature of the proceedings; there is no question that he is unable to understand.


Similarly, able to follow the course of proceedings; that's the fourth one; and fifth one, able to understand the substantial effect of the evidence against him. There is no question, given that he's already cross-examined for three days and has created miles of e-mail traffic with respect to his notions of the relevance of the events back in 2005.


The only matter which may have some attraction to your Honour is the sixth one and that was to be able to make his defence and answer the charge.


In my submission, however, it's no so much what Mr Mathews says but rather that which the medical reports indicate is the basis from which your Honour would be guided and to that extent, there are three medical reports which he has referred to in his e-mails which your Honour may well have, but I'll just recite them. There's one from a Dr Rob Moyle dated 6 August 2010.

In that report, Dr Moyle states that he has treated Mr Mathews over a number of years but says, "It is preferable if Russell is able to have access to a keyboard and a computer that will allow him to communicate in writing such that he has sufficient time to consider and reasonably report his points to the Court". Preferable, not imperative, not that he is frozen by the anxiety but that it is preferable.


In a report from the same Dr Moyle, again referred to in the e-mails from Mr Mathews in April 2007, he says in the last paragraph, "It would help Russell learn to trust others if any department dealing with Russell appointed individual case managers advising him of best methods to achieve the task in hand such as rigid timetables to achieve any task worked out in consultation with Russell".


And finally in a report of a Dr Hazel in October of 2005, says in paragraph 3, referring to Mr Mathews, "He could be described as suffering from a schizo-typal personality disorder consequent of his head injuries. Nevertheless, it does not impair his ability to conduct his own affairs".


So, those three medical reports do not, in any way, suggest that he is unable to make his defence. Quite the contrary, the e-mail traffic shows a deep understanding of the underlying facts in this case.


The case which I would seek to refer your Honour to is a recent Court of Appeal decision called Agahwah; it's reported at [2009] QCA 307.


BENCH: Thank you.


MR HUNTER: In particular that paragraph 100, I should say that Agahwah is very helpful in that it refers to a number of cases that the High Court has considered on this issue and others relating to section 20B and it also refers to the case of Teir in which Justice Kirby, as he then as, refers to general guidance on the question whether an issue as to fitness to be tried can be seen to have arisen at paragraph 100 and the quotation that Justice Kirby makes then is to another High Court case called Ngatayi, N-G-A-T-A-Y-I, Ngatayi, 147 CLR and it's the indented paragraph from page 9 of that report.


And it say, "Once a real question as to incapacity is raised, the Judge must follow the procedure" and as we've accepted that is correct in this case, "If counsel raises an issue of incapacity should indicate the nature of the facts, he should indicate the nature of the facts which in his submission will support the view that the accused is incapable of understanding the proceedings so as to be able to make a proper defence. The Judge should then leave the issue to the jury and then 'unless on the facts as stated no reasonable jury properly instructed could find that the accused was not capable of understanding the proceedings so as to be able to make a proper defence'".


Now, the procedure in Queensland, consequent upon the invocation of section 20B is 613 of the Queensland Criminal Code; the case of Kesa, K-E-S-A, V-A-R-A-J-A-H which is a High Court case reported at 181 CLR 230, clearly makes it the law that the State procedure is the one which is followed subsequent to a section 20B referral.


It speaks in terms of a want of understanding. In my submission, there is no question, no real question and no real or substantial question that Mr Mathews is incapable of understanding the nature of his proceedings and he is unable to make his defence. The highest the medical evidence places it is that he has difficulty in communicating his thoughts from time to time.


Now, there is another case which I would seek to rely on in this regard, your Honour, and it is a case in the Court of Appeal [2002] QCA 464, it's called simply the Crown against M.


BENCH: Yes.


MR HUNTER: Admittedly, in that case, Mr M was represented. However, the principles enunciated are clear and in my submission, equally apposite in this case.


At paragraph six, there is a quotation there and again, this is in the judgment of Chief Justice de Jersey, paragraph six, the bottom half of that quotation referring to the tests of what amounts to a fair trial but the Court said this and this is again citing the High Court in Ngatayi, "We respectfully agree with the view expressed by Smith J in Pressor, that the test needs to be applied in a reasonable and commonsense fashion".


