HAIG    REPORT:    GoTo [on this page] HaigReport's Menu Of Themes of Menus for our thousands of pages
TIPS for
Navigating HaigReport:  If you arrived at this page, referred from a Search Engine such as Google et al, your URL link will NOT have an #Anchor/Marker to take you to the relevant spot on this page.  In that case, we do recommend that you view our "Latest HaigReport Promotions" of recent additions to our websites, by Clicking Here.  It will open in a new Browser window. 

If
you Click Here, you will be taken, usually, to the specific Unique Content on this page, for which you were most likely seeking.  However, if you Click Here, you will be taken to the Top of the HaigReport Header, below on this page. 

However, if you have arrived at this page from another of our Website pages, your link will usually have an #Anchor, also called a marker, which will take you to the intended specific spot on the page where that marker is positioned.  In fact, it will probably take you there prior to your reading this.  Moving to that Anchor is the final step in the loading of this page.

 HAIG     REPORT:   Is now on  twitter  [from 2nd June, 2013]  link to us HERE on twitter     See our Twitter Strategy    

 HAIG    REPORT:  SEE: Russell Mathews' COMMENTARY:    Russell Mathews' [BCom BSc LLB & BA] current TOPICAL commentary on GOVERNMENT, politics & business     Press to READ       Press for MENU   

 HAIG    REPORT:    WANTED:
Healthy female "dog" to breed with Parson Russell Terrier, to produce ASSISTANCE DOGS.   Rochedale South QLD 4123
I wish to breed from my Parson Russell Terrier. He is a trained assistance dog. He has a wonderful nature. The breed of his mate could be varied or a cross; eg Parson Russell Terrier, Jack Russell Terrier, Beagle, Bull Terrier, Bull mastiff, Staffy, and/or Fox Terrier plus many others. She does not need to be "pedigreed". I am very protective of my dogs. She will become very valuable to me and become one of my assistance "dogs". If we can assist each other, please contact me on my contact form, including your email address and your landline phone number so I can phone you to discuss. 

Because I am disabled and have an LLB [so therefore understand the Law surrounding disabilities and assistance dogs] I am now branching out to providing Assistance dogs to disabled persons [even if disabled in only a minor way and so not even realizing it]. This is not a business proposition but rather just a very necessary service I can offer to the community.
Many people have a disability and do not realize their ailment or "problem" is by law, the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA], classified as a "disability". This is especially so for people getting on in years, and who have a dog, and are maybe moving to accommodation where they are told they cannot take their dog. In a majority of cases, those people cannot be legally forced to surrender their animal/dog.
I will be assisting those person who already have dogs, but are being forced, unlawfully, to dispose of them because maybe they are moving accommodation. I can train your existing dogs to be assistance dogs and provide the documentation as required by the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA]. I do not intend to charge for this, but just maybe cover some marginal costs.

    View the Latest    HAIG     REPORT Promotions:  in this Scrolling Window, or OPEN in new browser:     

 Click here  to Learn how your Personalized Alert Notice [IMMEDIATELY ABOVE] is prepared by our HAIG Unique Visitor Algorithm: [HUVA] or  Click here  to see your UNIQUE Personalized Alert Notice in a new Browser Window.


 Submission & Appearance to District Court "Interim Review" 31st July, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; Re DUTY of Court to Determine & Provide Accommodation of my Special Needs for Due Process & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:


My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies. The HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies.

   It is Our legal, social and moral DUTY to EXPOSE CRIME, FRAUD & CORRUPTION plus Lying and Hypocrisy in Public Life, Including Judges & magistrates 
 

Fraud, Corruption & attempted  MURDER 
covered-up by Queensland police, EXPOSED 

header: Qld District Court coram Kerry O'Brien:

Qld District Court coram Kerry O'Brien: 
Australian Government Steals Disabled Old Man's home for The University of Queensland to punish Disabled Old Man for being DISABLED & wants Court's sanction.

commonheader.php

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.  
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      EMAIL us anytime:  Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay. 

considerevidence.php

Consider the evidence! Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay.  

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Submission & Appearance to District Court "Interim Review" 31st July, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; Re DUTY of Court to Determine & Provide Accommodation of my Special Needs for Due Process & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE

See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for Chief Justice Paul deJersey _v_ Court of Appeal President Margaret McMurdo; Judicial War Supreme Court of Qld

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for Corrupt Qld Judiciary: Favours Untouchable Banks FRAUD; What is Chief Justice of Supreme Court of Qld, Paul deJersey doing?

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for Woolworths/BigW: The Experience by a disabled customer, of Woolworth's BULLYING & BigW's MISLEADING & DECEPTIVE CONDUCT

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Submission & Appearance to District Court "Interim Review" 31st July, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; Re DUTY of Court to Determine & Provide Accommodation of my Special Needs for Due Process & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE

 Content: Submission & Appearance to District Court "Interim Review" 31st July, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; Re DUTY of Court to Determine & Provide Accommodation of my Special Needs for Due Process & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
[READERS/VISITORS: You can see the transcript of the hearing to which this submission is directed and is my appearance which is now online.]
G'day DCJ handling my matter of the Interim Review Hearing set for
31st July, 2012 in respect of the purported Section 20B Crimes Act 1914 referral.

On 15 June, 2012, the CDCJ Wolfe set the 31st July, 2012 as an "interim Review" date.[and see in Transcript:]   This is my submission and Appearance at that "Interim Review Hearing". 

I require that a date for a further "Review" Hearing be set another  four weeks hence; I suggest 28th August, 2012.

I effectively move from the Bar Table, given that I am disabled and that this procedure is a Reasonable adjustment to alleviate the effects of my disability, [in fact it is the preferred option by many courts to decide matters "on the papers", that this District Court should  so order:

I remind the court, that the District Court has no jurisdiction in this "matter", as the "referral" was ultra vires as the purported Committal Hearing coram Kluck in the Brisbane Magistrates' Court was already, long before that purported referral, a nullity due to denial of Natural Justice to the defendant, myself.  It was thus void ab initio.

Any order that any DC judge makes in this "matter" is thus a nullity.

Nothing would surprise me due to the extensive corruption that has been directed at me by Courts in Qld,  [I am sure all DCJs are aware of Magistrate Topsy Turvy, - it was nominated as the Talk of the Legal World in the Courier Mail in August, 2010], and law enforcement in Qld including Armed Robbery because on that occasion a Court Order was required by Sec 160 of the Health Act 1937 but was non existent. 

I advise that I am disabled and  have RIGHTS because of my disabilities.  This will mean that ALL reasonable special measures are adopted and implemented by the court to ensure that ALL of my Special Needs are accommodated.  The only way required Special Measures can be denied me is if the provision of those Special Measures subject the court or "provider" of the Special Measures to "Unjustifiable Hardship", and if they do and the court so argues, then my special need is denied accommodation, such that an unfair hearing would follow so hence, the court would not be able to proceed.  While the court and all justices/judges have Judicial Immunity, so effectively they do what they like to continue the attacks, fraud and discrimination that have been directed towards me [This litany of fraud of me by organs of the Queensland labor government was highlighted in my previous submission in this matter on 15th June, 2012 [marked “Exhibit A” for identification] and is also on its own page, because I am disabled, the prosecutor, the CDPP being an organ of the Executive of the Commonwealth of Australia, is subject to the International Law of the Convention on the Rights of persons with Disabilities [CRPD].  Notwithstanding Judicial Immunity, the court must apply applicable law or the hearing and this matter will have further reason to be
ultra vires and a nullity.  Hence, as the CDPP is prosecuting in this court, the CRPD is applicable law to this court.

If my disability is merely "raised on the evidence", as it has been repeatedly including by me previously, and NOW, it is the RESPONSIBILITY OF THE COURT to ensure a Fair Hearing, and thus, that all my Special Needs are accommodated.   The Onus is not upon me to ensure the court extends to me a Fair Hearing, Due Process, Natural Justice and Procedural Fairness.  The Onus is upon the court to determine my Special Needs.  Most assuredly, the court cannot bully me like Magistrate Kluck was doing with the agreement and SUPPORT, of Shane Hunter of the CDPP.  Hence, everything since that, is ultra vires , but it seems that Shane Hunter, Nicola Roxon, Anthony Gett [known to many judges as a fawning  sycophant] are keen  to subject me to more torture.

The relevant Review is on the 31st July, 2012.  I shall forward the final version of this as an HTML email [and as a pdf attachment], to the Court Registry, Shane Hunter of the CDPP [Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions] and to the Commonwealth Attorney General Nicola Roxon, on the evening of 30th July, 2012.  I shall progressively build this submission online.

I intend that this will bite back hard at the parasites who have chosen to exploit me, a Disabled Old Man, and all the many organs of Government both Queensland and Australian. that have perpetuated the fraud by Armed Robbery that has been perpetrated against me.  This matter of the 20B referral is piggy-backing upon the four charges that is one more instance of perpetuation of the continuing fraud of me, and so is yet again another instance of perpetuation of the fraud and Exploitation of a Disabled Old Man. 


I require that this submission be my appearance in court at this Interim Review and that this, my submission and 'appearance' in court for this mention, be included On the Record.  I am not in court today due to my disability.  This is my statement to the court on this occasion of this mention. It will be Disability Discrimination if that inclusion does not occur. While the Court has Judicial Immunity, Shane Hunter and the CDPP are part of the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, as is Attorney General, Nicola Roxon, and all are subject to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol.  As Shane Hunter and the CDPP have attempted to use, in the past,  the defence disqualified by the Nuremberg Nazi trials, where that defence was used by the Nazis in Nuremberg to excuse the Nazi Holocaust; of not being able to think for themselves [public servants(?)], but having acted as automatons, they, Shane Hunter and all Members of the Executive of the Government of Australia,  should refuse to continue in this hearing/mention, if I am about to suffer Disability Discrimination.  They should have refused to continue in the all previous hearings/mentions when I was being denied my Human Rights by virtue of my disabilities.

MY purpose at this "Interim Review"  "hearing" is to activate the Court's consideration of two principal matters.  One is of Due Process consequent upon my disabilities, and thus the requirement to ensure a Fair Hearing as a matter of Natural Justice.   Fair Hearing is a DUTY of every court, even the lowest; of the low.  It is the BASIC DUTY of our Courts of Law, since the demise of the STAR CHAMBER, or is the STAR CHAMBER about to make its revival to GETT Russell Mathews as is being attempted by this prosecution, the action by Magistrate Topsy Turvy aka "Wally" to his corrupt copper mate Henri Elias Rantala as he called, aka Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich when under oath, and other Judicial and Qld Government Executive deeds.   No court can ignore its DUTY with the view, "Well, if the hearing has been unfair, it can be picked up on Appeal."  I would imagine that the more senior judges in the courts in which an appeal would be mounted would be not too pleased with the recalcitrant judges in the lower courts, making more work for the judges in the Appeal Courts when it is just a "mechanical action".   It is not at all difficult, for the court.  I am happy to be of assistance, but it is the Court's DUTY.

Determination of All Essential Special Measures to Accommodate the Special Needs due to Disability of the Defendant to Ensure the Fair Hearing element of Due Process:

In my case there are a number of expert functions that the COURT must ENSURE are first accomplished to ensure Natural Justice of a FAIR HEARING, or all of its decisions will be ultra vires and all total nullities.  These are
  1. the nature of my disabilities and the features of them;
  2. the Special Needs that arise from the features of my disabilities;
  3. the Special Measures aka Adjustments aka Mechanisms that can be employed to ACCOMMODATE those Special Needs, mostly unique  to my disabilities.
I am  not an expert  in any of these disciplines.  I contend that neither is any judge of the District Court.   Judges would I guess, be capable of deciding only, whether or not, that determined  Accommodation would produce an Unjustifiable Hardship for the court, but no more.

This is an essential step.  NOTHING can  proceed without a Fair Hearing nor precede that determination.   The District Court cannot proceed regardless now that there is sufficient evidence, before this court, of disability in the defendant. It need only to be raised on the evidence.  For smooth performance of he eventual trial,, these preliminary matters should be determined well in advance of the empaneling of the jury at  trial, so that the smooth running of the courts are not adversely affected, especially when Jurors may have been empaneled.  Perish the thought that any judge of the District Court would want to cause confrontation with an unrepresented defendant  in front of a jury.

The evidence from a number of experts will be required to gain the greatest probability that the trial/hearing before the jury proceeds in a planned process.   This is SOLELY the RESPONSIBILITY of the COURT to accomplish.  I am only too willing to be of assistance.

I am advised and  truly believe that for  "
the nature of my disabilities and the features of them" the most appropriate experts will be neurologists who have treated me most recently.  For that purpose, I advise the Neurologists at The Royal Brisbane Hospital who treated me following the occasion  of the assassination attempt upon me on 14th January, 1996 as detailed below.  On that occasion, my injuries were so serious that I was an inpatient for 16 days in the Neurosurgery Ward of the Royal Brisbane Hospital.   I am advised and  truly believe that my major disability is associated with Brain damage.  From that attack, since the bones in my face and head were remodeled, I now have double vision.   I am advised and  truly believe that I have other disabilities associated with my eyes.  I am advised and  truly believe that I also have a hyper extended thumb on my  right hand and I am right handed hence that is the reason that I definitely cannot effectively write by hand.  I am advised and  truly believe that  I also have the disabilities of Craniosynostosis  [Plagiocephaly] which results in a perennial tilt of my head to the right resulting in adverse painful consequences for my neck muscles.  I am advised and  truly believe that I also suffer the consequences of the disability of bilateral long bicep tenosynovitis, which condition is exacerbated by lifting and carrying.   From the combination of the adverse consequences for my neck muscles from the Craniosynostosis  [Plagiocephaly] & bilateral long bicep tenosynovitis, I have a serious disability to carrying objects and material.  The effects of each of the disabilities are inter-related and  compounded, much more than by mere summation or aggregation.

For the purpose of determining  "the Special Needs that arise from the features of my disabilities" and "the Special Measures aka Adjustments aka Mechanisms that can be employed to ACCOMMODATE those Special Needs, mostly unique  to my disabilities", I am advised and  truly believe that the appropriate experts to provide the evidence  will be a psychologist and an Occupational Therapist, after consultation by each, with me.  Perchance a District Court Judge should  opine that this constitutes an "unjustifiable hardship", then the trial cannot proceed, as the court would then be dishonouring its DUTY to provide a FAIR HEARING.

I am interested to know how the District Court plans to honour its duty in respect of accommodating my special needs.   Please advise.

All this information must be sourced by the court using its own resources.  This will need  to be a voir dire.   That
voir dire could be performed "on the papers".   I am only too willing to COOPERATE.  By this process of expert evidence, it would be expected to determine with a high degree of accuracy all Special Measures or Adjustments that are necessary to Accommodate my Special Needs due to my disabilities.  I remind the Court that these are not concessions or privileges for me but are the Duty of the Court to provide to me to provide to me the Basic proposition of our Court System and that is the Natural Justice aka Due Process of a Fair Hearing.  It is not my responsibility to organize the expert evidence.  It is the Duty of the Court to provide me a Fair Hearing and that is my RIGHT, and I DEMAND MY RIGHTS.  

Alternatively, if the prosecution, the CDPP wishes to persist, it could, under the supervision of the Court, on the Court's  order, in continuing conjunction with me, undertake this role, as it is subject to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.  All evidence should be on the court's record.  I remind the court, and the CDPP, that this should be only in regard to the preliminary matter of  Accommodation of Disability caused Special Needs and not in relation to Fitness to Plead.

I effectively move from the Bar Table, given that I am disabled and that this procedure is a Reasonable adjustment to alleviate the effects of my disability, [in fact it is the preferred option by many courts to decide matters "on the papers", that this District Court should Order:

"The District Court orders that, so as to comply with its Duty to implement a Fair Hearing, since the Defendant has raised the fact of his disability, that it will conduct a "voir dire"    with suitable experts [even "on the papers" in a "Shuttle" format], to determine the nature of the defendant's disabilities and the features of them; the Special Needs that arise from the features of the defendant's disabilities; and the Special Measures aka Adjustments aka Mechanisms that can be employed to ACCOMMODATE those Special Needs, uniquely for each defendant, so as to provide a Fair Hearing."

If the Court refuses, it will appear that the Court intends to RAILROAD  me, as Kluck was doing in the subject  ultra vires "Committal hearing", and as
DCJA Kerry John O'Brien had expressed a preference in  his decision delivered on  21 June 2011,  in  Mathews v The Commissioner of Police [2011] QDC where he said in the final sentence of Paragraph 8 in  respect of myself,  " He [Magistrate Kluck] had ample power to compel the attendance of an uncooperative defendant."  Maybe so, but was DCJA Kerry John O'Brien calling me "uncooperative"?   Well, DCJA Kerry John O'Brien should understand the difference between disability and one's being "uncooperative".   I have been far from uncooperative.  Within the abilities with which my disabilities leave me,  I have  committed vast amounts of my time co-operating with Queensland Courts, using what facilities I have, despite the FRAUD & Corruption to which I have been subjected by the Queensland Government, [as detailed below in this submission], and despite the fact that these four charges are just further cover-up deeds in this litany of cover-up by various organs of the Queensland Government, [as also detailed below sorted by DATE], attempting to coverup the armed Robbery to which I had\been  subjected by corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala, as detailed below by the date 29th November,2004.  The transcripts show that  on repeated occasions including many occasions subsequent to June 2010, Kluck M. admitted that he recognized that during the three days of the purported "Committal Hearing", I had suffered mental fatigue and  mental exhaustion.  This mental exhaustion resulted in my becoming ill and incapacitated.  This was clear and available to DCJA Kerry John O'Brien.  For whatever  private agenda had by DCJA Kerry John O'Brien, he chose to ignore it.

DCJA Kerry John O'Brien had expressed a preference in  his decision delivered on  21 June 2011,  in  Mathews v The Commissioner of Police [2011] QDC where he said in the final sentence of Paragraph 8 in  respect of myself,  " He [Magistrate Kluck] had ample power to compel the attendance of an uncooperative defendant."  Maybe so, but was DCJA Kerry John O'Brien calling me "uncooperative"?   Well, DCJA Kerry John O'Brien should understand the difference between disability and one's being "uncooperative".   I have been far from uncooperative.  Within the abilities with which my disabilities leave me,  I have  committed vast amounts of my time co-operating with Queensland Courts, using what facilities I have, despite the FRAUD & Corruption to which I have been subjected by the Queensland Government,  and despite the fact that these four charges are just further cover-up deeds in this litany of cover-up by various organs of the Queensland Government, attempting to coverup the armed Robbery to which I had\been  subjected by corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala.  The transcripts show that  on repeated occasions including many occasions subsequent to June 2010, Kluck M. admitted that he recognized that during the three days of the purported "Committal Hearing", I had suffered mental fatigue and  mental exhaustion.  This mental exhaustion resulted in my becoming ill and incapacitated.  This was clear and available to DCJA Kerry John O'Brien.  For whatever  private agenda had by DCJA Kerry John O'Brien, he chose to ignore it.

It is KNOWN & INTENTIONAL disability Discrimination by the Court and the CDPP and the CDPP's Shane Hunter to force me to have to produce this evidence at a subsequent appeal.  It will also be torture of me to force me to proceed through any court proceeding while my Special Needs are not accommodated.  

The Court is duty bound to ensure Due Process aka Natural Justice aka Procedural Fairness.  An element of Due Process is the essential provision of a Fair Hearing.  It is my submission that for a Disabled Person to be extended a fair hearing, all of his Special Needs must be accommodated with provision of Special Measures or adjustments.  The
Commonwealth's  Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA] provides that Special Needs need not be accommodated if, to do so, would involve "unjustifiable hardship".   In this case before the District Court, or in any case coram any court, if unjustifiable Hardship is claimed, then the Special Needs need not be accommodated so as not to breach the DDA nor breach  the  UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]  and UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [OP].   However, if "unjustifiable Hardship"  persists, then the Court hearing cannot continue, as the defendant is being denied the Special Measures or adjustments that would make the Hearing Fair to the defendant.  Such a situation DOES NOT MEAN that the defendant is UNFIT TO BE TRIED.  The defendant is fit to be tried but the court is just unwilling to provide the special needs that will permit the defendant to have a Fair Hearing.   If the court in that situation persists with the hearing, it is a nullity, and an unjustifiable impost, torture,  upon the defendant. That would amount  to torture under the International  Covenants regarding torture.  This was the situation in the Committal hearing coram Kluck 24th to 28th June, 2010, inclusive and in all purported mentions in that purported committal since.  I was repeatedly RAILROADED  with orders bellowed from Kluck M. to "ASK ANOTHER QUESTION".  Of course, any purported "orders" made in that committal hearing coram Kluck is also a nullity, due to the denial of Natural Justice.  It follows that the "Referral" by Kluck M. to this District Court is also a nullity, making this "hearing" pointless and an absurdity.

I effectively move from the Bar Table, given that I am disabled and that this procedure is a Reasonable adjustment to alleviate the effects of my disability, [in fact it is the preferred option by many courts to decide matters "on the papers"], that this District Court should find:

"As a consequence of the defendant Russell Mathews being denied accommodation of his Special Needs, the Purported Committal Hearing coram Kluck M. in this matter now purportedly before the District Court, the hearing coram Kluck was ultra vires and thus void ab initio.  Thus all orders purportedly made by Kluck M. are nullities also.  That includes the purported "Referral" per Sec 20 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth).  Hence, the District Court lack jurisdiction to consider the matter of my fitness to be tried or to make ANY other order in this matter, such as what should happen now.  The purported hearing coram Kluck was void ab initio  so "it cannot go back there" as it has no jurisdiction and the purported hearing is itself, a nothing.".

If this District Court persists with this "referral" regardless, the onus is upon the Court to ensure a Fair Hearing before it, and hence the provision of Special Measures, at the very least from this moment hence.  Before the Court  can provide all essential Special Measures it must know what they are.  Judges who are not experts in these matters, cannot just guess, nor make the defendant responsible for the COURT'S DUTY.  Hence, whenever disability of a defendant, when the defendant is unrepresented, is raised on the evidence  it is "foolish" for the Court of conduct a hearing unless it knows that all essential Special Measures have been provided.   It is pointless,  and  destructive,  for a court to conduct a hearing with all the time and cost to numerous parties involved if it is ultra vires  and void ab initio  when the court could have ensured so easily that all essential Special Measures were provided.

I remind the court that the court is not providing me with a privilege or a concession for which I must apply.  The Court has a DUTY, all to itself AND BY ITSELF, to ENSURE a FAIR HEARING, and to know and be certain that it is a FAIR HEARING.  All I have to do is to "raise it on the evidence" that I am disabled; to alert the court.

The CDPP's Shane Hunter is on record as suggesting that it is the defendant's responsibility to produce Sworn Evidence of my disabilities and resultant Special Needs.  The Duty is upon the court.  The court cannot encumber me with that, ITS duty.  For that matter,  it is foolish of Shane Hunter to proceed, if all special measures have not been provided.  He and the CDPP, as part of the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, is subject to the
  UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]  and UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [OP], regardless of the fact that he may have Advocates Immunity in Australia.  To proceed, when all Special Needs have not been provided, is for him, and the CDPP, and the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia,  not only futile but a breach of International Law.  He may be tempted to proceed, if he had reason to believe that he may receive a favourable albeit corrupt decision from a Court in Queensland.  Support for such suspicion could be gained from the fact that the Queensland police and Shane Hunter and the CDPP, and the Executive of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia are proceeding when it is a Fact of Law, that the police officer Henri Elias Rantala forced entry to my property and possessions when he was armed, when neither he, nor the Brisbane City Council did have the mandatory Court Order, as required by Section 160 of the Health Act 1937, under which Act the BCC purported to base its claim.

CDPP's Shane Hunter, and maybe also the court, may decide to proceed when in  fact it knows the hearing is really void ab initio, because it also knows, if that is the case, of the rampant evil in Queensland government including the courts.

I am advising the Chief Law Officer of the Commonwealth of Australia, the Attorney-General Nicola Roxon of this matter and that the Commonwealth is proceeding in contravention of its duty pursuant to
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]  and UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [OP].   I am demanding of her that the Commonwealth of Australia cease its unlawful conduct.   I am indicating now that I reserve the right to take separate legal action on this unlawful conduct.

I require a Declaration in Equity, that it is not the responsibility for a Disabled Defendant to produce Sworn Evidence of his Disabilities, Special Needs and  the requisite reasonable Special Measures aka Adjustments needed to be provided for the court to ensure Procedural Fairness aka Due Process aka Natural Justice.  I so move from the "Bar Table".

I effectively move from the Bar Table, given that I am disabled and that this procedure is a Reasonable adjustment to alleviate the effects of my disability, [in fact it is the preferred option by many courts to decide matters "on the papers", that this District Court should declare:

"The Court declares that it is not the responsibility for a Disabled Defendant to produce Sworn Evidence of his Disabilities, Special Needs and  the requisite reasonable Special Measures aka Adjustments needed to be provided for the court to ensure Procedural Fairness aka Due Process aka Natural Justice and, to comply with its DUTY to honour Natural Justice, the court must determine, once a defendant's disability is raised,  the nature of the defendant's disabilities and the features of them; the Special Needs that arise from the features of the defendant's disabilities; and the Special Measures aka Adjustments aka Mechanisms that can be employed to ACCOMMODATE those Special Needs, uniquely for each defendant, so as to provide a Fair Hearing. "

I am not an expert.  I do not know these things.  I know when I am not receiving a fair hearing.   I was not receiving a fair hearing coram Kluck.   I advised him repeatedly but he responded by harassing me,. and ridiculing me.  Kluck M. is on record as recognizing that I was not receiving a fair hearing.  Clearly, he realized the "hearing" had long become ultra vires and a nullity.  Clearly, he also realized that any "order" to police to force my attendance, would not only be a nullity, but also provocative, and an outrageous attack upon a disabled person.

The Commonwealth's  Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA] applies to this court and to the Prosecutor the CDPP and  Shane Hunter.   The CDPP and Shane Hunter are also subject to the 
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities..  Hence, if this legislation and these conventions are not honoured by the court, the CDPP and Shane Hunter or any other prosecutor, each would be operating in a legal vacuum.


   includedDDA_ExemptionProduceEvidenceAssistanceAnimals.php It is Disability Discrimination to require that a Disabled Person produce any evidence of their Disability nor any related evidence,  with this exception  of :

Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA]:  

Part 2 Prohibition of disability discrimination
Division 5 Exemptions

Section 54A  Ss(5)

 This Part does not render it unlawful for a person to request the person with the disability to produce evidence that:

/.  Even in that situation, it is not required that the evidence be Sworn in  a Court.  

Hence, it is in no way required that the defendant produce any evidence, rather than merely raise his disability "on the evidence".  It is disability discrimination and intimidatory for Shane Hunter to have been  raising that I, as the purported "defendant" in this void ab initio Committal hearing, should be responsible for producing such sworn evidence.  

Once the status of Disability has been "raised on the evidence" it is incumbent upon the court, because the onus is upon the Court to ensure a Fair Hearing to proceed  to determine the disability, the Special Needs that produces and the means by which those Special Needs can be Accommodated by the Provision of Special Measures and Adjustments.  The defendant cannot be intimidated at this time as Shane Hunter was doing repeatedly in the void ab initio purported "committal hearing" related to this "matter" in the Magistrates Court coram  Kluck.

The court cannot be of the view, that it will shirk its Fair Hearing Duty, with the view of, "We will make the defendant go the trouble of proving his disability on Appeal,  and in the meantime, we will put him through it  - just for the Hell of It."
 

I am not an expert in my disability condition, nor in the resulting special Needs nor in the Special Measures aka Adjustments to Accommodate  those Special Needs.  Hence, as it is the Court's Duty to provide the Special Measures, it must know what they are.  It cannot provide the Special Measures/Adjustment if it does not know them.  I cannot be blamed for not being the expert to know my Special Needs nor he even more difficult task to know what Special Measures or Adjustment will permit Accommodation of those Special Needs.

Because the CDPP is subject to both the DDA and   UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]  and UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [OP],  the CDPP cannot lawfully proceed, and the Court cannot permit the CDPP to breach the law, so cannot permit the CDPP to proceed.  Then, the court cannot proceed if it has no prosecution to prosecute the prosecution..  Although the District Court is not subject to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]  and UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [OP] , it must in effect act according to those conventions as the CDPP is subject to them.

If the court rejects its DUTY To Determine my Special Needs and hence its duty to know how to accommodate them, it is unlikely to subsequently accommodate  my special needs.

Judges who should disqualify themselves from having anything to do with this matter:

I effectively move from the Bar Table, given that I am disabled and that this procedure is a Reasonable adjustment to alleviate the effects of my disability, [in fact it is the preferred option by many courts to decide matters "on the papers"], that if any of the individual judges mentioned subsequently should constitute this District Court, s/he should disqualify him/herself on the grounds of apprehended bias.

[Were any one of these judges to refuse to disqualilfy him/herself, Shane Hunter or who ever appears for the CDPP, should withdraw from this hearing/mention as the CDPP is subject to both UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]  and UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [OP]  and by the CDPP's continuing, it  makes the Commonwealth of Australia be in Breach of its International Legal Obligations.   Shane Hunter and the CDPP should inquire of Nicola Roxon.]

This Second aspect to this submission is the extremely serious matter of the avoidance of apprehended bias.  Many District Court judges who are potential  judges in my matter should disqualify themselves.  This list is not necessarily exclusive.

Patsy Mary Wolfe CDCJ
Kerry John O'Brien DCJA
Ian Dearden DCJ
Marshal Irwin DCJ

Judge Leanne Clare SC
Justice Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Julie Maree Dick [not her real name - she's on the electoral roll as Julie Maree Mellifont - as the real Julie Maree Dick lives in the adjoining State and Federal Electorates and who can be considered BAIT for any violence againt this Judge]

For a start, each of these judges has been promoted, often repeatedly, by the corrupt Queensland labor Government that committed an armed robbery of me to defraud me of my beneficial ownership of my house and land that was my home by the Queensland Government, in particular by The University of Queensland by its then Registrar Douglas Porter for the joint Benefit of the University of Queensland, part of the Executive of the Government of Queensland and the joint benefit of The Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane, [CSDB] aka the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church, of which the Chief Justice Paul de Jersey is Chancellor.

There is clear evidence that I am being set up to be defrauded by Queensland courts.  Given that the main charge [cobbled together with the Dick matter] is that I am alleged to have used broadband to upload website content alleging that Henri Elias Rantala is an Armed Robber,  when  that is precisely the case;
that Henri Elias Rantala is an Armed Robber, as a matter of LAW,  on the evidence of the prosecution.  This suggests that the police and subsequently the CDPP including Shane Hunter expected a corrupt decision from the courts, or else they would not have even attempted this prosecution.  Some guidance can be had by considering Magistrate Topsy Turvy aka "Wally" [to Henri Elias Rantala, the Armed Robber], aka Walter Harvey Ehrich.   

Magistrate Kluck railroaded me for the first three days of the committal hearing related to this "appearance' in the District Court.

There is the matter of whose orders "to get rid of it"[that is on the public record] the case where I was charged with Public Nuisance, Magistrate Topsy Turvy aka Walter Harvey Ehrich or "Wally" to corrupt copper Henri Elias Rantala, was following.  Surely Topsy Turvy would not have been so amenable to "getting rid of it" without hearing any evidence, with a direction from any Tom, Dick or Harry.  Wally aka Topsy Turvy was particularly keen to follow his orders.   That begs the question of who such a person would be.   Who, much senior to"Wally" aka Topsy Turvy had an interest in this matter.   Well, it is a matter of FACT, that at that time, the theft of my house and land that was my home and owned by me as beneficiary was being orchestrated by Douglas Porter, Registrar of The University of Queensland, in his role as Representative of The University of Queensland  and Chair of St Johns College Council.  At that time, and  probably at the time of the Armed Robbery of me at my home by Henri Elias Rantala, there existed upon my home a secret clandestine Contract of Sale to the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane.  So, who is the Chancellor of 
the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane?  Surprise, surprise, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland Paul de Jersey is such an office holder.   Fancy that.   How many magistrates would deny an order from the Chief Justice?   Magistrate  Topsy Turvy is now the butt  of ridicule, and properly so; and likewise for anyone who would be associated with him.   I wonder if he will  ever wish  to redeem himself, for his benefit and the benefit of anyone foolish enough to be "close" to him, and tell publicly what he knows?    Queensland magistrate Topsy Turvey aka magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka "Wally" to his corrupt copper mate Henri Elias Rantala who committed the Armed Robbery of me at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, on 29th November, 2004,   has Judicial Immunity for everything he has done related to his actions in my case.   He has retired as a full time magistrate.    Queensland magistrate Topsy Turvey aka magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka "Wally" to his corrupt copper mate Henri Elias Rantala who committed the Armed Robbery of me at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, on 29th November, 2004,    cannot be forced to advise what he knows.    One never knows what may happen as he was effectively forced into this corrupt action by the corruption in the Queensland Courts and government.  When the corruption is so ingrained, and widespread in a network of corruption, most people would agree that he would have had no chance of exposing it.  


"Patsy" Mary Wolfe CDCJ:

CodeFrag/20120725ReasonsPatsyMaryWolfeRecuse.php

"Patsy" Mary Wolfe CDCJ:

The District Court matter, is the "Referral" per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 from the void ab initio  committal hearing coram Magistrate Paul M. Kluck.   That  purported committal hearing concerned four Commonwealth Charges, which  had the CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe as a beneficiary.  The obsequious Anthony Gett of the CDPP was an instigator of these four charges  as a preliminary attack upon me in respect of a number of judges mention on a website or websites attributed to me, where Patsy Mary Wolfe is one such.

This was indicated by ex
-copper Brendan Read under oath in the magistrates court on Day 2 of the hearing coram Kluck as:  [The transcript can be accessed by clicking here.]

include("/home/russellm/public_html/CodingPHP/includedDay2CoramKluckCopBrendanReadAdvisedAnthonyGettCDPPMoreChargesPendingFromJudges.php

Okay. How did the complaints arrive with you?   The ones that we're talking about today came to me. Yes.

Directly to you?   Yes.

[TheseFourChargesCameDirectlyToHim]

Okay. And the other complaints that you say you know of, and you mentioned in evidence     ?   Yes.

    where are they - how did they originate?   Steven Bignell, Detective Sergeant Steven Bignell advised me that there are other postings that have come to light. And he advised that the people involved in those were awaiting the outcome of this matter before they decided which way.


And you said they were Judges?   I'm not sure exactly which ones, but, yeah, I am aware that there are Judges involved   

And who was orchestrating this attack upon me? Let's see what a Qld Police officer has advised under oath.
CodeFrag/Day2CoramKluckCopBrendanReadNamesPaxtonBoothQldPoliceAnthonyGettCDPP.php

In cross-examination under oath, ex-Cop Brendan Read names LAWYERS Qld Police Solicitor Paxton Booth & CDPP's Anthony GETT

Would you normally check with your superior Officer Bignall in the case     ?   Yeah. I checked with a number of officers in the Fraud Squad and I was asked if there'd be anyone outside of the Fraud Squad that would potentially have taken out a Crimes Act search warrant. Unfortunately, it's not a common practice for the Queensland State Police to rely on Commonwealth search warrants because we normally go under the Police Powers and Responsibilities Act, as our method of conducting search warrants. I did make contact with officers, detectives from taskforce Argos because they do act under Commonwealth legislation at times. Unfortunately, their particular matters are quite sensitive and it wasn’t sort of suitable for them to be able to provide me with documentation to help in they were sort of a different focus to what I was looking at anyway. So, in that regard I had to contact - or the next point of call is to contact Commonwealth DPP.

 

Mmm?   I did speak to the Queensland Police - one of the lawyers that's employed by the Queensland Police, Paxton Booth to get his advice but he - he was the one that said it would be best talking to the Commonwealth DPP.


Okay. Who at the Commonwealth DPP?   Who was the person I spoke to?

Yes?    Anthony Gett.

As in Get, G-E-T-T?   I can't remember the exact spelling; I think it might be double T.

Communication was by what means?   Email and phone.


It is very public that CDPP's Anthony GETT and CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe were closely associated on the Organizing Committees for the 2006 Conference in Brisbane for the  International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law.

"Patsy" Mary Wolfe CDCJ stands to "gain" from this prosecution of these four charges that were in the committal hearing stage.  Qld police officer Brendan Read advised that Anthony Gett of the CDPP instigated these charge as a preliminary to similar prosecutions for a number of judges.  Patsy Mary Wolfe is mention in an uncomplimentary way on that site.  

http://haigreport.com/CorruptPoliceRantalaTranscript/20100625Day2CorruptCopRantalaMagistratesCourtCommittal.php#BerendanReadDiscussesFurtherCharges

Patsy Mary Wolfe is, it seems, comfortable guiding fraudulent cases against me to be losses to me,  as occurred coram Spender in 1991/2 for the HREOC.

An important consideration is the CDPP's Anthony Gett, who seems to want to live up to his name and "get" me, according to 
the sworn evidence of the prosecution in the committal hearing  coram Kluck for a number of judges named on  websites attributed to me.

Between 1989 and 1992, CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe when a barrister, conspired with Quentin Bryce, then Director of Qld Office of HREOC, Clare Endicott, town agent for HREOC and Jeffrey Spender, to cheat and defraud me via the justice and judicial system of our country, in a FemiNazi conspiracy which included Federal Court action QG45 of 1991 titled Mathews v. HREOC & Ors coram Spender where the Professional Misconduct and/or Unprofessional Conduct of then barrister [for HREOC and others; the only barrister appearing for any defendants] Patsy Mary Wolfe included caucusing with Federal Court Judge Jeffrey Ernest John Spender, and failing to advise the court on relevant law being that the Exhibit JJA3 to the affidavit of John Joseph Armstrong consisted of prejudicial documents made available to the HREOC decision maker Kevin O'Connor, and not to me in HREOC Tribunal hearing coram O'Connor in 1991, and which thus made the purported decision of O'Connor
void ab initio and unenforceable by Spender J.  I was unrepresented and clearly did not know the relevant law yet I advised Spender that I was not privy to the documents in JJA3 having been made available to O"Connor, the HREOC "decision maker".  This conduct towards me, and all subsequent conduct towards me, was because I am disabled.

While studying Admin Law within my Law Degree at The University of Queensland, 18 months later,  I learned that because that prejudice was in documents and not merely verbal, the decision before Spender was not merely voidable but was void ab initio and there was no way that Spender could reactivate it.  It was so obvious.  Quentin Bryce,as a trained lawyer  clearly realized that, as did Patsy Mary Wolfe and  Clare Endicott, the Town Agent for HREOC, and the Judge, Jeffrey Ernest John Spender.   

That O'Connor had been clearly prejudiced, Spender was at pains to characterise that prejudice as being  VERBAL.   Spender spoke of the HREOC parties "tic tacking" as though the prejudicial information was passed by merely verbal means.   THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT THE PREJUDICE WAS VERBAL.  Clearly, the plan was for Spender to find either explicitly or,as was the case, implicitly, that the prejudice was only verbal and so he could find against me for the benefit of his political mates, Quentin Bryce and Patsy Wolfe.

Quentin Bryce, the then Queensland Director of  HREOC and Patsy Mary Wolfe would not have even  tried to put up a case unless they were certain that Spender would defraud the legal process.   It was a continuation of the SET-UP by Quentin Bryce and the HREOC.

For the hearing coram Spender, the Affidavit of John Joseph Armstrong  should have been served on me two clear days before the hearing.   As the hearing was set for a day after Easter, 1991, the affidavit should have been served on me on Thursday, the day before Easter.  I would then have had time to read it fully.  There were approximately 1000 pages in the exhibits to that affidavit.  This included the documents in  JJA3. the prejudicial document that were provided to the HREOC Tribunal Decision Maker Kevin Patrick O'Connor.  As these documents were provided to him and not to me, his reading them made his decision unenforcible.  Clearly,  from Spender's conduct he realized this also.  Politically, for Quentin Bryce. the FEMINAZI WHORE FOR LAW CAUSE, and the HREOC, it was important that I be found guilty. 

Clare Endicott rang me on the Thursday with the excuse that because they were having trouble photocopying they would not be able to serve me before 5pm that day.  I said I was prepared to remain late, [I lived on the premises],.  She was silent for a while then spirited out, that I would not be served that day  but on Tuesday next, the day before the hearing was to commence.  Clare Endicott later lied in writing the reason that I was not served on that day.  The reason she gave, as is typical for a feminazi whore for law, was that I had purported that it was inconvenient for me to be served on the Thursday. 

The reason that these feminazi parasites wanted to serve me late, was to prevent my reading it to discover that the decision maker Kevin Patrick O'Connon was given the fictitious fabricated complaints against me, when I did not know of them, and that he made his decision based upon them.  That was the FEMINAZI WHORE FOR LAW SET-UP.   There were over 1,000 pages in all the attachments to the affidavit.  By legal precedence, the giving to a decision maker of prejudicial "evidence" in other than verbal, makes his decision void ab initio [void and unenforciable from the beginning and nothing can resurrect it].   Although, at that time I did not know of that legal precedence, I would have brought it to the attention of the judge, had I known of it.  On the last or second last day of the hearing, I did realize that O'Connor had documents presented to him, when those prejudicial documents wre unknown to me, and mentioned it to Spender, who hesitated for a short time, but then continued. 

Importantly, Clare Endicott made another major lie to me when she phoned me, and that was that I would not be disadvantaged, as there was nothing in the file that was unknown to me.   That was a mammoth lie.

If you have this parasite, this feminazi whore for law, Clare Endicott, as a decision maker in your matter before QCAT, you can expect that the establishment party will win, and you will lose.

Upon discovering that the decision was unenforcible, I began a campaign of "mailing" and faxing [ pre email days], all federal and State parliamentarians.  I was persistent sending copies of the offending prejudicial documents.   After campaigning forcefully for about 18 months, I was the target of a home invasion and assassination attempt on 16th January, 1996.  Thankfully I survived.  I spent 16 days in hospital. 
I was the target of an assassination attempt in Jan 1996 which put me in hospital for 16 days and has given me double vision, permanently.  In most cases, the injury I sustained is fatal.  My nose was kicked into my head.  I guess it would have been for the assassinator like kicking a watermelon and the feeling when the outer shell broke.  The cribriform plate which is in the centre of my head above the brain stem and through which many nerves pass was broken and displaced through 90 degrees where it still is.  That method was/is a known way of killing people.

We, at HaigReport recognize that this is a very serious matter; linking the Governor-General of Australia, Quentin Bryce to an attempted MURDER.  However, as PUBLIC MEDIA, WE HAVE A DUTY to EXPOSE CRIME, FRAUD & CORRUPTION plus Lying and Hypocrisy in Public Life .   We have "Qualified Privilege".   They have not given up previously so we do not expect them to roll over now.    They may be forced to, now or at some time in the future.  In the interim, we expect that the corrupt police, judiciary and government commissions like the Crime and Misconduct Commission, will try to continue the fraud.

Eighteen Months after Barrister Patsy Mary Wolfe [now Chief District Court Judge for Queensland], had committed professional Misconduct coram Jeffrey Ernest John Spender in the Federal Court, with his undoubted agreement, by not alerting that court [I am sure Spender already realized, and also how he and Terry Mellifont had cheated me in 1974.], to the precedent that because the documents in the "black vinyl folder" that was JJA3 in the Affidavit of John Joseph Armstrong were prejudicial to my case and provided to Kevin Patrick O'Connor in a HREOC tribunal hearing without my knowledge, the decision of O"Connor was not merely voidable but void ab initio. [In his affidavit, 
John Joseph Armstrong  referred to the documents in the "black vinyl folder" that was JJA3, as "background information".]  Hence, there was no point in Quentin Bryce's HREOC [now called the Australian Human Rights Commission - AHRC], pursuing the case in the Federal Court as it was in reality, absent fraud and Professional Misconduct by Patsy Wolfe, their barrister, an unwinnable case.  This was known to Quentin Alice Louise Bryce, Patsy Mary Wolfe and HREOC town agent Clare Endicott, [all  trained as lawyers].

I began campaigning by bulk email.  After 18 months campaigning, I was the target of an assassination  attempt at midnight Sunday, on 14th January, 1996.  I survived but was hospitalized for 16 days.  My  then superb fitness accounted for my survival. I had been working out in the Uni Gym for 18 months, and had lost 21kg of excess weight.  I had a resting pulse of 33bpm and a low blood pressure.  Had I had high or even average blood pressure, I would have bled to death.  As it was I came to four and a half hours later in a pool of blood but my injuries had closed with clotted blood..  I recognized my surroundings, but did not know whether I was in Townsville or Brisbane.   I phoned the ambulance as I was not feeling well.  This was at about 4:30am Monday, 15th January, 1996.

Police CoverUp of Attempted MURDER: So who were they protecting?  Orders from Senior Police.

My injuries were horrific.  My face was stoved in.  I came out to the ambulance.  As soon as they saw my injuries; a missing nose and black eyes and blood all over me and my face, they called the police and the police were there in a shot.  It seems to me now, all things considered, that the police were waiting for something.   Despite all my horrific injuries, as described below, the police made many excuses of why they should not investigate.  It was a coverup of crime by police.   That would not have been decided by the lower ranks of constable and senior constable.   There is a variety of types in the Queensland police Service.    After the  Armed Robbery  by corrupt copper Henri Elias Rantala two other constables, speaking TO ME of  Henri Elias Rantala said, "just because he is doing a law degree does not mean he's intelligent".  I am sure that if any junior police officer were to refuse to do some improper act, he would find himself set-up by other corrupt cops wanting to be noticed so they may receive an undeserved promotion     There is, already, antagonism within the Supreme Court of Queensland.  The corruption is in the upper levels of the police, politics, mainly labor, and courts by mainly labor appointed judges and magistrates, as with   Queensland magistrate Topsy Turvey aka magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka "Wally" to his corrupt copper mate Henri Elias Rantala who committed the Armed Robbery of me at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, on 29th November, 2004,   .

I had every bone in my head broken. The cartilage of my nose was split down the middle and a roll of cartilage was on either side of where my nose had been.  My nose bone was broken away from my facial bones and  was driven through my sinuses shattering the front third of my sinuses, so I was told in the hospital.  I asked how many breaks I had in bones and they could not tell me; as uncountable..  My cribriform plate, which is a bone in the centre of my skull above the brain stem and through which pass many nerves, was fractured and displaced through 90 degrees.The membrane around my brain was breached and cerebral spinal fluid was leaking out.  I was on massive doses of antibiotics. They said I had a chance of dying from meningitis. It is a minor proportion of people who have an injury such as this inflicted upon them, who will survive.  Even much lesser assaults are usually fatal. That  was clearly the intention.  Clearly it was planned that I would die and there would be no investigation as most assuredly, it was to be, "no suspicious circumstances".  That was clearly the orders the cops who attended had.  This attempted MURDER and the
Armed Robbery  by corrupt copper Henri Elias Rantala nearly nine years later, occurred because they thought they could treat me as a "non-person" as they had in relation to the "contract" that was put out to kill me, here in 1996.  We, at HaigReport, now know the identity of the known criminal, well known to police, who accepted the contract to kill me.  He was living in the area at the time.  

I have double vision resulting from the "remodeling" of my face.  

That begs the question of who were the people who stood to gain  had I been silenced.  Thus, people who stood to gain, are "linked" to this attempted MURDER.   There definitely was a POLICE COVERUP of the attempted MURDER.  

Subsequently, JJA3 was "sanitized" and the prejudicial documents were replaced with innocuous copies of other documents in another attachment to that affidavit.   The identical changes were made to the copy in the Federal Court Registry and to the copy with the HREOC.  [I did an FOI of HREOC for it immediately I discovered the change in the Federal Court Registry.]  Of course, all will deny it, but the real scenario can be proved in many many different ways.  I submit that had I not survived the assassination attempt, it would have been unnecessary to replace the prejudicial documents with innocuous ones.  This interference with filed documents  by multiple people is a most serious crime with international ramifications.   Thus, Quentin Alice Louise Bryce, Patsy Mary Wolfe and HREOC town agent Clare Endicott, Jeffrey Ernest John Spender and Graham Ramsay, the then Federal Court Deputy Registrar for Brisbane, are linked to many serious crimes including attempted murder, perverting the course of justice, and cutting at the very basis of our justice system.  Chief District Court Judge [CDCJ] Patsy  Mary Wolfe was "frazzled" at the Mention on 15th June, 2012, when her priors were raised in an application for her to disqualify herself.  I can assure Patsy Mary Wolfe that this will not disappear. Only a few particular points need to be proven for all this scenario of "fall into place".  There  will be quite a few more INSIGNIFICANT individuals, people other than, or  besides,  Quentin Alice Louise Bryce, Patsy Mary Wolfe and HREOC town agent Clare Endicott, Jeffrey Ernest John Spender and Graham Ramsay, the then Federal Court Deputy Registrar for Brisbane.  These minor players who were following orders will panic, but, as they will be more peripheral, they may be able to do a "deal".  However, with whom would they be able to do a deal, given the police are in the middle of this corruption as well as the CDPP, and many in the courts; [consider   Queensland magistrate Topsy Turvey aka magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka "Wally" to his corrupt copper mate Henri Elias Rantala who committed the Armed Robbery of me at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, on 29th November, 2004,   ].  That is not necessary though.  The fools who committed the perverting the course of justice crimes plus many more have not increased the difficulty of proving the judicial fraud by Quentin Bryce of HREOC, in the Federal Court, or the professional misconduct by Patsy Mary Wolfe anywhere near as much as they raised the value and benefit of proving these multiplying multiple crimes in company by many including the present Governor-General of Australia,Quentin Alice Louise Bryce..

After I survived that, the prejudicial documents were removed from JJA3 to the affidavit in the Federal Court Registry and from JJA3 at HREOC.  Had I not survived, that would not have been necessary. to remove the incriminating documents from JJA3  That points the finger at Quentin Bryce, Patsy Mary Wolfe ex-Federal Court Judge Jeff Spender for the crimes  of Attempted Murder, and Perverting the course of Justice.  Spender had Judicial Immunity for his fraudulent actions in this case.  I doubt that his
Judicial Immunity would extend to the Attempted Murder even if it was related to this case.  

The removal of the prejudicial documents from JJA3 was intended to protect Quentin Bryce, Patsy Mary Wolfe and ex-Federal Court Judge Jeff Spender.  The removal of the incriminating documents has not made proof impossible, but just more difficult.  However, the removal after I survived the assassination attempt has really upped the ante in respect of the crimes for which I wish to have Quentin Bryce, Patsy Mary Wolfe and ex-Federal Court Judge Jeff Spender convicted.  Additionally, there are so many ways in which the crimes can be proven.
   It has also involved more people in more crimes.   The removal was known to officers of the Federal Court Registry and that would have included the Deputy Registrar for Queensland Graham Ramsay, now retired.

Whoever removed those documents, did it in company.  The change had to be reflected in both the Federal Court Registry and in the records of the HREOC.  That may have happened on a regular basis, but those who did it, or at least issued the order to do it, would not be lowly staff.  It is likely that those who would have thought they would be protected would have known of the removal before it occurred..   The attempted Murder of me and the removal of these documents, even individually, raise the seriousness of this criminal fraud to a new level.   Clearly it was done to protect the perpetrators; but is the protection complete or extensive?   In fact, there is still so much evidence about, and there were many many people involved and who knew of this happening..   Because I have been involved and now have a better understanding of law, I know where there are so many pieces of highly relevant evidence.  As more coverup occurs, it will not improve the situation for the perpetrators but just tangle the web of corruption even more.   \/\/

Apart from the initial perpetrators, there are so many more people who have been "just following orders", but "just following orders" was tried as a defence at Nuremberg by the Nazi Holocaust perpetrators, but quite unsuccessfully.  There are so many people who have been hands on in the fraud and in the coverups.  Many of those involved will most assuredly not have kept it a perfect secret.  People fall out from time to time.   The exposure begins with just a single small break.  In this case, the first small break has occurred.  It was my win in the Court of Appeal on  20th July, 2010.   There would be many people previously associated, who are a little nervous about these matters.

This can all unfold in so many ways.   Is one of the central figures in this HREOC -/- Federal Court Fraud, Patsy Mary Wolfe, becoming a little distracted?  Many scalps will separate as this develops.  The realization by the involved others who are hoping for solidarity by the initial and subsequent fraudsters, of this performance [below] by Patsy Mary Wolfe in open court in my case, as per the transcript following, may  cause a little consternation, to the many co-conspiritors, especially the more lowly staff who were "just following orders".  As the case of the co-conspirators is decaying from the inside, it is not necessary for any of the "just following orders" staff to expose their part in this egregious exercise at attacking a disabled person, as is still being done with this prosecution of four charges by the CDPP's Shane Hunter.  These public sector parasites will be exposed regardless.

I sense that not too many people are "flocking" to assist Patsy Mary Wolfe to remain "unblemished", especially when they see that she is "frazzled and losing it" as indicated in her performance in open court.  I am not giving up nor going away.  .    

20120615PatsyWolfeAdmitsNotKnowingBasicCourtPrtocedure.php Following is an interesting part of the exchange, that occurred on 15th June, 2012 [see the full transcript] in the Queensland District Court between the corrupt labor government appointed and promoted Chief Judge of the District Court of Queensland Patsy Mary Wolfe, over many, more able and better qualified individuals, and a CDPP prosecutor.   Patsy Mary Wolfe admitted in open court that she did not know what she was doing regarding a basic court procedure.   That would suggest Patsy Mary Wolfe was not appointed and promoted by the corrupt labor government on MERIT.

That begs the question, with, I suggest, a predictable answer, "So why was Patsy Mary Wolfe appointed AND promoted by this corrupt labor government to be Queensland's CHIEF District Court Judge?   Patsy Mary Wolfe admitted in open court that she did not know what she was doing.

[continuing] ...
THE CHIEF JUDGE: Well, my printer gives it pages. There are 75 pages.
MR HUNTER: Seventy-five.
THE CHIEF JUDGE: Or the printer that printed this out, I should say.
MR HUNTER: Yes. There's a-----
THE CHIEF JUDGE: Whereabouts would it be?
MR HUNTER: At page 6 on my copy there's a paragraph that starts with the words, "Far be it for me to ask this Court for anything."
THE CHIEF JUDGE: Oh, I see, that's at the bottom of page 5 on mine.

MR HUNTER: Yes. And two paragraphs further on there's a reference to your Honour.
THE CHIEF JUDGE: Oh, yes, I meant to mention that. Those assertions do not affect the decision to set this matter down.
MR HUNTER: Yes, thank you, your Honour. So your Honour is effectively ruling-----
THE CHIEF JUDGE: Do you wish to say anything about that?
MR HUNTER: Is your Honour effectively ruling that you're not going to disqualify yourself for bias in respect of that submission?
THE CHIEF JUDGE: What from, setting the matter down?
[This judge Patsy Mary Wolfe has done much more at this mention then merely set it down.  She has already made "decisions" relative to my applications.]"
MR HUNTER: Yes, for making any ruling at all today.
THE CHIEF JUDGE: Of course I'm not going to disqualify myself.
[This matter has a long way to run, given the cheating of me by a number of people including this egregious woman.]

MR HUNTER: Thank you, your Honour.
THE CHIEF JUDGE: There's no substance in those allegations.
[Well, is that a challenge, I wonder?]

MR HUNTER: Thank you, your Honour.
THE CHIEF JUDGE: And what are you suggesting about that, that there is?
[This woman has lost control.  She is not thinking too clearly. These two are now talking over each other and they are both on the "same side" opposing me.]
MR HUNTER: No, no, simply that your Honour make a ruling on the record because the transcript will be-----
[This evil woman is frazzled.  At the previous mention, His Honour Griffin SC DCJ had cast doubt upon the whole basis of this case.  It is well known in the District Court (and the Court of Appeal, Government House Canberra, the Qld police, the CDPP et al)  that CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe wants me persecuted to reduce the probability of her prior egregious conduct being exposed.  Other judges do not want to be involved in debasing the District Court in this way.  This is the reason that Patsy Mary Wolfe handled this mention. Patsy Mary Wolfe and her cohorts have much to lose.  Most of the other DCJs do not.]
THE CHIEF JUDGE: No, no, no, I was aware of those, I was aware of those [repeating herself]  and-----
MR HUNTER:-----will reveal that your Honour has at least considered it.
THE CHIEF JUDGE: I'm going to give the matter a date, a trial date, and I'll also give the matter some review dates too.
MR HUNTER: Thank you, your Honour. Your Honour, I have been in contact with Mr Mathews' treating psychiatrist-----
THE CHIEF JUDGE: Yes.
MR HUNTER: -----who has provided me with a list of his availability dates. He is the only psychiatrist at the moment who is-----
THE CHIEF JUDGE: Oh, I see, that's very useful, so we'll-----
MR HUNTER: Can I hand that up to your Honour?
THE CHIEF JUDGE: Yes. What dates are they?
MR HUNTER: Oh, well, they're various pockets, so perhaps-----
THE CHIEF JUDGE: Is he available in the week commencing the 12th of November?
MR HUNTER: The 12th of November.
THE CHIEF JUDGE: We would certainly accommodate-----
MR HUNTER: The best days - in November he appears to be free, and he says his best days are Tuesdays and Wednesdays.
THE CHIEF JUDGE: Oh, right, okay. So in other words, if we set it down for the week commencing the 12th of November. So I'll set it down as trial number 1, the week commencing the 12th of November before Judge G, and the trial review is the 2nd of November. Do you anticipate, Mr Hunter, that you or Mr Mathews might wish to bring any applications pursuant to section 590AA of the Code?
MR HUNTER: I'm not sure that that's open in respect of this particular trial.
THE CHIEF JUDGE: Yes, but, well I'll tell you what I'll do.
MR HUNTER: I assume that Mr-----
THE CHIEF JUDGE: I'll set it down for review on - how about on the 31st of July, Tuesday the 31st of July, and you could confirm then - and you'll be able to advise Mr Mathews' psychiatrist of that date. Look, I'll also pencil in the week of the 19th of November for the trial, so you've got the 12th and the 19th, just so you can ascertain which is more convenient for that expert witness. And I should also - well, I'll give you some dates for reviews and when applications can be brought. Would that help?

MR HUNTER: I think at this stage, your Honour, having-----
THE CHIEF JUDGE: Well, because I understand-----
MR HUNTER: -----set aside the 31st of July-----
THE CHIEF JUDGE: -----from his papers that Mr Mathews suffers from a disability, I would like to give him the opportunity to have as much time as possible, so he can - I'll give you those dates. So on Tuesday the 31st of July, as I said, there will be a review and, you know, there will be time available for him to raise any matters that he wishes to that day and the Judge will undoubtedly give him further dates for review if the Judge considers it appropriate and useful.
MR HUNTER: Yes, your Honour.
THE CHIEF JUDGE: Okay. Is there anything else you wished to raise?
MR HUNTER: No, your Honour. Thank you.

THE CHIEF JUDGE: All right, thank you. And thank you for reminding me about that matter.  [It is not as if Hunter is any genius.]  I overlooked it in - when I was talking about trial dates but I didn't know I had to address that.  [What an admission. That is BASIC.  How incompetent is she?  Why was this incompetent promoted by a corrupt government, (that committed an Armed Robbery, relevant to this matter now in the District Court),  to be firstly a judge of the District Court, and then CHIEF judge of the District Court, over many more senior, better qualified and much  more able individuals, than her?] All right, thank you.
MR HUNTER: Thank you, your Honour.
THE CHIEF JUDGE: Adjourn the Court.
THE COURT ADJOURNED AT 10.07 A.M.




Kerry John O'Brien DCJA

CodeFrag/includedReasonsKJOB_Recuse,php

Kerry John O'Brien DCJA

I require that His Honour DCJA Kerry John O'Brien [KJOB] should recuse himself for Apprehended Bias from dealing with any matter involving me, Russell Mathews.

Because, on 15 September 2008 Judge Kerry John O’Brien was sworn in as Judge Administrator of the District Court, His Honour works closely with the Chief DCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe.  Because  DC Judge Kerry John O’Brien [KJOB] is Judge Administrator, His Honour works more closely with the Chief DCJ, than does any other DCJ.  A reasonably informed bystander would form a reasonable apprehension of bias by His Honour DCJA O'Brien towards me, because of that close working relationship with CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe, who has already shown herself to act egregiously towards me by her Professional Misconduct in the case in the Federal Court in Brisbane in  1992 coram Spender J.   As detailed on this site, CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe has acted in particularly evil malpractice towards me in 1992, when she was a barrister.

Fortunately,
District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O’Brien has already expressed precisely how he intends to mis-charaterise the evidence in this case. Regardless of whether KJOB would describe himself as a bully, or a parasite taking advantage of disabled people, [of course, I do not make such an allegation] that is the precise method of bullies; knowing that a person is disabled and disadvantaged, bullies convince themselves and anyone bothering to listen, that the person is not disabled but merely worthy and deserving of being taken down, so do precisely that,  KJOB has Judicial Immunity so nothing can be done in law with regard to this, except to expose it.   DCJA Kerry John O’Brien  showed a clear intention to railroad me taking advantage of my disability.as has been done consistently as shown on the TIMELINE of FRAUD & CORRUPTION by the Queensland Government against me, Russell Mathews, and prior to that  in the Federal Court of Australia, coram Spender J. in 1992 in Action QG45 of 1991 by Patsy Mary Wolfe, then a barrister [- with Advocates Immunity], Quentin Alice Louise Bryce, [then Queensland Director of Human Right and Equal Opportunity Commission -HREOC] and Jeffrey Ernest John Spender then Judge of the Federal Court of Australia, so having Judicial Immunity.  This judicial fraud involved many lawyers, judges and public servants so this was well known in legal circles and would be reasonably expected to be well known to  KJOB.

By my having the Sec 222 Justices Act 1886 Appeal as a "dry run", KJOB has foolishly shown his hand.  He was sucked in.   I quote in full, [with my emphasis]
Paragraph 8 of the decision delivered by DCJA KJOB on  21 June 2011,  in  Mathews v The Commissioner of police [2011] QDC; his decision in the Sec 222 Justices Act 1886 Appeal in the same matter with the precisely the same evidence:

[8] The record of proceedings below indicates that the Court made every effort to
accommodate the appellant's so called "special needs" though not, it seems, to the
appellant's satisfaction. The appellant maintains that he did not expressly raise the
issue of his fitness for trial. The Magistrate however took the view that he had done
so by his conduct, specifically, "by his conduct and what he said in Court". As
indicated above, the decision to refer the matter to the District Court was made over
the objection of the prosecuting counsel. The appellant had cross examined
witnesses over the first three days of the hearing and had asked questions designed
to establish what he saw as a possible defence to the charges. Prosecuting counsel
had submitted that the medical evidence was scant and that the appellant's conduct
was not such as to raise any issue of his fitness for trial. In my view, it would have
been clearly open to the Magistrate to continue with the committal hearing.  He had
ample power to compel the attendance of an uncooperative defendant.

[The reality of the situation in the Magistrates Court is that Magistrate Paul M. Kluck realized that he had denied me, the defendant, a fair hearing because of my disabilities, principally, my brain damage, which prevents me from performing mental tasks for long at any one time, due to rapid onset and severe fatigue which is quickly followed by mental exhaustion and incapacity.  By monitoring my performance, and composing text for short periods repeated over time, and being able to re-read and edit, I can produce a written argument, such as this, but it take me much longer.   Kluck M. realized that the whole hearing was a nullity and that any decision he made from that moment in time - and for long before - was also a nullity. Clearly this is the reason he did not make any orders to compel my attendance.  Kluck knew what powers he had to issue warrants; he mentioned it often as did the CDPP prosecutor Shane Hunter.  Kluck should have found that the hearing had become a nullity and concluded the hearing.   Lacking in confidence, he just wanted someone else to decide.  That was the point of his decision, albeit an ultra vires [nullity] decision,  to refer it to the District Court for someone else to decide].

This was foolish of KJOB to "show his hand" in this way, as it was totally unnecessary, for him to be able to dismiss my appeal as clearly he wished to do.  Clearly, KJOB could not help himself.  We can later consider his possible reasons, but first we shall dissect that paragraph.

KJOB stated in his final sentence of that Paragraph 8 in  respect of myself,  " He [Magistrate Kluck] had ample power to compel the attendance of an uncooperative defendant."  Maybe so, but was DCJA Kerry John O'Brien calling me "uncooperative"?   Well, DCJA Kerry John O'Brien should understand the difference between disability and one's being "uncooperative".   I have been far from uncooperative.  Within the abilities with which my disabilities leave me,  I have  committed vast amounts of my time co-operating with Queensland Courts, using what facilities I have, despite FRAUD & CORRUPTION to which I have been subjected by the Queensland Government,  and despite the fact that these four charges are just further cover-up deeds in this litany of cover-up by various organs of the Queensland Government, attempting to coverup the armed Robbery to which I had\been  subjected by corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala.  The transcripts show that  on repeated occasions including many occasions subsequent to June 2010, Kluck M. admitted that he recognized that during the three days of the purported "Committal Hearing", I had suffered mental fatigue and  mental exhaustion.  This mental exhaustion resulted in my becoming ill and incapacitated.  This evidence was clear and available to DCJA Kerry John O'Brien.  For whatever  private agenda had by DCJA Kerry John O'Brien, he chose to ignore the evidence.     The conclusive aspect in regard to KJOB making this statement is that he had absolutely NO EVIDENCE on which to base it.  In fact the evidence supported the opposite view.

So, whom is KJOB trying to impress?  Is/was he trying to impress the corrupt labor government [now they have gone] or Patsy Mary Wolfe?  

His view is patently wrong, to characterise my disabilities as my being uncooperative,as though I have any control over the extent of my brain damage.   If this was the intention of KJOB, he was foolish to show his hand as such was unnecessary to dismiss that Sec222 appeal.  This realization may anger KJOB.  If he is angry at this realization, he should be careful  not to direct it at me.  Because there is that reasonable apprehension that he may, he should disqualify himself from having anything to do with any case involving myself.

Because I am isolated and vulnerable, I do not expect anyone at all will want to support me, but the crooks in the Queensland police and Queensland Government Commissions and courts, all of whom have cheated and defrauded me, because I am disabled and so an easy target, will have their own enemies who wish to be promoted over them, [or are unhappy that these crooks have been promoted by the corrupt labor government for questionable reasons]. These enemies may be their fellow travelers.  These fellow travelers who are not genuine friends with the improperly promoted, still have perfected that act, of keeping their enemies closer than anyone else, so they can assist in their exposure.  They may see this as their opportunity.  They will be happy to replace them and be promoted over them.  They may have their judicial or advocates immunity, but the truth of their evil towards the disabled in public life can be exposed and has been and is being exposed, as with   Queensland magistrate Topsy Turvey aka magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka "Wally" to his corrupt copper mate Henri Elias Rantala who committed the Armed Robbery of me at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, on 29th November, 2004,   .

Since recognition by the courts of my disability is central to my receiving a fair hearing, KJOB's blatant blindness to the many instances of both those occurrences coram Kluck and the separate recognitions by Kluck, KJOB is clearly predisposed to denying me accommodation of my Special Needs so denying me a fair hearing but improving the chances that PMW [Chief DCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe] will benefit by my conviction.  Such could possibly be in a misguided attempt to curry favour and gain promotional advantage by supporting PMW, but what will other DCJs think?

KJOB's  disgusting denigration of disability is unforgivable, especially as he is a Judicial officer in an Australian Court.  This shows his character.   KJOB has belittled and ridiculed my disability and denigrated me with his sarcastic ill defined terms,  
"every effort",  " so called",  "it seems" and by putting   "special needs" in  quotes, in his first sentence of that paragraph in the phrase,  "every effort to accommodate the appellant's so called "special needs" [in  quotes] though not, it seems, ... "

We must realize that these were not just ill considered off the cuff remarks.  These were considered deliberate expressions in a prepared written decision.  Obviously, it was written to be offensive to me and to be a lie and intended to denigrate and ridicule me.   This series of incendiary comments by Queensland District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien brings the District Court of Queensland into disrepute.

So who does this KJOB think he is?  For me, living is very difficult and has been for 45 years with my brain damage and other disabilities.   I have strived to cope.  Parasites and bullies see disabled persons as easy targets to attack and so have repeatedly attacked me.  This has included many of the parasites associated with or attached to the labor government, beginning with "labor lawyers" Terry Mellifont and Jeffrey Ernest John Spender in 1974.  Clearly, this ... KJOB is doing the same, no doubt because he thinks it will be easy, and he is a judge with judicial immunity he apparantly thinks he can do as he likes.  [Largely with Judicial Immunity, he can do as he likes, so the courts are a free for all for corrupt appointees of the corrupt labor government.]
,
There is no evidence for KJOB to express those views.  In fact, when the evidence is finally viewed, the extent of my disability will be proven, and prove his comments to be ridicule and denigration of me.   It would be expected that KJOB would do all he could to prevent that evidence being considered.  This is just one more instance of probable bias by KJOB. 

Clearly, KJOB is opposing me,and putting himself on the same side as those who have attempted to MURDER ME in 1996 and to those who perverted justice in 1991/92. [including his "boss" CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe]  and those who removed and replaced the prejudicial documents in JJA3 in the Federal Court Registry and HREOC offices, after the attempt to murder me had been unsuccessful, when it would have been UNnecessary if I had been murdered. 

KJOB could be expected to oppose a void dire as that would prove his prejudice re my Special Needs and beg the question of his reasons, and character.

Clearly we had a corrupt Queensland Government who promoted PMW to be a DCJ and subsequently to the CDCJ.   Considering her performance in open court on 15th June, 2012 when she admitted she did not know what she was doing regarding a basis matter of court procedure, her promotion was not for merit.


Ian Dearden DCJ

Prior to his becoming a DCJ, Ian Dearden, no doubt to gain publicity and attract attention, took it upon himself to denigrate and defame me publicly. When a person is disabled, isolated and vulnerable, as I am, this is very easy and so practiced predominately by lowlife bullies and parasites.   It is not news to me nor I guess to anyone, that my being disabled with multiple disabilities made me an easy target,  even  easier to Ian Dearden.   It is a reasonable proposition that he would want to seem consistent, and so continue to be biased against me, because he would undoubtedly say I deserved his previous denigration of me and that I deserved it still.  A reasonably informed bystander would most assuredly have a reasonable apprehension of bias by Ian Dearden towards me.

Marshal Irwin DCJ

On 6th March, 2008 Chief Magistrate Marchall Irwin publicly extolled the virtues and merits of the police solicitor Colin John Strofield caucusing with all magistrates and termed caucusing  as "liaison".  At the swearing in of Strofield as a Magistrate at  BRISBANE on 06/03/2008 Marshall Irwin DCJ who was also Chief Magistrate expressed approval of what is a most egregious practice  of caucusing:

I quote:

"It is in this capacity as Queensland Police Service solicitor that I, [Judge Marshall Irwin] and other Magistrates, have had a close contact with his Honour [Magistrate Colin John Strofield] because he was the principal point of liaison for us with the Queensland Police Service and as a result it has been possible to resolve a number of 'issues', which obviously arise from time to time in the administration of a Court which relate to the Queensland Police Service in the mutual interests of both the Court, the Police Service and the community [as clearly an afterthought, having a sense of what he was saying] through Colin's involvement and his advice and the application of the common sense  which I have mentioned previously."

So caucusing is now called "liaison".

 Queensland magistrate Topsy Turvey aka magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka "Wally" to his corrupt copper mate Henri Elias Rantala who committed the Armed Robbery of me at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, on 29th November, 2004,    Queensland magistrate Topsy Turvey aka magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka "Wally" to his corrupt copper mate Henri Elias Rantala who committed the Armed Robbery of me at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, on 29th November, 2004,   .  Clearly also, was the fact that he was speaking "off the cuff" and spoke  of "mutual Interest of both" and clearly, he was thinking of only the magistrates and the police and stuff the community.   He was thinking ahead a little but obviously not far enough.  He realized he was excluding the "community" from his speech.   That is obviously how he thought. but realized how that sounded but only after he had said "mutual Interest of both".  Hence, he decided he should include "the community" and hoped no one would notice.   His real sentiment is now on the record.  This strongly suggest Marchall Irwin DCJ is firmly on the side of corrupt magistrates like /.

 Queensland magistrate Topsy Turvey aka magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka "Wally" to his corrupt copper mate Henri Elias Rantala who committed the Armed Robbery of me at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, on 29th November, 2004,   Police caucusing with magistrates is corruption..  The police and magistrates who engage in that are corrupt.  It is understandable as they would see each other and interact most days of the working week. A reasonably  informed bystander would certainly suspect that Marchall Irwin was on the side of corrupt police and corrupt magistrates.  Rantala was clearly corrupt to do the armed robbery, and to arrest me for no good reason at the time of the armed robbery .  was clearly corrupt to treat me in such an egregious way.  Given the character of the judge Marchall Irwin, who made the above statement, giving a reasonably informed bystander the idea that he supports corruption, and the reasonably informed bystander understanding that I was arrested by a corrupt cop and convicted wrongly by a Magistrate acting clearly wrongly twice in relation to myself,.it would be a reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of the independent  third party..  Hence, were Marchall Irwin DCJ to be the decision maker in my matter, he should disqualify himself.
 
Judge Marshall Irwin was then Chief Magistrate and was a Judge of the District Court, which role he still has, 

Justice Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Julie Maree Dick

Julie Maree Dick is not her real name.  She's on the electoral roll as Julie Maree Mellifont.   The real Julie Maree Dick [wife of John Dick], lives in the adjoining State and Federal Electorates.  Clearly, the real Julie Maree Dick can be considered BAIT for any possible violence againt this Judge by a dissatisfied defendant or relative of such defendant. [Iwill neverresortto violence.] If judges and the government do to others what has and is being done to me, I suspect that violence is a real possibility for any of these others.  Surely, I would not be the only person who has been cheated and defrauded by this Queensland labor government in  association with individuals whom, that government then knows it can promote to the Judiciary and maybe to Governor of Queensland and  or Governor General of Australia..

includedReasonsJulieMareeMellifontShouldRecuseHerself.php
The purpose of these paragrahs is to show the reason that "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Maree Dick should disqualify herself from any hearing involving Russell Mathews, [or involving anyone else at all, for that matter].  The legal test of 'bias' is that of "apprehended bias"; that is that a "reasonably informed bystander" would have a "reasonable apprehension of bias" possessed by the decision maker towards the individual the subject of the "decision maker's" "DELIBERATIONS".

I intend to expose, well continue to expose, her corrupt husband Terence Joseph Mellifont for his fraud of me.  I also intend to expose the corruption of the Queensland labor government that promoted her.  It could be reasonably apprehended that "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Maree Dick likes the status quo and would like it to continue.  Because of her "association" with a criminal [she has had kids by him; many hids] and repeated promotion by a corrupt government, "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Maree Dick could be reasonably apprehended to try to stop me for her own eventual survival.

I do not think her marrying a criminal and her, Julie Maree Mellifont's, being promoted by a corrupt labor government is a good recommendation for a judicial appointment to a Court of Law.

This Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Maree Dick married a criminal.   She was appointed to be judge of the District  by a corrupt labor government.  For some of that time since she married [or became common law wife - she is on the electoral roll as Julie Maree Mellifont], of Terry  Mellifont, she was living in a house having chil\dren  to Mellifont when all or a large proportion of the money coming into that household was corrupt money, on the basis of evidence to the Fitzgerald Commission.   Judge Julie Maree Mellifont would have been living off the proceeds of crime.  


Julie Dick was admitted as a barrister of the Supreme Court of Queensland on the 18th of December 1975.   The case,
 Mellifont v. The Queensland Law Society Incorporated [1981 QdR 17], 
became the classic case for the removal of a solicitor from the Admitted roll of solicitors.   Julie Mellifont is likely to have studied the case of Mellifont's being struck off the roll of practicising solicitors; the termination of his role of solicitor.   It could seem that that was what attracted her, Julie Maree Mellifont, to the FRAUD Terry Mellifont


We note: "For a period of three years,  Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Maree Dick was the Government appointment to the Podiatrists Board of Queensland where she was expected to give day to day legal advice to the Board."  With her weight she probably had an affinity with Podiatrists. 

Terence Joseph Mellifont the ex-solicitor who was struck off in 1980 was described by the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Queensland as:

deceitful, dishonest, dishonourable.


That was the unanimous finding of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Queensland in the decision

 Mellifont v. The Queensland Law Society Incorporated [1981 QdR 17].


This Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick is aka Judge Julie Maree Dick.  She is married to lying cheating criminal parasite who, previously, was proud to be a "labor lawyer"; Terence Joseph Mellifont aka, Terry Mellifont of his sole solicitor practice TJ Melifont & Co.   This incompetent fraudulent criminal parasite, colluded, in 1974, with the then barrister Jeffrey Ernest John Spender who later became a Federal Court Judge, appointed by a Corrupt labor Federal Government, to cheat me of a major sum of money, when I was severely adversely affected with my brain damage and undiagnozed Obstructive Sleep Apnoea [OSA].   In 1980, the lowlife Terence [Terry] Mellifont was struck off the roll of solicitors in Queensland by the full court of the Supreme Court of Qld for his fraudulent corrupt behaviour.   In 1990, parasite Terence Joseph [Terry] Mellifont was being prosecuted by the Fitzgeral Commission for his perjury. [His argument was that he, Mellifont could perjure himself to the Fitzgerald Commission because he reckoned the perjured evidence was outside the terms of referenceof the Fitzgeral Commission]. A District Court Judge, possibly a corrupt mate of the corrupt Mellifont was about to dismiss the prosecution, for Mellifont's reason, when the Fitzgerald Commission who were prosecuting, entered an
nolle prosequi. before the judge sdismissed it, which was effectively discontinuing the prosecution, so they coulc continue it later.  Terence Joseph Mellifont had perjured himself before the Fitzgerald Inquiry re his SP bookie "business" with corrupt police protection.   The Fitzgeral Commission prosecutor formally asked the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Qld, Sitting as the Court of Criminal Appeal if that argument was valid...Mellifont was advised that if the Full court was of the view that that view by Melllifont was invalid, he, Mellifont, would be charged again.   To delay the prosecution, Mellifont had made a knowingly fruitless appeal to the High Court.  As soon  as the labor stooge Wayne Goss came to power, he shredded the Heiner papers and terminated the Fitzgerald Commission [to save his corrupt mate Mellifont] and replaced it with the corrupt CJC which later merged with the Crime Commission to become the CMC.   It is an accepted view that the Heiner Inquiry was investigating labor pedophiles interfering with Wards of the State of Queensland.   Everyone would be of the view that Julie Maree Mellifont will be disadvantaged if here husband Terence Joseph Mellifont is prosecuted and convicted.  That would be something the Corrupt labor government could hold to ensure Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick did their bidding.  She would have an interest  in ensuring that the CJC did not continue with the Fitzgerald Commission prosecution of her husband.  Was that the reason that in  March  1998,  "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Maree Dick  was the  first  Parliamentary Criminal  Justice Commissioner  appointed for  the  State  of Queensland? 

A pro pos the Heiner Inquiry:  Investigative Journalist Piers Akerman noted in his article published on Saturday, April 26, 2008 and  entitled "Taint sticks to Quentin Bryce" in which he details the allegations and prospective charges specified in the nine-volume Rofe Audit, by leading Sydney barrister David Rofe, QC, into the long-running and unresolved Heiner Affair involving approval by the Goss Cabinet in 1990 of the illegal shredding of documents relating to investigations into allegations of child abuse at a Brisbane detention centre. Piers Akerman also noted that the Queensland Parliament's PCMC now held evidence alleging prima facie criminality against Judge Julie Dick
Of course,  with the corrupt labor then holding a magority in the Queensland Legislative Assembly, nothing has  come of that evidence.

It is an accepted view that the Heiner Inquiry was investigating labor pedophiles interfering with Wards of the State of Queensland.  Was  "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Maree Dick appointed a Judge of the Children's Court of Queensland in 2001 and then in 2007 to be the President of theChildren's Court of Queensland to ensure that any word of labor pedophiles was totally suspressed.  Did this have anything to do with the Merri Rose - Peter Beattie Extortion "threat" and secret?   If Merri Rose knew, how many other do you think will also know?   What happens if this "secret" is published in detail on a website not in Australia from an internet user not in Australia?  If it is the truth?

It is the fact that this lowly District Court Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Maree Dick has been repeatedly promoted by this corrupt labor Queensland government.  If challenged, we can easily prove the corruption of the Queensland labor government

We doubt that would have occurred if she had exposed the corruption or threatened to so do, or the corrupt members of the corrupt Queensland labor Government were other than confident that she would not expose any of the widespead corruption in  Queensland.  It is not as if she was the only or brightest possible candidate for the promotions.  So, why was "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Maree Dick the one promoted at that time?   None of the judicial promotions are great jurists on any international scale.


It is interesting that "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Maree Dick does use the pseudonym Julie Maree Dick, well publicly at least.     
Corrupt parasite Mellifont is the husband of  lowly District Court Judge Julie Maree Mellifont who happens to go, publicly, by her maiden name of Julie Maree Dick;  we wonder the reason for her name change and importantly, the reason the corrupt labor government appointed Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick to be a judge of the District Court.  This is in particular very interesting, as there happens to be a woman whose married name is Julie Maree Dick - exactly the same spelling, - who happens to live in the next suburb to Judge Julie Maree Mellifont, and who is scared out of her wits that some defendant or defendant's relative or accomplice, who is particularly displeased with some Decision of Judge Julie Maree Mellifont going under the name publicly of her real name of Julie Maree Dick, will attack the real Julie Maree Dick, thinking she is the Judge who is practicing under that pseudonym.  Terence Joseph Mellifont had perjured himself before the Fitzgerald Inquiry re his SP bookie "business" with corrupt police protection. 


Does "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Maree Dick  feel somewhat reassured knowing that if thee is some aggrieved defendant  wish "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Maree Dick some harm, the REAL Julie Maree Dick may be BAIT so that "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Maree Dick  is one more step removed from being injured.  Maybe, it is her  husband the criminal fraudster who feels that his home is one more step removed from a disgruntled litigant.

Not only is Terry Mellifont a fraud, he is dumb into the bargain. In 1974, he was so concerned and involved with setting me up, when I was ostensibly his client, that he forgot to even complete the semblance of  proper conduct of his profession for me, his Client, that Terence Joseph Mellifont, forgot to even take my statement, the basic, fundamental step in performing his role, conducting my appeal.  38 years later, I still have extremely good evidence of this, including that this was known to Spender.


Judge Leanne Clare SC

PHPincludesDistrictCourtKerryOBrien/includedLeanneJoyClare.php http://HaigReport.com/images/20120709LeanneClareDPP_tn207x400.jpgre Leanne Joy Clare nee HURLEY

The purpose of this page is to show the reason that "Her Honour" DCJ Leanne Joy Clare should disqualify herself from any hearing involving Russell Mathews, [or involving anyone else at all, for that matter].  The legal test of 'bias' is that of "apprehended bias"; that is that a "reasonably informed bystander" would have a "reasonable apprehension of bias" possessed by the decision maker towards the individual the subject of the "decision makers" "DELIBERATIONS".

We believe she, this lowly District Court Judge Leanne Joy Clare nee HURLEY is just a "small cog" in  the  "corruption wheel that is Queensland".  The least that is expected of these 'small cogs' is that they will do nothing to expose the corruption, and they can still "prosper".

I will place at the base of this commentary the [unfortunate for Leanne Joy Clare] short transcript of her hearing in the District Court, of my appeal of what the Court of Appeal later called an "egregious" episode before the parasite magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka Topsy Turvy which CA decision became, according to the Brisbane Daily Newspaper, the Courier Mail, as "Talkof the Legal World".

The gravamen of that case was in fact a very simple propositionA magistrate cannot sentence a person, by applying the "Penalty and Sentences Act", BEFORE the defendent's guilt has been established by proper legal process.  Apparently, this simple proposition was too difficult for this lowly District Court Judge Leanne Joy Clare nee HURLEY.   The Court of Appeal could readily understand that, s could most high school students of Legal Studies.

Of course, the purpose of his, Topsy Turvy's actions was to pervert the course of justice.   Clearly, he had been ordered to "get rid of it" in his own words.  Read his words over FIVE years earlier.   Of course, this begs the Quesstion:  "Whose Order would this malicious magistrate be so eager to obey?"   A Guide may be to understand who may have stood to gain.  This bogus arrest of me was part of the greater plan  to steal my home, the house and land that I owned, from me.  Had Magistrate Topsy Turvy permitted the case to be heard, it would have been shown that the Brisbane City Council did not have the requisite Court Order.  The law is a simple proposition.  The legislation, current at that time, mandated that entry was prohibited without a court order. The legal title of my house and land is now in the name of the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Briabane [CSDB] aka the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican  Church [BDAC].

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland Paul deJersey is the Chancellor of the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Briabane [CSDB]   We believe the "order" to Magistrate Topsy Turvy came directly or indirectly from the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland Paul deJersey.

All these "arrangements" are well known within legal circles.  That is one of the reasons that this was mentioned cryptically in the Courier Mail Newspaper.  Does anyone think that this lowly District Court Judge Leanne Joy Clare nee HURLEY, would want to 'rock the boat' of the Chief Justice. We belioeve  that this lowly District Court Judge Leanne Joy Clare nee HURLEY is either corrupt [fellow traveller type] or incompetent [or partly both].  Admittedly, District Court Judge Leanne Joy Clare nee HURLEY is not the keenest knife in the draw.  Afterall, her LLB is from QUT, which does have a lower entry standard than the other major University in Brisbane, The University of Queensland.[UQ] [although UQ is one of the major sources of corruption in Queensland]. [Afterall, no-one can trust the UQ.]  By far, the brighter law undergraduates 'gravitate' to UQ.  However, this is such simple proposition, we suspect that this lowly District Court Judge Leanne Joy Clare nee HURLEY simply relied upon her Judicial Immunity.

It is the fact that this lowly District Court Judge Leanne Joy Clare nee HURLEY has been repeatedly promoted by this corrupt labor Queensland government.  If challenged,we can easily prove the corruption of the Queensland labor government.  We doubt that would have occurred if she had exposed the corruption or threatened to so do, or the corrupt members of the corrupt Queensland labor Government were other than confident that she would not expose any of the widespead corruption in  Queensland.  It is not as if she was the only or brightest possible candidate for the promotion.  So, why was Leanne Joy Clare the one promoted at that time?
        
While she was Qld DPP, we challenged this lowly Leanne Joy Clare nee HURLEY to continue the prosecution of labor ex-lawyer Terence Joseph Mellifont.who was, circa 1980 struck off the roll of solicitors in Queensland by the full court of the Supreme Court of Qld for his fraudulent corrupt behaviour.  [Mellifont is the husband of yet another lowly District Court Judge Julie Maree Mellifont who happens to go, publicly, by her maiden name of Julie Maree Dick;  we wonder the reason for her name change and importantly, the reason the corrupt labor government appointed Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick to be a judge of the District Court.]  [Interestingly, there happens to be a woman whose married name is Julie Maree Dick - exactly the same spelling, - who happens to live in the next suburb to Judge Julie Maree Mellifont, and who is scared out of her wits that some defendant or defendant's relative or accomplice, who is particularly displeased with some Decision of Judge Julie Maree Mellifont going under the name publicly of Judge Julie Maree Dick, will attack the real Julie Maree Dick, thinking she is the Judge practicing under a pseudonym.]  Terence Joseph Mellifont had perjured himself before the Fitzgerald Inquiry re his SP bookie "business" with corrupt police protection.   To delay the prosecution, Mellifont had made a knowingly fruitless appeal to the High Court.  As soon  as the labor stooge Wayne Goss came to power, he shredded the Heiner papers and terminated the Fitzgerald Commission [to save his corrupt mate Mellifont] and replaced it with the corrupt CJC which later merged with the Crime Commission to become the CMC.   Anyway, while Queensland Director of Public Prosecutions, Leanne Joy Clare declined to continue the prosecution of the criminal Terence Joseph Mellifont. 

A pro pos the Heiner Inquiry:  Investigative Jouirnalist Piers Akerman noted in his article published on Saturday, April 26, 2008 and  entitled "Taint sticks to Quentin Bryce" in which he details the allegations and prospective charges specified in the nine-volume Rofe Audit, by leading Sydney barrister David Rofe, QC, into the long-running and unresolved Heiner Affair involving approval by the Goss Cabinet in 1990 of the illegal shredding of documents relating to investigations into allegations of child abuse at a Brisbane detention centre. Piers Akerman also noted that the Queensland Parliament's PCMC now held evidence alleging prima facie criminality against Her Honour Leanne Clare.. Of course,  with the corrupt labor then holding a magority in the Queensland Legislative Assembly, nothing has  come of that evidence.

Leanne Joy Clare's association with legal and judicial criminal rogues

Anthony Gett, lawyer/prosecutor of the Commonwealth DPP Uses the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law To Promote Evil Wicked Fraud:

We should consider the rogues [we are not claiming all are rogues] on the two "Committees" for the august sounding 20th International Conference of the even more augustsounding International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law, [2-6 July, 2006] with the ironic motto, ironic, given some of the individuals involved in the "Committees",

"Justice for all - Victims, Defendants, Prisoners and the Community"  - really??
Anthony Gett has a particular place in regard to these for Charges.  He was instrumental in initiating them as detailed by Queensland police under oath.

http://HaigReport.com/DocumentaryEvidence/20110218InternationalSocietyForTheReformOfCriminalLaw_AnthonyGettJeffreySpenderPatsyWolfePauldeJersey_01_cr.jpgClearly, is the lowest "ranked" individual in this group.  Clearly, he believed that I, or this website HaigReport, is attacking many of these individuals.
SpenderCallinandeJersey, Wolfe, Leanne Clare, and Judge Marchall  Irwin
so Anthony Gett decided that as these people had been promoted by a corrupt labor government,  Anthony Gett would become their GoTo sychophant so they would put in a "good word" so the same corrupt government might promote him.

See involvement of the obsequious Anthony Gett: here here

This obsequous sychophant was not only wanting to grovel to these individuals promoted by a corrupt labor governent at this conference, but later, when HaigReport was attacking the individuals, he could again be shown to be worthy of a "good word" by initiating this Queensland police chare upon me. 

It is aready on the record that these charges were inadvance of other charges of me to protect judges mentioned adversely on HaigReport.

Qld police Brendan Read Confirmed, under Oath, That Judges Are Waiting In The The Wings To Pursue Charges

The major problems this produces for Leanne Joy Clare nee HURLEY, are twofold.  It is not only her association with the obsequous Gett [rather than GoTo, eh?] but her closer association with the other judges in this group and who are listed on HaigReport.  [Maybe, HaigReport should look closer at the other judges and lawyers  listed on these committees.]

We have repeatedly referred to this challenged lowly Leanne Joy Clare nee HURLEY with her maiden name of Hurley.  We have sourced that from a "research" paper on the QUT [Queensland University of Technology]  website of some feminist "research" babble for some female to gain a "research" masters [no doubt from a feminist "lecturer"] about a number of promoted feminists. Since it merely reports facts and does not involve any difficult processes, like logic, we fell confident to report it as probably true.  This lowly Leanne Joy Clare nee HURLEY is said to have been born in Ipswich in1962 to a Frank Hurley.  It is a fair assumption that with the name Frank, they are all catholics  whose priests, like the Albanian muslim priests of Kosovo, promoted the practice of large families to rob others outside their "tribe" of wealth by the "democratic" process.  Thus, she is likely to have numerous close relatives named "HURLEY".

The episode involving Leanne Clare that springs to mind involves Parasite Pig Snr Sgt Chris HURLEY who was the Palm Island killer of  Mulrunji Doomadgee on 19th November,  2004.   That begs the question:, "Why,  as DPP would she, Leanne Clare [nee HURLEY], not charge her NAMESAKE?"   We do not know of a close family relationship, but also, we do not know that they are unrelated.  Given the likelihood of many close catholic relatives named "HURLEY" there is likelihood that needs to be addressed by DCJ Leanne Clare [nee HURLEY]. .If any of our readers know of a family relationship, please let us know
 
One "defence" of that decision by Leanne Joy Clare nee HURLEY to not charge her family namesake, is that the CMC [Crime and Misconduct Commission] had come to the same conclusion.   Well, the CMC is corrupt throughout and was established by Wayne Goss to be corrupt, but to do so in the way to protect his side of politics.  [Yet, the LNP is too gutless to expose this corruption.]

DISTRICT COURT
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
JUDGE CLARE SC
No 671 of 2010
RUSSELL GORDON HAIG MATHEWS Appellant
and
HENRI RANTALA Respondent  [of Rantala-Gate infamy]
BRISBANE
..DATE 19/03/2010
ORDER
1-2 ORDER

HER HONOUR: Mr Mathews applies for an extension of time to
appeal against a conviction for public nuisance. In truth,
there is no conviction to appeal. This is because the matter
has already been corrected. The finding of guilt was reopened
and the charge was dismissed in 2008. Mr Mathews is concerned
that the reopening affected only his sentence but not the
conviction. The conviction has actually been removed from his
criminal history. The absence of a standing conviction means
that there is nothing to appeal.
The application for an extension of time therefore must be
refused.
While Mr Mathews is concerned about the validity of the
process by which he was exonerated, this ruling should serve
as a formal confirmation and a public record of the fact that,
at this point in time, Mr Mathews does not have a conviction
for public nuisance.
On the 1st of June 2005 a magistrate found Mr Mathews guilty
of creating a public nuisance on the 29th of November 2004.
That finding of guilt was an error. The matter was corrected
three years later on the 1st of December 2008 when the same
magistrate moved to reopen his ruling and revoke his finding
of guilt.
The prosecution later offered no evidence against Mr Mathews.
Because there was no evidence against him the charge of public
nuisance was dismissed and the magistrate discharged
Mr Mathews. This was on the 17th of December 2008. The
matter was finalised on that date.
Mr Mathews is not guilty of the public nuisance offence with
which he was charged in 2004.




I effectively move from the Bar Table, given that I am disabled and that this procedure is a Reasonable adjustment to alleviate the effects of my disability, [in fact it is the preferred option by many courts to decide matters "on the papers", that this District Court should find:

Eighteen Months after Barrister Patsy Mary Wolfe had committed professional Misconduct coram Jeffrey Ernest John Spender in the Federal Court, with his undoubted agreement, by not alerting that court [I am sure Spender already realized, how he and Terry Mellifont had cheated me in 1974.], to the precedent that because the documents in the "black vinyl folder" that was JJA3 in the Affidavit of John Joseph Armstrong were prejudicial to my case and provided to Kevin Patrick O'Connor in a HREOC tribunal hearing without my knowledge, the decision of O"Connor was not merely voidable but void ab initio.  Hence, there was no point in Quentin Bryce's HREOC [now called the Australian Human Rights Commission - AHRC], pursuing the case in the Federal Court as it was in reality, absent fraud and Professional Misconduct by Patsy Wolfe, their barrister, an unwinnable case.  This was known to Quentin Alice Louise Bryce, Patsy Mary Wolfe and HREOC town agent Clare Endicott.


I began campaigning by bulk email.  After 18 months campaigning, I was the target of an assassination  attempt at midnight Sunday, on 15 January, 1996.  I survived but was hospitalized for 16 days.  My  then superb fitness accounted for my survival.   Subsequently, JJA3 was "sanitized" and the prejudicial documents were replaced with innocuous copies of other documents in another attachment to that affidavit.   The identical changes were made to the copy in the Federal Court Registry and with HREOC.  Of course, all will deny it, but the real scenario can be proved in many many different ways.  I submit that had I not survived the assassination attempt, it would have been unnecessary to replace the prejudicial documents with innocuous one.  This interference with filed documents  by multiple people is a most serious crime with international ramifications.   Thus, Quentin Alice Louise Bryce, Patsy Mary Wolfe and HREOC town agent Clare Endicott, Jeffrey Ernest John Spender and Graham Ramsay, the then Federal Court Deputy Registrar for Brisbane, are linked to many serious crimes including attempted murder, perverting the course of justice, and cutting at the very basis of our justice system.  Chief District Court Judge [CDCJ] Patsy  Mary Wolfe was "frazzled" at the Mention on 15th June, 2012, when her priors were raised in an application for her to disqualify herself.  I can assure Patsy Mary Wolfe that this will not disappear. Only a few particular points need to be proven for all this scenario of "fall into place".  There  will be quite a few more individuals besides Quentin Alice Louise Bryce, Patsy Mary Wolfe and HREOC town agent Clare Endicott, Jeffrey Ernest John Spender and Graham Ramsay, the then Federal Court Deputy Registrar for Brisbane who will panic, but they will be more peripheral,so may be able to do a "deal".  That is not necessary though.  The fools who committed the perverting the course of justice crimes plus many more have not increased the difficulty of proving the professional misconduct by Patsy Mary Wolfe anywhere near as much as they raised the value and benefit of proving these multiplying multiple crimes in company.

These following paragraphs show the extent of the FRAUD & CORRUPTION of the Queensland  Government targeted at just one person, ME.

Their false argument is based upon the false proposition that a regulation to a Statute can override a RIGHT in that Statute and/or a Common Law Right. includedTimeLineQldGovernmentCoverUp.php This timeline will show conclusively, the extent of the corruption in Queensland.   We detail here one major criminal plot with many subplots, perpetrated mainly by the Queensland Government and Queensland Government Authorities, Commissions and departments.   The Queensland Police were prominent  in committing an Armed Robbery, a major part of this criminal plot.  Senior Police including Superintendent Dale Pointon are ACCESSORIES  after the fact to the Armed Robbery and accessories to the OTHER crimes of Accessories after the fact to the many OTHER crimes since to "cover-up"/conceal the litany of CRIMINALITY. 

I know the law, as I have a Law Degree.   The criminals cannot make the Irrefutable conclusive evidence of crimes against me disappear, as much as they may continue to refuse to recognize the evidence, and refuse to consider it.   Hence, I will not give up until I have all these criminals penalized, my property returned to me, all wrongs against me corrected and many fold punitive damages awarded to me.

I have the advantage of not being stuffed around by corrupt lawyers, who have a paramount "duty" to the court.  I KNOW my rights and I DEMAND my rights.  

Corrupt Cop Henri Rantala,[in court, under Oath],Implicates Superintendent Dale Pointon in the CRIMINAL PLOT.

This now is a Statement by Corrupt Cop Henri Elias Rantala who was the lead cop committing the ARMED ROBBERY.  See the hyperlink where Rantala admitted to this in court under oath, confirming this.

"The offensive material has been
      subsequently been maintained on the internet since that time until
      the present day. I have been contacted by Superintendent Pointon,
      Officers from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence
      Branch, State Crime Operations Command, relatives all asking
      question about the material from 2006 until the present
      day."

[It has been transcribed for Google Ranking purposes.]
"The offensive material has been subsequently been maintained on the internet since that time until the present day.  I have been contacted by Superintendent Pointon, Officers from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, State Crime Operations Command, relatives all asking questions about the material from 2006 until the present day."

 Because in law, these statements are not EVIDENCE, and because we had the author, the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala in the witness box under oath [without our having to expend much effort to have him thus], we had him confirm that as "evidence under oath".
He did just thatCorrupt Cop Henri Rantala Implicates Superintendent Dale Pointon.  [We doubt if this has done much for the promotional prospects for this corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala.  From what we hear, it hasn't.]   This proves that Superintendent Pointon is corrupt.  Since his father, Laurie Pointon, was also a Senior Queensland cop, we wonder if the Pointon family is one of the CORRUPT POLICE FAMILIES indicated by respected Law academic Dr Christine Eastwood, wife of Southport Magistrate John Costanzo.  [See paragraph #5]

  
Rantala also Implicates Senior Officers From Ethical Standards Command, from Security Intelligence Branch, and from State Crime Operations Command 


http://haigreport.com/QldPoliceCorruption/QldPoliceCorruptionStatDecDrChristineEastwoodMagistrateJohnCostanzoRobertNeedhamHelenCouperCMC_PeterLindsayHansard25Nov2009.php#Statutory_Declaration

There is irrefutable conclusive evidence that the Brisbane City Council and the Queensland Government committed an armed robbery of me, as a step towards stealing my house and land that IS my home, from me.   Corrupt cop
Rantala Admits The Brisbane City Council Did Not Have a Court Order to enter my property.

The fact that the Queensland Police, various Queensland magistrates, Queensland Government Commissions, Queensland judges, and the Commonwealth of Australia Executive Government by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions [CDPP] engaged in episodes to cover-up and white wash the major armed robbery and fraud, shows conclusively that Queensland is utterly corrupt, and that this corruption extends to All of Australia by the actions of The Commonwealth of Australia Executive Government..

[We will continue to add to this timeline. Google et al will love that.  It will act as a summary of all the details of this criminal fraud and armed robbery of a disabled old man by the extensive corruption in the legal profession, police, courts and government commissions and Departments in Queensland, extending to the Commonwealth of Australia Executive government.]

Firstly, Some Pertinent Facts:

From 1991, I was studying at The University of Qld.   I moved into my property at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia in the precincts of The University of Queensland on 28th February, 1994.

Douglas Porter was the Registrar of The University of Queensland, and secretly, and so unbeknown to me, the Representative of The University of Queensland on St Johns College Council.  Importantly, Douglas Porter was also, for all relevant times [still is in 2012] the Chairman of St Johns College CouncilSt Johns College Council is a joint exercise between The University of Queensland and The Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC] aka the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane [CSDB].   St Johns College Council is the governing body of St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland.

I begin this Timeline/Chronology effectively with the Armed Robbery of me and much of my possessions, by the Queensland Government, with weapons supplied by the Queensland Police, on 29th November, 2004 and two further days immediately subsequent ie 30th November and 1st December, 2004, as the evidence is irrefutable, and conclusive, and is easily simple to understand.   This has not prevented many organs [for instance see Robert Walker, since made Commissioner of Body Corporates And Community Management] of the Queensland Government and of the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, engage in a CRIMINAL COVERUP & WHITEWASH, as I detail below. 

However, this was not the start of corruption and fraud against me by the Government of Queensland,  which can be traced back to 1974, and notorious corrupt labor & struck off lawyer Terence Joseph Mellifont - so the labor government made his wife, Julie Dick [but she is Julie Maree Mellifont on the electoral roll] a Judge of the District Court of Queensland] or earlier.  [Mellifont and Spender really cheated me when I was badly affected with brain damage].  Struck off ex-solicitor and clandestine SP bookie, with police protection, Terence Joseph Mellifont aka TJ Mellifont aka Terry Mellifont, who familiarized himself with the corrupt cops when a corrupt solicitor, ensured that I was marked as a target on the secret Queensland Police files.  There have been many incidents pointing to the fact that I was targeted by Queensland Police. 

13th September, 2004:

See the clandestine letter to the Brisbane City Council:

Hugh McVean the trustee aka Fiduciary and hence with a Fiduciary Duty, of the Constructive Trust of which my house was the corpus, and of which, I was the sole beneficiary with Beneficial Ownership, wrote in secret, a clandestine letter to the Brisbane City Council, asking them to keep it secret, and encouraging them to continue to pursue me. He indicated a CLANDESTINE CONSPIRACY  with Brisbane City Council against meHugh McVean advised the Brisbane City Council that I was disabled.  That meant that Hugh McVean knew that apart from the Constructive Trust, he also owed me a Fiduciary Duty because of my disability.  Hugh McVean was closely advised by a firm of corrupt Nambour lawyers; [but then most lawyers by far are corrupt].  On a previous occasion in a meeting chaired by the Residential Tenancy Authority, I advised all that it was not a Residential Tenancy and that Hugh McVean owed me a Fiduciary Duty.  He asked me how to spell "FIDUCIARY" as he wrote it down.  He would have asked his lawyers the meaning.  Anyway, in law a Fiduciary is deemed to know his Fiduciary Duty.  Not to so know is a "mistake of Law" and a "mistake of law" can never be an excuse for illegality.

19th October, 2004:

Even without the addition of weapons, clearly the Brisbane City Council were intent upon stealing my possessions from my yard so as to clear all my possessions from my yard for the speedy transfer of my property to The University of Queensland, St Johns College Council.  They knew they needed a court order but they did not want to argue the point or take the longer period of time to progress through the courts, because Douglas Porter, as Registrar of UQ and Chair of the St Johns College Council for UQ, wanted to use my house and land to accommodate Students in the 2005 Academic Year, as well as knowing that I had a PRIOR EQUITABLE RIGHT TO OWN MY PROPERTY.   They knew they could not simply break and enter.   They knew the law was clearThey needed a court order.  To corruptly circumvent the law, so as to have an "arguable case" if ever they were forced to it, the legal department of the Brisbane City Council, named the Brisbane City Legal Practice, decided to create an elaborate RUSE or ARTIFICE, but to do it with a degree of "secrecy" aka "Legal Professional Privilege".  The plan was hatched by David Askern, the Senior public sector parasite lawyer in Brisbane City Legal Practice.   This criminal fraud was perpetrated with the full knowledge and approval of David Askern. In fact, David Askern hatched the CRIMINAL PLAN to COMMIT ARMED ROBBERY.  We have more damaging evidence of illegality by David Askern.

They had corrupt barrister Wayne John Tolton, prepare an "opinion" which they could mis-interpret as permitting their unrestrained entry without a court order or my permission.  



25th November, 2004:

The Brisbane City Council wrote to me [received by me on Friday 26th November, 2004], advising that they intended entering my yard and removing my possessions without my permission. 
.

29th November, 2004:

The Brisbane City Council  [by Principal perpetrators BCC personnel Steve Beck, Owen Benvenuti and Paul Maxwell] with the ARMED ASSISTANCE of Queensland police personnel, Henri Elias Rantala, and  Monica Louise Antony [BigA for Antony] forced entry to my land where I had UNDISPUTED EXCLUSIVE LEGAL & EQUITABLE POSSESSION.

The facts of the situation being:
  1. the police were armed, although they did not draw their weapons [but if I had picked up a piece of wood to legally and properly protect my property, I have no doubt I would have been shot].,
  2. they purported to enter for the Brisbane City Council;
  3. they forced entry, AND BROKE AND ENTERED;
  4. the Brisbane City Council did not have authority, of any type, to enter;
  5. I had exclusive possession of my property;
  6. many possessions of mine were removed from my property;
MEANS;  ==>

that all persons involved in the common purpose, are guilty of ARMED ROBBERY, & breaking, entering and stealing.  Many more will be guilty of being accessories, accomplices and/or aiders and abettors. and thus subject to the same penalties. 

One purpose of the Armed Robbery was to give the Brisbane City Council "grounds" to write a report of "how badly I had kept the premises and yard" to provide to Hugh McVean the Trustee of the Constructive Trust so that Hugh McVean could make out to the Small Claims Tribunal [which handles Residential Tenancy Disputes] that I was a mere tenant and so have me evicted.  This "purpose" together with Hugh McVean's Secret letter of 13th September, 2004 make him an ACCESSORY TO THE ARMED ROBBERY.   For Hugh McVean, and my sister Coral Louise McVean, there is the aggravating factor, when Penalty is considered, that this crime was perpetrated while they had a Fiduciary Duty.  That usually means the Maximum penalty of imprisonment is doubled.

This was all done in this way by the McVeans and Brisbane City Council with the agreement of Douglas Porter, Chairman of, and Representative of The University of Queensland on St Johns College Council together with the other Party to St Johns College Council, the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC].   St Johns College council ran St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland.

Rantala subsequently arrested me on bogus charges so that he did not need to remain longer at the location, to ensure I did not ostensibly, "break the law" but in reality to give the armed robbers a free run. 

1st or 2nd March, 2005. 

I received the advice from Andrew Rouyanian, a Solicitor  alerting me to the reality that I was the beneficiary of a CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST and so was the Beneficial Owner of my home at 254 Hawken Drive.  One or two days later I advised my neighbour, solicitor and ex-fellow student with me in 2006 at The University of Qld, Stephen Tonge, that my home, house and land was owned by a Constructive Trust of which I was the beneficiary. Stephen Tonge had been feigning friendship towards me while knowingly working to steal my home, house and land owned by me, from me.
 
See "about Stephen Tonge".  Stephen Tonge was secretly working as lawyer and legal advisor for Douglas Porter, The University of Queensland, St Johns College Council, St Johns College, and the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane. As he was their lawyer in this matter, my advice to him was advice to all of his clients.  Trust is a matter of Equity Law.  Stephen Tonge was at that time a partner with Flower & Hart, who subsequently completed the "transfer" of the Legal Title.


7th February, 2005:

Hugh Douglas McVean, a trustee of the  Constructive Trust owning the Property at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, signed a transfer document, transferring the LEGAL TITLE OF MY PROPERTY OWNED BY ME AS BENEFICIARY OF THIS CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST, to the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane [CSDB] which is a joint venturer with The University of Queensland, in the St Johns College Council, of which Douglas Porter is Chair, and on which Douglas Porter is the Representative of The University of Queensland

May, 2005:

Hugh McVean my Trustee made out I was a mere tenant, took me to the Small Claims Tribunal to have me evicted and used as his main support, the report prepared by the Brisbane City Council when they committed the Armed Robbery, as part of his secret agreement with the Brisbane City Council to commit the Armed Bobbery

These McVean criminals had brought the disabled man before Magistrate William J (Bill) Randall in May, 2005 while trying to steal the same house.  Randall is the "referee" of the Queensland Small Claims Tribunal which deals with "Residential Tenancies".  The disabled man, on that occasion, was courteous and polite [he always is] to William J (Bill) Randall.  In contrast, William J (Bill) Randall was abusive to him, and the few words William J (Bill) Randall spoke to the disabled man were loud, ABRUPT and ABUSIVE; "be quiet, you will be told when to speak".   The disabled man had commenced an action  re this matter in another higher court, the Supreme Court of Queensland.  This meant that the SCT could do nothing.  Russell Mathews had documents of the other court to show to William J (Bill) Randall.  William J (Bill) Randall was "busy" pretending to be reading the Criminal McVean's complaint.  The disabled man tells us that he tried to save William J (Bill) Randall wasting his time and so wished to show William J (Bill) Randall, the document of the other court.
 
After William J (Bill) Randall's drama outburst, the disabled man waited 'til William J (Bill) Randall had made out that he had read the criminal's complaint.  Clearly, the outcome had long been decided.  Clearly, Hugh McVean had been playuing the victim to registry staff of the SCT of how he is so good and how his good nature is being abused, and this was passed on to Randall

The Criminal Hugh McVean is the psychopathic criminal [in fact Hugh McVean has PTSD] of the McVeans of Nambour Crime couple; not to be confused with the John Alexander Francis McVean Criminal of
12 Snowgum Drive, Bilambil Heights NSW 2486 with the 'phone number of +61 2 5590 8117. That John McVean is married to Marion Joan McVean. The McVean CRIME brothers seem to have a way of involving their wives in their Insurance Fraud Corruption - John McVean 'worked' his whole working life for South British Insurance.  Hugh's wife Coral Louise McVean was criminally compromised by Hugh McVean many decades ago, in Insurance Fraud.

Upon the disabled man giving the higher court document to William J (Bill) Randall, William J (Bill) Randall APOLOGISED  to Hugh McVean.  In a reasonably soft but distressed voice, William J (Bill) Randall APOLOGISED to McVean that "the matter is taken out of my hands".  "I am sorry I can do nothing.  He has commenced an action in the Supreme Court."  When he next spoke to the disabled man, he was again loud, abrupt and abusive.  Our disabled Informant tells us that it seemed to him as though William J (Bill) Randall was very familiar with McVean and his complaint, before that 2005 brief hearing commenced, and that William J (Bill) Randall had already made up is mind.   Hugh McVean's well practiced MO is to seek out decision makers, or the next in line to the decision maker [like "Registrar" of the Small Claims Tribunal [SCT]], and apologise for his "lack of knowledge or familiarity with the procedure and just explain  how he is at so much of a disadvantage because he is such a "good and Christian" person,  when in fact McVean is a "psychopathic control freak".  This is really due to Hugh McVean's PTSD.  Hugh McVean has long realized, since the tragic death of both of his parents when Hugh was aged 16 years, the value of playing the 'victim' fiction.

Hugh McVean has a well practiced patter of
playing the 'victim' fiction; along the lines that he is a poor unfortunate good souled person who has tried to do the best for his wife's "black sheep" brother, out of his compassion and charity, and this "black sheep" has taken advantage of this "poor generous and compassionate" Hugh McVean.  In fact Hugh McVean is a psychopath and pathological liar and cheat, [this is a common sympton of PTSD -  "Because the world has been so mean to me, I will place no limits upon what I will do to achieve good things for myself", is the view of many PTSD sufferers; it is a psychiatric disaoder.], who set out to cheat his wife's brother to show how big he is.  IN FACT, HUGH McVEAN NEEDS TO TRY TO BOOST HIS SELF RESPECT.   He and Coral had to adopt children BECAUSE HUGH McVEAN HAD SUCH A LOW SPERM COUNT.  This little lowlife parasite, Hugh McVean WAS FIRING BLANKS He is IMPOTENT; so he became a BULLY as well as an INSURANCE FRAUDSTER CRIMINAL.  You can view an indication of this persona he adopts in one of his written emails.
McVean's FIRING BLANKS, had a benefit for society, of reducing the quantity of Criminal McVean's genes in circulation.

It seems that William J (Bill) Randall considers that the SCT is his own kingdom and that William J (Bill) Randall can grant "favours" as and when he pleases, and to hell with the law and Due Process.  Afterall, Randall has Judicial Immunity.

An alternative explanation is that because the corruption in Qld courts arises due to the Chief Justice being corrupt, and his also being Chancellor of the Anglican Diocese of Brisbane, the Paul de Jersey corruption has also become ANGLICAN CORRUPTION.  The Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan, Warden of St Johns College at The University of Queensland, thinks this has given him a licence to gain by corruption.

Clearly, Willian Randall was deferring to the 'ANGLICAN CORRUPTION'.
 

1st June, 2005. 

The subsequently modified bogus charge came before Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich [subsequently termed Magistrate Topsy-Turvy by Qld Court of Appeal, and "Wally" by his corrupt police mates.]  I had called/subpoenaed  various witnesses, including from the Brisbane City Council to show that the entry to my yard, the pretext upon which Rantala arrested me, was illegal.   Magistrate Wally Topsy-Turvy [Walter Harvewyt Ehrich] was desperate and determined that no evidence would be heard, as if the evidence had been heard, it would have shown that the police [Queensland Government] and Brisbane City Council had committed an Armed Robbery. 

12th August, 2005. 

A civil action against a number of related parties for related transactions, including for trespass on 29th November, 2004, and conversion  by the Brisbane City Council, was mentioned before Justice Margaret White in the Supreme Court of Queensland. She refused to disqualify herself for bias or conflict of interest.  She related her close connection to the University of QueenslandMargaret White struck out my pleadings, gave me leave to replead, but Ordered that Brisbane City Council be removed as a defendant in this action.  Of course I could commence another action against the Brisbane City Council, but, importantly, this made the consideration of the evidence of the Armed Robbery more remote.  Margaret White has Judicial Immunity from Prosecution for her evil actions.  Each of the Counsel coram her, being   John W. PedenJohn Peden and Mr Fraser Dawson, are also protected by Advocates Immunity.  Both Peden and White are well known to each other as Sycophants to The University of Queensland.

Consideration of her conclusion that the Brisbane City Council should be removed as a defendant needs further scrutiny. She had struck out the pleading, and given leave to replead. Therefore, she had nothing before her on which to base any decision that the Brisbane City Council be removed as a defendant. Now, it is a GIVEN, on the irrefutable evidence that the Brisbane City Council did not have authority to enter and the surrounding events, that an armed robbery by the Qld police and Brisbane City Council occurred. This Armed robbery was for the benefit of her favoured University of Queensland, its registrar Douglas Porter, and the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane, of which the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Paul de Jersey is and was, at all relevant times, Chancellor. Since this has caused me to be robbed of a vast amount of my possessions, plus been a preliminary and integral step of having me robbed of my beneficial ownership of my home for the benefit of her favoured University of Queensland and its Registrar Douglas Porter, and that that fraud of me has had many repeated steps before and since to conceal that fraud, [and this is just one step in this timeline of fraud], it suggests that Justice Margaret White, acted as she did to assist the perpetration of these frauds. This at least, suggests she is biased against me and likely to make similar “biased” decision against me in the future. Importantly, on the 25th November, 2011, Margaret White refused to disqualify herself in the Queensland Court of Appeal, and subsequently found against me, in a case related to this Armed Robbery and major fraud.


8th November, 2005:

Another extremely dumb or corrupt Queensland Government Commissioner, is John Briton, Legal Services Commissioner.  He committed his corruption in writing.   His "view" is wrong as would be known by high school students in legal studies.  See:  the Correct Legal PrincipleA Regulation or a section of a regulation  cannot over-ride a right in a statute or a common law right.    That he, and  so many others would put their corruption in writing indicates his confidence, and the confidence of so many others, in the complete widespread corruption in Queensland and Australia.

See in his attached letter the paragraph:
You are also of the view that Mr Tolton's advice is incorrect as he has misinterpreted sections 200 and 209 of the Regulation and failed to examine appropriate case law in the area. I have examined the relevant sections of the Heallh Regulation 1996 and the cases referred to your complaint. I am of the view that Mr Tolton's advice was correct and that the BCC is not required to seek permission from a Court before entering the premises. Section 200 provides a statutory right to the BCC to enter a place after it has issued a notice pursuant to section 209 if that notice has not been complied with.

It is interesting to compare the way two differenct Corrupt Qld Commissioners express the same corruption.  Compare John Briton's with that written by Robert Walker now Commissioner, Body Corporate & Community Management but previously of the Qld Crime and Misconduct Commission and his letter dated 10th April, 2006. I suggest that Robert Walker's style is his admission that he knows it is false, bogus and corrupt.  When all this eventually 'hits the fan', and it will, each of the many corrupt individuals will want everyone to believe that their mistake of law was a genuine mistake.

9th February, 2006: 

In my Action against the Brisbane City Council, Justice Henry George Fryberg of the Supreme Court of Queensland  deemed me a Vexatious Litigant so summarily defeating my action against The Brisbane City Council and banning me from suing them again, so giving the protection of the Supreme court of Queensland to Armed Robbers and Fraudsters of a Disabled Old Man..  See his evil decision.  Justice Henry George Fryberg of the Supreme Court of Queensland has Judicial Immunity from Prosecution for his evil actions.  The Counsel coram him, on that occasion,  John W. Peden is also protected by Advocates Immunity.   John W. Peden is a evil corrupt obsequious barrister closely associated with Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland, where he grovels to gain undeserved privilege from Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland.    John W. Peden also acted as a conduit between The University of Queensland and the Brisbane City Council to permit the collaboration to commit the fraud.  They expect that they are protected regarding this conduit for their Conspiracy to Defraud by Client Privilege aka Legal Professional Privilege

10th April, 2006: 

In response to my complaint to the Crime and Misconduct Commission, this letter dated 10th April, 2006 was sent to me. His rational is false.  It is basic law of  Statute v Regulation   A Regulation or a section of a regulation  cannot over-ride a right in a statute or a common law right.    The Author of this, Robert Walker is clearly corrupt.  He has apparently been rewarded for his corruption by his elevation/promotion to Commissioner, Body Corporate & Community Management.   Clearly, the Body Corporate & Community Management Commission [BCCM] is part of the extensive corruption of bribery and payola in Queensland.

23rd May, 2006:

Queensland's "Assistant" Information Commissioner, Susan Barker, [ie Sue Barker; in Russian language 'subarka' - in latin script rather than Cyrillic - means DOG; - I wonder how appropriate?] the cloth eared evil incompetent public sector parasite stated in her letter dated 23rd May, 2006, an error apparent to a high schools student of legal studies, that a regulation [Section 200] [since revoked], composed by public sector parasites and rubber stamped in a Government Gazette,  could over-ride the rights in a Statute, approved by a majority in the democratically elected parliament;. Section 160 Health Act 1937.  [The "Entry" provisions were later amended to section 144 whereby the Council could apply for a warrant from a Magistrate, ex parte.] However, at the time of the Armed Robbery, to enter, without my permission, the Brisbane City Council, and anyone entering for them were required to obtain a Mandatory Court Order after giving me a Right to be Heard [Natural Justice] in the court.  See Sub Sec (ii)Section 160 Health Act 1937.
In fact, the office of the Information Commissioner [OIC] has been an oft repeated source of coverup of the Crime of Armed Robbery by the Queensland government and the Brisbane City Council and the crime of "Land Fraud" by Douglas Porter In time we will detail here, at least THREE independent instances by the Information Commissioner of Queensland.


23rd August, 2006:

I began publishing the HaigReport.com website online as a PUBLIC MEDIA.  As such, that publication has Qualified Privilege.  Qualified Privilege is particularly robust when the publication is
  1. exposing crime;
  2. exposing lying, even mere hypocrisy, let alone FRAUD & CRIME, by Public officials or even just ANYONE in, or connected to, Public life.
  3. In combination; that is, for CRIME by PUBLIC OFFICIALS, [our Raison d'être for HaigReport.com], this Qualified Privilege is impenetrable


Qualified Privilege is a protection against all law suits, not just the usual of defamation.   It does not matter if the publication is not totally true or true at all, but only that the publisher took reasonable steps to check the accuracy.   In Australia, there is a further protection for publication in the public Media, if the subject matter is discussion related to Political Elections.  There is a Freedom of Speech related to discussion of political matters.  The general tenor of what constitutes Qualified Privilege can be gained by considered decision by the higher courts in common law jurisdictions around the world. There is for instance the TEN point test as devised by the House of Lords in the UK in the in the Reynolds Case. In a subsequent case, the House of Lords clarified that the TEN Criteria were not "hurdles" but mere POINTERS to be considered.   A subsequent case confirmed that the protection was greater not only if the matter was a discussion of political matters, but of general public interest, [which does not include mere curiosity]. 

Further Freedom of Speech protection can be gained by publishing websites on servers either in the US or where the Internet transmission is likely to pass through the United States where they have the Freedom of Speech Amendment to their Constitution.  For most purposes in law [the notable exception being defamation], the place of publication is the location of the Server on which the Website files are stored and where each page is distinctly composed by the server from the stored files and other data, each time it is accessed.

From August, 2006:

Soon after commencing my website HaigReport, I noticed the most frequent visitor each month and a usual visitor each day was Douglas Porter.  Douglas Porter was Registrar of The University of Queensland, and, unknown to me at the time, Representative of The University of Qld on, and Chairman of, the St Johns College Council that ran St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus Of The University of Qld.   I knew this regular and most frequent visitor was Douglas Porter, as he had a Fixed or Static IP, and I soon realized it was his.  We could see the Search Terms he used in Google.  In fact, Douglas Porter had the same IP for his use of the Internet from his home.  There have been  occasions when Douglas Porter was accessing my sites at 2am and 4am [on different days].   I did not realize the reason for Douglas Porter's obsession, but now realize that he was orchestrating the theft of my beneficial interest in my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, and for that purpose was orchestrating the purchase of the Legal title to my home, controlled by the trustee of the Constructive Trust..

The Two parties represented on the St Johns College Council are The University of Queensland and the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane [CSDB] aka Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC].  Soon after the appointment of Paul de Jersey as Chief Justice of Queensland, the BDAC found it "beneficial" to appoint him as "Chancellor of the BDAC.  Douglas Porter, as Chairman of St Johns college Council, secretly orchestrated the CSDB having transferred to it, the legal title of my home, of which I owned the beneficial Title, and having me dispossessed of my possession of my home so they could claim that they bought my house property without knowledge of my prior beneficial interest. In Law, this is not now nor then possible as they had already been advised of my prior beneficial Interest because I had advised their legal representative Stephen Tonge.  All this time, Porter was orchestrating repeated acts of discrimination, cheating and criminal conduct towards me by personnel at The University of Qld.  Porter should have disqualified himself from dealing with me during this time, but failed to do so. 

October 2006:

police blocked my reporting crime by blocking my emails for bogus reasons:

I communicate almost exclusively by email as I am disabled and my computer is my main disability Aid.   Because I have Brain Damage I prefer to communicate in writing.  Because I had been the target of an Armed Robbery, the "appropriate" people to whom to report this crime is the police. Because the police had committed the Armed Robbery, this was one way of discovering if the crime was by a single cop or if the whole police service was guilty. As can be seen at the second paragraph on page 2 of a letter from the Queensland police, the police blocked my emails for bogus reasons, just so they did not have to bother.  They really are corrupt. 

Anyway, if does not matter at all, as it is far better that, if I have anything to say, I say it in a PUBLIC MEDIUM such as the HaigReport.com where I and my authors have Qualified Privilege. What it does show is the culpability of the Queensland police Sevice.   Why would any decent person join the Queensland police? That truly is a rhetorical question.

Qualified Privilege is particularly robust in relation to exposure of Crime and Exposure of lying and hypocrisy in public life.   Publishing evidence of ARMED ROBBERY by PUBLIC OFFICIALS, should be well and truly protected.   I have quite a bit of detail about Qualified Privilege online at these previously mentioned links, and I think it is worth a  read if you have the time.      I think public publication with Qualified Privilege  is in preference to courts and governments. It changes the game. I will not bother with courts as plaintiff in civil actions, as corrupt judges and magistrates will try to just frustrate, by striking out applications, and other corrupt actions.   I will just wait 'til the corrupt parasites try to sue me in Crime.  They will not then try to have the action discontinued.  Of course, corrupt judges will try to exclude QP, but I can appeal that to the highest courts.  Usually there are no filing fees for criminal appeals [except to the Australian High Court - but that is the last stop before the case goes to a UN Court in Geneva, Switzerland]. In a criminal trial, I will have an opportunity to cross examine the perjuring police [such as my Cross Examination Of Corrupt Police Parasite Henri Elias Rantala and government officials.  As I am trained in law it is quite inexpensive for me. I would expect to obtain a better result than if I employed a "lawyer" in practice.  Those lawyers have a paramount Duty to the Court, [and corrupt judges] and have Advocates Immunity.  In general the legal profession in Queensland is CORRUPT.  Of course, each and every occasion on which I am charged by police, I have wonderful material to publish on HaigReport.com /.  See also where Brisbane Magistrate Paul M Kluck [aka Klutz] ridiculed me for being disabled, and ridiculed my disability of Brain damage.


23rd January, 2007:

I received this letter dated 23rd January, 2007 from Judy Spence the Qld Police Minister at the time.  My reaction was to write this page and send this audio message.

30th September, 2007:

At about 1am, a student intellectual lightweight named Regan Ireland began a Facebook Hate & 'Incitement to Murder' Site called, "FUCK OFF DUCKMAN".   I kept a number of ducks.  The 30th September was a Sunday in 2007. 

Douglas Porter was right onto that site, first thing Monday Morning.  I do not know if he was viewing it on Sunday.   I discovered it because Douglas Porter, in his traditional lazy  style clicked on the live hyperlink to my website haigreport.com that Simon Kalinowski has placed on the facebook Hate Site at 3:03AM on the 1st September, 2007.   Porter clearly was too dumb to realize that whenever he came to my site in that way, I was seeing the referrer site, so could tell he had been viewing the Fuck OFF DUCKMAN Site.  Douglas Porter did that every day for the month that that site was online.  As you can see I recorded most of the data from the Hate site. In particular I recorded the names of all the people who agreed with the language and sentiment of the site "SOME ONE KILL HIM PLZ"

Clearly, Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland were aware of the scandalous website called "FUCK OFF DUCKMAN'".  Yet, Douglas Porter ACTIVELY CONDONED IT.
 
The names of the 125 people are at on our site now.    We calculate that they have collectively cost themselves about $25million.

22nd May 2008:

'First" Assistant Commissioner, Rangihaeata in her diatribe dated 22nd May, 2008, found FOR BOGUS NONSENSICAL REASONS, that the Armed Robbers, the Brisbane City Council, could refuse to provide me with information pursuant to the Freedom of Information Legislation.

During August, 2008:

A corrupt parasite Superintendant Brain Hay of the Queensland police, tried to bully the webhost for HaigReport.com, in New South Wales [where Qld police have no jurisdiction] to close down all of our websites, WITHOUT GIVING ANY REASON except secrecy provision of terrorism legislation.  As a result, to save the webhost any more problems with these corrupt parasite pigs, the websites' host servers were moved overseas, although the Australian Webhost in New South Wales did not require it.  

1st December, 2008:

Because egregious Parasite Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich had made a deceitful corrupt decision, I set about to destabilize him with publications on my website.   He made a corrupt decision on the 1st June, 2005, and importantly, when I calmly advised him appropriately, he bellowed at me " Well just SIT DOOOOWN! would you" [line 44] BIG BIG MISTAKE YOU PARASITE EHRICH.   

Here, in his own handwriting, he starts to do back flips.   I am pleased to say, my websites confronted him.


17th December, 2008:

Magistrate Topsy Turvy aka Ehrich together with compliant police prosecutor, held a farcical "hearing" so Ehrich could attempt to put the matter right.  Read the transcript.   Read the dickhead stumbling police prosecutor  Sgt COX, "og ah ow ah".  See what the Court of Appeal had to say about this.


7th February, 2009:

Queensland police attempted to close down my websites overseas for no justifiable reason [except their dislike because it exposed Queenasland police corruption - "What a tangled Web" as they commit more crime to conceal earlier crime  - See their email; Scroll to the TAN PANEL on this page], without grounds and without giving me  Natural Justice which is my Right to be Heard.

28th August, 2009:

Corrupt Queensland police, because they could not close down my websites, came and seized my Disabilities Aids of computer [for my brain damage disability and hand writing disability] and Camera [for transcription due to my handwriting disability], and charged me "using a carriage service, ie broadband, to upload content to websites such that the Armed Robber, the corrupt Henri Elias Rantala, was offended or felt harassed".  It mattered not to those corrupt police that Rantala was a criminal many times over, and All websites are public media and thus have Qualified Privilege which extends to all journalists who write on these publicly viewable websites, or other employees or contractors who assist with these publications. 

14th September, 2009 to 24th September, 2010:

See the Menu of the 18 separate TRANSCRIPTS [which are all online]  of the Magistrate Court Appearances resulting from this arrest.  The four charges have not progressed to a completed Committal hearing,  yet, to the 9th April, 2012 but is at present [9th April, 2012], in the High Court of Australia.

23rd February, 2010:

My response to the arrest, charges and theft of my Disability Aids by Queensland police, was to launch an appeal, ALMOST SIX YEAR OUT OF TIME, to the conviction of me, [as confirmed in the letter from Police minister Judy Spence dated 23rd January, 2007] by magistrate "Wally" Walter Harvey Ehrich, [later called "topsy-Turvy" by the Qld Court of Appeal].

19th March, 2010:

Ex Qld DPP, and now DCJ Leanne Clare heard the appeal, and foolishly in a dumb act decided, when that decision had the effect of concealing, the egregious, evil act of magistrate "Wally" [to his corrupt police mates] Walter Harvery Ehrich, to coverup and whitewash the Armed Robbery, that the decisions of  Magistrate "topsy-Turvy"   on 1st December, 2008 and  17th December, 2008 meant I had no reason to appeal.

23rd March, 2010: 

Within days of the patently wrong decision of ex DPP now District Court Judge Leanne Clare, [as a courtesy between judicial officers, they do not mention, by name, the judges and magistrates who made the errors], I had Appealed and sought Leave to Appeal to the Queensland Court of Appeal.   I won that appeal resoundingly.

24th June, 2010:

See also the ridicule of me and my Brain Damage Disability by the foolish, dumb magistrate Paul M Kluck:  ""BENCH [Paul M Kluck]: So, have you got your thoughts back together again, Mr Mathews?" 

Although I am not unintelligent and have a Law Degree, Commerce Degree and mathematics majors in my Science Degree and Arts Degree, I do have brain damage, that produces Speciial Needs for me to exist, arising from my becoming quickly  mentally fatigued and soon mentally exhausted.  Despite my repeated advices and demands, Magistrate Paul M Kluck [the Klutz], refused to Accommodate my Special Needs.    Kluck the Klutz's ridicule of me and my brain damage disability is an indication of his unlawful discrimination and denial of my having a Fair Hearing.  Kluck the Klutz recognized that he had a Duty to ensure I had a fair hearingMagistrate Kluck admits he was required to ensure I was granted a Fair hearing.   In fact, Magistrate Paul M Kluck, admitted he denied me a fair hearing.  He had clearly thought that I could just be forced to continue and, in that way, denied a fair hearing.  Because of Kluck's Denail of a Fair Hearing which was thus a Denial of Due process, the hearing coram magistrate Paul M. Kluck was thus untra vires and a nullity.   I engaged in the committal hearing for three days of the six days allocated. After those three days, I refused to appear for three months while Kluck continued to threaten me.  Finallly, on the 24th September, 2010, Kluck referred this hearing to the District Court to determine if I was "fit to stand trial".    I ceased attending about three week BEFORE my resounding victory, and most of the "deliberations" by Kluck Klutz occurred AFTER that decision of my RESOUNDING VICTORY.

After Kluck had terminated his involvement in my case, for the time being, I lodged a Section 222 of the Justices Act of 1886 (Qld) Appeal to the District Court.  That meant that the single thread of court cases, had become two, and my appeal thread took precedence in time.


 

20th July, 2010:

I had a resounding victory in the Queenland Court of Appeal of the Decision [in fact decisionSS], of Magistrate Wally, Topsy Turvy, Walter Harvey Ehrich of 1st June, 2005, 1st December, 2008 and 17th December, 2008.    I suspect those responsible for the extensive corruption in Queensland, as I have experienced it, might have been feeling a little uneasy especially given the dicta by Her Honour McMurdo P. /.



25th October, 2010:


After Kluck had terminated his involvement in my case, for the time being, I lodged a Section 222 of the Justices Act of 1886 (Qld) Appeal to the District Court.  That meant that the single thread of court cases, had become two, and my appeal thread took precedence in time.

I lodged my Section 222 of the Justices Act of 1886 (Qld)Appeal to the Decisions of Kluck, to the District CourtThe Judge, second in line to the corrupt Chief District Court Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe, one KJOB [DCJA (Administrator) Kerry John O'Brien] took control of my two cases [the two threads], in the District Court and expressed his determination to maintain control of them himself.

25th October, 2010:

See the site discussing how DCJA [District Court Judge Administrator] Kerry John O'Brien [KJOB] wanted to stamp his mark on my Cases.

25th October, 2010:

See the Menu of matters surrounding the TWO MATTERS to be heard in the District Court.

4th November, 2010:

See the Menu of matters of Public Sector parasites in the District Court Registry trying to stuff me around.

25th November, 2011:

My appeal of the decision of the DCJA Kerry John O'Brien [just KJOB in my work] was heard in the Qld Court of Appeal.   Importantly, all three judges including the evil Margaret White, refused to disqualify themselves.

13th December, 2011:

Justice Margaret White, was lead judge on the Court of Appeal Panel, which delivered their decision refusing to invoke their Original Jurisdiction to consider the irrefutable evidence properly before them in this matter, where that irrefutable evidence showed that the Brisbane City Council and the Government of Queensland that had appointed her, [Justice Margaret White], and The University of Queensland were guilty of Armed Robbery and Criminal Fraud of a Disabled Old Man.


Of course, as I have explained previously, the point of our uploading these pages before all the content has been added to the individual pages, but still promoting these pages in the top panel of each of the hundreds of thousands of page imprints each months produced by our websites., is so that Google et al will see that the pages are being constantly upgraded and so Google et al  will rate our pages more highly

3rd January, 2012:

On this day, 3rd January, 2012, I sought "special" leave of the High Court of Australia to appeal the above decision of the Queensland Court ot Appeal, when the bench was lead by the evil Justice Margaret White.   Today [21st April, 2012,] no decision has been forthcoming from the HCA.   Should my aplication fail there, I have then exhausted all domestic remedies.  Exhausting all domestic remedies is a condition to my then taking this as a "communication" [a further "appeal"] to the UN's Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Geneva, Switzerland.  I  clearly have standing to so "appeal" as I am disabled.    I can easily and irrefutably prove that I am disabled and that the Armed Robbery occurred and the involvement of the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia in that so invoking the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities .  I can then show that my disability has been related to the Armed Robbery and to my subsequent arrest and trial.  That that "original crime" of Armed Robbery has been or attempted to have been concealed or covered-up by Qld police, Magistrates,  JudgeS, Qld Government Commissions and Commissioners, and COMMONWEALTH PROSECUTORS, with bogus, and clearly false "justifications" will highlight just how extensive the corruption is in Qld & AUSTRALIA.  This REALIZATION of the REALITY of CRIME in AUSTRALIA, will just cascade throught these subsequent events.   With each event of "coverup" in turn, the extent or size of the Qld corruption has been shown to be thAt much more ingrained & EXTENSIVE.  This monumental corruption then has an effect cascading back through corrupt events preceding the Armed Robbery on 25th November, 2004.

I am astounded at the level of corruption in Queensland and Australia, that these events confirm.  This level of corruption in the CRIMINAL ELITE, has been permitted to permeate our society due principally to the apathy of people in general and Australians in particular.

[back to the "beginning" of this "Timeline"; really, where we entered the continuous timeline that had no "beginning" ie where we "start" this corruption plot report]

See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
PHPincludes/includedWrittenByRussellMathews.php
Web-site, Written, Coded, Produced and Directed by
Russell G H Mathews
BCom BSc LLB BA

International Disability Rights Advocate
invoking
UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
& UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Image
CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE

View list of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards
Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html



 Menu: Corrupt Qld Judiciary: Favours Untouchable Banks FRAUD; What is Chief Justice of Supreme Court of Qld, Paul deJersey doing?

/PHPincludesCorruptQldJudiciary/includedMenuCorruptQldJudiciary.php

Menu: Corrupt Qld Judiciary: Chief Justice Paul de Jersey

Publications by John Alfred SALMON: retired Bank Manager, [for NAB].

  1. THE UNTOUCHABLE BANKS: An exposé of banking process and legal deception; by John A Salmon
  2. Problems Experienced by Bank Litigants in the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Queensland



 HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:


See: the Menu: for HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD:

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld: The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ:

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
PHPincludesProofSappideenWalkerLister/includedOverviewMultipleUniversityQueenslandDouglasPorterFrauds.php

Overview, Synopsis, or Summary of Public Sector Parasites Bullying specifically The University of Queensland & its previous registrar [for 22 years], Douglas Porter:

When one has a great amount of factual material to relate, one has to organize it so the reader can enter the narrative.  With the internet and Google and other search engines, that is unlikely to be at the "beginning", [if there is such a thing as a "beginning"].  Basically, what I have to do is to have various levels of narrative.  One level needs to have all the facts connected in detail.  No group of facts is a closed group, but rather, facts or aspects of one group of facts, relate to, or are identical to, facts or aspects of other groups.  As well, the reader/visitor does not want to read everything ever written.  Hence I need to have various levels of summary.  One level of summary will summarize the detailed facts.  Above that, is another level of summary that will summarize a number of summaries, according to common factors or relationships, in the level below.  Sometimes, when writing the detailed facts level, another aspect, or one or more of those facts, may require a detailed analysis.   Of course, the factual situation can be viewed from a number of perspectives.  Thankfully, Google et al, will index all of those.

Menus will tend to serve that role of a summary, but merely one summary or overview..  This text could be viewed as a Menu in a narrative.  This section will link to the various parts of our websites that are referenced from here.

There are basically FOUR episodes where the University of Queensland has cheated, defrauded and discriminated against me because I am disabled.  There exists a great amount of overlap between the episodes.  Of course, the outcome of each was that I was cheated and defrauded badly.   These facts I relate reflect badly upon The University of Queensland administration and Douglas Porter in particular.

Chronologically, from 1992 four main episodes are, the Law School, in 1993, 1994 and 1995 at least, the maths department and the EPSA faculty in particular Andrew Lister in 1997 to 2001, at least, then in 2003 - 2006 the dumb femi-nazi "Queen" Janine Schmidt was "chief" librarian at UQ attacked, defrauded and discriminated against me because I was disabled.   The Criminal culminating fraud by Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland was Porter's secretly orchestrating the defrauding me of my home, for the benefit of the University of Queensland and the UQ college called St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of UQ, when Porter was secretly  the Chair of the Council that ran St Johns College.

I am a mathematician.  My greatest skills are in maths.  I guess that could be because I have always had a writing disability, undiagnosed until circa 1993.  In school, all my written work was poorly written.  Hence, as teachers who mark work, see it as a chore and tedious job to be finished as quickly as possible, judge a work by how it looks or feels to them, and gives a subjective mark.  With maths, the teachers would see the correct answer, the correct diagrams so I would receive full marks, regularly.

I returned to The University of Queensland [UQ] in 1991 doing maths.  I did well. At that time, I had hassles with public sector parasites, lying parasites and police so decided to study law at UQ.  That began the episode of repeated occasions of my being attacked, cheated and defrauded by the law school by particular individuals within the law school and within the administration of The University of Queensland.   The University of Queensland was vicariously liable for that.  The next major episode occurred with the Maths department part of the Engineering, Physical science & Architecture "Super" faculty under the Executive Dean Andrew Lister.

Fraud by Douglas Porter, The University of Queensland, [part of the Australian Government], by defrauding a disabled reclusive old man of his HOUSE & LAND; including Douglas Porter's being linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity

These pages will be developed to expose the defrauding of a disabled, and hence reclusive old man of his house and land at 254 Hawken Drive St Lucia [view MAP] by Douglas Porter, the previous Registrar of The University of Queensland, for use by The University of Queensland.  Douglas Porter had been attacking, bullying and discriminating against this disabled reclusive old man since the early 1990s when he was a mature age student at The University of Queensland.

Porter was closely associated with two others linked to the Attempted MURDER of the disabled old man, being the then recent law lecturers Quentin Bryce, and Patsy Mary Wolfe.  The disabled old man was, at that time, a student of law at the University of Queensland, where Porter was Registrar.  Porter was engaged in bullying 
the disabled old man prior to the Attempted Murder of the disabled old man, and subsequenly, but then with greater  gusto.   Douglas Porter, then, as clandstine Chair of the St Johns College Council, that ran the St Johns College on the St Lucia, Brisbane Campus of The University of Queensland, began to secretly orchestrate the theft of the home of the disabled old man; the house and land owned in trust by the disabled old man, to take advantage of the fact that the disabled old man was under a strident attack..  

LinkToAspinallInPorterPanel.php This Profile Panel re the parasitic Douglas Porter, rewarded by the anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall and the anglican church, because Porter used confidential information obtained as Registrar of The University of Queensland, to assist Phillip Aspinall steal the home of a vulnerable disabled guy links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud of this vulnerable disabled guy by anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall.

  Douglas PORTER is linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity.
See fat pig parasite Porter playing with himself

  masturbating

in his office. So, what can you expect from The University of Queensland?
Write and tell us what you think about this University.
  Douglas Porter taken at 9:55AM 12th July, 2006 in his office at The University of Queensland where he was at that time, Registrar of The University of Queensland, and also clandestinely, the Representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly Chairman of, the St Johns College Council which runs St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland.  For years prior and years since then, Porter was secretly scheming to steal my home, beneficially owned by me, from me, by threatening and manipulating the emotionally challenged emotional shell of the trustee.

Concurrently, while I was then a student at the Universiity of Queensland, Douglas Porter, as Registrar, repeatedly discriminated against me in relation to my use of the libraries and my being accompanied by my two wee assistance dogs while on the campus of UQ.

Just days before the armed robbery on me on 29th November, 2004, by corrupt cop [and Armed Robber] at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, as a preliminary and integral step towards stealing my property [my home, my beneficially owned house and land], from me, all orchestrated by Douglas Porter, Douglas Porter had that same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala charge me with bogus criminal charges. No doubt this was intended to complicate my life even more than my life was being complicated, on top of my disabilities, by all the Douglas Porter inspired disability discrimination of me in UQ libraries, so making the theft of my home even easier for The University of Queensland.


We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this intellectual lightweight and corrupt gutless parasite .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 .   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 . 

Douglas Porter was The University of Queensland's SECRETIVE/CLANDESTINE representative, [and Chair], on the Governing body of one college, St Johns College at the University of Queensland - [see 7th paragraph of this linked UQ publication] or our copy.   [Of course, The University of Queensland has complete control of that land on which the college is built, with its complicated legal arrangement.]  The Governing body is called the the St Johns College Council [SJCC] and Douglas Porter is the Chair of the SJCC. Important in the workings of St Johns College and the St Johns College Council, is the SJCC Budget.  The Warden of St Johns College is the fraudster the Rev John Morgan.  He is answerable to the SJCC for the running of SJC.  In particular, he is petrified of his spending being in excess of the SJCC budget.  He even attempts to defraud to avoid spending money that is not in the SJCC budget.  Earlier that year, Morgan admitted lying to me the previous year, so that he would not have to face up to the St Johns College Council [SJCC], for having spent money that he was legally required to spend, that was, however, not in the SJCC budget.  

Hence, SJCC is a part of the Australian Government Sector, as is The University of Queensland.  Also involved in this fraud were other divisions of the Australian Public Sector, namely the Brisbane City Council, Queensland Police [including the most senior level, on the evidence of the Queensland Police], Queensland Courts especially Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and Supreme Court Judge Henry George Fryberg. Others were involved for the money they would make from it and to be "on the in" with corrupt public sector parasites.  These include lawyer Stephen Tonge, [view home of Tonge on MAP]  then a partner of Firm of lawyers Flower & Hart but more recently of Tress Cox.  Some Capital Funding was provided by the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church aka the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Paul de Jersey, is the Chancellor of the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC].  They provided the funding for an expected return [albeit fraudulent] of approximately 20% year on year plus a locked in Capital Gain well in excess of CPI indexation.

Because the Australian Government has been involved in defrauding this disabled reclusive old man, this matter, and his being defrauded of his Commonwealth Disability Support Pension by Centrelink, will end up coram/before UN committees in Geneva pursuant to Australia's acceding to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.   The Corrupt Australian Government and all parts of it involved in this widespread fraud should be greatly shamed and we will expose them.

The Queensland Court of Appeal, the highest court in Queensland, has recently spoken on this matter.  [It was written up in the Brisbane newspaper as "Talk of the Legal World".], However, there is far more to come.

includedSummaryCaseFraudPoliceAndCDPP.php

Summary of the case by the Criminal, corrupt & FRAUDULENT Qld police AGAINST Disabled Old Man

This is the case where corrupt police and a corrupt Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, attempt to use brute force, of police arrest and harassment to silence the disabled old man, to conceal how the Queensland police performed an Armed Robbery on him to Assist the Queensland Government defraud the disabled old man of his house and land that he owned and which was his home.

The disabled old man has brain damage caused by severe head injury when a teenager.  That affects his ability to "work" for any but short time periods.  He is able to concentrate for only short periods. This is near impossible for a casual observer to notice.  He quickly becomes fatigued and if he is forced to continue to try to concentrate, that results in mental exhaustion.  On the first day of hearing, knowing the disabled old man's disability and the nature of it, Magistrate Klutz ridiculed the disabled old man, even though the disabled old man was trying hard to accommodate what the Magistrate desired.   CLEARLY, THE DISABLED OLD MAN MUST REFUSE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS, UNLESS AND UNTIL HIS SPECIAL NEEDS CONSEQUENT UPON HIS DISABILITIES ARE FULLY ACCOMMODATED.   THIS IS ESSENTIAL IF HE IS TO RECEIVE DUE PROCESS.  THE ONUS IS UPON THE MAGISTRATE, JUDGE AND DECISION MAKER, TO ENSURE THAT THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS EXTENDED DUE PROCESS aka NATURAL JUSTICE.

THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS HAPPY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS PROVIDED HE RECEIVES DUE PROCESS. 

The real crux of this fraud upon the disabled old man and concurrently, UPON THE JUSTICE AND LEGAL SYSTEM OF QUEENSLAND AND AUSTRALIA, is that this disabled old man is being prosecuted in the most contemptuous way, to continue the EXPLOITATION OF HIS BEING DISABLED BY THE QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT, in that the Queensland Government, defrauded/stole from the disabled old man, the house and land that he owned that was his home, for the use of and by The University of Queensland.  The clandestine fraud was orchestrated by the Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  The fraud involved an ARMED ROBBERY of the disabled old man by Queensland Police in company with a Queensland government Authority, for the benefit of another Queensland Government authority viz, The University of Queensland. The case involved a fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man. The same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala also charged the disabled old man with other charges to favour The University of Queensland, who had been defrauding the disabled old man for years.  ..

Instead of the Australian government doing as it should to honour its International Commitments [
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]] to rail against exploitation of disabled persons, it is actually perpetuating, ITSELF, the exploitation of this disabled old man, because no doubt, the exploitation of the disabled old man was by the Queensland Government, and a number of parts of the Queensland Government in collusion.

This fraud of the disabled old man was orchestrated by Queensland Public Sector Parasite, Douglas Porter, when he was Registrar of The University of Queensland, for the benefit of The University of Queensland and to punish the disabled old man for standing up for his rights as a Disabled person, while at The University of Queensland.  Involved in the Porter perpetrated fraud was an ARMED ROBBERY by the Queensland Government being the Queensland police in particular corrupt cops Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony, of the disabled old man at his home together with a concurrent fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man by the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala.

The law confirms that the Armed Robbery by Henri EliasRantala and Monica Louise Antony, was actually a CRIMINAL
armed robbery. The factual evidence is also online.  The conduct constituting the armed robbery was not just accidental.   The perpetrators of the fraud, Queensland Public Sector parasites, set out to create what they expected would be an arguable case TO JUSTIFY THE "ARMED ROBBERY" as just part of their normal operations.    They created a RUSE for just that reasonHowever, the silly bitch lawyer Joanne Whiting, did not know what she was doing, so clearly the Ruse was hatched by one of her superiors.

That fact then begs the question of the purpose of that
RUSE and armed robbery, and exposes the perpetrators of the defrauding of the disabled old man of his home.  Because the Queensland Government perpetrated the fraud of the disabled old man of his home, his house and land, the Queensland government wants it concealed.  Therefore, the conduct of prosecuting the disabled old man is criminal and makes the perpetrated an accessory to the fraud.  The evidence giving those prosecuting the disabled old man a "guilty mind" is all that evidence on that webpage.  Those involved now in "prosecuting" the disabled old man  are criminal. 

While the corrupt parasite Shane Hunter, a prosecutor from the Commonwealth DPP, had the knowledge that the corrupt police Rantala and Antony did commit an armed robbery, he cannot be prosecuted as he has "advocates' immunity".  However, none of the others involved in the process of prosecuting the Disabled Old Man have immunity.  Corrupt ex-cop [now 'working' for KPMG] Brendan Scott Read had put another "prosecutor" from the CDPP right into the frame, by admitting they colluded to bring the false charges against the disabled old man, but that prosecutor was not an advocate in this matter, so does not have
advocates' immunity.  That other parasite from the CDPP is named Anthony Gett.  Corrupt ex-cop Brendan Scott Read also does not have immunity from prosecution for being an accessory to the Armed Robbery and to the defrauding the disabled old man of his house and land, worth in the order of $1million.  Of course, we will be assisting the disabled old man to gain many more similar house and land properties in the area from the Fraudsters.  This will include the house of the defrauding lawyer who did the transfer of the title with full knowledge of the fraud.  His name is Stephen Tonge.  The Queensland Government, both the Queensland Public Sector university, The University of Queensland, and the Queensland Government of Anna Bligh proper,  will be up for the majority of the damages.  This all arose because the disabled old man IS disabled.  It was thought by the public sector parasites, with UQ Registrar Douglas Porter, as the lead criminal in the box seat driving the fraud of the disabled old man, that the disabled old man was ripe for exploitation, because he is permanently disabled.  Now, the Commonwealth of Australia, in the person of the corrupt Commonwealth DPP prosecutor Shane R. Hunter, has joined the fray exploiting the disabled old man.  This in in stark contravention of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The parasitic Federal labor government acceded to the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities  on 21st August, 2009.

Because all the police involved in the prosecution of the disabled old man, are presumed to know the detail of the evidence proving the armed robbery because the evidence and legal reason is in the Public Domain, online and it would be reasonable to presume that police would check its validity, and we know the evidence is 100% genuine, then all the police including the police solicitor Paxton Booth are put in the frame by the evidence of Brendan Scott Read.  The other police aware of the criminal conduct in which they were engaged included  Detective Sergeant Steven Bignall, Detective Senior Constables Gavin Hackett and Detective Senior Constable Dave Graham.  Each of these has been engaged in a criminal activity.  This amounts to 

Because parasitic fraudster Shane Hunter of the CDPP was prepared to prosecute these charges, when he knew the evidence proved that police Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony committed an Armed Robbery, suggests that he expected a win, meaning that he knew the Magistrates Court, and possibly the District Court are corrupt, like as displayed, maybe by Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and District Court Judge Leanne Clare.  that .d ..


This case now has a high profile International dimension.  Australia has ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD].  Importantly, the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia has, on 21st August, 2009 acceded to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [OP].  As shyster Shane Hunter is a Commonwealth Public Servant within the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, a Commonwealth Agency, a part of the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, he and it are subject to the OP.  As the disabled old man has already suffered extensive discrimination, and fraud, at the hands of Shyster Shane Hunter, breach of the CRPD has already occurred and hence, pursuant to the OP, formal complaint can be made to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Geneva, Switzerland, once all domestic Australian remedies have been exhausted, or effectively exhausted.

The summary for each day will be a Menu of the anchors [or markers/tags] placed in the Transcript of this day.  It will be effectively a Summary of the discussion between the Magistrate Paul M Kluck [the Klutz] and Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, [who knows the evidence that  proves the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala did in fact commit an armed robbery because no-one had authority to enter exclusively possessed land, on that occasion; they needed a court order but did not have one].  The disabled old man did not appear in the committal hearing coram Kluck, after 28th June, as he had become ill from the constant barrage of harassment and jibes aimed at his disabilities, and attacks upon his weaknesses caused by his disabilities, from the Magistrate Kluck the Klutz and from the Commonwealth Government lawyer fraudster Shane Hunter.  Of course, neither need worry as Magistrate Klutz has Judicial Immunity and shyster Shane Hunter who knows he is assisting a crime perpetrated by the Government against a disabled citizen, including EXPLOITATION of the DISABLED, to remain concealed, has Advocates' Immunity.  In Kluck's court, Due Process was abrogated, because the disabled old man had Special Needs that were not accommodated by Paul M Kluck. Hence, from that moment, Kluck's court became a nullity. Thus, from then, the disabled old man was denied Due Process.  Read on the transcript, how Magistrate Kluck ridiculed the disabled old man.

At the time of committing the Armed Robbery of the disabled old man, Henri Elias Rantala illegally arrested the disabled old man so as to keep him from his home while his home was ransacked and his yard was cleared of all of his possession to order of the Queensland Government, who wished to take control of his property in quick time, for The University of Queensland to use.  This was orchestrated by the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  Well, on 20th July, 2010, 22 days after the last day that the disabled old man tried to perform in the committal hearing, on 28th June, 2010, the Queensland Court of Appeal gave it decision regarding that illegal arrest on that day of the disabled old man by parasite cop Rantala.  In clear dicta the Court of Appeal raised the spectre of the gross criminality involved in the whole matter

This day's transcript is one continuous file/page.  These anchors when listed will be listed in sequence.
The three days when witnesses have actually given evidence have been similarly summarised with "anchors" [aka markers/tags], and each appears thus:
  1. Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  2. Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  3. Day 3: 28th June, 2010
This case has international consequences, as this action by the Commonwealth Prosecutor, given that the disabled old man has been thrown out of his home by a corrupt judicial system of the magistrates and District Courts, is a disgusting reflection upon the judicial principle of Due Process, for any country in the world. This will make Australia the laughing stock of the international justice community.  So much more so as all this has been done with the full knowledge of the Australian Attorney General, Robert McClelland.

RussellMathewsEmailSignatureDRA

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
International Disability Rights Advocate
invoking
UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
& UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
See my RESOUNDING VICTORY 20th July, 2010 in
Qld Court of Appeal

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of
      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND
Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]

PHPincludesPlagiocephaly/includedSeeMenuNewPlagiocephalyLinks.php

SEE:  Overview of multiple criminal frauds of me by Douglas Porter & The University of Queensland:



 Menu: Chief Justice Paul deJersey _v_ Court of Appeal President Margaret McMurdo; Judicial War Supreme Court of Qld


Menu: HaigReport's Chief Justice Paul deJersey _v_ Court of Appeal President Margaret McMurdo; Judicial War Supreme Court of Qld:


  1. Index: Chief Justice Paul deJersey _v_ Court of Appeal President Margaret McMurdo; Judicial War Supreme Court of Qld:
  2. Who Had Magistrate Topsy-Turvy Wally Walter Harvey Ehrich Conceal Paul deJersey Corporation Synod Diocese Brisbane Armed Robbery:


 Menu: Corporations ON NOTICE! Russell Mathews' Corporate Governance Shareholder DECREE


Menu: HaigReport's Corporations ON NOTICE! Russell Mathews' Corporate Governance Shareholder DECREE:


  1. Index: Corporations ON NOTICE! Russell Mathews' Corporate Governance Shareholder DECREE:



 Menu: Woolworths/BigW: The Experience by a disabled customer, of Woolworth's BULLYING & BigW's MISLEADING & DECEPTIVE CONDUCT


Menu: HaigReport's Woolworths/BigW: The Experience by a disabled customer, of Woolworth's BULLYING & BigW's MISLEADING & DECEPTIVE CONDUCT :


  1. Index: Woolworth's Bullying Disabled Customers; BigW's Smart Arse Manager & Misleading & Deceptive Conduct:
  2. Hear Two Big W Smart Arses being Smart Arses: Everett McMillan, Store Manager, Big W, Garden City Mt Gravatt; & Nathan at Big W Online:
  3. Who is Woolworths Big W, Smart Arse Manager Everett McMillan?:
  4. How this matter may be developed by me: Stand for Election as a Non-Executive Director of Woolworths Ltd & more:
  5. Woolworths BigW Store Manager Everett McMillan Violates Woolworths Fanciful Code Of Conduct; So What Should His Staff Do:
  6. Disability Discrimination By Woolworths BigW Store Manager Everett McMillan, BigW Garden City, Mt Gravatt, Brisbane:
  7. OPEN LETTER: Boards of Directors & Management, Woolworths Ltd: Complacent Breach Consumer Law Abuse Patronize Ridicule Customers:
  8. ATTN: Woolworths Shareholders: Woolworths & BigW Train Managers TO Bully, Cheat, Argue & Belittle Disabled Customers:
  9. OPEN LETTER Julie Coates Director of BIG W & Grant O'Brien Managing Director and CEO, Woolworths Ltd:

  10. 7th May, 2012 OPEN LETTER Grant O’Brien Managing Director & CEO Woolworths:
includedMenuPriorWoolworthsBigW.php

This is the Menu regarding Disability Discrimination by Woolworths of a Disabled Old Man with two wee Assistance Dogs:

  1. * Webletter dated 8th January, 2007 re FIRST Woolworths ATTACK and unlawful Disability discrimination.
  2. * my_PSP email_to_Woolworths_dated_8th January, 2007 advising of web-letter URL
  3. * WOOLWORTHS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of email of 8th January,2007.
  4. * WebReport dated 27th October, 2007 re SECOND Woolworths ATTACK and unlawful Disability discrimination.
  5. * my_PSP email_to_Woolworths_dated_27th October, 2007 advising of web-letter URL
  6. * WOOLWORTHS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of email of 27th October, 2007.
  7. * Email thread start 1st November, 2007, of Russell Mathews and Woolworths
  8. * Woolworths email of 2nd November, 2007 requesting repeat advice of URL.
  9. * Reference to earlier ATTACK by Woolworths.
  10. * Our LEGAL ASSESSMENT of the INCOMPETENT CLAYTON UTZ REPORT.
  11. * The INCOMPETENT CLAYTON UTZ REPORT






Menu: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:


  1. Index: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial::

  2. Considerations: How To Do It: Procedure To Follow: Advice, From High Court Registry::
  3. High Court of Australia Fees, Charges, For Application for Special Leave To Appeal: CASH::
  4. Documents: Proforma; Examples; Actual; Completed: Application for Special Leave To Appeal; AccompanyingDocuments; Draft Notice Of Appeal; Summary Of Argument::
  5. Ridiculous Pedantics: High Court Registry Fail Logic::
  6. My Form 23: My Application For Special Leave To Appeal, High Court of Australia::
  7. My Form 24: Draft Notice Of Appeal; High Court Australia:
  8. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry deemed defective, deemed not comply with High Court Rules, deemed Attachment as 'entire Document':
  9. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry found okay as I cropped a bit more image:
  10. My Form XX: Affidavit Of Service on Respondent in High Court Australia; here CDPP:
  11. My Form XY: Affidavit Of Lodgement to Lower Court, here to Queensland Court of Appeal:
  12. Required Editable files to download in Word.DOC format:
  13. Required Editable files to download in OpenOffice.odt format [my preference]:


 Menu: LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD:

Menu: HaigReport's LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD::


See: the Menu: for Campbell Newman LNP catholic ustashi nazi troika fraud in Qld

  1. More FRAUD & CORRUPTION from catholic Campbell Newman LNP catholic Land FRAUD:
  2. Index: LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD:
  3. Open Letter 2010/08/04 Corrupt BCC Lord Mayor Campbell Newman LNP_FRAUD:
  4. OPEN LETTER: Tony Abbott, Electors in Dickson & Rural Independents  re Peter Dutton FRAUD & bye-election in Dickson:



 Menu: Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!


Menu:Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!:

  1.  Index: Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!:
  2. 5th December, 2011: Public Open Email: Kate Jones, State Member, Ashgrove: Re Campbell Newman Guilty Armed Robbery: Qld Court of Appeal has Reserved its Decision::
  3. Latest Up-Date001: Campbell Newman Fraud/Corruption BUT labor Endemic Corruption: I_Warned TheLiberal/LNP: Dumped/Sacked Judy Magub:
  4. Actual Email to Katter's Australian Party, Bob Katter & Aidan McLindon re Campbell Newman & Armed Robbery:
  5. Latest Update002: Labor Promotes Corruption: Campbell Newman Condones Corruption: Katter's Party - No Substance: Greens Labor in Disguise:
  6. The Queensland Party: Savior of Democracy in Qld: Restore Queensland's Upper House of Parliament, the Legislative Council:

 Menu:  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!

PHPincludesCourtOfAppealOnTrial/includedMenuCourtOfAppealOnTrial.php

Menu:  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!!!


  1. Don Dale Commissioner Margaret White Judicial Corruption Connection:
  2. Affidavit for Court of Appeal: Why CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe Unfit to be a Judge due Judicial Fraud when barrister:
  3. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form27:
  4. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form29:
  5. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form38 Adduce Evidence:
  6. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Affidavit Adduce Evidence:
  7. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Deny Qualified Privilege Form27:
  8. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Unlawful Order Disability Discrimination Apprehended Bias Form27:
  9. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Unlawful Order Disability Discrimination Apprehended Bias Form29:
  10. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJ Spurious Michael Shanahan Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form27:
  11.  Appeal 25th November, 2011: Police Fraud & Disability Discrimination by Magistrate Paul Kluck, District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien, & CDPP's Shane Hunter:
  12.  Outline of Argument & Submission asAt 31st October, 2011 Appeal Qld Police Fraud & Disability Discrimination by Magistrate Paul Kluck, District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien, & CDPP Shane Hunter:
  13. Respondent's CDPP's Shane Hunter's Lies & Dishonesty in Outline of Argument for CA201/2011 Qld Court of Appeal re Qld police Fraud & Disability Discrimination: Magistrate Paul Kluck; District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien KJOB:
  14. My Response to Lies & Dishonesty in Respondent's CDPP's Shane Hunter's Outline of Argument for CA201/2011 Qld Court of Appeal re Qld police Fraud & Disability Discrimination: Magistrate Paul Kluck; District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien KJOB:
  15. Transcript of My Oral Submission on the day, 25th November, 2011, in Qld Court of Appeal, against Qld police corrupt charges to coverup Qld Government Armed Robbery of disabled citizen, before Magistate Paul M Kluck:
  16. Court of Appeal Short Hearing 25th November, 2011; Reserved Decision; Possible Way Forward - Conclusive Evidence: Armed Robbery; International Scrutiny::
  17. Decision: 13th December, 2011 [James S Douglas & Margaret White], Court of Appeal division of Supreme Court of Queensland Mathews v Commissioner of Police [2011] QCA 368 CA No 201 of 2011: :
  18. My Future Actions, after the 13/12/11 Refusal by Qld Court of Appeal of my Appeal::
  19. My request to the Qld Attorney-General to Honour His Duty to Apply to the Court to Set Aside The Miscarriage of Justice, Vexatious Litigant Order:
  20. Decision 12th August,2005: Justice Margaret White Order Remove To Conceal Fraud By Brisbane City Council & Qld Government BS4337_2005_QSC05-222Mathews_v_Morgan_Ors:
  21. Is Justice Margaret White Using Her Judicial Immunity To REPEATEDLY_Conceal Crime By Her Favoured University Of Queensland to StealHome Of Disabled Old Man?:
  22. The Decision of Glory of the Queensland Court of Appeal:
  23. Transcript: 20050601 Magistrates Court Transcript Fraud by Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich, [aka Magistrate Topsy Turvey, al la Queensland Court of Appeal], John Peden, Ms Prasley & Police Sergeant Terence G IND:
  24. Transcript: 20081217 Magistrates Court Transcript of Fraud & Farce byMagistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich & Police Sgt Cox:
  25. Index: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!
  26. CORRUPT GOVERNMENT Judge Henry George Fryberg protects CORRUPT GOVERNMENT ARMED ROBBERS:
  27. Earlier Mentions of Henry George Fryberg: the former article explains a little extra:



 Menu: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:


Menu: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:


  1. Index: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial::

  2. Considerations: How To Do It: Procedure To Follow: Advice, From High Court Registry::
  3. High Court of Australia Fees, Charges, For Application for Special Leave To Appeal: CASH::
  4. Documents: Proforma; Examples; Actual; Completed: Application for Special Leave To Appeal; AccompanyingDocuments; Draft Notice Of Appeal; Summary Of Argument::
  5. Ridiculous Pedantics: High Court Registry Fail Logic::
  6. My Form 23: My Application For Special Leave To Appeal, High Court of Australia::
  7. My Form 24: Draft Notice Of Appeal; High Court Australia:
  8. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry deemed defective, deemed not comply with High Court Rules, deemed Attachment as 'entire Document':
  9. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry found okay as I cropped a bit more image:
  10. My Form XX: Affidavit Of Service on Respondent in High Court Australia; here CDPP:
  11. My Form XY: Affidavit Of Lodgement to Lower Court, here to Queensland Court of Appeal:
  12. Required Editable files to download in Word.DOC format:
  13. Required Editable files to download in OpenOffice.odt format [my preference]:


 Menu: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld: The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ:

Menu: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld:  The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ:

  1.  Index: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld: The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ: :
  2. The 2011 Admission, Enrolment Scandal: Professor Paul Greenfield & Prof Michael Keniger resign over Undeserved Special Privilege for Greenfield's Daughter in PreMed course::
  3. Skeletons in the cupboard for Maurie McNarn ex-director of the Australian Defence Intelligence Organisation [ADIO] re Torture Abuse Murder Prisoner Rendition Abu Graib:
includedMenuProofSappideenWalkerLister.php

Menu: Proof: University of Qld law school Fraud: by Carolyn Sappideen, Geoff deQ. Walker & Andrew Lister:

  1. Proof, in Carolyn Sappideen's own handwriting of her denying me Natural Justice: Denying me my RIGHT to be Heard
  2. Geoffrey de Q. Walker's signed ADMISSION of his LYING as to why he denied me permission to study law
  3. NEW Geoffrey_deQuincey Walker, Dean of TC Bierne School of Law @ The University of Queensland, Now, ex- AAT Deputy President - NSW, Fabricates Criminal Defamatory Scenario to harm Disabled Student, To Ingratiate Himself To Corrupt Judges:
  4. Specific Details of How & Why Carolyn Sappideen Unlawfully denied me, Russell Mathews, Due Process at The University of Queensland, & Ramifications Now for the University of Western Sydney [UWS]:
  5. UWS Law Professor Carolyn Sappideen bullies disabled student with ILLEGAL conduct; ILLEGAL even if the student was not disabled:

 Menu:  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

includedMenuDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

Menu: Qld District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

G'day, This menu will collect the various mentions on our websites of our process of exposing the fraud and corruption in the Public Sector of Queensland and the Commonwealth of Australia.  So much of this corruption is in the court, but we believe we have found a 'headland' of Truth and Honesty in the Queensland Courts.  Regardless, we can take these legal matters to higher courts including UN Committees in Geneva Switzerland.  We believe we have been able to make these inroads into the corruption in Queensland and Austalia because of our websites.
  1. Submission to District Court re DCJ Griffin Recuse SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon 19th November, 2012:
  2. Submission to District Court re SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon & My Flu; 12th November, 2012:
  3. 2nd November, 2012 Unrepresented Disabled Defendant Teaches Human Rights Law To District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien:
  4. Submission To District Court DCJA Kerry O'Brien 19th October, 2012 Re Disability Arrangements Unlawful Order Is Disability Discrimination:
  5. 4th Oct 2012 Transcript DCJ Michael Shanahan Prejudges Appeal Without Jurisdiction Or Evidence Eager Misrepresent My Application To Recuse:
  6. Submission to & Appearance in District Court 4th October, 2012 Motion DCJ Michael Shanahan Disqualify Himself As catholic Due Repeated catholic Fraud, Corruption, Attempted Murder; Patsy Wolfe, Quentin Bryce, Jeff Spender; Apprehended Bias a la Ustashi, IRA, nazi:
  7. See the Outcome of my Submission [above] to mention 4th October, 2012:
  8. Magistrate Marshall Davies, Eager To Convict Innocent Disabled Man Targeted By Corrupt Police To Please Corrupt Police:
  9. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 24th August, 2012, DCJA Kerry John O'Brien Rejects Immunity from Prosecution Due Qualified Privilege Confirms SetUp by Government including Courts:
  10. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 31st July, 2012, Russell Mathews: DCJA Kerry O'Brien's back, admits ignorance, seems determined to not ensure Fair Hearing; Due Process. :
  11. Submission & Appearance to District Court 24th August, 2012 Motion Permanent Stay Qualified Privilege Social Moral Duty Expose Australian Corruption in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  12. Why Chief District Court Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe Should Disqualify From Dealing with RussellMathews,in Any Matter:
  13. Why District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien Should Disqualify From Dealing with Russell Mathews in Any Matter:
  14. Submission & Appearance to District Court "Interim Review" 31st July, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; Re DUTY of Court to Determine & Provide Accommodation of my Special Needs for Due Process & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  15. Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick Has Less Risk of Violent Attack As REAL Julie Maree Dick Is BAIT:
  16. Perjury, Fraud & Corruption Connection to "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Marie Dick:
  17. DCJ Leanne Clare nee HURLEY: Murder Pig Snr Sgt Chris HURLEY Palm Island killer Mulrunji Doomadgee, Why as DPP would she not charge her NAMESAKE?:
  18. District Court Transcript: Mention, 15th June, 2012, Russell Mathews: DUMB Chief Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe's prior professional misconduct returning to haunt her. :
  19. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:
  20. Submission to District Court Mention 15th June, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church:
  21. Hearing 16th May, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  22. Hearing 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  23. Decision 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  24. The August, 2011 [20110814] Update: on Court Case Alleging Russell Mathews' Use of a Carriage Service [Broadband] to harass but actually Exposing Even More police & political Corruption in Australia:
  25. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law does CRIMINAL FAVOUR for OTHER ISRCL 'members'
  26. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law {ISRCL} uses ISRCL EVIL contact to TARGET DISABLED PERSON
  27. Listing of Members & Directors of the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law
  28. International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Director's CRIME to DEFRAUD DISABLED PERSON
  29. What is the future for the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law After CRIME Exposure?
  30. Who are the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law?
  31. Anthony Gett sycophant to International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Evil judges:
  32. Index: District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien [We may move this file later, out of the Emails Menu: Now we have.]
  33. Submission #0001:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  34. Submission #0002:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  35. Initial General Submission to District Court coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien AO for mention 28th January, 2011
  36. Submission #0003 in Registrar's Reference; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 10AM 4th March, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another:
  37. Submission #0004 in Sec222, Justices Act 1886; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 9:30AM 16th May, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another/Commissioner of Police:
  38. State Crime Operations Command Pigs Steven Geoffrey Bignell & Brendan Scott Read [Now of KPMG] Con the Dicks To Help Police Crime
  39. Queensland Police Keep Clever Dick John Edward Dick & the REAL Julie Maree Dick On Ice To Further Police Fraud
  40. Medical Report of 20100806 ex Dr Rob Moyle re Special Needs Accommodated by Keyboard and Computer = Disability AIDS
  41. Dr Bennett's report 31st March, 1998, listing FOUR separate episodes of head injuries sustained by me

Menu: of Emails: Registry, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court emails of 20101104 re District Court coram Kerry O'Brien: Jo Stonebridge Emails Ending with Smart Arse Email Ex Smart Arse Deputy Regisrar Kerri
  2. More 20101104_District Court coram Kerry O'Brien Emails Ex District Court Jo Stonebridge & Deputy Registrar Kerri
  3. Jo StoneBridge, Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court Bogus Email Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  4. Smart Arse Email From Smart Arse Deputy Registrar Kerri
  5. Email 20101122 Jo Stonebridge District Court Sheriff & Marshal
  6. Commonwealth DPP_Handed Up Copy Of My Submission For Attention Judge Kerry John Obrien
  7. Jo Stonebridge Advises That I_Am Required To Attend Next Mention
  8. Jo StoneBridge Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court gives Bogus Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  9. District Court Registry Parasites Impede Disabled Old Man's Communication With the Court
  10. Qld Public Sector Parasite Jo Stonebridge Deems My Commuication With Court 'Not Appropriate'
  11. Jo Stonebridge Now Advises There Is No Charge for Transcripts in Criminal Matters
  12. My Direct Reproach to Jo Stonebridge for Impeding My Communication with the Court
  13. 20101206 Ken Wells Executive Officer to the Director of Courts [WOW - Big Deal] Bogus information Pittance
  14. My Advice to District Court That I_will Publish on the Web due to Her Stuffing Me Around
  15. My Advice to District Court That District Court Lacks Jurisdiction
  16. My Advice to District Court That I_Will Communicate As A_Courtesy
  17. District Court Ken Wells Response To My Reproach of Jo Stonebridge Re Courteous
MenuTranscriptsDistrictCourtKeyyOBrien

Menu: Transcripts, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 22nd November, 2010, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  2. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 28th January, 2011, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  3. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:


PHPincludesProofSappideenWalkerLister/includedOverviewMultipleUniversityQueenslandDouglasPorterFrauds.php

Overview, Synopsis, or Summary of Public Sector Parasites Bullying specifically The University of Queensland & its previous registrar [for 22 years], Douglas Porter:

When one has a great amount of factual material to relate, one has to organize it so the reader can enter the narrative.  With the internet and Google and other search engines, that is unlikely to be at the "beginning", [if there is such a thing as a "beginning"].  Basically, what I have to do is to have various levels of narrative.  One level needs to have all the facts connected in detail.  No group of facts is a closed group, but rather, facts or aspects of one group of facts, relate to, or are identical to, facts or aspects of other groups.  As well, the reader/visitor does not want to read everything ever written.  Hence I need to have various levels of summary.  One level of summary will summarize the detailed facts.  Above that, is another level of summary that will summarize a number of summaries, according to common factors or relationships, in the level below.  Sometimes, when writing the detailed facts level, another aspect, or one or more of those facts, may require a detailed analysis.   Of course, the factual situation can be viewed from a number of perspectives.  Thankfully, Google et al, will index all of those.

Menus will tend to serve that role of a summary, but merely one summary or overview..  This text could be viewed as a Menu in a narrative.  This section will link to the various parts of our websites that are referenced from here.

There are basically FOUR episodes where the University of Queensland has cheated, defrauded and discriminated against me because I am disabled.  There exists a great amount of overlap between the episodes.  Of course, the outcome of each was that I was cheated and defrauded badly.   These facts I relate reflect badly upon The University of Queensland administration and Douglas Porter in particular.

Chronologically, from 1992 four main episodes are, the Law School, in 1993, 1994 and 1995 at least, the maths department and the EPSA faculty in particular Andrew Lister in 1997 to 2001, at least, then in 2003 - 2006 the dumb femi-nazi "Queen" Janine Schmidt was "chief" librarian at UQ attacked, defrauded and discriminated against me because I was disabled.   The Criminal culminating fraud by Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland was Porter's secretly orchestrating the defrauding me of my home, for the benefit of the University of Queensland and the UQ college called St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of UQ, when Porter was secretly  the Chair of the Council that ran St Johns College.

I am a mathematician.  My greatest skills are in maths.  I guess that could be because I have always had a writing disability, undiagnosed until circa 1993.  In school, all my written work was poorly written.  Hence, as teachers who mark work, see it as a chore and tedious job to be finished as quickly as possible, judge a work by how it looks or feels to them, and gives a subjective mark.  With maths, the teachers would see the correct answer, the correct diagrams so I would receive full marks, regularly.

I returned to The University of Queensland [UQ] in 1991 doing maths.  I did well. At that time, I had hassles with public sector parasites, lying parasites and police so decided to study law at UQ.  That began the episode of repeated occasions of my being attacked, cheated and defrauded by the law school by particular individuals within the law school and within the administration of The University of Queensland.   The University of Queensland was vicariously liable for that.  The next major episode occurred with the Maths department part of the Engineering, Physical science & Architecture "Super" faculty under the Executive Dean Andrew Lister.

/PHPincludesCorruptBrisbaneDiocese/includedMenuJohnMorgan.php Menu: CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan, @ St Johns College, UQ:
  1. PROOF of the 2001 FRAUD  by CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Morgan
  2. Directory of links about Criminal parasite priest Rev Canon John Leslie Morgan:
  3. Directory of Anglican CORRUPTION matters:
  4. Anglicans conspire to steal the home of disabled with aid of political & judicial corruption
  5. PROOF of another instance that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is yet again a LIAR
  6. PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is Incompetent
  7. PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is a BULLY
  8. Email from Morgan showing he is a silly malicious ratbag 
  9. Is this Primate Aspinall's BUSINESS ACUMEN?
  10. Anglican priest bullies DISABLED Neighbour to STEAL his HOME.
  11. Yet another Morgan LIE that neither he nor St John's College had any documents about me..  I had to push it all the way to the Privacy Commission, who Morgan was repeatedly ignoring.  He really thinks he is god.
  12. Anglican CORRUPTION EXPOSED
  13. Another Morgan LIE
  14. One of the many examples of MONEY & FRAUD being motivator of 'Rev' John Morgan
  15. $1Mill+ FRAUD- St Johns College & University of Queensland
  16. Australian CRIMINAL LAW Journal ISSN: 1321-6562 26 February, 2007. Issue #: 200702
  17. FRAUD on Uni Students: $1,500 RENT PER WEEK, for an ASBESTOS RIDDEN dump.
  18. Is FRAUD the answer for Anglican return on investment?

http://HaigReport.com/aaaaMenu/Menus/includedMenuDefraudingMeMyHome.php

LinkToAspinallInMorganPanel This Profile Panel re the dumb parasitic anglican priest John Leslie Morgan, links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud by archbishop Phillip Aspinall of a vulnerable disabled guy where anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall headed up the scheme to steal the home of this vulnerable disabled guy.

http://HaigReport.com/Photos/100_0663_20070120CanonRevProfDrJohnLeslieMorganWardenStJohnsCollegeUniversityQueenslandHidingBehindToiletRolls_cr30pc.jpg
About this despicable life form , Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, now Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.

This photo was taken in a supermarket, on the 20th January, 2007 at 4:54PM Brisbane, Australia time, when Morgan was attemting to not be photographed by hiding behind some toilet rolls.

This individual is evil and he escapes scrutiny as he is a "priest".  Over time I have collected much evidence about his evil and criminal actions and published it.  I have assembled that into a menu.  I now include that menu here.
/PHPincludesCorruptBrisbaneDiocese/includedMenuJohnMorgan.php Menu: CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan, @ St Johns College, UQ:
*  PROOF of the 2001 FRAUD  by CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Morgan
*  Directory of links about Criminal parasite priest Rev Canon John Leslie Morgan:
*  Directory of Anglican CORRUPTION matters:
*  Anglicans conspire to steal the home of disabled with aid of political & judicial corruption
*  PROOF of another instance that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is yet again a LIAR
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is Incompetent
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is a BULLY
*  Email from Morgan showing he is a silly malicious ratbag 
*  Is this Primate Aspinall's BUSINESS ACUMEN?
*  Anglican priest bullies DISABLED Neighbour to STEAL his HOME.
*  Yet another Morgan LIE that neither he nor St John's College had any documents about me..  I had to push it all the way to the Privacy Commission, who Morgan was repeatedly ignoring.  He really thinks he is god.
*  Anglican CORRUPTION EXPOSED
*  Another Morgan LIE
*  One of the many examples of MONEY & FRAUD being motivator of 'Rev' John Morgan
*  $1Mill+ FRAUD- St Johns College & University of Queensland
*  Australian CRIMINAL LAW Journal ISSN: 1321-6562 26 February, 2007. Issue #: 200702
*  FRAUD on Uni Students: $1,500 RENT PER WEEK, for an ASBESTOS RIDDEN dump.
*  Is FRAUD the answer for Anglican return on investment?

We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland. 


 Menu: LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD:

Menu: HaigReport's LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD::


See: the Menu: for Campbell Newman LNP catholic ustashi nazi troika fraud in Qld

  1. More FRAUD & CORRUPTION from catholic Campbell Newman LNP catholic Land FRAUD:
  2. Index: LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD:
  3. Open Letter 2010/08/04 Corrupt BCC Lord Mayor Campbell Newman LNP_FRAUD:
  4. OPEN LETTER: Tony Abbott, Electors in Dickson & Rural Independents  re Peter Dutton FRAUD & bye-election in Dickson:



 Menu: Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!


Menu:Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!:

  1.  Index: Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!:
  2. 5th December, 2011: Public Open Email: Kate Jones, State Member, Ashgrove: Re Campbell Newman Guilty Armed Robbery: Qld Court of Appeal has Reserved its Decision::
  3. Latest Up-Date001: Campbell Newman Fraud/Corruption BUT labor Endemic Corruption: I_Warned TheLiberal/LNP: Dumped/Sacked Judy Magub:
  4. Actual Email to Katter's Australian Party, Bob Katter & Aidan McLindon re Campbell Newman & Armed Robbery:
  5. Latest Update002: Labor Promotes Corruption: Campbell Newman Condones Corruption: Katter's Party - No Substance: Greens Labor in Disguise:
  6. The Queensland Party: Savior of Democracy in Qld: Restore Queensland's Upper House of Parliament, the Legislative Council:

 Menu:  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!

PHPincludesCourtOfAppealOnTrial/includedMenuCourtOfAppealOnTrial.php

Menu:  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!!!


  1. Don Dale Commissioner Margaret White Judicial Corruption Connection:
  2. Affidavit for Court of Appeal: Why CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe Unfit to be a Judge due Judicial Fraud when barrister:
  3. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form27:
  4. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form29:
  5. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form38 Adduce Evidence:
  6. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Affidavit Adduce Evidence:
  7. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Deny Qualified Privilege Form27:
  8. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Unlawful Order Disability Discrimination Apprehended Bias Form27:
  9. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Unlawful Order Disability Discrimination Apprehended Bias Form29:
  10. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJ Spurious Michael Shanahan Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form27:
  11.  Appeal 25th November, 2011: Police Fraud & Disability Discrimination by Magistrate Paul Kluck, District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien, & CDPP's Shane Hunter:
  12.  Outline of Argument & Submission asAt 31st October, 2011 Appeal Qld Police Fraud & Disability Discrimination by Magistrate Paul Kluck, District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien, & CDPP Shane Hunter:
  13. Respondent's CDPP's Shane Hunter's Lies & Dishonesty in Outline of Argument for CA201/2011 Qld Court of Appeal re Qld police Fraud & Disability Discrimination: Magistrate Paul Kluck; District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien KJOB:
  14. My Response to Lies & Dishonesty in Respondent's CDPP's Shane Hunter's Outline of Argument for CA201/2011 Qld Court of Appeal re Qld police Fraud & Disability Discrimination: Magistrate Paul Kluck; District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien KJOB:
  15. Transcript of My Oral Submission on the day, 25th November, 2011, in Qld Court of Appeal, against Qld police corrupt charges to coverup Qld Government Armed Robbery of disabled citizen, before Magistate Paul M Kluck:
  16. Court of Appeal Short Hearing 25th November, 2011; Reserved Decision; Possible Way Forward - Conclusive Evidence: Armed Robbery; International Scrutiny::
  17. Decision: 13th December, 2011 [James S Douglas & Margaret White], Court of Appeal division of Supreme Court of Queensland Mathews v Commissioner of Police [2011] QCA 368 CA No 201 of 2011: :
  18. My Future Actions, after the 13/12/11 Refusal by Qld Court of Appeal of my Appeal::
  19. My request to the Qld Attorney-General to Honour His Duty to Apply to the Court to Set Aside The Miscarriage of Justice, Vexatious Litigant Order:
  20. Decision 12th August,2005: Justice Margaret White Order Remove To Conceal Fraud By Brisbane City Council & Qld Government BS4337_2005_QSC05-222Mathews_v_Morgan_Ors:
  21. Is Justice Margaret White Using Her Judicial Immunity To REPEATEDLY_Conceal Crime By Her Favoured University Of Queensland to StealHome Of Disabled Old Man?:
  22. The Decision of Glory of the Queensland Court of Appeal:
  23. Transcript: 20050601 Magistrates Court Transcript Fraud by Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich, [aka Magistrate Topsy Turvey, al la Queensland Court of Appeal], John Peden, Ms Prasley & Police Sergeant Terence G IND:
  24. Transcript: 20081217 Magistrates Court Transcript of Fraud & Farce byMagistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich & Police Sgt Cox:
  25. Index: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!
  26. CORRUPT GOVERNMENT Judge Henry George Fryberg protects CORRUPT GOVERNMENT ARMED ROBBERS:
  27. Earlier Mentions of Henry George Fryberg: the former article explains a little extra:



 Menu: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:


Menu: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:


  1. Index: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial::

  2. Considerations: How To Do It: Procedure To Follow: Advice, From High Court Registry::
  3. High Court of Australia Fees, Charges, For Application for Special Leave To Appeal: CASH::
  4. Documents: Proforma; Examples; Actual; Completed: Application for Special Leave To Appeal; AccompanyingDocuments; Draft Notice Of Appeal; Summary Of Argument::
  5. Ridiculous Pedantics: High Court Registry Fail Logic::
  6. My Form 23: My Application For Special Leave To Appeal, High Court of Australia::
  7. My Form 24: Draft Notice Of Appeal; High Court Australia:
  8. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry deemed defective, deemed not comply with High Court Rules, deemed Attachment as 'entire Document':
  9. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry found okay as I cropped a bit more image:
  10. My Form XX: Affidavit Of Service on Respondent in High Court Australia; here CDPP:
  11. My Form XY: Affidavit Of Lodgement to Lower Court, here to Queensland Court of Appeal:
  12. Required Editable files to download in Word.DOC format:
  13. Required Editable files to download in OpenOffice.odt format [my preference]:


 Menu: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld: The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ:

Menu: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld:  The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ:

  1.  Index: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld: The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ: :
  2. The 2011 Admission, Enrolment Scandal: Professor Paul Greenfield & Prof Michael Keniger resign over Undeserved Special Privilege for Greenfield's Daughter in PreMed course::
  3. Skeletons in the cupboard for Maurie McNarn ex-director of the Australian Defence Intelligence Organisation [ADIO] re Torture Abuse Murder Prisoner Rendition Abu Graib:
includedMenuProofSappideenWalkerLister.php

Menu: Proof: University of Qld law school Fraud: by Carolyn Sappideen, Geoff deQ. Walker & Andrew Lister:

  1. Proof, in Carolyn Sappideen's own handwriting of her denying me Natural Justice: Denying me my RIGHT to be Heard
  2. Geoffrey de Q. Walker's signed ADMISSION of his LYING as to why he denied me permission to study law
  3. NEW Geoffrey_deQuincey Walker, Dean of TC Bierne School of Law @ The University of Queensland, Now, ex- AAT Deputy President - NSW, Fabricates Criminal Defamatory Scenario to harm Disabled Student, To Ingratiate Himself To Corrupt Judges:
  4. Specific Details of How & Why Carolyn Sappideen Unlawfully denied me, Russell Mathews, Due Process at The University of Queensland, & Ramifications Now for the University of Western Sydney [UWS]:
  5. UWS Law Professor Carolyn Sappideen bullies disabled student with ILLEGAL conduct; ILLEGAL even if the student was not disabled:

 Menu:  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

includedMenuDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

Menu: Qld District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

G'day, This menu will collect the various mentions on our websites of our process of exposing the fraud and corruption in the Public Sector of Queensland and the Commonwealth of Australia.  So much of this corruption is in the court, but we believe we have found a 'headland' of Truth and Honesty in the Queensland Courts.  Regardless, we can take these legal matters to higher courts including UN Committees in Geneva Switzerland.  We believe we have been able to make these inroads into the corruption in Queensland and Austalia because of our websites.
  1. Submission to District Court re DCJ Griffin Recuse SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon 19th November, 2012:
  2. Submission to District Court re SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon & My Flu; 12th November, 2012:
  3. 2nd November, 2012 Unrepresented Disabled Defendant Teaches Human Rights Law To District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien:
  4. Submission To District Court DCJA Kerry O'Brien 19th October, 2012 Re Disability Arrangements Unlawful Order Is Disability Discrimination:
  5. 4th Oct 2012 Transcript DCJ Michael Shanahan Prejudges Appeal Without Jurisdiction Or Evidence Eager Misrepresent My Application To Recuse:
  6. Submission to & Appearance in District Court 4th October, 2012 Motion DCJ Michael Shanahan Disqualify Himself As catholic Due Repeated catholic Fraud, Corruption, Attempted Murder; Patsy Wolfe, Quentin Bryce, Jeff Spender; Apprehended Bias a la Ustashi, IRA, nazi:
  7. See the Outcome of my Submission [above] to mention 4th October, 2012:
  8. Magistrate Marshall Davies, Eager To Convict Innocent Disabled Man Targeted By Corrupt Police To Please Corrupt Police:
  9. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 24th August, 2012, DCJA Kerry John O'Brien Rejects Immunity from Prosecution Due Qualified Privilege Confirms SetUp by Government including Courts:
  10. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 31st July, 2012, Russell Mathews: DCJA Kerry O'Brien's back, admits ignorance, seems determined to not ensure Fair Hearing; Due Process. :
  11. Submission & Appearance to District Court 24th August, 2012 Motion Permanent Stay Qualified Privilege Social Moral Duty Expose Australian Corruption in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  12. Why Chief District Court Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe Should Disqualify From Dealing with RussellMathews,in Any Matter:
  13. Why District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien Should Disqualify From Dealing with Russell Mathews in Any Matter:
  14. Submission & Appearance to District Court "Interim Review" 31st July, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; Re DUTY of Court to Determine & Provide Accommodation of my Special Needs for Due Process & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  15. Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick Has Less Risk of Violent Attack As REAL Julie Maree Dick Is BAIT:
  16. Perjury, Fraud & Corruption Connection to "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Marie Dick:
  17. DCJ Leanne Clare nee HURLEY: Murder Pig Snr Sgt Chris HURLEY Palm Island killer Mulrunji Doomadgee, Why as DPP would she not charge her NAMESAKE?:
  18. District Court Transcript: Mention, 15th June, 2012, Russell Mathews: DUMB Chief Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe's prior professional misconduct returning to haunt her. :
  19. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:
  20. Submission to District Court Mention 15th June, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church:
  21. Hearing 16th May, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  22. Hearing 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  23. Decision 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  24. The August, 2011 [20110814] Update: on Court Case Alleging Russell Mathews' Use of a Carriage Service [Broadband] to harass but actually Exposing Even More police & political Corruption in Australia:
  25. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law does CRIMINAL FAVOUR for OTHER ISRCL 'members'
  26. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law {ISRCL} uses ISRCL EVIL contact to TARGET DISABLED PERSON
  27. Listing of Members & Directors of the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law
  28. International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Director's CRIME to DEFRAUD DISABLED PERSON
  29. What is the future for the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law After CRIME Exposure?
  30. Who are the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law?
  31. Anthony Gett sycophant to International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Evil judges:
  32. Index: District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien [We may move this file later, out of the Emails Menu: Now we have.]
  33. Submission #0001:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  34. Submission #0002:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  35. Initial General Submission to District Court coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien AO for mention 28th January, 2011
  36. Submission #0003 in Registrar's Reference; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 10AM 4th March, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another:
  37. Submission #0004 in Sec222, Justices Act 1886; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 9:30AM 16th May, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another/Commissioner of Police:
  38. State Crime Operations Command Pigs Steven Geoffrey Bignell & Brendan Scott Read [Now of KPMG] Con the Dicks To Help Police Crime
  39. Queensland Police Keep Clever Dick John Edward Dick & the REAL Julie Maree Dick On Ice To Further Police Fraud
  40. Medical Report of 20100806 ex Dr Rob Moyle re Special Needs Accommodated by Keyboard and Computer = Disability AIDS
  41. Dr Bennett's report 31st March, 1998, listing FOUR separate episodes of head injuries sustained by me

Menu: of Emails: Registry, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court emails of 20101104 re District Court coram Kerry O'Brien: Jo Stonebridge Emails Ending with Smart Arse Email Ex Smart Arse Deputy Regisrar Kerri
  2. More 20101104_District Court coram Kerry O'Brien Emails Ex District Court Jo Stonebridge & Deputy Registrar Kerri
  3. Jo StoneBridge, Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court Bogus Email Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  4. Smart Arse Email From Smart Arse Deputy Registrar Kerri
  5. Email 20101122 Jo Stonebridge District Court Sheriff & Marshal
  6. Commonwealth DPP_Handed Up Copy Of My Submission For Attention Judge Kerry John Obrien
  7. Jo Stonebridge Advises That I_Am Required To Attend Next Mention
  8. Jo StoneBridge Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court gives Bogus Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  9. District Court Registry Parasites Impede Disabled Old Man's Communication With the Court
  10. Qld Public Sector Parasite Jo Stonebridge Deems My Commuication With Court 'Not Appropriate'
  11. Jo Stonebridge Now Advises There Is No Charge for Transcripts in Criminal Matters
  12. My Direct Reproach to Jo Stonebridge for Impeding My Communication with the Court
  13. 20101206 Ken Wells Executive Officer to the Director of Courts [WOW - Big Deal] Bogus information Pittance
  14. My Advice to District Court That I_will Publish on the Web due to Her Stuffing Me Around
  15. My Advice to District Court That District Court Lacks Jurisdiction
  16. My Advice to District Court That I_Will Communicate As A_Courtesy
  17. District Court Ken Wells Response To My Reproach of Jo Stonebridge Re Courteous
MenuTranscriptsDistrictCourtKeyyOBrien

Menu: Transcripts, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 22nd November, 2010, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  2. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 28th January, 2011, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  3. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:


PHPincludesProofSappideenWalkerLister/includedOverviewMultipleUniversityQueenslandDouglasPorterFrauds.php

Overview, Synopsis, or Summary of Public Sector Parasites Bullying specifically The University of Queensland & its previous registrar [for 22 years], Douglas Porter:

When one has a great amount of factual material to relate, one has to organize it so the reader can enter the narrative.  With the internet and Google and other search engines, that is unlikely to be at the "beginning", [if there is such a thing as a "beginning"].  Basically, what I have to do is to have various levels of narrative.  One level needs to have all the facts connected in detail.  No group of facts is a closed group, but rather, facts or aspects of one group of facts, relate to, or are identical to, facts or aspects of other groups.  As well, the reader/visitor does not want to read everything ever written.  Hence I need to have various levels of summary.  One level of summary will summarize the detailed facts.  Above that, is another level of summary that will summarize a number of summaries, according to common factors or relationships, in the level below.  Sometimes, when writing the detailed facts level, another aspect, or one or more of those facts, may require a detailed analysis.   Of course, the factual situation can be viewed from a number of perspectives.  Thankfully, Google et al, will index all of those.

Menus will tend to serve that role of a summary, but merely one summary or overview..  This text could be viewed as a Menu in a narrative.  This section will link to the various parts of our websites that are referenced from here.

There are basically FOUR episodes where the University of Queensland has cheated, defrauded and discriminated against me because I am disabled.  There exists a great amount of overlap between the episodes.  Of course, the outcome of each was that I was cheated and defrauded badly.   These facts I relate reflect badly upon The University of Queensland administration and Douglas Porter in particular.

Chronologically, from 1992 four main episodes are, the Law School, in 1993, 1994 and 1995 at least, the maths department and the EPSA faculty in particular Andrew Lister in 1997 to 2001, at least, then in 2003 - 2006 the dumb femi-nazi "Queen" Janine Schmidt was "chief" librarian at UQ attacked, defrauded and discriminated against me because I was disabled.   The Criminal culminating fraud by Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland was Porter's secretly orchestrating the defrauding me of my home, for the benefit of the University of Queensland and the UQ college called St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of UQ, when Porter was secretly  the Chair of the Council that ran St Johns College.

I am a mathematician.  My greatest skills are in maths.  I guess that could be because I have always had a writing disability, undiagnosed until circa 1993.  In school, all my written work was poorly written.  Hence, as teachers who mark work, see it as a chore and tedious job to be finished as quickly as possible, judge a work by how it looks or feels to them, and gives a subjective mark.  With maths, the teachers would see the correct answer, the correct diagrams so I would receive full marks, regularly.

I returned to The University of Queensland [UQ] in 1991 doing maths.  I did well. At that time, I had hassles with public sector parasites, lying parasites and police so decided to study law at UQ.  That began the episode of repeated occasions of my being attacked, cheated and defrauded by the law school by particular individuals within the law school and within the administration of The University of Queensland.   The University of Queensland was vicariously liable for that.  The next major episode occurred with the Maths department part of the Engineering, Physical science & Architecture "Super" faculty under the Executive Dean Andrew Lister.

New Document New Document

Collected Menus Below for the earlier coverage of a number of instances of the Top Down complete systemic corruption at The University of Qld:

includedMenuProofSappideenWalkerLister.php

Menu: Proof: University of Qld law school Fraud: by Carolyn Sappideen, Geoff deQ. Walker & Andrew Lister:

  1. Proof, in Carolyn Sappideen's own handwriting of her denying me Natural Justice: Denying me my RIGHT to be Heard
  2. Geoffrey de Q. Walker's signed ADMISSION of his LYING as to why he denied me permission to study law
  3. NEW Geoffrey_deQuincey Walker, Dean of TC Bierne School of Law @ The University of Queensland, Now, ex- AAT Deputy President - NSW, Fabricates Criminal Defamatory Scenario to harm Disabled Student, To Ingratiate Himself To Corrupt Judges:
  4. Specific Details of How & Why Carolyn Sappideen Unlawfully denied me, Russell Mathews, Due Process at The University of Queensland, & Ramifications Now for the University of Western Sydney [UWS]:
  5. UWS Law Professor Carolyn Sappideen bullies disabled student with ILLEGAL conduct; ILLEGAL even if the student was not disabled:
PHPincludesPlagiocephaly/includedSeeMenuNewPlagiocephalyLinks.php

SEE:  Overview of multiple criminal frauds of me by Douglas Porter & The University of Queensland:

/PHPincludesBewareAvoidMathsDeptUQ/includedMenuBewareAvoidMathsDeptUQ.php

Menu: Beware, & Avoid Maths Dept University of Qld:<

  1. See the DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE FROM UQ files ProofBurrageGatesListerPorterFraudMathsDeptUQ
  2. See the DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE FROM UQ files ProofSappideenWalkerListerFraudLawUQ
  3. Index: Reasons to Beware, & Avoid the Mathematics Department @ The University of Queensland:
  4. Dr Elizabeth J Billington, Evil, Wicked but Dumb Fraud Bitch Whore Act  & "I Don't Have To Tell You".
  5. View Documentary Evidence of Whose Fraudulent Directions & Instructions Elizabeth Billington obeyed:
  6. Dr Kevin E. Gates; MN475 Fraud by Evil Criminal Bludger Liar Cheat & Parasite:
  7. MN475 Fraud & Corruption: Question 4.7.7:
  8. Professor Kevin Burrage; Backed The Wrong Side: the Evil, Criminal, Bludger, Liar, Cheat & Parasite Side:
  9. Professor Kevin Burrage; Now At Oxford University, in UK; New College & QUT Brisbane:
  10. Professor Kevin Burrage; Illegally Discriminated Against Disabled Student:
  11. Professor Kevin Burrage; Research Fraud, by Evil, Criminal, Bludger, Liar, Cheat & Parasite:
  12. University of Queensland Senate Student Appeals Committee [UQSSAC] [SSAC]:
  13. Douglas Porter, Evil Wicked Fraudster with his Corrupt, Criminal Nature On Display yet Again:
  14. Trevor J. Grigg, of Carisgold Pty Ltd: A Career of Evil Wicked Bully, Cheat, & Parasite:
  15. Andrew Lister: A Career as an Evil Wicked Bully, Cheat, & Parasite, One of Hay's "Seven Sycophants":
  16. View Documentary Evidence of Where Andrew Lister was previously Acting against the Interests of Russell Mathews
PHPincludesPlagiocephaly/includedSeeMenuNewPlagiocephalyLinks.php

SEE:  Overview of multiple criminal frauds of me by Douglas Porter & The University of Queensland:

The 'Queen' Janine Schmidt, University of Queensland LAND FRAUD MENU:
Menu: NaziBully 'Queen' Janine SCHMIDT on our HaigReport 'Retribution' Website:
  1. NaziBully 'Queen' Janine SCHMIDT on our HaigReport RETRIBUTION Website
  2. Mrs Linda Bird, another University of Queensland Post-Menopausal FAT FRAUDSTER, Public Sector Parasite
  3. 'Queen' Janine's mental minion Catherine Ann Geraghty finds lying, cheating and bullying the disabled, EXCITING
  4. Ann Tilbury is GUILTY of Criminal Assault on an Officer of the Court who was Serving her with a Summons:
  5. See the TILBURY connection to the Rhodes Scholarship BLOOD MONEY Scandal
  6. See UQ Criminal Richard Zebrovius Admission of Dangerous Driving for Douglas Porter fraud
Menu for Our New Dedicated 'Queen' Janine Schmidt Website
  1. Home Page for Our New Dedicated 'Queen' Janine Schmidt Website
  2. 'Queen' Janine Schmidt Email of 20090909 Resign, Sack or Leave Decision as Trenholme Director of Libraries, McGill Uni, Montreal, Canada.
  3. Consequences for 'Queen' Janine Schmidt, of her NAZI BULLYING  of me, and the INTERNET.
  4. Page for Links to other mentions, BY OTHER PUBLISHERS, of the 'Queen' Janine Schmidt, NAZI BULLY, on the Internet.
Menu for Our Earlier Mentions and Evidence of actions of NAZI BULLY 'Queen' Janine Schmidt at The University of Queensland: [& this Menu will go in each of these]
  1. A little early history of this Nazi Bully 'Queen' Janine Schmidt
  2. The EARLY Documented Advice [by FOI] from Registrar that I am disabled and Legally entitled to be accompanied by my Assistance dogs:
  3. Blog [now closed] entries from a number of Sources of this 'Queen' Janine's NAZI BULLY ACTIONS.
  4. An UPDATE on the early history of this Nazi Bully 'Queen' Janine Schmidt
  5. 'Queen' Janine Schmidt Had her Minion report my Assistance Dogs, so, to have them abducted from outside the Library, after 'Queen' Janine had prevented their accompanying me in the library.
  6. The Registrar's Secretary, "TilBULLY" was happy to disobey her boss to please 'Queen' Janine, & RECORDED IT.
  7. The email to Schmidt from her boss, the Registrar of The University of Queensland. re the LAW showing 'Queen' Janine Schmidt's continued intransigence, even after two years.
  8. Online Version: [3Mb]  PRINT JOURNAL: The University of Queensland Alumni Journal ISSN: 1834-660X 23 April, 2007. Issue #: 200701
includedMenuDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

Menu: Qld District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

G'day, This menu will collect the various mentions on our websites of our process of exposing the fraud and corruption in the Public Sector of Queensland and the Commonwealth of Australia.  So much of this corruption is in the court, but we believe we have found a 'headland' of Truth and Honesty in the Queensland Courts.  Regardless, we can take these legal matters to higher courts including UN Committees in Geneva Switzerland.  We believe we have been able to make these inroads into the corruption in Queensland and Austalia because of our websites.
  1. Submission to District Court re DCJ Griffin Recuse SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon 19th November, 2012:
  2. Submission to District Court re SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon & My Flu; 12th November, 2012:
  3. 2nd November, 2012 Unrepresented Disabled Defendant Teaches Human Rights Law To District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien:
  4. Submission To District Court DCJA Kerry O'Brien 19th October, 2012 Re Disability Arrangements Unlawful Order Is Disability Discrimination:
  5. 4th Oct 2012 Transcript DCJ Michael Shanahan Prejudges Appeal Without Jurisdiction Or Evidence Eager Misrepresent My Application To Recuse:
  6. Submission to & Appearance in District Court 4th October, 2012 Motion DCJ Michael Shanahan Disqualify Himself As catholic Due Repeated catholic Fraud, Corruption, Attempted Murder; Patsy Wolfe, Quentin Bryce, Jeff Spender; Apprehended Bias a la Ustashi, IRA, nazi:
  7. See the Outcome of my Submission [above] to mention 4th October, 2012:
  8. Magistrate Marshall Davies, Eager To Convict Innocent Disabled Man Targeted By Corrupt Police To Please Corrupt Police:
  9. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 24th August, 2012, DCJA Kerry John O'Brien Rejects Immunity from Prosecution Due Qualified Privilege Confirms SetUp by Government including Courts:
  10. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 31st July, 2012, Russell Mathews: DCJA Kerry O'Brien's back, admits ignorance, seems determined to not ensure Fair Hearing; Due Process. :
  11. Submission & Appearance to District Court 24th August, 2012 Motion Permanent Stay Qualified Privilege Social Moral Duty Expose Australian Corruption in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  12. Why Chief District Court Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe Should Disqualify From Dealing with RussellMathews,in Any Matter:
  13. Why District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien Should Disqualify From Dealing with Russell Mathews in Any Matter:
  14. Submission & Appearance to District Court "Interim Review" 31st July, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; Re DUTY of Court to Determine & Provide Accommodation of my Special Needs for Due Process & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  15. Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick Has Less Risk of Violent Attack As REAL Julie Maree Dick Is BAIT:
  16. Perjury, Fraud & Corruption Connection to "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Marie Dick:
  17. DCJ Leanne Clare nee HURLEY: Murder Pig Snr Sgt Chris HURLEY Palm Island killer Mulrunji Doomadgee, Why as DPP would she not charge her NAMESAKE?:
  18. District Court Transcript: Mention, 15th June, 2012, Russell Mathews: DUMB Chief Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe's prior professional misconduct returning to haunt her. :
  19. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:
  20. Submission to District Court Mention 15th June, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church:
  21. Hearing 16th May, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  22. Hearing 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  23. Decision 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  24. The August, 2011 [20110814] Update: on Court Case Alleging Russell Mathews' Use of a Carriage Service [Broadband] to harass but actually Exposing Even More police & political Corruption in Australia:
  25. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law does CRIMINAL FAVOUR for OTHER ISRCL 'members'
  26. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law {ISRCL} uses ISRCL EVIL contact to TARGET DISABLED PERSON
  27. Listing of Members & Directors of the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law
  28. International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Director's CRIME to DEFRAUD DISABLED PERSON
  29. What is the future for the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law After CRIME Exposure?
  30. Who are the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law?
  31. Anthony Gett sycophant to International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Evil judges:
  32. Index: District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien [We may move this file later, out of the Emails Menu: Now we have.]
  33. Submission #0001:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  34. Submission #0002:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  35. Initial General Submission to District Court coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien AO for mention 28th January, 2011
  36. Submission #0003 in Registrar's Reference; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 10AM 4th March, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another:
  37. Submission #0004 in Sec222, Justices Act 1886; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 9:30AM 16th May, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another/Commissioner of Police:
  38. State Crime Operations Command Pigs Steven Geoffrey Bignell & Brendan Scott Read [Now of KPMG] Con the Dicks To Help Police Crime
  39. Queensland Police Keep Clever Dick John Edward Dick & the REAL Julie Maree Dick On Ice To Further Police Fraud
  40. Medical Report of 20100806 ex Dr Rob Moyle re Special Needs Accommodated by Keyboard and Computer = Disability AIDS
  41. Dr Bennett's report 31st March, 1998, listing FOUR separate episodes of head injuries sustained by me
PHPincludesPlagiocephaly/includedSeeMenuNewPlagiocephalyLinks.php

SEE:  Overview of multiple criminal frauds of me by Douglas Porter & The University of Queensland:

Menu: of Emails: Registry, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court emails of 20101104 re District Court coram Kerry O'Brien: Jo Stonebridge Emails Ending with Smart Arse Email Ex Smart Arse Deputy Regisrar Kerri
  2. More 20101104_District Court coram Kerry O'Brien Emails Ex District Court Jo Stonebridge & Deputy Registrar Kerri
  3. Jo StoneBridge, Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court Bogus Email Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  4. Smart Arse Email From Smart Arse Deputy Registrar Kerri
  5. Email 20101122 Jo Stonebridge District Court Sheriff & Marshal
  6. Commonwealth DPP_Handed Up Copy Of My Submission For Attention Judge Kerry John Obrien
  7. Jo Stonebridge Advises That I_Am Required To Attend Next Mention
  8. Jo StoneBridge Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court gives Bogus Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  9. District Court Registry Parasites Impede Disabled Old Man's Communication With the Court
  10. Qld Public Sector Parasite Jo Stonebridge Deems My Commuication With Court 'Not Appropriate'
  11. Jo Stonebridge Now Advises There Is No Charge for Transcripts in Criminal Matters
  12. My Direct Reproach to Jo Stonebridge for Impeding My Communication with the Court
  13. 20101206 Ken Wells Executive Officer to the Director of Courts [WOW - Big Deal] Bogus information Pittance
  14. My Advice to District Court That I_will Publish on the Web due to Her Stuffing Me Around
  15. My Advice to District Court That District Court Lacks Jurisdiction
  16. My Advice to District Court That I_Will Communicate As A_Courtesy
  17. District Court Ken Wells Response To My Reproach of Jo Stonebridge Re Courteous
MenuTranscriptsDistrictCourtKeyyOBrien

Menu: Transcripts, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 22nd November, 2010, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  2. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 28th January, 2011, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  3. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:


includedMenuAvengerRevengeRetribution.php.html

Menu: Retribution for FRAUD & BULLYING by Douglas Porter & The University of Qld, of DISABLED old man.

[A Cascading Drop Down Menu [CDDM] will soon be in this spot.]
  1. Douglas Porter [& University of Qld] FRAUD on Disabled Old Man to BULLY him
  2. How Nazi BULLY of Disabled old man, ex librarian Janine Schmidt "repaid".
  3. Read how BCC bully Councillor Judy Magub "repaid" for assisting to defraud disabled old man.
  4. The University of Queensland is fully liable for the Fraud of ex Registrar Douglas Porter.
  5. The Clandestine method used by Douglas Porter to defraud the disabled old man.
  6. Means that Anglican Church Fraudster Priest Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan used to defraud the disabled old man.
  7. Rev John Morgan's Fraud he called Australian Institute of Ethics and the Professions
  8. The way that the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church assisted the Fraud of the disabled old man or BIG PROFITS!
  9. Douglas Porter is the Chairman of the UQ council called St Johns College Council that Runs St Johns College.
  10. The real lowdown on St Johns College at The University of Queensland, and is part of the Australian Public Sector [Government].
  11. How Lawyer Stephen Tonge, a UQ hanger on, profited by assisting the fraud of the disable old man.
  12. Korske Ara Amrita   ISSN: 1834-6340   [What is Korske Ara Amrita?] 
  13. Louise Kitchen Amrita   ISSN:  1834-643X   [What is Louise Kitchen Amrita?]
  14. The Magistrate whose conduct in Court was described buy the Qld Court of Appeal as Topsy-Turvy "Sentence First - Verdict afterwards".
  15. How Magistrate PaulM Kluck Denies a Fair Hearing & DueProcess by denying Accommodation of the Disabled old man's Special Needs
  16. No Jurisdiction: Lies, Fraud, Hot Potato-Get Rid of It
  17. Shane Hunter, the CDPP lawyer uses an abuse of court process to bully a disabled old man.
  18. The way that Tony Roser, Registrar of Courts, at the Brisbane Magistrates Court thinks he can bully the disabled old man.
  19. How Magistrates Courts' incompetent Tape recorder operator, Nikki Parisi, has tickets on herself and stuffs up.
  20. The Multiple ways Police/cop Armed Robber Henri Elias Rantala assisted the defrauding of the Disabled Old Man.
  21. The  ways Police/cop Armed Robber Monica Antony assisted the defrauding of the Disabled Old Man.
  22. The WIDESPREAD fraud & corruption, across Australia, of the rspca taking advantage of the public sector corruption across Australia.
  23. The FRAUD & CORRUPTION of Maree Fell and co of the Society of St Vincent de Paul, in Cairns as they lied and cheated to close down Vinnies' Gym and steal all Gym equipment belonging to Jim Tierney.
  24. Expose of ex Dean of Law at UQ, Geoffrey deQ Walker as he set out to cheat disabled old man to please his corrupt colleagues.
  25. Expose of how UQ Deputy Vice-Chancellor Ted Brown Conspired with Douglas Porter, and ex Dean of Law at UQ, Geoffrey deQ Walker to cheat disabled Old man.
  26. The fraud, perjury, lies and cheating of the Disabled Old Man by ex Coles Manager Linda Maree Wease.
  27. The many levels of corruption in the Queensland Police:
  28. Police/copper Brendan Read defrauds disabled old man & Signs Oath of facts of which he has no knowledge.
  29. Accountants KPMG wanted ex cop Brendan Read who deposed to false oath, to defraud clients of KPMG.
  30. Brisbane City Council concoct RUSE  to try to justify Armed Robbery For University of Queensland & Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church.
  31. Campbell Newman happy to conceal the fraud and Armed Robbery of disabled old many by BCC.
  32. Australia's Governor-General's connection to, and knowledge of, FRAUD in the Courts in Qld
  33. When a barrister, Chief Judge of the Qld District Court Patsy Mary Wolfe Abrogated her Paramount Duty To the Court and so Defrauds Disabled old man.
  34. For Years Qld's Translink cheat the Disabled Old Man by banning his Assistance dogs.
  35. Peter Strachan, Translink CEO is the Incompetent Public Sector Parasite Discriminates against the Disabled & reclusive Old Man.
  36. Are Margaret White, Patsy Mary Wolfe & Quentin Bryce previously of UQ_Law Faculty a Corrupt Tyranny Trio due  Fraud & Fraud On Courts?
  37. BEWARE of UQ Sports Ltd as Chairman, Douglas Porter is a Criminal & Fraudster. He is not a fit & proper person to be a company director.
  38. You decide.  Is Susan Barker of the Queensland Office of Information Commissioner, Incompetent or a Fraud?
  39. Valuable Information about the Queensland Office of the Information Commissioner.
  40. Is John Briton,  the Legal Services Commissioner for Queensland, Incompetent or a Fraud?  He stated in writing, the contrary of a basic legal principle.
  41. Valuable Information about the Queensland Legal Services Commission.
  42. Valuable Information about the Queensland Crime & Misconduct Commission.
PHPincludesPlagiocephaly/includedSeeMenuNewPlagiocephalyLinks.php

SEE:  Overview of multiple criminal frauds of me by Douglas Porter & The University of Queensland:

includedSummaryCaseFraudPoliceAndCDPP.php

Summary of the case by the Criminal, corrupt & FRAUDULENT Qld police AGAINST Disabled Old Man

This is the case where corrupt police and a corrupt Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, attempt to use brute force, of police arrest and harassment to silence the disabled old man, to conceal how the Queensland police performed an Armed Robbery on him to Assist the Queensland Government defraud the disabled old man of his house and land that he owned and which was his home.

The disabled old man has brain damage caused by severe head injury when a teenager.  That affects his ability to "work" for any but short time periods.  He is able to concentrate for only short periods. This is near impossible for a casual observer to notice.  He quickly becomes fatigued and if he is forced to continue to try to concentrate, that results in mental exhaustion.  On the first day of hearing, knowing the disabled old man's disability and the nature of it, Magistrate Klutz ridiculed the disabled old man, even though the disabled old man was trying hard to accommodate what the Magistrate desired.   CLEARLY, THE DISABLED OLD MAN MUST REFUSE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS, UNLESS AND UNTIL HIS SPECIAL NEEDS CONSEQUENT UPON HIS DISABILITIES ARE FULLY ACCOMMODATED.   THIS IS ESSENTIAL IF HE IS TO RECEIVE DUE PROCESS.  THE ONUS IS UPON THE MAGISTRATE, JUDGE AND DECISION MAKER, TO ENSURE THAT THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS EXTENDED DUE PROCESS aka NATURAL JUSTICE.

THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS HAPPY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS PROVIDED HE RECEIVES DUE PROCESS. 

The real crux of this fraud upon the disabled old man and concurrently, UPON THE JUSTICE AND LEGAL SYSTEM OF QUEENSLAND AND AUSTRALIA, is that this disabled old man is being prosecuted in the most contemptuous way, to continue the EXPLOITATION OF HIS BEING DISABLED BY THE QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT, in that the Queensland Government, defrauded/stole from the disabled old man, the house and land that he owned that was his home, for the use of and by The University of Queensland.  The clandestine fraud was orchestrated by the Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  The fraud involved an ARMED ROBBERY of the disabled old man by Queensland Police in company with a Queensland government Authority, for the benefit of another Queensland Government authority viz, The University of Queensland. The case involved a fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man. The same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala also charged the disabled old man with other charges to favour The University of Queensland, who had been defrauding the disabled old man for years.  ..

Instead of the Australian government doing as it should to honour its International Commitments [
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]] to rail against exploitation of disabled persons, it is actually perpetuating, ITSELF, the exploitation of this disabled old man, because no doubt, the exploitation of the disabled old man was by the Queensland Government, and a number of parts of the Queensland Government in collusion.

This fraud of the disabled old man was orchestrated by Queensland Public Sector Parasite, Douglas Porter, when he was Registrar of The University of Queensland, for the benefit of The University of Queensland and to punish the disabled old man for standing up for his rights as a Disabled person, while at The University of Queensland.  Involved in the Porter perpetrated fraud was an ARMED ROBBERY by the Queensland Government being the Queensland police in particular corrupt cops Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony, of the disabled old man at his home together with a concurrent fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man by the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala.

The law confirms that the Armed Robbery by Henri EliasRantala and Monica Louise Antony, was actually a CRIMINAL
armed robbery. The factual evidence is also online.  The conduct constituting the armed robbery was not just accidental.   The perpetrators of the fraud, Queensland Public Sector parasites, set out to create what they expected would be an arguable case TO JUSTIFY THE "ARMED ROBBERY" as just part of their normal operations.    They created a RUSE for just that reasonHowever, the silly bitch lawyer Joanne Whiting, did not know what she was doing, so clearly the Ruse was hatched by one of her superiors.

That fact then begs the question of the purpose of that
RUSE and armed robbery, and exposes the perpetrators of the defrauding of the disabled old man of his home.  Because the Queensland Government perpetrated the fraud of the disabled old man of his home, his house and land, the Queensland government wants it concealed.  Therefore, the conduct of prosecuting the disabled old man is criminal and makes the perpetrated an accessory to the fraud.  The evidence giving those prosecuting the disabled old man a "guilty mind" is all that evidence on that webpage.  Those involved now in "prosecuting" the disabled old man  are criminal. 

While the corrupt parasite Shane Hunter, a prosecutor from the Commonwealth DPP, had the knowledge that the corrupt police Rantala and Antony did commit an armed robbery, he cannot be prosecuted as he has "advocates' immunity".  However, none of the others involved in the process of prosecuting the Disabled Old Man have immunity.  Corrupt ex-cop [now 'working' for KPMG] Brendan Scott Read had put another "prosecutor" from the CDPP right into the frame, by admitting they colluded to bring the false charges against the disabled old man, but that prosecutor was not an advocate in this matter, so does not have
advocates' immunity.  That other parasite from the CDPP is named Anthony Gett.  Corrupt ex-cop Brendan Scott Read also does not have immunity from prosecution for being an accessory to the Armed Robbery and to the defrauding the disabled old man of his house and land, worth in the order of $1million.  Of course, we will be assisting the disabled old man to gain many more similar house and land properties in the area from the Fraudsters.  This will include the house of the defrauding lawyer who did the transfer of the title with full knowledge of the fraud.  His name is Stephen Tonge.  The Queensland Government, both the Queensland Public Sector university, The University of Queensland, and the Queensland Government of Anna Bligh proper,  will be up for the majority of the damages.  This all arose because the disabled old man IS disabled.  It was thought by the public sector parasites, with UQ Registrar Douglas Porter, as the lead criminal in the box seat driving the fraud of the disabled old man, that the disabled old man was ripe for exploitation, because he is permanently disabled.  Now, the Commonwealth of Australia, in the person of the corrupt Commonwealth DPP prosecutor Shane R. Hunter, has joined the fray exploiting the disabled old man.  This in in stark contravention of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The parasitic Federal labor government acceded to the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities  on 21st August, 2009.

Because all the police involved in the prosecution of the disabled old man, are presumed to know the detail of the evidence proving the armed robbery because the evidence and legal reason is in the Public Domain, online and it would be reasonable to presume that police would check its validity, and we know the evidence is 100% genuine, then all the police including the police solicitor Paxton Booth are put in the frame by the evidence of Brendan Scott Read.  The other police aware of the criminal conduct in which they were engaged included  Detective Sergeant Steven Bignall, Detective Senior Constables Gavin Hackett and Detective Senior Constable Dave Graham.  Each of these has been engaged in a criminal activity.  This amounts to 

Because parasitic fraudster Shane Hunter of the CDPP was prepared to prosecute these charges, when he knew the evidence proved that police Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony committed an Armed Robbery, suggests that he expected a win, meaning that he knew the Magistrates Court, and possibly the District Court are corrupt, like as displayed, maybe by Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and District Court Judge Leanne Clare.  that .d ..


This case now has a high profile International dimension.  Australia has ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD].  Importantly, the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia has, on 21st August, 2009 acceded to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [OP].  As shyster Shane Hunter is a Commonwealth Public Servant within the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, a Commonwealth Agency, a part of the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, he and it are subject to the OP.  As the disabled old man has already suffered extensive discrimination, and fraud, at the hands of Shyster Shane Hunter, breach of the CRPD has already occurred and hence, pursuant to the OP, formal complaint can be made to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Geneva, Switzerland, once all domestic Australian remedies have been exhausted, or effectively exhausted.

The summary for each day will be a Menu of the anchors [or markers/tags] placed in the Transcript of this day.  It will be effectively a Summary of the discussion between the Magistrate Paul M Kluck [the Klutz] and Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, [who knows the evidence that  proves the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala did in fact commit an armed robbery because no-one had authority to enter exclusively possessed land, on that occasion; they needed a court order but did not have one].  The disabled old man did not appear in the committal hearing coram Kluck, after 28th June, as he had become ill from the constant barrage of harassment and jibes aimed at his disabilities, and attacks upon his weaknesses caused by his disabilities, from the Magistrate Kluck the Klutz and from the Commonwealth Government lawyer fraudster Shane Hunter.  Of course, neither need worry as Magistrate Klutz has Judicial Immunity and shyster Shane Hunter who knows he is assisting a crime perpetrated by the Government against a disabled citizen, including EXPLOITATION of the DISABLED, to remain concealed, has Advocates' Immunity.  In Kluck's court, Due Process was abrogated, because the disabled old man had Special Needs that were not accommodated by Paul M Kluck. Hence, from that moment, Kluck's court became a nullity. Thus, from then, the disabled old man was denied Due Process.  Read on the transcript, how Magistrate Kluck ridiculed the disabled old man.

At the time of committing the Armed Robbery of the disabled old man, Henri Elias Rantala illegally arrested the disabled old man so as to keep him from his home while his home was ransacked and his yard was cleared of all of his possession to order of the Queensland Government, who wished to take control of his property in quick time, for The University of Queensland to use.  This was orchestrated by the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  Well, on 20th July, 2010, 22 days after the last day that the disabled old man tried to perform in the committal hearing, on 28th June, 2010, the Queensland Court of Appeal gave it decision regarding that illegal arrest on that day of the disabled old man by parasite cop Rantala.  In clear dicta the Court of Appeal raised the spectre of the gross criminality involved in the whole matter

This day's transcript is one continuous file/page.  These anchors when listed will be listed in sequence.
The three days when witnesses have actually given evidence have been similarly summarised with "anchors" [aka markers/tags], and each appears thus:
  1. Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  2. Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  3. Day 3: 28th June, 2010
This case has international consequences, as this action by the Commonwealth Prosecutor, given that the disabled old man has been thrown out of his home by a corrupt judicial system of the magistrates and District Courts, is a disgusting reflection upon the judicial principle of Due Process, for any country in the world. This will make Australia the laughing stock of the international justice community.  So much more so as all this has been done with the full knowledge of the Australian Attorney General, Robert McClelland.


See **** The EVIDENCE **** that ex-police cop parasite Peter Dutton, Liberal Party Federal MP for Dickson, tried, but failed, to close down our website disclosing labor ELECTORAL FRAUD, using corrupt Qld cops.

  Australian Federal Court Judge Jeffrey Spender is criminal scum. See the EVIDENCE

BREAKTHROUGH in Daniel Morcombe case.
We
SCOOPED Channel 7, TV & EXPOSED POLICE CORRUPTION.

See the photo PROOF
 E-Contact us to tell us what you think:

This website is part of the web-presence of

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA

View list of SOME of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html

SEE WHAT I PLAN TO DO ABOUT IT!

Image

CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE


Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA

View list of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html

See our LATEST TOPICS:

HOT NEWS: HARD EVIDENCE:  Joe Hockey & FASCIST CRIMINAL congress

I have been bullied my whole life.  See the reason.  That means that I have had fights my whole life.  You can realize the I detest bullies; that is, bullies that are personal to me, politically domestically which includes corrupt polticians, judges and ,MAGISTRATES  & MAGISTRATESmagistrates, more magistrates, lawyers, lawyers, and police, police, and other public sector parasites, plus, politically INTERNATIONALLY.

20041129 more reduced and cropped photo police Rantala.jpgDCP_0517_Big_Big_Big_A_Constable_Antony.jpg

















 CORRUPT ARMED ROBBER [with violence] Henri Elias Rantala. 

[see NEW Website on Henri Rantala]  

"PPheeeeew , that is HUUUUGE", he whispered.

Monica Antony [BigA for Antony]

Corrupt Cops  [talk about being the BUTT of humour]   'Does Swine flu [flew] have anything to do with the POLICE AIR WING? '  and who said, 'PIGS WILL FLY'.

SEE WHAT I PLAN TO DO ABOUT IT!

My Qualifications

       Bachelor of Commerce [BCom] [The University of Queensland] - 1978
       Bachelor of Science [BSc] [The University of Queensland]
- 1997
       Bachelor of Laws [LLB]
[The University of Queensland] - 2003
       Bachelor of Arts [BA]
[The University of Queensland] - 2003


   Police Constable Henri Elias Rantala aka 'Minge'  aka 'Dummy'  
20041129 more reduced and
            cropped photo police Rantala.jpg About this parasite , Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, now groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queensland police and Queensland government.
Rantala is a rare case within the Queensland Police Service [QPS] in that he he was "groomed" and "fast tracked" to continue the fraud, corruption and bribery that is the QPS within the wholesale corruption that is the Queensland labor Government.  [One major way to reduce this is the restoration of the Upper House  to the Queensland Parliament, the Legislative Council, as a democratically elected house.  It was abolished by the Queensland labor government in 1922.]  Rantala was groomed to be a police prosecutor, which is one position where police can be particularly corrupt.  As Prosecutors, they had Advocates Immunity.  I have been able to have this parasite under oath in the witness box subject to my cross examination.   In his evidence in chief at "Call Henri Elias Rantala" he produced a litany of lies.   My cross examination of him, and his replies thereto, at My Cross-Examination Of Corrupt Police Parasite Henri Elias Rantala,  are most instructive.  Considering all the subsequent events in the attempted corrupt cover-up of this gross crime of Armed Robbery by the Queensland Government, the extended period of planning activity that went into the perpetration of this Armed Robbery, and the fact that Rantala Left Indooroopilly Station from which he launched this Armed Robbery, targeting me, soon after in January2005, it appears Rantala was in integral part of this armed Robbery targeting me.  Just a few days prior, Douglas Porter, the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, for whom, as its Rep, Porter was orchestrating this Armed Robbery as a step towards stealing my beneficial ownership of my home, house and land, caused an attack on me and then called the police to me, and Rantala appeared..

 I will build in this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form.  This caption will accompany the image of Henri Elias Rantala where ever it appears on our websites.  It will be progressively added to all previous representations of his photo.
We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this parasite .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queensland police and Queensland government.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queensland police and Queensland government. 



   Police Constable Monica Louise Antony aka 'Big A for Antony' 

DCP_0517-Big_Big Big A
            Constable Antony.jpg
We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this twit brainwashed with a bidet .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Corrupt cop Monica Louise Antony aka BigA for Antony, SUPER DUMB FEMALE Just consider her answers in my cross-examination of her, now that the police hierarchy has shuffled her out of the way, so she can do no harm to police corruption by her inability to lie convincingly.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Corrupt cop Monica Louise Antony aka BigA for Antony, SUPER DUMB FEMALE Just consider her answers in my cross-examination of her, now that the police hierarchy has shuffled her out of the way, so she can do no harm to police corruption by her inability to lie convincingly. 


../CorruptMagistratesMenu.php ../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php