HAIG    REPORT:    GoTo [on this page] HaigReport's Menu Of Themes of Menus for our thousands of pages
TIPS for
Navigating HaigReport:  If you arrived at this page, referred from a Search Engine such as Google et al, your URL link will NOT have an #Anchor/Marker to take you to the relevant spot on this page.  In that case, we do recommend that you view our "Latest HaigReport Promotions" of recent additions to our websites, by Clicking Here.  It will open in a new Browser window. 

If
you Click Here, you will be taken, usually, to the specific Unique Content on this page, for which you were most likely seeking.  However, if you Click Here, you will be taken to the Top of the HaigReport Header, below on this page. 

However, if you have arrived at this page from another of our Website pages, your link will usually have an #Anchor, also called a marker, which will take you to the intended specific spot on the page where that marker is positioned.  In fact, it will probably take you there prior to your reading this.  Moving to that Anchor is the final step in the loading of this page.

 HAIG     REPORT:   Is now on  twitter  [from 2nd June, 2013]  link to us HERE on twitter     See our Twitter Strategy     Follow @HaigReport

 HAIG    REPORT:  SEE: Russell Mathews' COMMENTARY:    Russell Mathews' [BCom BSc LLB & BA] current TOPICAL commentary on GOVERNMENT, politics & business     Press to READ       Press for MENU   

 HAIG    REPORT:    WANTED:
Healthy female "dog" to breed with Parson Russell Terrier, to produce ASSISTANCE DOGS.   Rochedale South QLD 4123
I wish to breed from my Parson Russell Terrier. He is a trained assistance dog. He has a wonderful nature. The breed of his mate could be varied or a cross; eg Parson Russell Terrier, Jack Russell Terrier, Beagle, Bull Terrier, Bull mastiff, Staffy, and/or Fox Terrier plus many others. She does not need to be "pedigreed". I am very protective of my dogs. She will become very valuable to me and become one of my assistance "dogs". If we can assist each other, please contact me on my contact form, including your email address and your landline phone number so I can phone you to discuss. 

Because I am disabled and have an LLB [so therefore understand the Law surrounding disabilities and assistance dogs] I am now branching out to providing Assistance dogs to disabled persons [even if disabled in only a minor way and so not even realizing it]. This is not a business proposition but rather just a very necessary service I can offer to the community.
Many people have a disability and do not realize their ailment or "problem" is by law, the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA], classified as a "disability". This is especially so for people getting on in years, and who have a dog, and are maybe moving to accommodation where they are told they cannot take their dog. In a majority of cases, those people cannot be legally forced to surrender their animal/dog.
I will be assisting those person who already have dogs, but are being forced, unlawfully, to dispose of them because maybe they are moving accommodation. I can train your existing dogs to be assistance dogs and provide the documentation as required by the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA]. I do not intend to charge for this, but just maybe cover some marginal costs.

    View the Latest    HAIG     REPORT Promotions:  in this Scrolling Window, or OPEN in new browser:     

 Click here  to Learn about your Personalized Alert Notice [IMMEDIATELY BELOW] prepared by our HAIG Unique Visitor Algorithm: [HUVA] or  Click here  to see your UNIQUE Personalized Alert Notice in a new Browser Window.


 Transcript of My Oral Submission on the day, 25th November, 2011, in Qld Court of Appeal, against Qld police corrupt charges to coverup Qld Government Armed Robbery of disabled citizen, before Magistate Paul M Kluck:


My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies. The HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies.

   It is Our legal, social and moral DUTY to EXPOSE CRIME, FRAUD & CORRUPTION plus Lying and Hypocrisy in Public Life, Including Judges & magistrates 
 

Fraud, Corruption & attempted  MURDER 
covered-up by Queensland police, EXPOSED 

header: Queensland Court of Appeal on Trial

CourtOfAppealOnTrialJusticeMargaretAMcMurdoACPresidentQueenslandCourtofAppeal  Queensland Court of Appeal on Trial CourtOfAppealOnTrialJusticeMargaretAMcMurdoACPresidentQueenslandCourtofAppeal

commonheader.php

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.  
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      EMAIL your advice:  Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay. 

considerevidence.php

Consider the evidence! Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay.  

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Transcript of My Oral Submission on the day, 25th November, 2011, in Qld Court of Appeal, against Qld police corrupt charges to coverup Qld Government Armed Robbery of disabled citizen, before Magistate Paul M Kluck

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Transcript of My Oral Submission on the day, 25th November, 2011, in Qld Court of Appeal, against Qld police corrupt charges to coverup Qld Government Armed Robbery of disabled citizen, before Magistate Paul M Kluck

See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

 Content: Transcript of My Oral Submission on the day, 25th November, 2011, in Qld Court of Appeal, against Qld police corrupt charges to coverup Qld Government Armed Robbery of disabled citizen, before Magistate Paul M Kluck

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
included20111124_TranscriptOralSubmissiontAppealKJOBDecision.html

Transcript of Oral Submission on the day, 25th November, 2011, for

APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL UNDER

THE DISTRICT COURT ACT 1967, S 118



In the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court of Queensland


The Queen against Russell Gordon Haig Mathews


The details of the judgment appealed against are—

Date of judgment: 21st June, 2011.

Name of Primary Court Judge: His Honour Kerry John O”Brien DCJA

Location of District Court: Brisbane.

Offence(s) of which convicted: None, yet, still.

Sentence: None

Part of judgment appealed against: The continued and continual denial of Due Process in a quagmire of judicial nullity.

Address: PO Box 784, Rochedale South, Qld 4123.

  1. The contentions herein are in the alternative to the extent of any inconsistency.

  2. As I have brain damage and am unable to organize my thoughts to compose my speech in real time, I prepare my speech in writing over a period of time.

  3. This is what I have prepared for my application for leave to appeal on 25th November, 2011. For the convenience of the Court and to assist the Court, I now make it available ahead of time to the Court and the CDPP prosecution.

  4. This Court of Appeal [CA] hearing is far from the end of the line. The CA could do itself no harm by exposing the Armed Robbery, the irrevocable evidence of which is before the CA, now that it is fully coram the CA, rather than skirting around it, as the CDPP and Shane Hunter of the CDPP have wanted to do and continue to want to do, to perpetrate the exploitation of a disabled person, a disabled Australian citizen, by the Australian Public Sector including the Commonwealth DPP.

  5. Many persons may realise and maybe appreciate that I object to being targeted, cheated and defrauded because I am vulnerable and disabled.

  6. I have been advised recently of the Coram of the CA for this Application.

  7. I request that both of Your Honours White and Douglas disqualify yourselves, individually on the grounds that a reasonably informed bystander would form a reasonable apprehension of bias by each of you to myself, in regard to the events and personalities as I shall hereunder relate.

  8. For Douglas J. this contention is based on the condition that he is related to, as cousin, “second cousin” or otherwise to the female Fran Douglas previously of the Queensland Crown Law office. Perchance that is not the case, I withdraw my request as relates to His Honour Douglas J. Douglas J. had previously advised me of this connection in an action by me in his court.

  9. A company of which I was Managing Director employed a Joanne Barker in 1988/89. A condition of employment to which Barker agreed in writing was that she would undertake computer training with another company of which I was a director.

  10. Her parents did not think she should have to pay for her training. Barker was an adult at the time.

  11. The validity of such a traineeship arrangement is shown in that such have now become standard and recommended by governments. Now, because of the way I have been treated by governments, and although I have great ability in this area and in teaching, the Australian community no longer gains such benefit from me.

  12. When she owed substantial funds for her training, she stole records of the company including her employment contract and employment and training records.

  13. I reported this to the police. She lied to the police.

  14. In response, with the assistance of her friend the female Fran Douglas referenced above, she made a bogus complaint of sexual harassment against me to the HREOC.

  15. To aggravate the complaint to one of a criminal nature, Joanne Barker, with the advice and assistance of Fran Douglas, who was familiar with the victimisation provisions of the Sex Discrimination Act made repeated additional bogus complaints of subsequent fictional threats to Joanne Barker [now Joanne Madigan] from me, in writing to the HREOC.

  16. I was unaware of these complaints of alleged victimisation. The HREOC, under the direction of Quentin Bryce, harassed me and my elderly retired parents who were directors of my companies.

  17. I was not prepared to be harangued in their secret “conciliations”and told them they could take it to a Human Rights Tribunal hearing if they wished.

  18. A HREOC, under the direction of Quentin Bryce, hearing coram Kevin Patrick O'Connor ensured.

  19. O'Connor was secretly provided by John Joseph Armstrong for the HREOC, under the direction of Quentin Bryce,, with these written complaints of victimisation. I was unaware of the existence of these complaints or these documents. The contents were not made known to me. O'Connor expressed general outrage at my supposed conduct without specifying any detail.

  20. After O'Connor's negative decision, I sought Judicial Review in the Federal Court.

  21. I sued O'Connor, Quentin Bryce, HREOC and others.

  22. Spender J. conducted the Judicial Review.

  23. Patsy Mary Wolfe, as a barrister, represented all defendants with the exception of Quentin Bryce, who was unrepresented. Wolfe made particular note of specifying this to Spender J. who emphatically queried that expressing disbelief.

  24. Patsy Wolfe and Spender J. caucused in Spender's chambers.

  25. Since Quentin Bryce and Patsy Mary Wolfe are close personal friends from their time at the Law School at The University of Queensland, and since Quentin Bryce was the Director of HREOC in Brisbane, it can be expected that they had discussed this case.

  26. It can also be presumed that Quentin Bryce expected that she did not need to be represented coram the Federal Court. Clearly, she knew what the outcome would be.

  27. I contend that an explanation is that Bryce knew the improper acts which were to transpire, so she reasoned that she could appear to keep a greater distance from the improper fraudulent actions by Spender and Wolfe, by not having Wolfe represent her. I contend that if Quentin Bryce was not culpable, she should have advised the Federal Court of what was about to transpire. She did not.

  28. John Joseph Armstrong was “counsel assisting” the Human Rights Hearing coram O'Connor.

  29. John Joseph Armstrong supplied the Federal Court with an affidavit of the details of the case coram O'Connor. He included the “bogus victimisation complaints” in a black vinyl folder as Exhibit JJA3. He referred to this JJA3 as “background information” in that affidavit.

  30. In THE CIRCUMSANCES the written prejudicial documents supplied to O'Connor without my knowledge and without my being able to comment thereupon, made O'Connor's decision void ab initio. HREOC, under the direction of Quentin Bryce, had claimed in the Federal Court to enforce O'Connor's decision.

  31. Spender J. purported to enforce the void ab initio decision of O'Connor.

  32. Patsy Mary Wolfe disgraced and violated her paramount duty to the court; to bring relevant evidence and law to the notice of the court if the opposing party does not.

  33. Of course, Spender and Wolfe have judicial and advocates immunities respectively to protect them from redress for their fraud against me.

  34. To tangle the web of deception even more, the Registry of the Federal Court in Brisbane and HREOC have collaborated/colluded to replace the documents in both of their copies of JJA3 with copies of other documents from other exhibits to that same affidavit. This occurred only after I had learned in my law studies of the illegality of what occurred and began publicising that to parliamentarians.

  35. This adds a much greater level of criminality to this fraudulent farce. It was clearly done to protect the reputations of Spender, Bryce and Wolfe.

  36. There are many ways that these crimes can be proven.

  37. I contend that the reason that these fraudsters acted against my interests was related to the fact that I am disabled and so was known to be an easy target.

  38. It is readily proved that Spender J. knew of my disability from 1974 when he, as a barrister in collusion with the fraudster Terry Mellifont and parasites in the employ of Queensland Rail, defrauded me because I was severely disabled with brain damage and Obstructive Sleep Apnoea [OSA], and when I had employed fewer strategies to cope with my brain damage, and manage my OSA, than I have subsequently.

  39. Working in Crown Law, Fran Douglas had access to much detailed information relating to my disability and so saw me as an easy target and mark.

  40. The fact that at all of that happened then, and that these four charges are happening now, is related to my disability.

  41. Patsy Mary Wolfe has an additional connection. KJOB as District Court Judge Administrator is 2IC to Wolfe as Judges of the DC. They reportedly have a most amicable working relationship.

  42. KJOB failed to consider my application for him to disqualify himself. He used my disability to assist him in that pursuit.

  43. Her Honour Margaret White JA, wife of Dr Michael White who cheated me in the only Maritime Law exam I did at The University of Qld Law School, has, during an interlocutory hearing in the Qld Supreme Court, in a civil action I was bringing, claimed Quentin Bryce and Patsy Wolfe as her closest personal friends. All three had been contemporaneously lecturers in the Law School at the University of Qld. On that occasion I had requested Her Honour Margaret White JA, to disqualify herself for apprehended bias. When such an application is made, it is for the particular decision maker to make the decision. I said to White J that it was her decision. White J. then replied that since I was no longer requesting her to disqualify herself, [what?], she would not disqualify herself, and then proceeded to improperly strike out all my quite acceptable pleadings, which I still have in that original form. That was disability discrimination. I gained a very high mark on my “pleadings assignment” in my LLB, [and it was all my own work]. I wonder if White J. did better in her equivalent assignment.

  44. With that and the Fryberg J. Vexatious Litigant decision with respect to the Brisbane City Council, decision in the presence of the Brisbane City Council letter which is also coram Your Honours, at Exhibit 3:

    E:\RussellMATHEWS-17July09\haigreport.com/20041125BCCentrynotice_cr01.jpg /, does anyone wonder that the courts of law are becoming progressively less important as mere relics of history?


  1. Given their past involvements and improper if not illegal actions, Patsy Mary Wolfe, Quentin Bryce, Dr Michael White and Fran Douglas will wish to see me lose and be kept down. I am sure they would like to see me disappear.

  2. The level of onus for this evidence is not beyond reasonable doubt, nor even on the balance of probabilities but just “raised on the evidence”. It is unnecessary to raise it to any level of probability but just to be “reasonably possible”, that means, not unreasonable, or fanciful. It is not fanciful to believe that Douglas J, would wish to protect his relative from such as these revelations and similarly, that White JA would wish to protect her two closest personal friends, together or individually from these revelations, and so prevent my winning this appeal.

  3. All that is necessary is that any bystander, when reasonably informed, may form a reasonable apprehension of bias.

  4. With the connection of White JA. and Douglas J. individually to party or parties involved in these fraudulent entreprise or entreprises, I contend that a reasonably informed bystander would form a reasonable apprehension of bias. Hence, White JA. and Douglas J. should individually disqualify themselves, and I so request.

  5. With the recent exposure of the corruption and or scandal at The University of Qld [UQ], which has long been the Cradle of Official, Judicial and Government corruption in Qld resulting from the control of the Senate of UQ by the same corrupt Qld Government that has appointed most current judges in Qld and is associated with most if not all persons mentioned herein, the prospect of systemic corruption is raised to more than the level required for apprehended bias.

  6. I expect that the detail of far more UQ corruption will be exposed in time.

  7. The Armed Robbery of 29th November, 2004, clearly referenced herein, was a step in the process of stealing my house from me and it is now being used in the service of UQ, and the stealing of my home was orchestrated by Douglas Porter the then Registrar of UQ in his capacity as Official Representative of UQ.

  8. If a person has committed an armed robbery, that person can hardly complain that he is offended to be called an armed robber on a website, and such a description of an armed robber can hardly be unlawful.

  9. That the police and CDPP would proceed with such a prosecution, shows that they much have expected courts would be compliant and agreeable to the systemic corruption in Qld that is here disclosed.

  10. I trust the Court of Appeal realises I have a long way to go with this matter of systemic corruption that has cost me my home, house and land, and much grief besides.

  11. As clearly shown in paragraphs 110. to 119., there is in the order of a 99.9999% likelihood that I have borne the brunt of massive corruption by elements of the Queensland and now Australian Government.

  12. While I do not necessarily allege any wrong doing by White JA, I contend that, because the result of the above referenced action by White JA to strike out my quite adequate pleading, had a concurrently equal effect to the result of the acts giving rise to the calculation of the 99.9999% probability of intentional corruption by elements of the Qld government, [and that is to act against my interests to show the fraud to which I have been subjected], a reasonably informed bystander would apprehend a reasonable probability of bias by White JA towards me.

  13. I suggest, as an aside, that had Fryberg J not made his decision labeling me a Vexatious Litigant in respect to the Brisbane City Council, to defeat my claim against the Brisbane City Council [as referenced in paragraph 44. herein and paragraphs 53 to 55 of my Outline of argument], and had White JA not struck out my quite adequate pleading, [both suggesting the futility of expecting the Queensland Courts to facilitate justice to a disabled citizen], these four charges would not have arisen, for a number of reasons.

  14. Now that I have read the reasons for Decision by Margaret Wilson AJA in Tierney v Commissioner of Police [2011] QCA 327,

    http://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2011/QCA11-327.pdf

    I request that Margaret Wilson AJA also disqualify herself on the grounds that a reasonably informed bystander would form a reasonably apprehension of bias by Margaret Wilson AJA towards me as a disabled person with brain damage.

  15. Disabled persons in Australia now must produce medical evidence, that the would be discriminator accepts before the disabled person's special needs are accommodated. This is the substance of this unanimous precedent of the Qld Court of Appeal.

  16. This

    http://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2011/QCA11-327.pdf

    is a unanimous precedent from the Qld Court of Appeal.  This may be distinguished to "anxiety or panic attacks" in a judicial setting, but the principle could be argued for all situations.   Importantly, in most commercial setting, following this case, the potential discriminator would not owe a duty of Natural Justice,  However the facts of this case do not restrict the precedent to "anxiety or panic attacks" but the wider factual disabilities stated in the evidence.

  17. Now, the Disability discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA] may not apply to "judicial officers" but I contend that the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD] would apply in a court where the CDPP was prosecuting.  There is much judicial comment, ratio and dicta, that the international treaties strongly influence Australia's Common Law as well.  I refer to my contention and supported argument in paragraphs 37 to 45 inclusive of my “Outline of Argument plus Submission”, in this application.  

  18. I suggest that this could be the thin edge of the wedge. I suggest that since this is a CA decision, it will soon be discussed as precedent.

  19. In particular, in regard to alleged bias by Margaret WilsonAJA, I reference paragraph 44 in that decision:

    [44] Sometimes defendants suffer from physical and or other disabilities which do not meet the criteria of unfitness for trial, but which nevertheless make participation in court proceedings difficult for them. In the fair conduct of a proceeding, the presiding judicial officer can be expected to make reasonable procedural allowances. For example, if someone has a back condition which results in his suffering pain if he sits for a long time, the presiding judicial officer can be expected to ensure that there are rest breaks as required. Similarly, if someone’s first language is not English, but he is nevertheless able to understand and converse in English, albeit when the vocabulary and sentence structures used are kept simple, the presiding judicial officer can be expected to ensure that that is done. Again, if someone suffers from anxiety or panic attacks (for which there is medical evidence which the presiding judicial officer accepts) the presiding judicial officer can be expected to take appropriate steps to ensure he is not unduly harassed or put under pressure. In making procedural allowances the presiding judicial officer needs to be ever mindful of his or her fundamental obligation to ensure that the trial is conducted fairly to both sides: this may involve judicious balancing of the special needs of the defendant against the right of opposing counsel to cross-examine meaningfully and, if appropriate, quite robustly.

  20. What is the legal import of “Can be expected”? Does that mean it is discretionary? Since magistrates and judges have judicial immunity, their future will be little effected, regardless of whatever they do.

  21. Of course, ”unduly” and ”robustly” opens a pandora's box. To what extent can such a disabled person be “harassed and put under pressure”, and if a person is not disabled in this way, is it open slather, with unrestrained “robust” harassment and pressure permitted?

  22. That would suggest that police prosecutors can now “try it on” with disabled people with brain damage, to see how far they can repeatedly press the point before the magistrate intervenes. I would suggest that this ratio will encourage police prosecutors to be as “robust” as possible in harassing defendants and defence witnesses, in ALL police prosecutions. They now have a unanimous Court of Appeal decision supporting such “robust harassment”; an Australia wide precedent.

  23. This decision, at the least, lacks circumspection.

  24. This above quoted excerpt from that decision is at http://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2011/QCA11-327.pdf para 44 on page 10.

  25. I foresee this precedent for this principle being raised in many more disability cases and in legal replies to AHRC requests for response.

  26. Paragraph 45 continues this latest approach:

    [45] A perusal of the transcript [???? ] shows that the applicant did not in fact suffer any disadvantage. He gave evidence fluently, [???? in a transcript?] and was able to remember precisely [you may understand how some disabled people with Brain damage will adapt and try to hide the effects of their disability and become practiced at it] the words he said to the complainant and what happened after the alleged assault. The transcript reveals that the prosecutor was courteous to him in the course of crossexamination, and that he [sic] did not overstep the mark, despite the applicant’s asking him [sic], “Are you here in Court today not getting paid?” In the absence of any properly raised issue regarding the applicant’s medical conditions, there was no obligation on the prosecutor to take any special measures in cross-examination. In the circumstances there was no basis upon which the magistrate could have properly intervened in the cross-examination, let alone any obligation on his Honour to do so.

  27. Magistrates and Judges of the Court of Appeal are not medical experts, usually. Perhaps this case is an exception. This situation is very similar to the situation regarding fitness to stand trial, where expert evidence is mandatory, as per Sec20B Crimes Act 1914. This case is in the same dimension as fitness to stand trial, but maybe at a different point in that dimension. This ratio seems exceedingly flimsy.

  28. It now appears that at law, we have a proxy for mental capacity. That proxy is “fluency”. Is mental capacity equivalent to fluency in delivery or does fluency imply mental capacity, which seems to be the “ratio” here, or does lack of fluency imply lack of mental capacity? The extent of brain damage can range over a continuum. Does the point in that continuum of Special needs requiring accommodation, occurring, coincide with the demarcation between fluency and non-fluency; the point where a nominal “person” becoming non-fluent as the parameter of degree of brain damages increases, assuming the variables of fluency and mental capacity, are not inversely related? I wonder whether poor Melisa Avery was fluent; apparently not? I wonder what an expert witness would say. I may have the opportunity to ask an expert under oath, at some time.

  29. We now come to another logical doosey under the heading of 'Inconsistencies”.

    [55] In his consideration of the applicant‘s ground of appeal based on inconsistencies in the evidence, the judge rejected Mr Mathews‘ submissions that the prosecution case involved inconsistent scenarios, that the applicant was facing two sets of particulars, and that for him to provide defences in relation to both was unfair. His Honour noted that both the defence witnesses and the applicant asserted that the incident did not occur, and that no particular defence was excluded by means of this approach.

  30. Margaret Wilson AJA noted this without disapproval. Firstly, paragraph 55 is poorly expressed. Paragraph 55 also shows a poor understanding of logic. The assertion that “ no particular defence was excluded by means of this approach”, is clearly and patently wrong. Simply rejecting an allegation, does not mean that no other defences are possible. For each inconsistent action scenario, there is a potential possibility to show how that scenario is impossible. That is a defence. There are an uncountably large number of possible defences to each scenario That is the case for each inconsistent action scenario. For any particular defence to one scenario, such defence may have a bearing on one or more other defences to another inconsistent action scenario. Although the action scenarios are inconsistent, they are not independent. They do not need to have a correlation of one to be not independent. That means one defence may have a bearing on a defence to an inconsistent scenario.

  31. Because a prosecution is alleging inconsistent action scenarios, when all bar one, at least, are fanciful, it would be possible by studious application to “box in” an innocent defendant.

  32. Because the prosecution is alleging inconsistent action scenarios, and therefore some, if not all would be fanciful, the defences could be inconsistent.

  33. In the name of equity, prosecutorial inconsistencies should be banned, especially in the case of an individual.

  34. Margaret Wilson AJA has thus approved a logically impossible contention. This occurred in the context of an individual raising the disability of Brain Damage.

  35. As 'duty' is absolute, this unanimous decision with a high ranking precedent, in all Australian States, means that that any Magistrate's penchant or desire to deliver a Fair Hearing is now no longer an absolute duty, but is merely no more than discretionary. He can choose now whether he needs to intervene or simply put his mind into "standby' mode. He can 'pass the buck', if he wishes,[or not even bother contemplating it but merely continue in his role, in "standby mode", in the charade with already predetermined outcome], to the defence counsel and solicitors, or to anyone else if at all..

  36. This is the basis of this decision; the pivot of this decision, a strong precedent, being a unanimous decision of the highest court in a State of Australia, and having precedent on all courts in Australia bar the High Courts of Australia. I expect that this case will be widely cited across Australia.

  37. Whenever the prospect of disability of a defendant or witness is raised, because such can lead to denial of Natural Justice and denial of equality before the law, a magistrate must realise that he must be vigilant to the greater possibility of denial of due process ensuring. That is the magistrates job. It may be a little more difficult, than is usual, [but as recognised in the Melissa Avery decision, disability especially intellectual, mental and brain injury disability is increasing in prevalence before magistrates courts] but then, being a magistrate is surely not an unskilled pursuit, or is that the intention.

  38. The nuance in this case was lost on the full Court of Appeal. It was unnecessary to prove to the CA that Jim Tierney was disabled and the extent of that disability. It was also unnecessary to show that to Magistrate Spencer. As such disability, as was the case with Jim Tierney, and WHICH CAN STILL BE PROVED, was likely to cause an unfair hearing, which did occur and can still be proven, the magistrate should have been vigilant to ensure that an unfair hearing did not ensue.

  39. I suggest that it is possible that a reasonably informed bystander, informed of these matters and this situation could reasonably sense that there was a predetermined stance, by Margaret White AJA, to find against Jim Tierney because he was disabled and because I, Russell Mathews, also disabled, was associated with him, and it was known that I had this appeal before the CA and I had already submitted my Outline of Argument and Written Submission. I contend that such would suggest that that bystander could reasonably sense that there was a predetermined stance, by Margaret White AJA, to find against me , Jim tierney and all people disabled with brain damage, as well. Thus I request Margaret Wilson AJA to disqualify herself in this matter.

  40. As

    http://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2011/QCA11-327.pdf is now strong precedent in Australia, and possibly internationally as a Judicial Interpretation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, this case could be cited internationally.

  41. I suggest that it will be submitted that this is a logical extension to Sec54A(5) DDA. Here, "counsel and solicitor" could parallel a disabled person's carer.  Will all carers now need to carry sworn medical evidence of a disabled person's condition, to prevent their charge experiencing Disability Discrimination?

  42. Accommodations of Special needs are not discretionary nor equivalent to concessions or privileges. Hence, it is not a requirement for the disabled person to produce sworn evidence of their disability, if a potential discriminator is not to discriminate against the disabled person. Magistrates, judges and prosecutors have both a duty pursuant to Natural Justice of a fair hearing, and another duty pursuant to disability law, in this hearing of these four charges in particular to the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities & UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to ensure I have a fair hearing and that I am not discriminated against because I am disabled.

  43. If these accommodations of my Special Needs were concessions, then it could be held that I would be required to produce sworn evidence, to qualify. All that is necessary for a disabled person to qualify for the rights pursuant to the DDA and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD] is to be disabled, as defined in both the DDA and CRPD.

  44. In a similar way, it is not a concession, but is a right, that a person with such mental incapacity so that they are not fit to stand trial is not required to stand trial. That right which is the accommodation of special needs, is the duty of the decision maker and the government to extend as Natural Justice. As it is a right rather than a concession, it cannot be conditional upon the disabled person performing any action determined by the discriminator.

  45. Simply because I am forthright in demanding that my special needs are accommodated, does not mean that those accommodations are no longer accommodations but become concessions, a matter of discretion of the decision maker as to if those accommodations are extended.

  46. This case is coram the Court of Appeal because the Qld Police together with the Brisbane City Council have committed an Armed Robbery. This case would not be here in the CA but for that fact. That armed robbery was planned with a degree of meticulous planning, and perpetrated because I was vulnerable as I am disabled with brain damage and so vulnerable and isolated.

  47. The CA needs to send a strong clear message to the police and lower courts that this will not be tolerated. If they do not the CA, may find so much more of its time is taken up with appeals such as this. Surely, the CA will not countenance the government exploiting disabled citizens through criminal acts against them.

  48. I strongly suspect that the armed robbery, the subsequent actions of The University of Queensland and the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church of which the Chief Justice Paul de Jersey is Chancellor, together with the Brisbane City Council, Justice Henry George Fryberg, Magistrate Topsy Turvey aka Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich, Centrelink, SSAT and AAT in Qld, District Court, Anthony Gett, Shane Hunter, [& as per paragraph 85 of my Outline of Argument in particular

    http://HaigReport.com/MyReports/20060410CMCapproveBCCtrespass.pdf

http://HaigReport.com/MyReports/20051108LSCBritonapprovesBCCtrespasserrorreTolt.pdf

http://haigreport.com/page9reInfoCommapproveBCCtrespass.pdf /],

    CMC's Robert Walker, Legal Services Commissioner John Briton, Susan Barker of the Office of Information Commissioner, and Qld Police would not have occurred if the CA had been more forthright long before this.

  1. I further suspect that if the CA does not act now in an appropriately forthright manner, it will find itself sidelined and increasingly irrelevant in a rapidly changing world.


  1. I seek Leave of the Court to accept and consider my Outline of Argument which is greater than the nominated length of 10 pages.

  2. As I am disabled with brain damage and cannot argue orally, my Outline of Argument included extra material that I intended to write to present at the Appeal Hearing, as it was suggested by your registry that such of my “submissions/contentions” should be included in my Outline of Argument.

  3. I seek Leave of the Court to accept and consider my Response to the Outline of Argument of the respondent as a proxy for my oral presentation at the Appeal Hearing on 25th November, 2011.

  4. Because of my disability which prevents my being able to organise my thoughts in real time for oral argument, I write out my speech.

  5. For the convenience of the court and the respondent, I supply that to the court and respondent before time.

  6. I seek Leave of the Court to accept and consider the collection of documents as to the detail of my disability, and the written responses of the CMC and Briton of the Legal Services Commission and Susan Barker of the Office of the Information Commissioner as these were referenced by me in my email submissions to the court, and separately to the prosecution who was repeatedly wanting SWORN evidence of my disabilities, as I attempted to engage in this legal process as demanded under threat of incarceration, in the best way I could as limited by my Disability of Brain Damage.

  7. As the evidence in this appeal which is coram the CA, must be considered by the CA for the CA to determine the question of granting leave, the CA becomes aware that crimes have been committed against me.

  8. These crimes included robbery of me by the Brisbane City Council and its employees and sub-contractors and Qld police including Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony. These crimes also included ARMED robbery of me by the Brisbane City Council and its employees and sub-contractors and Qld police including Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Anthony.

  9. I request that the CA make findings that such crimes have been committed and make appropriate recommendations, within it power and jurisdiction.


  1. On page 15 of the Supplementary Appeal Record Book [SARB}], I refer to http://HaigReport.com/MyReports/


  1. Also, on page 15 I reference http://HaigReport.com/MyReports/20060410CMCapproveBCCtrespass.pdf &

http://HaigReport.com/MyReports/20051108LSCBritonapprovesBCCtrespasserrorreTolt.pdf

  1. Also, in Exhibit 3 coram Your Honours is the

    file \page9reInfoCommapproveBCCtrespass.pdf in the directory haigreport.com /.

    ie

    E:\RussellMATHEWS-17July09\haigreport.com\page9reInfoCommapproveBCCtrespass.pdf

  2. This is online at http://HaigReport.com/page9reInfoCommapproveBCCtrespass.pdf /

  3. This is page 9 of a letter to me from Susan Barker of the Office of the Information Commissioner.

  4. These three bodies, of Qld Government Commissions, together with the Brisbane City Council, and Queensland police all specifically approved the unlawful justification for the armed robbery, being the ridiculous proposition that a section of a public servant composed regulation can over rule a section of a statute approvedafter debate and consideration, by a majority of parliament.

  5. As this was also known to Douglas Porter, the Registrar of The University of Queensland [UQ], as a representative of UQ, that will make six Queensland Government Bodies knowingly approving criminal activity, for the benefit of the State of Queensland.

  6. I suggest there are grounds for the Court of Appeal to establish a “Commission of Inquiry” to investigate these matters.

  7. This case is important and worthy of further investigation due to the number of Government bodies culpably involved, by irrevocable evidence, and the fact that I am disabled and have been exploited by government. I am not important but just a disabled subject. What is important is this attitude to disabled persons in general.

  8. As Robert Walker of the CMC has been involved, the CA should not refer this matter to the CMC, but establish an independent Commission.

  9. The Court of Appeal also has before it, the realisation that the CDPP knows and knew that The Brisbane City Council did not have a court order but relied upon the now, revoked Sec 200 of the Health Regulation, subsidiary to the Health Act 1937

  10. Let us consider some probabilities.

  11. Consider the probability of a trained lawyer, chosen at random making the base error that a Regulation can override a substantive right in legislation or a common law right.

  12. Since that proposition is so rudimentary, it should be so for randomly chosen trained lawyers. Lets consider that that error occurs less frequently than once for every ten trained lawyers. One in ten would suggest a poor training regime for lawyers in Australia. Hence it will be safe to assume 0.1 is the expected probability.

  13. Consider the six errors by, BCC, Qld police, CMC, LSC, OIC & CDPP. Let us assume that the six errors occurred by chance alone, and that they are independent.

  14. In regard to the BCC, or Brisbane City Legal Practice, Joanne Whiting did not understand the precision of the ruse aka artifice as she waived Client Privilege to the central point of the Legal opinion on which they intended to base their mistake of authority for entry. Hence, she, most probably, did not hatch the ruse. Thus, her superior, David Askern was culpable in this fraud, or they each independently made this mistake of law.

  15. There are at least six separate lawyers involved in this proposition that Reg 200 of the Health Regulations would override Sect160 Health Act 1937. If those six were to independently and just by chance, make that error, the probability of that occurring in that way, ie that it happened by chance alone is 0.000001 or 0.0001%. That means, by hard strict logic, the probability that that result occurred other than by chance alone and the result was other than that the six parties were all independent was 99.9999%. That is conclusive that the result was not by chance alone. That is irrevocable proof of collusion and/or corruption as they knew what was expected of them each.

  16. These four charges are just the “tip of the iceberg” that is the organized coverup of the massive fraud. That is ORGANIZED CRIME. The Queensland government is ORGANIZED CRIME.

  17. The court of appeal can decide to get to the bottom of this and expose the fraud, or have the various aspects of this fraud repeatedly returning to the Court of Appeal, High Court of Australia and the UN Committees in Geneva.

  18. Kluck M. recognized that I was adversely affected by my disability, in relation to my ability to cross-examine police witnesses, for the full three days that I attended the committal hearing, He has done that under difficulty for three days.” [ARB line 52 Page 454]


[Signed] Applicant

Date: 24th November, 2011

Place: Brisbane

________________________________________________________________________________

Transcript of Oral Submission on the day, 25th November, 2011, for application for leave to appeal per the District Court Act 1967, s118

Filed on behalf of: Russell Gordon Haig Mathews

Address for service: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Telephone: NIL Email= xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Fax: NIL.

This is Page 11 of 11


 Menu:  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!

PHPincludesCourtOfAppealOnTrial/includedMenuCourtOfAppealOnTrial.php

Menu:  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!!!

  1. Affidavit for Court of Appeal: Why CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe Unfit to be a Judge due Judicial Fraud when barrister:
  2. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form27:
  3. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form29:
  4. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form38 Adduce Evidence:
  5. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Affidavit Adduce Evidence:
  6. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Deny Qualified Privilege Form27:
  7. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Unlawful Order Disability Discrimination Apprehended Bias Form27:
  8. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Unlawful Order Disability Discrimination Apprehended Bias Form29:
  9. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJ Spurious Michael Shanahan Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form27:
  10.  Appeal 25th November, 2011: Police Fraud & Disability Discrimination by Magistrate Paul Kluck, District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien, & CDPP's Shane Hunter:
  11.  Outline of Argument & Submission asAt 31st October, 2011 Appeal Qld Police Fraud & Disability Discrimination by Magistrate Paul Kluck, District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien, & CDPP Shane Hunter:
  12. Respondent's CDPP's Shane Hunter's Lies & Dishonesty in Outline of Argument for CA201/2011 Qld Court of Appeal re Qld police Fraud & Disability Discrimination: Magistrate Paul Kluck; District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien KJOB:
  13. My Response to Lies & Dishonesty in Respondent's CDPP's Shane Hunter's Outline of Argument for CA201/2011 Qld Court of Appeal re Qld police Fraud & Disability Discrimination: Magistrate Paul Kluck; District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien KJOB:
  14. Transcript of My Oral Submission on the day, 25th November, 2011, in Qld Court of Appeal, against Qld police corrupt charges to coverup Qld Government Armed Robbery of disabled citizen, before Magistate Paul M Kluck:
  15. Court of Appeal Short Hearing 25th November, 2011; Reserved Decision; Possible Way Forward - Conclusive Evidence: Armed Robbery; International Scrutiny::
  16. Decision: 13th December, 2011 [James S Douglas & Margaret White], Court of Appeal division of Supreme Court of Queensland Mathews v Commissioner of Police [2011] QCA 368 CA No 201 of 2011: :
  17. My Future Actions, after the 13/12/11 Refusal by Qld Court of Appeal of my Appeal::
  18. My request to the Qld Attorney-General to Honour His Duty to Apply to the Court to Set Aside The Miscarriage of Justice, Vexatious Litigant Order:
  19. Decision 12th August,2005: Justice Margaret White Order Remove To Conceal Fraud By Brisbane City Council & Qld Government BS4337_2005_QSC05-222Mathews_v_Morgan_Ors:
  20. Is Justice Margaret White Using Her Judicial Immunity To REPEATEDLY_Conceal Crime By Her Favoured University Of Queensland to StealHome Of Disabled Old Man?:
  21. The Decision of Glory of the Queensland Court of Appeal:
  22. Transcript: 20050601 Magistrates Court Transcript Fraud by Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich, [aka Magistrate Topsy Turvey, al la Queensland Court of Appeal], John Peden, Ms Prasley & Police Sergeant Terence G IND:
  23. Transcript: 20081217 Magistrates Court Transcript of Fraud & Farce byMagistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich & Police Sgt Cox:
  24. Index: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!
  25. CORRUPT GOVERNMENT Judge Henry George Fryberg protects CORRUPT GOVERNMENT ARMED ROBBERS:
  26. Earlier Mentions of Henry George Fryberg: the former article explains a little extra:


See **** The EVIDENCE **** that ex-police cop parasite Peter Dutton, Liberal Party Federal MP for Dickson, tried, but failed, to close down our website disclosing labor ELECTORAL FRAUD, using corrupt Qld cops.

  Australian Federal Court Judge Jeffrey Spender is criminal scum. See the EVIDENCE

BREAKTHROUGH in Daniel Morcombe case.
We
SCOOPED Channel 7, TV & EXPOSED POLICE CORRUPTION.

See the photo PROOF
 E-Contact us to tell us what you think:

This website is part of the web-presence of

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA

View list of SOME of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html

SEE WHAT I PLAN TO DO ABOUT IT!

Image

CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE


Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA

View list of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html

See our LATEST TOPICS:

HOT NEWS: HARD EVIDENCE:  Joe Hockey & FASCIST CRIMINAL congress

I have been bullied my whole life.  See the reason.  That means that I have had fights my whole life.  You can realize the I detest bullies; that is, bullies that are personal to me, politically domestically which includes corrupt polticians, judges and ,MAGISTRATES  & MAGISTRATESmagistrates, more magistrates, lawyers, lawyers, and police, police, and other public sector parasites, plus, politically INTERNATIONALLY.

20041129 more reduced and cropped photo police Rantala.jpgDCP_0517 Big Big Big A Constable Antony.jpg

















 CORRUPT ARMED ROBBER [with violence] Henri Elias Rantala. 

[see NEW Website on Henri Rantala]  

"PPheeeeew , that is HUUUUGE", he whispered.

Monica Antony [BigA for Antony]

Corrupt Cops  [talk about being the BUTT of humour]   'Does Swine flu [flew] have anything to do with the POLICE AIR WING? '  and who said, 'PIGS WILL FLY'.

SEE WHAT I PLAN TO DO ABOUT IT!

My Qualifications

       Bachelor of Commerce [BCom] [The University of Queensland] - 1978
       Bachelor of Science [BSc] [The University of Queensland]
- 1997
       Bachelor of Laws [LLB]
[The University of Queensland] - 2003
       Bachelor of Arts [BA]
[The University of Queensland] - 2003


   Police Constable Henri Elias Rantala aka 'Minge'  aka 'Dummy'  
20041129 more reduced and
            cropped photo police Rantala.jpg About this parasite , Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, now groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queensland police and Queensland government.
Rantala is a rare case within the Queensland Police Service [QPS] in that he he was "groomed" and "fast tracked" to continue the fraud, corruption and bribery that is the QPS within the wholesale corruption that is the Queensland labor Government.  [One major way to reduce this is the restoration of the Upper House  to the Queensland Parliament, the Legislative Council, as a democratically elected house.  It was abolished by the Queensland labor government in 1922.]  Rantala was groomed to be a police prosecutor, which is one position where police can be particularly corrupt.  As Prosecutors, they had Advocates Immunity.  I have been able to have this parasite under oath in the witness box subject to my cross examination.   In his evidence in chief at "Call Henri Elias Rantala" he produced a litany of lies.   My cross examination of him, and his replies thereto, at My Cross-Examination Of Corrupt Police Parasite Henri Elias Rantala,  are most instructive.  Considering all the subsequent events in the attempted corrupt cover-up of this gross crime of Armed Robbery by the Queensland Government, the extended period of planning activity that went into the perpetration of this Armed Robbery, and the fact that Rantala Left Indooroopilly Station from which he launched this Armed Robbery, targeting me, soon after in January2005, it appears Rantala was in integral part of this armed Robbery targeting me.  Just a few days prior, Douglas Porter, the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, for whom, as its Rep, Porter was orchestrating this Armed Robbery as a step towards stealing my beneficial ownership of my home, house and land, caused an attack on me and then called the police to me, and Rantala appeared..

 I will build in this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form.  This caption will accompany the image of Henri Elias Rantala where ever it appears on our websites.  It will be progressively added to all previous representations of his photo.
We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this parasite .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queensland police and Queensland government.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queensland police and Queensland government. 



   Police Constable Monica Louise Antony aka 'Big A for Antony' 

DCP_0517 Big Big Big A
            Constable Antony.jpg
We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this twit brainwashed with a bidet .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Corrupt cop Monica Louise Antony aka BigA for Antony, SUPER DUMB FEMALE Just consider her answers in my cross-examination of her, now that the police hierarchy has shuffled her out of the way, so she can do no harm to police corruption by her inability to lie convincingly.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Corrupt cop Monica Louise Antony aka BigA for Antony, SUPER DUMB FEMALE Just consider her answers in my cross-examination of her, now that the police hierarchy has shuffled her out of the way, so she can do no harm to police corruption by her inability to lie convincingly. 


../CorruptMagistratesMenu.php ../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

Dumb Cop Henri Rantala UPDATE:


SEE:    Rantala-Gate:  => Qld Police CORRUPTION COVER-UP
& FACE of    Rantala-Gate:

UPDATE:

More PROOF of SENIOR LEVEL POLICE Corruption in Qld

[and not just in Queensland:]
Dumb cop Henri Elias Rantala dumps Superintendent Pointon and Senior cops right into the CORRUPTION MIRE that is Queensland.



"The offensive material has been subsequently been maintained on the internet since that time until the present day.  I have been contacted by Superintendent Pointon, Officers from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, State Crime Operations Command, relatives all asking question about the material from 2006 until the present day."

"The offensive material has been subsequently been maintained on the internet since that time until the present day.  I have been contacted by Superintendent Pointon, Officers from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, State Crime Operations Command, relatives all asking questions about the material from 2006 until the present day."

../CorruptMagistratesMenu.php ../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php
This, above, has been stated in writing in a signed statement by the
Corrupt Police Prosecutor Henri Elias Rantala, dated 21st October, 2009; [20091021].   What he calls "offensive material" is the irrefutable PROOF that Police Officer Henri Elias Rantala, committed an ARMED ROBBERY.  This "offensive material" also includes MY REPORT TO POLICE OF ARMED ROBBERY, which they have ignored.  This statement by Rantala, is now PROOF that the police are AWARE OF THE ARMED ROBBERY and are ignoring my complaint of ARMED ROBBERY, AND BREAKING, ENTERING AND STEALING by Queensland Police and Government officials.   I am trained in law with an LLB apart from my other qualifications.  I know more law that these mug police officers.  The evidence, the  irrefutable PROOF,  is shown on these websites.  It shows that Rantala, while armed, ensured that thieves could ransack my home.  The fact that the thieves pretended they were from Brisbane City  Council is irrelevant, as they did not have a legal right to enter.  The Queensland Parliament sets the process for Council to enter private property.  This involved obtaining a COURT ORDER.  The armed robbers and thieves did not have a court order.  Australia is becoming a REAL POLICE STATE, when police believe they can over-ride STATUTE LAW passed by the legislature.  

That police ignore instances of ARMED ROBBERY, is not unique in Queensland.   Andrew Phillip Scipione the Commissioner of the New South Wales Police Force is GUILTY OF SIMILAR CRIME [cover-up] IN NSW as relates to the case below.



Thieves using ARMED POLICE to detain the owner of the property, and keep the owner of the property separated from his property while the thieves steal the property, happens regularly with Queensland Corrupt Police.   One case occurred on 15th September, 2005 in Cairns when the thieves from St Vincent de Paul Society, with whom Jim Tierney previously of JT's Gym in NSW, were operating a Joint Venture for Charitable Purposes, called "Vinnie's Gym", where Jim Tierney supplied his own labour and his own Gym equipment, valued many years previous, at over $1 million dollars worth.  The thieves from St Vincent de Paul Society had corrupt ARMED police attend and 'escort' Jim Tierney, AT GUN POINT, from his equipment and keep him from it, while they stripped the Gym of Jim Tierney's valuable gym equipment.

On 15th September, 2005,the ARMED police and sparmy callous hypocritical Brisbane based paid staff of St Vincent dePaul Society, arrived unannounced to steal Jim Tierney's one million dollars plus worth of gym equipment, by ostensibly 'closing' the gym. When one of the instructors asked what they should tell the group of very disabled people who were due in that afternoon, the answer from the sparmy hypocritical CEO of the thieving St Vincent dePaul Society was 'life is tough'. In an effort to calm the situation, "Enough," said Judith Tierney.


Police Armed Robbery Elsewhere

This has been a case of POLICE THUGGERY.  This, my case, is not a unique case of armed police using their position, to detain property owners, to enable thieves to rob them. Another documented case occurred in 2002 at Queanbeyan, with ARMED ROBBER scum pig Leslie Charles Gilroy  employed by Andrew Phillip Scipione the Commissioner of the New South Wales Police Force



../CorruptMagistratesMenu.php ../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php


  Directory re


 Tax & Investment Planning Services - 1982 to 1989
 [TIPS] [Townsville]


TIPS for TAX logo
 
T
ax & Investment Planning Services


About our first TIPS office in Townsville at 62-66 Railway Avenue, Townsville.
 
About our second TIPS office at 56 - 58 Thuringowa Drive, KIRWAN, Townsville.

    UPDATES:
 These updates will be dated, [what else, but], and be in order with the latest at the top.

[20081231]
Favicon.ico links to Website Index pages:
  [Just click on any logo/favicon to be taken to that particular Web-site.]

  Image             FISH        us  uk  nz Au  Ca   In                       



Our LATEST TOPICS:

    Listed here  20090804_0947GMT
       http://CorruptJudgeBrendanButlerChiefMagistrateCaucusingPoliceFraudAim.info

         http://CorruptJudgeMarshallIrwinChiefMagistrateCaucusingPoliceFraudAim.info

        
http://IndiaStudentAustraliaVisaPRScamShonkRipOffRaceFraudPrisonDeport.info
     

    Listed here  20090724_1103GMT

          http://DangerousLiaisonCapriCorruptQueenslandPoliceArmedHoldUpFraudCMC.info

          http://FlowerHartMichaelMeadowsFraudWCOWhiteIndustriesCaboolturePark.info

      
   http://CrimeMafiaPoliceProsecutorHenriRantalaMagistrateEhrichStrofield.info

    Listed here  20090712
       http://WalterHarveyEhrichCorruptMagistratePoliceFraudArmedRobberyTheft.info

         http://ColinJStrofieldCorruptMagistratePoliceFraudArmedRobberyTheftQld.info

       http://StVincentDePaulFraudBullyingPeterMaherJerryMcAuliffeMareeFell.info

    Listed here  20090601

Australian Public Sector CLICK HERE  Anti-Corruption Conference 2009

 CLICK HERE - Home of Fraud, Rort & Sin
 & sponsored by the corrupt partnership of the corrupt partners of Qld's CMC,  NSW's ICAC & WA's CCC.

 Allstralian Parliament
Member for TARDIS CLICK HERE
CLICK HERE  Russell Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA



    Listed here  20090525

Daniel Morcombe  Photo Evidence Update:

Police GAG Witness &
Police threaten Witness 

http://DanielMorcombePhotoEvidenceUpdatePoliceGagThreatenWitness.info

Beware of
CRIME STOPPERS

 
It Assists Corrupt Police, Political Crime & Criminal Fraud

  http://BewareCrimeStoppersAssistCorruptPolicePoliticCrimeCriminalFraud.info

  It Assists Corrupt Police, Political Crime & Criminal Fraud

    Listed here  20090520

    HOT NEWS: HARD EVIDENCE:  Joe Hockey & FASCIST CRIMINAL congress

    Joe Hockey & NSW Liberals Supports Lisa Chikarovski's

        Sewer Language Internet Bullying & INCITING MURDER

       This sewer mouth espousing slut language Lisa Chikarovski  espousing the slut language does great harm to Joe Hockey.

    Listed here 20090509:

TIPS for TAX logo
Tax & Investment Planning Services

  1.   *     Analysis of the 21st Century World Recession-Global Financial Economic Crisis
  2.   *   Free Advice How to SURVIVE 21st Century World Recession & PROSPER
  3.   *     Free Advice How to FIND a JOB & MAKE MONEY finding It
  4.   *     Free Small Business Advisory Service
  5.  *      Free T.I.P.S. for Tax & Investment Planning Service
  6.  *      FREE study Learn How To Do Own Personal Financial Planning Advice

   
    Listed here 20090503:




linksforumworldrecession
Links to our FORUMS regarding the 21st Century World Recession, SURVIVING IT & PROSPERING.
  1. 21st Century World Recession
  2. Analysis of the 21st Century World Recession
  3. FULL detail of the Analysis of 21st Century World Recession
  4. How to SURVIVE the 21st Century World Recession, & PROSPER
  5. In detail: How to SURVIVE the 21st Century World Recession, & PROSPER.
  6. Looking for Work: Looking for a Job:
  7. How to FIND A JOB, & MAKE MONEY doing it!!
  8. FULL detail: How to FIND A JOB, & MAKE MONEY doing it!!
  9. FULL detail: How to FIND A JOB, & MAKE MONEY FINDING it, and REAL MONEY doing it!!
  10. FULL DETAIL: Looking for Work: Looking for a Job:
  11. Small Business Advisory FORUM
  12. Full Description, Small Business Advisory Forum.
I have addressed this way forward, depending upon one's predilection, based on one's past actions or inclinations: Income from working for an 'employer' or working in one's own business.

  1. Looking for Work: Looking for a Job: How to FIND A JOB, & MAKE MONEY doing it!!
  2. Small Business Advisory FORUM
global footer

Themes of  Websites
for the
HAIG   REPORT: Group of Websites:
[We expect, in time, to have all of the thousands of pages on the
HAIG   REPORT: group of websites accessible from this Menu of THEMES. Eventually, there will be approximately 15 themes, each with an average of 15 to 20 websites/domains/directories, with each website/domain having an average of 20 pages. This would equate to 15 x (15 to 20) x 20 = 4,500 to 6,000 pages. This menu of Themes will be included near the bottom of each page, in time. With one line of code, strategically placed, this Menu of Themes is now on thousands of pages. We are continually and progressively adding pages to this Menu of Themes of website Menus.]

Menu: HaigReport'sThemes or Categories of the the Topics of the HaigReport Group of Websites:

The LATEST ADDITIONS are added to the top:


See  All 62 Domain Names in the HaigReport Group

Now here are the THEMES:



  1. International: Corrupt Politics & Corrupt religion:


  2. About HaigReport Group of Websites including
    Vote One Russell Mathews:


  3. Russell Mathews [BCom BSc LLB & BA] Commentary additional to the rest of these Websites:


  4. Legal Rights, & BLACKLISTS of parasite residents & tenants in rental accommodation:


  5. RAMPANT POLICE CORRUPTION Exposed by HaigReport Websites; Publicize Your Complaint Here:


  6. Other public sector corruption Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  7. RELIGION Corruption Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  8. wankers & pony spankers Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  9. Corrupt JUDGES, COURTS, & TRIBUNALS Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  10. Corrupt LAWYERS Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  11. Corrupt POLITICANS Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  12. University of Qld Fraud & Corruption Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  13. Corruption at other universities; Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  14. Expose' of Other CORRUPTION, including TELSTRA, under influence of public sector parasites, as exposed by the HaigReport Group of Websites:


  15. Business Promoted by HaigReport Websites:


  16. Finance by HaigReport Websites:

This page is part of the Internet presence of

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
View list of SOME of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html


SEE WHAT I PLAN TO DO ABOUT IT!


Image
CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE