HAIG    REPORT:    GoTo [on this page] HaigReport's Menu Of Themes of Menus for our thousands of pages
TIPS for
Navigating HaigReport:  If you arrived at this page, referred from a Search Engine such as Google et al, your URL link will NOT have an #Anchor/Marker to take you to the relevant spot on this page.  In that case, we do recommend that you view our "Latest HaigReport Promotions" of recent additions to our websites, by Clicking Here.  It will open in a new Browser window. 

If
you Click Here, you will be taken, usually, to the specific Unique Content on this page, for which you were most likely seeking.  However, if you Click Here, you will be taken to the Top of the HaigReport Header, below on this page. 

However, if you have arrived at this page from another of our Website pages, your link will usually have an #Anchor, also called a marker, which will take you to the intended specific spot on the page where that marker is positioned.  In fact, it will probably take you there prior to your reading this.  Moving to that Anchor is the final step in the loading of this page.

 HAIG     REPORT:   Is now on  twitter  [from 2nd June, 2013]  link to us HERE on twitter     See our Twitter Strategy    

 HAIG    REPORT:  SEE: Russell Mathews' COMMENTARY:    Russell Mathews' [BCom BSc LLB & BA] current TOPICAL commentary on GOVERNMENT, politics & business     Press to READ       Press for MENU   

 HAIG    REPORT:    WANTED:
Healthy female "dog" to breed with Parson Russell Terrier, to produce ASSISTANCE DOGS.   Rochedale South QLD 4123
I wish to breed from my Parson Russell Terrier. He is a trained assistance dog. He has a wonderful nature. The breed of his mate could be varied or a cross; eg Parson Russell Terrier, Jack Russell Terrier, Beagle, Bull Terrier, Bull mastiff, Staffy, and/or Fox Terrier plus many others. She does not need to be "pedigreed". I am very protective of my dogs. She will become very valuable to me and become one of my assistance "dogs". If we can assist each other, please contact me on my contact form, including your email address and your landline phone number so I can phone you to discuss. 

Because I am disabled and have an LLB [so therefore understand the Law surrounding disabilities and assistance dogs] I am now branching out to providing Assistance dogs to disabled persons [even if disabled in only a minor way and so not even realizing it]. This is not a business proposition but rather just a very necessary service I can offer to the community.
Many people have a disability and do not realize their ailment or "problem" is by law, the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA], classified as a "disability". This is especially so for people getting on in years, and who have a dog, and are maybe moving to accommodation where they are told they cannot take their dog. In a majority of cases, those people cannot be legally forced to surrender their animal/dog.
I will be assisting those person who already have dogs, but are being forced, unlawfully, to dispose of them because maybe they are moving accommodation. I can train your existing dogs to be assistance dogs and provide the documentation as required by the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA]. I do not intend to charge for this, but just maybe cover some marginal costs.

    View the Latest    HAIG     REPORT Promotions:  in this Scrolling Window, or OPEN in new browser:     

 Click here  to Learn how your Personalized Alert Notice [IMMEDIATELY ABOVE] is prepared by our HAIG Unique Visitor Algorithm: [HUVA] or  Click here  to see your UNIQUE Personalized Alert Notice in a new Browser Window.


 Submission to District Court Mention 15th June, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church:


My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies. The HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies.

   It is Our legal, social and moral DUTY to EXPOSE CRIME, FRAUD & CORRUPTION plus Lying and Hypocrisy in Public Life, Including Judges & magistrates 
 

Fraud, Corruption & attempted  MURDER 
covered-up by Queensland police, EXPOSED 

header: Qld District Court coram Kerry O'Brien:

Qld District Court coram Kerry O'Brien: 
Australian Government Steals Disabled Old Man's home for The University of Queensland to punish Disabled Old Man for being DISABLED & wants Court's sanction.

commonheader.php

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.  
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      EMAIL us anytime:  Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay. 

considerevidence.php

Consider the evidence! Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay.  

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Submission to District Court Mention 15th June, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church

See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for Chief Justice Paul deJersey _v_ Court of Appeal President Margaret McMurdo; Judicial War Supreme Court of Qld

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for Corrupt Qld Judiciary: Favours Untouchable Banks FRAUD; What is Chief Justice of Supreme Court of Qld, Paul deJersey doing?

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for Woolworths/BigW: The Experience by a disabled customer, of Woolworth's BULLYING & BigW's MISLEADING & DECEPTIVE CONDUCT

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Submission to District Court Mention 15th June, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church

 Content: Submission to District Court Mention 15th June, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
included20120615SubmissionDistrictCourtMention.php G'day DCJ handling my matter of the purported Section 20B Crimes Act 1914 referral.

[The relevant mention is on the morning of the 15th June, 2012.  I shall forward the final version of this as an HTML email [and as a pdf attachment], to the Court Registry, Shane Hunter of the CDPP [Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions] and to the Commonwealth Attorney General Nicola Roxon, on the evening of 14th June, 2012.  I intend that this will bite back hard at the parasites who have chosen to exploit me, a Disabled Old Man, and all the many organs of Government both Queensland and Australian. that have perpetuated the fraud by Armed Robbery that has been perpetrated against me.  This matter of the 20B referral is piggy-backing upon the four charges that is one more instance of perpetuation, and so is yet again another instance of perpetuation of the fraud and Exploitation of a Disabled Old Man.] 

I require that this, my submission and 'appearance' in court for this mention, be included On the Record.  I am not in court today due to my disability.  This is my statement to the court on this occasion of this mention. It will be Disability Discrimination if that inclusion does not occur. While the Court has Judicial Immunity, Shane Hunter and the CDPP are part of the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, as is Attorney General, Nicola Roxon, and all are subject to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol.  As Shane Hunter and the CDPP have attempted to use, in the past,  the defence disqualified by the Nuremberg Nazi trials, where that defence was used by the Nazis in Nuremberg to excuse the Nazi Holocaust; of not being able to think for themselves [public servants(?)], but having acted as automatons, they, Shane Hunter and all Members of the Executive of the Government of Australia,  should refuse to continue in this hearing/mention, if I am about to suffer Disability Discrimination.  [They should have refused to continue in the all previous hearings/mentions when I was being denied my Human Rights by virtue of my disabilities.]


  1.  that it does not have jurisdiction regarding this purported per Sec20B Crimes Act 1914 referral, because long before the time when this purported referral was made, the committal hearing coram Kluck M. had become a nullity due to the denial to me of Due Process, in that I was denied a Fair Hearing as the necessary Reasonable Special Measures needed to accommodate my Special Needs resulting from my brain damage and other disabilities were not accommodated.  Neither KluckM. nor Shane Hunter, not  the CDPP should have participated when  that deficeincy of accommodation of Special Needs persisted. Below in this submission, to argue these matters, I refer to sections of the  transcript coram Kluck.
  2. that these charges should be dismissed immediately.  These charges are misconceived.   As Public Media with an assumed   DUTY to EXPOSE CRIME, FRAUD & CORRUPTION plus to expose Lying and Hypocrisy in Public Life,  these four journals have Qualified Privilege.  All journalists, producers and workers on such also have that Qualified Privilege.  If I had uploaded the subject content using any broadband, I too would have the immunity form charges resulting from that Qualified Privilege.  As in the case of mis-reporting of the Dick possible electoral fraud, that can be excused such that Privilege/Immunity still applies if appropriate checking of its accuracy had been performed.   In that respect, the actions of ex Queesland copper now Federal; Member Peter Dutton and the reported lie by his office manager Jodie Crawford are highly relevant. 
  3. http://HaigReport.com/images/20080808EmailJodieCrawfordPeterDuttonReJulieMareeDickJulieMareeMellifontTerenceJosephMellifontEd.jpg
  4.  The Qld Police reported that Jodie Crawford had not sent an email attributed to her, but the police have not bothered to check its authenticiry with the administrator of the Commonwealth Government [Parliament House] Server from which it was sent.  Since that would have been a simple task, that it was not done suggests Improper Motives on the part of the Qld Police and Shane Hunter and the CDPP
  5. http://HaigReport.com/images/20090909PoliceBriefReJodieCrawford0003_cr01_tnJodieCrawfordDeniedSendingActualEmail.jpg
Did the Qld Police bother to obtain a copy of that supposed email sent by Jodie Crawford? 
The facts of the matter are that ex-cop Peter Dutton thought he would play me for a fool.

This is my submission [it will be sent, as an HTML email so that the hyperlinks will be 'live', [and as a pdf attachment], to the Court Registry and Shane Hunter of the CDPP [Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions] ], and to the Commonwealth Attorney General Nicola Roxon,  [and publication at   http://haigreport.com/DistrictCourtKerryOBrien/20120615SubmissionDistrictCourtMentionQldAustralianGovernmentEXPLOITATIONDisabledOldManUniversityQldChiefJusticePauldeJerseyBrisbaneDioceseAnglicanChurch.php#Content20120615SubmissionDistrictCourtMentionQldAustralianGovernmentEXPLOITATIONDisabledOldManUniversityQldChiefJusticePauldeJerseyBrisbaneDioceseAnglicanChurch ].   This submission is MY written appearance in court, as a reasonable adjustment to accommodate the special neeed, The District Court of Queensland, on the 15th June, 2012, in Brisbane is listed to hold the ultra vires mention on the ultra vires purported referral per Section 20B, Crimes Act 1914, of my fitness to stand trial, for purportedly using a carriage service  ie broadband, to upload details of the Queensland police Armed Robbers.and Armed Robbery of a Disabled Old Man.

As there is substantial content to be included in this statement/submission to the District Court Mention on  15th June, 2012, that will take time, so this web page will be continually upgraded as the Submission approaches its final form for the Mention.

This page will be promoted as the Top Panel on thousands of impression, per day, of webpages in the interval up to the time of this Mention, and many more hundreds of thousands subsequently, as it will remains online.  

[It would be interesting to see how many extra people attend this mention to see just what happens in the "public arena"; as to how the District Court treats disabled persons.  Shane Hunter will stand and announce his appearance.  I suspect that many lawyers will be interested to see how the Court handles this.]

This is shaping up to be a major SCANDAL, the Crime of the Century with International ramifications.  The Queensland Government, now supported by the Australian Government, [and Australia is not supposed to be a banana republic, third world country], has used its armed police force, not just the two police officers involved in the actual presence at the Armed Robbery, but also the Senior Queensland police officers involved, to rob a Disabled Old Man of his home, that he beneficially owned, for the joint use by the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane, of which the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Paul de Jersey  is "Chancellor", and the Qld Government University, The University of Queensland orchestrated by the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  The Senior Police officers involved [on the evidence under oath of one of the two police officers involved in the actual Armed Invasion and Break and Enter while armed and in Company, Henri Elias Rantala [ who then actually illegally arrested the Disabled Old Man so as to enable the Armed  Robbery to progress]], included Corrupt Cop and Armed Robber Henri Elias Rantala Implicated Superintendent Dale Pointon.

I understand that DCJA O'Brien [KJOB] has returned from the Supreme Court.  KJOB has previously expressed [on 22nd November,  2011], a desire to retain control of matters associated with me, so I am guessing that this matter may be coram KJOB "today".  [Because of my disability,  - and these matters are wasting so much of my time, of which I have less usable available, [due to my disability such that at times, I can do little other than "autopilot" or "routine" activities,] from which I can achieve even less, [as due to my disabilities, I can be less productive in any duration, I have started writing this on Friday, 8th June, 2012.]

I suggest and request that if KJOB is holding this court today, that he disqualify himself from this matter.  KJOB has previously commented in relation to the provision of "Special Measure" in the Magistrates Court in this matter.

I have previously made such a request and I renew that on the same grounds plus more as now detailed.  In his decision on 21st July, 2011,  re my Sec222 Justices Act appeal, KJOB could not help but show his real colours when he stated;

"[8] The record of proceedings below indicates that the Court made every effort to
accommodate the appellant's so called "special needs" though not, it seems, to the
appellant's satisfaction. "

I draw attention to his language.  "every effort"  and "so called"   That is clearly denigrating to me.  Why should I be expected to accept this outrage?   It is a clear objective "matter of fact" and not a matter of law.  As well, "Special Needs" is a descriptive term used formally.  KJOB's use of quotation marks suggest further derision of me.

Much expert evidence can be called as to whether sufficient "reasonable measures" had been adopted to ensure that my Special; Needs caused by my weaknesses resulting from my Disabilities had in fact been accommodated to ensure I received Due Process of a Fair Hearing.    I should correct KJOB that it is not a matter of my satisfaction but my assessment of whether the Law will be satisfied, and that is not the "law" as according to KJOB.  We may see in time whether the UN's Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Geneva is of the same view as KJOB.   That Committee already has jurisdiction as the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [OP] was triggered because the Executive of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia is subject to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD] as that Executive acceded to the OP on  21st August, 2009 and because of the attendance of Shane Hunter of the CDPP [Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions] in court and his participation therein, while my Rights per the CRPD were torn asunder and shredded.  

As further evidence that KJOB is biased against and would act on that bias in the future is that KJOB has also stated on the record that Kluck M. had many provision by which he could have enforced my appearance in the magistrates court committal.  This suggests that KJOB would have done that.  That shows more propensity to be biased against me, at least, in that the reason the Kluck M. did not use measures available to him to force my appearance, was that Kluck M. realized he had denied me a fair hearing and hence the matter before him was then a nullity, a farce, and that to take precipitous action against me was exacerbating his wrong by issuing orders without due legal cause.  All that information/evidence was available to KJOB but KJOB decided to ignore it, and in fact, act contrary to it.  That propensity, is in accord with support for the perpetrators of the SCANDAL that is set to become the Crime of the Century in Australia by many members of the Queensland executive Government and judiciary including Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich [subsequently his conduct was termed Topsy-Turvy by Qld Court of Appeal, and he was called "Wally" by his corrupt police mates.] 

Because of my brain damage disability, to force me to appear in court, would be gross disability Discrimination when I can better represent myself in this way.   In  court, I would be a "Fish out of Water" because of my brain damage disability.

I have attempted to rehabilitate myself with practice but that practice at expression has been far more in writing than verbally, to account for my concentration and fatigue predilection weaknesses resulting from my injuries caused disabilities.   Te require me to express myself verbally, in real time is to target my disability.

My computer, the Internet, websites and publications with Qualified Privilege are my major Disability Aids.  I have adapted these  to best cope with my disability.  


I have had to take the time to fully apprise this court, the District Court, of these matters, which use of time has taken me from performing more of the work on completing an application to the Supreme Court of Queensland.

I am in the process of making application to the Supreme Court of Queensland. The application will include as respondents, Shane Hunter, Anthony Gett, both of the CDPP, the CDPP itself and the Cth Attorney General Nicola Rocks-Off, pursuant to the Cth Judiciary Act 1903, Sec 39B, (1C)(d) regarding a matter in which I am [or were if Hunter decides to discontinue - in the most recent previous Mention in this matter, the Presiding Judge, His Honour Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJsuggested to Shane Hunter that it may be inappropriate to continue if the order had not been made on a proper basis] the defendant in the prosecution and seeking a writ of mandamus or prohibition or an injunction against an officer or officers of the Commonwealth in relation to a related criminal justice process decision.  The purpose of that application will include being granted injunctions against the Commonwealth Officers, not to continue to breach my rights as a Disabled Person pursuant to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. I will be seeking Declarations as regards previous discrimination and denial of due process.  I will also be seeking declarations as the entry to my property   Purposes may also included Orders of the nature of Writs of Prohibition  against this court, the District Court in relation to this purported referral, against the Magistrates Court  and injunctions against Qld Police Commissioner and the QPS. The grounds, in relation to members of the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, will include breaches of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Additionally, I shall seek the Equitable Remedy of Declarations of the various steps  regarding the Armed Robbery by Rantala et al, including the Brisbane City Council, and the errors of law by the Crime and Misconduct CommissionRobert Walker, Legal Services Commission, John Briton, Susan Barker, the Qld Information Commissioner.

Another extremely dumb or corrupt Queensland Government Commissioner, is John Briton, Legal Services Commissioner.  He committed his corruption in writing dated 8th November, 2005:.   His "view" is wrong as would be known by high school students in legal studies.  See:  the Correct Legal PrincipleA Regulation or a section of a regulation  cannot over-ride a right in a statute or a common law right.    That he, and  so many others would put their corruption in writing indicates his confidence, and the confidence of so many others, in the complete widespread corruption in Queensland and Australia.

See in his letter the paragraph:
You are also of the view that Mr Tolton's advice is incorrect as he has misinterpreted sections 200 and 209 of the Regulation and failed to examine appropriate case law in the area. I have examined the relevant sections of the Health Regulation 1996 and the cases referred to your complaint. I am of the view that Mr Tolton's advice was correct and that the BCC is not required to seek permission from a Court before entering the premises. Section 200 provides a statutory right to the BCC to enter a place after it has issued a notice pursuant to section 209 if that notice has not been complied with.

It is interesting to compare the way two different Corrupt Qld Commissioners express the same corruption.  Compare John Briton's with that written by Robert Walker now Commissioner, Body Corporate & Community Management but previously of the Qld Crime and Misconduct Commission and his letter dated 10th April, 2006. I suggest that Robert Walker's style is his admission that he knows it is false, bogus and corrupt.  When all this eventually 'hits the fan', and it will, each of the many corrupt individuals will want everyone to believe that their mistake of law was a genuine mistake.

In response to my complaint to the Crime and Misconduct Commission, this letter dated 10th April, 2006 was sent to me. His rational is false.  It is basic law of  Statute v Regulation   A Regulation or a section of a regulation  cannot over-ride a right in a statute or a common law right.    The Author of this, Robert Walker is clearly corrupt.  He has apparently been rewarded for his corruption by his elevation/promotion to Commissioner, Body Corporate & Community Management.   Clearly, the Body Corporate & Community Management Commission [BCCM] is part of the extensive corruption of bribery and payola in Queensland.

Queensland's "Assistant" Information Commissioner, Susan Barker, [ie Sue Barker; in Russian language 'subarka' - in latin script rather than Cyrillic - means DOG; - I wonder how appropriate?] the cloth eared evil incompetent public sector parasite stated in her letter dated 23rd May, 2006, an error apparent to a high schools student of legal studies, that a regulation [Section 200] [since revoked], composed by public sector parasites and rubber stamped in a Government Gazette,  could over-ride the rights in a Statute, approved by a majority in the democratically elected parliament;. Section 160 Health Act 1937.  [The "Entry" provisions were later amended to section 144 whereby the Council could apply for a warrant from a Magistrate, ex parte.] However, at the time of the Armed Robbery, to enter, without my permission, the Brisbane City Council, and anyone entering for them were required to obtain a Mandatory Court Order after giving me a Right to be Heard [Natural Justice] in the court.  See Sub Sec (ii)Section 160 Health Act 1937.
In fact, the office of the Information Commissioner [OIC] has been an oft repeated source of coverup of the Crime of Armed Robbery by the Queensland government and the Brisbane City Council and the crime of "Land Fraud" by Douglas Porter ex-Registrar of The University of Queensland In time we will detail here, at least THREE independent instances by the Information Commissioner of Queensland.

The  CDPP are on record of assuming the validity of the excuse for the Nazi Holocaust, by the Nazis at Nuremberg, that they were just following orders, the decisions of others and could not think for themselves.   In this case, the circumstances of the denial of accommodation of my special needs by means of Reasonable Adjustments, in the proceeding that is/was, in the committal hearing, coram Magistrate Kluck, is in parallel to the Nazi Holocaust excuse as Hunter reckons he could not think for himself nor gain the benefit of the thinking of his superiors in CDPP to know to not participate in a proceeding where my Special Needs caused by my disabilities were not being accommodated as is required by Shane Hunter and the CDPP.

At the most recent previous Mention in this matter, with His Honour Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ presiding, Shane Hunter stated in reference to me, "He claims to be disabled."  That begs the Question, "Does Shane Hunter have evidence to suggest that I am not disabled?"  "Does Shane Hunter dispute that I am disabled?"  He has seen reports on the Internet, in the Public Domain that I am disabled.  There are such  documents before the committal hearing now truncated.  There are also medical reports before he committal  hearing regarding my disabilities.   Does he dispute all the evidence.  Clearly, Shane Hunter was just trying to be a disability discriminating smart arse.  Clearly, I have claimed my diusability as I am disabled.   Hunter's advice is effectively saying:  "Well, I don't believe you."  

Hunter's being subject to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, means he cannot be advertorial when it comes to my disability, such that he is taking advantage of my disability to win his case.  I contend that Hunter's statement "He claims to be disabled." is Disability Discrimination in that he is belittling my disabilities.  I am entitled to adapt in all ways possible to cope with my disability; to alleviate the effects of my disabilities.

The Supreme Court will presume, I imagine, that CDPP are not automatons.  I will suggest that the supreme court should not presume that they are automatons, who cannot think for themselves

I shall remind the Supreme Court that the CDPP and the Cth Attorney General Nicola Rocks-Off,  are not automatons but have free will and free determination, and that the Supreme Court of Qld should presume that Hunter, Gett et al can think for yourselves.  Your Honour can consider the substance of "orders". That excuse was seen for what it was when the Nazis at Nuremberg used it.

Do Shane Hunter, Anthony Gett, the CDPP and the Cth Attorney General Nicola Rocks-Off, support the Nazi Holocaust, or just aspects of it, or do they just support the Nazi view that produced the Nazi Holocaust?  There is a strong parallel in logic with their action in this case: using the excuse of "following the decision of others" to deny Human Rights.

Far be it for me to ask this court for anything.  I think that in the circumstance of this foreshadowed application to the Supreme Court, this court may not wish to be infringing the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Queensland.  This court and others may wish that I do not avail myself of the deliberations of the Supreme Court, but this court cannot stop me by law, and were it to take any step to increase the difficulty for me to proceed to the Supreme Court as indicated, given that I am disabled, I think the Supreme Court, and its superior tribunals may take a less than wholesome view of such.  In the circumstance, I suggest that the District Court, in this matter should simply adjourn this matter.  If this court makes any other  order I shall quickly have my application to the Supreme Court Registry.  With my being a Concession Card Holder it will cost me $100.   I can post with details of my payment method.   The format will be an Application with Affidavit.

KJOB has also stated on the record that Kluck M. had many provision by which he could have enforced my appearance.  This suggests that KJOB would have done that.  That shows more propensity to be biased against me, at least, in that the reason the Kluck M. did not use measures available to him to force my appearance, was that Kluck M. realized he had denied me a fair hearing and hence the matter before him was then a nullity, a farce, and that to take precipitous action against me was exacerbating his wrong by issuing orders without due legal cause. 

If perchance, the Chief DCJ Wolfe is holding this court, I also require that she should disqualify herself, for the reasons of which she is well aware, relating to her unprofessional conduct coram Spender in the Federal Court circa 1992 when she was well aware of the evidence which made the decision which was against my interests, void ab initio but chose to ignore that imperative.  This is in addition to her caucussing with Spender in his chambers when I was exluded prior to this hearing

Please remember that if you think my language is intemperate, to consider what the Government and Judicial parasites have done and are continuing to do to me.  Clearly,all  who have acted to cheat me, thought  that the Queensland and  now Australian  Corruption would permit their being able to cheat me with impunity. 
 
I shall have the proof publicly recognized that this prosecution was born out of base greed and government corruption.  It should never have happened.  It is police corruption beccuse they did the Armed Robbery.  Because of  the many instances of cover-up, the corruption goes much higher.  The relevant questions are, who acted, who knew, who benefited and who was in charge?

If anyone or any court attempts to suppress this statement/submission, it is in the Public Domain.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Nature of Disability:

\I have a number of disabilities. I have many supporting documents. I shall attempt to collate them into relevant groups.


My disabilities are:


Brain damage and some palsy;


Obstructive Sleep Apnoea;


writing disability; hyper extended thumb;


lifting and carrying disability – bilateral long bicep tenosynovitis.


Vision disability – glaucoma, cataracts and 4th nerve palsy


I have substantial brain damage from a number of head injuries and related matters. I was diagnozed on 7th February, 2012 with 4th nerve palsy, most certainly caused by brain trauma, but do not yet have that documented. I was diagnosed with glaucoma and cataracts [both eyes] in 2011.

[I attach an MRI of my skull at

20051025MRI_negativecorrectorientfacingskull.JPG ]

I have had Craniosynostosis [premature closure of plates in my skull – so giving me a severely mis-shaped skull] all my life. [Additionally, as a child I had severe headaches which our family GP diagnosed, so I was advised, as migraines, but that I would grow out of them, Now, as my head is lopsided substantially, I have to unconsciously hold my head at an angle so the centre of gravity of my lopsided skull is immediately above the pivot point of my spine. This has caused me to have neck problems and pain.] I have suffered bullying all my life. Thankfully, I was well above average intelligence. Maths was my forte and I believed my future was sound based on my maths ability.

The medical report on that MRI is attached at

20051025MRI_ScanHeadReport.JPG


You will note that the all deviations from the norm in that report downplay the extent; as in “slightly asymmetric” and “slight … “generalized widening”. Clearly, all variations are significant and substantial as is the asymmetry.


I refer you to Dr Bennett's report on an earlier CT Scan report.

20050729DrBennettReCATscan_tn.jpg

and Dr Bennett's report of a number of head injuries suffered by me, at

19980331DrJWBennettListingHeadInjuriesFourSeparateEpisodes1967To1998AustudyDelDoB.jpg /.


At age about 15, I now realize, I began to develop undiagnosed Obstructive Sleep Apnoea [OSA]. At age 17 on 25th November, 1967 I was thrown from a horse and sustained concussion. I was hospitalised for 14 days. During that time, my weight increased by 13 kg so exacerbating my undiagnosed OSA.


That history of head injury is best detailed in the reports of Dr Brian E Hazell at


19990730DrHazellsReport.PDF &

20051005DrHazellReportColour.pdf


See the report from Dr Ian Brown re my OSA;

20060403reOSADrIanBrownreduced.jpg /.


I did not appear to recover from my concussion. My OSA was still undiagnosed but I was misdiagnosed with schizophrenia, and for three years I was mistreated with psycho drugs and electro-convulsive therapy [ECT] until another psychiatrist advised I was not schizophrenic. He took me off all drugs, and I improved somewhat from there but my OSA was still not diagnosed, That was mid 1971. [My OSA was not finally confirmed until a sleep study in 2003, after I had “diagnosed” it myself about a year earlier and demanded the sleep study to confirm it. I bought a CPAP machine but I could not use it as I had a phobia about putting anything over my face. I believe the cause is that I have woken up at night out of breath having stopped breathing. From about 2006 I began to improve a little more, by losing weight and sleeping on my side. I find now I am better able to monitor my concentration ability, as for short bursts each day, usually in the morning, I find I can think very well, but sometimes I have a bright idea and think of what a great idea it was, but then cannot remember what the idea was. Sometimes I later remember. ]

At that time in 1971, I did not feel recovered but reasoned that I may never recover and that that was the best I was going to ever be so decided I had to do the best I could with what I had. My major difficulties then were poor concentration and fatigue. I strived to achieve.

Prior to my injury I had been a “maths genius”. [Even in the last two decades, prior to my OSA being diagnosed and confirmed, and with my brain damage, my IQ had twice been calculated at about 145.] Still, I find it difficult to concentrate and I forget things regularly, including what I am thinking about at the time.

Another important disability I have is a hyper-extended right thumb giving me a writing disability as I can barely hold a pen such that I could guide it well enough to write legibly. Trying to write is also painful. My computer is very much my disability aid for both my memory and concentration problems and my writing disability.

Less significant to these matters but still causing me difficulties and giving me concern is bilateral long bicep tenosynovitis from which I suffer. This is a lifting and carrying disability for which I use a converted shopping trolley/cart to assist me. The pain in my upper arms and neck is with me daily. That disability is documented on the attached: 20100419Print20060614PaulFienReArmBilateralLongBicepsTenosynovitis_cr01.pdf

I have been disabled with brain damage from at least November, 1967. Please view all the documents and Reports attached. I shall list the documents by category of document. I have been subjected to Disability Discrimination since at least 1971 when I was employed as a clerk in the Queensland Government Railways [QGR]. In 1974, I was set up on trumped up charges and sacked by QGR. Incidents of discrimination by Queensland Government, [Qld Police] and parts of the executive of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, specifically the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [HREOC] in 1989 to 1992 continued. I contend that this has been one systemic unit or entity of disability discrimination, attack, abuse and exploitation.


I have always strived to better myself and be self reliant. From 1975 -78 I attended University and gained a BCom, without advising of my brain damage, so as not to suffer discrimination. I tried to run my own business with family financial support, but was repeatedly targeted and ripped off. Telecom, the Telecommunication Arm of the Commonwealth of Australia, ruined my business in 1986 in Townsville, by deliberate acts of sabotage by one or more individuals in Telecom. In 1994 they, Telecom, paid me just over $17,000 after lying and cheating me as to compensation for the fault for which they admitted full responsibility. By this time, my business was ruined and I was bankrupt.


I was earning a bare income as an accountant and Tax Agent when the Tax Agents' Board, of the Commonwealth of Australia, at the behest of HREOC decided to ruin my earning ability. I was also bankrupted, due to the effects of Telecom, including in 1886 promising to fully compensate me.


I was forced to go on the Disability Support Pension administered by Centrelink for the Commonwealth of Australia.


In 1991, I began part-time study at The University of Queensland, [UQ] in Mathematics. Because I was repeatedly derided, I wished to gain a PhD. UQ is a Queensland Government University.


I moved into a house I owned as beneficiary of a Constructive Trust in February, 1994.

See the attached

20050225AndrewRouyanianReConstructiveTrustLetterToClient250205.pdf

This house was within 100 yards of UQ in St Lucia, a suburb of Brisbane, Queensland.


I suffered repeated episodes of Disability Discrimination by UQ, encouraged by the Registrar Douglas Porter.

See:

20041215DouglasPorterPromiseExternalLegalOpinion001.jpg


St Johns College Council [SJCC] runs St Johns College [SJC] on the St Lucia Campus of UQ. SJCC is a joint body between UQ and the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane [CSDB] also known as the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC]. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Paul de Jersey was made Chancellor of the CSDB shortly after his becoming Chief Justice. He has been Chancellor at all relevant times in this matter.


Douglas Porter, the then UQ Registrar, and UQ Registrar at all relevant times, was secretly, the Chair and UQ representative on SJCC. Douglas Porter was behind most of the Disability Discrimination I suffered at UQ. He could have stopped it at any time, but instead he stoked it.


The house adjoining mine was owned by the CSDB and operated as an Annex to SJC, under the control of SJCC. Soon after the year 2000, SJCC under the chairmanship of Douglas Porter, sought to secretly acquire my home for use as another annex to SJC, under the control of SJCC chaired by UQ Registrar Douglas Porter.

Clearly, there was a plan. I began being the brunt of a continuous stream of complaints from next door operated as the SJC annex. I also was the target of much disability discrimination from UQ always condoned by Douglas Porter.


The Brisbane City Council, [BCC], an authority of the Queensland Government [QG] was seconded to implement the plan to separate me from my beneficially owned home. An important prelude to the operation of my home as an annex of SJC was that the yard was cleared of all of my possessions.


This was orchestrated under the Qld Health Act 1937.


The plan included describing me as a mere tenant. The BCC were required by the plan to prepare a report indicating that I was a terrible tenant and so should be legally evicted.


By Sec 160 of the Health Act 1937, as it then stood, [on the 29th November, 2004], the BCC were required to have a court order after I had been given Natural Justice of a Right to be Heard, to permit their entry to my property where I had exclusive possession.


I now reproduce Sec 160 Health Act 1937 (Qld) as was current as at 29th November, 2004.



 Health Act 1937: Section160 Entry
(1) The chief executive, the chief health officer, the local government and an officer of the department or local government may enter from time to time into and upon any house or premises for the purpose of examining as to the existence of any nuisance thereon or whether any of the provisions of this Act are being contravened, or of executing any work or making any inspection authorized to be executed or made under the provisions of this Act or any order, or local law, or making any inquiry under the provisions of this Act, or generally for the purpose of enforcing the provisions of this Act or any order, or local law, at any time between the hours of 9a.m. and 6p.m. of any day, or in the case of a business then at any hour when such business is in progress or is usually carried on.

(2) If such admission to any house or premises is refused, any justice, on complaint thereof by any such officer (made after reasonable notice in writing of the intention to make it has been given to the occupier), may, by order under the justice’s hand, require the occupier to admit such officer into the house or premises; and if no occupier can be found the justice may, on proof of that fact, by order under the justice’s hand authorise any such officer to enter such house or premises.

[The Health Act 1937 was later amended so that the entry requirements were then in sec 144 and was merely a warrant issued by a magistrate ex-parte.]


The BCC composed a ruse or artifice, based upon a barristers 'opinion'

[See:

20041019WayneJohnToltonOpinoni.PDF      

[The viewer of that "barrister's opinion" will notice that  substantial text has been redacted from that document.   That has been done unlawfully.  Either Paul Wesener of the Brisbane City Council or the Information Commissioner is liable for that unlawful deletion of subatantive legal detail.  The then current Freedom of information Act required that  when Client Privilege has been waived, as it had been in this case and this was the reason that this much was released, then the identical situation that applies in court when Client Privilege aka Legal Profession Privilege is waived, will apply.  That means the whole document should be produced for inspection.  It was not, as can be seen.  We will eventually see this document.  When we do the culpability of both the Information Commissioner and the Brisbane City Council will be clear.  The part deleted will most assuredly be substantive law.   I suggest that that section was deleted to pervert the course of justice.]]

whereby they believed they could later base an argument, to appear to give them the right to force entry to my property. [However, in the letter next mentioned, they waived Client Privilege.] On the 29th November, 2004, the BCC [Brisbane City Council] in company with two armed Qld police officers, Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony forced entry to my property and over a three day period, cleared and stole all my possessions in my yard and some inside my house. That was a Monday. The previous Friday I received the letter attached with the file names 20041125BCCentrynotice_cr01.jpg and 20041125BCCentrynotice.pdf


These are all the necessary elements of the offence of Armed Robbery, break and entry, with violence and in company.


The police officer Henri Elias Rantala arrested me at that time on bogus charges. Those charges were dismissed by the Qld Court of Appeal. See

20100730CourtOfAppealDecisionEvilEgregiousEhrichQCA196-RvMathews.pdf

noting in particular the comments included by the President of the Court of Appeal McMurdo P. regarding Armed Robbery and Perverting the Course of Justice.


Then began a series of episodes aimed at concealing and covering up the armed robbery.


The court appearance for that arrest occurred on on 1st June, 2005.


The transcript is attached as

20050601MagistrateCourtTranscriptFraudWalterHarveyEhrichJohnPedenPrasleyVPraser0000_tn.pdf


I had subpoenaed witnesses and documents which would have shown that that there had been an armed robbery. Unbeknown to me at that time, the trustees, of MY trust, had already signed the transfer documents for my home. See attached:


TransferOf254HawkenDriveToBrisbaneAnglicanSynod1245024172_0_0.pdf


On that occasion, magistrate Ehrich came into court about half an hour late. It was the first hearing for the day. I suspect he had been 'phoned with the instruction to “get rid of it”, as he stated.


I ensured he knew that he had made a huge mistake. On 1st December, 2008,Magistrate Ehrich purported to “revoke” his decision

see:

SANY0202WalterHarveyEhrichJohnPedenMsVPraserBrisbaneCityLegalPractice_cr_cr_tn673x600.jpg

and on the 17th December, 2008, Ehrich M. held a short farcical “procedure” and that transcript is the attached;

20081217MagistrateCourtTranscriptFraudFarceWalterHarveyEhrichPoliceSgtCox.pdf


Aware that these police officers Rantala and Antony had committed an Armed Robbery, I advised the Queensland Police. As I am disabled I use email as my main means of communication.

See:

20070426DrMoyleReSpecialNeedsAssessmentEmailExpediteCommunicationsDerailmentThinkingFaceToFaceTelephone_cr01_tn451x640.jpg

Queensland Police blocked my email communications for surreptitious reasons.

See:

20100917WillCocksAHRC_QldPoliceQPS_ResponseOf20100907.pdf


This timeline will show conclusively, the extent of the corruption in Queensland.   I detail here one major criminal plot with many sub-plots, perpetrated mainly by the Queensland Government and Queensland Government Authorities, Commissions and departments.   The Queensland Police were prominent  in committing an Armed Robbery, a major part of this criminal plot.  Senior Police including Superintendent Dale Pointon are ACCESSORIES  after the fact to the Armed Robbery and accessories to the OTHER crimes of Accessories after the fact to the many OTHER crimes since to "cover-up"/conceal the litany of CRIMINALITY. 

I know the law, as I have a Law Degree.   The criminals cannot make the Irrefutable conclusive evidence of crimes against me disappear, as much as they may continue to refuse to recognize the evidence, and refuse to consider it.   Hence, I will not give up until I have all these criminals penalized, my property returned to me, all wrongs against me corrected and many fold punitive damages awarded to me.

I have the advantage of not being
stuffed around by corrupt lawyers, who have a paramount "duty" to the court.  I KNOW my rights and I DEMAND my rights.  

Corrupt Cop Henri Rantala,[in court, under Oath],Implicates Superintendent Dale Pointon in the CRIMINAL PLOT.

This now is a Statement by Corrupt Cop Henri Elias Rantala who was the lead cop committing the ARMED ROBBERY.  See the hyperlink where Rantala admitted to this in court under oath, confirming this.


I quote here from

20100628_Day3_KluckTranscriptMagistratesCourtCommittalCarriageService.pdf

DEFENDANT: And you said, "I'd been contacted by Superintendent Pointon". Would that be Dale Pointon?   That - that's correct.


Okay?   The - the only part of that paragraph that's incorrect is, it should read 2007 not 2006.


Okay. But you did say 2006 at the time, did you?   Well, I - that's a typographical error because it should be 2007 and not 2006.


Okay?   And similarly, in the same vein is, under paragraph 29 where it says, "8 January 2006", that's "8 January 2007".


Okay. So, you've been alerted to that, have you?   Well, I've had a read of a report that I prepared at the time regarding that matter and the - the content of that report - the report was dated in 2007 and I noticed in the content of the report that the date was 2006 and that was - that as incorrect.


I see?   So, I have a - still have a copy of that report that I prepared at the time.


Okay. So, that's - so, when you prepared this your recollection wasn't too good?   No. It was based on some of the content contained in that report and then I - in hindsight I had a look at the - the date on that report and then realised that there was a date error on the content of that     


Okay?        in terms of your - date.


Okay. Now, in this evidence, in your statement, you've said that you were contacted by Dale Pointon, officers from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch and State Crime Operations Command?   Yes.


Is that true?   Yes.


What are their names?


MR HUNTER: Well, how is this relevant?


BENCH: Relevance, Mr Mathews?


DEFENDANT: Well, I mean, it's easy enough to say it's happened but I mean, if the people aren't, you know, they aren't actual     


What's the context of the     


DEFENDANT: The offensive material has been subsequently been maintained on the internet since that time until the present day. I have been contacted by Superintendent Pointon, officers from the Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch and State Crime Operations Command relative - relatives all asking questions about material from 2006 - which is now seven - until the present day.


BENCH: So, what do you want to know?


DEFENDANT: I want to know the names of the people from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch and State Crime Operations.


BENCH: Do you know who they are?   I have committed them to memory because what has happened is that they made phone calls to me, indicated where they were from and now I'm - I remember more where they're from as opposed to who specifically they are. And they had - I had conversations with them about this particular topic and they wanted to know a bit of a background. As a result, subsequent to that, I had sent an email to my District Officer, that's Superintendent Pointon, about this particular topic. The defendant has a copy of the email attached to his web site so, that particular point is not unknown to him, but I don't know, because I made no records anywhere, of the particular names of these individuals that have contacted me.


DEFENDANT: Well, I beg our pardon, that - now, you say an email or something or other on a web site?   Yes.


What is that email? Can we - is it - is it on the records before the Court?   I don't know. I've found it on the internet attached to one of your web pages and it's my communication with myself and the Superintendent Pointon.


A web page attributed to me you say?   Yes.


And what does this - and what does it - what does it - what's the substance of this?   It's - it's pretty much - it's a pdf copy of the email I sent to my superintendent. He wanted - he wanted an indication of what the background was. I indicated that - and if I had any particular issues with it. And I indicated specifically the number of sections that had contacted me about this particular issue and that it was of substantial annoyance to me. That is the email that I communicated to - with my superintendent regarding this matter. You, for some reason, or someone has obtained a copy of this email document, made a pdf document out of it and attached it to the web site because it can be freely accessed from the internet.



"The offensive material has been subsequently been maintained on the internet since that time until the present day. I have been contacted by Superintendent Pointon, Officers from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, State Crime Operations Command, relatives all asking question about the material from 2006 until the present day."

[It has been transcribed .]
"The offensive material has been subsequently been maintained on the internet since that time until the present day.  I have been contacted by Superintendent Pointon, Officers from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, State Crime Operations Command, relatives all asking questions about the material from 2006 until the present day."

 Because in law, these statements are not EVIDENCE, and because I had the author, the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala in the witness box under oath, I had him confirm that as "evidence under oath". He did just thatCorrupt Cop Henri Rantala Implicates Superintendent Dale Pointon
.This proves that Superintendent Pointon is corrupt.  Since his father, Laurie Pointon, was also a Senior Queensland cop, we wonder if the Pointon family is one of the CORRUPT POLICE FAMILIES indicated by respected Law academic Dr Christine Eastwood, wife of Southport Magistrate John Costanzo.  [See paragraph #5]

  
Rantala also Implicates Senior Officers From Ethical Standards Command, from Security Intelligence Branch, and from State Crime Operations Command 


http://haigreport.com/QldPoliceCorruption/QldPoliceCorruptionStatDecDrChristineEastwoodMagistrateJohnCostanzoRobertNeedhamHelenCouperCMC_PeterLindsayHansard25Nov2009.php#Statutory_Declaration

There is irrefutable conclusive evidence that the Brisbane City Council and the Queensland Government committed an armed robbery of me, as a preliminary and integral step towards stealing my house and land that IS my home, from me.   Corrupt cop Rantala Admits The Brisbane City Council Did Not Have a Court Order
to enter my property.



I again quote here from

20100628_Day3_KluckTranscriptMagistratesCourtCommittalCarriageService.pdf

Well, maybe we can see it some time. Okay. Now, you - getting back to the - turning up to my property on the 29th of November 2004, was it?   Yes.

St Lucia? You - you say they had authority to enter my property?   Yes.


Do you say they had authority to enter my property?   Yes.


Yeah. What was - did they have a Court order?   No.


They didn't have a Court order?   Not from my recollection they didn't.

 

Okay. So, what authority did they have?   It was stipulated to me the authority lay in the provisions of the Health Act. The - now, I can't be quoted on this, it's a vague recollection that there may have been some sort of notice that they've indicated they had sent to you regarding the matter. But as far as the specifics of it, I honestly, five - nearly six years ago, it's hard to remember.




The fact that the Queensland Police, various Queensland magistrates, Queensland Government Commissions, Queensland judges, and the Commonwealth of Australia Executive Government by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions [CDPP] engaged in episodes to cover-up and white wash the major armed robbery and fraud, shows conclusively that Queensland is utterly corrupt, and that this corruption extends to All of Australia by the actions of The Commonwealth of Australia Executive Government..

[We will continue to add to this timeline. It will act as a summary of all the details of this criminal fraud and armed robbery of a disabled old man by the extensive corruption in the legal profession, police, courts and government commissions and Departments in Queensland, extending to the Commonwealth of Australia Executive government.]

Firstly, Some Pertinent Facts:

From 1991, I was studying at The University of Qld.   I moved into my property at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia in the precincts of The University of Queensland on 28th February, 1994.

Douglas Porter was the Registrar of The University of Queensland, and secretly, and so unbeknown to me, the Chair of, and Representative of The University of Queensland on, St Johns College Council.  Importantly, Douglas Porter was also, for all relevant times [still is in 2012] the Chairman of St Johns College CouncilSt Johns College Council is a joint exercise between The University of Queensland and The Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC] aka the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane [CSDB].   St Johns College Council is the governing body of St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland.

I begin this Timeline/Chronology effectively with the Armed Robbery of me and much of my possessions, by the Queensland Government, with weapons supplied by the Queensland Police, on 29th November, 2004 and two further days immediately subsequent ie 30th November and 1st December, 2004, as the evidence is irrefutable, and conclusive, and is easily simple to understand.   This has not prevented many organs [for instance see Robert Walker, since made Commissioner of Body Corporates And Community Management] of the Queensland Government and of the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, engage in a CRIMINAL COVERUP & WHITEWASH, as I detail below. 

However, this was not the start of corruption and fraud against me by the Government of Queensland,  which can be traced back to 1974, and notorious corrupt labor & struck off lawyer Terence Joseph Mellifont - so the labor government made his wife, Julie Dick [but she is Julie Maree Mellifont on the electoral roll] a Judge of the District Court of Queensland] or earlier.  [Mellifont and Spender really cheated me when I was badly affected with brain damage and undiagnozed Obstructive Sleep Apnoea].  Struck off ex-solicitor and clandestine SP bookie, with police protection, Terence Joseph Mellifont aka TJ Mellifont aka Terry Mellifont, who familiarized himself with the corrupt cops when a corrupt solicitor, ensured that I was marked as a target on the secret Queensland Police files.  There have been many incidents pointing to the fact that I was targeted by Queensland Police. 

See attached: 

MellifontsBillofCosts.PDF

13th September, 2004:

See the clandestine letter/email to the Brisbane City Council:

20040913hugh2tannerkeepsecretpersoninquestion.jpg



Hugh McVean the trustee aka Fiduciary and hence with a Fiduciary Duty, of the Constructive Trust of which my house was the corpus, and of which, I was the sole beneficiary with Beneficial Ownership, wrote in secret, a clandestine letter to the Brisbane City Council, asking them to keep it secret, and encouraging them to continue to pursue me. He indicated a CLANDESTINE CONSPIRACY  with Brisbane City Council against meHugh McVean advised the Brisbane City Council that I was disabled.  That meant that Hugh McVean knew that apart from the Constructive Trust, he also owed me a Fiduciary Duty because of my disability.  Hugh McVean was closely advised by a firm of corrupt Nambour lawyers; [but then most lawyers by far are corrupt].  On a previous occasion in a meeting chaired by the Residential Tenancy Authority, I advised all that it was not a Residential Tenancy and that Hugh McVean owed me a Fiduciary Duty.  He asked me how to spell "FIDUCIARY" as he wrote it down.  He would have asked his lawyers the meaning.  Anyway, in law a Fiduciary is deemed to know his Fiduciary Duty.  Not to so know is a "mistake of Law" and a "mistake of law" can never be an excuse for illegality.

19th October, 2004:

See:

20041019WayneJohnToltonOpinoni.PDF

Even without the addition of weapons, clearly the Brisbane City Council were intent upon stealing my possessions from my yard so as to clear all my possessions from my yard for the speedy transfer of my property to The University of Queensland, St Johns College Council.  They knew they needed a court order but they did not want to argue the point or take the longer period of time to progress through the courts, because Douglas Porter, as Registrar of UQ and Chair of the St Johns College Council for UQ, wanted to use my house and land to accommodate Students in the 2005 Academic Year, as well as knowing that I had a PRIOR EQUITABLE RIGHT TO OWN MY PROPERTY.   They knew they could not simply break and enter.   They knew the law was clearThey needed a court order.  To corruptly circumvent the law, so as to have an "arguable case" if ever they were forced to it, the legal department of the Brisbane City Council, named the Brisbane City Legal Practice, decided to create an elaborate RUSE or ARTIFICE, but to do it with a degree of "secrecy" aka "Legal Professional Privilege".  The plan was hatched by David Askern, the Senior public sector parasite lawyer in Brisbane City Legal Practice.   This criminal fraud was perpetrated with the full knowledge and approval of David Askern. In fact, David Askern hatched the CRIMINAL PLAN to COMMIT ARMED ROBBERY.  There is more damaging evidence of illegality by David Askern.

They had corrupt barrister Wayne John Tolton, prepare an "opinion" which they could mis-interpret as permitting their unrestrained entry without a court order or my permission.  


25th November, 2004:

The Brisbane City Council wrote to me [received by me on Friday 26th November, 2004], advising that they intended entering my yard and removing my possessions without my permission. 

See:

20041125BCCentrynotice.pdf
20041125BCCentrynotice_cr01.jpg

29th November, 2004:

The Brisbane City Council  [by Principal perpetrators BCC personnel Steve Beck, Owen Benvenuti and Paul Maxwell] with the ARMED ASSISTANCE of Queensland police personnel, Henri Elias Rantala, and  Monica Louise Antony [BigA for Antony] forced entry to my land where I had UNDISPUTED EXCLUSIVE LEGAL & EQUITABLE POSSESSION.

The facts of the situation being:

  1. the police were armed, although they did not draw their weapons [but if I had picked up a piece of wood to legally and properly protect my property, I have no doubt I would have been shot].,

  2. they purported to enter for the Brisbane City Council;

  3. they forced entry, AND BROKE AND ENTERED;

  4. the Brisbane City Council did not have authority, of any type, to enter;

  5. I had exclusive possession of my property;

  6. many possessions of mine were removed from my property;

MEANS;  ==>

that all persons involved in the common purpose, are guilty of ARMED ROBBERY, & breaking, entering and stealing.  Many more will be guilty of being accessories, accomplices and/or aiders and abettors. and thus subject to the same penalties. 

One purpose of the Armed Robbery was to give the Brisbane City Council "grounds" to write a report of "how badly I had kept the premises and yard" to provide to Hugh McVean the Trustee of the Constructive Trust so that Hugh McVean could make out to the Small Claims Tribunal [which handles Residential Tenancy Disputes] that I was a mere tenant and so have me evicted. 

This "purpose" together with Hugh McVean's Secret letter of 13th September, 2004 make him an ACCESSORY TO THE ARMED ROBBERY.   For Hugh McVean, and my sister Coral Louise McVean, there is the aggravating factor, when Penalty is considered, that this crime was perpetrated while they had a Fiduciary Duty.  That usually means the Maximum penalty of imprisonment is doubled.

This was all done in this way by the McVeans and Brisbane City Council with the agreement of Douglas Porter, Chairman of, and Representative of The University of Queensland on St Johns College Council together with the other Party to St Johns College Council, the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC] aka The Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane [CSDB].   St Johns College Council ran St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland.

Rantala subsequently arrested me on bogus charges so that he did not need to remain longer at the location, to ensure I did not ostensibly, "break the law" but in reality to give the armed robbers a free run. 

7th February, 2005:

See:

TransferOf254HawkenDriveToBrisbaneAnglicanSynod1245024172_0_0.pdf

Hugh Douglas McVean, a trustee of the  Constructive Trust owning the Property at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, signed a transfer document, transferring the LEGAL TITLE OF MY PROPERTY OWNED BY ME AS BENEFICIARY OF THIS CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST, to the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane [CSDB] which is a joint venturer with The University of Queensland, in the St Johns College Council, of which Douglas Porter is Chair, and on which Douglas Porter is the Representative of The University of Queensland.

1st or 2nd March, 2005. 

See:

20050225AndrewRouyanianReConstructiveTrustLetterToClient250205.pdf

I received the advice from Andrew Rouyanian, a Solicitor  alerting me to the reality that I was the beneficiary of a CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST and so was the Beneficial Owner of my home at 254 Hawken Drive.  One or two days later I advised my neighbour, solicitor and ex-fellow student with me in 2006 at The University of Qld, Stephen Tonge, that my home, house and land was owned by a Constructive Trust of which I was the beneficiary. Stephen Tonge had been feigning friendship towards me while knowingly working to steal my home, house and land owned by me, from me.

Prior to this time, I had not realized that the relationship was a Constructive Trust. I had believed that I had Special rights by virtue of our agreement.
 
See "about Stephen Tonge".  Stephen Tonge was secretly working as lawyer and legal advisor for Douglas Porter, The University of Queensland, St Johns College Council, St Johns College, and the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane. As he was their lawyer in this matter, my advice to him was Notice to all of his clients.  Trust is a matter of Equity Law.  Stephen Tonge was at that time a partner with Flower & Hart, who subsequently completed the "transfer" of the Legal Title.

See attached:

TransferOf254HawkenDriveToBrisbaneAnglicanSynod1245024172_0_0.pdf

As this is a matter of Equity Law, my advice of my prior equitable interest to the lawyer for the purchaser, PRIOR to the SETTLEMENT [many years later] is notice of my prior equitable interest to the purchaser, the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane. Hence, at best for the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane, the most that the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane can claim to now hold, is the Legal title to my property but NOT the beneficial interest.

May, 2005:

[Proceedings in the SCT are not recorded.]

McVean my Trustee made out I was a mere tenant, took me to the Small Claims Tribunal to have me evicted and used as his main support, the report prepared by the Brisbane City Council when they committed the Armed Robbery, as part of his secret agreement with the Brisbane City Council to commit the Armed Bobbery

These McVean criminals had brought me, a disabled man before Magistrate William J (Bill) Randall in May, 2005 while trying to steal the same house.  Randall is the "referee" of the Queensland Small Claims Tribunal which deals with "Residential Tenancies".  As a disabled man, I was courteous and polite [I always am] to William J (Bill) Randall.  In contrast, William J (Bill) Randall was abusive to me, and the few words William J (Bill) Randall spoke to me were loud, ABRUPT and ABUSIVE; "be quiet, you will be told when to speak".   The disabled man had commenced an action  re this matter in another higher court, the Supreme Court of Queensland.  This meant that the SCT could do nothing.  I had documents of the other court to show to William J (Bill) Randall.  William J (Bill) Randall was "busy" pretending to be reading the Criminal McVean's complaint.  I tried to save William J (Bill) Randall wasting his time and so wished to show William J (Bill) Randall, the document of the other court.
 
After William J (Bill) Randall's drama outburst, I waited 'til William J (Bill) Randall had made out that he had read the criminal's complaint.  Clearly, the outcome had long been decided.  Clearly, Hugh McVean had been playing the victim to registry staff of the SCT of how he is so good and how his good nature is being abused, and this was passed on to Randall

Hugh's wife Coral Louise McVean was criminally compromised by Hugh McVean many decades ago, in
Insurance Fraud.

Upon my giving the higher court document to William J (Bill) Randall, William J (Bill) Randall
APOLOGISED  to Hugh McVean.  In a reasonably soft but distressed voice, William J (Bill) Randall APOLOGISED to McVean that "the matter is taken out of my hands".  "I am sorry I can do nothing.  He has commenced an action in the Supreme Court."  When he next spoke to me, he was again loud, abrupt and abusive.  It seemed to me as though William J (Bill) Randall was very familiar with McVean and his complaint, before that 2005 brief hearing commenced, and that William J (Bill) Randall had already made up is mind.   Hugh McVean's well practiced MO is to seek out decision makers, or the next in line to the decision maker [like "Registrar" of the Small Claims Tribunal [SCT]], and apologise for his "lack of knowledge or familiarity with the procedure and just explain  how he is at so much of a disadvantage because he is such a "good and Christian" person,  when in fact McVean is a "psychopathic control freak".  This is really due to Hugh McVean's PTSD.  Hugh McVean has long realized, since the tragic death of both of his parents when Hugh was aged 16 years, the value of playing the 'victim' fiction.
Hugh McVean has a well practiced patter of
playing the 'victim' fiction; along the lines that he is a poor unfortunate good souled person who has tried to do the best for his wife's "black sheep" brother, out of his compassion and charity, and this "black sheep" has taken advantage of this "poor generous and compassionate" Hugh McVean.  In fact Hugh McVean is a psychopath and pathological liar and cheat, [this is a common sympton of PTSD -  "Because the world has been so mean to me, I will place no limits upon what I will do to achieve good things for myself", is the view of many PTSD sufferers; it is a psychiatric disorder.], who set out to cheat his wife's brother to show how big he is.

It seems that William J (Bill) Randall considers that the SCT is his own kingdom and that William J (Bill) Randall can grant "favours" as and when he pleases, and to hell with the law and Due Process.  Afterall, Randall has Judicial Immunity.

An alternative explanation is that because the corruption in Qld courts arises due to the Chief Justice not acting against the corruption, and his also being Chancellor of the Anglican Diocese of Brisbane, the this has also become ANGLICAN CORRUPTION.  The Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan, Warden of St Johns College at The University of Queensland, thinks this has given him a licence to gain by corruption.

1st June, 2005. 

See transcript at:

20050601MagistrateCourtTranscriptFraudWalterHarveyEhrichJohnPedenPrasleyVPraser0000_tn.pdf

See the final word on this at:

20100730CourtOfAppealDecisionEvilEgregiousEhrichQCA196-RvMathews.pdf

The subsequently modified bogus charge came before Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich [subsequently termed Magistrate Topsy-Turvy by Qld Court of Appeal, and "Wally" by his corrupt police mates.]  I had called/subpoenaed  various witnesses, including from the Brisbane City Council to show that the entry to my yard, the pretext upon which Rantala arrested me, was illegal.   Magistrate Wally Topsy-Turvy [Walter Harvey Ehrich] was desperate and determined that no evidence would be heard, as if the evidence had been heard, it would have shown that the police [Queensland Government] and Brisbane City Council had committed an Armed Robbery. 

12th August, 2005. 

See:

20050812DecisionJusticeMargaretWhiteRepleadBrisbaneCityCouncilBS4337_2005_QSC05-222.pdf

A civil action against a number of related parties for related transactions, including for trespass on 29th November, 2004, and conversion  by the Brisbane City Council, was mentioned before Justice Margaret White in the Supreme Court of Queensland. She refused to disqualify herself for bias or conflict of interest.  She related her close connection to the University of QueenslandMargaret White struck out my pleadings, gave me leave to replead, but Ordered that Brisbane City Council be removed as a defendant in this action.  Of course I could commence another action against the Brisbane City Council, but, importantly, this made the consideration of the evidence of the Armed Robbery more remote.  Margaret White has Judicial Immunity from Prosecution for her evil actions.  Each of the Counsel coram her, being   John W. PedenJohn Peden and Mr Fraser Dawson, are also protected by Advocates Immunity.  Both Peden and White are well known to each other as Sycophants to The University of Queensland.



Consideration of her conclusion that the Brisbane City Council should be removed as a defendant needs further scrutiny. She had struck out the pleading, and given leave to replead. Therefore, she had nothing before her on which to base any decision that the Brisbane City Council be removed as a defendant. Now, it is a GIVEN, on the irrefutable evidence that the Brisbane City Council did not have authority to enter and the surrounding events, that an armed robbery by the Qld police and Brisbane City Council occurred. This Armed robbery was for the benefit of her favoured University of Queensland, its registrar Douglas Porter, and the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane, of which the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Paul de Jersey is and was, at all relevant times, Chancellor. Since this has cause me to be robbed of a vast amount of my possessions, plus been a preliminary and integral step of having me robbed of my beneficial ownership of my home for the benefit of her favoured University of Queensland and its Registrar Douglas Porter, and that that fraud of me has had many repeated steps before and since to conceal that fraud, it suggests that Justice Margaret White, acted as she did to assist the perpetration of these frauds. This at least, suggests she is biased against me and likely to make similar “biased” decision against me in the future. Importantly, on the 25th November, 2011, Margaret White refused to disqualify herself in the Queensland Court of Appeal, and subsequently found against me, in a case related to this Armed Robbery and major fraud.

8th November, 2005:

See attached:

20051108LSCBritonapprovesBCCtrespasserrorreTolt.pdf


Another extremely dumb or corrupt Queensland Government Commissioner, is John Briton, Legal Services Commissioner.  He committed his corruption in writing.   His "view" is wrong as would be known by high school students in legal studies.  See:  the Correct Legal PrincipleA Regulation or a section of a regulation  cannot over-ride a right in a statute or a common law right.    That he, and  so many others would put their corruption in writing indicates his confidence, and the confidence of so many others, in the complete widespread corruption in Queensland and Australia.

See in his attached letter the paragraph:

You are also of the view that Mr Tolton's advice is incorrect as he has misinterpreted sections 200 and 209 of the Regulation and failed to examine appropriate case law in the area. I have examined the relevant sections of the Heallh Regulation 1996 and the cases referred to your complaint. I am of the view that Mr Tolton's advice was correct and that the BCC is not required to seek permission from a Court before entering the premises. Section 200 provides a statutory right to the BCC to enter a place after it has issued a notice pursuant to section 209 if that notice has not been complied with.


It is interesting to compare the way two different Corrupt Qld Commissioners express the same corruption.  Compare John Briton's with that written by Robert Walker now Commissioner, Body Corporate & Community Management but previously of the Qld Crime and Misconduct Commission and his letter dated 10th April, 2006. I suggest that Robert Walker's style is his admission that he knows it is false, bogus and corrupt.  When all this eventually 'hits the fan', and it will, each of the many corrupt individuals will want everyone to believe that their mistake of law was a genuine mistake.

9th February, 2006: 

See:

20060209BrisbaneCityCouncil_v_RussellGordonHaigMathews2006QSC025BS729_06_FrybergJ_VexatiousLitigantOrderQSC06-025.pdf

In my Action against the Brisbane City Council, Justice Henry George Fryberg of the Supreme Court of Queensland  deemed me a Vexatious Litigant so summarily defeating my action against The Brisbane City Council and banning me from suing them again, so giving the protection of the Supreme court of Queensland to Armed Robbers and Fraudsters of a Disabled Old Man..  See his evil decision.  Justice Henry George Fryberg of the Supreme Court of Queensland has Judicial Immunity from Prosecution for his evil actions.  The Counsel coram him, on that occasion,  John W. Peden is also protected by Advocates Immunity.   John W. Peden is a evil corrupt obsequious barrister closely associated with Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland, where he grovels to gain undeserved privilege from Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland.    John W. Peden also acted as a conduit between The University of Queensland and the Brisbane City Council to permit the collaboration to commit the fraud.  They expect that they are protected regarding this conduit for their Conspiracy to Defraud by Client Privilege aka Legal Professional Privilege

10th April, 2006: 

See:

20060410CMCapproveBCCtrespass.PDF

In response to my complaint to the Crime and Misconduct Commission, this letter dated 10th April, 2006 was sent to me. His rational is false.  It is basic law of  Statute v Regulation   A Regulation or a section of a regulation  cannot over-ride a right in a statute or a common law right.    The Author of this, Robert Walker is clearly corrupt.  He has apparently been rewarded for his corruption by his elevation/promotion to Commissioner, Body Corporate & Community Management.   Clearly, the Body Corporate & Community Management Commission [BCCM] is part of the extensive corruption of bribery and payola in Queensland.


23rd May, 2006:

See:

20060523page9reInfoCommapproveBCCtrespass.pdf &

20060523_20100610_ReInfoComDecisionSusanBarkerOfficeInformationCommissioner20060523RePoliceBCC_ArmedRobbery_2005 F0323 - Dec - 23-05-06.pdf

Queensland's "Assistant" Information Commissioner, Susan Barker, [ie Sue Barker; in Russian language 'subarka' - in latin script rather than Cyrillic - means DOG; - I wonder how appropriate?] she found, in an error apparent to a high schools student of legal studies, that a regulation [Section 200] [since revoked], composed by public sector parasites and rubber stamped in a Government Gazette,  could over-ride the rights in a Statute, approved by a majority in the democratically elected parliament;. Section 160 Health Act 1937.  [The "Entry" provisions were later amended to section 144 whereby the Council could apply for a warrant from a Magistrate, ex parte.] However, at the time of the Armed Robbery, to enter, without my permission, the Brisbane City Council, and anyone entering for them were required to obtain a Mandatory Court Order after giving me a Right to be Heard [Natural Justice] in the court.  See Sub Sec (ii)Section 160 Health Act 1937.
In fact, the office of the Information Commissioner [OIC] has been an oft repeated source of coverup of the Crime of Armed Robbery by the Queensland government and the Brisbane City Council and the crime of "Land Fraud" by Douglas PorterIn time we will detail here, at least THREE independent instances by the Information Commissioner of Queensland.


23rd August, 2006:

I began publishing the HaigReport.com website online as a PUBLIC MEDIA.  As such, that publication has Qualified Privilege.  Qualified Privilege is particularly robust when the publication is

  1. exposing crime;

  2. exposing lying, even mere hypocrisy, let alone FRAUD & CRIME, by Public officials or even just ANYONE in, or connected to, Public life.

  3. In combination; that is, for CRIME by PUBLIC OFFICIALS, [our Raison d'Ítre for HaigReport.com], this Qualified Privilege is impenetrable



Qualified Privilege is a protection against all law suits, not just the usual of defamation.   It does not matter if the publication is not totally true or true at all, but only that the publisher took reasonable steps to check the accuracy.   In Australia, there is a further protection for publication in the public Media, if the subject matter is discussion related to Political Elections.  There is a Freedom of Speech related to discussion of political matters.  The general tenor of what constitutes Qualified Privilege can be gained by considered decision by the higher courts in common law jurisdictions around the world. There is for instance the TEN point test as devised by the House of Lords in the UK in the in the Reynolds Case. In a subsequent case, the House of Lords clarified that the TEN Criteria were not "hurdles" but mere POINTERS to be considered.   A subsequent case confirmed that the protection was greater not only if the matter was a discussion of political matters, but of general public interest, [which does not include mere curiosity]. 

Further Freedom of Speech protection can be gained by publishing websites on servers either in the US or where the Internet transmission is likely to pass through the United States where they have the Freedom of Speech Amendment to their Constitution.  For most purposes in law [the notable exception being defamation], the place of publication is the location of the Server on which the Website files are stored and where each page is distinctly composed by the server from the stored files and other data, each time it is accessed.

From August, 2006:

Soon after commencing my website HaigReport, I noticed the most frequent visitor each month and a usual visitor each day was Douglas Porter.  Douglas Porter was Registrar of The University of Queensland, and, unknown to me at the time, Representative of The University of Qld on, and Chairman of, the St Johns College Council that ran St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus Of The University of Qld.   I knew this regular and most frequent visitor was Douglas Porter, as he had a Fixed or Static IP, and I soon realized it was his.  We could see the Search Terms he used in Google.  In fact, Douglas Porter had the same IP for his use of the Internet from his home.  There have been  occasions when Douglas Porter was accessing my sites at 2am and 4am [on different days].   I did not realize the reason for Douglas Porter's obsession, but now realize that he was orchestrating the theft of my beneficial interest in my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, and for that purpose was orchestrating the purchase of the Legal title to my home, controlled by the trustee of the Constructive Trust..

The Two parties represented on the St Johns College Council are The University of Queensland and the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane [CSDB] aka Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC].  Soon after the appointment of Paul de Jersey as Chief Justice of Queensland, the BDAC found it "beneficial" to appoint him as "Chancellor of the BDAC.  Douglas Porter, as Chairman of St Johns college Council, secretly orchestrated the CSDB having transferred to it, the legal title of my home, of which I owned the beneficial Title, and having me dispossessed of my possession of my home so they could claim that they bought my house property without knowledge of my prior beneficial interest. In Law, this is not now nor then possible as they had already been advised of my prior beneficial Interest because I had advised their legal representative Stephen Tonge.  All this time, Porter was orchestrating repeated acts of discrimination, cheating and criminal conduct towards me by personnel at The University of Qld.  Porter should have disqualified himself from dealing with me during this time, but failed to do so. 

October 2006:

police blocked my reporting crime by blocking my emails for bogus reasons:

See:

20100917WillCocksAHRC_QldPoliceQPS_ResponseOf20100907.pdf

I communicate almost exclusively by email as I am disabled and my computer is my main disability Aid.   Because I have Brain Damage I prefer to communicate in writing.  Because I had been the target of an Armed Robbery, the "appropriate" people to whom to report this crime is the police. Because the police had committed the Armed Robbery, this was one way of discovering if the crime was by a single cop or if the whole police service was guilty. As can be seen at the second paragraph on page 2 of a letter from the Queensland police, the police blocked my emails for bogus reasons, just so they did not have to bother.  They really are corrupt. 

Anyway, it does not matter at all, as it is far better that, if I have anything to say, I say it in a PUBLIC MEDIUM such as the HaigReport.com where I and my authors have Qualified Privilege. What it does show is the culpability of the Queensland police Sevice.   Why would any decent person join the Queensland police? That truly is a rhetorical question.

Qualified Privilege is particularly robust in relation to exposure of Crime and Exposure of lying and hypocrisy in public life.   Publishing evidence of ARMED ROBBERY by PUBLIC OFFICIALS, should be well and truly protected.   I have quite a bit of detail about Qualified Privilege online at these previously mentioned links, and I think it is worth a  read if you have the time.      I think public publication with Qualified Privilege  is in preference to courts and governments. It changes the game. I will not bother with courts as plaintiff in civil actions, as corrupt judges and magistrates will try to just frustrate, by striking out applications, and other corrupt actions.   I will just wait 'til the corrupt parasites try to sue me in Crime.  They will not then try to have the action discontinued.  Of course, corrupt judges will try to exclude QP, but I can appeal that to the highest courts.  Usually there are no filing fees for criminal appeals [except to the Australian High Court - but that is the last stop before the case goes to a UN Committee in Geneva, Switzerland]. In a criminal trial, I will have an opportunity to cross examine the perjuring police [such as my Cross Examination Of Corrupt Police Parasite Henri Elias Rantala and government officials.  As I am trained in law it is quite inexpensive for me. I would expect to obtain a better result than if I employed a "lawyer" in practice.  Those lawyers have a paramount Duty to the Court, [and corrupt judges] and have Advocates Immunity.  In general the legal profession in Queensland is CORRUPT.  Of course, each and every occasion on which I am charged by police, I have wonderful material to publish on HaigReport.com /.  See also where Brisbane Magistrate Paul M Kluck [aka Klutz] ridiculed me for being disabled, and ridiculed my disability of Brain damage.

23rd January, 2007:

See attached:

20070123REPLYSpence.JPG

I received this letter dated 23rd January, 2007 from Judy Spence the Qld Police Minister at the time.  My reaction was to write this page and send this audio message.

30th September, 2007:

At about 1am, a student intellectual lightweight named Regan Ireland began a Facebook Hate & 'Incitement to Murder' Site called, "FUCK OFF DUCKMAN".   I kept a number of ducks.  The 30th September was a Sunday in 2007. 

Douglas Porter was right onto that site, first thing Monday Morning.  I do not know if he was viewing it on Sunday.   I discovered it because Douglas Porter, in his traditional lazy  style clicked on the live hyperlink to my website haigreport.com that Simon Kalinowski has placed on the facebook Hate Site at 3:03AM on the 1st September, 2007.   Porter clearly was too dumb to realize that whenever he came to my site in that way, I was seeing the referrer site, so could tell he had been viewing the Fuck OFF DUCKMAN Site.  Douglas Porter did that every day for the month that that site was online.  As you can see I recorded most of the data from the Hate site. In particular I recorded the names of all the people who agreed with the language and sentiment of the site "SOME ONE KILL HIM PLZ"

Clearly, Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland were aware of the scandalous website called "FUCK OFF DUCKMAN'".  Yet, Douglas Porter ACTIVELY CONDONED IT.
 
The names of the 125 people are at on our site now.    We calculate that they have collectively cost themselves about $25million.

22nd May 2008:

See:

20080522OfficeInformationCommissionBogusJustificationSoBrisbaneCityCouncilNeedNotDealFreedonOfInformationApplicationsRussellMathews.pdf

'First" Assistant Commissioner, Rangihaeata in her diatribe dated 22nd May, 2008, found FOR BOGUS NONSENSICAL REASONS, that the Armed Robbers, the Brisbane City Council, could refuse to provide me with information pursuant to the Freedom of Information Legislation.

During August, 2008:

A corrupt parasite Superintendant Brian Hay of the Queensland police, tried to bully the webhost for HaigReport.com, in New South Wales [where Qld police have no jurisdiction] to close down all of our websites, WITHOUT GIVING ANY REASON except secrecy provision of terrorism legislation.  As a result, to save the webhost any more problems with these corrupt parasite pigs, the websites' host servers were moved overseas, although the Australian Webhost in New South Wales did not require it.  

1st December, 2008:

See attached:

SANY0202_20081201WalterHarveyEhrichJohnPedenMsVPraserBrisbaneCityLegalPractice_cr_cr_tn673x600.jpg

Because Parasite Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich had made a deceitful corrupt decision, I set about to destabilize him with publications on my website.   He made a corrupt decision on the 1st June, 2005, and importantly, when I calmly advised him appropriately, he bellowed at me " Well just SIT DOOOOWN! would you" [line 44] BIG BIG MISTAKE YOU PARASITE EHRICH.   

Here, in his own handwriting, he starts to do back flips.   I am pleased to say, my websites confronted him.

See notation on court file:

SANY0202_20081201WalterHarveyEhrichJohnPedenMsVPraserBrisbaneCityLegalPractice_cr_cr_tn673x600.jpg

17th December, 2008:

See attached:

20081217MagistrateCourtTranscriptFraudFarceWalterHarveyEhrichPoliceSgtCox.pdf

Magistrate Topsy Turvy aka Ehrich together with compliant police prosecutor, held a farcical "hearing" so Ehrich could attempt to put the matter right.  Read the transcript.   Read the dickhead stumbling police prosecutor  Sgt COX, "og ah ow ah".  See what the Court of Appeal had to say about this.



7th February, 2009:

Queensland police attempted to close down my websites overseas for no justifiable reason [except their dislike because it exposed Queensland police corruption - "What a tangled Web" as they commit more crime to conceal earlier crime  - See their email; Scroll to the TAN PANEL on this page], without grounds and without giving me  Natural Justice which is my Right to be Heard.

28th August, 2009:

Corrupt Queensland police, because they could not close down my websites, came and seized my Disabilities Aids of computer [for my brain damage disability and hand writing disability] and Camera [for transcription due to my handwriting disability], and charged me "using a carriage service, ie broadband, to upload content to websites such that the Armed Robber, the corrupt Henri Elias Rantala, was offended or felt harassed".  It mattered not to those corrupt police that Rantala was a criminal many times over, and All websites are public media and thus have Qualified Privilege which extends to all journalists who write on these publicly viewable websites, or other employees or contractors who assist with these publications. 

14th September, 2009 to 24th September, 2010:

See the Menu of the 18 separate TRANSCRIPTS [which are all online]  of the Magistrate Court Appearances resulting from this arrest.  The four charges have not progressed to a completed Committal hearing,  yet, to the 9th April, 2012 but is at present [9th April, 2012], in the High Court of Australia.

23rd February, 2010:

My response to the arrest, charges and theft of my Disability Aids by Queensland police, was to launch an appeal, ALMOST SIX YEAR OUT OF TIME, to the conviction of me, [as confirmed in the letter from Police minister Judy Spence dated 23rd January, 2007]by magistrate "Wally" Walter Harvey Ehrich, [later called "topsy-Turvy" by the Qld Court of Appeal].

19th March, 2010:

Ex Qld DPP, and now DCJ Leanne Clare heard the appeal, and foolishly in a dumb act decided, when that decision had the effect of concealing, the egregious, evil act of magistrate "Wally" [to his corrupt police mates] Walter Harvery Ehrich, to coverup and whitewash the Armed Robbery, that the decisions of  Magistrate "topsy-Turvy" target="_blank"   on 1st December, 2008 and  17th December, 2008 meant I had no reason to appeal.

23rd March, 2010: 

Within days of the patently wrong decision of ex DPP now District Court Judge Leanne Clare, [as a courtesy between judicial officers, they do not mention, by name, the judges and magistrates who made the errors], I had Appealed and sought Leave to Appeal to the Queensland Court of Appeal.   I won that appeal resoundingly.

24th June, 2010:

See also the ridicule of me and my Brain Damage Disability by the foolish, dumb magistrate Paul M Kluck:  ""BENCH [Paul M Kluck]: So, have you got your thoughts back together again, Mr Mathews?" 

Although I am not unintelligent and have a Law Degree, Commerce Degree and mathematics majors in my Science Degree and Arts Degree, I do have brain damage, that produces Special Needs for me to exist, arising from my becoming quickly  mentally fatigued and soon mentally exhausted.  Despite my repeated advices and demands, Magistrate Paul M Kluck [the Klutz], refused to Accommodate my Special Needs.    Kluck the Klutz's ridicule of me and my brain damage disability is an indication of his unlawful discrimination and denial of my having a Fair Hearing.  Kluck the Klutz recognized that he had a Duty to ensure I had a fair hearingMagistrate Kluck admits he was required to ensure I was granted a Fair hearing.   In fact, Magistrate Paul M Kluck, admitted he denied me a fair hearing.  He had clearly thought that I could just be forced to continue and, in that way, denied a fair hearing.  Because of Kluck's Denial of a Fair Hearing which was thus a Denial of Due Process, the hearing coram magistrate Paul M. Kluck was thus untra vires and a nullity.   I engaged in the committal hearing for three days of the six days allocated. After those three days, I refused to appear for three months while Kluck continued to threaten me.  Finallly, on the 24th September, 2010, Kluck referred this hearing to the District Court to determine if I was "fit to stand trial".    I ceased attending about three weeks BEFORE my resounding victory, and most of the "deliberations" by Kluck Klutz occurred AFTER that decision of my RESOUNDING VICTORY.

After Kluck had terminated his involvement in my case, for the time being, I lodged a Section 222 of the Justices Act of 1886 (Qld) Appeal to the District Court.  That meant that the single thread of court cases, had become two, and my appeal thread took precedence in time.

20th July, 2010:

See attached:

20100730CourtOfAppealDecisionEvilEgregiousEhrichQCA196-RvMathews.pdf

I had a resounding victory in the Queenland Court of Appeal of the Decision [in fact decisionSS], of Magistrate Wally, Topsy Turvy, Walter Harvey Ehrich of 1st June, 2005, 1st December, 2008 and 17th December, 2008.    I suspect those responsible for the extensive corruption in Queensland, as I have experienced it, might have been feeling a little uneasy especially given the dicta by Her Honour McMurdo P. /.

25th October, 2010:


After Kluck had terminated his involvement in my case, for the time being, I lodged a Section 222 of the Justices Act of 1886 (Qld) Appeal to the District Court.  That meant that the single thread of court cases, had become two, and my appeal thread took precedence in time.

I lodged my Section 222 of the Justices Act of 1886 (Qld)Appeal to the Decisions of Kluck, to the District CourtThe Judge, second in line to the corrupt Chief District Court Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe, one KJOB [DCJA (Administrator) Kerry John O'Brien] took control of my two cases [the two threads], in the District Court and expressed his determination to maintain control of them himself.

25th October, 2010:

See the site discussing how DCJA [District Court Judge Administrator] Kerry John O'Brien [KJOB] wanted to stamp his mark on my Cases.

25th October, 2010:

See the Menu of matters surrounding the TWO MATTERS to be heard in the District Court.

4th November, 2010:

See the Menu of matters of Public Sector parasites in the District Court Registry trying to stuff me around.

25th November, 2011:

My appeal of the decision of the DCJA Kerry John O'Brien [just KJOB in my work] was heard in the Qld Court of Appeal.   Importantly, all three judges including the evil Margaret White, refused to disqualify themselves.

13th December, 2011:

See attached:

20111213CourtOfAppealDecisionMathews_v_CommissionerofPolice2011QCA368_QCA11-368.pdf

Justice Margaret White, was lead judge on the Court of Appeal Panel, which delivered their decision refusing to invoke their Original Jurisdiction to consider the irrefutable evidence properly before them in this matter, where that irrefutable evidence showed that the Brisbane City Council and the Government of Queensland that had appointed her, [Justice Margaret White], and The University of Queensland were guilty of Armed Robbery and Criminal Fraud of a Disabled Old Man. Importantly, the irrefutable evidence showed that I wss repeatedly denied Accommodation of my Special Needs through invoking Special Measures, which the Commonwealth of Australia Executive Government is bound to invoke by the Convention on the rights of Persons with Disabilities.


Of course, as I have explained previously, the point of our uploading these pages before all the content has been added to the individual pages, but still promoting these pages in the top panel of each of the hundreds of thousands of page imprints each months produced by our websites., is so that Google et al will see that the pages are being constantly upgraded and so Google et al  will rate our pages more highly

3rd January, 2012:

On this day, 3rd January, 2012, I sought "special" leave of the High Court of Australia to appeal the above decision of the Queensland Court ot Appeal, when the bench was lead by the evil Justice Margaret White.   Today [21st April, 2012,] no decision has been forthcoming from the HCA.   Should my aplication fail there, I have then exhausted all domestic remedies.  Exhausting all domestic remedies is a condition to my then taking this as a "communication" [a further "appeal"] to the UN's Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Geneva, Switzerland.  I  clearly have standing to so "appeal" as I am disabled.    I can easily and irrefutably prove that I am disabled and that the Armed Robbery occurred and the involvement of the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia in that so invoking the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities .  I can then show that my disability has been related to the Armed Robbery and to my subsequent arrest and trial.  That that "original crime" of Armed Robbery has been or attempted to have been concealed or covered-up by Qld police, Magistrates,  JudgeS, Qld Government Commissions and Commissioners, and COMMONWEALTH PROSECUTORS, with bogus, and clearly false "justifications" will highlight just how extensive the corruption is in Qld & AUSTRALIA.  This REALIZATION of the REALITY of CRIME in AUSTRALIA, will just cascade throught these subsequent events.   With each event of "coverup" in turn, the extent or size of the Qld corruption has been shown to be thAt much more ingrained & EXTENSIVE.  This monumental corruption then has an effect cascading back through corrupt events preceding the Armed Robbery on 25th November, 2004.

I am astounded at the level of corruption in Queensland and Australia, that these events confirm.  This level of corruption in the CRIMINAL ELITE, has been permitted to permeate our society due principally to the apathy of people in general and Australians in particular.



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.


These four charges, PROSECUTED by the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, are a continuation of and related to the exploitation of me in that my home was stolen by the Queensland Government including the Qld Police and the University of Queensland. After the many episodes where my complaints to various parts of the Queensland Government as I detail in the latter part of Part 4 of this document above, the detail of the armed Robbery leading up to the final exploitation of me by separating me from my home so stealing my home from me, was published on the Internet. As the police officer, forced entry while armed when he had no authority to enter my property where I had exclusvie possession,


When considered against the background that the Queensland Government including the University of Queensland and the Queensland Police had exploited me, because I was an easier mark because I am disabled, to gain control of my home secretly, by stealth, and in so doing stealing it from me, so that it could be used by the University of Queensland, and these charges proffered by the Queensland Police but prosecuted by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions directed at concealing the exploitation of a disabled person,, these violations of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, appear stark.


These four charges are a continuation of the discrimination and exploitation of me.


20091102BriefEvidenceReUseOfCarriageService.pdf

20091202Hunter20091021RantalaLieReArmedRobberyWitnessStatement.pdf


On the 24th, 25th and Monday the 28th June, 2010, while the defendant in the Committal hearing in relation to these four charges, and despite my pleas I was denied accommodation of my Special Needs due to my brain damage. Due to my brain damage, after a short time of maybe one or two hours, of concentration in blocks on any one day my mind goes completely blank, and I cannot think of anything. I am effectively on “autopilot”. I even forget what I am thinking about. The magistrate forced me to continue with repeated, “Ask another question” “Ask another question” “Ask another question” “Ask another question” he continued to railroad me.


My argument is that Shane Hunter, the prosecutor from the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions [CDPP] cannot claim that it has nothing to do with him but that the magistrate is in control of the hearing. Hunter is not a mere observer. He is a participant. Hunter and the CDPP have alleged that it is not their responsibility. They have self control, they have independent will. They are not automatons. They are attempting to apply the Nazi argument at Nuremberg who tried the argument that in following orders it was beyond their control.


My argument is that Hunter and the CDPP should not have participated in a proceeding when my rights were being abrogated because they had free will. They were not automatons. They could see that my rights were being denied me. They should have ceased to participate. In practice, they should have advised that intended stance to the court so as to ensure that my rights were honoured in any matter in which they were a volunteer participant.


My mental exhaustion increased over the three days such that I was too ill to rise from my bed on the fourth day.


It is a further outrage that, as well as denying me accommodation of my special needs, it is suggested that I am so mentally defective as not to be fit to stand trail and so could have my rights of self determination taken from me. Although Hunter expressed the view that I was not unfit to stand trial, he did not act as he should have and withdrawn.


The magistrate and Hunter of the CDPP try to state that my Special Needs were being accommodated because I was permitted to bring my two wee assistance dogs to court, and that they had “regular breaks”. I was nto consulted about the “regular breaks”. The “regular Breaks” cause me extra problems because each was an extra job for me to undertake. They caused me more problems.


I shall now include excerpts from the transcripts, where firstly I was pleading for accommodation of my special needs and later at mentions when I was not present, the admissions that I was under great difficulty due to my disability.


The transcripts for the first three days are:

20100624_Day1_KluckTranscriptMagistratesCourtCommittalCarriageService.pdf

20100625_Day2_KluckTranscriptMagistratesCourtCommittalCarriageService.pdf


[On day two, the following exchange is stated to have occurred but I think it was misheard:

DEFENDANT: No, your Honour, but have a duty not to take advantage of me.


BENCH: Nobody's taken advantage of it.


DEFENDANT: Just - I want to take advantage of my disabilities.  [Editorial:  I want to check the audio recording on this. I believe I more likely said "I want no-one take advantage of my disabilities."]]


20100628_Day3_KluckTranscriptMagistratesCourtCommittalCarriageService.pdf


On 24th June, 2010, the following disability Discrimination of me occurred in the Magistrates Court,


BRENDAN SCOTT READ, CONTINUING:




CROSS-EXAMINATION:




DEFENDANT: Thank you, your Honour. I have difficulty with my brain damage, being able to concentrate for long periods of time. And so I'm best in the morning and it gets that nothing drops, after a period of time. You know, and I'm getting that way now, because I know I've made notes I wanted to ask this witness, and I'm actually forgetting where I put them too. And so     


BENCH: You're not saying though that you can't function after lunch though, are you?


DEFENDANT: Oh, no, not after - not that - it drops off.


BENCH: Yes. Well, I think we'll adjourn about 4 o'clock. So.


DEFENDANT: Well, I'm finding difficulty right now, your Honour.


BENCH: Mmm.


DEFENDANT: Right this minute, in organising my thoughts and you know, it probably is quite obvious too, that I am     


BENCH: Well, I don't - I don't know you from any other appearances, Mr Mathews, other than today, so I can't comment on what's your normal demeanour is like.
 
[Editorial: Re normal demeanour: Consider what Kluck says many weeks later when it has been dragging on for months, and Kluck wanted to get rid of it given that I had had a resounding victory in the Queensland Court of Appeal, on the same subject matter just 26 days after this day, and which win by me was described as the Talk of the Legal World in a Column of the Brisbane Daily Newspaper called, 'The Courier Mail'.]

DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH: I accept what you say, but     


DEFENDANT: can I - can I     


BENCH:      the thing is, though, we only have so much time for these matters. And it is listed for six days, but - and tomorrow is going to be a late start     


DEFENDANT: What I'm suggesting     


BENCH:      as well, for the reasons I've said.


DEFENDANT: Yes - what I'm suggesting     


BENCH: We can't adjourn you know, 2.30, 3 o'clock, every day. It's 20 past 3 now. I had a break just then because of your dogs.


DEFENDANT: Yeah, okay. Oh, okay.


BENCH: Are you able to continue?


DEFENDANT: I don't feel I'm able to right now, your Honour.


BENCH: So is this going to happen every day?


DEFENDANT: I don't know, your Honour. I hope not. And - but you know, it's - unfortunately I can't be controlled when I can concentrate - I can't force myself to concentrate, like at one time I could.


BENCH: Mmm.


DEFENDANT: I can't now. And sometimes nothing will drop, and I'm - I forget where I put things, and I forget what I wanted to ask, and I forget the thought when I'm in the middle of it sometimes. And you may have noticed me this afternoon just     


BENCH: Well, like I say, I don't know you from previous times and what your demeanour is normally like. But I take what you say, as being the case, but    

[Editorial: Re 'normal' demeanour: Consider what Kluck says many weeks later [on 15th September, 2010], when this "committal even" has been dragging on for months,

See attached:

20101110_Lee-AnneRyanMagistratesCouirtKluckOn_20100915_TRANSCRIPT-#708739-v1-RUSSELL_GORDON_HAIG_MATHEWS.pdf


and Kluck wanted to get rid of it given that I had had a resounding victory in the Queensland Court of Appeal, on the same subject matter just 26 days after this day, and which win by me was described as the Talk of the Legal World in a Column of the Brisbane Daily Newspaper called, 'The Courier Mail'.]


DEFENDANT: I can't - I can't     


BENCH: You leave me in a difficult position, Mr Mathews, as to what to do. Because as I say     


DEFENDANT: I don't know about the future, your Honour, but     


BENCH: I have to ensure that you get a fair hearing, but I also have to be mindful that Court time is precious.


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH: Mr Hunter, do you have anything - objection if we adjourn now? How much longer - well, if I can ask you, Mr Mathews, how much longer do you think you'll be with this witness?


DEFENDANT: Well I don't know, your Honour. Like my thoughts aren't collected at the moment and I'm unable to do that. It's - I - you know, this is what I'm left with, myself, your Honour. I can't you know, I mean - when I'm in my own devices, I can come and go and do things like you know, you know, I can go - I can do different things at different times. When this strikes me at any other time in my own life, I can go and do something else, which is rather mechanical. And also being able to explain what I - how I manage it too, your Honour, is difficult.

BENCH: And you can't manage it by other means?


DEFENDANT: I've got permanent brain damage, your Honour.


BENCH: But with medication and that     


DEFENDANT: No, no medication.


BENCH: To assist you with concentration and that? 


DEFENDANT: Concentration, yes, your Honour.


BENCH: But you don't take medication?


DEFENDANT: Well, it won't help. I've got - I've got     


BENCH: Look, the only thing I know is from the correspondence between you and the Chief Magistrate about your dogs, is on file there, and you go into your disabilities there. So - yes, thank you, you can leave. You're excused for the day. We'll adjourn till 11 a.m.


DEFENDANT: Thank you, your Honour.


MR HUNTER: Your Honour, could I just place on the record, perhaps given the short start tomorrow     


BENCH: Yes?


MR HUNTER:      there are a couple of witnesses who I would like to interpose rather than have them sitting around for hours tomorrow; that's Mr and Mrs Dick.


BENCH: Well, there's no reason to believe that they won't be quick in and out of the box, quickly.


MR HUNTER: I would hope so. But I would prefer to put them in

at 11, and then continue with     


BENCH: Yes, is there any objection to that, tomorrow, Mr and Mrs Dick being interposed?


DEFENDANT: What, and the     


BENCH: And then come back to this witness, Mr Read.


DEFENDANT: Cross-examining the Dicks after that?


BENCH: Interpose, interpose those other two witnesses, and then come back to Mr Read.


DEFENDANT: Okay.


BENCH: Do you have any issue with that?


DEFENDANT: Well I probably would have preferred to keep in the sequence but     


BENCH: I think we'll revisit that in the morning, when Mr Mathews has got his thoughts together.


DEFENDANT: Well, the thing is, long as I - well, I'd like to know what we're going to be doing tomorrow. Yeah, okay.


MR HUNTER: Mr Read will be here at 11 o'clock tomorrow; I'll be here at 11.


BENCH: I can't see a problem with the other witnesses being interposed in these committal proceedings. But we'll     


MR HUNTER: In the circumstances, your Honour, Mr Read will be first witness again tomorrow.


BENCH: Well, what's he got to do tomorrow, has he got anything else - what are the - Mr and Mrs Dick, what are they doing tomorrow?


MR HUNTER: Well, she runs a child     


BENCH: If they're not giving evidence. I mean, Mr Read could be in the box for the rest of tomorrow, as well, we don't know. He's under cross-examination.


MR HUNTER: Well, in the circumstances of what's been said, we'll keep it in sequence.


BENCH: All right. So, 11 a.m. Anything else there?


DEFENDANT: Could I just ask, your Honour, for - basically as I see it there are - apart from the four websites, there are basically two     


BENCH: So, have you got your thoughts back together again, Mr Mathews?


DEFENDANT: I'm just trying - something else I already thought about, previously, your Honour.


BENCH: Mr Read, you can leave the witness box. Come back at 11 tomorrow?   Thank you, your Honour.

WITNESS STOOD DOWN

DEFENDANT: There's basically two elements, the [indistinct] and the police are [indistinct] Antony.


BENCH: There's four charges.


DEFENDANT: There's four charges, but they relate to two evidential matters.


BENCH: What's the question that you want to ask me?


DEFENDANT: How are they interposed into the four charges?


BENCH: Consider all the material that you've got overnight. And if you're still in any doubt, you can raise it with Mr Hunter before we start tomorrow.





On.DATE 09/07/2010 coram Kluck The following exchange occurred:


BENCH: So I'm back - so I'll mention it on - on Tuesday, the 10th     


MR HUNTER: Court     


BENCH:      in - in Court 20.


MR HUNTER: Twenty?

BENCH: Twenty, yes, at 9 a.m. Happy for a 9 a.m.?


MR HUNTER: Oh, yes, your Honour.


BENCH: Right. And see what happens - see what communication's given to the Court in that period.


MR HUNTER: I'm concerned, your Honour, that, as - as I said before, there is not one shred of sworn, medical evidence before the Court that he is, in fact, disabled.


BENCH: Mmm.


MR HUNTER: In my submission, any correspondence with him henceforth should require that he produces contemporary medical evidence before the Court indulges him with these special measures, so he says.


BENCH: Right. So you suggest, well, but not just a - a medical certificate saying he's unfit to - to come to Court?


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: Not just that?


MR HUNTER: Not just that. In fact, your Honour would place     


BENCH: Well, I don't know what Mr Mathews - whether he has seen - he talks about Dr Moyle, but whether he's seen Dr Moyle recently     


MR HUNTER: Yes, which begs the question: is he just playing games with us?


BENCH: Well, I don't know. But - but you're not raising the issue of his - of his fitness for trial, so     


MR HUNTER: No     


BENCH:      you're expressing perhaps the opposite?


MR HUNTER: Exactly.


BENCH: And he's seeking to delay the proceedings, but, as I said, the last resort is releasing that warrant on - on the 10th of August     


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH:      if he hasn't     


MR HUNTER: And I would urge your Honour     


BENCH: Mmm.


MR HUNTER:      to - before embarking upon any exercise to institute these so-called special measures, that he produce some contemporary medical evidence, and he has a month to do that now.


BENCH: Well, we have - we have to see what special measures he has in place. I mean, he already has his assistance dogs in Court     


MR HUNTER: Mmm.


BENCH:      which haven't disrupted the proceedings     


MR HUNTER: No; granted.


BENCH:      so there's been no problem there.


MR HUNTER: If it's simply that he wants additional breaks, that's - shouldn't be a difficulty.


BENCH: That - that shouldn't be a problem, but I place on the record, I think, now, and also during the proceedings, that we have been having regular breaks.


MR HUNTER: Yes; and adjourned early on the first day.


BENCH: And adjourned early on the first day. So I don't know what other special measures he - he seeks to have in place. I don't know actually, and he won't communicate with the Court, so I don't think there's much else we can do.


MR HUNTER: No, your Honour, I don't think there is.


BENCH: But I think it's - it's not going to be an easy matter even if he is - does come before the Court, but I don't want to sort of foreshadow what may happen if he's - if he     


MR HUNTER: Mmm.


BENCH:      still seeks to stand mute at the Bar Table for - for minutes at a time.


MR HUNTER: Well, hopefully, his special measures might obviate that.


[EDITORIAL: This Is Disability Discrimination as Disabled Persons Are Entitled To Be Self Reliant.]

BENCH: Well, his special measures, I would have thought, would be legal representation or a McKenzie Friend.


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH: But he doesn't seem to want to avail himself of those measures     


MR HUNTER: No.


BENCH:      particularly legal representation. McKenzie Friend is not a special measure in any event     


MR HUNTER: No.


BENCH:      or so special that - well, it - well, it's quite common, but whether he has anyone - I'm not sure he - whether he actually has someone who can sit quietly with him on that note. But, apart from that and having his assistance dogs here and regular breaks, I don't know what else he could possibly propose.


I have attached the Appeal Record Book for this appeal to the Court of Appeal.

They are attached as:



20111107NeilHansenCourtOfAppealSecondSearchableSupplementaryAppealRecordBookSARB_11.201SUPP_RB.pdf

20111024UpdatedRecordBookCompletelyTextSearchableARB_CA201_2011_11.201.pdf


As the committal hearing coram Kluck M. progressed over the three days, my degree of fatigue escalated and my concentration waned further. Between page 221 line 44 and page 374 line11, of the Appeal Record Book,Kluck M. railroaded me with 15 commands of “Ask another question”, when I was unable due to my inability to concentrate due to my brain damage, my Special Needs not being accommodated, but being forced to continue to try to concentrate, escalated my fatigue into mental exhaustion.


That was torture for me; real torture.


This is a known form of torture; causing mental fatigue, but for a person without brain damage it takes a much greater period of time to reach that point. It is a breach of my Human Rights to be tortured. It is egregious that I should be tortured in a court of law. This is abuse of a disabled person. By his omissions and or commissions, Shane Hunter of the CDPP permitted this to continue and in so doing breached his duty pursuant to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. It is relevant to consider that Shane Hunter is likely to have considered that he would have a better likelihood of having me convicted given that the Websites and I, as a Journalist and or producer on the websites., if that was the case, yet to be proven,, would have the immunity from prosecution of Qualified Privilege, as well as the fact that police person Henri Elias Rantala forced entry to my property and premises, where I had exclusive possession, when he was armed, when neither he nor anyone else had the mandatory court order and when subsequently my possessions were removed from my yard and premises without my permission, so fulfilling all the elements of the Crime of Ar4med robbery.


As to Rantala being armed, I quote from his evidence under oath, recorded on the transcript:

20100628_Day3_KluckTranscriptMagistratesCourtCommittalCarriageService.pdf

DEFENDANT: No, well, can we go back to that letter? You saw that letter, and they did not have a - and you can - can you be sure they didn’t have a Court order?   I can't recall ever seeing a Court order.


Okay. So, they didn’t have a - yeah, they didn’t have a Court order?   Not from my memory. I     


Okay. Good. So, were you armed at the time?   Performing general duties, I always am with a Glock and numerous other accoutrements. That's a standard     


Including handcuffs?   Yeah, standard equipment.


Okay. So, that's armament - you're armed?   Yes.


Shane Hunter of the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions [CDPP], in court and independently of Magistrate Kluck, discriminated against me on the basis of my disability in court on the afternoon of Friday 25th June, 2010.


He stood by mute while the magistrate advise me that the Witness statements were presumably what would be the evidence of the witnesses and that I should study it over the weekend and prepare my cross examination.


The section of the transcript I here produce is included in the attached:


20100625_Day2_KluckTranscriptMagistratesCourtCommittalCarriageService.pdf


[I apologise for the amount of transcript I have included, but most is just to put the relevant part in context. I have highlighted the more important sections with larger fonts and in red.


MR HUNTER: If the cross-examination of Mr Read is any indication, we won't finish in the six days.


BENCH: Well, that's possible and it was always going to be an issue. And - but all of your remaining witnesses are available though     


MR HUNTER: Yes.


BENCH:      till - for the next four days?


MR HUNTER: For the next four days.


BENCH: All right.


MR HUNTER: I'll undertake to have him back at - to have Mr Read back at some later time     


BENCH: Yes.


MR HUNTER:      if Mr Mathews has any further questions for him which he'll have all weekend to work out and then the following four days, particularly, after the cross-examination     


BENCH: Well     


MR HUNTER:      of Senior Sergeant Bignell who will no doubt fill in the gaps that, as has been pointed out by this witness     


BENCH: All right. Well, it's something we won't know. You're telling me now, Mr Mathews that you cannot further proceed this afternoon?


DEFENDANT: That's right, your Honour. I'm     


BENCH: All right. Now - okay. Well, thank you, Mr Read. Good. Stood down. You're not formally excused from giving evidence     ?   Yes.


     in the proceedings, so you - but that may well be the case, probably not. But you're     ?   Thank you, your Honour.


You can step down.

WITNESS STOOD DOWN

BENCH: So, what we're going to do, Mr Mathews, is     


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH:      proceed with some other witnesses on Monday.


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH: And     


DEFENDANT: Would that be Sergeant Bignell first to     


MR HUNTER: No, it'll be Mr and Mrs Dick first and     


BENCH: Mr or Mrs first?


MR HUNTER: Mrs first, Mr second, then probably Rantala and Antony, given that Rantala's a police Prosecutor now; Anthony, a police officer and then, Bignell after that.


BENCH: All right. But over the weekend, Mr Mathews, I want you to be in a position next week, on Monday, to advise the Court whether you do need Mr Read any further.


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour. Yes, your Honour.


BENCH: I want you to direct your mind     


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH:      to any further questions     


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH:      that you have for Mr Read.


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH: And also, I want you to direct your mind - you have - you have the evidence of what Mr and Mrs Dick     


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH:      are going to say     


DEFENDANT: Yes.


BENCH:      I want you to direct your mind to your cross-examination.


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH: All right.


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH: Have it in - you know, have it some - in some structure.


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH: I mean, things can happen. Witnesses can say something which will     


DEFENDANT: Yeah.


BENCH:      may lead a cross-examiner off on a different direction but the main structure of your cross-examination.


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH: Okay. I want you to do that. I want you to try and do that because no person has a right to an unending committal or an unending trial.


DEFENDANT: No, your Honour. Yeah.


BENCH: No person     


DEFENDANT: Yeah.


BENCH:      whatever the circumstances     


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH:      has that right. It's not a right. So - but you have a right to a fair hearing - a fair committal     


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour, yes.


BENCH:      with that rider that we just can't go forever. You understand that?


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour. Regarding if I call any witnesses     


BENCH: Well, look, we - we're not even close to that point and you are only required to consider that if the evidence is sufficient.


DEFENDANT: Yes but     


BENCH: You understand that?


DEFENDANT: Yes. So     


BENCH: You don't even have to think about that until all of the prosecution evidence is in and the Court decides that it's sufficient. Up to that point, you don't have to call any evidence.


DEFENDANT: But can I call evidence in this committal hearing, as opposed to if it's committed as that - then, okay, you call them in the District     


BENCH: You will have the opportunity but only if     


DEFENDANT: Yes.


BENCH:      the evidence is sufficient. Right.


DEFENDANT: But even before the Court decides, can I call witnesses?


BENCH: Well, no, you're not required to.


DEFENDANT: Yeah, but I     


BENCH: And I advise you against it.


DEFENDANT: And so, we wouldn't be able to call them? Okay.

BENCH: You're not required to, by law. Until the prosecution have established a prima facie case, you don't have to give - you don't have to say a thing.


DEFENDANT: Yeah, I know I don't have to say anything, your Honour, but - so     


BENCH: But we're a long way from that.


DEFENDANT: Yeah, I just     


BENCH: It's only when this Court decides the evidence is sufficient that     


DEFENDANT: Would I then have an opportunity to call     


BENCH: You'll have the opportunity.


DEFENDANT: Okay. That would be in - not in this Court though, would it?


BENCH: Yes, in this Court. You will have the opportunity.


DEFENDANT: So, there's - it - they're on the record, then they would then go up to the District Court if that was the case, if it was being     


BENCH: But I would have thought though that the only reason you'd want to call evidence in this Court would be to lead the Court to having heard prosecution evidence and what your evidence will be that there isn't sufficient evidence. You see?


DEFENDANT: My evidence? I     


BENCH: That's the only reason     


DEFENDANT: I won't be giving any evidence.


BENCH: No, you're not required to     


DEFENDANT: No. That's right.


BENCH:      and you don't - and you don't have to call any evidence either.


DEFENDANT: That's right. But you said "my evidence". You mean the evidence I would call.


BENCH: Sorry. I thought you were talking about yourself.


DEFENDANT: What's that?


BENCH: Giving evidence.


DEFENDANT: No, I wouldn't be giving evidence, no.


BENCH: No, you're not required to.


DEFENDANT: No, be calling other witnesses.


BENCH: And also, you're not required to call evidence.


DEFENDANT: That's right. But I mean, I'm wondering if I can call evidence.


BENCH: You can. I've just told you that.


DEFENDANT: Yeah. But only after that     


BENCH: That's right. Only after this Court decides whether the evidence is sufficient. Up to that point, you don't have to say a thing.


DEFENDANT: That's right. And I wouldn't be prevented from - I wouldn't be - I wouldn't be - said, okay, you can call them when you go to the District Court.


BENCH: Look, we're getting far ahead of ourselves here.


DEFENDANT: Okay. No. Okay. IF that's     


BENCH: I don't think I can put it any clearer than what I have.


DEFENDANT: Okay. Thanks, your Honour. So, that's fine.


BENCH: But what I want you to do over the weekend is have your - the structure of your cross-examination ready for Mr and Mrs Dick.


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH: Right. So, you're not winging it. You're not - that would help you, won't it - wouldn't it?


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour. Yes.


BENCH: To have a structure. You know what their evidence is going to be.


DEFENDANT: Yes.


BENCH: Right.


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour. I     


[KluckReiteratesInPresenceOfHunterQuoteYou have their statements dont you ]


BENCH: Because you have their statements, don't you?


DEFENDANT: Yeah, I do, yes, your Honour, yeah.

BENCH: Yes, that's basically what they're going to say.


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH: And if they say something different, well, then you can cross-examine them on it but     


DEFENDANT: And I can still cross-examine them on that too.


BENCH: But what you've got there, that is their evidence, so have your structure     


DEFENDANT: Yeah, I can cross     


BENCH:      of your cross-examination ready.


DEFENDANT: Cross-examine on that, yeah, was it?


BENCH: Yes.


DEFENDANT: Yeah.


BENCH: That's right. Although those statements won't be handed up     


DEFENDANT: No.


BENCH:      they'll give evidence. Presumably, it will be evidence consistent with their statements, right.


[Shane Hunter was there and heard this and knew it to be false and knew it would cause me problems. This is breach by omission of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. That “right?” last word was in the nature of a Question, which would have to be to Hunter who knew the contents of the statements and what their evidence would be, and not a Question to me as I did not know what their evidence would be. It is questionable that if this was a “hand-up" committal, different appropriate statements would be been prepared.]


DEFENDANT: That's right, yeah.


BENCH: So, you will have the preview of what they're going to say. You should be able to have your cross-examination structured and that's going to save time. Right.


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH: Because time is very important.


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH: As I said     


DEFENDANT: And     


BENCH:      no person has a right to an unending committal.


DEFENDANT: Yeah, that's right, your Honour. And if it is committed, the     


BENCH: We'll worry about that then.


DEFENDANT:      transcript of this hearing     


BENCH: I'm not even going to enter into that conversation, at this point.


DEFENDANT: Where     


BENCH: If you're talking about getting a transcript before that happens     


DEFENDANT: No, not before that date. But if it is - if it is at that time     


BENCH: You'll get a transcript, yes.


DEFENDANT: Get a transcript of all     


BENCH: If you're committed, you'll get a transcript but     


DEFENDANT:      of all     


BENCH: Yes.


DEFENDANT:      committal, yes.


BENCH: Exactly. But I'm not - I'm not     


DEFENDANT: No.


BENCH:      having that conversation.


DEFENDANT: No, I'm not asking beforehand, no, no - to see what was said, no.


BENCH: Because we're a long way from that. Want to say anything else there.


MR HUNTER: No, your Honour.


[Hunter had the opportunity to advise the court and ME of the real situation re the Witness Statements. He finally admitted the truth on Monday following, after he had tried to not advise the reason that the evidence on which I was cross-examining was not just irrelevant to the charge but could not be admitted at all in evidence in chief or in cross-examination. On Monday, rather than explain Shane Hunter just objected to the evidence in cross examination so that he would not need to explain that on this Friday, he had stood by while I was being mislead with his full knowledge. His deliberate omission was a breach of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Clearly, his purpose was to disadvantage me so much more because I was disabled.]


BENCH: Okay. Mr Mathews, you're remanded to appear in this Court. It'll be the same Court     


DEFENDANT: Thank you, your Honour.


BENCH:      at 9 a.m. on the 28th of June - Monday, 28 June and your bail continues to then.


DEFENDANT: Thank you, your Honour.

THE COURT ADJOURNED



The following Monday the transcript shows, as disclosed on

20100628_Day3_KluckTranscriptMagistratesCourtCommittalCarriageService.pdf


JULIE MARIE DICK, CONTINUING:




CROSS-EXAMINATION:




DEFENDANT: Thank you, your Honour. All right. Yes, now, in your evidence-in-chief you stated you were accused of being the Judge?   Yes.


Now, is that defamatory? Is that putting you in a bad light?   But that's not who I am.


But that's not the question I asked. Is that putting you in a bad light?   No.


It's not putting you in a bad light?   No.


Okay. Fair enough. Now, you had mentioned about searches of the internet?   Mmm-hmm.


Now, you do a lot of work on the - a lot of - spend a lot of time on the internet?   The normal amount.


Well, what is a normal amount     ?   Um     


How much time do you spend on the internet please?   Maybe one or two hours a day.


Every day?   Yeah, probably, yes.


And what is involved in your internet usage?


BENCH: Relevance, Mr Mathews.


DEFENDANT: Well, this is all about internet, your Honour.


BENCH: What's the relevance though?


DEFENDANT: It's all - well, it's mentioned so often about searching the internet. I'm just     


BENCH: And how is it relevant to these proceedings, and these charges?


DEFENDANT: Well, these proceedings are alleged to do about internet websites.


BENCH: Yes. But how is it relevant to the charges?


DEFENDANT: And that it's mentioned time and time again about searching the internet, your Honour.


BENCH: Yes.


DEFENDANT: I'm - I'm just being restricted here by     



BENCH: How is it being - how is it relevant to the charges before the Court, and this     


DEFENDANT: Well, it's not because     


BENCH:      witness' evidence?


DEFENDANT:      the charges are relevant to - supposedly a website and     


BENCH: But how is it what this witness searches the internet for relevant?


DEFENDANT: Well, because she's mentioned she searched the internet wanting to find out that in context how - how that has occurred.


BENCH: That's not relevant.


DEFENDANT: Well, it's - it's relevant as to whether this client is merely - this witness is merely reacting to other people's pressure, or whether she's doing things herself; finding things herself and such.


BENCH: No.


DEFENDANT: I mean I'm - I'm just being so restricted here, your Honour.


BENCH: Well, I'm not restricting you in questioning the witness if the questions are relevant.


DEFENDANT: I mean, I would've thought, your Honour, when there's mention here of so often of searching the internet and     


BENCH: Well, she's given evidence of that.


DEFENDANT: Now, you've stated you continued to search - check the websites?


BENCH: You can answer that?   Yes. Yes, I did.


DEFENDANT: How did you do that?   I just put in Julie Marie Dick.


Mmm?   I just put in Julie Marie Dick and     


Well, explain where - where - put it in where; to the computer?   Yes.


Where into the computer?   Into Google.


Into Google?   Yeah.


Right, okay. And the Google searches. Well, okay. And so you did - that's the only way you'd check the websites?   Yes.


So you didn't actually go to the websites themselves?   Oh, yes, yes. I clicked on to put my - put my name into Google Search and then I would click on individual ones and read them.


Okay. Okay. But did you actually put in the URL of the websites?   Well, no.


BENCH: She's - look, it's quite clear what this evidence - what this witness' evidence is. You asked her if she searched. She's told you how she's searched and she clicked on the     


DEFENDANT: Okay.


BENCH:      results of the search.


DEFENDANT: And is that the only way     ?   Yes.


     you searched     ?   Yes.


     through Google?   Yes.


You don't use any other search     ?   No only Google.


Only Google. Okay. And so providing - Google didn't refer you to the site, it wouldn't matter if the site was still there?   Yes, it would bother me if the sites were still there.


How would you know?   Because you can - you just put in Julie Marie Dick and it comes up.


In Google? Yeah. But if Google didn't have it - if Google didn't refer you to the site?   Mmm.


Would it matter - would it worry you that it was still there?


MR HUNTER: Well, I'm going to object to this too.


BENCH: What     


MR HUNTER: He's talking a situation in the     


BENCH: I don’t understand the question I must     


MR HUNTER:      in the abstract for a start.


BENCH: It's a confusing question, Mr Mathews.


MR HUNTER: But the issue here is - excuse me     


DEFENDANT: Well, it's not, your Honour, I can explain    


MR HUNTER:      the issue here is that the material that was on the website between the dates in the charges are relevant. Right? He's asking a question now about would she be concerned now if the Google search didn't show up Julie Marie Dick. It's utterly irrelevant.


DEFENDANT: No, it wasn't the     


BENCH: Well, see, I don't know if that's what he's asking.


DEFENDANT:      that wasn't the question, your Honour.


BENCH: That's what I'm saying, it's a confusing question as well     


DEFENDANT: Would it be concerned     


BENCH:      as well as those other things you mentioned.


DEFENDANT:      wouldn't it have concerned you     


BENCH: Mr Mathews, don't talk over me.


DEFENDANT: Sorry. Yes, sir.


BENCH: As well as the other things Mr Hunter mentioned, but are you asking this witness if it concerns her if she does a search and Google doesn't have it there? What's the question?


DEFENDANT: Yes, yes, at that time, at that you were searching you are relying on Google.


BENCH: That's - she's answered that.


DEFENDANT: That's right. Now, Google doesn't have to have the - the - doesn't have to have every website listed on Google.


BENCH: Well, are you asking me, or the witness?


DEFENDANT: No, no, I'm     


BENCH: If you're asking the witness that's something she probably can't     


DEFENDANT:      I'm asking the witness     


BENCH:      can't answer.


DEFENDANT: I'm asking - no, and that wasn't the question. I'm asking the witness     


BENCH: Well, ask a question.


DEFENDANT:      if there - if Google didn't refer you to the website, but the website was still there.


BENCH: Do you understand that question?   No. No.


I don't either. What do you mean? Put that question in a     


DEFENDANT: If the website is still on the internet     


BENCH:      compensable form.


DEFENDANT: Well, that was, your Honour. But I     


BENCH: If it is possible.


DEFENDANT:      shall explain again - I shall explain again. The website - the website can still be on the internet, but Google doesn't have to have it     


BENCH: Look, you don't have to answer that.


DEFENDANT: Well, Google     


BENCH: That's a confusing question. Move on.


DEFENDANT: Well, your Honour, Google doesn't have to have     


BENCH: It's an improper question.


DEFENDANT: Well, your Honour, Google doesn't have to have it.


BENCH: It's an improper question.


DEFENDANT: What I'm asking is     


BENCH: It's an improper question because it's confusing.


DEFENDANT: Well, it's not confusing, your Honour, if I     


BENCH: Well, it may not be confusing to you, but to everyone else in this courtroom I suggest it is. Now     


DEFENDANT: Well, okay, well this will be on the record, your Honour that I'm - you know that     


BENCH: Yes, you told - it's all on the record.


DEFENDANT: Yeah, okay. Well, then     


BENCH: But you cannot just ask confusing questions like that and expect an answer.


DEFENDANT: Well - well, the thing is it's not confusing, your Honour. Google is merely lists some things but doesn't have to list everything.


BENCH: You can make - you can make submissions on all of this, but this witness     


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour. But I mean     


BENCH:      but this witness is here to answer questions.


DEFENDANT:      that's right, your Honour. And I mean     


BENCH: Put a question to her.


DEFENDANT: Well, I - I mean I'm being unfairly restricted, your Honour.


BENCH: It's - no, look, it seems to me that you're making submissions.


DEFENDANT: Well, I'm not.


BENCH: You can make all the submissions you like at the end of the evidence.


DEFENDANT: Yeah.


BENCH: But this witness is here to answer questions that are the answers to which are within her knowledge.


DEFENDANT: Okay. Um     


BENCH: And, I might say, relevant.


DEFENDANT: Okay. You mention hyperlinks?   Yes.


What are hyperlinks?   You open one and it goes to other ones.


How do you open one? You say you open one?   Where you click on "A" and then it takes you to "B", "C", "D" and "E", I     


Well, how else? I mean, what is that? I mean how - how - what is "A"?   If I click on a Peter Dutton one and then there's other stuff there, then you click on that and then it takes you to another site and then you click on that and it takes you to another site. I - I'm a bit confused.


On a Peter Dutton one you say     ?   No, I was just using that for as an example.


Yes. What - if - what's a Peter Dutton one?   Peter Dutton website.


BENCH: Mr Mathews?


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour?


BENCH: You are confusing this witness by your questions.


DEFENDANT: Well, I'm just simply asking what is a hyperlink, your Honour.


BENCH: Well, she's answered that.


DEFENDANT: What's "a, b and c" your Honour? I mean, that's not comprehensible.


BENCH: I took her answer to be an example of hyperlinks. There'd be a, b and c hyperlinks as an example. See, you're confusing the witness, Mr Mathews     


DEFENDANT: Well, I     


BENCH:      and I will ask you, when you cross-examine this witness, to ask relevant questions, questions that aren't confusing, questions that aren't repetitive. Now, move on.


DEFENDANT: You stated in paragraph 12, "After further searches"; they were searches by yourself were they?   Yes.


And how often did you do those searches?   Probably daily.


Daily?   Yeah.


And so, you say after a month - or some time in November or so, was it, that you said they disappeared?   Yes.


Or it was after a month from November that they disappeared. How did they disappear? What do you mean by disappear? You     ?   They were just     


In your own words, tell us how you knew they had disappeared?   'Cause I put in Julie Marie Dick and all the - the sites were gone, the photos were gone, the - everything relevant to me was gone from the web site.


From which web site? From the Google web site you're saying?   Yes. From all the web sites that we were - that I was searching.


So, there - when it came up, when you put in Julie Marie Dick, did it come up and say can't find anything?   No. The - the - some of the stuff would come up but the photos of my house and my name and my address and that had gone. Those - those were gone.


Google no longer had any reference to [indistinct]?   Well, I don't know who - who took it down     


No, no. That - those - what I'm asking you, those web sites, Google - Google web site did not refer you to any you're saying?   Yes, Google did, but when you clicked on them, my details weren't there.


Oh, I see. So, you went to the Google link?   Yes, but my details were gone.


What was there, what did you see?   There was blank squares where my house was and the word "censored" was there where my address was, and things like that. That's what I mean by gone.


"Censored" was there, was it, the word "censored" was there?   The word "censored" was there.


C-E-N-S-O-R-E-D?   Yes.


Okay. And when was this?   It would have been December, I think. December, roughly.


And that - how long did that continue for, censored?   Only - I did a search on the 31st of January and all my details, my house pictures, were back up there so, it didn't last for very long.


So, when had - prior to the 31st of January, when was the previous time you - did you do a search the day before?   I couldn't tell you.


How long before that had you done a search for Julie Marie Dick?   I don't know; it could have been a week, it could have been a day it could have been two weeks. I don't know.


Mmm-hmm. So, okay. Okay. So, now, let's - the photos had disappeared     ?   Mmm-hmm.


     and there were just squares there you're saying     ?   Yes.


     where the photos were?   Yes.


Was it similar to what we - we saw here before?   Yes.


Could we have - could we pull that screen up, please, your Honour? Go back. Go     


MR HUNTER: No, no.


DEFENDANT: Was it, like, where those squares are missing there?   Yes.


Little squares like that?   Yes.


The photos had gone?   Yes.


But the web sites were still there?   The web sites were still there, but my, yeah, my details were gone.


Okay. And where was the word "censored"?   Where 12 Leopard Court is.


Okay?   You still seen Warner 4500.


Okay. It was just Leopard Court was gone, but, okay. And you're saying this was in - prior to January 31?   Yes.


Okay. But subsequent to November?   Yes. In     


November 2008?   No, November they were there.


November - sorry?   In November they were there.


November, yes?   And then in December/January they were gone. And then I did a search on the 31st of January and the house pictures and everything were back up.


Okay. And 12 Leopard Court was there again?   Yes.


But now, could you tell me, please, when you saw the word "censored", was it in capitals, lower case, was it in     


BENCH: Look, does it matter?


DEFENDANT: Yes, it is does, your Honour.


BENCH: How relevant is that?


DEFENDANT: It's very - it matters very much as to how that was - how that came to be put there, the word "censored" came to be put there.


BENCH: Whether it's in capitals or lower case?


DEFENDANT: Whether - and whether it's in the same - or whether it's in black or whether it's in another colour or whether it has a - how it appears, its appearance is very relevant to how it got there, your Honour.


BENCH: How is it relevant?


DEFENDANT: Well, it could have been put there by any number of situations?


BENCH: What, if it's in lower case it means it's been put there by some - some person.


DEFENDANT: No, no, your Honour, but it would     


BENCH: If it's in higher case it's been put there by another person? How is it relevant?


DEFENDANT: Well, it's evidence, your Honour of what     


BENCH: Is it leading anywhere? Are you going to ask any further questions about what the - depending on the answer?


DEFENDANT: Well, the thing is that this - this - this committal hearing [indistinct] to understand what the evidence is     


BENCH: That doesn't seem relevant to me. She said it was censored. The word "censored" was there. Move on; ask another question.


DEFENDANT: Okay. So, "censored" appeared where 12 Leopard Court. Did it appear anywhere else where any other words are on this page?   Everywhere where address did, 12 Leopard Court, the word "censored" was there.


Okay. And was it anywhere else besides the word 12 Leopard Court?   No.


Just there?   Just there.


Okay. And was that image still there?   Yes. Yes. That - that one was there still.


That one was still there?   Yes.


Okay. And okay. Were any other images still there?   What do you mean, are there     


That related to you in any way?   Yeah, the - oh - no, just the - the pictures were gone, the address was censored out.


Okay?   The maps were still.


The maps were still there?   Mmm-hmm.


Was it very similar to what this one is here now?   Yes, except the 12 Leopard Court. Yes.


Okay. Was that image there of the electoral role     ?   Yes.


     what appears to be an electoral role, new search?   Yes.


That was still there, was it?   Yes.


Okay. Can we go up and see - were they - those images were still there, yes.


MR HUNTER: For the record, they were images of 73 Hawbridge Street, I think.


BENCH: Yes.


DEFENDANT: Okay. Could we go to the top of that screen now. Okay. Was that - there is a question there, "Is Judge Julie Marie Dick involved in electoral fraud?" Is that question still there, do you know?   Yes, it was.


Okay. "Is Judge Julie Marie Dick", okay. Okay. Can we just go down again please, your Honour. Okay. Okay. Now - and so, were you satisfied with that then, with the way that was?   No.


With the censored and all that?   Yeah. No, I wasn't.


You still weren't satisfied?   No.


Why were you still not satisfied?   Because I want - I wanted the whole thing 'cause my name was still there and my telephone number was still there.


Okay. So, okay now, are you aware that there is now, on the internet, a web site that refers to you as the real Julie Marie Dick and - go on?   Yes.


You are?   Yes.


Okay. And that it refers to Judge Julie Marie Dick, does it?


MR HUNTER: How is this relevant to any - to the charges?


BENCH: Have a look at the charge periods, Mr Mathews.


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour. I am     


BENCH: Are you aware of the charge periods? I read them to you.


DEFENDANT: I am, your Honour. Yes, yes, your Honour. Yes, your Honour.


BENCH: It's not     


DEFENDANT: But this is going     


BENCH: What you're asking now is not relevant to these proceedings.


DEFENDANT: It's going to the concern of this - of the witness, your Honour.


MR HUNTER: Well, perhaps I should make a     


BENCH: She's already given her concerns.


MR HUNTER: Your Honour, can I make a standing objection application at this point? Perhaps the witness can go outside?


BENCH: Will you just go outside, Mrs Dick?




WITNESS LEAVES COURTROOM




BENCH: Thanks?


MR HUNTER: As I pointed out at the outset your Honour, the offence provision effectively states that the accused is only guilty of the offence if, uses a carriage service in such a way that in all the circumstances a reasonable person would find that use menacing, harassing or offensive. It's a reasonable person test. The Court of Appeal in a case called Ogawa in September of last year considered evidence of how a "complainant" felt about the threatening content. The Court of Appeal said this, at paragraph 129 of the judgment in the judgment; I believe Keane JA said this: "For the reasons that appear below, I conclude that the evidence of Mr Connard as to the distress caused to Ms Mussett by the number of calls and the content of them was inadmissible."


BENCH: Mr Connard? Who's Mr Connard?


MR HUNTER: Now - okay. Mr Connard was the person who had some standing in the Federal Court. The threats were made to officers of the Federal Court. Ms Mussett was an employee; Mr Connard, I think - don't quote me - was her supervisor. He gave evidence that the distress caused to the complainant, effectively, by the number of calls. The Court of Appeal said "evidence of distress to the complainant" is inadmissible because it's a reasonable person test. Any questions going to how this person felt, what concerns they had, whether they were angry, is totally irrelevant to the proof of the charge in that the reasonable person test applies.


So, the cross-examination of this witness, or any other witness as to how they felt about the content, what concerns they had, is irrelevant and I object to any further questioning along those lines.


BENCH: So, the purpose of calling Mrs Dick     


MR HUNTER: Was to just put it in context as to who she is, is it her house and that's pretty much it.


BENCH: Mmm.


MR HUNTER: That she's not the Judge.


BENCH: Yes. Thank you, Mr Hunter.


DEFENDANT: Well, your Honour     


BENCH: And Mr Mathews, you have asked her questions about how she felt.


DEFENDANT: Your Honour, the point is     


BENCH: And I've allowed you to do that     


DEFENDANT: The point is, your Honour     


BENCH:      because under cross-examination I felt it was a proper question.


DEFENDANT: If I could say, your Honour, please?


BENCH: If you'd just listen to me.


DEFENDANT: Yes, your Honour.


BENCH: So, I've allowed you some latitude with that. But what you're doing now is simply, you're wasting the Court's time by staying outside the parameters of the charges; July '08 to July '09 is charge 1; August '06 and July '09 charge 2; February '07 and July '09 charge 3; June 09 and July '09 for charge 4. Asking the witness what the situation today is, is irrelevant.


DEFENDANT: Your Honour, if I     


BENCH: Yes?


DEFENDANT: Okay. All the evidence in the statement of witnesses     


BENCH: Yes?


DEFENDANT:      is related to how the felt.


BENCH: Yes.


DEFENDANT: It's all about how they felt     


BENCH: All right.


DEFENDANT:      and     


BENCH: And I've allowed you to ask the witness how she felt.


DEFENDANT: Well, the reason I'm suspecting that this is all how they felt in here is it's going to be led to the jury that this person isn't possibly a reasonable person, you see, and that this is     


BENCH: No. No.


DEFENDANT:      [indistinct]. But     


BENCH: No, no, no. That's not     


DEFENDANT: Okay. Well now, if we go to     


BENCH: It won't be the case. As Mr Hunter has clearly pointed out to you in the latest Court of Appeal decision.


MR HUNTER: And as your Honour may have noted, I didn't ask a single question about how she felt in     


[This confirms that Hunter was very much aware of the limited evidence that could be admitted. He knew those witness statements would cause me detriment.]


BENCH: No.


MR HUNTER:      evidence-in-chief. The statement was put together by a State police officer who was also looking at stalking charges which may explain why that content's there, but that's not     


BENCH: But     


MR HUNTER:      what's being proceeded with.


BENCH:      all I'm simply saying is, if the witness is called and to be cross-examined, I think that is an obvious question that they're going to he asked, and I've allowed it     


DEFENDANT: Mmm.


BENCH:      and she's answered it.


DEFENDANT: Yeah.


BENCH: So, I'm     


DEFENDANT: Well     


BENCH: And you're not going to ask her any more questions about how she felt, are you?


DEFENDANT: No, well, that's - that's fine, your Honour, if, you know, I mean     


BENCH: And you're not going to ask her any more questions about the present situation of the web site because that's not relevant.


What is relevant, your Honour, if I can - well, now the witness is not here. What is relevant is the fact that these - these people have been kept on tap and kept on     


BENCH: We're talking about this witness.


DEFENDANT: Yeah, the     


BENCH: This witness.


DEFENDANT: This witness and her husband. Obviously, her husband is     


BENCH: Yes.


DEFENDANT:      is a motivator.


BENCH: Who will be called.


DEFENDANT: He'll be called. That's right.


BENCH: Yes.


DEFENDANT: Obviously, the husband is a motivator and he     


BENCH: Well, look, you can't say that. You can ask him that but you can't - you can't make that submission.


DEFENDANT: Well, the thing is, your Honour, that     


BENCH: There's no evidence before the Court as to that, but     


DEFENDANT: Well, the thing is that is getting to how he felt.


BENCH: And - and I might add, it goes back to the point that Mr Hunter raised, that it's the reasonable person test.


DEFENDANT: That's right     


BENCH: It doesn't matter.


DEFENDANT: That's - but it's     


BENCH: It doesn't matter what the - what the witnesses think.


DEFENDANT: Well, that's right, your Honour, but the - the reason these witnesses are - are here is because the police have kept them on tap. As Mr Hunter has suggested, the previous officer was looking at maybe stalking charges so, he was trying to get the evidence up on stalking. They were looking at any way they could attack - attack me.


BENCH: I'm not going to allow you to ask questions that aren't relevant to these proceedings.


DEFENDANT: Well, the thing is why - the motivation of the - of the person to become a witness your Honour     


BENCH: But you've asked her all these questions.


DEFENDANT: Yeah, yeah. What I'm - yeah, I'm explaining - I'm explaining why     


BENCH: You've asked her. You've asked this witness those questions     


DEFENDANT: Okay. But the thing is     


BENCH:      and I've allowed you to do it.


DEFENDANT:      her husband's going to be coming on the witness - in the witness box, your Honour, and he is a motivator to all this and the reason that they are witnesses is because they're wanting their day in Court. As they say, they want - they want content removed and such like this. And they didn't make any effort to do it because the police were

pumping them to say, "Well, look, no you won't be able to get the stuff removed but leave it up to us, we'll get everything"     


BENCH: I'm going to ask you to sit down now and I'm going to recall the witness.


DEFENDANT: Thank you, your Honour.


BENCH: And I'm going to ask you to ask relevant questions that aren't confusing, annoying and repetitive, and relevant. Thank you.




JULIE MARIE DICK, CONTINUING:




CROSS-EXAMINATION:




BENCH: Yes, Ms Dick, thank you. Mr Mathews, do you have any further questions for this witness?







BENCH: If you don't, I'll excuse her.


DEFENDANT: Um     it takes me a while to work things out, your Honour. And     


BENCH: Well, we haven't got all day.


DEFENDANT: No, your Honour, but in light of what Mr Hunter's just said, I probably need a 10 minute recess to     


BENCH: No, I'm not giving you any - we've just had a break. We've come back.


DEFENDANT: Oh, how long ago, your Honour?


BENCH: Not long.


DEFENDANT: Came back an hour ago.


BENCH: No, we didn't.


DEFENDANT: Yep.


BENCH: You mustn't have any more questions?


DEFENDANT: Well, as I noted, your Honour, that my condition     


BENCH: Well     


DEFENDANT: Is your phone number an unlisted number?   No.


No, it's not? Have you ever received phone calls directed to Judge Julie Dick?   No.


Have you ever received mail for a Judge Julie Marie Dick?   Yes.


You have received mail?   Yes.


At that address, for Judge Julie Marie Dick?   Yes.


When was that?   Just recently, probably a month ago.


A month ago?   Yep.


And what did you do with it?   I just put, "Not at this address, return to sender."


Okay. Did it have any indication of who the sender was, on it?   It had a Scouts sticker on it. The envelope was from Scouts.


From the Scouts?   Yeah.


Okay. And it was addressed to Judge, was it?   Judge Julie Marie Dick. Yes.


Was on the envelope?   Yes.


So you did not open it?   No.


Okay, good. I'm at a bit of a loss now, your Honour, because I did not know that these statements were not the statements of the witnesses, for these charges.


BENCH: You did not know that the statements of the witnesses     


DEFENDANT: Of the witnesses were statements for these charges. These statements were for the witnesses in relation to other charges, as Mr Hunter's just said.


MR HUNTER: No, that's not what I said, at all. And perhaps I should clarify that. The police were conducting investigations. They were broad ranging investigations, they included the charges now before the Court, and any other offence, including stalking, including any offence which might have been raised. These statements were taken before any charges were laid; they were simply a statement taken to exhaust the memory, or at least cover as much material as possible, with each witness, with a view to perhaps using them down the track. No decision had been made in February of 2009, as to the nature of the charges. That's what I said. That's what I meant.


DEFENDANT: So, your Honour, these - we were not prepared for these charges.


BENCH: Well, you've just heard what Mr Hunter said.



20050601MagistrateCourtTranscriptFraudWalterHarveyEhrichJohnPedenPrasleyVPraser0000_tn.pdf

20050812DecisionJusticeMargaretWhiteRepleadBrisbaneCityCouncilBS4337_2005_QSC05-222.pdf

20060209BrisbaneCityCouncil_v_RussellGordonHaigMathews2006QSC025BS729_06_FrybergJ_VexatiousLitigantOrderQSC06-025.pdf

20100730CourtOfAppealDecisionEvilEgregiousEhrichQCA196-RvMathews.pdf


I took action in the District Court of Queensland:

For the decision and Order See pages 660 to 664 of

20111024UpdatedRecordBookCompletelyTextSearchableARB_CA201_2011_11.201.pdf

For Court of Appeal see attached:

20111213CourtOfAppealDecisionMathews_v_CommissionerofPolice2011QCA368_QCA11-368.pdf

My application for Special Leave to Appeal to the High Court was dismissed, and see attached:

20120510HighCourtB1_2012DecisionDismissApplicationSpecialLeaveToAppealJJHayneCrennan0001.JPG

20120510HighCourtB1_2012DecisionDismissApplicationSpecialLeaveToAppealJJHayneCrennan.pdf

The effect of the decision of all courts including the High Court, is that the CDPP is entitled to torture me and/or participate in a process where they know I am being tortured, in a committal hearing where my special Needs are not accommodated with Special Measures, and there is nothing I can do about it, until maybe later after the mental torture has occurred and when I have been denied Due Process of a Fair Hearing.


I have been subjected to this government fraud and corruption for nearly 40 years. It has been getting worse throughout. The executive of the Commonwealth is now involved so triggering the Optional Protocol to the Convention the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The government staff have found me such an easy target in the past, I have no reason to believe they will cease any time soon.


In particular, I refer you to the first three items on page 12 of

20091102BriefEvidenceReUseOfCarriageService.pdf   

[which is now reproduced:]  [I am including this here as I will be referring elsewhere back to this in respect of the Magistrate Marshall Davies who  disqualified my driver's licence for 3 months.  Because of all the incidents against me since, by the Qld police and the "judiciary", I intend to "get ot the real cause" of all the corruption I have suffered at the hands of the corrupt police, public sector and judiciary.].

http://HaigReport.com/images/20090909PoliceRecordRussellMathewsDangerousDriving_Cr01NoDoB.JPG

a record of my court appearances. I was being attacked and menaced by two people. For protection, I left the scene, as I left one caused an incident. She said, on the record, “as the car moved past me, I reached into the vehicle to try to take the ignition keys. I ran along beside but he would not stop and I fell over and hurt myself.” As result the police charged me with “Dangerous Driving” to wit: that I drove away from a standing position knowing that someone was attached to my car such that the person suffered injury. Clearly, I won that on appeal. The police realised that they had no case so they charged me with a second offence of “leaving the scene of an accident” even before the first charge of Dangerous Driving was heard in the District Court.


In fact, on the evidence of the complainant, she should have been charged with "attempting to interfere with the mechanism of a moving vehicle". She was not charged. I had been threatened and abused by the two prior to this incident. They knew who I was as we had contracted business. About one hour later at home I received a “Death Threat” of “you're dead meat”. The ground surface was just dirt. It was not bitumen nor concrete nor roadbase.


This is just one of the incidents where I have been treated like a pariah by Queensland police, Government commissions, departments and courts. I suspect that the police have me as a marked man because I am disabled.


On that occasion, the judge in the District Court should have summarily dismissed the charge as the evidence was in stark contrast to the charge. I was put through that trouble and expense by the police and the judge, just to harm me because I am disabled.


After my win in the Appeal, I was convicted by then Townsville magistrate named Marshall Davies, although clearly I was innocent. The solicitor who represented me was John Nehmer. He is now deceased but was at that time, a senior solicitor in Townsville. He appeared with me before the magistrate although that was unusual for him being such a Senior Solicitor, but because of the circumstances he himself appeared coram the Magistrate . He realized how I was being treated unfairly by the police. John Nehmer said to me afterwards that the magistrate was sitting on the edge of is seat so eager to find any reason to convict me.

My contention is that the committal hearing coram Kluck M. became a nullity, ultra vires before the end of the third day on 28th June, 2010, due to the denial of Due Process; of my having a Fair Hearing, including by Shane Hunter, the prosecutor for the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, a part of the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia. Shane Hunter is not an automaton but has free will and should not have been willingly a party to the abuse of my Human Rights.


My contention is further that that was a relevant consideration for any court considering any appeal on any aspect of the hearing was concerned, as the CDPP, Shane Hunter was a party to that purported hearing which was also a nullity. Hence no court had power to confirm the orders from Magistrate Kluck. I contend that no subsequent court could ignore the reality that the Committal was a nullity void ab initio, for denial of Natural Justice.




See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
PHPincludes/includedWrittenByRussellMathews.php
Web-site, Written, Coded, Produced and Directed by
Russell G H Mathews
BCom BSc LLB BA

International Disability Rights Advocate
invoking
UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
& UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Image
CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE

View list of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards
Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html



 Menu: Corrupt Qld Judiciary: Favours Untouchable Banks FRAUD; What is Chief Justice of Supreme Court of Qld, Paul deJersey doing?

/PHPincludesCorruptQldJudiciary/includedMenuCorruptQldJudiciary.php

Menu: Corrupt Qld Judiciary: Chief Justice Paul de Jersey

Publications by John Alfred SALMON: retired Bank Manager, [for NAB].

  1. THE UNTOUCHABLE BANKS: An exposé of banking process and legal deception; by John A Salmon
  2. Problems Experienced by Bank Litigants in the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Queensland



 HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:


See: the Menu: for HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD:

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld: The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ:

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
PHPincludesProofSappideenWalkerLister/includedOverviewMultipleUniversityQueenslandDouglasPorterFrauds.php

Overview, Synopsis, or Summary of Public Sector Parasites Bullying specifically The University of Queensland & its previous registrar [for 22 years], Douglas Porter:

When one has a great amount of factual material to relate, one has to organize it so the reader can enter the narrative.  With the internet and Google and other search engines, that is unlikely to be at the "beginning", [if there is such a thing as a "beginning"].  Basically, what I have to do is to have various levels of narrative.  One level needs to have all the facts connected in detail.  No group of facts is a closed group, but rather, facts or aspects of one group of facts, relate to, or are identical to, facts or aspects of other groups.  As well, the reader/visitor does not want to read everything ever written.  Hence I need to have various levels of summary.  One level of summary will summarize the detailed facts.  Above that, is another level of summary that will summarize a number of summaries, according to common factors or relationships, in the level below.  Sometimes, when writing the detailed facts level, another aspect, or one or more of those facts, may require a detailed analysis.   Of course, the factual situation can be viewed from a number of perspectives.  Thankfully, Google et al, will index all of those.

Menus will tend to serve that role of a summary, but merely one summary or overview..  This text could be viewed as a Menu in a narrative.  This section will link to the various parts of our websites that are referenced from here.

There are basically FOUR episodes where the University of Queensland has cheated, defrauded and discriminated against me because I am disabled.  There exists a great amount of overlap between the episodes.  Of course, the outcome of each was that I was cheated and defrauded badly.   These facts I relate reflect badly upon The University of Queensland administration and Douglas Porter in particular.

Chronologically, from 1992 four main episodes are, the Law School, in 1993, 1994 and 1995 at least, the maths department and the EPSA faculty in particular Andrew Lister in 1997 to 2001, at least, then in 2003 - 2006 the dumb femi-nazi "Queen" Janine Schmidt was "chief" librarian at UQ attacked, defrauded and discriminated against me because I was disabled.   The Criminal culminating fraud by Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland was Porter's secretly orchestrating the defrauding me of my home, for the benefit of the University of Queensland and the UQ college called St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of UQ, when Porter was secretly  the Chair of the Council that ran St Johns College.

I am a mathematician.  My greatest skills are in maths.  I guess that could be because I have always had a writing disability, undiagnosed until circa 1993.  In school, all my written work was poorly written.  Hence, as teachers who mark work, see it as a chore and tedious job to be finished as quickly as possible, judge a work by how it looks or feels to them, and gives a subjective mark.  With maths, the teachers would see the correct answer, the correct diagrams so I would receive full marks, regularly.

I returned to The University of Queensland [UQ] in 1991 doing maths.  I did well. At that time, I had hassles with public sector parasites, lying parasites and police so decided to study law at UQ.  That began the episode of repeated occasions of my being attacked, cheated and defrauded by the law school by particular individuals within the law school and within the administration of The University of Queensland.   The University of Queensland was vicariously liable for that.  The next major episode occurred with the Maths department part of the Engineering, Physical science & Architecture "Super" faculty under the Executive Dean Andrew Lister.

Fraud by Douglas Porter, The University of Queensland, [part of the Australian Government], by defrauding a disabled reclusive old man of his HOUSE & LAND; including Douglas Porter's being linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity

These pages will be developed to expose the defrauding of a disabled, and hence reclusive old man of his house and land at 254 Hawken Drive St Lucia [view MAP] by Douglas Porter, the previous Registrar of The University of Queensland, for use by The University of Queensland.  Douglas Porter had been attacking, bullying and discriminating against this disabled reclusive old man since the early 1990s when he was a mature age student at The University of Queensland.

Porter was closely associated with two others linked to the Attempted MURDER of the disabled old man, being the then recent law lecturers Quentin Bryce, and Patsy Mary Wolfe.  The disabled old man was, at that time, a student of law at the University of Queensland, where Porter was Registrar.  Porter was engaged in bullying 
the disabled old man prior to the Attempted Murder of the disabled old man, and subsequenly, but then with greater  gusto.   Douglas Porter, then, as clandstine Chair of the St Johns College Council, that ran the St Johns College on the St Lucia, Brisbane Campus of The University of Queensland, began to secretly orchestrate the theft of the home of the disabled old man; the house and land owned in trust by the disabled old man, to take advantage of the fact that the disabled old man was under a strident attack..  

LinkToAspinallInPorterPanel.php This Profile Panel re the parasitic Douglas Porter, rewarded by the anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall and the anglican church, because Porter used confidential information obtained as Registrar of The University of Queensland, to assist Phillip Aspinall steal the home of a vulnerable disabled guy links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud of this vulnerable disabled guy by anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall.

  Douglas PORTER is linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity.
See fat pig parasite Porter playing with himself

  masturbating

in his office. So, what can you expect from The University of Queensland?
Write and tell us what you think about this University.
  Douglas Porter taken at 9:55AM 12th July, 2006 in his office at The University of Queensland where he was at that time, Registrar of The University of Queensland, and also clandestinely, the Representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly Chairman of, the St Johns College Council which runs St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland.  For years prior and years since then, Porter was secretly scheming to steal my home, beneficially owned by me, from me, by threatening and manipulating the emotionally challenged emotional shell of the trustee.

Concurrently, while I was then a student at the Universiity of Queensland, Douglas Porter, as Registrar, repeatedly discriminated against me in relation to my use of the libraries and my being accompanied by my two wee assistance dogs while on the campus of UQ.

Just days before the armed robbery on me on 29th November, 2004, by corrupt cop [and Armed Robber] at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, as a preliminary and integral step towards stealing my property [my home, my beneficially owned house and land], from me, all orchestrated by Douglas Porter, Douglas Porter had that same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala charge me with bogus criminal charges. No doubt this was intended to complicate my life even more than my life was being complicated, on top of my disabilities, by all the Douglas Porter inspired disability discrimination of me in UQ libraries, so making the theft of my home even easier for The University of Queensland.


We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this intellectual lightweight and corrupt gutless parasite .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 .   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 . 

Douglas Porter was The University of Queensland's SECRETIVE/CLANDESTINE representative, [and Chair], on the Governing body of one college, St Johns College at the University of Queensland - [see 7th paragraph of this linked UQ publication] or our copy.   [Of course, The University of Queensland has complete control of that land on which the college is built, with its complicated legal arrangement.]  The Governing body is called the the St Johns College Council [SJCC] and Douglas Porter is the Chair of the SJCC. Important in the workings of St Johns College and the St Johns College Council, is the SJCC Budget.  The Warden of St Johns College is the fraudster the Rev John Morgan.  He is answerable to the SJCC for the running of SJC.  In particular, he is petrified of his spending being in excess of the SJCC budget.  He even attempts to defraud to avoid spending money that is not in the SJCC budget.  Earlier that year, Morgan admitted lying to me the previous year, so that he would not have to face up to the St Johns College Council [SJCC], for having spent money that he was legally required to spend, that was, however, not in the SJCC budget.  

Hence, SJCC is a part of the Australian Government Sector, as is The University of Queensland.  Also involved in this fraud were other divisions of the Australian Public Sector, namely the Brisbane City Council, Queensland Police [including the most senior level, on the evidence of the Queensland Police], Queensland Courts especially Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and Supreme Court Judge Henry George Fryberg. Others were involved for the money they would make from it and to be "on the in" with corrupt public sector parasites.  These include lawyer Stephen Tonge, [view home of Tonge on MAP]  then a partner of Firm of lawyers Flower & Hart but more recently of Tress Cox.  Some Capital Funding was provided by the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church aka the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Paul de Jersey, is the Chancellor of the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC].  They provided the funding for an expected return [albeit fraudulent] of approximately 20% year on year plus a locked in Capital Gain well in excess of CPI indexation.

Because the Australian Government has been involved in defrauding this disabled reclusive old man, this matter, and his being defrauded of his Commonwealth Disability Support Pension by Centrelink, will end up coram/before UN committees in Geneva pursuant to Australia's acceding to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.   The Corrupt Australian Government and all parts of it involved in this widespread fraud should be greatly shamed and we will expose them.

The Queensland Court of Appeal, the highest court in Queensland, has recently spoken on this matter.  [It was written up in the Brisbane newspaper as "Talk of the Legal World".], However, there is far more to come.

includedSummaryCaseFraudPoliceAndCDPP.php

Summary of the case by the Criminal, corrupt & FRAUDULENT Qld police AGAINST Disabled Old Man

This is the case where corrupt police and a corrupt Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, attempt to use brute force, of police arrest and harassment to silence the disabled old man, to conceal how the Queensland police performed an Armed Robbery on him to Assist the Queensland Government defraud the disabled old man of his house and land that he owned and which was his home.

The disabled old man has brain damage caused by severe head injury when a teenager.  That affects his ability to "work" for any but short time periods.  He is able to concentrate for only short periods. This is near impossible for a casual observer to notice.  He quickly becomes fatigued and if he is forced to continue to try to concentrate, that results in mental exhaustion.  On the first day of hearing, knowing the disabled old man's disability and the nature of it, Magistrate Klutz ridiculed the disabled old man, even though the disabled old man was trying hard to accommodate what the Magistrate desired.   CLEARLY, THE DISABLED OLD MAN MUST REFUSE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS, UNLESS AND UNTIL HIS SPECIAL NEEDS CONSEQUENT UPON HIS DISABILITIES ARE FULLY ACCOMMODATED.   THIS IS ESSENTIAL IF HE IS TO RECEIVE DUE PROCESS.  THE ONUS IS UPON THE MAGISTRATE, JUDGE AND DECISION MAKER, TO ENSURE THAT THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS EXTENDED DUE PROCESS aka NATURAL JUSTICE.

THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS HAPPY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS PROVIDED HE RECEIVES DUE PROCESS. 

The real crux of this fraud upon the disabled old man and concurrently, UPON THE JUSTICE AND LEGAL SYSTEM OF QUEENSLAND AND AUSTRALIA, is that this disabled old man is being prosecuted in the most contemptuous way, to continue the EXPLOITATION OF HIS BEING DISABLED BY THE QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT, in that the Queensland Government, defrauded/stole from the disabled old man, the house and land that he owned that was his home, for the use of and by The University of Queensland.  The clandestine fraud was orchestrated by the Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  The fraud involved an ARMED ROBBERY of the disabled old man by Queensland Police in company with a Queensland government Authority, for the benefit of another Queensland Government authority viz, The University of Queensland. The case involved a fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man. The same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala also charged the disabled old man with other charges to favour The University of Queensland, who had been defrauding the disabled old man for years.  ..

Instead of the Australian government doing as it should to honour its International Commitments [
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]] to rail against exploitation of disabled persons, it is actually perpetuating, ITSELF, the exploitation of this disabled old man, because no doubt, the exploitation of the disabled old man was by the Queensland Government, and a number of parts of the Queensland Government in collusion.

This fraud of the disabled old man was orchestrated by Queensland Public Sector Parasite, Douglas Porter, when he was Registrar of The University of Queensland, for the benefit of The University of Queensland and to punish the disabled old man for standing up for his rights as a Disabled person, while at The University of Queensland.  Involved in the Porter perpetrated fraud was an ARMED ROBBERY by the Queensland Government being the Queensland police in particular corrupt cops Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony, of the disabled old man at his home together with a concurrent fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man by the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala.

The law confirms that the Armed Robbery by Henri EliasRantala and Monica Louise Antony, was actually a CRIMINAL
armed robbery. The factual evidence is also online.  The conduct constituting the armed robbery was not just accidental.   The perpetrators of the fraud, Queensland Public Sector parasites, set out to create what they expected would be an arguable case TO JUSTIFY THE "ARMED ROBBERY" as just part of their normal operations.    They created a RUSE for just that reasonHowever, the silly bitch lawyer Joanne Whiting, did not know what she was doing, so clearly the Ruse was hatched by one of her superiors.

That fact then begs the question of the purpose of that
RUSE and armed robbery, and exposes the perpetrators of the defrauding of the disabled old man of his home.  Because the Queensland Government perpetrated the fraud of the disabled old man of his home, his house and land, the Queensland government wants it concealed.  Therefore, the conduct of prosecuting the disabled old man is criminal and makes the perpetrated an accessory to the fraud.  The evidence giving those prosecuting the disabled old man a "guilty mind" is all that evidence on that webpage.  Those involved now in "prosecuting" the disabled old man  are criminal. 

While the corrupt parasite Shane Hunter, a prosecutor from the Commonwealth DPP, had the knowledge that the corrupt police Rantala and Antony did commit an armed robbery, he cannot be prosecuted as he has "advocates' immunity".  However, none of the others involved in the process of prosecuting the Disabled Old Man have immunity.  Corrupt ex-cop [now 'working' for KPMG] Brendan Scott Read had put another "prosecutor" from the CDPP right into the frame, by admitting they colluded to bring the false charges against the disabled old man, but that prosecutor was not an advocate in this matter, so does not have
advocates' immunity.  That other parasite from the CDPP is named Anthony Gett.  Corrupt ex-cop Brendan Scott Read also does not have immunity from prosecution for being an accessory to the Armed Robbery and to the defrauding the disabled old man of his house and land, worth in the order of $1million.  Of course, we will be assisting the disabled old man to gain many more similar house and land properties in the area from the Fraudsters.  This will include the house of the defrauding lawyer who did the transfer of the title with full knowledge of the fraud.  His name is Stephen Tonge.  The Queensland Government, both the Queensland Public Sector university, The University of Queensland, and the Queensland Government of Anna Bligh proper,  will be up for the majority of the damages.  This all arose because the disabled old man IS disabled.  It was thought by the public sector parasites, with UQ Registrar Douglas Porter, as the lead criminal in the box seat driving the fraud of the disabled old man, that the disabled old man was ripe for exploitation, because he is permanently disabled.  Now, the Commonwealth of Australia, in the person of the corrupt Commonwealth DPP prosecutor Shane R. Hunter, has joined the fray exploiting the disabled old man.  This in in stark contravention of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The parasitic Federal labor government acceded to the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities  on 21st August, 2009.

Because all the police involved in the prosecution of the disabled old man, are presumed to know the detail of the evidence proving the armed robbery because the evidence and legal reason is in the Public Domain, online and it would be reasonable to presume that police would check its validity, and we know the evidence is 100% genuine, then all the police including the police solicitor Paxton Booth are put in the frame by the evidence of Brendan Scott Read.  The other police aware of the criminal conduct in which they were engaged included  Detective Sergeant Steven Bignall, Detective Senior Constables Gavin Hackett and Detective Senior Constable Dave Graham.  Each of these has been engaged in a criminal activity.  This amounts to 

Because parasitic fraudster Shane Hunter of the CDPP was prepared to prosecute these charges, when he knew the evidence proved that police Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony committed an Armed Robbery, suggests that he expected a win, meaning that he knew the Magistrates Court, and possibly the District Court are corrupt, like as displayed, maybe by Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and District Court Judge Leanne Clare.  that .d ..


This case now has a high profile International dimension.  Australia has ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD].  Importantly, the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia has, on 21st August, 2009 acceded to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [OP].  As shyster Shane Hunter is a Commonwealth Public Servant within the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, a Commonwealth Agency, a part of the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, he and it are subject to the OP.  As the disabled old man has already suffered extensive discrimination, and fraud, at the hands of Shyster Shane Hunter, breach of the CRPD has already occurred and hence, pursuant to the OP, formal complaint can be made to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Geneva, Switzerland, once all domestic Australian remedies have been exhausted, or effectively exhausted.

The summary for each day will be a Menu of the anchors [or markers/tags] placed in the Transcript of this day.  It will be effectively a Summary of the discussion between the Magistrate Paul M Kluck [the Klutz] and Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, [who knows the evidence that  proves the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala did in fact commit an armed robbery because no-one had authority to enter exclusively possessed land, on that occasion; they needed a court order but did not have one].  The disabled old man did not appear in the committal hearing coram Kluck, after 28th June, as he had become ill from the constant barrage of harassment and jibes aimed at his disabilities, and attacks upon his weaknesses caused by his disabilities, from the Magistrate Kluck the Klutz and from the Commonwealth Government lawyer fraudster Shane Hunter.  Of course, neither need worry as Magistrate Klutz has Judicial Immunity and shyster Shane Hunter who knows he is assisting a crime perpetrated by the Government against a disabled citizen, including EXPLOITATION of the DISABLED, to remain concealed, has Advocates' Immunity.  In Kluck's court, Due Process was abrogated, because the disabled old man had Special Needs that were not accommodated by Paul M Kluck. Hence, from that moment, Kluck's court became a nullity. Thus, from then, the disabled old man was denied Due Process.  Read on the transcript, how Magistrate Kluck ridiculed the disabled old man.

At the time of committing the Armed Robbery of the disabled old man, Henri Elias Rantala illegally arrested the disabled old man so as to keep him from his home while his home was ransacked and his yard was cleared of all of his possession to order of the Queensland Government, who wished to take control of his property in quick time, for The University of Queensland to use.  This was orchestrated by the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  Well, on 20th July, 2010, 22 days after the last day that the disabled old man tried to perform in the committal hearing, on 28th June, 2010, the Queensland Court of Appeal gave it decision regarding that illegal arrest on that day of the disabled old man by parasite cop Rantala.  In clear dicta the Court of Appeal raised the spectre of the gross criminality involved in the whole matter

This day's transcript is one continuous file/page.  These anchors when listed will be listed in sequence.
The three days when witnesses have actually given evidence have been similarly summarised with "anchors" [aka markers/tags], and each appears thus:
  1. Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  2. Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  3. Day 3: 28th June, 2010
This case has international consequences, as this action by the Commonwealth Prosecutor, given that the disabled old man has been thrown out of his home by a corrupt judicial system of the magistrates and District Courts, is a disgusting reflection upon the judicial principle of Due Process, for any country in the world. This will make Australia the laughing stock of the international justice community.  So much more so as all this has been done with the full knowledge of the Australian Attorney General, Robert McClelland.

RussellMathewsEmailSignatureDRA

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
International Disability Rights Advocate
invoking
UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
& UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
See my RESOUNDING VICTORY 20th July, 2010 in
Qld Court of Appeal

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of
      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND
Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]

PHPincludesPlagiocephaly/includedSeeMenuNewPlagiocephalyLinks.php

SEE:  Overview of multiple criminal frauds of me by Douglas Porter & The University of Queensland:



 Menu: Chief Justice Paul deJersey _v_ Court of Appeal President Margaret McMurdo; Judicial War Supreme Court of Qld


Menu: HaigReport's Chief Justice Paul deJersey _v_ Court of Appeal President Margaret McMurdo; Judicial War Supreme Court of Qld:


  1. Index: Chief Justice Paul deJersey _v_ Court of Appeal President Margaret McMurdo; Judicial War Supreme Court of Qld:
  2. Who Had Magistrate Topsy-Turvy Wally Walter Harvey Ehrich Conceal Paul deJersey Corporation Synod Diocese Brisbane Armed Robbery:


 Menu: Corporations ON NOTICE! Russell Mathews' Corporate Governance Shareholder DECREE


Menu: HaigReport's Corporations ON NOTICE! Russell Mathews' Corporate Governance Shareholder DECREE:


  1. Index: Corporations ON NOTICE! Russell Mathews' Corporate Governance Shareholder DECREE:



 Menu: Woolworths/BigW: The Experience by a disabled customer, of Woolworth's BULLYING & BigW's MISLEADING & DECEPTIVE CONDUCT


Menu: HaigReport's Woolworths/BigW: The Experience by a disabled customer, of Woolworth's BULLYING & BigW's MISLEADING & DECEPTIVE CONDUCT :


  1. Index: Woolworth's Bullying Disabled Customers; BigW's Smart Arse Manager & Misleading & Deceptive Conduct:
  2. Hear Two Big W Smart Arses being Smart Arses: Everett McMillan, Store Manager, Big W, Garden City Mt Gravatt; & Nathan at Big W Online:
  3. Who is Woolworths Big W, Smart Arse Manager Everett McMillan?:
  4. How this matter may be developed by me: Stand for Election as a Non-Executive Director of Woolworths Ltd & more:
  5. Woolworths BigW Store Manager Everett McMillan Violates Woolworths Fanciful Code Of Conduct; So What Should His Staff Do:
  6. Disability Discrimination By Woolworths BigW Store Manager Everett McMillan, BigW Garden City, Mt Gravatt, Brisbane:
  7. OPEN LETTER: Boards of Directors & Management, Woolworths Ltd: Complacent Breach Consumer Law Abuse Patronize Ridicule Customers:
  8. ATTN: Woolworths Shareholders: Woolworths & BigW Train Managers TO Bully, Cheat, Argue & Belittle Disabled Customers:
  9. OPEN LETTER Julie Coates Director of BIG W & Grant O'Brien Managing Director and CEO, Woolworths Ltd:

  10. 7th May, 2012 OPEN LETTER Grant O’Brien Managing Director & CEO Woolworths:
includedMenuPriorWoolworthsBigW.php

This is the Menu regarding Disability Discrimination by Woolworths of a Disabled Old Man with two wee Assistance Dogs:

  1. * Webletter dated 8th January, 2007 re FIRST Woolworths ATTACK and unlawful Disability discrimination.
  2. * my_PSP email_to_Woolworths_dated_8th January, 2007 advising of web-letter URL
  3. * WOOLWORTHS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of email of 8th January,2007.
  4. * WebReport dated 27th October, 2007 re SECOND Woolworths ATTACK and unlawful Disability discrimination.
  5. * my_PSP email_to_Woolworths_dated_27th October, 2007 advising of web-letter URL
  6. * WOOLWORTHS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of email of 27th October, 2007.
  7. * Email thread start 1st November, 2007, of Russell Mathews and Woolworths
  8. * Woolworths email of 2nd November, 2007 requesting repeat advice of URL.
  9. * Reference to earlier ATTACK by Woolworths.
  10. * Our LEGAL ASSESSMENT of the INCOMPETENT CLAYTON UTZ REPORT.
  11. * The INCOMPETENT CLAYTON UTZ REPORT






Menu: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:


  1. Index: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial::

  2. Considerations: How To Do It: Procedure To Follow: Advice, From High Court Registry::
  3. High Court of Australia Fees, Charges, For Application for Special Leave To Appeal: CASH::
  4. Documents: Proforma; Examples; Actual; Completed: Application for Special Leave To Appeal; AccompanyingDocuments; Draft Notice Of Appeal; Summary Of Argument::
  5. Ridiculous Pedantics: High Court Registry Fail Logic::
  6. My Form 23: My Application For Special Leave To Appeal, High Court of Australia::
  7. My Form 24: Draft Notice Of Appeal; High Court Australia:
  8. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry deemed defective, deemed not comply with High Court Rules, deemed Attachment as 'entire Document':
  9. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry found okay as I cropped a bit more image:
  10. My Form XX: Affidavit Of Service on Respondent in High Court Australia; here CDPP:
  11. My Form XY: Affidavit Of Lodgement to Lower Court, here to Queensland Court of Appeal:
  12. Required Editable files to download in Word.DOC format:
  13. Required Editable files to download in OpenOffice.odt format [my preference]:


 Menu: LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD:

Menu: HaigReport's LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD::


See: the Menu: for Campbell Newman LNP catholic ustashi nazi troika fraud in Qld

  1. More FRAUD & CORRUPTION from catholic Campbell Newman LNP catholic Land FRAUD:
  2. Index: LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD:
  3. Open Letter 2010/08/04 Corrupt BCC Lord Mayor Campbell Newman LNP_FRAUD:
  4. OPEN LETTER: Tony Abbott, Electors in Dickson & Rural Independents  re Peter Dutton FRAUD & bye-election in Dickson:



 Menu: Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!


Menu:Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!:

  1.  Index: Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!:
  2. 5th December, 2011: Public Open Email: Kate Jones, State Member, Ashgrove: Re Campbell Newman Guilty Armed Robbery: Qld Court of Appeal has Reserved its Decision::
  3. Latest Up-Date001: Campbell Newman Fraud/Corruption BUT labor Endemic Corruption: I_Warned TheLiberal/LNP: Dumped/Sacked Judy Magub:
  4. Actual Email to Katter's Australian Party, Bob Katter & Aidan McLindon re Campbell Newman & Armed Robbery:
  5. Latest Update002: Labor Promotes Corruption: Campbell Newman Condones Corruption: Katter's Party - No Substance: Greens Labor in Disguise:
  6. The Queensland Party: Savior of Democracy in Qld: Restore Queensland's Upper House of Parliament, the Legislative Council:

 Menu:  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!

PHPincludesCourtOfAppealOnTrial/includedMenuCourtOfAppealOnTrial.php

Menu:  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!!!


  1. Don Dale Commissioner Margaret White Judicial Corruption Connection:
  2. Affidavit for Court of Appeal: Why CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe Unfit to be a Judge due Judicial Fraud when barrister:
  3. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form27:
  4. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form29:
  5. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form38 Adduce Evidence:
  6. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Affidavit Adduce Evidence:
  7. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Deny Qualified Privilege Form27:
  8. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Unlawful Order Disability Discrimination Apprehended Bias Form27:
  9. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Unlawful Order Disability Discrimination Apprehended Bias Form29:
  10. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJ Spurious Michael Shanahan Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form27:
  11.  Appeal 25th November, 2011: Police Fraud & Disability Discrimination by Magistrate Paul Kluck, District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien, & CDPP's Shane Hunter:
  12.  Outline of Argument & Submission asAt 31st October, 2011 Appeal Qld Police Fraud & Disability Discrimination by Magistrate Paul Kluck, District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien, & CDPP Shane Hunter:
  13. Respondent's CDPP's Shane Hunter's Lies & Dishonesty in Outline of Argument for CA201/2011 Qld Court of Appeal re Qld police Fraud & Disability Discrimination: Magistrate Paul Kluck; District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien KJOB:
  14. My Response to Lies & Dishonesty in Respondent's CDPP's Shane Hunter's Outline of Argument for CA201/2011 Qld Court of Appeal re Qld police Fraud & Disability Discrimination: Magistrate Paul Kluck; District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien KJOB:
  15. Transcript of My Oral Submission on the day, 25th November, 2011, in Qld Court of Appeal, against Qld police corrupt charges to coverup Qld Government Armed Robbery of disabled citizen, before Magistate Paul M Kluck:
  16. Court of Appeal Short Hearing 25th November, 2011; Reserved Decision; Possible Way Forward - Conclusive Evidence: Armed Robbery; International Scrutiny::
  17. Decision: 13th December, 2011 [James S Douglas & Margaret White], Court of Appeal division of Supreme Court of Queensland Mathews v Commissioner of Police [2011] QCA 368 CA No 201 of 2011: :
  18. My Future Actions, after the 13/12/11 Refusal by Qld Court of Appeal of my Appeal::
  19. My request to the Qld Attorney-General to Honour His Duty to Apply to the Court to Set Aside The Miscarriage of Justice, Vexatious Litigant Order:
  20. Decision 12th August,2005: Justice Margaret White Order Remove To Conceal Fraud By Brisbane City Council & Qld Government BS4337_2005_QSC05-222Mathews_v_Morgan_Ors:
  21. Is Justice Margaret White Using Her Judicial Immunity To REPEATEDLY_Conceal Crime By Her Favoured University Of Queensland to StealHome Of Disabled Old Man?:
  22. The Decision of Glory of the Queensland Court of Appeal:
  23. Transcript: 20050601 Magistrates Court Transcript Fraud by Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich, [aka Magistrate Topsy Turvey, al la Queensland Court of Appeal], John Peden, Ms Prasley & Police Sergeant Terence G IND:
  24. Transcript: 20081217 Magistrates Court Transcript of Fraud & Farce byMagistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich & Police Sgt Cox:
  25. Index: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!
  26. CORRUPT GOVERNMENT Judge Henry George Fryberg protects CORRUPT GOVERNMENT ARMED ROBBERS:
  27. Earlier Mentions of Henry George Fryberg: the former article explains a little extra:



 Menu: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:


Menu: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:


  1. Index: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial::

  2. Considerations: How To Do It: Procedure To Follow: Advice, From High Court Registry::
  3. High Court of Australia Fees, Charges, For Application for Special Leave To Appeal: CASH::
  4. Documents: Proforma; Examples; Actual; Completed: Application for Special Leave To Appeal; AccompanyingDocuments; Draft Notice Of Appeal; Summary Of Argument::
  5. Ridiculous Pedantics: High Court Registry Fail Logic::
  6. My Form 23: My Application For Special Leave To Appeal, High Court of Australia::
  7. My Form 24: Draft Notice Of Appeal; High Court Australia:
  8. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry deemed defective, deemed not comply with High Court Rules, deemed Attachment as 'entire Document':
  9. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry found okay as I cropped a bit more image:
  10. My Form XX: Affidavit Of Service on Respondent in High Court Australia; here CDPP:
  11. My Form XY: Affidavit Of Lodgement to Lower Court, here to Queensland Court of Appeal:
  12. Required Editable files to download in Word.DOC format:
  13. Required Editable files to download in OpenOffice.odt format [my preference]:


 Menu: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld: The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ:

Menu: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld:  The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ:

  1.  Index: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld: The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ: :
  2. The 2011 Admission, Enrolment Scandal: Professor Paul Greenfield & Prof Michael Keniger resign over Undeserved Special Privilege for Greenfield's Daughter in PreMed course::
  3. Skeletons in the cupboard for Maurie McNarn ex-director of the Australian Defence Intelligence Organisation [ADIO] re Torture Abuse Murder Prisoner Rendition Abu Graib:
includedMenuProofSappideenWalkerLister.php

Menu: Proof: University of Qld law school Fraud: by Carolyn Sappideen, Geoff deQ. Walker & Andrew Lister:

  1. Proof, in Carolyn Sappideen's own handwriting of her denying me Natural Justice: Denying me my RIGHT to be Heard
  2. Geoffrey de Q. Walker's signed ADMISSION of his LYING as to why he denied me permission to study law
  3. NEW Geoffrey_deQuincey Walker, Dean of TC Bierne School of Law @ The University of Queensland, Now, ex- AAT Deputy President - NSW, Fabricates Criminal Defamatory Scenario to harm Disabled Student, To Ingratiate Himself To Corrupt Judges:
  4. Specific Details of How & Why Carolyn Sappideen Unlawfully denied me, Russell Mathews, Due Process at The University of Queensland, & Ramifications Now for the University of Western Sydney [UWS]:
  5. UWS Law Professor Carolyn Sappideen bullies disabled student with ILLEGAL conduct; ILLEGAL even if the student was not disabled:

 Menu:  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

includedMenuDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

Menu: Qld District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

G'day, This menu will collect the various mentions on our websites of our process of exposing the fraud and corruption in the Public Sector of Queensland and the Commonwealth of Australia.  So much of this corruption is in the court, but we believe we have found a 'headland' of Truth and Honesty in the Queensland Courts.  Regardless, we can take these legal matters to higher courts including UN Committees in Geneva Switzerland.  We believe we have been able to make these inroads into the corruption in Queensland and Austalia because of our websites.
  1. Submission to District Court re DCJ Griffin Recuse SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon 19th November, 2012:
  2. Submission to District Court re SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon & My Flu; 12th November, 2012:
  3. 2nd November, 2012 Unrepresented Disabled Defendant Teaches Human Rights Law To District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien:
  4. Submission To District Court DCJA Kerry O'Brien 19th October, 2012 Re Disability Arrangements Unlawful Order Is Disability Discrimination:
  5. 4th Oct 2012 Transcript DCJ Michael Shanahan Prejudges Appeal Without Jurisdiction Or Evidence Eager Misrepresent My Application To Recuse:
  6. Submission to & Appearance in District Court 4th October, 2012 Motion DCJ Michael Shanahan Disqualify Himself As catholic Due Repeated catholic Fraud, Corruption, Attempted Murder; Patsy Wolfe, Quentin Bryce, Jeff Spender; Apprehended Bias a la Ustashi, IRA, nazi:
  7. See the Outcome of my Submission [above] to mention 4th October, 2012:
  8. Magistrate Marshall Davies, Eager To Convict Innocent Disabled Man Targeted By Corrupt Police To Please Corrupt Police:
  9. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 24th August, 2012, DCJA Kerry John O'Brien Rejects Immunity from Prosecution Due Qualified Privilege Confirms SetUp by Government including Courts:
  10. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 31st July, 2012, Russell Mathews: DCJA Kerry O'Brien's back, admits ignorance, seems determined to not ensure Fair Hearing; Due Process. :
  11. Submission & Appearance to District Court 24th August, 2012 Motion Permanent Stay Qualified Privilege Social Moral Duty Expose Australian Corruption in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  12. Why Chief District Court Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe Should Disqualify From Dealing with RussellMathews,in Any Matter:
  13. Why District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien Should Disqualify From Dealing with Russell Mathews in Any Matter:
  14. Submission & Appearance to District Court "Interim Review" 31st July, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; Re DUTY of Court to Determine & Provide Accommodation of my Special Needs for Due Process & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  15. Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick Has Less Risk of Violent Attack As REAL Julie Maree Dick Is BAIT:
  16. Perjury, Fraud & Corruption Connection to "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Marie Dick:
  17. DCJ Leanne Clare nee HURLEY: Murder Pig Snr Sgt Chris HURLEY Palm Island killer Mulrunji Doomadgee, Why as DPP would she not charge her NAMESAKE?:
  18. District Court Transcript: Mention, 15th June, 2012, Russell Mathews: DUMB Chief Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe's prior professional misconduct returning to haunt her. :
  19. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:
  20. Submission to District Court Mention 15th June, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church:
  21. Hearing 16th May, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  22. Hearing 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  23. Decision 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  24. The August, 2011 [20110814] Update: on Court Case Alleging Russell Mathews' Use of a Carriage Service [Broadband] to harass but actually Exposing Even More police & political Corruption in Australia:
  25. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law does CRIMINAL FAVOUR for OTHER ISRCL 'members'
  26. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law {ISRCL} uses ISRCL EVIL contact to TARGET DISABLED PERSON
  27. Listing of Members & Directors of the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law
  28. International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Director's CRIME to DEFRAUD DISABLED PERSON
  29. What is the future for the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law After CRIME Exposure?
  30. Who are the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law?
  31. Anthony Gett sycophant to International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Evil judges:
  32. Index: District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien [We may move this file later, out of the Emails Menu: Now we have.]
  33. Submission #0001:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  34. Submission #0002:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  35. Initial General Submission to District Court coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien AO for mention 28th January, 2011
  36. Submission #0003 in Registrar's Reference; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 10AM 4th March, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another:
  37. Submission #0004 in Sec222, Justices Act 1886; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 9:30AM 16th May, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another/Commissioner of Police:
  38. State Crime Operations Command Pigs Steven Geoffrey Bignell & Brendan Scott Read [Now of KPMG] Con the Dicks To Help Police Crime
  39. Queensland Police Keep Clever Dick John Edward Dick & the REAL Julie Maree Dick On Ice To Further Police Fraud
  40. Medical Report of 20100806 ex Dr Rob Moyle re Special Needs Accommodated by Keyboard and Computer = Disability AIDS
  41. Dr Bennett's report 31st March, 1998, listing FOUR separate episodes of head injuries sustained by me

Menu: of Emails: Registry, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court emails of 20101104 re District Court coram Kerry O'Brien: Jo Stonebridge Emails Ending with Smart Arse Email Ex Smart Arse Deputy Regisrar Kerri
  2. More 20101104_District Court coram Kerry O'Brien Emails Ex District Court Jo Stonebridge & Deputy Registrar Kerri
  3. Jo StoneBridge, Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court Bogus Email Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  4. Smart Arse Email From Smart Arse Deputy Registrar Kerri
  5. Email 20101122 Jo Stonebridge District Court Sheriff & Marshal
  6. Commonwealth DPP_Handed Up Copy Of My Submission For Attention Judge Kerry John Obrien
  7. Jo Stonebridge Advises That I_Am Required To Attend Next Mention
  8. Jo StoneBridge Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court gives Bogus Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  9. District Court Registry Parasites Impede Disabled Old Man's Communication With the Court
  10. Qld Public Sector Parasite Jo Stonebridge Deems My Commuication With Court 'Not Appropriate'
  11. Jo Stonebridge Now Advises There Is No Charge for Transcripts in Criminal Matters
  12. My Direct Reproach to Jo Stonebridge for Impeding My Communication with the Court
  13. 20101206 Ken Wells Executive Officer to the Director of Courts [WOW - Big Deal] Bogus information Pittance
  14. My Advice to District Court That I_will Publish on the Web due to Her Stuffing Me Around
  15. My Advice to District Court That District Court Lacks Jurisdiction
  16. My Advice to District Court That I_Will Communicate As A_Courtesy
  17. District Court Ken Wells Response To My Reproach of Jo Stonebridge Re Courteous
MenuTranscriptsDistrictCourtKeyyOBrien

Menu: Transcripts, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 22nd November, 2010, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  2. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 28th January, 2011, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  3. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:


PHPincludesProofSappideenWalkerLister/includedOverviewMultipleUniversityQueenslandDouglasPorterFrauds.php

Overview, Synopsis, or Summary of Public Sector Parasites Bullying specifically The University of Queensland & its previous registrar [for 22 years], Douglas Porter:

When one has a great amount of factual material to relate, one has to organize it so the reader can enter the narrative.  With the internet and Google and other search engines, that is unlikely to be at the "beginning", [if there is such a thing as a "beginning"].  Basically, what I have to do is to have various levels of narrative.  One level needs to have all the facts connected in detail.  No group of facts is a closed group, but rather, facts or aspects of one group of facts, relate to, or are identical to, facts or aspects of other groups.  As well, the reader/visitor does not want to read everything ever written.  Hence I need to have various levels of summary.  One level of summary will summarize the detailed facts.  Above that, is another level of summary that will summarize a number of summaries, according to common factors or relationships, in the level below.  Sometimes, when writing the detailed facts level, another aspect, or one or more of those facts, may require a detailed analysis.   Of course, the factual situation can be viewed from a number of perspectives.  Thankfully, Google et al, will index all of those.

Menus will tend to serve that role of a summary, but merely one summary or overview..  This text could be viewed as a Menu in a narrative.  This section will link to the various parts of our websites that are referenced from here.

There are basically FOUR episodes where the University of Queensland has cheated, defrauded and discriminated against me because I am disabled.  There exists a great amount of overlap between the episodes.  Of course, the outcome of each was that I was cheated and defrauded badly.   These facts I relate reflect badly upon The University of Queensland administration and Douglas Porter in particular.

Chronologically, from 1992 four main episodes are, the Law School, in 1993, 1994 and 1995 at least, the maths department and the EPSA faculty in particular Andrew Lister in 1997 to 2001, at least, then in 2003 - 2006 the dumb femi-nazi "Queen" Janine Schmidt was "chief" librarian at UQ attacked, defrauded and discriminated against me because I was disabled.   The Criminal culminating fraud by Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland was Porter's secretly orchestrating the defrauding me of my home, for the benefit of the University of Queensland and the UQ college called St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of UQ, when Porter was secretly  the Chair of the Council that ran St Johns College.

I am a mathematician.  My greatest skills are in maths.  I guess that could be because I have always had a writing disability, undiagnosed until circa 1993.  In school, all my written work was poorly written.  Hence, as teachers who mark work, see it as a chore and tedious job to be finished as quickly as possible, judge a work by how it looks or feels to them, and gives a subjective mark.  With maths, the teachers would see the correct answer, the correct diagrams so I would receive full marks, regularly.

I returned to The University of Queensland [UQ] in 1991 doing maths.  I did well. At that time, I had hassles with public sector parasites, lying parasites and police so decided to study law at UQ.  That began the episode of repeated occasions of my being attacked, cheated and defrauded by the law school by particular individuals within the law school and within the administration of The University of Queensland.   The University of Queensland was vicariously liable for that.  The next major episode occurred with the Maths department part of the Engineering, Physical science & Architecture "Super" faculty under the Executive Dean Andrew Lister.

/PHPincludesCorruptBrisbaneDiocese/includedMenuJohnMorgan.php Menu: CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan, @ St Johns College, UQ:
  1. PROOF of the 2001 FRAUD  by CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Morgan
  2. Directory of links about Criminal parasite priest Rev Canon John Leslie Morgan:
  3. Directory of Anglican CORRUPTION matters:
  4. Anglicans conspire to steal the home of disabled with aid of political & judicial corruption
  5. PROOF of another instance that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is yet again a LIAR
  6. PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is Incompetent
  7. PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is a BULLY
  8. Email from Morgan showing he is a silly malicious ratbag 
  9. Is this Primate Aspinall's BUSINESS ACUMEN?
  10. Anglican priest bullies DISABLED Neighbour to STEAL his HOME.
  11. Yet another Morgan LIE that neither he nor St John's College had any documents about me..  I had to push it all the way to the Privacy Commission, who Morgan was repeatedly ignoring.  He really thinks he is god.
  12. Anglican CORRUPTION EXPOSED
  13. Another Morgan LIE
  14. One of the many examples of MONEY & FRAUD being motivator of 'Rev' John Morgan
  15. $1Mill+ FRAUD- St Johns College & University of Queensland
  16. Australian CRIMINAL LAW Journal ISSN: 1321-6562 26 February, 2007. Issue #: 200702
  17. FRAUD on Uni Students: $1,500 RENT PER WEEK, for an ASBESTOS RIDDEN dump.
  18. Is FRAUD the answer for Anglican return on investment?

http://HaigReport.com/aaaaMenu/Menus/includedMenuDefraudingMeMyHome.php

LinkToAspinallInMorganPanel This Profile Panel re the dumb parasitic anglican priest John Leslie Morgan, links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud by archbishop Phillip Aspinall of a vulnerable disabled guy where anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall headed up the scheme to steal the home of this vulnerable disabled guy.

http://HaigReport.com/Photos/100_0663_20070120CanonRevProfDrJohnLeslieMorganWardenStJohnsCollegeUniversityQueenslandHidingBehindToiletRolls_cr30pc.jpg
About this despicable life form , Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, now Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.

This photo was taken in a supermarket, on the 20th January, 2007 at 4:54PM Brisbane, Australia time, when Morgan was attemting to not be photographed by hiding behind some toilet rolls.

This individual is evil and he escapes scrutiny as he is a "priest".  Over time I have collected much evidence about his evil and criminal actions and published it.  I have assembled that into a menu.  I now include that menu here.
/PHPincludesCorruptBrisbaneDiocese/includedMenuJohnMorgan.php Menu: CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan, @ St Johns College, UQ:
*  PROOF of the 2001 FRAUD  by CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Morgan
*  Directory of links about Criminal parasite priest Rev Canon John Leslie Morgan:
*  Directory of Anglican CORRUPTION matters:
*  Anglicans conspire to steal the home of disabled with aid of political & judicial corruption
*  PROOF of another instance that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is yet again a LIAR
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is Incompetent
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is a BULLY
*  Email from Morgan showing he is a silly malicious ratbag 
*  Is this Primate Aspinall's BUSINESS ACUMEN?
*  Anglican priest bullies DISABLED Neighbour to STEAL his HOME.
*  Yet another Morgan LIE that neither he nor St John's College had any documents about me..  I had to push it all the way to the Privacy Commission, who Morgan was repeatedly ignoring.  He really thinks he is god.
*  Anglican CORRUPTION EXPOSED
*  Another Morgan LIE
*  One of the many examples of MONEY & FRAUD being motivator of 'Rev' John Morgan
*  $1Mill+ FRAUD- St Johns College & University of Queensland
*  Australian CRIMINAL LAW Journal ISSN: 1321-6562 26 February, 2007. Issue #: 200702
*  FRAUD on Uni Students: $1,500 RENT PER WEEK, for an ASBESTOS RIDDEN dump.
*  Is FRAUD the answer for Anglican return on investment?

We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland. 


 Menu: LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD:

Menu: HaigReport's LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD::


See: the Menu: for Campbell Newman LNP catholic ustashi nazi troika fraud in Qld

  1. More FRAUD & CORRUPTION from catholic Campbell Newman LNP catholic Land FRAUD:
  2. Index: LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD:
  3. Open Letter 2010/08/04 Corrupt BCC Lord Mayor Campbell Newman LNP_FRAUD:
  4. OPEN LETTER: Tony Abbott, Electors in Dickson & Rural Independents  re Peter Dutton FRAUD & bye-election in Dickson:



 Menu: Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!


Menu:Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!:

  1.  Index: Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!:
  2. 5th December, 2011: Public Open Email: Kate Jones, State Member, Ashgrove: Re Campbell Newman Guilty Armed Robbery: Qld Court of Appeal has Reserved its Decision::
  3. Latest Up-Date001: Campbell Newman Fraud/Corruption BUT labor Endemic Corruption: I_Warned TheLiberal/LNP: Dumped/Sacked Judy Magub:
  4. Actual Email to Katter's Australian Party, Bob Katter & Aidan McLindon re Campbell Newman & Armed Robbery:
  5. Latest Update002: Labor Promotes Corruption: Campbell Newman Condones Corruption: Katter's Party - No Substance: Greens Labor in Disguise:
  6. The Queensland Party: Savior of Democracy in Qld: Restore Queensland's Upper House of Parliament, the Legislative Council:

 Menu:  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!

PHPincludesCourtOfAppealOnTrial/includedMenuCourtOfAppealOnTrial.php

Menu:  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!!!


  1. Don Dale Commissioner Margaret White Judicial Corruption Connection:
  2. Affidavit for Court of Appeal: Why CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe Unfit to be a Judge due Judicial Fraud when barrister:
  3. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form27:
  4. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form29:
  5. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form38 Adduce Evidence:
  6. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Affidavit Adduce Evidence:
  7. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Deny Qualified Privilege Form27:
  8. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Unlawful Order Disability Discrimination Apprehended Bias Form27:
  9. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Unlawful Order Disability Discrimination Apprehended Bias Form29:
  10. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJ Spurious Michael Shanahan Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form27:
  11.  Appeal 25th November, 2011: Police Fraud & Disability Discrimination by Magistrate Paul Kluck, District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien, & CDPP's Shane Hunter:
  12.  Outline of Argument & Submission asAt 31st October, 2011 Appeal Qld Police Fraud & Disability Discrimination by Magistrate Paul Kluck, District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien, & CDPP Shane Hunter:
  13. Respondent's CDPP's Shane Hunter's Lies & Dishonesty in Outline of Argument for CA201/2011 Qld Court of Appeal re Qld police Fraud & Disability Discrimination: Magistrate Paul Kluck; District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien KJOB:
  14. My Response to Lies & Dishonesty in Respondent's CDPP's Shane Hunter's Outline of Argument for CA201/2011 Qld Court of Appeal re Qld police Fraud & Disability Discrimination: Magistrate Paul Kluck; District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien KJOB:
  15. Transcript of My Oral Submission on the day, 25th November, 2011, in Qld Court of Appeal, against Qld police corrupt charges to coverup Qld Government Armed Robbery of disabled citizen, before Magistate Paul M Kluck:
  16. Court of Appeal Short Hearing 25th November, 2011; Reserved Decision; Possible Way Forward - Conclusive Evidence: Armed Robbery; International Scrutiny::
  17. Decision: 13th December, 2011 [James S Douglas & Margaret White], Court of Appeal division of Supreme Court of Queensland Mathews v Commissioner of Police [2011] QCA 368 CA No 201 of 2011: :
  18. My Future Actions, after the 13/12/11 Refusal by Qld Court of Appeal of my Appeal::
  19. My request to the Qld Attorney-General to Honour His Duty to Apply to the Court to Set Aside The Miscarriage of Justice, Vexatious Litigant Order:
  20. Decision 12th August,2005: Justice Margaret White Order Remove To Conceal Fraud By Brisbane City Council & Qld Government BS4337_2005_QSC05-222Mathews_v_Morgan_Ors:
  21. Is Justice Margaret White Using Her Judicial Immunity To REPEATEDLY_Conceal Crime By Her Favoured University Of Queensland to StealHome Of Disabled Old Man?:
  22. The Decision of Glory of the Queensland Court of Appeal:
  23. Transcript: 20050601 Magistrates Court Transcript Fraud by Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich, [aka Magistrate Topsy Turvey, al la Queensland Court of Appeal], John Peden, Ms Prasley & Police Sergeant Terence G IND:
  24. Transcript: 20081217 Magistrates Court Transcript of Fraud & Farce byMagistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich & Police Sgt Cox:
  25. Index: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!
  26. CORRUPT GOVERNMENT Judge Henry George Fryberg protects CORRUPT GOVERNMENT ARMED ROBBERS:
  27. Earlier Mentions of Henry George Fryberg: the former article explains a little extra:



 Menu: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:


Menu: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:


  1. Index: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial::

  2. Considerations: How To Do It: Procedure To Follow: Advice, From High Court Registry::
  3. High Court of Australia Fees, Charges, For Application for Special Leave To Appeal: CASH::
  4. Documents: Proforma; Examples; Actual; Completed: Application for Special Leave To Appeal; AccompanyingDocuments; Draft Notice Of Appeal; Summary Of Argument::
  5. Ridiculous Pedantics: High Court Registry Fail Logic::
  6. My Form 23: My Application For Special Leave To Appeal, High Court of Australia::
  7. My Form 24: Draft Notice Of Appeal; High Court Australia:
  8. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry deemed defective, deemed not comply with High Court Rules, deemed Attachment as 'entire Document':
  9. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry found okay as I cropped a bit more image:
  10. My Form XX: Affidavit Of Service on Respondent in High Court Australia; here CDPP:
  11. My Form XY: Affidavit Of Lodgement to Lower Court, here to Queensland Court of Appeal:
  12. Required Editable files to download in Word.DOC format:
  13. Required Editable files to download in OpenOffice.odt format [my preference]:


 Menu: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld: The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ:

Menu: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld:  The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ:

  1.  Index: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld: The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ: :
  2. The 2011 Admission, Enrolment Scandal: Professor Paul Greenfield & Prof Michael Keniger resign over Undeserved Special Privilege for Greenfield's Daughter in PreMed course::
  3. Skeletons in the cupboard for Maurie McNarn ex-director of the Australian Defence Intelligence Organisation [ADIO] re Torture Abuse Murder Prisoner Rendition Abu Graib:
includedMenuProofSappideenWalkerLister.php

Menu: Proof: University of Qld law school Fraud: by Carolyn Sappideen, Geoff deQ. Walker & Andrew Lister:

  1. Proof, in Carolyn Sappideen's own handwriting of her denying me Natural Justice: Denying me my RIGHT to be Heard
  2. Geoffrey de Q. Walker's signed ADMISSION of his LYING as to why he denied me permission to study law
  3. NEW Geoffrey_deQuincey Walker, Dean of TC Bierne School of Law @ The University of Queensland, Now, ex- AAT Deputy President - NSW, Fabricates Criminal Defamatory Scenario to harm Disabled Student, To Ingratiate Himself To Corrupt Judges:
  4. Specific Details of How & Why Carolyn Sappideen Unlawfully denied me, Russell Mathews, Due Process at The University of Queensland, & Ramifications Now for the University of Western Sydney [UWS]:
  5. UWS Law Professor Carolyn Sappideen bullies disabled student with ILLEGAL conduct; ILLEGAL even if the student was not disabled:

 Menu:  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

includedMenuDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

Menu: Qld District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

G'day, This menu will collect the various mentions on our websites of our process of exposing the fraud and corruption in the Public Sector of Queensland and the Commonwealth of Australia.  So much of this corruption is in the court, but we believe we have found a 'headland' of Truth and Honesty in the Queensland Courts.  Regardless, we can take these legal matters to higher courts including UN Committees in Geneva Switzerland.  We believe we have been able to make these inroads into the corruption in Queensland and Austalia because of our websites.
  1. Submission to District Court re DCJ Griffin Recuse SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon 19th November, 2012:
  2. Submission to District Court re SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon & My Flu; 12th November, 2012:
  3. 2nd November, 2012 Unrepresented Disabled Defendant Teaches Human Rights Law To District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien:
  4. Submission To District Court DCJA Kerry O'Brien 19th October, 2012 Re Disability Arrangements Unlawful Order Is Disability Discrimination:
  5. 4th Oct 2012 Transcript DCJ Michael Shanahan Prejudges Appeal Without Jurisdiction Or Evidence Eager Misrepresent My Application To Recuse:
  6. Submission to & Appearance in District Court 4th October, 2012 Motion DCJ Michael Shanahan Disqualify Himself As catholic Due Repeated catholic Fraud, Corruption, Attempted Murder; Patsy Wolfe, Quentin Bryce, Jeff Spender; Apprehended Bias a la Ustashi, IRA, nazi:
  7. See the Outcome of my Submission [above] to mention 4th October, 2012:
  8. Magistrate Marshall Davies, Eager To Convict Innocent Disabled Man Targeted By Corrupt Police To Please Corrupt Police:
  9. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 24th August, 2012, DCJA Kerry John O'Brien Rejects Immunity from Prosecution Due Qualified Privilege Confirms SetUp by Government including Courts:
  10. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 31st July, 2012, Russell Mathews: DCJA Kerry O'Brien's back, admits ignorance, seems determined to not ensure Fair Hearing; Due Process. :
  11. Submission & Appearance to District Court 24th August, 2012 Motion Permanent Stay Qualified Privilege Social Moral Duty Expose Australian Corruption in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  12. Why Chief District Court Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe Should Disqualify From Dealing with RussellMathews,in Any Matter:
  13. Why District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien Should Disqualify From Dealing with Russell Mathews in Any Matter:
  14. Submission & Appearance to District Court "Interim Review" 31st July, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; Re DUTY of Court to Determine & Provide Accommodation of my Special Needs for Due Process & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  15. Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick Has Less Risk of Violent Attack As REAL Julie Maree Dick Is BAIT:
  16. Perjury, Fraud & Corruption Connection to "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Marie Dick:
  17. DCJ Leanne Clare nee HURLEY: Murder Pig Snr Sgt Chris HURLEY Palm Island killer Mulrunji Doomadgee, Why as DPP would she not charge her NAMESAKE?:
  18. District Court Transcript: Mention, 15th June, 2012, Russell Mathews: DUMB Chief Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe's prior professional misconduct returning to haunt her. :
  19. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:
  20. Submission to District Court Mention 15th June, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church:
  21. Hearing 16th May, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  22. Hearing 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  23. Decision 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  24. The August, 2011 [20110814] Update: on Court Case Alleging Russell Mathews' Use of a Carriage Service [Broadband] to harass but actually Exposing Even More police & political Corruption in Australia:
  25. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law does CRIMINAL FAVOUR for OTHER ISRCL 'members'
  26. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law {ISRCL} uses ISRCL EVIL contact to TARGET DISABLED PERSON
  27. Listing of Members & Directors of the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law
  28. International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Director's CRIME to DEFRAUD DISABLED PERSON
  29. What is the future for the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law After CRIME Exposure?
  30. Who are the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law?
  31. Anthony Gett sycophant to International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Evil judges:
  32. Index: District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien [We may move this file later, out of the Emails Menu: Now we have.]
  33. Submission #0001:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  34. Submission #0002:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  35. Initial General Submission to District Court coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien AO for mention 28th January, 2011
  36. Submission #0003 in Registrar's Reference; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 10AM 4th March, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another:
  37. Submission #0004 in Sec222, Justices Act 1886; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 9:30AM 16th May, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another/Commissioner of Police:
  38. State Crime Operations Command Pigs Steven Geoffrey Bignell & Brendan Scott Read [Now of KPMG] Con the Dicks To Help Police Crime
  39. Queensland Police Keep Clever Dick John Edward Dick & the REAL Julie Maree Dick On Ice To Further Police Fraud
  40. Medical Report of 20100806 ex Dr Rob Moyle re Special Needs Accommodated by Keyboard and Computer = Disability AIDS
  41. Dr Bennett's report 31st March, 1998, listing FOUR separate episodes of head injuries sustained by me

Menu: of Emails: Registry, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court emails of 20101104 re District Court coram Kerry O'Brien: Jo Stonebridge Emails Ending with Smart Arse Email Ex Smart Arse Deputy Regisrar Kerri
  2. More 20101104_District Court coram Kerry O'Brien Emails Ex District Court Jo Stonebridge & Deputy Registrar Kerri
  3. Jo StoneBridge, Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court Bogus Email Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  4. Smart Arse Email From Smart Arse Deputy Registrar Kerri
  5. Email 20101122 Jo Stonebridge District Court Sheriff & Marshal
  6. Commonwealth DPP_Handed Up Copy Of My Submission For Attention Judge Kerry John Obrien
  7. Jo Stonebridge Advises That I_Am Required To Attend Next Mention
  8. Jo StoneBridge Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court gives Bogus Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  9. District Court Registry Parasites Impede Disabled Old Man's Communication With the Court
  10. Qld Public Sector Parasite Jo Stonebridge Deems My Commuication With Court 'Not Appropriate'
  11. Jo Stonebridge Now Advises There Is No Charge for Transcripts in Criminal Matters
  12. My Direct Reproach to Jo Stonebridge for Impeding My Communication with the Court
  13. 20101206 Ken Wells Executive Officer to the Director of Courts [WOW - Big Deal] Bogus information Pittance
  14. My Advice to District Court That I_will Publish on the Web due to Her Stuffing Me Around
  15. My Advice to District Court That District Court Lacks Jurisdiction
  16. My Advice to District Court That I_Will Communicate As A_Courtesy
  17. District Court Ken Wells Response To My Reproach of Jo Stonebridge Re Courteous
MenuTranscriptsDistrictCourtKeyyOBrien

Menu: Transcripts, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 22nd November, 2010, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  2. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 28th January, 2011, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  3. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:


PHPincludesProofSappideenWalkerLister/includedOverviewMultipleUniversityQueenslandDouglasPorterFrauds.php

Overview, Synopsis, or Summary of Public Sector Parasites Bullying specifically The University of Queensland & its previous registrar [for 22 years], Douglas Porter:

When one has a great amount of factual material to relate, one has to organize it so the reader can enter the narrative.  With the internet and Google and other search engines, that is unlikely to be at the "beginning", [if there is such a thing as a "beginning"].  Basically, what I have to do is to have various levels of narrative.  One level needs to have all the facts connected in detail.  No group of facts is a closed group, but rather, facts or aspects of one group of facts, relate to, or are identical to, facts or aspects of other groups.  As well, the reader/visitor does not want to read everything ever written.  Hence I need to have various levels of summary.  One level of summary will summarize the detailed facts.  Above that, is another level of summary that will summarize a number of summaries, according to common factors or relationships, in the level below.  Sometimes, when writing the detailed facts level, another aspect, or one or more of those facts, may require a detailed analysis.   Of course, the factual situation can be viewed from a number of perspectives.  Thankfully, Google et al, will index all of those.

Menus will tend to serve that role of a summary, but merely one summary or overview..  This text could be viewed as a Menu in a narrative.  This section will link to the various parts of our websites that are referenced from here.

There are basically FOUR episodes where the University of Queensland has cheated, defrauded and discriminated against me because I am disabled.  There exists a great amount of overlap between the episodes.  Of course, the outcome of each was that I was cheated and defrauded badly.   These facts I relate reflect badly upon The University of Queensland administration and Douglas Porter in particular.

Chronologically, from 1992 four main episodes are, the Law School, in 1993, 1994 and 1995 at least, the maths department and the EPSA faculty in particular Andrew Lister in 1997 to 2001, at least, then in 2003 - 2006 the dumb femi-nazi "Queen" Janine Schmidt was "chief" librarian at UQ attacked, defrauded and discriminated against me because I was disabled.   The Criminal culminating fraud by Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland was Porter's secretly orchestrating the defrauding me of my home, for the benefit of the University of Queensland and the UQ college called St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of UQ, when Porter was secretly  the Chair of the Council that ran St Johns College.

I am a mathematician.  My greatest skills are in maths.  I guess that could be because I have always had a writing disability, undiagnosed until circa 1993.  In school, all my written work was poorly written.  Hence, as teachers who mark work, see it as a chore and tedious job to be finished as quickly as possible, judge a work by how it looks or feels to them, and gives a subjective mark.  With maths, the teachers would see the correct answer, the correct diagrams so I would receive full marks, regularly.

I returned to The University of Queensland [UQ] in 1991 doing maths.  I did well. At that time, I had hassles with public sector parasites, lying parasites and police so decided to study law at UQ.  That began the episode of repeated occasions of my being attacked, cheated and defrauded by the law school by particular individuals within the law school and within the administration of The University of Queensland.   The University of Queensland was vicariously liable for that.  The next major episode occurred with the Maths department part of the Engineering, Physical science & Architecture "Super" faculty under the Executive Dean Andrew Lister.

New Document New Document

Collected Menus Below for the earlier coverage of a number of instances of the Top Down complete systemic corruption at The University of Qld:

includedMenuProofSappideenWalkerLister.php

Menu: Proof: University of Qld law school Fraud: by Carolyn Sappideen, Geoff deQ. Walker & Andrew Lister:

  1. Proof, in Carolyn Sappideen's own handwriting of her denying me Natural Justice: Denying me my RIGHT to be Heard
  2. Geoffrey de Q. Walker's signed ADMISSION of his LYING as to why he denied me permission to study law
  3. NEW Geoffrey_deQuincey Walker, Dean of TC Bierne School of Law @ The University of Queensland, Now, ex- AAT Deputy President - NSW, Fabricates Criminal Defamatory Scenario to harm Disabled Student, To Ingratiate Himself To Corrupt Judges:
  4. Specific Details of How & Why Carolyn Sappideen Unlawfully denied me, Russell Mathews, Due Process at The University of Queensland, & Ramifications Now for the University of Western Sydney [UWS]:
  5. UWS Law Professor Carolyn Sappideen bullies disabled student with ILLEGAL conduct; ILLEGAL even if the student was not disabled:
PHPincludesPlagiocephaly/includedSeeMenuNewPlagiocephalyLinks.php

SEE:  Overview of multiple criminal frauds of me by Douglas Porter & The University of Queensland:

/PHPincludesBewareAvoidMathsDeptUQ/includedMenuBewareAvoidMathsDeptUQ.php

Menu: Beware, & Avoid Maths Dept University of Qld:<

  1. See the DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE FROM UQ files ProofBurrageGatesListerPorterFraudMathsDeptUQ
  2. See the DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE FROM UQ files ProofSappideenWalkerListerFraudLawUQ
  3. Index: Reasons to Beware, & Avoid the Mathematics Department @ The University of Queensland:
  4. Dr Elizabeth J Billington, Evil, Wicked but Dumb Fraud Bitch Whore Act  & "I Don't Have To Tell You".
  5. View Documentary Evidence of Whose Fraudulent Directions & Instructions Elizabeth Billington obeyed:
  6. Dr Kevin E. Gates; MN475 Fraud by Evil Criminal Bludger Liar Cheat & Parasite:
  7. MN475 Fraud & Corruption: Question 4.7.7:
  8. Professor Kevin Burrage; Backed The Wrong Side: the Evil, Criminal, Bludger, Liar, Cheat & Parasite Side:
  9. Professor Kevin Burrage; Now At Oxford University, in UK; New College & QUT Brisbane:
  10. Professor Kevin Burrage; Illegally Discriminated Against Disabled Student:
  11. Professor Kevin Burrage; Research Fraud, by Evil, Criminal, Bludger, Liar, Cheat & Parasite:
  12. University of Queensland Senate Student Appeals Committee [UQSSAC] [SSAC]:
  13. Douglas Porter, Evil Wicked Fraudster with his Corrupt, Criminal Nature On Display yet Again:
  14. Trevor J. Grigg, of Carisgold Pty Ltd: A Career of Evil Wicked Bully, Cheat, & Parasite:
  15. Andrew Lister: A Career as an Evil Wicked Bully, Cheat, & Parasite, One of Hay's "Seven Sycophants":
  16. View Documentary Evidence of Where Andrew Lister was previously Acting against the Interests of Russell Mathews
PHPincludesPlagiocephaly/includedSeeMenuNewPlagiocephalyLinks.php

SEE:  Overview of multiple criminal frauds of me by Douglas Porter & The University of Queensland:

The 'Queen' Janine Schmidt, University of Queensland LAND FRAUD MENU:
Menu: NaziBully 'Queen' Janine SCHMIDT on our HaigReport 'Retribution' Website:
  1. NaziBully 'Queen' Janine SCHMIDT on our HaigReport RETRIBUTION Website
  2. Mrs Linda Bird, another University of Queensland Post-Menopausal FAT FRAUDSTER, Public Sector Parasite
  3. 'Queen' Janine's mental minion Catherine Ann Geraghty finds lying, cheating and bullying the disabled, EXCITING
  4. Ann Tilbury is GUILTY of Criminal Assault on an Officer of the Court who was Serving her with a Summons:
  5. See the TILBURY connection to the Rhodes Scholarship BLOOD MONEY Scandal
  6. See UQ Criminal Richard Zebrovius Admission of Dangerous Driving for Douglas Porter fraud
Menu for Our New Dedicated 'Queen' Janine Schmidt Website
  1. Home Page for Our New Dedicated 'Queen' Janine Schmidt Website
  2. 'Queen' Janine Schmidt Email of 20090909 Resign, Sack or Leave Decision as Trenholme Director of Libraries, McGill Uni, Montreal, Canada.
  3. Consequences for 'Queen' Janine Schmidt, of her NAZI BULLYING  of me, and the INTERNET.
  4. Page for Links to other mentions, BY OTHER PUBLISHERS, of the 'Queen' Janine Schmidt, NAZI BULLY, on the Internet.
Menu for Our Earlier Mentions and Evidence of actions of NAZI BULLY 'Queen' Janine Schmidt at The University of Queensland: [& this Menu will go in each of these]
  1. A little early history of this Nazi Bully 'Queen' Janine Schmidt
  2. The EARLY Documented Advice [by FOI] from Registrar that I am disabled and Legally entitled to be accompanied by my Assistance dogs:
  3. Blog [now closed] entries from a number of Sources of this 'Queen' Janine's NAZI BULLY ACTIONS.
  4. An UPDATE on the early history of this Nazi Bully 'Queen' Janine Schmidt
  5. 'Queen' Janine Schmidt Had her Minion report my Assistance Dogs, so, to have them abducted from outside the Library, after 'Queen' Janine had prevented their accompanying me in the library.
  6. The Registrar's Secretary, "TilBULLY" was happy to disobey her boss to please 'Queen' Janine, & RECORDED IT.
  7. The email to Schmidt from her boss, the Registrar of The University of Queensland. re the LAW showing 'Queen' Janine Schmidt's continued intransigence, even after two years.
  8. Online Version: [3Mb]  PRINT JOURNAL: The University of Queensland Alumni Journal ISSN: 1834-660X 23 April, 2007. Issue #: 200701
includedMenuDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

Menu: Qld District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

G'day, This menu will collect the various mentions on our websites of our process of exposing the fraud and corruption in the Public Sector of Queensland and the Commonwealth of Australia.  So much of this corruption is in the court, but we believe we have found a 'headland' of Truth and Honesty in the Queensland Courts.  Regardless, we can take these legal matters to higher courts including UN Committees in Geneva Switzerland.  We believe we have been able to make these inroads into the corruption in Queensland and Austalia because of our websites.
  1. Submission to District Court re DCJ Griffin Recuse SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon 19th November, 2012:
  2. Submission to District Court re SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon & My Flu; 12th November, 2012:
  3. 2nd November, 2012 Unrepresented Disabled Defendant Teaches Human Rights Law To District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien:
  4. Submission To District Court DCJA Kerry O'Brien 19th October, 2012 Re Disability Arrangements Unlawful Order Is Disability Discrimination:
  5. 4th Oct 2012 Transcript DCJ Michael Shanahan Prejudges Appeal Without Jurisdiction Or Evidence Eager Misrepresent My Application To Recuse:
  6. Submission to & Appearance in District Court 4th October, 2012 Motion DCJ Michael Shanahan Disqualify Himself As catholic Due Repeated catholic Fraud, Corruption, Attempted Murder; Patsy Wolfe, Quentin Bryce, Jeff Spender; Apprehended Bias a la Ustashi, IRA, nazi:
  7. See the Outcome of my Submission [above] to mention 4th October, 2012:
  8. Magistrate Marshall Davies, Eager To Convict Innocent Disabled Man Targeted By Corrupt Police To Please Corrupt Police:
  9. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 24th August, 2012, DCJA Kerry John O'Brien Rejects Immunity from Prosecution Due Qualified Privilege Confirms SetUp by Government including Courts:
  10. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 31st July, 2012, Russell Mathews: DCJA Kerry O'Brien's back, admits ignorance, seems determined to not ensure Fair Hearing; Due Process. :
  11. Submission & Appearance to District Court 24th August, 2012 Motion Permanent Stay Qualified Privilege Social Moral Duty Expose Australian Corruption in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  12. Why Chief District Court Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe Should Disqualify From Dealing with RussellMathews,in Any Matter:
  13. Why District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien Should Disqualify From Dealing with Russell Mathews in Any Matter:
  14. Submission & Appearance to District Court "Interim Review" 31st July, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; Re DUTY of Court to Determine & Provide Accommodation of my Special Needs for Due Process & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  15. Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick Has Less Risk of Violent Attack As REAL Julie Maree Dick Is BAIT:
  16. Perjury, Fraud & Corruption Connection to "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Marie Dick:
  17. DCJ Leanne Clare nee HURLEY: Murder Pig Snr Sgt Chris HURLEY Palm Island killer Mulrunji Doomadgee, Why as DPP would she not charge her NAMESAKE?:
  18. District Court Transcript: Mention, 15th June, 2012, Russell Mathews: DUMB Chief Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe's prior professional misconduct returning to haunt her. :
  19. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:
  20. Submission to District Court Mention 15th June, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church:
  21. Hearing 16th May, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  22. Hearing 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  23. Decision 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  24. The August, 2011 [20110814] Update: on Court Case Alleging Russell Mathews' Use of a Carriage Service [Broadband] to harass but actually Exposing Even More police & political Corruption in Australia:
  25. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law does CRIMINAL FAVOUR for OTHER ISRCL 'members'
  26. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law {ISRCL} uses ISRCL EVIL contact to TARGET DISABLED PERSON
  27. Listing of Members & Directors of the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law
  28. International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Director's CRIME to DEFRAUD DISABLED PERSON
  29. What is the future for the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law After CRIME Exposure?
  30. Who are the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law?
  31. Anthony Gett sycophant to International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Evil judges:
  32. Index: District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien [We may move this file later, out of the Emails Menu: Now we have.]
  33. Submission #0001:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  34. Submission #0002:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  35. Initial General Submission to District Court coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien AO for mention 28th January, 2011
  36. Submission #0003 in Registrar's Reference; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 10AM 4th March, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another:
  37. Submission #0004 in Sec222, Justices Act 1886; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 9:30AM 16th May, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another/Commissioner of Police:
  38. State Crime Operations Command Pigs Steven Geoffrey Bignell & Brendan Scott Read [Now of KPMG] Con the Dicks To Help Police Crime
  39. Queensland Police Keep Clever Dick John Edward Dick & the REAL Julie Maree Dick On Ice To Further Police Fraud
  40. Medical Report of 20100806 ex Dr Rob Moyle re Special Needs Accommodated by Keyboard and Computer = Disability AIDS
  41. Dr Bennett's report 31st March, 1998, listing FOUR separate episodes of head injuries sustained by me
PHPincludesPlagiocephaly/includedSeeMenuNewPlagiocephalyLinks.php

SEE:  Overview of multiple criminal frauds of me by Douglas Porter & The University of Queensland:

Menu: of Emails: Registry, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court emails of 20101104 re District Court coram Kerry O'Brien: Jo Stonebridge Emails Ending with Smart Arse Email Ex Smart Arse Deputy Regisrar Kerri
  2. More 20101104_District Court coram Kerry O'Brien Emails Ex District Court Jo Stonebridge & Deputy Registrar Kerri
  3. Jo StoneBridge, Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court Bogus Email Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  4. Smart Arse Email From Smart Arse Deputy Registrar Kerri
  5. Email 20101122 Jo Stonebridge District Court Sheriff & Marshal
  6. Commonwealth DPP_Handed Up Copy Of My Submission For Attention Judge Kerry John Obrien
  7. Jo Stonebridge Advises That I_Am Required To Attend Next Mention
  8. Jo StoneBridge Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court gives Bogus Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  9. District Court Registry Parasites Impede Disabled Old Man's Communication With the Court
  10. Qld Public Sector Parasite Jo Stonebridge Deems My Commuication With Court 'Not Appropriate'
  11. Jo Stonebridge Now Advises There Is No Charge for Transcripts in Criminal Matters
  12. My Direct Reproach to Jo Stonebridge for Impeding My Communication with the Court
  13. 20101206 Ken Wells Executive Officer to the Director of Courts [WOW - Big Deal] Bogus information Pittance
  14. My Advice to District Court That I_will Publish on the Web due to Her Stuffing Me Around
  15. My Advice to District Court That District Court Lacks Jurisdiction
  16. My Advice to District Court That I_Will Communicate As A_Courtesy
  17. District Court Ken Wells Response To My Reproach of Jo Stonebridge Re Courteous
MenuTranscriptsDistrictCourtKeyyOBrien

Menu: Transcripts, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 22nd November, 2010, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  2. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 28th January, 2011, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  3. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:


includedMenuAvengerRevengeRetribution.php.html

Menu: Retribution for FRAUD & BULLYING by Douglas Porter & The University of Qld, of DISABLED old man.

[A Cascading Drop Down Menu [CDDM] will soon be in this spot.]
  1. Douglas Porter [& University of Qld] FRAUD on Disabled Old Man to BULLY him
  2. How Nazi BULLY of Disabled old man, ex librarian Janine Schmidt "repaid".
  3. Read how BCC bully Councillor Judy Magub "repaid" for assisting to defraud disabled old man.
  4. The University of Queensland is fully liable for the Fraud of ex Registrar Douglas Porter.
  5. The Clandestine method used by Douglas Porter to defraud the disabled old man.
  6. Means that Anglican Church Fraudster Priest Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan used to defraud the disabled old man.
  7. Rev John Morgan's Fraud he called Australian Institute of Ethics and the Professions
  8. The way that the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church assisted the Fraud of the disabled old man or BIG PROFITS!
  9. Douglas Porter is the Chairman of the UQ council called St Johns College Council that Runs St Johns College.
  10. The real lowdown on St Johns College at The University of Queensland, and is part of the Australian Public Sector [Government].
  11. How Lawyer Stephen Tonge, a UQ hanger on, profited by assisting the fraud of the disable old man.
  12. Korske Ara Amrita   ISSN: 1834-6340   [What is Korske Ara Amrita?] 
  13. Louise Kitchen Amrita   ISSN:  1834-643X   [What is Louise Kitchen Amrita?]
  14. The Magistrate whose conduct in Court was described buy the Qld Court of Appeal as Topsy-Turvy "Sentence First - Verdict afterwards".
  15. How Magistrate PaulM Kluck Denies a Fair Hearing & DueProcess by denying Accommodation of the Disabled old man's Special Needs
  16. No Jurisdiction: Lies, Fraud, Hot Potato-Get Rid of It
  17. Shane Hunter, the CDPP lawyer uses an abuse of court process to bully a disabled old man.
  18. The way that Tony Roser, Registrar of Courts, at the Brisbane Magistrates Court thinks he can bully the disabled old man.
  19. How Magistrates Courts' incompetent Tape recorder operator, Nikki Parisi, has tickets on herself and stuffs up.
  20. The Multiple ways Police/cop Armed Robber Henri Elias Rantala assisted the defrauding of the Disabled Old Man.
  21. The  ways Police/cop Armed Robber Monica Antony assisted the defrauding of the Disabled Old Man.
  22. The WIDESPREAD fraud & corruption, across Australia, of the rspca taking advantage of the public sector corruption across Australia.
  23. The FRAUD & CORRUPTION of Maree Fell and co of the Society of St Vincent de Paul, in Cairns as they lied and cheated to close down Vinnies' Gym and steal all Gym equipment belonging to Jim Tierney.
  24. Expose of ex Dean of Law at UQ, Geoffrey deQ Walker as he set out to cheat disabled old man to please his corrupt colleagues.
  25. Expose of how UQ Deputy Vice-Chancellor Ted Brown Conspired with Douglas Porter, and ex Dean of Law at UQ, Geoffrey deQ Walker to cheat disabled Old man.
  26. The fraud, perjury, lies and cheating of the Disabled Old Man by ex Coles Manager Linda Maree Wease.
  27. The many levels of corruption in the Queensland Police:
  28. Police/copper Brendan Read defrauds disabled old man & Signs Oath of facts of which he has no knowledge.
  29. Accountants KPMG wanted ex cop Brendan Read who deposed to false oath, to defraud clients of KPMG.
  30. Brisbane City Council concoct RUSE  to try to justify Armed Robbery For University of Queensland & Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church.
  31. Campbell Newman happy to conceal the fraud and Armed Robbery of disabled old many by BCC.
  32. Australia's Governor-General's connection to, and knowledge of, FRAUD in the Courts in Qld
  33. When a barrister, Chief Judge of the Qld District Court Patsy Mary Wolfe Abrogated her Paramount Duty To the Court and so Defrauds Disabled old man.
  34. For Years Qld's Translink cheat the Disabled Old Man by banning his Assistance dogs.
  35. Peter Strachan, Translink CEO is the Incompetent Public Sector Parasite Discriminates against the Disabled & reclusive Old Man.
  36. Are Margaret White, Patsy Mary Wolfe & Quentin Bryce previously of UQ_Law Faculty a Corrupt Tyranny Trio due  Fraud & Fraud On Courts?
  37. BEWARE of UQ Sports Ltd as Chairman, Douglas Porter is a Criminal & Fraudster. He is not a fit & proper person to be a company director.
  38. You decide.  Is Susan Barker of the Queensland Office of Information Commissioner, Incompetent or a Fraud?
  39. Valuable Information about the Queensland Office of the Information Commissioner.
  40. Is John Briton,  the Legal Services Commissioner for Queensland, Incompetent or a Fraud?  He stated in writing, the contrary of a basic legal principle.
  41. Valuable Information about the Queensland Legal Services Commission.
  42. Valuable Information about the Queensland Crime & Misconduct Commission.
PHPincludesPlagiocephaly/includedSeeMenuNewPlagiocephalyLinks.php

SEE:  Overview of multiple criminal frauds of me by Douglas Porter & The University of Queensland:

includedSummaryCaseFraudPoliceAndCDPP.php

Summary of the case by the Criminal, corrupt & FRAUDULENT Qld police AGAINST Disabled Old Man

This is the case where corrupt police and a corrupt Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, attempt to use brute force, of police arrest and harassment to silence the disabled old man, to conceal how the Queensland police performed an Armed Robbery on him to Assist the Queensland Government defraud the disabled old man of his house and land that he owned and which was his home.

The disabled old man has brain damage caused by severe head injury when a teenager.  That affects his ability to "work" for any but short time periods.  He is able to concentrate for only short periods. This is near impossible for a casual observer to notice.  He quickly becomes fatigued and if he is forced to continue to try to concentrate, that results in mental exhaustion.  On the first day of hearing, knowing the disabled old man's disability and the nature of it, Magistrate Klutz ridiculed the disabled old man, even though the disabled old man was trying hard to accommodate what the Magistrate desired.   CLEARLY, THE DISABLED OLD MAN MUST REFUSE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS, UNLESS AND UNTIL HIS SPECIAL NEEDS CONSEQUENT UPON HIS DISABILITIES ARE FULLY ACCOMMODATED.   THIS IS ESSENTIAL IF HE IS TO RECEIVE DUE PROCESS.  THE ONUS IS UPON THE MAGISTRATE, JUDGE AND DECISION MAKER, TO ENSURE THAT THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS EXTENDED DUE PROCESS aka NATURAL JUSTICE.

THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS HAPPY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS PROVIDED HE RECEIVES DUE PROCESS. 

The real crux of this fraud upon the disabled old man and concurrently, UPON THE JUSTICE AND LEGAL SYSTEM OF QUEENSLAND AND AUSTRALIA, is that this disabled old man is being prosecuted in the most contemptuous way, to continue the EXPLOITATION OF HIS BEING DISABLED BY THE QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT, in that the Queensland Government, defrauded/stole from the disabled old man, the house and land that he owned that was his home, for the use of and by The University of Queensland.  The clandestine fraud was orchestrated by the Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  The fraud involved an ARMED ROBBERY of the disabled old man by Queensland Police in company with a Queensland government Authority, for the benefit of another Queensland Government authority viz, The University of Queensland. The case involved a fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man. The same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala also charged the disabled old man with other charges to favour The University of Queensland, who had been defrauding the disabled old man for years.  ..

Instead of the Australian government doing as it should to honour its International Commitments [
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]] to rail against exploitation of disabled persons, it is actually perpetuating, ITSELF, the exploitation of this disabled old man, because no doubt, the exploitation of the disabled old man was by the Queensland Government, and a number of parts of the Queensland Government in collusion.

This fraud of the disabled old man was orchestrated by Queensland Public Sector Parasite, Douglas Porter, when he was Registrar of The University of Queensland, for the benefit of The University of Queensland and to punish the disabled old man for standing up for his rights as a Disabled person, while at The University of Queensland.  Involved in the Porter perpetrated fraud was an ARMED ROBBERY by the Queensland Government being the Queensland police in particular corrupt cops Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony, of the disabled old man at his home together with a concurrent fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man by the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala.

The law confirms that the Armed Robbery by Henri EliasRantala and Monica Louise Antony, was actually a CRIMINAL
armed robbery. The factual evidence is also online.  The conduct constituting the armed robbery was not just accidental.   The perpetrators of the fraud, Queensland Public Sector parasites, set out to create what they expected would be an arguable case TO JUSTIFY THE "ARMED ROBBERY" as just part of their normal operations.    They created a RUSE for just that reasonHowever, the silly bitch lawyer Joanne Whiting, did not know what she was doing, so clearly the Ruse was hatched by one of her superiors.

That fact then begs the question of the purpose of that
RUSE and armed robbery, and exposes the perpetrators of the defrauding of the disabled old man of his home.  Because the Queensland Government perpetrated the fraud of the disabled old man of his home, his house and land, the Queensland government wants it concealed.  Therefore, the conduct of prosecuting the disabled old man is criminal and makes the perpetrated an accessory to the fraud.  The evidence giving those prosecuting the disabled old man a "guilty mind" is all that evidence on that webpage.  Those involved now in "prosecuting" the disabled old man  are criminal. 

While the corrupt parasite Shane Hunter, a prosecutor from the Commonwealth DPP, had the knowledge that the corrupt police Rantala and Antony did commit an armed robbery, he cannot be prosecuted as he has "advocates' immunity".  However, none of the others involved in the process of prosecuting the Disabled Old Man have immunity.  Corrupt ex-cop [now 'working' for KPMG] Brendan Scott Read had put another "prosecutor" from the CDPP right into the frame, by admitting they colluded to bring the false charges against the disabled old man, but that prosecutor was not an advocate in this matter, so does not have
advocates' immunity.  That other parasite from the CDPP is named Anthony Gett.  Corrupt ex-cop Brendan Scott Read also does not have immunity from prosecution for being an accessory to the Armed Robbery and to the defrauding the disabled old man of his house and land, worth in the order of $1million.  Of course, we will be assisting the disabled old man to gain many more similar house and land properties in the area from the Fraudsters.  This will include the house of the defrauding lawyer who did the transfer of the title with full knowledge of the fraud.  His name is Stephen Tonge.  The Queensland Government, both the Queensland Public Sector university, The University of Queensland, and the Queensland Government of Anna Bligh proper,  will be up for the majority of the damages.  This all arose because the disabled old man IS disabled.  It was thought by the public sector parasites, with UQ Registrar Douglas Porter, as the lead criminal in the box seat driving the fraud of the disabled old man, that the disabled old man was ripe for exploitation, because he is permanently disabled.  Now, the Commonwealth of Australia, in the person of the corrupt Commonwealth DPP prosecutor Shane R. Hunter, has joined the fray exploiting the disabled old man.  This in in stark contravention of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The parasitic Federal labor government acceded to the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities  on 21st August, 2009.

Because all the police involved in the prosecution of the disabled old man, are presumed to know the detail of the evidence proving the armed robbery because the evidence and legal reason is in the Public Domain, online and it would be reasonable to presume that police would check its validity, and we know the evidence is 100% genuine, then all the police including the police solicitor Paxton Booth are put in the frame by the evidence of Brendan Scott Read.  The other police aware of the criminal conduct in which they were engaged included  Detective Sergeant Steven Bignall, Detective Senior Constables Gavin Hackett and Detective Senior Constable Dave Graham.  Each of these has been engaged in a criminal activity.  This amounts to 

Because parasitic fraudster Shane Hunter of the CDPP was prepared to prosecute these charges, when he knew the evidence proved that police Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony committed an Armed Robbery, suggests that he expected a win, meaning that he knew the Magistrates Court, and possibly the District Court are corrupt, like as displayed, maybe by Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and District Court Judge Leanne Clare.  that .d ..


This case now has a high profile International dimension.  Australia has ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD].  Importantly, the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia has, on 21st August, 2009 acceded to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [OP].  As shyster Shane Hunter is a Commonwealth Public Servant within the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, a Commonwealth Agency, a part of the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, he and it are subject to the OP.  As the disabled old man has already suffered extensive discrimination, and fraud, at the hands of Shyster Shane Hunter, breach of the CRPD has already occurred and hence, pursuant to the OP, formal complaint can be made to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Geneva, Switzerland, once all domestic Australian remedies have been exhausted, or effectively exhausted.

The summary for each day will be a Menu of the anchors [or markers/tags] placed in the Transcript of this day.  It will be effectively a Summary of the discussion between the Magistrate Paul M Kluck [the Klutz] and Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, [who knows the evidence that  proves the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala did in fact commit an armed robbery because no-one had authority to enter exclusively possessed land, on that occasion; they needed a court order but did not have one].  The disabled old man did not appear in the committal hearing coram Kluck, after 28th June, as he had become ill from the constant barrage of harassment and jibes aimed at his disabilities, and attacks upon his weaknesses caused by his disabilities, from the Magistrate Kluck the Klutz and from the Commonwealth Government lawyer fraudster Shane Hunter.  Of course, neither need worry as Magistrate Klutz has Judicial Immunity and shyster Shane Hunter who knows he is assisting a crime perpetrated by the Government against a disabled citizen, including EXPLOITATION of the DISABLED, to remain concealed, has Advocates' Immunity.  In Kluck's court, Due Process was abrogated, because the disabled old man had Special Needs that were not accommodated by Paul M Kluck. Hence, from that moment, Kluck's court became a nullity. Thus, from then, the disabled old man was denied Due Process.  Read on the transcript, how Magistrate Kluck ridiculed the disabled old man.

At the time of committing the Armed Robbery of the disabled old man, Henri Elias Rantala illegally arrested the disabled old man so as to keep him from his home while his home was ransacked and his yard was cleared of all of his possession to order of the Queensland Government, who wished to take control of his property in quick time, for The University of Queensland to use.  This was orchestrated by the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  Well, on 20th July, 2010, 22 days after the last day that the disabled old man tried to perform in the committal hearing, on 28th June, 2010, the Queensland Court of Appeal gave it decision regarding that illegal arrest on that day of the disabled old man by parasite cop Rantala.  In clear dicta the Court of Appeal raised the spectre of the gross criminality involved in the whole matter

This day's transcript is one continuous file/page.  These anchors when listed will be listed in sequence.
The three days when witnesses have actually given evidence have been similarly summarised with "anchors" [aka markers/tags], and each appears thus:
  1. Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  2. Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  3. Day 3: 28th June, 2010
This case has international consequences, as this action by the Commonwealth Prosecutor, given that the disabled old man has been thrown out of his home by a corrupt judicial system of the magistrates and District Courts, is a disgusting reflection upon the judicial principle of Due Process, for any country in the world. This will make Australia the laughing stock of the international justice community.  So much more so as all this has been done with the full knowledge of the Australian Attorney General, Robert McClelland.


See **** The EVIDENCE **** that ex-police cop parasite Peter Dutton, Liberal Party Federal MP for Dickson, tried, but failed, to close down our website disclosing labor ELECTORAL FRAUD, using corrupt Qld cops.

  Australian Federal Court Judge Jeffrey Spender is criminal scum. See the EVIDENCE

BREAKTHROUGH in Daniel Morcombe case.
We
SCOOPED Channel 7, TV & EXPOSED POLICE CORRUPTION.

See the photo PROOF
 E-Contact us to tell us what you think:

This website is part of the web-presence of

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA

View list of SOME of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html

SEE WHAT I PLAN TO DO ABOUT IT!

Image

CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE


Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA

View list of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html

See our LATEST TOPICS:

HOT NEWS: HARD EVIDENCE:  Joe Hockey & FASCIST CRIMINAL congress

I have been bullied my whole life.  See the reason.  That means that I have had fights my whole life.  You can realize the I detest bullies; that is, bullies that are personal to me, politically domestically which includes corrupt polticians, judges and ,MAGISTRATES  & MAGISTRATESmagistrates, more magistrates, lawyers, lawyers, and police, police, and other public sector parasites, plus, politically INTERNATIONALLY.

20041129 more reduced and cropped photo police Rantala.jpgDCP_0517_Big_Big_Big_A_Constable_Antony.jpg

















 CORRUPT ARMED ROBBER [with violence] Henri Elias Rantala. 

[see NEW Website on Henri Rantala]  

"PPheeeeew , that is HUUUUGE", he whispered.

Monica Antony [BigA for Antony]

Corrupt Cops  [talk about being the BUTT of humour]   'Does Swine flu [flew] have anything to do with the POLICE AIR WING? '  and who said, 'PIGS WILL FLY'.

SEE WHAT I PLAN TO DO ABOUT IT!

My Qualifications

       Bachelor of Commerce [BCom] [The University of Queensland] - 1978
       Bachelor of Science [BSc] [The University of Queensland]
- 1997
       Bachelor of Laws [LLB]
[The University of Queensland] - 2003
       Bachelor of Arts [BA]
[The University of Queensland] - 2003


   Police Constable Henri Elias Rantala aka 'Minge'  aka 'Dummy'  
20041129 more reduced and
            cropped photo police Rantala.jpg About this parasite , Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, now groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queensland police and Queensland government.
Rantala is a rare case within the Queensland Police Service [QPS] in that he he was "groomed" and "fast tracked" to continue the fraud, corruption and bribery that is the QPS within the wholesale corruption that is the Queensland labor Government.  [One major way to reduce this is the restoration of the Upper House  to the Queensland Parliament, the Legislative Council, as a democratically elected house.  It was abolished by the Queensland labor government in 1922.]  Rantala was groomed to be a police prosecutor, which is one position where police can be particularly corrupt.  As Prosecutors, they had Advocates Immunity.  I have been able to have this parasite under oath in the witness box subject to my cross examination.   In his evidence in chief at "Call Henri Elias Rantala" he produced a litany of lies.   My cross examination of him, and his replies thereto, at My Cross-Examination Of Corrupt Police Parasite Henri Elias Rantala,  are most instructive.  Considering all the subsequent events in the attempted corrupt cover-up of this gross crime of Armed Robbery by the Queensland Government, the extended period of planning activity that went into the perpetration of this Armed Robbery, and the fact that Rantala Left Indooroopilly Station from which he launched this Armed Robbery, targeting me, soon after in January2005, it appears Rantala was in integral part of this armed Robbery targeting me.  Just a few days prior, Douglas Porter, the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, for whom, as its Rep, Porter was orchestrating this Armed Robbery as a step towards stealing my beneficial ownership of my home, house and land, caused an attack on me and then called the police to me, and Rantala appeared..

 I will build in this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form.  This caption will accompany the image of Henri Elias Rantala where ever it appears on our websites.  It will be progressively added to all previous representations of his photo.
We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this parasite .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queensland police and Queensland government.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queenslan