Smith J went on to say that, "There are certain minimum standards which the accused needs to equal before he can be tried without unfairness or injustice", but added that "the accused need not have the mental capacity to make an able defence".


Now, Mr M was in the lowest one percentile of intellect in the community. At paragraphs 13 and following of the judgement, Chief Justice de Jersey goes on; he says, "Fitness for trial in relation to the capacity to instruct counsel", although in this particular case Mr Mathews isn't represented. However, the principles are equally apposite, in my submission - says, "It posits a reasonable grasp of the evidence given, capacity to indicate a response, ability to apprise counsel of the accused's own position and a capacity to under counsel's advice and make decisions in relation to the course of the proceedings".


Paragraph 14, his Honour said, "The public interest warrants the trial of persons accused of criminal offences, whether their level of intellectual capacity be normal or otherwise. In this case the appellant's intellectual capacity means that the process of trial will probably be longer and somewhat disjointed but obviously that feature would not warrant disbanding the proceeding. This appellant has the basic relevant understanding. The Court will bear with him to ensure his trial is fair.


To [indistinct] a person like this appellant a trial would, having regard to both his interests in responding to the charge and possibly having his name cleared on the interest of the community and ensuring that criminal charges are properly pursued would be frankly inconsistent with the rule of law".


In my submission, Mr Mathews doesnít even come close to the situation Mr M found himself in and yet he was considered fit to be tried. So, the question which is raised - well, in my submission, there is no question raised in the sense that your Honour could conclude that a jury properly instructed could find him unfit.


BENCH: Mmm. But in all of those cases, there was no issue with each of those persons being able to be physically present in the courtroom.


MR HUNTER: Well, that's right. Nowhere in     


BENCH: That's the problem this Court has and potentially the District Court may have, if the evidence is sufficient to put     


MR HUNTER: Correct. But     


BENCH:      Mr Mathews on his trial.


MR HUNTER:      there is no medical evidence before this Court that he is incapable of attending Court.


BENCH: But he's raising the issue. Even Dr Moyle is raising the issue, isn't he; how he needs a computer et cetera?


MR HUNTER: That doesnít make him unfit to be tried.


BENCH: But that's the issue.


MR HUNTER: I'm sorry, your Honour?


BENCH: Isn't that the issue?


MR HUNTER: That's doesnít raise the question     


BENCH: I mean, it's not the normal issue - it's not the normal fitness to be tried question, it seems. But I'm just concerned - I mean, we're talking about a person charged with indictable offences.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: He's not legally represented; he says he doesnít trust lawyers.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: So, I can take from that that at least in committal proceedings he won't be represented. He has no one to sit with him to perform the function of a McKenzie friend; that was raised and from my memory he said he didnít have anyone or - I can't remember the exact answer he gave to that.


MR HUNTER: Yes. Yes, he did respond in that way.


BENCH: Now, there's prima facie evidence or information before the Court that he has a brain injury.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: It seems that he can't cross-examine witnesses because of that brain injury in what I would consider to be the normal manner of cross-examination. He has done that under difficulty for three days.


MR HUNTER: Yes. At times quite fluently.


BENCH: Yes. But that is the nature of the issue of fitness for trial; it's a fluid concept, isn't it? But as I understand it, he's asking the Court to allow him to proceed in what I would think would be an unworkable and unmanageable way for an adversarial environment     


MR HUNTER: Yes. Well     


BENCH:      that a committal proceeding is to be able to cross-examine witnesses. And importantly, I think, even if I were to consider what he's proposing, what I think he's proposing to cross-examine by e-mail, I think there's a real risk that I wouldnít be allowing him to do justice to himself. In other words, he wouldnít get a fair committal.


MR HUNTER: So     


BENCH: And now, if that situation were to continue at his trial, if the evidence is sufficient, I think there's a real question of fitness to be tried.


MR HUNTER: Not within the     


BENCH: And that's a matter for the District Court.


MR HUNTER: With respect, your Honour, I disagree.


BENCH: Well, fitness encompasses his brain injury.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: Which leads to his apparent inability to cross-examine witnesses in the normal manner because under the pressure of the situation his mind goes blank; he needs to go away, he says, and think about things; do something else, come back and he wants to cross-examine, I think this is what he's saying, by e-mail shuttle and that would be unworkable.


MR HUNTER: I'm not sure that he's ever actually said how he proposes to cross-examine these witnesses. He simply says he needs his special needs specially accommodated and he intends to cross-examine but hasnít said exactly how that would be executed, so to speak.


BENCH: No. He wants special measures put in place to talk about his special measures; we go around in circles.


MR HUNTER: Yes, exactly. We go around in circles. Now, your Honour, section 104 of the Justice Act requires committal proceedings to be held in the presence and hearing of the defendant.


BENCH: That's right.


MR HUNTER: He says, although the medical evidence doesnít necessarily support it, that he can't come to Court. So, the defendant can't, of his own volition dictate how the proceedings are to be conducted. If your Honour has a look at section - paragraph 189 in Agahwah and I should say, Agahwah was - behaved disgracefully in Court and was excluded from her trial. Section     


BENCH: Are we talking about a trial there.


MR HUNTER: It was a trial but this is the principle that was enunciated and the submissions that were made on behalf of the Crown was as set out in paragraph 189, "It is not for an accused person in a criminal trial to choose whether she wants to participate in the proceedings nor is it for them to dictate the course of the proceedings".


There's then reference to section 617 which his Honour did actually invoke to remove her for the trial but in paragraph 190, the Court says, "The DPP submission must be accepted. The learned trial Judge was anxious to exercise the power conferred in him by 617.2 to no greater extent than was necessary to enable the trial to proceed because of the fundamental of 617.1 which is that criminal proceedings must be held, or should be held in the presence of the accused".


BENCH: Mmm. But - well, he's saying and I'm quoting from his e-mail, "Because of my brain"- this is an e-mail of the 31st of August 2010, "because of my brain injury I cannot argue/debate in real time. This means I cannot appear verbally. All my submissions must be in writing including in determining special measures to accommodate my special needs in cross-examining the police witnesses". He says, "I need to debate in writing yet you persist in demanding that I permit myself to suffer discrimination through appearing by phone or in person; that is in real time".


He then goes on to say, "I'm prepared to discuss special measures by e-mail". He won't be specific in what measures he requires. The Court has allowed Mr Mathews regular breaks throughout the proceedings, thus far, over and above what is normal.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: He's allowed to have his assistance dogs in Court.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: Something which is not normally done. I consider that this Court has by these measures provided him with special measures. He wants more but won't articulate them apart from saying he wants to cross-examine witnesses when he loses concentration to go away and do something else and come back to it.


In his e-mail correspondence I think he is saying he wants to cross-examine by shuttle or in writing. That would be unworkable and as I say, if I did even contemplate such a course, it may well be doing an injustice to him. He wants and he would not be able to properly test the evidence in that way. And as I said, there is some support to his plight, given to his plight, his brain injury by Dr Moyle. He provides information on his injury and its effects and youíve gone into that.


Further e-mail 29th of June 2010, he says, "Where I am forced to perform abstract/conscious thinking with potential loss to me for diminished performance the resulting anxiety exacerbates my concentration disability which then feeds back into heightening my anxiety. This has occurred over the past three days in the Magistrates Court". And I would have thought that if committed for trial if the evidence is sufficient, I haven't reached that point, but if the evidence is sufficient and he is committed, it's likely to happen in the trial.


MR HUNTER: What a referral under section 20B?


BENCH: No. That he's going to - his anxiety's going to be heightened as when he's asked or "if required to perform abstract/conscious thinking with potential loss to me for diminished performance", he says.


MR HUNTER: And how does that place him - we might ask rhetorically how that would place him in a different position to Mr M.


BENCH: But he's raising it; he's raising it in this Court. See, I'm not conducting the trial.


MR HUNTER: No. No. The only issue     


BENCH: These are committal proceedings and     


MR HUNTER: The only issue before your Honour this morning     


BENCH:      the Crimes Act is specific, where it's raised and I think he's raising it in his correspondence. His fitness, I know it doesnít fit     


MR HUNTER: No.


BENCH:      within the normal parameters     


MR HUNTER: No, it doesnít.


BENCH:      for trial issue, but who's to say that if it's shown, you know - you see, I donít have the luxury of up to date reports which I assume a District Court would get on the question. I donít have that luxury. The issue's raised; I'm not determining whether he's fit for trial.


MR HUNTER: No.


BENCH: Because I'm not conducting a trial but I think he's raised it.


MR HUNTER: He's not saying that he's incapable.


BENCH: No.


MR HUNTER: He's only saying that he needs time.


BENCH: Which is an unworkable     


MR HUNTER: Well, he hasnít said he wants to     


BENCH: It's unworkable.


MR HUNTER:      cross-examine by shuttle.


BENCH: Well, what else could he be referring to?


MR HUNTER: Well, he hasnít articulated that.


BENCH: Exactly. And he won't - he won't come in; he won't get on the phone; he won't even put it in e-mail what he wants.


MR HUNTER: No. And in that respect, your Honour, my submission is that he should be required to attend and if he doesnít release the warrant.


BENCH: But I'm still concerned that he's raised the issue, even though he says "I'm fit for trial". I mean, even the most obviously mentally ill person, and Mr Mathews is not that     


MR HUNTER: No.


BENCH:      but even the most obviously mentally ill person, can say to the Court, "I'm fit for trial".


MR HUNTER: Yes. There's no question about that.


BENCH: Yet the Court would think, "Well, I don't think so".


MR HUNTER: Exactly. In which event then it would be incumbent upon the Crown to raise the issue or his counsel. But the medical evidence such that as it is before your Honour, does not say that he is incapable.


BENCH: But you're still looking at it in terms of Pressor?


MR HUNTER: Yes. How do we go outside what is the established law?


BENCH: If somebody can't - if there's prima facie suggestion that somebody because of heightened anxiety, because of their brain injury, brain stem injury, they cannot appear in Court when they're under pressure then, you know, defendant, everyone's under pressure in a courtroom facing indictable offences. If they can't, because of their brain injury and the effects it has on them, heightens their anxiety and they can't appear in Court, how can they be fit to be tried? If they're not legally represented, they have to conduct their own case.


MR HUNTER: Mmm.


BENCH: The Court can't make somebody be represented.


MR HUNTER: But there's no medical evidence that says he's unfit to even turn up; that he's incapable of even turning up to discuss these special measures. He's not physically incapable of attending the courthouse.


BENCH: He says he is, his anxiety's heightened; he can't     


MR HUNTER: Well, he can say     


BENCH: He can't function, he can't function normally; he can't ask a question; he wants to do it by e-mail.


MR HUNTER: Well, your Honour's seen him function for three days.


BENCH: I know. But the whole issue of fitness for trial is a fluid concept.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: It comes and goes; ebbs and flows.


MR HUNTER: And the medical evidence before your Honour, such as it is, doesnít say that he's so paralysed by the anxiety that he's incapable of making his defence.


BENCH: Normal people, even if they hold the Courts in utter contempt, will show a modicum of respect and would appear.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: Mr Mathews is not doing that.


MR HUNTER: No. I have a theory from what little psychology I can remember from     


BENCH: Well, I'm not a psychologist.


MR HUNTER:      from university and perhaps I won't share it with you at the moment.


BENCH: It may well be but I think I'm going to refer it to the District Court. I'm going to send an e-mail to Mr Mathews that the matter will be referred to the District Court. I'm holding that he has raised the issue of his fitness for trial. Whilst it's not within the normal parameters, I think there's scope there for an extended meaning for fitness for trial and I've given my reasons for that; I've quoted his e-mails; referred to Dr Moyle's reports and so that's what I'm going to do.


Under section 20B I'm going to refer him to the District Court. The question now is what you - whether you wish - do you have any objection to him being admitted to bail?


MR HUNTER: Well, he's refused to answer it.


BENCH: He will be required to come in to sign bail. If he doesnít come in to sign bail, a warrant will be issued, if you have no objection to bail?


MR HUNTER: Well, no. It's not as though he's a flight risk. He's not going anywhere.


BENCH: So, he'll be allowed bail on his own undertaking to appear     


MR HUNTER: On a date     


BENCH:      on a date to be determined     


MR HUNTER: The date to be advised.


BENCH:      by the Commonwealth Director but he will have to attend the Court to sign the bail.


MR HUNTER: This Court?


BENCH: This Court. And I think what I should do is for another week, the 22nd of September e-mail correspondence to Mr Mathews, requiring his personal appearance     


MR HUNTER: But only to sign his bail undertaking?


BENCH: Well, yes, because I've referred - I'm going to refer it, unless something happens in the meantime. Although, I think once I've determined that the issue has been raised, I must refer it.


MR HUNTER: That's correct. It's imperative     


BENCH: I can't say well     


MR HUNTER: Section 20B is imperative in its terms.


BENCH: I can't think - like if Mr Mathews shows up next week and says, "I'm right to box on; I'm right to cross-examine those witnesses now"; I can't even not refer it then because I've already determined there's a case on that, I can't think of what it is but     


MR HUNTER: I'm not so sure but I would expect that it would then have to go to the District Court; we bring it on quickly. There would be a trial by jury to find that he is fit to plead as expeditiously as possible then we'll be back here.


BENCH: I donít know what happens in the District Court     


MR HUNTER: Well, under section 20B     


BENCH:      where there's still an ongoing committal.


MR HUNTER: No. What happens in the District Court is a jury will be empanelled     


BENCH: It reverts to the State situation, doesnít it?


MR HUNTER: Yes. A jury will be empanelled and the issue of his fitness will be tried by that jury. If he's found fit to plead, or fit to be tried, the matter will be referred back here.


BENCH: That's right. But the issue would have been determined     


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH:      in the District Court.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: And that's all I'm saying at this stage.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: That needs to be determined. If he's fit, he comes back and we're in the same situation but the Court will have had that issue determined.


MR HUNTER: Yes. And any refusal would be a breach of bail and the relevant consequences would flow.


BENCH: That's right. But all in the future.


MR HUNTER: That's all in the future, yes.


BENCH: So, 9 a.m. Court 20 warrants to lie on file; personal appearance required.


MR HUNTER: In Court 20, thank you.


BENCH: In Court 20.


MR HUNTER: Sorry, your Honour, Wednesday 22nd, was it?


BENCH: The 22nd; I think we'll give it the week.


MR HUNTER: Thank you, your Honour.


BENCH: Thank you, Mr Hunter.


Fraud by Douglas Porter, The University of Queensland, [part of the Australian Government], by defrauding a disabled reclusive old man of his HOUSE & LAND; including Douglas Porter's being linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity

These pages will be developed to expose the defrauding of a disabled, and hence reclusive old man of his house and land at 254 Hawken Drive St Lucia [view MAP] by Douglas Porter, the previous Registrar of The University of Queensland, for use by The University of Queensland.  Douglas Porter had been attacking, bullying and discriminating against this disabled reclusive old man since the early 1990s when he was a mature age student at The University of Queensland.

Porter was closely associated with two others linked to the Attempted MURDER of the disabled old man, being the then recent law lecturers Quentin Bryce, and Patsy Mary Wolfe.  The disabled old man was, at that time, a student of law at the University of Queensland, where Porter was Registrar.  Porter was engaged in bullying 
the disabled old man prior to the Attempted Murder of the disabled old man, and subsequenly, but then with greater  gusto.   Douglas Porter, then, as clandstine Chair of the St Johns College Council, that ran the St Johns College on the St Lucia, Brisbane Campus of The University of Queensland, began to secretly orchestrate the theft of the home of the disabled old man; the house and land owned in trust by the disabled old man, to take advantage of the fact that the disabled old man was under a strident attack..  

LinkToAspinallInPorterPanel.php This Profile Panel re the parasitic Douglas Porter, rewarded by the anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall and the anglican church, because Porter used confidential information obtained as Registrar of The University of Queensland, to assist Phillip Aspinall steal the home of a vulnerable disabled guy links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud of this vulnerable disabled guy by anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall.

  Douglas PORTER is linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity.
See fat pig parasite Porter playing with himself

  masturbating

in his office. So, what can you expect from The University of Queensland?
Write and tell us what you think about this University.
  Douglas Porter taken at 9:55AM 12th July, 2006 in his office at The University of Queensland where he was at that time, Registrar of The University of Queensland, and also clandestinely, the Representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly Chairman of, the St Johns College Council which runs St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland.  For years prior and years since then, Porter was secretly scheming to steal my home, beneficially owned by me, from me, by threatening and manipulating the emotionally challenged emotional shell of the trustee.

Concurrently, while I was then a student at the Universiity of Queensland, Douglas Porter, as Registrar, repeatedly discriminated against me in relation to my use of the libraries and my being accompanied by my two wee assistance dogs while on the campus of UQ.

Just days before the armed robbery on me on 29th November, 2004, by corrupt cop [and Armed Robber] at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, as a preliminary and integral step towards stealing my property [my home, my beneficially owned house and land], from me, all orchestrated by Douglas Porter, Douglas Porter had that same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala charge me with bogus criminal charges. No doubt this was intended to complicate my life even more than my life was being complicated, on top of my disabilities, by all the Douglas Porter inspired disability discrimination of me in UQ libraries, so making the theft of my home even easier for The University of Queensland.


We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this intellectual lightweight and corrupt gutless parasite .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 .   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 . 

Douglas Porter was The University of Queensland's SECRETIVE/CLANDESTINE representative, [and Chair], on the Governing body of one college, St Johns College at the University of Queensland - [see 7th paragraph of this linked UQ publication] or our copy.   [Of course, The University of Queensland has complete control of that land on which the college is built, with its complicated legal arrangement.]  The Governing body is called the the St Johns College Council [SJCC] and Douglas Porter is the Chair of the SJCC. Important in the workings of St Johns College and the St Johns College Council, is the SJCC Budget.  The Warden of St Johns College is the fraudster the Rev John Morgan.  He is answerable to the SJCC for the running of SJC.  In particular, he is petrified of his spending being in excess of the SJCC budget.  He even attempts to defraud to avoid spending money that is not in the SJCC budget.  Earlier that year, Morgan admitted lying to me the previous year, so that he would not have to face up to the St Johns College Council [SJCC], for having spent money that he was legally required to spend, that was, however, not in the SJCC budget.  

Hence, SJCC is a part of the Australian Government Sector, as is The University of Queensland.  Also involved in this fraud were other divisions of the Australian Public Sector, namely the Brisbane City Council, Queensland Police [including the most senior level, on the evidence of the Queensland Police], Queensland Courts especially Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and Supreme Court Judge Henry George Fryberg. Others were involved for the money they would make from it and to be "on the in" with corrupt public sector parasites.  These include lawyer Stephen Tonge, [view home of Tonge on MAP]  then a partner of Firm of lawyers Flower & Hart but more recently of Tress Cox.  Some Capital Funding was provided by the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church aka the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Paul de Jersey, is the Chancellor of the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC].  They provided the funding for an expected return [albeit fraudulent] of approximately 20% year on year plus a locked in Capital Gain well in excess of CPI indexation.

Because the Australian Government has been involved in defrauding this disabled reclusive old man, this matter, and his being defrauded of his Commonwealth Disability Support Pension by Centrelink, will end up coram/before UN committees in Geneva pursuant to Australia's acceding to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.   The Corrupt Australian Government and all parts of it involved in this widespread fraud should be greatly shamed and we will expose them.

The Queensland Court of Appeal, the highest court in Queensland, has recently spoken on this matter.  [It was written up in the Brisbane newspaper as "Talk of the Legal World".], However, there is far more to come.

RussellMathewsEmailSignatureDRA

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
International Disability Rights Advocate
invoking
UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
& UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
See my RESOUNDING VICTORY 20th July, 2010 in
Qld Court of Appeal

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of
      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND
Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]

linksforumworldrecession
Links to our FORUMS regarding the 21st Century World Recession, SURVIVING IT & PROSPERING.
  1. 21st Century World Recession
  2. Analysis of the 21st Century World Recession
  3. FULL detail of the Analysis of 21st Century World Recession
  4. How to SURVIVE the 21st Century World Recession, & PROSPER
  5. In detail: How to SURVIVE the 21st Century World Recession, & PROSPER.
  6. Looking for Work: Looking for a Job:
  7. How to FIND A JOB, & MAKE MONEY doing it!!
  8. FULL detail: How to FIND A JOB, & MAKE MONEY doing it!!
  9. FULL detail: How to FIND A JOB, & MAKE MONEY FINDING it, and REAL MONEY doing it!!
  10. FULL DETAIL: Looking for Work: Looking for a Job:
  11. Small Business Advisory FORUM
  12. Full Description, Small Business Advisory Forum.
I have addressed this way forward, depending upon one's predilection, based on one's past actions or inclinations: Income from working for an 'employer' or working in one's own business.

  1. Looking for Work: Looking for a Job: How to FIND A JOB, & MAKE MONEY doing it!!
  2. Small Business Advisory FORUM
HaigReport Themes

Themes of  Websites
for the
HAIG   REPORT: Group of Websites:
[We expect, in time, to have all of the thousands of pages on the
HAIG   REPORT: group of websites accessible from this Menu of THEMES. Eventually, there will be 20 themes, each with an average of 15 to 20 websites/domains/directories, with each website/domain having an average of 20 pages. This would equate to 20 x (15 to 20) x 20 = 6,000 to 8,000 pages. This menu of Themes will be included near the bottom of each page, in time. With one line of code, strategically placed, this Menu of Themes is now on thousands of pages. We are continually and progressively adding pages to this Menu of Themes of website Menus.]

commonheader.php

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.  
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      EMAIL us anytime:  Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay. 

Menu: HaigReport'sThemes or Categories of the the Topics of the HaigReport Group of Websites: 
© COPYRIGHT: Russell Gordon Haig Mathews 2002 - 2018

The LATEST ADDITIONS are added to the top:


See  All 67 Domain Names in the HaigReport Group 

© COPYRIGHT: Russell Gordon Haig Mathews 2002 - 2018

Now here are the THEMES:



  1. Commonwealth of Australia Knowingly Employs LIARS, CHEATS and CRIMINALS:


  2. Government Corruption Infecting Corporates; ASX:


  3. New ADDITIONAL platform; Printed Distributed HaigReport NEWSPAPER:


  4. Self Help Law: Do your own Legals/Law:


  5. International: Corrupt Politics & Corrupt religion:


  6. About HaigReport Group of Websites including
    Vote One Russell Mathews:


  7. Russell Mathews [BCom BSc LLB & BA] Commentary additional to the rest of these Websites:


  8. Legal Rights, & BLACKLISTS of parasite residents & tenants in rental accommodation:


  9. RAMPANT POLICE CORRUPTION Exposed by HaigReport Websites; Publicize Your Complaint Here:


  10. Other public sector corruption Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  11. RELIGION Corruption CRIME & PAEDOPHILIA Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  12. Qld Govt Translink wankers & pony spankers Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  13. Corrupt JUDGES, COURTS, & TRIBUNALS Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  14. Corrupt LAWYERS Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  15. Corrupt POLITICANS Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  16. University of Qld Fraud & Corruption Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  17. Corruption at other universities; Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  18. Expose' of Other CORRUPTION, including TELSTRA, under influence of public sector parasites, as exposed by the HaigReport Group of Websites:


  19. Business Promoted by HaigReport Websites:


  20. Finance by HaigReport Websites:

This page is part of the Internet presence of

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
View list of SOME of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html


SEE WHAT I PLAN TO DO ABOUT IT!


Image
CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE