HAIG    REPORT:    GoTo [on this page] HaigReport's Menu Of Themes of Menus for our thousands of pages
TIPS for
Navigating HaigReport:  If you arrived at this page, referred from a Search Engine such as Google et al, your URL link will NOT have an #Anchor/Marker to take you to the relevant spot on this page.  In that case, we do recommend that you view our "Latest HaigReport Promotions" of recent additions to our websites, by Clicking Here.  It will open in a new Browser window. 

If
you Click Here, you will be taken, usually, to the specific Unique Content on this page, for which you were most likely seeking.  However, if you Click Here, you will be taken to the Top of the HaigReport Header, below on this page. 

However, if you have arrived at this page from another of our Website pages, your link will usually have an #Anchor, also called a marker, which will take you to the intended specific spot on the page where that marker is positioned.  In fact, it will probably take you there prior to your reading this.  Moving to that Anchor is the final step in the loading of this page.

 HAIG     REPORT:   Is now on  twitter  [from 2nd June, 2013]  link to us HERE on twitter     See our Twitter Strategy    

 HAIG    REPORT:  SEE: Russell Mathews' COMMENTARY:    Russell Mathews' [BCom BSc LLB & BA] current TOPICAL commentary on GOVERNMENT, politics & business     Press to READ       Press for MENU   

 HAIG    REPORT:    WANTED:
Healthy female "dog" to breed with Parson Russell Terrier, to produce ASSISTANCE DOGS.   Rochedale South QLD 4123
I wish to breed from my Parson Russell Terrier. He is a trained assistance dog. He has a wonderful nature. The breed of his mate could be varied or a cross; eg Parson Russell Terrier, Jack Russell Terrier, Beagle, Bull Terrier, Bull mastiff, Staffy, and/or Fox Terrier plus many others. She does not need to be "pedigreed". I am very protective of my dogs. She will become very valuable to me and become one of my assistance "dogs". If we can assist each other, please contact me on my contact form, including your email address and your landline phone number so I can phone you to discuss. 

Because I am disabled and have an LLB [so therefore understand the Law surrounding disabilities and assistance dogs] I am now branching out to providing Assistance dogs to disabled persons [even if disabled in only a minor way and so not even realizing it]. This is not a business proposition but rather just a very necessary service I can offer to the community.
Many people have a disability and do not realize their ailment or "problem" is by law, the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA], classified as a "disability". This is especially so for people getting on in years, and who have a dog, and are maybe moving to accommodation where they are told they cannot take their dog. In a majority of cases, those people cannot be legally forced to surrender their animal/dog.
I will be assisting those person who already have dogs, but are being forced, unlawfully, to dispose of them because maybe they are moving accommodation. I can train your existing dogs to be assistance dogs and provide the documentation as required by the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA]. I do not intend to charge for this, but just maybe cover some marginal costs.

    View the Latest    HAIG     REPORT Promotions:  in this Scrolling Window, or OPEN in new browser:     

 Click here  to Learn how your Personalized Alert Notice [IMMEDIATELY ABOVE] is prepared by our HAIG Unique Visitor Algorithm: [HUVA] or  Click here  to see your UNIQUE Personalized Alert Notice in a new Browser Window.


 Submission & Appearance to District Court 24th August, 2012 Motion Permanent Stay Qualified Privilege Social Moral Duty Expose Australian Corruption in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:


My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies. The HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies.

   It is Our legal, social and moral DUTY to EXPOSE CRIME, FRAUD & CORRUPTION plus Lying and Hypocrisy in Public Life, Including Judges & magistrates 
 

Fraud, Corruption & attempted  MURDER 
covered-up by Queensland police, EXPOSED 

header: Qld District Court coram Kerry O'Brien:

Qld District Court coram Kerry O'Brien: 
Australian Government Steals Disabled Old Man's home for The University of Queensland to punish Disabled Old Man for being DISABLED & wants Court's sanction.

commonheader.php

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.  
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      EMAIL us anytime:  Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay. 

considerevidence.php

Consider the evidence! Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay.  

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Submission & Appearance to District Court 24th August, 2012 Motion Permanent Stay Qualified Privilege Social Moral Duty Expose Australian Corruption in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE

See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for Chief Justice Paul deJersey _v_ Court of Appeal President Margaret McMurdo; Judicial War Supreme Court of Qld

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for Corrupt Qld Judiciary: Favours Untouchable Banks FRAUD; What is Chief Justice of Supreme Court of Qld, Paul deJersey doing?

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for Woolworths/BigW: The Experience by a disabled customer, of Woolworth's BULLYING & BigW's MISLEADING & DECEPTIVE CONDUCT

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Submission & Appearance to District Court 24th August, 2012 Motion Permanent Stay Qualified Privilege Social Moral Duty Expose Australian Corruption in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE

 Content: Submission & Appearance to District Court 24th August, 2012 Motion Permanent Stay Qualified Privilege Social Moral Duty Expose Australian Corruption in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
PHPincludesDistrictCourtKerryOBrien/included20120824SubmissionDistrictCourtMention.php G'day DCJ handling the matter of the purported Section 20B Crimes Act 1914 referral.

The relevant mention is on the morning of the 24th August, 2012.  I shall forward the final version of this as an HTML email [and as a pdf attachment], to the Court Registry, Shane Hunter of the CDPP [Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions] and to the Commonwealth Attorney General Nicola Roxon, on the evening of 23th August, 2012. 

I intend that this will highlight the parasites [a word used for its true logical meaning], who have chosen to exploit me, a reclusive Disabled Old Man.  


Many organs of Government both Queensland and Australian, have perpetuated the Judicial Fraud in and preceding 1992.  The 
JUDICIAL FRAUD by many including Quentin Bryce, when she was the Qld director of HREOC, the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [HREOC] itself, Patsy Mary Wolfe as counsel for HREOC, Federal Court Judges Jeffrey Spender and Douglas Drummond, Clare Endicott, Town Agent for HREOC, and Fran Douglas of the Qld Crown Law Office and cousin of Justice James S Douglas [who attended Villanova College, Coorparoo (1967)] and the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [HREOC], was perpetrated as I was known widely to be disabled and thus an easy mark, and an easy scalp to be used by both [the close personal friends from their time as both lecturers in the Law School at The University of Queensland[, Quentin Alice Louise Bryce and Patsy Mary Wolfe [together with third "close personal friend" Margaret White, Judge of the Qld Court of Appeal], to "justify" the "substance of their stature" and thus promotions.  Both have been promoted by the same Corrupt labor government, as has the third "close personal friend" Margaret White, Judge of the Qld Court of Appeal.

All these same parasites, including Quentin Bryce, the Qld director of HREOC, the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [HREOC], Patsy Mary Wolfe as counsel for HREOC, Federal Court Judges Jeffrey Spender and Douglas Drummond, Clare Endicott, Town Agent for HREOC, and Fran Douglas of the Qld Crown Law Office and cousin of Justice James S Douglas [who attended Villanova College, Coorparoo (1967)] and the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [HREOC], stood to gain great benefit by SILENCING ME.  If the ATTEMPTED MURDER of myself in my home on 14th January, 1996, had been effective, many would have gained as I could not be raising this matter now.   The  ATTEMPTED MURDER occurred after I have been campaigning about this JUDICIAL FRAUD by many including Quentin Bryce, who was then the Qld director of HREOC, the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [HREOC], Patsy Mary Wolfe as counsel for HREOC, Federal Court Judges Jeffrey Spender and Douglas Drummond, Clare Endicott, Town Agent for HREOC, and Fran Douglas of the Qld Crown Law Office and cousin of Justice James S Douglas [who attended Villanova College, Coorparoo (1967)] and the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [HREOC].

The corrupt Qld police of the same corrupt labor government that promoted Quentin Bryce and Patsy Wolfe, [and Margaret White JA],  were engaged in concealing and covering up the Attempted MURDER to which I had been subjected.

Because I had not been silenced by the attempted MURDER, the corrupt Qld police and corrupt labor government of Qld, continued to weaken me to effectively silence me.   As a preliminary step to steal my home that was the house and land I owned as beneficiary of a Constructive Trust, the fraud by Armed Robbery that has been perpetrated against me.  This matter of the 20B referral is piggy-backing upon the four charges that is one more instance of perpetuation, and so is yet again another instance of perpetuation of the fraud and Exploitation of a Disabled Old Man. 

The four charges preferred by the corrupt Qld Police and prosecuted, in the face of Qualified Privilege, by CDPP's Shane Hunter and Attorney-General of the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, are the latest attempt to complete the silencing of me that the attempted MURDER failed to achieve.

I require that this, my submission and 'appearance' in court for this mention, be included On the Record.  I am not in court today due to my disability.  This is my statement to the court on this occasion of this mention. It will be Disability Discrimination if that inclusion does not occur. While the Court has Judicial Immunity, Shane Hunter and the CDPP are part of the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, as is Attorney-General, Nicola Roxon, and all are subject to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol.  As Shane Hunter and the CDPP have attempted to use, in the past,  the defence disqualified by the Nuremberg Nazi trials, where that defence was used by the Nazis in Nuremberg to excuse the Nazi Holocaust; of not being able to think for themselves [public servants(?)], but having acted as automatons, they, Shane Hunter and all Members of the Executive of the Government of Australia,  should refuse to continue in this hearing/mention, if I am about to suffer Disability Discrimination.  [They should have refused to continue in the all previous hearings/mentions when I was being denied my Human Rights by virtue of my disabilities.]

Patsy Mary Wolfe is clearly becoming very concerned at the manner in which this matter is progressing.  Since she displayed such on 15th June, 2012, consideration of Public Crime within Australia has intensified as international attention has been drawn to the BAD FAITH, and IMPROPER MOTIVATION of the Australian Government by the statement by the Ecuadorian Government and the Actions of the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia in the Julian Assange Political Asylum matter.  Quentin Bryce is now the Governor-General of Australia.   She used my scalp to prove she was "worthy" [to a corrupt labor government], to be so promoted.  Patsy Wolfe will be feeling extremely disconcerted.

I move the same matters of Judges disqualifying themselves as I moved on my previous submission on 31 July, 2012.   I add in respect of my request that DCJA Kerry John O'Brien of the should disqualify himself: The conduct of  DCJA Kerry John O'Brien on the occasion of that mention on  31 July, 2012 as specified following the CDPP email content specified below.

I have repeatedly asked that the District Court order that a transcript be provided to me in a timely fashion.  I have still not received a copy of the transcript, of the 31 July, 2012 as at 20th August, 2012.  So
I effectively move from the Bar Table, given that I am disabled and that this procedure is a Reasonable adjustment to alleviate the effects of my disability, [in fact it is the preferred option by many courts to decide matters "on the papers"], that this District Court should find and order: that the court make an order that I am to receive a transcript of the mention proceedings, in a timely fashion.

I have received an email communique from the CDPP advising:

DPP Brisbane DPP.Brisbane@cdpp.gov.au
Aug 1
to me
Dear Mr Mathews,

The matter of the referral pursuant to s.20B of the Crimes Act was mentioned yesterday morning (31 July) in the District Court at Brisbane before His Honour Judge O’Brien.  Your submission, forwarded to the Court and the CDPP as an e-mail dated “Monday, 30 July 2012 1:00 PM” was accepted by His Honour as your appearance on the mention.

During the course of the mention, His Honour considered your submission he disqualify himself, and rejected that submission.  His Honour also rejected your submission that it was for the Court to conduct the voir dire you described and ruled, in effect,  that if it was your submission that special arrangements should be made for the conduct of any hearing in which you were involved,  it was a matter for you to particularize those arrangements and request that they be implemented.  An interim review mention date was listed for Friday 24 August 2012 for that purpose.

His Honour confirmed that the trial of the issue of your fitness to be tried would remain listed to commence on 12 November 2012 with a pre-trial review on 2 November 2012.

Yours faithfully

CDPP

**************

It would appear that His Honour did not read my submission on the 31st July, 2012, or alternatively did not understand what I believe is the simple proposition developed therein.   Determination of Special Arrangement to Accommodate Special Needs of a Disabled Person requires Expert knowledge of the particular detriments of the disabilities,  further expert knowledge to know the Special Needs that will arise, or likely to arise, or possibly likely to arise, from those particular detriments of the disabilities, and yet further expert knowledge in the Nature of the speciality of an Occupational Therapist to determine the Special Arrangements, aka Special  Measures aka Special Adjustments that are necessary to Accommodate those Special Needs.  I am not any of those experts.  I know I have many disabilities. I do not have to be an expert to know that.  As a direct consequence of my disabilities, I will require Special Arrangements, but I do not know any of the detail as I am not an expert.   His Honour seems destined to ensure that the proceeding will be an ad hoc affair, such that I do not have a Fair Hearing, or that a Fair Hearing is not ensured, or that at the least, no-one can  know that I have been afforded a Fair Hearing and Due Process.  This raises to the extent necessary that His Honour possesses a Reasonable Apprehension of Bias towards me.

To order as His Honour did, would seem to suggest he wishes to deny me a Fair Hearing, or not ensure that it will be a Fair Hearing or at least not be clear that I was receiving a fair hearing and Natural Justice/ Due Process.

I effectively move from the Bar Table, given that I am disabled and that this procedure is a Reasonable adjustment to alleviate the effects of my disability, [in fact it is the preferred option by many courts to decide matters "on the papers"], that this District Court should find and order:

These proceedings be stayed permanently as a matter of Privilege.   This 20B referral is necessarily consequent upon four charges in relation to the publication of four PUBLIC WEBSITES, namely, HaigReport.com, Austlawpublish.com, SelfHelpJustice.com, and expolicepeterparasiteduttonliberalhelppolicelaborelectoralfraud.info, which websites an aspect  of PUBLIC MEDIA, with a
DUTY to EXPOSE CRIME, FRAUD & CORRUPTION plus Lying and Hypocrisy in Public Life .  Qualified Privilege is an immunity protecting not only the website but also all persons involved in writing and producing the content of those websites.  As indicated in the cases mentioned below, with regard to Newspapers, the Editor is not required to indicate the identity of the Authors of any articles published.  Hence, the authors are not liable.  The same principle applies here.

Privilege is a "preliminary matter" and must be considered prior to any proceedings.  

For this motion the only evidence that needs to be considered are the exhibits introduced by the prosecution  at first instance in support of the charges.  It is then a matter of simply applying the relevant law to that evidence.  All courts, police, government commissions such as the CMC, LSC and OIC [all as detailed below], prosecution, magistrates and judges have been loathe to do this.  This begs the question of their reason.  Is the reason that I have been set up by police and commissions because I am disabled and vulnerable?

As these websites are public media, they attract "Qualified Privilege".  Any actions  necessarily involved in that publication is similarly protected and so too persons performing those actions.  If I had uploaded that content, I would be protected by this Qualified Privilege.  If I had not uploaded this content, I would not be guilty,  There is no alternative.  Hence, the charges are defective.

There is no doubt that I am the specific subject of much of the material on these websites.  This case, the four basis charges is an important case nationally and Internationally on the area of Freedom of Speech, and Human Rights of the Disabled.  As I am invoking the
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD], this matter my surface in Geneva.  

Qualified privilege is an immunity from lawsuit, usually a lawsuit for defamation, but not only defamation.  It is not merely a defence.  Hence it is a matter for preliminary consideration.

Qualified Privilege originated as a Common law Matter and still is Common Law, as well as being  a legislated defence to many prosecutions.  

The General Subject Matter of these websites is Exposure of Crime, Fraud and Corruption, and the Exposure of Lying and Hypocrisy in Public Life as well as Crime, and acts in the nature of crime, in Public Life that, in some cases, would be crimes but for some immunity such as Judicial Immunity or Advocates Immunity.

I now cite cases:

The Seminal cases:

COMMON LAW Qualified Privilege - THE CLEGG CASE   &
ALBERT REYNOLDS vs SUNDAY TIMES  and importantly the  10 POINT TEST  in  
THE REYNOLDS CASE.

1. The seriousness of the allegation – the more serious the allegation, the more protection will be applied. Trivial allegations which are merely embarrassing would probably not enjoy the protection. Allegations about purely private matters would probably not enjoy protection.

The allegations, the subject of the four charges which are the basis of this referral to the District Court, are that the police Officers Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony committed an armed Robbery, because by the concept of Common Purpose, they, while armed, and in company and without the Court Order as requiree by the then current on 29th November, 2004, Sect 160 of the Health Act 1937, which was the act by which entry was purported to be required, forced entry to my exclusively possessed property  so possession of mine on my property could be stolen.  The other persons in the Common Purpose were Brisbane City Council personnel, very much in Public Life.

2. The  nature of the information and the extent to which the subject matter is a matter of public concern. This follows from schedules I or II of 1996 act - essentially anything related to matters that would be discussed in forums listed in schedule I (ie the discussion of politics, or the content and conduct of trials) would be protected and almost certainly matters that would come up in forums detailed in schedule II would also be covered. Again, allegations of a private nature are excluded (except in so far as they might impact on performance of public or official duties). NB Discussion of what goes on in companies would have more coverage if it is a floated public company with shareholders, or if it was significant in the economy as a whole.

Police officers, and Brisbane City Council personnel are public officers who could do likewise to any citizen.  Hence, this Armed Robbery  is a matter of public concern.  

3 . The source of the information. The more authoritative the source, the more you are entitled to report their allegations, even if those allegations can not be proved or even if they turn out to be (to your surprise) incorrect. The test is – “would they have a reason to lie to me?”. So obviously chequebook journalism (where people are paid to make allegations) is not very safe, and would have less protection than allegations made by a responsible person with no axe to grind, and with a reputation for honesty. Also persons with a direct view of event or direct access to information are more to be believed (and therefore your report of what they say more protected) than second hand sources. Sources ‘on the record’ are more protected than anonymous sources. Two sources (or more) saying the same thing independently would of course be much stronger than a single source.

These events had occurred to me. I have an LLB and have an understanding of Law.  The sources of the information are documents of the Brisbane City Council including photographs.

4. The steps taken to verify the information. There must be a reasonable attempt in the time available (see below, point six urgency). The crucial thing is to try and put the allegations to the person being accused in order to get their side of the story. Obviously they will be evasive (especially if they have something to hide) and may give you the ‘run around’ in order to deny you protection under this very point in the ten point test. But you must either get to the person and make the allegation or, at the very least, be able to show a whole log of e-mails and phone calls where you make determined efforts to get their side of the story. A simple “they wouldn’t answer the phone” or “they were unavailable for comment” might not be good enough for this test (it was in fact where the daily Telegraph came unstuck in the Galloway case – see below).

5. The status of the information. You need to check that this is not an old allegation which has previously been denied. If the allegation had been previously dismissed by “an investigation which commands respect” then it would have no protection. For example if the allegation was about a doctor in a hospital. If the allegation had already been through some sort of internal enquiry at a hospital and had been dismissed, you may well lose your protection in repeating it, especially if you overlooked previous dismissal when you were trying to verify the information (see point 3 above – ‘steps taken to verify’).

6. The urgency of the matter. The judge recognised that news is “a perishable commodity” and that papers must compete to be first with the news. If the matter genuinely is urgent (eg to bring something like corruption to the attention of voters before polling day) then the other checks in the code might be less stringent and might still enjoy protection.

7. Whether comment was sought from the claimant – together with point 4 above and point 8 below, although the judge did say that putting allegations to the claimant was not necessary in every single case, if the case for protection on other counts was strong enough. As a practical point it is always wise to get the other side of the story and have them point out how or why the allegations might be untrue, then incorporate this in your report. Such a statement might also provide you with a ‘consent’ type defence to a libel action.

8. Whether the article contained the gist of the claimant’s side of the story (see above, points 4 and 7

9. The tone of the article. If the angle of a piece is along the lines of allegations of X have raised concerns… this would probably more protected than a straightforward assertion that the allegations are fact. It is always important to attribute the allegations to a named source (‘on the record’) if possible. If the source is not named there must be a genuine and obvious reason for this (eg they fear getting the sack, or being attacked). But with ‘protected sources’ and ‘off the record’ there is always the separate (and growing) legal danger of action for breach of confidence.

10. The circumstances of the publication, including the timing. The allegations should be brought to public attention as quickly as possible. They should not be ‘saved up’ for commercial motives by the paper or broadcaster. This is similar to the need to publish/broadcast quickly in ordinary Qualified Privilege of court and parliamentary reports.

Mohammed Abdul Latif Jameel vs Wall Street Journal (Feb 2005)

The paper thought it had reasonable grounds for airing allegations from what it believed to be a good source that a certain Saudi Arabian businessman was involved in financing terrorism. The report could not prove the allegation, but believed that she had a Reynolds “duty” to report that the allegations were being taken seriously by various important and responsible people. But the allegations could not be proved, and therefore not defended with “justification” so she relied on a Reynolds defence. In her own view (and the view of many commentators) she though she had stayed within the 10 point test. But Lord Phillips on appeal did not agree. The Wall Street Journal loses.

But the Wall Street Journal appealed.

Lawyers for the PPA note:

The Lords held that Reynolds had been interpreted too strictly in the past: the 10 criteria, including steps taken to verify the information and the tone of the article, were pointers as opposed to hurdles for the media.


The result of the Jameel case is that the media have much more freedom when reporting matters of public interest, where it may not be possible to subsequently prove the truth of the allegations, provided that they act reasonably and in the public interest.

There is no legal definition of 'the public interest' so rely on the definition given in the PCC code of conduct - the main points being


(1) exposing crime


(2) exposing health risk to the community


(3) exposing lying and hypocrisy in public life

What the PCC actually says about the public interest is lengthy. Here it is:

interest

There may be exceptions to the clauses marked * where they can be demonstrated to be in the public interest.

1. The public interest includes, but is not confined to:

i) Detecting or exposing crime or serious impropriety.

ii) Protecting public health and safety.

iii) Preventing the public from being misled by an action or statement of an individual or organisation.

2. There is a public interest in freedom of expression itself. [CH adds - this has the backing of the law, section 10 of the Human Rights Act]

3. Whenever the public interest is invoked, the PCC will require editors to demonstrate fully how the public interest was served.

4. The PCC will consider the extent to which material is already in the public domain, or will become so.

5. In cases involving children under 16, editors must demonstrate an exceptional public interest to over-ride the normally paramount interest of the child.


The aspects, some of which are listed below in a timeline of the improper actions of Queensland police, Queensland Government Commissions, Queensland courts and judges, Commonwealth Commissions and Commissioners, Federal Courts are all matters of clear public concern.

This timeline will show conclusively, the extent of the corruption in Queensland.   We detail here one major criminal plot with many subplots, perpetrated mainly by the Queensland Government and Queensland Government Authorities, Commissions and departments.   The Queensland Police were prominent  in committing an Armed Robbery, a major part of this criminal plot.  Senior Police including Superintendent Dale Pointon are ACCESSORIES  after the fact to the Armed Robbery and accessories to the OTHER crimes of Accessories after the fact to the many OTHER crimes since to "cover-up"/conceal the litany of CRIMINALITY. 

I know the law, as I have a Law Degree.   The criminals cannot make the Irrefutable conclusive evidence of crimes against me disappear, as much as they may continue to refuse to recognize the evidence, and refuse to consider it.   Hence, I will not give up until I have all these criminals penalized, my property returned to me, all wrongs against me corrected and many fold punitive damages awarded to me.

I have the advantage of not being stuffed around by corrupt lawyers, who have a paramount "duty" to the court.  I KNOW my rights and I DEMAND my rights.  

Corrupt Cop Henri Rantala,[in court, under Oath],Implicates Superintendent Dale Pointon in the CRIMINAL PLOT.

This now is a Statement by Corrupt Cop Henri Elias Rantala who was the lead cop committing the ARMED ROBBERY.  See the hyperlink where Rantala admitted to this in court under oath, confirming this.

"The offensive material has been
subsequently been maintained on the internet since that time until
the present day. I have been contacted by Superintendent Pointon,
Officers from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence
Branch, State Crime Operations Command, relatives all asking
question about the material from 2006 until the present
day."

[It has been transcribed for Google Ranking purposes.]
"The offensive material has been subsequently been maintained on the internet since that time until the present day.  I have been contacted by Superintendent Pointon, Officers from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, State Crime Operations Command, relatives all asking questions about the material from 2006 until the present day."

 Because in law, these statements are not EVIDENCE, and because we had the author, the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala in the witness box under oath [without our having to expend much effort to have him thus], we had him confirm that as "evidence under oath".
He did just thatCorrupt Cop Henri Rantala Implicates Superintendent Dale Pointon.  [We doubt if this has done much for the promotional prospects for this corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala.  From what we hear, it hasn't.]   This proves that Superintendent Pointon is corrupt.  Since his father, Laurie Pointon, was also a Senior Queensland cop, we wonder if the Pointon family is one of the CORRUPT POLICE FAMILIES indicated by respected Law academic Dr Christine Eastwood, wife of Southport Magistrate John Costanzo.  [See paragraph #5]

  
Rantala also Implicates Senior Officers From Ethical Standards Command, from Security Intelligence Branch, and from State Crime Operations Command 


http://haigreport.com/QldPoliceCorruption/QldPoliceCorruptionStatDecDrChristineEastwoodMagistrateJohnCostanzoRobertNeedhamHelenCouperCMC_PeterLindsayHansard25Nov2009.php#Statutory_Declaration

There is irrefutable conclusive evidence that the Brisbane City Council and the Queensland Government committed an armed robbery of me, as a step towards stealing my house and land that IS my home, from me.   Corrupt cop
Rantala Admits The Brisbane City Council Did Not Have a Court Order to enter my property.

The fact that the Queensland Police, various Queensland magistrates, Queensland Government Commissions, Queensland judges, and the Commonwealth of Australia Executive Government by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions [CDPP] engaged in episodes to cover-up and white wash the major armed robbery and fraud, shows conclusively that Queensland is utterly corrupt, and that this corruption extends to All of Australia by the actions of The Commonwealth of Australia Executive Government..

[We will continue to add to this timeline. Google et al will love that.  It will act as a summary of all the details of this criminal fraud and armed robbery of a disabled old man by the extensive corruption in the legal profession, police, courts and government commissions and Departments in Queensland, extending to the Commonwealth of Australia Executive government.]

Firstly, Some Pertinent Facts:

From 1991, I was studying at The University of Qld.   I moved into my property at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia in the precincts of The University of Queensland on 28th February, 1994.

Douglas Porter was the Registrar of The University of Queensland, and secretly, and so unbeknown to me, the Representative of The University of Queensland on St Johns College Council.  Importantly, Douglas Porter was also, for all relevant times [still is in 2012] the Chairman of St Johns College CouncilSt Johns College Council is a joint exercise between The University of Queensland and The Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC] aka the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane [CSDB].   St Johns College Council is the governing body of St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland.

I begin this Timeline/Chronology effectively with the Armed Robbery of me and much of my possessions, by the Queensland Government, with weapons supplied by the Queensland Police, on 29th November, 2004 and two further days immediately subsequent ie 30th November and 1st December, 2004, as the evidence is irrefutable, and conclusive, and is easily simple to understand.   This has not prevented many organs [for instance see Robert Walker, since made Commissioner of Body Corporates And Community Management] of the Queensland Government and of the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, engage in a CRIMINAL COVERUP & WHITEWASH, as I detail below. 

However, this was not the start of corruption and fraud against me by the Government of Queensland,  which can be traced back to 1974, and notorious corrupt labor & struck off lawyer Terence Joseph Mellifont - so the labor government made his wife, Julie Dick [but she is Julie Maree Mellifont on the electoral roll] a Judge of the District Court of Queensland] or earlier.  [Mellifont and Spender really cheated me when I was badly affected with brain damage].  Struck off ex-solicitor and clandestine SP bookie, with police protection, Terence Joseph Mellifont aka TJ Mellifont aka Terry Mellifont, who familiarized himself with the corrupt cops when a corrupt solicitor, ensured that I was marked as a target on the secret Queensland Police files.  There have been many incidents pointing to the fact that I was targeted by Queensland Police. 

13th September, 2004:

See the clandestine letter to the Brisbane City Council:

Hugh McVean the trustee aka Fiduciary and hence with a Fiduciary Duty, of the Constructive Trust of which my house was the corpus, and of which, I was the sole beneficiary with Beneficial Ownership, wrote in secret, a clandestine letter to the Brisbane City Council, asking them to keep it secret, and encouraging them to continue to pursue me. He indicated a CLANDESTINE CONSPIRACY  with Brisbane City Council against meHugh McVean advised the Brisbane City Council that I was disabled.  That meant that Hugh McVean knew that apart from the Constructive Trust, he also owed me a Fiduciary Duty because of my disability.  Hugh McVean was closely advised by a firm of corrupt Nambour lawyers; [but then most lawyers by far are corrupt].  On a previous occasion in a meeting chaired by the Residential Tenancy Authority, I advised all that it was not a Residential Tenancy and that Hugh McVean owed me a Fiduciary Duty.  He asked me how to spell "FIDUCIARY" as he wrote it down.  He would have asked his lawyers the meaning.  Anyway, in law a Fiduciary is deemed to know his Fiduciary Duty.  Not to so know is a "mistake of Law" and a "mistake of law" can never be an excuse for illegality.

19th October, 2004:

Even without the addition of weapons, clearly the Brisbane City Council were intent upon stealing my possessions from my yard so as to clear all my possessions from my yard for the speedy transfer of my property to The University of Queensland, St Johns College Council.  They knew they needed a court order but they did not want to argue the point or take the longer period of time to progress through the courts, because Douglas Porter, as Registrar of UQ and Chair of the St Johns College Council for UQ, wanted to use my house and land to accommodate Students in the 2005 Academic Year, as well as knowing that I had a PRIOR EQUITABLE RIGHT TO OWN MY PROPERTY.   They knew they could not simply break and enter.   They knew the law was clearThey needed a court order.  To corruptly circumvent the law, so as to have an "arguable case" if ever they were forced to it, the legal department of the Brisbane City Council, named the Brisbane City Legal Practice, decided to create an elaborate RUSE or ARTIFICE, but to do it with a degree of "secrecy" aka "Legal Professional Privilege".  The plan was hatched by David Askern, the Senior public sector parasite lawyer in Brisbane City Legal Practice.   This criminal fraud was perpetrated with the full knowledge and approval of David Askern. In fact, David Askern hatched the CRIMINAL PLAN to COMMIT ARMED ROBBERY.  We have more damaging evidence of illegality by David Askern.

They had corrupt barrister Wayne John Tolton, prepare an "opinion" which they could mis-interpret as permitting their unrestrained entry without a court order or my permission.  



25th November, 2004:

The Brisbane City Council wrote to me [received by me on Friday 26th November, 2004], advising that they intended entering my yard and removing my possessions without my permission. 
.

29th November, 2004:

The Brisbane City Council  [by Principal perpetrators BCC personnel Steve Beck, Owen Benvenuti and Paul Maxwell] with the ARMED ASSISTANCE of Queensland police personnel, Henri Elias Rantala, and  Monica Louise Antony [BigA for Antony] forced entry to my land where I had UNDISPUTED EXCLUSIVE LEGAL & EQUITABLE POSSESSION.

The facts of the situation being:
  1. the police were armed, although they did not draw their weapons [but if I had picked up a piece of wood to legally and properly protect my property, I have no doubt I would have been shot].,
  2. they purported to enter for the Brisbane City Council;
  3. they forced entry, AND BROKE AND ENTERED;
  4. the Brisbane City Council did not have authority, of any type, to enter;
  5. I had exclusive possession of my property;
  6. many possessions of mine were removed from my property;
MEANS;  ==>

that all persons involved in the common purpose, are guilty of ARMED ROBBERY, & breaking, entering and stealing.  Many more will be guilty of being accessories, accomplices and/or aiders and abettors. and thus subject to the same penalties. 

One purpose of the Armed Robbery was to give the Brisbane City Council "grounds" to write a report of "how badly I had kept the premises and yard" to provide to Hugh McVean the Trustee of the Constructive Trust so that Hugh McVean could make out to the Small Claims Tribunal [which handles Residential Tenancy Disputes] that I was a mere tenant and so have me evicted.  This "purpose" together with Hugh McVean's Secret letter of 13th September, 2004 make him an ACCESSORY TO THE ARMED ROBBERY.   For Hugh McVean, and my sister Coral Louise McVean, there is the aggravating factor, when Penalty is considered, that this crime was perpetrated while they had a Fiduciary Duty.  That usually means the Maximum penalty of imprisonment is doubled.

This was all done in this way by the McVeans and Brisbane City Council with the agreement of Douglas Porter, Chairman of, and Representative of The University of Queensland on St Johns College Council together with the other Party to St Johns College Council, the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC].   St Johns College council ran St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland.

Rantala subsequently arrested me on bogus charges so that he did not need to remain longer at the location, to ensure I did not ostensibly, "break the law" but in reality to give the armed robbers a free run. 

1st or 2nd March, 2005. 

I received the advice from Andrew Rouyanian, a Solicitor  alerting me to the reality that I was the beneficiary of a CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST and so was the Beneficial Owner of my home at 254 Hawken Drive.  One or two days later I advised my neighbour, solicitor and ex-fellow student with me in 2006 at The University of Qld, Stephen Tonge, that my home, house and land was owned by a Constructive Trust of which I was the beneficiary. Stephen Tonge had been feigning friendship towards me while knowingly working to steal my home, house and land owned by me, from me.
 
See "about Stephen Tonge".  Stephen Tonge was secretly working as lawyer and legal advisor for Douglas Porter, The University of Queensland, St Johns College Council, St Johns College, and the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane. As he was their lawyer in this matter, my advice to him was advice to all of his clients.  Trust is a matter of Equity Law.  Stephen Tonge was at that time a partner with Flower & Hart, who subsequently completed the "transfer" of the Legal Title.


7th February, 2005:

Hugh Douglas McVean, a trustee of the  Constructive Trust owning the Property at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, signed a transfer document, transferring the LEGAL TITLE OF MY PROPERTY OWNED BY ME AS BENEFICIARY OF THIS CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST, to the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane [CSDB] which is a joint venturer with The University of Queensland, in the St Johns College Council, of which Douglas Porter is Chair, and on which Douglas Porter is the Representative of The University of Queensland

May, 2005:

Hugh McVean my Trustee made out I was a mere tenant, took me to the Small Claims Tribunal to have me evicted and used as his main support, the report prepared by the Brisbane City Council when they committed the Armed Robbery, as part of his secret agreement with the Brisbane City Council to commit the Armed Robbery

These McVean criminals had brought the disabled man before Magistrate William J (Bill) Randall in May, 2005 while trying to steal the same house.  Randall is the "referee" of the Queensland Small Claims Tribunal which deals with "Residential Tenancies".  The disabled man, on that occasion, was courteous and polite [he always is] to William J (Bill) Randall.  In contrast, William J (Bill) Randall was abusive to him, and the few words William J (Bill) Randall spoke to the disabled man were loud, ABRUPT and ABUSIVE; "be quiet, you will be told when to speak".   The disabled man had commenced an action  re this matter in another higher court, the Supreme Court of Queensland.  This meant that the SCT could do nothing.  Russell Mathews had documents of the other court to show to William J (Bill) Randall.  William J (Bill) Randall was "busy" pretending to be reading the Criminal McVean's complaint.  The disabled man tells us that he tried to save William J (Bill) Randall wasting his time and so wished to show William J (Bill) Randall, the document of the other court.
 
After William J (Bill) Randall's drama outburst, the disabled man waited 'til William J (Bill) Randall had made out that he had read the criminal's complaint.  Clearly, the outcome had long been decided.  Clearly, Hugh McVean had been playing the victim to registry staff of the SCT of how he is so good and how his good nature is being abused, and this was passed on to Randall

The Criminal Hugh McVean is the psychopathic criminal [in fact Hugh McVean has PTSD] of the McVeans of Nambour Crime couple; not to be confused with the John Alexander Francis McVean Criminal of
12 Snowgum Drive, Bilambil Heights NSW 2486 with the 'phone number of +61 2 5590 8117. That John McVean is married to Marion Joan McVean. The McVean CRIME brothers seem to have a way of involving their wives in their Insurance Fraud Corruption - John McVean 'worked' his whole working life for South British Insurance.  Hugh's wife Coral Louise McVean was criminally compromised by Hugh McVean many decades ago, in Insurance Fraud.

Upon the disabled man giving the higher court document to William J (Bill) Randall, William J (Bill) Randall APOLOGISED  to Hugh McVean.  In a reasonably soft but distressed voice, William J (Bill) Randall APOLOGISED to McVean that "the matter is taken out of my hands".  "I am sorry I can do nothing.  He has commenced an action in the Supreme Court."  When he next spoke to the disabled man, he was again loud, abrupt and abusive.  Our disabled Informant tells us that it seemed to him as though William J (Bill) Randall was very familiar with McVean and his complaint, before that 2005 brief hearing commenced, and that William J (Bill) Randall had already made up is mind.   Hugh McVean's well practiced MO is to seek out decision makers, or the next in line to the decision maker [like "Registrar" of the Small Claims Tribunal [SCT]], and apologise for his "lack of knowledge or familiarity with the procedure and just explain  how he is at so much of a disadvantage because he is such a "good and Christian" person,  when in fact McVean is a "psychopathic control freak".  This is really due to Hugh McVean's PTSD.  Hugh McVean has long realized, since the tragic death of both of his parents when Hugh was aged 16 years, the value of playing the 'victim' fiction.

Hugh McVean has a well practiced patter of
playing the 'victim' fiction; along the lines that he is a poor unfortunate good souled person who has tried to do the best for his wife's "black sheep" brother, out of his compassion and charity, and this "black sheep" has taken advantage of this "poor generous and compassionate" Hugh McVean.  In fact Hugh McVean is a psychopath and pathological liar and cheat, [this is a common symptom of PTSD -  "Because the world has been so mean to me, I will place no limits upon what I will do to achieve good things for myself", is the view of many PTSD sufferers; it is a psychiatric disorder.], who set out to cheat his wife's brother to show how big he is.  IN FACT, HUGH McVEAN NEEDS TO TRY TO BOOST HIS SELF RESPECT.   He and Coral had to adopt children BECAUSE HUGH McVEAN HAD SUCH A LOW SPERM COUNT.  This little lowlife parasite, Hugh McVean WAS FIRING BLANKS He is IMPOTENT; so he became a BULLY as well as an INSURANCE FRAUDSTER CRIMINAL.  You can view an indication of this persona he adopts in one of his written emails.
McVean's FIRING BLANKS, had a benefit for society, of reducing the quantity of Criminal McVean's genes in circulation.

It seems that William J (Bill) Randall considers that the SCT is his own kingdom and that William J (Bill) Randall can grant "favours" as and when he pleases, and to hell with the law and Due Process.  Afterall, Randall has Judicial Immunity.

An alternative explanation is that because the corruption in Qld courts arises due to the Chief Justice being corrupt, and his also being Chancellor of the Anglican Diocese of Brisbane, the Paul de Jersey corruption has also become ANGLICAN CORRUPTION.  The Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan, Warden of St Johns College at The University of Queensland, thinks this has given him a licence to gain by corruption.

Clearly, William Randall was deferring to the 'ANGLICAN CORRUPTION'.
 

1st June, 2005. 

The subsequently modified bogus charge came before Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich [subsequently termed Magistrate Topsy-Turvy by Qld Court of Appeal, and "Wally" by his corrupt police mates.]  I had called/subpoenaed  various witnesses, including from the Brisbane City Council to show that the entry to my yard, the pretext upon which Rantala arrested me, was illegal.   Magistrate Wally Topsy-Turvy [Walter Harvey Ehrich] was desperate and determined that no evidence would be heard, as if the evidence had been heard, it would have shown that the police [Queensland Government] and Brisbane City Council had committed an Armed Robbery. 

12th August, 2005. 

A civil action against a number of related parties for related transactions, including for trespass on 29th November, 2004, and conversion  by the Brisbane City Council, was mentioned before Justice Margaret White in the Supreme Court of Queensland. She refused to disqualify herself for bias or conflict of interest.  She related her close connection to the University of QueenslandMargaret White struck out my pleadings, gave me leave to replead, but Ordered that Brisbane City Council be removed as a defendant in this action.  Of course I could commence another action against the Brisbane City Council, but, importantly, this made the consideration of the evidence of the Armed Robbery more remote.  Margaret White has Judicial Immunity from Prosecution for her evil actions.  Each of the Counsel coram her, being   John W. PedenJohn Peden and Mr Fraser Dawson, are also protected by Advocates Immunity.  Both Peden and White are well known to each other as Sycophants to The University of Queensland.

Consideration of her conclusion that the Brisbane City Council should be removed as a defendant needs further scrutiny. She had struck out the pleading, and given leave to replead. Therefore, she had nothing before her on which to base any decision that the Brisbane City Council be removed as a defendant. Now, it is a GIVEN, on the irrefutable evidence that the Brisbane City Council did not have authority to enter and the surrounding events, that an armed robbery by the Qld police and Brisbane City Council occurred. This Armed robbery was for the benefit of her favoured University of Queensland, its registrar Douglas Porter, and the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane, of which the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Paul de Jersey is and was, at all relevant times, Chancellor. Since this has caused me to be robbed of a vast amount of my possessions, plus been a preliminary and integral step of having me robbed of my beneficial ownership of my home for the benefit of her favoured University of Queensland and its Registrar Douglas Porter, and that that fraud of me has had many repeated steps before and since to conceal that fraud, [and this is just one step in this timeline of fraud], it suggests that Justice Margaret White, acted as she did to assist the perpetration of these frauds. This at least, suggests she is biased against me and likely to make similar “biased” decision against me in the future. Importantly, on the 25th November, 2011, Margaret White refused to disqualify herself in the Queensland Court of Appeal, and subsequently found against me, in a case related to this Armed Robbery and major fraud.


8th November, 2005:

Another extremely dumb or corrupt Queensland Government Commissioner, is John Briton, Legal Services Commissioner.  He committed his corruption in writing.   His "view" is wrong as would be known by high school students in legal studies.  See:  the Correct Legal PrincipleA Regulation or a section of a regulation  cannot over-ride a right in a statute or a common law right.    That he, and  so many others would put their corruption in writing indicates his confidence, and the confidence of so many others, in the complete widespread corruption in Queensland and Australia.

See in his attached letter the paragraph:
You are also of the view that Mr Tolton's advice is incorrect as he has misinterpreted sections 200 and 209 of the Regulation and failed to examine appropriate case law in the area. I have examined the relevant sections of the Health Regulation 1996 and the cases ref€rred to your complaint. I am of the view that Mr Tolton's advice was correct and that the BCC is not required to seek permission from a Court before entering the premises. Section 200 provides a statutory right to the BCC to enter a place after it has issued a notice pursuant to section 209 if that notice has not been complied with.

It is interesting to compare the way two different Corrupt Qld Commissioners express the same corruption.  Compare John Briton's with that written by Robert Walker now Commissioner, Body Corporate & Community Management but previously of the Qld Crime and Misconduct Commission and his letter dated 10th April, 2006. I suggest that Robert Walker's style is his admission that he knows it is false, bogus and corrupt.  When all this eventually 'hit the fan', and it will, each of the many corrupt individuals will want everyone to believe that their mistake of law was a genuine mistake.

9th February, 2006: 

In my Action against the Brisbane City Council, Justice Henry George Fryberg of the Supreme Court of Queensland  deemed me a Vexatious Litigant so summarily defeating my action against The Brisbane City Council and banning me from suing them again, so giving the protection of the Supreme court of Queensland to Armed Robbers and Fraudsters of a Disabled Old Man..  See his evil decision.  Justice Henry George Fryberg of the Supreme Court of Queensland has Judicial Immunity from Prosecution for his evil actions.  The Counsel coram him, on that occasion,  John W. Peden is also protected by Advocates Immunity.   John W. Peden is a evil corrupt obsequious barrister closely associated with Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland, where he grovels to gain undeserved privilege from Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland.    John W. Peden also acted as a conduit between The University of Queensland and the Brisbane City Council to permit the collaboration to commit the fraud.  They expect that they are protected regarding this conduit for their Conspiracy to Defraud by Client Privilege aka Legal Professional Privilege

10th April, 2006: 

In response to my complaint to the Crime and Misconduct Commission, this letter dated 10th April, 2006 was sent to me. His rational is false.  It is basic law of  Statute v Regulation   A Regulation or a section of a regulation  cannot over-ride a right in a statute or a common law right.    The Author of this, Robert Walker is clearly corrupt.  He has apparently been rewarded for his corruption by his elevation/promotion to Commissioner, Body Corporate & Community Management.   Clearly, the Body Corporate & Community Management Commission [BCCM] is part of the extensive corruption of bribery and payola in Queensland.

23rd May, 2006:

Queensland's "Assistant" Information Commissioner, Susan Barker, [ie Sue Barker; in Russian language 'subarka' - in latin script rather than Cyrillic - means DOG; - I wonder how appropriate?] the cloth eared evil incompetent public sector parasite found, in an error apparent to a high schools student of legal studies, that a regulation [Section 200] [since revoked], composed by public sector parasites and rubber stamped in a Government Gazette,  could over-ride the rights in a Statute, approved by a majority in the democratically elected parliament;. Section 160 Health Act 1937.  [The "Entry" provisions were later amended to section 144 whereby the Council could apply for a warrant from a Magistrate, ex parte.] However, at the time of the Armed Robbery, to enter, without my permission, the Brisbane City Council, and anyone entering for them were required to obtain a Mandatory Court Order after giving me a Right to be Heard [Natural Justice] in the court.  See Sub Sec (ii)Section 160 Health Act 1937.
In fact, the office of the Information Commissioner [OIC] has been an oft repeated source of coverup of the Crime of Armed Robbery by the Queensland government and the Brisbane City Council and the crime of "Land Fraud" by Douglas Porter In time we will detail here, at least THREE independent instances by the Information Commissioner of Queensland.


23rd August, 2006:

I began publishing the HaigReport.com website online as a PUBLIC MEDIA.  As such, that publication has Qualified Privilege.  Qualified Privilege is particularly robust when the publication is
  1. exposing crime;
  2. exposing lying, even mere hypocrisy, let alone FRAUD & CRIME, by Public officials or even just ANYONE in, or connected to, Public life.
  3. In combination; that is, for CRIME by PUBLIC OFFICIALS, [our Raison d'être for HaigReport.com], this Qualified Privilege is impenetrable


Qualified Privilege is a protection against all law suits, not just the usual of defamation.   It does not matter if the publication is not totally true or true at all, but only that the publisher took reasonable steps to check the accuracy.   In Australia, there is a further protection for publication in the public Media, if the subject matter is discussion related to Political Elections.  There is a Freedom of Speech related to discussion of political matters.  The general tenor of what constitutes Qualified Privilege can be gained by considered decision by the higher courts in common law jurisdictions around the world. There is for instance the TEN point test as devised by the House of Lords in the UK in the in the Reynolds Case. In a subsequent case, the House of Lords clarified that the TEN Criteria were not "hurdles" but mere POINTERS to be considered.   A subsequent case confirmed that the protection was greater not only if the matter was a discussion of political matters, but of general public interest, [which does not include mere curiosity]. 

Further Freedom of Speech protection can be gained by publishing websites on servers either in the US or where the Internet transmission is likely to pass through the United States where they have the Freedom of Speech Amendment to their Constitution.  For most purposes in law [the notable exception being defamation], the place of publication is the location of the Server on which the Website files are stored and where each page is distinctly composed by the server from the stored files and other data, each time it is accessed.

From August, 2006:

Soon after commencing my website HaigReport, I noticed the most frequent visitor each month and a usual visitor each day was Douglas Porter.  Douglas Porter was Registrar of The University of Queensland, and, unknown to me at the time, Representative of The University of Qld on, and Chairman of, the St Johns College Council that ran St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus Of The University of Qld.   I knew this regular and most frequent visitor was Douglas Porter, as he had a Fixed or Static IP, and I soon realized it was his.  We could see the Search Terms he used in Google.  In fact, Douglas Porter had the same IP for his use of the Internet from his home.  There have been  occasions when Douglas Porter was accessing my sites at 2am and 4am [on different days].   I did not realize the reason for Douglas Porter's obsession, but now realize that he was orchestrating the theft of my beneficial interest in my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, and for that purpose was orchestrating the purchase of the Legal title to my home, controlled by the trustee of the Constructive Trust..

The Two parties represented on the St Johns College Council are The University of Queensland and the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane [CSDB] aka Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC].  Soon after the appointment of Paul de Jersey as Chief Justice of Queensland, the BDAC found it "beneficial" to appoint him as "Chancellor of the BDAC.  Douglas Porter, as Chairman of St Johns college Council, secretly orchestrated the CSDB having transferred to it, the legal title of my home, of which I owned the beneficial Title, and having me dispossessed of my possession of my home so they could claim that they bought my house property without knowledge of my prior beneficial interest. In Law, this is not now nor then possible as they had already been advised of my prior beneficial Interest because I had advised their legal representative Stephen Tonge.  All this time, Porter was orchestrating repeated acts of discrimination, cheating and criminal conduct towards me by personnel at The University of Qld.  Porter should have disqualified himself from dealing with me during this time, but failed to do so. 

October 2006:

police blocked my reporting crime by blocking my emails for bogus reasons:

I communicate almost exclusively by email as I am disabled and my computer is my main disability Aid.   Because I have Brain Damage I prefer to communicate in writing.  Because I had been the target of an Armed Robbery, the "appropriate" people to whom to report this crime is the police. Because the police had committed the Armed Robbery, this was one way of discovering if the crime was by a single cop or if the whole police service was guilty. As can be seen at the second paragraph on page 2 of a letter from the Queensland police, the police blocked my emails for bogus reasons, just so they did not have to bother.  They really are corrupt. 

Anyway, if does not matter at all, as it is far better that, if I have anything to say, I say it in a PUBLIC MEDIUM such as the HaigReport.com where I and my authors have Qualified Privilege. What it does show is the culpability of the Queensland police Service.   Why would any decent person join the Queensland police? That truly is a rhetorical question.

Qualified Privilege is particularly robust in relation to exposure of Crime and Exposure of lying and hypocrisy in public life.   Publishing evidence of ARMED ROBBERY by PUBLIC OFFICIALS, should be well and truly protected.   I have quite a bit of detail about Qualified Privilege online at these previously mentioned links, and I think it is worth a  read if you have the time.      I think public publication with Qualified Privilege  is in preference to courts and governments. It changes the game. I will not bother with courts as plaintiff in civil actions, as corrupt judges and magistrates will try to just frustrate, by striking out applications, and other corrupt actions.   I will just wait 'til the corrupt parasites try to sue me in Crime.  They will not then try to have the action discontinued.  Of course, corrupt judges will try to exclude QP, but I can appeal that to the highest courts.  Usually there are no filing fees for criminal appeals [except to the Australian High Court - but that is the last stop before the case goes to a UN Court in Geneva, Switzerland]. In a criminal trial, I will have an opportunity to cross examine the perjuring police [such as my Cross Examination Of Corrupt Police Parasite Henri Elias Rantala and government officials.  As I am trained in law it is quite inexpensive for me. I would expect to obtain a better result than if I employed a "lawyer" in practice.  Those lawyers have a paramount Duty to the Court, [and corrupt judges] and have Advocates Immunity.  In general the legal profession in Queensland is CORRUPT.  Of course, each and every occasion on which I am charged by police, I have wonderful material to publish on HaigReport.com /.  See also where Brisbane Magistrate Paul M Kluck [aka Klutz] ridiculed me for being disabled, and ridiculed my disability of Brain damage.


23rd January, 2007:

I received this letter dated 23rd January, 2007 from Judy Spence the Qld Police Minister at the time.  My reaction was to write this page and send this audio message.

30th September, 2007:

At about 1am, a student intellectual lightweight named Regan Ireland began a Facebook Hate & 'Incitement to Murder' Site called, "FUCK OFF DUCKMAN".   I kept a number of ducks.  The 30th September was a Sunday in 2007. 

Douglas Porter was right onto that site, first thing Monday Morning.  I do not know if he was viewing it on Sunday.   I discovered it because Douglas Porter, in his traditional lazy  style clicked on the live hyperlink to my website haigreport.com that Simon Kalinowski has placed on the facebook Hate Site at 3:03AM on the 1st September, 2007.   Porter clearly was too dumb to realize that whenever he came to my site in that way, I was seeing the referrer site, so could tell he had been viewing the Fuck OFF DUCKMAN Site.  Douglas Porter did that every day for the month that that site was online.  As you can see I recorded most of the data from the Hate site. In particular I recorded the names of all the people who agreed with the language and sentiment of the site "SOME ONE KILL HIM PLZ"

Clearly, Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland were aware of the scandalous website called "FUCK OFF DUCKMAN'".  Yet, Douglas Porter ACTIVELY CONDONED IT.
 
The names of the 125 people are at on our site now.    We calculate that they have collectively cost themselves about $25million.

22nd May 2008:

'First" Assistant Commissioner, Rangihaeata in her diatribe dated 22nd May, 2008, found FOR BOGUS NONSENSICAL REASONS, that the Armed Robbers, the Brisbane City Council, could refuse to provide me with information pursuant to the Freedom of Information Legislation.

During August, 2008:

A corrupt parasite Superintendent Brain Hay of the Queensland police, tried to bully the webhost for HaigReport.com, in New South Wales [where Qld police have no jurisdiction] to close down all of our websites, WITHOUT GIVING ANY REASON except secrecy provision of terrorism legislation.  As a result, to save the webhost any more problems with these corrupt parasite pigs, the websites' host servers were moved overseas, although the Australian Webhost in New South Wales did not require it.  

1st December, 2008:

Because Parasite Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich had made a deceitful corrupt decision, I set about to destabilize him with publications on my website.   He made a corrupt decision on the 1st June, 2005, and importantly, when I calmly advised him appropriately, he bellowed at me " Well just SIT DOOOOWN! would you" [line 44] BIG BIG MISTAKE YOU PARASITE EHRICH.   

Here, in his own handwriting, he starts to do back flips.   I am pleased to say, my websites confronted him.


17th December, 2008:

Magistrate Topsy Turvy aka Ehrich together with compliant police prosecutor, held a farcical "hearing" so Ehrich could attempt to put the matter right.  Read the transcript.   Read the dickhead stumbling police prosecutor  Sgt COX, "og ah ow ah".  See what the Court of Appeal had to say about this.


7th February, 2009:

Queensland police attempted to close down my websites overseas for no justifiable reason [except their dislike because it exposed Queensland police corruption - "What a tangled Web" as they commit more crime to conceal earlier crime  - See their email; Scroll to the TAN PANEL on this page], without grounds and without giving me  Natural Justice which is my Right to be Heard.

28th August, 2009:

Corrupt Queensland police, because they could not close down my websites, came and seized my Disabilities Aids of computer [for my brain damage disability and hand writing disability] and Camera [for transcription due to my handwriting disability], and charged me "using a carriage service, ie broadband, to upload content to websites such that the Armed Robber, the corrupt Henri Elias Rantala, was offended or felt harassed".  It mattered not to those corrupt police that Rantala was a criminal many times over, and All websites are public media and thus have Qualified Privilege which extends to all journalists who write on these publicly viewable websites, or other employees or contractors who assist with these publications. 

14th September, 2009 to 24th September, 2010:

See the Menu of the 18 separate TRANSCRIPTS [which are all online]  of the Magistrate Court Appearances resulting from this arrest.  The four charges have not progressed to a completed Committal hearing,  yet, to the 9th April, 2012 but is at present [9th April, 2012], in the High Court of Australia.

23rd February, 2010:

My response to the arrest, charges and theft of my Disability Aids by Queensland police, was to launch an appeal, ALMOST SIX YEAR OUT OF TIME, to the conviction of me, [as confirmed in the letter from Police minister Judy Spence dated 23rd January, 2007] by magistrate "Wally" Walter Harvey Ehrich, [later called "topsy-Turvy" by the Qld Court of Appeal].

19th March, 2010:

Ex Qld DPP, and now DCJ Leanne Clare heard the appeal, and foolishly in a dumb act decided, when that decision had the effect of concealing, the egregious, evil act of magistrate "Wally" [to his corrupt police mates] Walter Harvey Ehrich, to coverup and whitewash the Armed Robbery, that the decisions of  Magistrate "topsy-Turvy"   on 1st December, 2008 and  17th December, 2008 meant I had no reason to appeal.

23rd March, 2010: 

Within days of the patently wrong decision of ex DPP now District Court Judge Leanne Clare, [as a courtesy between judicial officers, they do not mention, by name, the judges and magistrates who made the errors], I had Appealed and sought Leave to Appeal to the Queensland Court of Appeal.   I won that appeal resoundingly.

24th June, 2010:

See also the ridicule of me and my Brain Damage Disability by the foolish, dumb magistrate Paul M Kluck:  ""BENCH [Paul M Kluck]: So, have you got your thoughts back together again, Mr Mathews?" 

Although I am not unintelligent and have a Law Degree, Commerce Degree and mathematics majors in my Science Degree and Arts Degree, I do have brain damage, that produces Special Needs for me to exist, arising from my becoming quickly  mentally fatigued and soon mentally exhausted.  Despite my repeated advices and demands, Magistrate Paul M Kluck [the Klutz], refused to Accommodate my Special Needs.    Kluck the Klutz's ridicule of me and my brain damage disability is an indication of his unlawful discrimination and denial of my having a Fair Hearing.  Kluck the Klutz recognized that he had a Duty to ensure I had a fair hearingMagistrate Kluck admits he was required to ensure I was granted a Fair hearing.   In fact, Magistrate Paul M Kluck, admitted he denied me a fair hearing.  He had clearly thought that I could just be forced to continue and, in that way, denied a fair hearing.  Because of Kluck's Denial of a Fair Hearing which was thus a Denial of Due process, the hearing coram magistrate Paul M. Kluck was thus ultra vires and a nullity.   I engaged in the committal hearing for three days of the six days allocated. After those three days, I refused to appear for three months while Kluck continued to threaten me.  Finally, on the 24th September, 2010, Kluck referred this hearing to the District Court to determine if I was "fit to stand trial".    I ceased attending about three week BEFORE my resounding victory, and most of the "deliberations" by Kluck Klutz occurred AFTER that decision of my RESOUNDING VICTORY.

After Kluck had terminated his involvement in my case, for the time being, I lodged a Section 222 of the Justices Act of 1886 (Qld) Appeal to the District Court.  That meant that the single thread of court cases, had become two, and my appeal thread took precedence in time.


 

20th July, 2010:

I had a resounding victory in the Queensland Court of Appeal of the Decision [in fact decisionSS], of Magistrate Wally, Topsy Turvy, Walter Harvey Ehrich of 1st June, 2005, 1st December, 2008 and 17th December, 2008.    I suspect those responsible for the extensive corruption in Queensland, as I have experienced it, might have been feeling a little uneasy especially given the dicta by Her Honour McMurdo P. /.



25th October, 2010:


After Kluck had terminated his involvement in my case, for the time being, I lodged a Section 222 of the Justices Act of 1886 (Qld) Appeal to the District Court.  That meant that the single thread of court cases, had become two, and my appeal thread took precedence in time.

I lodged my Section 222 of the Justices Act of 1886 (Qld)Appeal to the Decisions of Kluck, to the District CourtThe Judge, second in line to the corrupt Chief District Court Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe, one KJOB [DCJA (Administrator) Kerry John O'Brien] took control of my two cases [the two threads], in the District Court and expressed his determination to maintain control of them himself.

25th October, 2010:

See the site discussing how DCJA [District Court Judge Administrator] Kerry John O'Brien [KJOB] wanted to stamp his mark on my Cases.

25th October, 2010:

See the Menu of matters surrounding the TWO MATTERS to be heard in the District Court.

4th November, 2010:

See the Menu of matters of Public Sector parasites in the District Court Registry trying to stuff me around.

25th November, 2011:

My appeal of the decision of the DCJA Kerry John O'Brien [just KJOB in my work] was heard in the Qld Court of Appeal.   Importantly, all three judges including the evil Margaret White, refused to disqualify themselves.

13th December, 2011:

Justice Margaret White, was lead judge on the Court of Appeal Panel, which delivered their decision refusing to invoke their Original Jurisdiction to consider the irrefutable evidence properly before them in this matter, where that irrefutable evidence showed that the Brisbane City Council and the Government of Queensland that had appointed her, [Justice Margaret White], and The University of Queensland were guilty of Armed Robbery and Criminal Fraud of a Disabled Old Man.


Of course, as I have explained previously, the point of our uploading these pages before all the content has been added to the individual pages, but still promoting these pages in the top panel of each of the hundreds of thousands of page imprints each months produced by our websites., is so that Google et al will see that the pages are being constantly upgraded and so Google et al  will rate our pages more highly

3rd January, 2012:

On this day, 3rd January, 2012, I sought "special" leave of the High Court of Australia to appeal the above decision of the Queensland Court of Appeal, when the bench was lead by the egregious  Justice Margaret White.   Today [21st April, 2012,] no decision has been forthcoming from the HCA.   Should my application fail there, I have then exhausted all domestic remedies.  Exhausting all domestic remedies is a condition to my then taking this as a "communication" [a further "appeal"] to the UN's Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Geneva, Switzerland.  I  clearly have standing to so "appeal" as I am disabled.    I can easily and irrefutably prove that I am disabled and that the Armed Robbery occurred and the involvement of the Executive Government of the Commonwealth of Australia in that so invoking the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities .  I can then show that my disability has been related to the Armed Robbery and to my subsequent arrest and trial.  That that "original crime" of Armed Robbery has been or attempted to have been concealed or covered-up by Qld police, Magistrates,  JudgeS, Qld Government Commissions and Commissioners, and COMMONWEALTH PROSECUTORS, with bogus, and clearly false "justifications" will highlight just how extensive the corruption is in Qld & AUSTRALIA.  This REALIZATION of the REALITY of CRIME in AUSTRALIA, will just cascade through these subsequent events.   With each event of "coverup" in turn, the extent or size of the Qld corruption has been shown to be that much more ingrained & EXTENSIVE.  This monumental corruption then has an effect cascading back through corrupt events preceding the Armed Robbery on 25th November, 2004.

I am astounded at the level of corruption in Queensland and Australia, that these events confirm.  This level of corruption in the CRIMINAL ELITE, has been permitted to permeate our society due principally to the apathy of people in general and Australians in particular.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.

COMMON LAW QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE


10.5 In order to rely on a defence of qualified privilege at common law, the person who makes a statement must have an interest or a duty (legal, social or moral), to make the statement to the person to whom it is made, and the recipient of the statement must possess an interest in receiving, or a duty to receive, the information that corresponds with the interest or duty of the person making the statement.5 The question of moral or social duty is a question on the facts of each case.6 According to traditional learning, proving reciprocity of duty and interest poses difficulties for mass media defendants who attempt to rely on the defence. Only in exceptional cases would a person have an interest or duty to publish defamatory matter to the world at large.7 Further, the defence is not absolute as it may be defeated if the plaintiff can establish that the defendant’s conduct was motivated by malice. One way to prove malice is to show that the publisher did not have an honest belief in the truth of what was published.8


10.6 In the light of the majority judgments in Stephens v WA Newspapers9 and Theophanous, the traditional understanding of common law qualified privilege now needs re-evaluation in respect of the reciprocal interest and duty requirement. Although the common law has on occasion upheld defences of qualified privilege for publications to the world at large,10 it has generally taken a restricted view of the occasions when a person has an interest or duty to publish material to the general public. However, the joint majority judgment in Theophanous now holds that the public at large has an interest in the discussion of political matters such that each and every person has an interest, of the kind contemplated by the common law, in communicating his or her views on those matters and each and every person has an interest in receiving information on those matters. Such an interest exists at all times, and it therefore follows that the discussion of political matters is an occasion of qualified privilege.11 This very substantial expansion of the range of privileged occasions was applied in a recent Victorian case.12


10.7 A more limited extension of the scope of the defence was proposed by Justice McHugh in his dissenting judgment in Stephens. Justice McHugh was of the view that the general public has a legitimate interest in receiving information concerning matters relevant to the exercise of public functions and powers vested in public representatives and officials. His Honour was also of the opinion that persons with special knowledge of the exercise of public functions or powers or the performance by public representatives or officials of their duties, will, on occasions, have a corresponding duty or interest to communicate information concerning such functions, powers and performances to members of the general public. As a result, the existing common law categories of qualified privilege should be extended to protect communications made by such persons - for example, whistleblowers and investigative journalists. Such protection should also extend to the media which have an ancillary privilege to publish such information in good faith.13


10.8 Another limited extension of qualified privilege, focusing also on the role of the media in reporting statements of public interest, was proposed by Justice Brennan in his dissenting judgment in Stephens. His Honour would attach a qualified privilege to media reports, other than those of the proceedings of public bodies, where there is a duty to inform the public in order to allow the public to perform its own proper functions as viewed from time to time. Whether or not the privilege would attach in any case depends on a balancing of four factors: the “public interest” content of the statement; the fairness and accuracy of the report; the publisher’s reasonable belief that the maker of the statement had particular knowledge of the defamatory matter; and the opportunity afforded to the defamed party to respond. The requirement that the defamed person must have been offered a right of reply is noteworthy. It is aimed (like the requirement that the publisher have a reasonable belief that the maker of the statement has particular knowledge of the defamatory matter), at providing the public with some assurance of the truth of the defamatory statement.14


SECTION 22 OF THE DEFAMATION ACT 1974 (NSW)


10.9 While the first two conditions of this section overcome the restrictions of the reciprocity requirement at common law,15 it is the interpretation of “reasonableness” which defendants (particularly media defendants) see as unduly limiting the scope of the defence. Section 22 may have been intended to provide the same protection as that available pursuant to s 17(d) and s 17(e) of the Defamation Act 1958 (NSW).16 Those sections provided a defence of qualified privilege in specific cases where the publication was in answer to an inquiry, or where the purpose of it was to provide information. They did not require any examination of the circumstances of the publication; in particular, there was no requirement for a defendant to establish belief in the truth of what was published.17 However, it was quickly established that section 22 did not have the same effect as the provisions of the 1958 Act.18 For section 22 requires that the defendant’s conduct in publishing must be reasonable in the circumstances, and this does not solely depend on the extent of the recipient’s interest in knowing the truth.


10.10 The meaning of “reasonableness” in this context was authoritatively established by the Court of Appeal in Morgan v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd.19 This decision explains the construction of s 22 (1)(c) in the following way: in circumstances where a publisher intends to convey an imputation that is found to be conveyed, the defendant must establish that it believed in the truth of that imputation; but where a defendant did not intend to convey any imputation which was in fact so conveyed, the defendant must establish that its conduct was nevertheless reasonable in relation to each imputation it did not intend to convey but which was in fact conveyed. Reasonableness in the latter case requires the court to take into account whether the defendant held a belief in the truth of the matter published, but it is not the sole factor consdered by the court.20


10.11 Some media submissions received in response to DP 32 voiced dissatisfaction with this unwarranted emphasis on proof of belief in truth. It was argued that this does not serve the public interest in the free flow of information. Generally, media submissions tended to prefer versions of statutory qualified privilege - such as those found in s 17(e) of the Defamation Act 1958 (NSW) - which do not require the reasonableness of a defendant’s conduct to depend on the defendant’s belief in the truth, but focus rather on the strength of the recipient’s interest in knowing the truth.21 Suggested reform of s 22 excluded the necessity of establishing an honest belief in the truth of any imputation held to arise; however, it was accepted that publication of matter that was known to be untrue should negate such a defence.22


10.12 A factor underlying media concerns with the interpretation of section 22 is the fear of possibly having to reveal sources in order to establish an honest belief in the truth of what is published. This issue is addressed below at paras 10.21-10.27.


THE CONSTITUTIONAL DEFENCE


10.13 In Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Commonwealth23 and Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills,24 the High Court recognised a constitutional implication of freedom of political discussion, derived from the principle of representative government which forms part of the Constitution. The majority in Theophanous and Stephens held that the constitutional implication extends in principle to State defamation laws which may otherwise restrict the freedom of the people to engage in political discussion. They were further of the opinion that existing State defamation laws do seriously inhibit freedom of communication on political matters, especially in relation to the views, conduct and suitability for office of an elected representative of Parliament.


10.14 The High Court held that, where the defendant publishes false and defamatory statements in the course of political speech, the defendant is not liable in damages in a defamation claim unless the defendant can show that: (a) it was unaware of the falsity of the matter; (b) it did not publish recklessly (that is, not caring whether the matter was true or false); and (c) the publication was reasonable in all the circumstances.25 “Reasonableness” in these circumstances requires a defendant to show that it took steps to check the accuracy of the material published, or that it was justified in publishing without checking, or that it took steps that were adequate in the circumstances.26


10.15 Theophanous provides the media with a defence to a defamation action when material is published in the course of political discussion. The efficacy and range of the defence as a “media defence” will, however, depend on a number of factors. First, as we have already discussed in this Report, the parameters of “political discussion” have yet to be determined.27 Thus, it is not yet clear whether or not the defence will only arise when the plaintiff is a member of Parliament, a parliamentary candidate or a public official.


10.16 Secondly, the meaning which the courts give to the “reasonableness” requirement of the Theophanous test will be crucial.28 Both at common law29 and pursuant to section 22,30 “reasonableness” in the context of qualified privilege normally requires an honest belief in the truth of what was published. But the focus in Theophanous was on whether adequate and appropriate steps were taken to check the accuracy of the material,31 rather than on the defendant’s belief in the truth of the material. The majority likened the implied freedom to the statutory defence of lawful excuse provided by section 377(1)(h) of the Criminal Code (Qld).32 The policy behind the Queensland defence is the encouragement and protection of freedom of discussion on a matter of public interest for the benefit of the public. The provision does not require that persons wishing to participate in the discussion of matters of public interest must satisfy themselves of the truth of the facts upon which the discussion is based.33 This seems to indicate that belief in the truth of what is published does not form part of the constitutional defence.


10.17 Thirdly, to the extent to which “political discussion” and “reasonableness” prove limiting factors, the constitutional defence may prove practically unimportant in the light of the broad view of common law qualified privilege taken by the majority in Theophanous and in Stephens v WA Newspapers.34 The joint majority judgment in Theophanous35 stated that the availability of the defence derived from the Constitution will inevitably have the consequence that the common law defence of qualified privilege will have little, if any, practical significance where publication occurs in the course of the discussion of political matters. However, this proposition is difficult to reconcile with the expansion of common law qualified privilege to cover “political discussion”.36


EVALUATION OF COMMON LAW QUALIFIED PRIVILEDGE, SECTION 22 AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL DEFENCE


10.18 The Commission has been concerned throughout this Report to ensure that reform of the law of defamation only interferes with freedom of speech where the provision of such freedom would tilt too heavily against protection of reputation. A consequence of the decision in Theophanous is a greater latitude for freedom of political speech. Deterrence of even ill-founded political statements is liable to be subversive of the basis and working of the system of representative government.37 Outside the context set by that decision, however, the balance between freedom of speech and protection of reputation needs to be weighed differently. While the Commission recognises that the media have an important role in conveying information about State agencies and public officials to the public, it does not suggest that the media should have a generally privileged status in public debate.38


10.19 Whatever the truth or falsity of the allegedly defamatory matter, providing the community with information on a topic of political discussion may override in importance any consideration of compensating damage to individual reputation, provided that the publication is a reasonable one.39 However, for some issues that fall outside the scope of “political matters”, there may not be an equivalent public interest factor (other than curiosity and scandal-mongering) which could afford similar immunity. In such cases, the protection of personal reputation may outweigh the public’s interest in the subject matter. In those cases, both the common law and s 22 require a publisher to demonstrate that the publication was reasonable by proving an honest belief in the truth of what was published. The Commission believes that this premise is correct, for freedom of speech is not unqualified and the power which it confers requires accountability.40


10.20 The Commission makes no recommendation to alter the existing common law or statutory qualified privilege defence at this stage. In the Commission’s view, any developments regarding the duty/interest requirement should be left to the common law. Given the state of flux into which the recent High Court decisions have plunged the law of qualified privilege, any codification of the common law at this stage would be premature.


REVELATION OF SOURCES


10.21 The statutory defence of qualified privilege requires a defendant to establish that the publication was reasonable. As a part of proving “reasonableness”, the publisher is usually required to establish a belief in the truth of the matter published. How a court requires a defendant to prove that belief will depend on the circumstances of each case. The defendant may be required to reveal the source of the allegedly defamatory material to show its conduct was reasonable (rather than identifying the defendant’s source generally).


10.22 In John Fairfax & Sons v Cojuangco, the High Court stated that:


It is a fundamental principle of our law, repeatedly affirmed by Australian and English courts, that the media and journalists have no public interest immunity from being required to disclose their sources of information when such disclosure is necessary in the interests of justice.41


Potentially this conflicts with a section of the Journalists’ Code of Ethics which states that journalists shall “in all circumstances ... respect all confidences received in the course of their calling”.42


10.23 Journalists believe that their ethical code creates a conscience based bar to disclosure of the name of a source where they have been provided with information on an undertaking that the identity of the source will remain confidential.43 The Code does not create any legal privilege to maintain confidentiality, and courts regard a refusal to disclose a journalist’s source as a contempt of court. Recent cases have highlighted the dilemma faced by journalists, who insist that the confidential nature of their relationship with a source is vital to the media’s role as a facilitator of free communication and outweighs the need of the court to have all relevant and admissible information before it.44


10.24 Although the “newspaper rule” allows a newspaper publisher, proprietor or editor to withhold information about the name of the writer of the article which is the subject of the action and about the sources of information supporting the article, this rule only pertains to interlocutory proceedings. It is not applicable at a defamation trial because the question of malice is often an issue and it may become necessary to identify the source in order to assess the motive behind the disclosure of the allegedly defamatory material.


10.25 After examining this specific problem in detail, the Western Australian Law Reform Commission and the Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs have recently concluded that a form of statutory judicial discretion should be introduced to excuse a journalist, in the circumstances of the particular case, from answering questions about the identity of a confidential source.


10.26 Such a discretion would balance competing public interests and would be exercised after consideration of a number of factors, including: whether the evidence about the source’s identity is essential to the issue of the case; the truth of statements made about the plaintiff; whether the witness has been given the opportunity to contact the source in order to seek a waiver; whether the communication is of such a nature that it is reasonable that it should be revealed; whether withholding evidence about the identity of the source will cause unfair prejudice to a party to the proceedings; and whether the evidence is obtainable by other means which will not add significantly to the time taken by, or the costs of the proceedings.45


10.27 While these issues are essentially ones of contempt and evidence they effect defamation proceedings and therefore require comment by the Commission. The Commission believes that the proposals outlined in para 10.25 go a long way to strike a balance between the competing public interests in the administration of justice and in maintaining a free flow of information.



Additionally, or alternatively, 
I effectively move from the Bar Table, given that I am disabled and that this procedure is a Reasonable adjustment to alleviate the effects of my disability, [in fact it is the preferred option by many courts to decide matters "on the papers"], that this District Court should find:

These proceedings be stayed permanently as their continuation is a matter of Disability Discrimination, in breach of both the Disability Discrimination Act (1992) [DDA] and additionally or alternatively, a breach of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD].

Given that those four websites are protected by Qualified Privilege, it is Disability discrimination to put me through this ordeal of court cases with the possible prospect of my being jailed for three and up to 12 years.

Additionally,  I effectively move from the Bar Table, given that I am disabled and that this procedure is a Reasonable adjustment to alleviate the effects of my disability, [in fact it is the preferred option by many courts to decide matters "on the papers"], that this District Court should order & find:

That the precise written decision in regard to these motions be provided to me BY EMAIL, in a timely fashion so I may consider  it, in a timely manner.



Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
International Disability & Seniors Rights Advocate
invoking
UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
& UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
See my RESOUNDING VICTORY 20th July, 2010 in
Qld Court of Appeal  The "Talk of the Legal World"

see: Today's  HAIG     HAIG HOT_TOPICS

Click HERE 

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of
      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND
Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]



RussellMathewsEmailSignatureDRA

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
International Disability & Seniors Rights Advocate
invoking
UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
& UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
See my RESOUNDING VICTORY 20th July, 2010 in
Qld Court of Appeal  The "Talk of the Legal World"
http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopicsEdit20101009ForOpenOffice.php

see: Today's  HAIG     HAIG HOT_TOPICS

Click HERE 

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of
      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND
Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]




See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
PHPincludes/includedWrittenByRussellMathews.php
Web-site, Written, Coded, Produced and Directed by
Russell G H Mathews
BCom BSc LLB BA

International Disability Rights Advocate
invoking
UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
& UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Image
CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE

View list of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards
Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html



 Menu: Corrupt Qld Judiciary: Favours Untouchable Banks FRAUD; What is Chief Justice of Supreme Court of Qld, Paul deJersey doing?

/PHPincludesCorruptQldJudiciary/includedMenuCorruptQldJudiciary.php

Menu: Corrupt Qld Judiciary: Chief Justice Paul de Jersey

Publications by John Alfred SALMON: retired Bank Manager, [for NAB].

  1. THE UNTOUCHABLE BANKS: An exposé of banking process and legal deception; by John A Salmon
  2. Problems Experienced by Bank Litigants in the Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Queensland



 HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:


See: the Menu: for HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD:

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld: The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ:

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: the Menu: for  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
PHPincludesProofSappideenWalkerLister/includedOverviewMultipleUniversityQueenslandDouglasPorterFrauds.php

Overview, Synopsis, or Summary of Public Sector Parasites Bullying specifically The University of Queensland & its previous registrar [for 22 years], Douglas Porter:

When one has a great amount of factual material to relate, one has to organize it so the reader can enter the narrative.  With the internet and Google and other search engines, that is unlikely to be at the "beginning", [if there is such a thing as a "beginning"].  Basically, what I have to do is to have various levels of narrative.  One level needs to have all the facts connected in detail.  No group of facts is a closed group, but rather, facts or aspects of one group of facts, relate to, or are identical to, facts or aspects of other groups.  As well, the reader/visitor does not want to read everything ever written.  Hence I need to have various levels of summary.  One level of summary will summarize the detailed facts.  Above that, is another level of summary that will summarize a number of summaries, according to common factors or relationships, in the level below.  Sometimes, when writing the detailed facts level, another aspect, or one or more of those facts, may require a detailed analysis.   Of course, the factual situation can be viewed from a number of perspectives.  Thankfully, Google et al, will index all of those.

Menus will tend to serve that role of a summary, but merely one summary or overview..  This text could be viewed as a Menu in a narrative.  This section will link to the various parts of our websites that are referenced from here.

There are basically FOUR episodes where the University of Queensland has cheated, defrauded and discriminated against me because I am disabled.  There exists a great amount of overlap between the episodes.  Of course, the outcome of each was that I was cheated and defrauded badly.   These facts I relate reflect badly upon The University of Queensland administration and Douglas Porter in particular.

Chronologically, from 1992 four main episodes are, the Law School, in 1993, 1994 and 1995 at least, the maths department and the EPSA faculty in particular Andrew Lister in 1997 to 2001, at least, then in 2003 - 2006 the dumb femi-nazi "Queen" Janine Schmidt was "chief" librarian at UQ attacked, defrauded and discriminated against me because I was disabled.   The Criminal culminating fraud by Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland was Porter's secretly orchestrating the defrauding me of my home, for the benefit of the University of Queensland and the UQ college called St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of UQ, when Porter was secretly  the Chair of the Council that ran St Johns College.

I am a mathematician.  My greatest skills are in maths.  I guess that could be because I have always had a writing disability, undiagnosed until circa 1993.  In school, all my written work was poorly written.  Hence, as teachers who mark work, see it as a chore and tedious job to be finished as quickly as possible, judge a work by how it looks or feels to them, and gives a subjective mark.  With maths, the teachers would see the correct answer, the correct diagrams so I would receive full marks, regularly.

I returned to The University of Queensland [UQ] in 1991 doing maths.  I did well. At that time, I had hassles with public sector parasites, lying parasites and police so decided to study law at UQ.  That began the episode of repeated occasions of my being attacked, cheated and defrauded by the law school by particular individuals within the law school and within the administration of The University of Queensland.   The University of Queensland was vicariously liable for that.  The next major episode occurred with the Maths department part of the Engineering, Physical science & Architecture "Super" faculty under the Executive Dean Andrew Lister.

Fraud by Douglas Porter, The University of Queensland, [part of the Australian Government], by defrauding a disabled reclusive old man of his HOUSE & LAND; including Douglas Porter's being linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity

These pages will be developed to expose the defrauding of a disabled, and hence reclusive old man of his house and land at 254 Hawken Drive St Lucia [view MAP] by Douglas Porter, the previous Registrar of The University of Queensland, for use by The University of Queensland.  Douglas Porter had been attacking, bullying and discriminating against this disabled reclusive old man since the early 1990s when he was a mature age student at The University of Queensland.

Porter was closely associated with two others linked to the Attempted MURDER of the disabled old man, being the then recent law lecturers Quentin Bryce, and Patsy Mary Wolfe.  The disabled old man was, at that time, a student of law at the University of Queensland, where Porter was Registrar.  Porter was engaged in bullying 
the disabled old man prior to the Attempted Murder of the disabled old man, and subsequenly, but then with greater  gusto.   Douglas Porter, then, as clandstine Chair of the St Johns College Council, that ran the St Johns College on the St Lucia, Brisbane Campus of The University of Queensland, began to secretly orchestrate the theft of the home of the disabled old man; the house and land owned in trust by the disabled old man, to take advantage of the fact that the disabled old man was under a strident attack..  

LinkToAspinallInPorterPanel.php This Profile Panel re the parasitic Douglas Porter, rewarded by the anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall and the anglican church, because Porter used confidential information obtained as Registrar of The University of Queensland, to assist Phillip Aspinall steal the home of a vulnerable disabled guy links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud of this vulnerable disabled guy by anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall.

  Douglas PORTER is linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity.
See fat pig parasite Porter playing with himself

  masturbating

in his office. So, what can you expect from The University of Queensland?
Write and tell us what you think about this University.
  Douglas Porter taken at 9:55AM 12th July, 2006 in his office at The University of Queensland where he was at that time, Registrar of The University of Queensland, and also clandestinely, the Representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly Chairman of, the St Johns College Council which runs St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland.  For years prior and years since then, Porter was secretly scheming to steal my home, beneficially owned by me, from me, by threatening and manipulating the emotionally challenged emotional shell of the trustee.

Concurrently, while I was then a student at the Universiity of Queensland, Douglas Porter, as Registrar, repeatedly discriminated against me in relation to my use of the libraries and my being accompanied by my two wee assistance dogs while on the campus of UQ.

Just days before the armed robbery on me on 29th November, 2004, by corrupt cop [and Armed Robber] at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, as a preliminary and integral step towards stealing my property [my home, my beneficially owned house and land], from me, all orchestrated by Douglas Porter, Douglas Porter had that same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala charge me with bogus criminal charges. No doubt this was intended to complicate my life even more than my life was being complicated, on top of my disabilities, by all the Douglas Porter inspired disability discrimination of me in UQ libraries, so making the theft of my home even easier for The University of Queensland.


We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this intellectual lightweight and corrupt gutless parasite .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 .   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 . 

Douglas Porter was The University of Queensland's SECRETIVE/CLANDESTINE representative, [and Chair], on the Governing body of one college, St Johns College at the University of Queensland - [see 7th paragraph of this linked UQ publication] or our copy.   [Of course, The University of Queensland has complete control of that land on which the college is built, with its complicated legal arrangement.]  The Governing body is called the the St Johns College Council [SJCC] and Douglas Porter is the Chair of the SJCC. Important in the workings of St Johns College and the St Johns College Council, is the SJCC Budget.  The Warden of St Johns College is the fraudster the Rev John Morgan.  He is answerable to the SJCC for the running of SJC.  In particular, he is petrified of his spending being in excess of the SJCC budget.  He even attempts to defraud to avoid spending money that is not in the SJCC budget.  Earlier that year, Morgan admitted lying to me the previous year, so that he would not have to face up to the St Johns College Council [SJCC], for having spent money that he was legally required to spend, that was, however, not in the SJCC budget.  

Hence, SJCC is a part of the Australian Government Sector, as is The University of Queensland.  Also involved in this fraud were other divisions of the Australian Public Sector, namely the Brisbane City Council, Queensland Police [including the most senior level, on the evidence of the Queensland Police], Queensland Courts especially Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and Supreme Court Judge Henry George Fryberg. Others were involved for the money they would make from it and to be "on the in" with corrupt public sector parasites.  These include lawyer Stephen Tonge, [view home of Tonge on MAP]  then a partner of Firm of lawyers Flower & Hart but more recently of Tress Cox.  Some Capital Funding was provided by the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church aka the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Paul de Jersey, is the Chancellor of the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC].  They provided the funding for an expected return [albeit fraudulent] of approximately 20% year on year plus a locked in Capital Gain well in excess of CPI indexation.

Because the Australian Government has been involved in defrauding this disabled reclusive old man, this matter, and his being defrauded of his Commonwealth Disability Support Pension by Centrelink, will end up coram/before UN committees in Geneva pursuant to Australia's acceding to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.   The Corrupt Australian Government and all parts of it involved in this widespread fraud should be greatly shamed and we will expose them.

The Queensland Court of Appeal, the highest court in Queensland, has recently spoken on this matter.  [It was written up in the Brisbane newspaper as "Talk of the Legal World".], However, there is far more to come.

includedSummaryCaseFraudPoliceAndCDPP.php

Summary of the case by the Criminal, corrupt & FRAUDULENT Qld police AGAINST Disabled Old Man

This is the case where corrupt police and a corrupt Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, attempt to use brute force, of police arrest and harassment to silence the disabled old man, to conceal how the Queensland police performed an Armed Robbery on him to Assist the Queensland Government defraud the disabled old man of his house and land that he owned and which was his home.

The disabled old man has brain damage caused by severe head injury when a teenager.  That affects his ability to "work" for any but short time periods.  He is able to concentrate for only short periods. This is near impossible for a casual observer to notice.  He quickly becomes fatigued and if he is forced to continue to try to concentrate, that results in mental exhaustion.  On the first day of hearing, knowing the disabled old man's disability and the nature of it, Magistrate Klutz ridiculed the disabled old man, even though the disabled old man was trying hard to accommodate what the Magistrate desired.   CLEARLY, THE DISABLED OLD MAN MUST REFUSE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS, UNLESS AND UNTIL HIS SPECIAL NEEDS CONSEQUENT UPON HIS DISABILITIES ARE FULLY ACCOMMODATED.   THIS IS ESSENTIAL IF HE IS TO RECEIVE DUE PROCESS.  THE ONUS IS UPON THE MAGISTRATE, JUDGE AND DECISION MAKER, TO ENSURE THAT THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS EXTENDED DUE PROCESS aka NATURAL JUSTICE.

THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS HAPPY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS PROVIDED HE RECEIVES DUE PROCESS. 

The real crux of this fraud upon the disabled old man and concurrently, UPON THE JUSTICE AND LEGAL SYSTEM OF QUEENSLAND AND AUSTRALIA, is that this disabled old man is being prosecuted in the most contemptuous way, to continue the EXPLOITATION OF HIS BEING DISABLED BY THE QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT, in that the Queensland Government, defrauded/stole from the disabled old man, the house and land that he owned that was his home, for the use of and by The University of Queensland.  The clandestine fraud was orchestrated by the Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  The fraud involved an ARMED ROBBERY of the disabled old man by Queensland Police in company with a Queensland government Authority, for the benefit of another Queensland Government authority viz, The University of Queensland. The case involved a fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man. The same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala also charged the disabled old man with other charges to favour The University of Queensland, who had been defrauding the disabled old man for years.  ..

Instead of the Australian government doing as it should to honour its International Commitments [
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]] to rail against exploitation of disabled persons, it is actually perpetuating, ITSELF, the exploitation of this disabled old man, because no doubt, the exploitation of the disabled old man was by the Queensland Government, and a number of parts of the Queensland Government in collusion.

This fraud of the disabled old man was orchestrated by Queensland Public Sector Parasite, Douglas Porter, when he was Registrar of The University of Queensland, for the benefit of The University of Queensland and to punish the disabled old man for standing up for his rights as a Disabled person, while at The University of Queensland.  Involved in the Porter perpetrated fraud was an ARMED ROBBERY by the Queensland Government being the Queensland police in particular corrupt cops Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony, of the disabled old man at his home together with a concurrent fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man by the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala.

The law confirms that the Armed Robbery by Henri EliasRantala and Monica Louise Antony, was actually a CRIMINAL
armed robbery. The factual evidence is also online.  The conduct constituting the armed robbery was not just accidental.   The perpetrators of the fraud, Queensland Public Sector parasites, set out to create what they expected would be an arguable case TO JUSTIFY THE "ARMED ROBBERY" as just part of their normal operations.    They created a RUSE for just that reasonHowever, the silly bitch lawyer Joanne Whiting, did not know what she was doing, so clearly the Ruse was hatched by one of her superiors.

That fact then begs the question of the purpose of that
RUSE and armed robbery, and exposes the perpetrators of the defrauding of the disabled old man of his home.  Because the Queensland Government perpetrated the fraud of the disabled old man of his home, his house and land, the Queensland government wants it concealed.  Therefore, the conduct of prosecuting the disabled old man is criminal and makes the perpetrated an accessory to the fraud.  The evidence giving those prosecuting the disabled old man a "guilty mind" is all that evidence on that webpage.  Those involved now in "prosecuting" the disabled old man  are criminal. 

While the corrupt parasite Shane Hunter, a prosecutor from the Commonwealth DPP, had the knowledge that the corrupt police Rantala and Antony did commit an armed robbery, he cannot be prosecuted as he has "advocates' immunity".  However, none of the others involved in the process of prosecuting the Disabled Old Man have immunity.  Corrupt ex-cop [now 'working' for KPMG] Brendan Scott Read had put another "prosecutor" from the CDPP right into the frame, by admitting they colluded to bring the false charges against the disabled old man, but that prosecutor was not an advocate in this matter, so does not have
advocates' immunity.  That other parasite from the CDPP is named Anthony Gett.  Corrupt ex-cop Brendan Scott Read also does not have immunity from prosecution for being an accessory to the Armed Robbery and to the defrauding the disabled old man of his house and land, worth in the order of $1million.  Of course, we will be assisting the disabled old man to gain many more similar house and land properties in the area from the Fraudsters.  This will include the house of the defrauding lawyer who did the transfer of the title with full knowledge of the fraud.  His name is Stephen Tonge.  The Queensland Government, both the Queensland Public Sector university, The University of Queensland, and the Queensland Government of Anna Bligh proper,  will be up for the majority of the damages.  This all arose because the disabled old man IS disabled.  It was thought by the public sector parasites, with UQ Registrar Douglas Porter, as the lead criminal in the box seat driving the fraud of the disabled old man, that the disabled old man was ripe for exploitation, because he is permanently disabled.  Now, the Commonwealth of Australia, in the person of the corrupt Commonwealth DPP prosecutor Shane R. Hunter, has joined the fray exploiting the disabled old man.  This in in stark contravention of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The parasitic Federal labor government acceded to the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities  on 21st August, 2009.

Because all the police involved in the prosecution of the disabled old man, are presumed to know the detail of the evidence proving the armed robbery because the evidence and legal reason is in the Public Domain, online and it would be reasonable to presume that police would check its validity, and we know the evidence is 100% genuine, then all the police including the police solicitor Paxton Booth are put in the frame by the evidence of Brendan Scott Read.  The other police aware of the criminal conduct in which they were engaged included  Detective Sergeant Steven Bignall, Detective Senior Constables Gavin Hackett and Detective Senior Constable Dave Graham.  Each of these has been engaged in a criminal activity.  This amounts to 

Because parasitic fraudster Shane Hunter of the CDPP was prepared to prosecute these charges, when he knew the evidence proved that police Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony committed an Armed Robbery, suggests that he expected a win, meaning that he knew the Magistrates Court, and possibly the District Court are corrupt, like as displayed, maybe by Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and District Court Judge Leanne Clare.  that .d ..


This case now has a high profile International dimension.  Australia has ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD].  Importantly, the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia has, on 21st August, 2009 acceded to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [OP].  As shyster Shane Hunter is a Commonwealth Public Servant within the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, a Commonwealth Agency, a part of the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, he and it are subject to the OP.  As the disabled old man has already suffered extensive discrimination, and fraud, at the hands of Shyster Shane Hunter, breach of the CRPD has already occurred and hence, pursuant to the OP, formal complaint can be made to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Geneva, Switzerland, once all domestic Australian remedies have been exhausted, or effectively exhausted.

The summary for each day will be a Menu of the anchors [or markers/tags] placed in the Transcript of this day.  It will be effectively a Summary of the discussion between the Magistrate Paul M Kluck [the Klutz] and Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, [who knows the evidence that  proves the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala did in fact commit an armed robbery because no-one had authority to enter exclusively possessed land, on that occasion; they needed a court order but did not have one].  The disabled old man did not appear in the committal hearing coram Kluck, after 28th June, as he had become ill from the constant barrage of harassment and jibes aimed at his disabilities, and attacks upon his weaknesses caused by his disabilities, from the Magistrate Kluck the Klutz and from the Commonwealth Government lawyer fraudster Shane Hunter.  Of course, neither need worry as Magistrate Klutz has Judicial Immunity and shyster Shane Hunter who knows he is assisting a crime perpetrated by the Government against a disabled citizen, including EXPLOITATION of the DISABLED, to remain concealed, has Advocates' Immunity.  In Kluck's court, Due Process was abrogated, because the disabled old man had Special Needs that were not accommodated by Paul M Kluck. Hence, from that moment, Kluck's court became a nullity. Thus, from then, the disabled old man was denied Due Process.  Read on the transcript, how Magistrate Kluck ridiculed the disabled old man.

At the time of committing the Armed Robbery of the disabled old man, Henri Elias Rantala illegally arrested the disabled old man so as to keep him from his home while his home was ransacked and his yard was cleared of all of his possession to order of the Queensland Government, who wished to take control of his property in quick time, for The University of Queensland to use.  This was orchestrated by the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  Well, on 20th July, 2010, 22 days after the last day that the disabled old man tried to perform in the committal hearing, on 28th June, 2010, the Queensland Court of Appeal gave it decision regarding that illegal arrest on that day of the disabled old man by parasite cop Rantala.  In clear dicta the Court of Appeal raised the spectre of the gross criminality involved in the whole matter

This day's transcript is one continuous file/page.  These anchors when listed will be listed in sequence.
The three days when witnesses have actually given evidence have been similarly summarised with "anchors" [aka markers/tags], and each appears thus:
  1. Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  2. Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  3. Day 3: 28th June, 2010
This case has international consequences, as this action by the Commonwealth Prosecutor, given that the disabled old man has been thrown out of his home by a corrupt judicial system of the magistrates and District Courts, is a disgusting reflection upon the judicial principle of Due Process, for any country in the world. This will make Australia the laughing stock of the international justice community.  So much more so as all this has been done with the full knowledge of the Australian Attorney General, Robert McClelland.

RussellMathewsEmailSignatureDRA

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
International Disability Rights Advocate
invoking
UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
& UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
See my RESOUNDING VICTORY 20th July, 2010 in
Qld Court of Appeal

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of
      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND
Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]

PHPincludesPlagiocephaly/includedSeeMenuNewPlagiocephalyLinks.php

SEE:  Overview of multiple criminal frauds of me by Douglas Porter & The University of Queensland:



 Menu: Chief Justice Paul deJersey _v_ Court of Appeal President Margaret McMurdo; Judicial War Supreme Court of Qld


Menu: HaigReport's Chief Justice Paul deJersey _v_ Court of Appeal President Margaret McMurdo; Judicial War Supreme Court of Qld:


  1. Index: Chief Justice Paul deJersey _v_ Court of Appeal President Margaret McMurdo; Judicial War Supreme Court of Qld:
  2. Who Had Magistrate Topsy-Turvy Wally Walter Harvey Ehrich Conceal Paul deJersey Corporation Synod Diocese Brisbane Armed Robbery:


 Menu: Corporations ON NOTICE! Russell Mathews' Corporate Governance Shareholder DECREE


Menu: HaigReport's Corporations ON NOTICE! Russell Mathews' Corporate Governance Shareholder DECREE:


  1. Index: Corporations ON NOTICE! Russell Mathews' Corporate Governance Shareholder DECREE:



 Menu: Woolworths/BigW: The Experience by a disabled customer, of Woolworth's BULLYING & BigW's MISLEADING & DECEPTIVE CONDUCT


Menu: HaigReport's Woolworths/BigW: The Experience by a disabled customer, of Woolworth's BULLYING & BigW's MISLEADING & DECEPTIVE CONDUCT :


  1. Index: Woolworth's Bullying Disabled Customers; BigW's Smart Arse Manager & Misleading & Deceptive Conduct:
  2. Hear Two Big W Smart Arses being Smart Arses: Everett McMillan, Store Manager, Big W, Garden City Mt Gravatt; & Nathan at Big W Online:
  3. Who is Woolworths Big W, Smart Arse Manager Everett McMillan?:
  4. How this matter may be developed by me: Stand for Election as a Non-Executive Director of Woolworths Ltd & more:
  5. Woolworths BigW Store Manager Everett McMillan Violates Woolworths Fanciful Code Of Conduct; So What Should His Staff Do:
  6. Disability Discrimination By Woolworths BigW Store Manager Everett McMillan, BigW Garden City, Mt Gravatt, Brisbane:
  7. OPEN LETTER: Boards of Directors & Management, Woolworths Ltd: Complacent Breach Consumer Law Abuse Patronize Ridicule Customers:
  8. ATTN: Woolworths Shareholders: Woolworths & BigW Train Managers TO Bully, Cheat, Argue & Belittle Disabled Customers:
  9. OPEN LETTER Julie Coates Director of BIG W & Grant O'Brien Managing Director and CEO, Woolworths Ltd:

  10. 7th May, 2012 OPEN LETTER Grant O’Brien Managing Director & CEO Woolworths:
includedMenuPriorWoolworthsBigW.php

This is the Menu regarding Disability Discrimination by Woolworths of a Disabled Old Man with two wee Assistance Dogs:

  1. * Webletter dated 8th January, 2007 re FIRST Woolworths ATTACK and unlawful Disability discrimination.
  2. * my_PSP email_to_Woolworths_dated_8th January, 2007 advising of web-letter URL
  3. * WOOLWORTHS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of email of 8th January,2007.
  4. * WebReport dated 27th October, 2007 re SECOND Woolworths ATTACK and unlawful Disability discrimination.
  5. * my_PSP email_to_Woolworths_dated_27th October, 2007 advising of web-letter URL
  6. * WOOLWORTHS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of email of 27th October, 2007.
  7. * Email thread start 1st November, 2007, of Russell Mathews and Woolworths
  8. * Woolworths email of 2nd November, 2007 requesting repeat advice of URL.
  9. * Reference to earlier ATTACK by Woolworths.
  10. * Our LEGAL ASSESSMENT of the INCOMPETENT CLAYTON UTZ REPORT.
  11. * The INCOMPETENT CLAYTON UTZ REPORT






Menu: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:


  1. Index: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial::

  2. Considerations: How To Do It: Procedure To Follow: Advice, From High Court Registry::
  3. High Court of Australia Fees, Charges, For Application for Special Leave To Appeal: CASH::
  4. Documents: Proforma; Examples; Actual; Completed: Application for Special Leave To Appeal; AccompanyingDocuments; Draft Notice Of Appeal; Summary Of Argument::
  5. Ridiculous Pedantics: High Court Registry Fail Logic::
  6. My Form 23: My Application For Special Leave To Appeal, High Court of Australia::
  7. My Form 24: Draft Notice Of Appeal; High Court Australia:
  8. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry deemed defective, deemed not comply with High Court Rules, deemed Attachment as 'entire Document':
  9. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry found okay as I cropped a bit more image:
  10. My Form XX: Affidavit Of Service on Respondent in High Court Australia; here CDPP:
  11. My Form XY: Affidavit Of Lodgement to Lower Court, here to Queensland Court of Appeal:
  12. Required Editable files to download in Word.DOC format:
  13. Required Editable files to download in OpenOffice.odt format [my preference]:


 Menu: LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD:

Menu: HaigReport's LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD::


See: the Menu: for Campbell Newman LNP catholic ustashi nazi troika fraud in Qld

  1. More FRAUD & CORRUPTION from catholic Campbell Newman LNP catholic Land FRAUD:
  2. Index: LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD:
  3. Open Letter 2010/08/04 Corrupt BCC Lord Mayor Campbell Newman LNP_FRAUD:
  4. OPEN LETTER: Tony Abbott, Electors in Dickson & Rural Independents  re Peter Dutton FRAUD & bye-election in Dickson:



 Menu: Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!


Menu:Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!:

  1.  Index: Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!:
  2. 5th December, 2011: Public Open Email: Kate Jones, State Member, Ashgrove: Re Campbell Newman Guilty Armed Robbery: Qld Court of Appeal has Reserved its Decision::
  3. Latest Up-Date001: Campbell Newman Fraud/Corruption BUT labor Endemic Corruption: I_Warned TheLiberal/LNP: Dumped/Sacked Judy Magub:
  4. Actual Email to Katter's Australian Party, Bob Katter & Aidan McLindon re Campbell Newman & Armed Robbery:
  5. Latest Update002: Labor Promotes Corruption: Campbell Newman Condones Corruption: Katter's Party - No Substance: Greens Labor in Disguise:
  6. The Queensland Party: Savior of Democracy in Qld: Restore Queensland's Upper House of Parliament, the Legislative Council:

 Menu:  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!

PHPincludesCourtOfAppealOnTrial/includedMenuCourtOfAppealOnTrial.php

Menu:  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!!!


  1. Don Dale Commissioner Margaret White Judicial Corruption Connection:
  2. Affidavit for Court of Appeal: Why CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe Unfit to be a Judge due Judicial Fraud when barrister:
  3. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form27:
  4. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form29:
  5. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form38 Adduce Evidence:
  6. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Affidavit Adduce Evidence:
  7. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Deny Qualified Privilege Form27:
  8. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Unlawful Order Disability Discrimination Apprehended Bias Form27:
  9. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Unlawful Order Disability Discrimination Apprehended Bias Form29:
  10. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJ Spurious Michael Shanahan Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form27:
  11.  Appeal 25th November, 2011: Police Fraud & Disability Discrimination by Magistrate Paul Kluck, District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien, & CDPP's Shane Hunter:
  12.  Outline of Argument & Submission asAt 31st October, 2011 Appeal Qld Police Fraud & Disability Discrimination by Magistrate Paul Kluck, District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien, & CDPP Shane Hunter:
  13. Respondent's CDPP's Shane Hunter's Lies & Dishonesty in Outline of Argument for CA201/2011 Qld Court of Appeal re Qld police Fraud & Disability Discrimination: Magistrate Paul Kluck; District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien KJOB:
  14. My Response to Lies & Dishonesty in Respondent's CDPP's Shane Hunter's Outline of Argument for CA201/2011 Qld Court of Appeal re Qld police Fraud & Disability Discrimination: Magistrate Paul Kluck; District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien KJOB:
  15. Transcript of My Oral Submission on the day, 25th November, 2011, in Qld Court of Appeal, against Qld police corrupt charges to coverup Qld Government Armed Robbery of disabled citizen, before Magistate Paul M Kluck:
  16. Court of Appeal Short Hearing 25th November, 2011; Reserved Decision; Possible Way Forward - Conclusive Evidence: Armed Robbery; International Scrutiny::
  17. Decision: 13th December, 2011 [James S Douglas & Margaret White], Court of Appeal division of Supreme Court of Queensland Mathews v Commissioner of Police [2011] QCA 368 CA No 201 of 2011: :
  18. My Future Actions, after the 13/12/11 Refusal by Qld Court of Appeal of my Appeal::
  19. My request to the Qld Attorney-General to Honour His Duty to Apply to the Court to Set Aside The Miscarriage of Justice, Vexatious Litigant Order:
  20. Decision 12th August,2005: Justice Margaret White Order Remove To Conceal Fraud By Brisbane City Council & Qld Government BS4337_2005_QSC05-222Mathews_v_Morgan_Ors:
  21. Is Justice Margaret White Using Her Judicial Immunity To REPEATEDLY_Conceal Crime By Her Favoured University Of Queensland to StealHome Of Disabled Old Man?:
  22. The Decision of Glory of the Queensland Court of Appeal:
  23. Transcript: 20050601 Magistrates Court Transcript Fraud by Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich, [aka Magistrate Topsy Turvey, al la Queensland Court of Appeal], John Peden, Ms Prasley & Police Sergeant Terence G IND:
  24. Transcript: 20081217 Magistrates Court Transcript of Fraud & Farce byMagistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich & Police Sgt Cox:
  25. Index: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!
  26. CORRUPT GOVERNMENT Judge Henry George Fryberg protects CORRUPT GOVERNMENT ARMED ROBBERS:
  27. Earlier Mentions of Henry George Fryberg: the former article explains a little extra:



 Menu: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:


Menu: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:


  1. Index: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial::

  2. Considerations: How To Do It: Procedure To Follow: Advice, From High Court Registry::
  3. High Court of Australia Fees, Charges, For Application for Special Leave To Appeal: CASH::
  4. Documents: Proforma; Examples; Actual; Completed: Application for Special Leave To Appeal; AccompanyingDocuments; Draft Notice Of Appeal; Summary Of Argument::
  5. Ridiculous Pedantics: High Court Registry Fail Logic::
  6. My Form 23: My Application For Special Leave To Appeal, High Court of Australia::
  7. My Form 24: Draft Notice Of Appeal; High Court Australia:
  8. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry deemed defective, deemed not comply with High Court Rules, deemed Attachment as 'entire Document':
  9. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry found okay as I cropped a bit more image:
  10. My Form XX: Affidavit Of Service on Respondent in High Court Australia; here CDPP:
  11. My Form XY: Affidavit Of Lodgement to Lower Court, here to Queensland Court of Appeal:
  12. Required Editable files to download in Word.DOC format:
  13. Required Editable files to download in OpenOffice.odt format [my preference]:


 Menu: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld: The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ:

Menu: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld:  The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ:

  1.  Index: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld: The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ: :
  2. The 2011 Admission, Enrolment Scandal: Professor Paul Greenfield & Prof Michael Keniger resign over Undeserved Special Privilege for Greenfield's Daughter in PreMed course::
  3. Skeletons in the cupboard for Maurie McNarn ex-director of the Australian Defence Intelligence Organisation [ADIO] re Torture Abuse Murder Prisoner Rendition Abu Graib:
includedMenuProofSappideenWalkerLister.php

Menu: Proof: University of Qld law school Fraud: by Carolyn Sappideen, Geoff deQ. Walker & Andrew Lister:

  1. Proof, in Carolyn Sappideen's own handwriting of her denying me Natural Justice: Denying me my RIGHT to be Heard
  2. Geoffrey de Q. Walker's signed ADMISSION of his LYING as to why he denied me permission to study law
  3. NEW Geoffrey_deQuincey Walker, Dean of TC Bierne School of Law @ The University of Queensland, Now, ex- AAT Deputy President - NSW, Fabricates Criminal Defamatory Scenario to harm Disabled Student, To Ingratiate Himself To Corrupt Judges:
  4. Specific Details of How & Why Carolyn Sappideen Unlawfully denied me, Russell Mathews, Due Process at The University of Queensland, & Ramifications Now for the University of Western Sydney [UWS]:
  5. UWS Law Professor Carolyn Sappideen bullies disabled student with ILLEGAL conduct; ILLEGAL even if the student was not disabled:

 Menu:  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

includedMenuDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

Menu: Qld District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

G'day, This menu will collect the various mentions on our websites of our process of exposing the fraud and corruption in the Public Sector of Queensland and the Commonwealth of Australia.  So much of this corruption is in the court, but we believe we have found a 'headland' of Truth and Honesty in the Queensland Courts.  Regardless, we can take these legal matters to higher courts including UN Committees in Geneva Switzerland.  We believe we have been able to make these inroads into the corruption in Queensland and Austalia because of our websites.
  1. Submission to District Court re DCJ Griffin Recuse SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon 19th November, 2012:
  2. Submission to District Court re SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon & My Flu; 12th November, 2012:
  3. 2nd November, 2012 Unrepresented Disabled Defendant Teaches Human Rights Law To District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien:
  4. Submission To District Court DCJA Kerry O'Brien 19th October, 2012 Re Disability Arrangements Unlawful Order Is Disability Discrimination:
  5. 4th Oct 2012 Transcript DCJ Michael Shanahan Prejudges Appeal Without Jurisdiction Or Evidence Eager Misrepresent My Application To Recuse:
  6. Submission to & Appearance in District Court 4th October, 2012 Motion DCJ Michael Shanahan Disqualify Himself As catholic Due Repeated catholic Fraud, Corruption, Attempted Murder; Patsy Wolfe, Quentin Bryce, Jeff Spender; Apprehended Bias a la Ustashi, IRA, nazi:
  7. See the Outcome of my Submission [above] to mention 4th October, 2012:
  8. Magistrate Marshall Davies, Eager To Convict Innocent Disabled Man Targeted By Corrupt Police To Please Corrupt Police:
  9. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 24th August, 2012, DCJA Kerry John O'Brien Rejects Immunity from Prosecution Due Qualified Privilege Confirms SetUp by Government including Courts:
  10. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 31st July, 2012, Russell Mathews: DCJA Kerry O'Brien's back, admits ignorance, seems determined to not ensure Fair Hearing; Due Process. :
  11. Submission & Appearance to District Court 24th August, 2012 Motion Permanent Stay Qualified Privilege Social Moral Duty Expose Australian Corruption in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  12. Why Chief District Court Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe Should Disqualify From Dealing with RussellMathews,in Any Matter:
  13. Why District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien Should Disqualify From Dealing with Russell Mathews in Any Matter:
  14. Submission & Appearance to District Court "Interim Review" 31st July, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; Re DUTY of Court to Determine & Provide Accommodation of my Special Needs for Due Process & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  15. Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick Has Less Risk of Violent Attack As REAL Julie Maree Dick Is BAIT:
  16. Perjury, Fraud & Corruption Connection to "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Marie Dick:
  17. DCJ Leanne Clare nee HURLEY: Murder Pig Snr Sgt Chris HURLEY Palm Island killer Mulrunji Doomadgee, Why as DPP would she not charge her NAMESAKE?:
  18. District Court Transcript: Mention, 15th June, 2012, Russell Mathews: DUMB Chief Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe's prior professional misconduct returning to haunt her. :
  19. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:
  20. Submission to District Court Mention 15th June, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church:
  21. Hearing 16th May, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  22. Hearing 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  23. Decision 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  24. The August, 2011 [20110814] Update: on Court Case Alleging Russell Mathews' Use of a Carriage Service [Broadband] to harass but actually Exposing Even More police & political Corruption in Australia:
  25. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law does CRIMINAL FAVOUR for OTHER ISRCL 'members'
  26. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law {ISRCL} uses ISRCL EVIL contact to TARGET DISABLED PERSON
  27. Listing of Members & Directors of the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law
  28. International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Director's CRIME to DEFRAUD DISABLED PERSON
  29. What is the future for the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law After CRIME Exposure?
  30. Who are the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law?
  31. Anthony Gett sycophant to International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Evil judges:
  32. Index: District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien [We may move this file later, out of the Emails Menu: Now we have.]
  33. Submission #0001:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  34. Submission #0002:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  35. Initial General Submission to District Court coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien AO for mention 28th January, 2011
  36. Submission #0003 in Registrar's Reference; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 10AM 4th March, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another:
  37. Submission #0004 in Sec222, Justices Act 1886; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 9:30AM 16th May, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another/Commissioner of Police:
  38. State Crime Operations Command Pigs Steven Geoffrey Bignell & Brendan Scott Read [Now of KPMG] Con the Dicks To Help Police Crime
  39. Queensland Police Keep Clever Dick John Edward Dick & the REAL Julie Maree Dick On Ice To Further Police Fraud
  40. Medical Report of 20100806 ex Dr Rob Moyle re Special Needs Accommodated by Keyboard and Computer = Disability AIDS
  41. Dr Bennett's report 31st March, 1998, listing FOUR separate episodes of head injuries sustained by me

Menu: of Emails: Registry, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court emails of 20101104 re District Court coram Kerry O'Brien: Jo Stonebridge Emails Ending with Smart Arse Email Ex Smart Arse Deputy Regisrar Kerri
  2. More 20101104_District Court coram Kerry O'Brien Emails Ex District Court Jo Stonebridge & Deputy Registrar Kerri
  3. Jo StoneBridge, Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court Bogus Email Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  4. Smart Arse Email From Smart Arse Deputy Registrar Kerri
  5. Email 20101122 Jo Stonebridge District Court Sheriff & Marshal
  6. Commonwealth DPP_Handed Up Copy Of My Submission For Attention Judge Kerry John Obrien
  7. Jo Stonebridge Advises That I_Am Required To Attend Next Mention
  8. Jo StoneBridge Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court gives Bogus Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  9. District Court Registry Parasites Impede Disabled Old Man's Communication With the Court
  10. Qld Public Sector Parasite Jo Stonebridge Deems My Commuication With Court 'Not Appropriate'
  11. Jo Stonebridge Now Advises There Is No Charge for Transcripts in Criminal Matters
  12. My Direct Reproach to Jo Stonebridge for Impeding My Communication with the Court
  13. 20101206 Ken Wells Executive Officer to the Director of Courts [WOW - Big Deal] Bogus information Pittance
  14. My Advice to District Court That I_will Publish on the Web due to Her Stuffing Me Around
  15. My Advice to District Court That District Court Lacks Jurisdiction
  16. My Advice to District Court That I_Will Communicate As A_Courtesy
  17. District Court Ken Wells Response To My Reproach of Jo Stonebridge Re Courteous
MenuTranscriptsDistrictCourtKeyyOBrien

Menu: Transcripts, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 22nd November, 2010, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  2. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 28th January, 2011, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  3. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:


PHPincludesProofSappideenWalkerLister/includedOverviewMultipleUniversityQueenslandDouglasPorterFrauds.php

Overview, Synopsis, or Summary of Public Sector Parasites Bullying specifically The University of Queensland & its previous registrar [for 22 years], Douglas Porter:

When one has a great amount of factual material to relate, one has to organize it so the reader can enter the narrative.  With the internet and Google and other search engines, that is unlikely to be at the "beginning", [if there is such a thing as a "beginning"].  Basically, what I have to do is to have various levels of narrative.  One level needs to have all the facts connected in detail.  No group of facts is a closed group, but rather, facts or aspects of one group of facts, relate to, or are identical to, facts or aspects of other groups.  As well, the reader/visitor does not want to read everything ever written.  Hence I need to have various levels of summary.  One level of summary will summarize the detailed facts.  Above that, is another level of summary that will summarize a number of summaries, according to common factors or relationships, in the level below.  Sometimes, when writing the detailed facts level, another aspect, or one or more of those facts, may require a detailed analysis.   Of course, the factual situation can be viewed from a number of perspectives.  Thankfully, Google et al, will index all of those.

Menus will tend to serve that role of a summary, but merely one summary or overview..  This text could be viewed as a Menu in a narrative.  This section will link to the various parts of our websites that are referenced from here.

There are basically FOUR episodes where the University of Queensland has cheated, defrauded and discriminated against me because I am disabled.  There exists a great amount of overlap between the episodes.  Of course, the outcome of each was that I was cheated and defrauded badly.   These facts I relate reflect badly upon The University of Queensland administration and Douglas Porter in particular.

Chronologically, from 1992 four main episodes are, the Law School, in 1993, 1994 and 1995 at least, the maths department and the EPSA faculty in particular Andrew Lister in 1997 to 2001, at least, then in 2003 - 2006 the dumb femi-nazi "Queen" Janine Schmidt was "chief" librarian at UQ attacked, defrauded and discriminated against me because I was disabled.   The Criminal culminating fraud by Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland was Porter's secretly orchestrating the defrauding me of my home, for the benefit of the University of Queensland and the UQ college called St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of UQ, when Porter was secretly  the Chair of the Council that ran St Johns College.

I am a mathematician.  My greatest skills are in maths.  I guess that could be because I have always had a writing disability, undiagnosed until circa 1993.  In school, all my written work was poorly written.  Hence, as teachers who mark work, see it as a chore and tedious job to be finished as quickly as possible, judge a work by how it looks or feels to them, and gives a subjective mark.  With maths, the teachers would see the correct answer, the correct diagrams so I would receive full marks, regularly.

I returned to The University of Queensland [UQ] in 1991 doing maths.  I did well. At that time, I had hassles with public sector parasites, lying parasites and police so decided to study law at UQ.  That began the episode of repeated occasions of my being attacked, cheated and defrauded by the law school by particular individuals within the law school and within the administration of The University of Queensland.   The University of Queensland was vicariously liable for that.  The next major episode occurred with the Maths department part of the Engineering, Physical science & Architecture "Super" faculty under the Executive Dean Andrew Lister.

/PHPincludesCorruptBrisbaneDiocese/includedMenuJohnMorgan.php Menu: CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan, @ St Johns College, UQ:
  1. PROOF of the 2001 FRAUD  by CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Morgan
  2. Directory of links about Criminal parasite priest Rev Canon John Leslie Morgan:
  3. Directory of Anglican CORRUPTION matters:
  4. Anglicans conspire to steal the home of disabled with aid of political & judicial corruption
  5. PROOF of another instance that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is yet again a LIAR
  6. PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is Incompetent
  7. PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is a BULLY
  8. Email from Morgan showing he is a silly malicious ratbag 
  9. Is this Primate Aspinall's BUSINESS ACUMEN?
  10. Anglican priest bullies DISABLED Neighbour to STEAL his HOME.
  11. Yet another Morgan LIE that neither he nor St John's College had any documents about me..  I had to push it all the way to the Privacy Commission, who Morgan was repeatedly ignoring.  He really thinks he is god.
  12. Anglican CORRUPTION EXPOSED
  13. Another Morgan LIE
  14. One of the many examples of MONEY & FRAUD being motivator of 'Rev' John Morgan
  15. $1Mill+ FRAUD- St Johns College & University of Queensland
  16. Australian CRIMINAL LAW Journal ISSN: 1321-6562 26 February, 2007. Issue #: 200702
  17. FRAUD on Uni Students: $1,500 RENT PER WEEK, for an ASBESTOS RIDDEN dump.
  18. Is FRAUD the answer for Anglican return on investment?

http://HaigReport.com/aaaaMenu/Menus/includedMenuDefraudingMeMyHome.php

LinkToAspinallInMorganPanel This Profile Panel re the dumb parasitic anglican priest John Leslie Morgan, links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud by archbishop Phillip Aspinall of a vulnerable disabled guy where anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall headed up the scheme to steal the home of this vulnerable disabled guy.

http://HaigReport.com/Photos/100_0663_20070120CanonRevProfDrJohnLeslieMorganWardenStJohnsCollegeUniversityQueenslandHidingBehindToiletRolls_cr30pc.jpg
About this despicable life form , Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, now Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.

This photo was taken in a supermarket, on the 20th January, 2007 at 4:54PM Brisbane, Australia time, when Morgan was attemting to not be photographed by hiding behind some toilet rolls.

This individual is evil and he escapes scrutiny as he is a "priest".  Over time I have collected much evidence about his evil and criminal actions and published it.  I have assembled that into a menu.  I now include that menu here.
/PHPincludesCorruptBrisbaneDiocese/includedMenuJohnMorgan.php Menu: CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan, @ St Johns College, UQ:
*  PROOF of the 2001 FRAUD  by CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Morgan
*  Directory of links about Criminal parasite priest Rev Canon John Leslie Morgan:
*  Directory of Anglican CORRUPTION matters:
*  Anglicans conspire to steal the home of disabled with aid of political & judicial corruption
*  PROOF of another instance that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is yet again a LIAR
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is Incompetent
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is a BULLY
*  Email from Morgan showing he is a silly malicious ratbag 
*  Is this Primate Aspinall's BUSINESS ACUMEN?
*  Anglican priest bullies DISABLED Neighbour to STEAL his HOME.
*  Yet another Morgan LIE that neither he nor St John's College had any documents about me..  I had to push it all the way to the Privacy Commission, who Morgan was repeatedly ignoring.  He really thinks he is god.
*  Anglican CORRUPTION EXPOSED
*  Another Morgan LIE
*  One of the many examples of MONEY & FRAUD being motivator of 'Rev' John Morgan
*  $1Mill+ FRAUD- St Johns College & University of Queensland
*  Australian CRIMINAL LAW Journal ISSN: 1321-6562 26 February, 2007. Issue #: 200702
*  FRAUD on Uni Students: $1,500 RENT PER WEEK, for an ASBESTOS RIDDEN dump.
*  Is FRAUD the answer for Anglican return on investment?

We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland. 


 Menu: LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD:

Menu: HaigReport's LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD::


See: the Menu: for Campbell Newman LNP catholic ustashi nazi troika fraud in Qld

  1. More FRAUD & CORRUPTION from catholic Campbell Newman LNP catholic Land FRAUD:
  2. Index: LNP Corrupt LordMayor Campbell Newman FRAUD:
  3. Open Letter 2010/08/04 Corrupt BCC Lord Mayor Campbell Newman LNP_FRAUD:
  4. OPEN LETTER: Tony Abbott, Electors in Dickson & Rural Independents  re Peter Dutton FRAUD & bye-election in Dickson:



 Menu: Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!


Menu:Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!:

  1.  Index: Queensland State Election 2012: Liberal, labor, National, LNP, Katter's Australia Party: Corruption, Fraud &/or Incompetence: Anna Bligh; Campbell Newman; Bob Katter, Aidan McLindon!!:
  2. 5th December, 2011: Public Open Email: Kate Jones, State Member, Ashgrove: Re Campbell Newman Guilty Armed Robbery: Qld Court of Appeal has Reserved its Decision::
  3. Latest Up-Date001: Campbell Newman Fraud/Corruption BUT labor Endemic Corruption: I_Warned TheLiberal/LNP: Dumped/Sacked Judy Magub:
  4. Actual Email to Katter's Australian Party, Bob Katter & Aidan McLindon re Campbell Newman & Armed Robbery:
  5. Latest Update002: Labor Promotes Corruption: Campbell Newman Condones Corruption: Katter's Party - No Substance: Greens Labor in Disguise:
  6. The Queensland Party: Savior of Democracy in Qld: Restore Queensland's Upper House of Parliament, the Legislative Council:

 Menu:  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!

PHPincludesCourtOfAppealOnTrial/includedMenuCourtOfAppealOnTrial.php

Menu:  Latest Update: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!!!


  1. Don Dale Commissioner Margaret White Judicial Corruption Connection:
  2. Affidavit for Court of Appeal: Why CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe Unfit to be a Judge due Judicial Fraud when barrister:
  3. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form27:
  4. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form29:
  5. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form38 Adduce Evidence:
  6. Appeal to Court of Appeal CDCJ Patsy Wolfe Deny Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Affidavit Adduce Evidence:
  7. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Deny Qualified Privilege Form27:
  8. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Unlawful Order Disability Discrimination Apprehended Bias Form27:
  9. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJA Kerry O'Brien Unlawful Order Disability Discrimination Apprehended Bias Form29:
  10. Appeal to Court of Appeal DCJ Spurious Michael Shanahan Refuse Recuse Apprehended Bias Form27:
  11.  Appeal 25th November, 2011: Police Fraud & Disability Discrimination by Magistrate Paul Kluck, District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien, & CDPP's Shane Hunter:
  12.  Outline of Argument & Submission asAt 31st October, 2011 Appeal Qld Police Fraud & Disability Discrimination by Magistrate Paul Kluck, District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien, & CDPP Shane Hunter:
  13. Respondent's CDPP's Shane Hunter's Lies & Dishonesty in Outline of Argument for CA201/2011 Qld Court of Appeal re Qld police Fraud & Disability Discrimination: Magistrate Paul Kluck; District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien KJOB:
  14. My Response to Lies & Dishonesty in Respondent's CDPP's Shane Hunter's Outline of Argument for CA201/2011 Qld Court of Appeal re Qld police Fraud & Disability Discrimination: Magistrate Paul Kluck; District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien KJOB:
  15. Transcript of My Oral Submission on the day, 25th November, 2011, in Qld Court of Appeal, against Qld police corrupt charges to coverup Qld Government Armed Robbery of disabled citizen, before Magistate Paul M Kluck:
  16. Court of Appeal Short Hearing 25th November, 2011; Reserved Decision; Possible Way Forward - Conclusive Evidence: Armed Robbery; International Scrutiny::
  17. Decision: 13th December, 2011 [James S Douglas & Margaret White], Court of Appeal division of Supreme Court of Queensland Mathews v Commissioner of Police [2011] QCA 368 CA No 201 of 2011: :
  18. My Future Actions, after the 13/12/11 Refusal by Qld Court of Appeal of my Appeal::
  19. My request to the Qld Attorney-General to Honour His Duty to Apply to the Court to Set Aside The Miscarriage of Justice, Vexatious Litigant Order:
  20. Decision 12th August,2005: Justice Margaret White Order Remove To Conceal Fraud By Brisbane City Council & Qld Government BS4337_2005_QSC05-222Mathews_v_Morgan_Ors:
  21. Is Justice Margaret White Using Her Judicial Immunity To REPEATEDLY_Conceal Crime By Her Favoured University Of Queensland to StealHome Of Disabled Old Man?:
  22. The Decision of Glory of the Queensland Court of Appeal:
  23. Transcript: 20050601 Magistrates Court Transcript Fraud by Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich, [aka Magistrate Topsy Turvey, al la Queensland Court of Appeal], John Peden, Ms Prasley & Police Sergeant Terence G IND:
  24. Transcript: 20081217 Magistrates Court Transcript of Fraud & Farce byMagistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich & Police Sgt Cox:
  25. Index: Queensland's Court of Appeal: ON TRIAL!!
  26. CORRUPT GOVERNMENT Judge Henry George Fryberg protects CORRUPT GOVERNMENT ARMED ROBBERS:
  27. Earlier Mentions of Henry George Fryberg: the former article explains a little extra:



 Menu: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:


Menu: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial:


  1. Index: HaigReport's High Court of Australia on Trial::

  2. Considerations: How To Do It: Procedure To Follow: Advice, From High Court Registry::
  3. High Court of Australia Fees, Charges, For Application for Special Leave To Appeal: CASH::
  4. Documents: Proforma; Examples; Actual; Completed: Application for Special Leave To Appeal; AccompanyingDocuments; Draft Notice Of Appeal; Summary Of Argument::
  5. Ridiculous Pedantics: High Court Registry Fail Logic::
  6. My Form 23: My Application For Special Leave To Appeal, High Court of Australia::
  7. My Form 24: Draft Notice Of Appeal; High Court Australia:
  8. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry deemed defective, deemed not comply with High Court Rules, deemed Attachment as 'entire Document':
  9. My 'Summary Of Argument' that the High Court Registry found okay as I cropped a bit more image:
  10. My Form XX: Affidavit Of Service on Respondent in High Court Australia; here CDPP:
  11. My Form XY: Affidavit Of Lodgement to Lower Court, here to Queensland Court of Appeal:
  12. Required Editable files to download in Word.DOC format:
  13. Required Editable files to download in OpenOffice.odt format [my preference]:


 Menu: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld: The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ:

Menu: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld:  The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ:

  1.  Index: Latest Update: Many New Corruption Scandals at The University Of Qld: The Cradle of Qld Official, Judicial & Government Corruption: UQ: :
  2. The 2011 Admission, Enrolment Scandal: Professor Paul Greenfield & Prof Michael Keniger resign over Undeserved Special Privilege for Greenfield's Daughter in PreMed course::
  3. Skeletons in the cupboard for Maurie McNarn ex-director of the Australian Defence Intelligence Organisation [ADIO] re Torture Abuse Murder Prisoner Rendition Abu Graib:
includedMenuProofSappideenWalkerLister.php

Menu: Proof: University of Qld law school Fraud: by Carolyn Sappideen, Geoff deQ. Walker & Andrew Lister:

  1. Proof, in Carolyn Sappideen's own handwriting of her denying me Natural Justice: Denying me my RIGHT to be Heard
  2. Geoffrey de Q. Walker's signed ADMISSION of his LYING as to why he denied me permission to study law
  3. NEW Geoffrey_deQuincey Walker, Dean of TC Bierne School of Law @ The University of Queensland, Now, ex- AAT Deputy President - NSW, Fabricates Criminal Defamatory Scenario to harm Disabled Student, To Ingratiate Himself To Corrupt Judges:
  4. Specific Details of How & Why Carolyn Sappideen Unlawfully denied me, Russell Mathews, Due Process at The University of Queensland, & Ramifications Now for the University of Western Sydney [UWS]:
  5. UWS Law Professor Carolyn Sappideen bullies disabled student with ILLEGAL conduct; ILLEGAL even if the student was not disabled:

 Menu:  Latest Update: So why is   District Court Judge Administrator Kerry John O'Brien,   who is Second Only To Corrupt Patsy Mary Wolfe,   So Determined To Control My Appearances in the District Court 

includedMenuDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

Menu: Qld District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

G'day, This menu will collect the various mentions on our websites of our process of exposing the fraud and corruption in the Public Sector of Queensland and the Commonwealth of Australia.  So much of this corruption is in the court, but we believe we have found a 'headland' of Truth and Honesty in the Queensland Courts.  Regardless, we can take these legal matters to higher courts including UN Committees in Geneva Switzerland.  We believe we have been able to make these inroads into the corruption in Queensland and Austalia because of our websites.
  1. Submission to District Court re DCJ Griffin Recuse SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon 19th November, 2012:
  2. Submission to District Court re SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon & My Flu; 12th November, 2012:
  3. 2nd November, 2012 Unrepresented Disabled Defendant Teaches Human Rights Law To District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien:
  4. Submission To District Court DCJA Kerry O'Brien 19th October, 2012 Re Disability Arrangements Unlawful Order Is Disability Discrimination:
  5. 4th Oct 2012 Transcript DCJ Michael Shanahan Prejudges Appeal Without Jurisdiction Or Evidence Eager Misrepresent My Application To Recuse:
  6. Submission to & Appearance in District Court 4th October, 2012 Motion DCJ Michael Shanahan Disqualify Himself As catholic Due Repeated catholic Fraud, Corruption, Attempted Murder; Patsy Wolfe, Quentin Bryce, Jeff Spender; Apprehended Bias a la Ustashi, IRA, nazi:
  7. See the Outcome of my Submission [above] to mention 4th October, 2012:
  8. Magistrate Marshall Davies, Eager To Convict Innocent Disabled Man Targeted By Corrupt Police To Please Corrupt Police:
  9. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 24th August, 2012, DCJA Kerry John O'Brien Rejects Immunity from Prosecution Due Qualified Privilege Confirms SetUp by Government including Courts:
  10. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 31st July, 2012, Russell Mathews: DCJA Kerry O'Brien's back, admits ignorance, seems determined to not ensure Fair Hearing; Due Process. :
  11. Submission & Appearance to District Court 24th August, 2012 Motion Permanent Stay Qualified Privilege Social Moral Duty Expose Australian Corruption in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  12. Why Chief District Court Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe Should Disqualify From Dealing with RussellMathews,in Any Matter:
  13. Why District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien Should Disqualify From Dealing with Russell Mathews in Any Matter:
  14. Submission & Appearance to District Court "Interim Review" 31st July, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; Re DUTY of Court to Determine & Provide Accommodation of my Special Needs for Due Process & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  15. Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick Has Less Risk of Violent Attack As REAL Julie Maree Dick Is BAIT:
  16. Perjury, Fraud & Corruption Connection to "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Marie Dick:
  17. DCJ Leanne Clare nee HURLEY: Murder Pig Snr Sgt Chris HURLEY Palm Island killer Mulrunji Doomadgee, Why as DPP would she not charge her NAMESAKE?:
  18. District Court Transcript: Mention, 15th June, 2012, Russell Mathews: DUMB Chief Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe's prior professional misconduct returning to haunt her. :
  19. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:
  20. Submission to District Court Mention 15th June, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church:
  21. Hearing 16th May, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  22. Hearing 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  23. Decision 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  24. The August, 2011 [20110814] Update: on Court Case Alleging Russell Mathews' Use of a Carriage Service [Broadband] to harass but actually Exposing Even More police & political Corruption in Australia:
  25. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law does CRIMINAL FAVOUR for OTHER ISRCL 'members'
  26. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law {ISRCL} uses ISRCL EVIL contact to TARGET DISABLED PERSON
  27. Listing of Members & Directors of the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law
  28. International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Director's CRIME to DEFRAUD DISABLED PERSON
  29. What is the future for the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law After CRIME Exposure?
  30. Who are the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law?
  31. Anthony Gett sycophant to International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Evil judges:
  32. Index: District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien [We may move this file later, out of the Emails Menu: Now we have.]
  33. Submission #0001:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  34. Submission #0002:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  35. Initial General Submission to District Court coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien AO for mention 28th January, 2011
  36. Submission #0003 in Registrar's Reference; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 10AM 4th March, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another:
  37. Submission #0004 in Sec222, Justices Act 1886; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 9:30AM 16th May, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another/Commissioner of Police:
  38. State Crime Operations Command Pigs Steven Geoffrey Bignell & Brendan Scott Read [Now of KPMG] Con the Dicks To Help Police Crime
  39. Queensland Police Keep Clever Dick John Edward Dick & the REAL Julie Maree Dick On Ice To Further Police Fraud
  40. Medical Report of 20100806 ex Dr Rob Moyle re Special Needs Accommodated by Keyboard and Computer = Disability AIDS
  41. Dr Bennett's report 31st March, 1998, listing FOUR separate episodes of head injuries sustained by me

Menu: of Emails: Registry, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court emails of 20101104 re District Court coram Kerry O'Brien: Jo Stonebridge Emails Ending with Smart Arse Email Ex Smart Arse Deputy Regisrar Kerri
  2. More 20101104_District Court coram Kerry O'Brien Emails Ex District Court Jo Stonebridge & Deputy Registrar Kerri
  3. Jo StoneBridge, Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court Bogus Email Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  4. Smart Arse Email From Smart Arse Deputy Registrar Kerri
  5. Email 20101122 Jo Stonebridge District Court Sheriff & Marshal
  6. Commonwealth DPP_Handed Up Copy Of My Submission For Attention Judge Kerry John Obrien
  7. Jo Stonebridge Advises That I_Am Required To Attend Next Mention
  8. Jo StoneBridge Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court gives Bogus Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  9. District Court Registry Parasites Impede Disabled Old Man's Communication With the Court
  10. Qld Public Sector Parasite Jo Stonebridge Deems My Commuication With Court 'Not Appropriate'
  11. Jo Stonebridge Now Advises There Is No Charge for Transcripts in Criminal Matters
  12. My Direct Reproach to Jo Stonebridge for Impeding My Communication with the Court
  13. 20101206 Ken Wells Executive Officer to the Director of Courts [WOW - Big Deal] Bogus information Pittance
  14. My Advice to District Court That I_will Publish on the Web due to Her Stuffing Me Around
  15. My Advice to District Court That District Court Lacks Jurisdiction
  16. My Advice to District Court That I_Will Communicate As A_Courtesy
  17. District Court Ken Wells Response To My Reproach of Jo Stonebridge Re Courteous
MenuTranscriptsDistrictCourtKeyyOBrien

Menu: Transcripts, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 22nd November, 2010, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  2. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 28th January, 2011, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  3. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:


PHPincludesProofSappideenWalkerLister/includedOverviewMultipleUniversityQueenslandDouglasPorterFrauds.php

Overview, Synopsis, or Summary of Public Sector Parasites Bullying specifically The University of Queensland & its previous registrar [for 22 years], Douglas Porter:

When one has a great amount of factual material to relate, one has to organize it so the reader can enter the narrative.  With the internet and Google and other search engines, that is unlikely to be at the "beginning", [if there is such a thing as a "beginning"].  Basically, what I have to do is to have various levels of narrative.  One level needs to have all the facts connected in detail.  No group of facts is a closed group, but rather, facts or aspects of one group of facts, relate to, or are identical to, facts or aspects of other groups.  As well, the reader/visitor does not want to read everything ever written.  Hence I need to have various levels of summary.  One level of summary will summarize the detailed facts.  Above that, is another level of summary that will summarize a number of summaries, according to common factors or relationships, in the level below.  Sometimes, when writing the detailed facts level, another aspect, or one or more of those facts, may require a detailed analysis.   Of course, the factual situation can be viewed from a number of perspectives.  Thankfully, Google et al, will index all of those.

Menus will tend to serve that role of a summary, but merely one summary or overview..  This text could be viewed as a Menu in a narrative.  This section will link to the various parts of our websites that are referenced from here.

There are basically FOUR episodes where the University of Queensland has cheated, defrauded and discriminated against me because I am disabled.  There exists a great amount of overlap between the episodes.  Of course, the outcome of each was that I was cheated and defrauded badly.   These facts I relate reflect badly upon The University of Queensland administration and Douglas Porter in particular.

Chronologically, from 1992 four main episodes are, the Law School, in 1993, 1994 and 1995 at least, the maths department and the EPSA faculty in particular Andrew Lister in 1997 to 2001, at least, then in 2003 - 2006 the dumb femi-nazi "Queen" Janine Schmidt was "chief" librarian at UQ attacked, defrauded and discriminated against me because I was disabled.   The Criminal culminating fraud by Douglas Porter and The University of Queensland was Porter's secretly orchestrating the defrauding me of my home, for the benefit of the University of Queensland and the UQ college called St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of UQ, when Porter was secretly  the Chair of the Council that ran St Johns College.

I am a mathematician.  My greatest skills are in maths.  I guess that could be because I have always had a writing disability, undiagnosed until circa 1993.  In school, all my written work was poorly written.  Hence, as teachers who mark work, see it as a chore and tedious job to be finished as quickly as possible, judge a work by how it looks or feels to them, and gives a subjective mark.  With maths, the teachers would see the correct answer, the correct diagrams so I would receive full marks, regularly.

I returned to The University of Queensland [UQ] in 1991 doing maths.  I did well. At that time, I had hassles with public sector parasites, lying parasites and police so decided to study law at UQ.  That began the episode of repeated occasions of my being attacked, cheated and defrauded by the law school by particular individuals within the law school and within the administration of The University of Queensland.   The University of Queensland was vicariously liable for that.  The next major episode occurred with the Maths department part of the Engineering, Physical science & Architecture "Super" faculty under the Executive Dean Andrew Lister.

New Document New Document

Collected Menus Below for the earlier coverage of a number of instances of the Top Down complete systemic corruption at The University of Qld:

includedMenuProofSappideenWalkerLister.php

Menu: Proof: University of Qld law school Fraud: by Carolyn Sappideen, Geoff deQ. Walker & Andrew Lister:

  1. Proof, in Carolyn Sappideen's own handwriting of her denying me Natural Justice: Denying me my RIGHT to be Heard
  2. Geoffrey de Q. Walker's signed ADMISSION of his LYING as to why he denied me permission to study law
  3. NEW Geoffrey_deQuincey Walker, Dean of TC Bierne School of Law @ The University of Queensland, Now, ex- AAT Deputy President - NSW, Fabricates Criminal Defamatory Scenario to harm Disabled Student, To Ingratiate Himself To Corrupt Judges:
  4. Specific Details of How & Why Carolyn Sappideen Unlawfully denied me, Russell Mathews, Due Process at The University of Queensland, & Ramifications Now for the University of Western Sydney [UWS]:
  5. UWS Law Professor Carolyn Sappideen bullies disabled student with ILLEGAL conduct; ILLEGAL even if the student was not disabled:
PHPincludesPlagiocephaly/includedSeeMenuNewPlagiocephalyLinks.php

SEE:  Overview of multiple criminal frauds of me by Douglas Porter & The University of Queensland:

/PHPincludesBewareAvoidMathsDeptUQ/includedMenuBewareAvoidMathsDeptUQ.php

Menu: Beware, & Avoid Maths Dept University of Qld:<

  1. See the DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE FROM UQ files ProofBurrageGatesListerPorterFraudMathsDeptUQ
  2. See the DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE FROM UQ files ProofSappideenWalkerListerFraudLawUQ
  3. Index: Reasons to Beware, & Avoid the Mathematics Department @ The University of Queensland:
  4. Dr Elizabeth J Billington, Evil, Wicked but Dumb Fraud Bitch Whore Act  & "I Don't Have To Tell You".
  5. View Documentary Evidence of Whose Fraudulent Directions & Instructions Elizabeth Billington obeyed:
  6. Dr Kevin E. Gates; MN475 Fraud by Evil Criminal Bludger Liar Cheat & Parasite:
  7. MN475 Fraud & Corruption: Question 4.7.7:
  8. Professor Kevin Burrage; Backed The Wrong Side: the Evil, Criminal, Bludger, Liar, Cheat & Parasite Side:
  9. Professor Kevin Burrage; Now At Oxford University, in UK; New College & QUT Brisbane:
  10. Professor Kevin Burrage; Illegally Discriminated Against Disabled Student:
  11. Professor Kevin Burrage; Research Fraud, by Evil, Criminal, Bludger, Liar, Cheat & Parasite:
  12. University of Queensland Senate Student Appeals Committee [UQSSAC] [SSAC]:
  13. Douglas Porter, Evil Wicked Fraudster with his Corrupt, Criminal Nature On Display yet Again:
  14. Trevor J. Grigg, of Carisgold Pty Ltd: A Career of Evil Wicked Bully, Cheat, & Parasite:
  15. Andrew Lister: A Career as an Evil Wicked Bully, Cheat, & Parasite, One of Hay's "Seven Sycophants":
  16. View Documentary Evidence of Where Andrew Lister was previously Acting against the Interests of Russell Mathews
PHPincludesPlagiocephaly/includedSeeMenuNewPlagiocephalyLinks.php

SEE:  Overview of multiple criminal frauds of me by Douglas Porter & The University of Queensland:

The 'Queen' Janine Schmidt, University of Queensland LAND FRAUD MENU:
Menu: NaziBully 'Queen' Janine SCHMIDT on our HaigReport 'Retribution' Website:
  1. NaziBully 'Queen' Janine SCHMIDT on our HaigReport RETRIBUTION Website
  2. Mrs Linda Bird, another University of Queensland Post-Menopausal FAT FRAUDSTER, Public Sector Parasite
  3. 'Queen' Janine's mental minion Catherine Ann Geraghty finds lying, cheating and bullying the disabled, EXCITING
  4. Ann Tilbury is GUILTY of Criminal Assault on an Officer of the Court who was Serving her with a Summons:
  5. See the TILBURY connection to the Rhodes Scholarship BLOOD MONEY Scandal
  6. See UQ Criminal Richard Zebrovius Admission of Dangerous Driving for Douglas Porter fraud
Menu for Our New Dedicated 'Queen' Janine Schmidt Website
  1. Home Page for Our New Dedicated 'Queen' Janine Schmidt Website
  2. 'Queen' Janine Schmidt Email of 20090909 Resign, Sack or Leave Decision as Trenholme Director of Libraries, McGill Uni, Montreal, Canada.
  3. Consequences for 'Queen' Janine Schmidt, of her NAZI BULLYING  of me, and the INTERNET.
  4. Page for Links to other mentions, BY OTHER PUBLISHERS, of the 'Queen' Janine Schmidt, NAZI BULLY, on the Internet.
Menu for Our Earlier Mentions and Evidence of actions of NAZI BULLY 'Queen' Janine Schmidt at The University of Queensland: [& this Menu will go in each of these]
  1. A little early history of this Nazi Bully 'Queen' Janine Schmidt
  2. The EARLY Documented Advice [by FOI] from Registrar that I am disabled and Legally entitled to be accompanied by my Assistance dogs:
  3. Blog [now closed] entries from a number of Sources of this 'Queen' Janine's NAZI BULLY ACTIONS.
  4. An UPDATE on the early history of this Nazi Bully 'Queen' Janine Schmidt
  5. 'Queen' Janine Schmidt Had her Minion report my Assistance Dogs, so, to have them abducted from outside the Library, after 'Queen' Janine had prevented their accompanying me in the library.
  6. The Registrar's Secretary, "TilBULLY" was happy to disobey her boss to please 'Queen' Janine, & RECORDED IT.
  7. The email to Schmidt from her boss, the Registrar of The University of Queensland. re the LAW showing 'Queen' Janine Schmidt's continued intransigence, even after two years.
  8. Online Version: [3Mb]  PRINT JOURNAL: The University of Queensland Alumni Journal ISSN: 1834-660X 23 April, 2007. Issue #: 200701
includedMenuDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

Menu: Qld District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

G'day, This menu will collect the various mentions on our websites of our process of exposing the fraud and corruption in the Public Sector of Queensland and the Commonwealth of Australia.  So much of this corruption is in the court, but we believe we have found a 'headland' of Truth and Honesty in the Queensland Courts.  Regardless, we can take these legal matters to higher courts including UN Committees in Geneva Switzerland.  We believe we have been able to make these inroads into the corruption in Queensland and Austalia because of our websites.
  1. Submission to District Court re DCJ Griffin Recuse SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon 19th November, 2012:
  2. Submission to District Court re SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon & My Flu; 12th November, 2012:
  3. 2nd November, 2012 Unrepresented Disabled Defendant Teaches Human Rights Law To District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien:
  4. Submission To District Court DCJA Kerry O'Brien 19th October, 2012 Re Disability Arrangements Unlawful Order Is Disability Discrimination:
  5. 4th Oct 2012 Transcript DCJ Michael Shanahan Prejudges Appeal Without Jurisdiction Or Evidence Eager Misrepresent My Application To Recuse:
  6. Submission to & Appearance in District Court 4th October, 2012 Motion DCJ Michael Shanahan Disqualify Himself As catholic Due Repeated catholic Fraud, Corruption, Attempted Murder; Patsy Wolfe, Quentin Bryce, Jeff Spender; Apprehended Bias a la Ustashi, IRA, nazi:
  7. See the Outcome of my Submission [above] to mention 4th October, 2012:
  8. Magistrate Marshall Davies, Eager To Convict Innocent Disabled Man Targeted By Corrupt Police To Please Corrupt Police:
  9. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 24th August, 2012, DCJA Kerry John O'Brien Rejects Immunity from Prosecution Due Qualified Privilege Confirms SetUp by Government including Courts:
  10. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 31st July, 2012, Russell Mathews: DCJA Kerry O'Brien's back, admits ignorance, seems determined to not ensure Fair Hearing; Due Process. :
  11. Submission & Appearance to District Court 24th August, 2012 Motion Permanent Stay Qualified Privilege Social Moral Duty Expose Australian Corruption in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  12. Why Chief District Court Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe Should Disqualify From Dealing with RussellMathews,in Any Matter:
  13. Why District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien Should Disqualify From Dealing with Russell Mathews in Any Matter:
  14. Submission & Appearance to District Court "Interim Review" 31st July, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; Re DUTY of Court to Determine & Provide Accommodation of my Special Needs for Due Process & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  15. Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick Has Less Risk of Violent Attack As REAL Julie Maree Dick Is BAIT:
  16. Perjury, Fraud & Corruption Connection to "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Marie Dick:
  17. DCJ Leanne Clare nee HURLEY: Murder Pig Snr Sgt Chris HURLEY Palm Island killer Mulrunji Doomadgee, Why as DPP would she not charge her NAMESAKE?:
  18. District Court Transcript: Mention, 15th June, 2012, Russell Mathews: DUMB Chief Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe's prior professional misconduct returning to haunt her. :
  19. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:
  20. Submission to District Court Mention 15th June, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church:
  21. Hearing 16th May, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  22. Hearing 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  23. Decision 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  24. The August, 2011 [20110814] Update: on Court Case Alleging Russell Mathews' Use of a Carriage Service [Broadband] to harass but actually Exposing Even More police & political Corruption in Australia:
  25. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law does CRIMINAL FAVOUR for OTHER ISRCL 'members'
  26. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law {ISRCL} uses ISRCL EVIL contact to TARGET DISABLED PERSON
  27. Listing of Members & Directors of the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law
  28. International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Director's CRIME to DEFRAUD DISABLED PERSON
  29. What is the future for the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law After CRIME Exposure?
  30. Who are the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law?
  31. Anthony Gett sycophant to International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Evil judges:
  32. Index: District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien [We may move this file later, out of the Emails Menu: Now we have.]
  33. Submission #0001:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  34. Submission #0002:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  35. Initial General Submission to District Court coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien AO for mention 28th January, 2011
  36. Submission #0003 in Registrar's Reference; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 10AM 4th March, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another:
  37. Submission #0004 in Sec222, Justices Act 1886; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 9:30AM 16th May, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another/Commissioner of Police:
  38. State Crime Operations Command Pigs Steven Geoffrey Bignell & Brendan Scott Read [Now of KPMG] Con the Dicks To Help Police Crime
  39. Queensland Police Keep Clever Dick John Edward Dick & the REAL Julie Maree Dick On Ice To Further Police Fraud
  40. Medical Report of 20100806 ex Dr Rob Moyle re Special Needs Accommodated by Keyboard and Computer = Disability AIDS
  41. Dr Bennett's report 31st March, 1998, listing FOUR separate episodes of head injuries sustained by me
PHPincludesPlagiocephaly/includedSeeMenuNewPlagiocephalyLinks.php

SEE:  Overview of multiple criminal frauds of me by Douglas Porter & The University of Queensland:

Menu: of Emails: Registry, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court emails of 20101104 re District Court coram Kerry O'Brien: Jo Stonebridge Emails Ending with Smart Arse Email Ex Smart Arse Deputy Regisrar Kerri
  2. More 20101104_District Court coram Kerry O'Brien Emails Ex District Court Jo Stonebridge & Deputy Registrar Kerri
  3. Jo StoneBridge, Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court Bogus Email Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  4. Smart Arse Email From Smart Arse Deputy Registrar Kerri
  5. Email 20101122 Jo Stonebridge District Court Sheriff & Marshal
  6. Commonwealth DPP_Handed Up Copy Of My Submission For Attention Judge Kerry John Obrien
  7. Jo Stonebridge Advises That I_Am Required To Attend Next Mention
  8. Jo StoneBridge Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court gives Bogus Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  9. District Court Registry Parasites Impede Disabled Old Man's Communication With the Court
  10. Qld Public Sector Parasite Jo Stonebridge Deems My Commuication With Court 'Not Appropriate'
  11. Jo Stonebridge Now Advises There Is No Charge for Transcripts in Criminal Matters
  12. My Direct Reproach to Jo Stonebridge for Impeding My Communication with the Court
  13. 20101206 Ken Wells Executive Officer to the Director of Courts [WOW - Big Deal] Bogus information Pittance
  14. My Advice to District Court That I_will Publish on the Web due to Her Stuffing Me Around
  15. My Advice to District Court That District Court Lacks Jurisdiction
  16. My Advice to District Court That I_Will Communicate As A_Courtesy
  17. District Court Ken Wells Response To My Reproach of Jo Stonebridge Re Courteous
MenuTranscriptsDistrictCourtKeyyOBrien

Menu: Transcripts, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 22nd November, 2010, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  2. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 28th January, 2011, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  3. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:


includedMenuAvengerRevengeRetribution.php.html

Menu: Retribution for FRAUD & BULLYING by Douglas Porter & The University of Qld, of DISABLED old man.

[A Cascading Drop Down Menu [CDDM] will soon be in this spot.]
  1. Douglas Porter [& University of Qld] FRAUD on Disabled Old Man to BULLY him
  2. How Nazi BULLY of Disabled old man, ex librarian Janine Schmidt "repaid".
  3. Read how BCC bully Councillor Judy Magub "repaid" for assisting to defraud disabled old man.
  4. The University of Queensland is fully liable for the Fraud of ex Registrar Douglas Porter.
  5. The Clandestine method used by Douglas Porter to defraud the disabled old man.
  6. Means that Anglican Church Fraudster Priest Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan used to defraud the disabled old man.
  7. Rev John Morgan's Fraud he called Australian Institute of Ethics and the Professions
  8. The way that the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church assisted the Fraud of the disabled old man or BIG PROFITS!
  9. Douglas Porter is the Chairman of the UQ council called St Johns College Council that Runs St Johns College.
  10. The real lowdown on St Johns College at The University of Queensland, and is part of the Australian Public Sector [Government].
  11. How Lawyer Stephen Tonge, a UQ hanger on, profited by assisting the fraud of the disable old man.
  12. Korske Ara Amrita   ISSN: 1834-6340   [What is Korske Ara Amrita?] 
  13. Louise Kitchen Amrita   ISSN:  1834-643X   [What is Louise Kitchen Amrita?]
  14. The Magistrate whose conduct in Court was described buy the Qld Court of Appeal as Topsy-Turvy "Sentence First - Verdict afterwards".
  15. How Magistrate PaulM Kluck Denies a Fair Hearing & DueProcess by denying Accommodation of the Disabled old man's Special Needs
  16. No Jurisdiction: Lies, Fraud, Hot Potato-Get Rid of It
  17. Shane Hunter, the CDPP lawyer uses an abuse of court process to bully a disabled old man.
  18. The way that Tony Roser, Registrar of Courts, at the Brisbane Magistrates Court thinks he can bully the disabled old man.
  19. How Magistrates Courts' incompetent Tape recorder operator, Nikki Parisi, has tickets on herself and stuffs up.
  20. The Multiple ways Police/cop Armed Robber Henri Elias Rantala assisted the defrauding of the Disabled Old Man.
  21. The  ways Police/cop Armed Robber Monica Antony assisted the defrauding of the Disabled Old Man.
  22. The WIDESPREAD fraud & corruption, across Australia, of the rspca taking advantage of the public sector corruption across Australia.
  23. The FRAUD & CORRUPTION of Maree Fell and co of the Society of St Vincent de Paul, in Cairns as they lied and cheated to close down Vinnies' Gym and steal all Gym equipment belonging to Jim Tierney.
  24. Expose of ex Dean of Law at UQ, Geoffrey deQ Walker as he set out to cheat disabled old man to please his corrupt colleagues.
  25. Expose of how UQ Deputy Vice-Chancellor Ted Brown Conspired with Douglas Porter, and ex Dean of Law at UQ, Geoffrey deQ Walker to cheat disabled Old man.
  26. The fraud, perjury, lies and cheating of the Disabled Old Man by ex Coles Manager Linda Maree Wease.
  27. The many levels of corruption in the Queensland Police:
  28. Police/copper Brendan Read defrauds disabled old man & Signs Oath of facts of which he has no knowledge.
  29. Accountants KPMG wanted ex cop Brendan Read who deposed to false oath, to defraud clients of KPMG.
  30. Brisbane City Council concoct RUSE  to try to justify Armed Robbery For University of Queensland & Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church.
  31. Campbell Newman happy to conceal the fraud and Armed Robbery of disabled old many by BCC.
  32. Australia's Governor-General's connection to, and knowledge of, FRAUD in the Courts in Qld
  33. When a barrister, Chief Judge of the Qld District Court Patsy Mary Wolfe Abrogated her Paramount Duty To the Court and so Defrauds Disabled old man.
  34. For Years Qld's Translink cheat the Disabled Old Man by banning his Assistance dogs.
  35. Peter Strachan, Translink CEO is the Incompetent Public Sector Parasite Discriminates against the Disabled & reclusive Old Man.
  36. Are Margaret White, Patsy Mary Wolfe & Quentin Bryce previously of UQ_Law Faculty a Corrupt Tyranny Trio due  Fraud & Fraud On Courts?
  37. BEWARE of UQ Sports Ltd as Chairman, Douglas Porter is a Criminal & Fraudster. He is not a fit & proper person to be a company director.
  38. You decide.  Is Susan Barker of the Queensland Office of Information Commissioner, Incompetent or a Fraud?
  39. Valuable Information about the Queensland Office of the Information Commissioner.
  40. Is John Briton,  the Legal Services Commissioner for Queensland, Incompetent or a Fraud?  He stated in writing, the contrary of a basic legal principle.
  41. Valuable Information about the Queensland Legal Services Commission.
  42. Valuable Information about the Queensland Crime & Misconduct Commission.
PHPincludesPlagiocephaly/includedSeeMenuNewPlagiocephalyLinks.php

SEE:  Overview of multiple criminal frauds of me by Douglas Porter & The University of Queensland:

includedSummaryCaseFraudPoliceAndCDPP.php

Summary of the case by the Criminal, corrupt & FRAUDULENT Qld police AGAINST Disabled Old Man

This is the case where corrupt police and a corrupt Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, attempt to use brute force, of police arrest and harassment to silence the disabled old man, to conceal how the Queensland police performed an Armed Robbery on him to Assist the Queensland Government defraud the disabled old man of his house and land that he owned and which was his home.

The disabled old man has brain damage caused by severe head injury when a teenager.  That affects his ability to "work" for any but short time periods.  He is able to concentrate for only short periods. This is near impossible for a casual observer to notice.  He quickly becomes fatigued and if he is forced to continue to try to concentrate, that results in mental exhaustion.  On the first day of hearing, knowing the disabled old man's disability and the nature of it, Magistrate Klutz ridiculed the disabled old man, even though the disabled old man was trying hard to accommodate what the Magistrate desired.   CLEARLY, THE DISABLED OLD MAN MUST REFUSE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS, UNLESS AND UNTIL HIS SPECIAL NEEDS CONSEQUENT UPON HIS DISABILITIES ARE FULLY ACCOMMODATED.   THIS IS ESSENTIAL IF HE IS TO RECEIVE DUE PROCESS.  THE ONUS IS UPON THE MAGISTRATE, JUDGE AND DECISION MAKER, TO ENSURE THAT THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS EXTENDED DUE PROCESS aka NATURAL JUSTICE.

THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS HAPPY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS PROVIDED HE RECEIVES DUE PROCESS. 

The real crux of this fraud upon the disabled old man and concurrently, UPON THE JUSTICE AND LEGAL SYSTEM OF QUEENSLAND AND AUSTRALIA, is that this disabled old man is being prosecuted in the most contemptuous way, to continue the EXPLOITATION OF HIS BEING DISABLED BY THE QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT, in that the Queensland Government, defrauded/stole from the disabled old man, the house and land that he owned that was his home, for the use of and by The University of Queensland.  The clandestine fraud was orchestrated by the Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  The fraud involved an ARMED ROBBERY of the disabled old man by Queensland Police in company with a Queensland government Authority, for the benefit of another Queensland Government authority viz, The University of Queensland. The case involved a fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man. The same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala also charged the disabled old man with other charges to favour The University of Queensland, who had been defrauding the disabled old man for years.  ..

Instead of the Australian government doing as it should to honour its International Commitments [
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]] to rail against exploitation of disabled persons, it is actually perpetuating, ITSELF, the exploitation of this disabled old man, because no doubt, the exploitation of the disabled old man was by the Queensland Government, and a number of parts of the Queensland Government in collusion.

This fraud of the disabled old man was orchestrated by Queensland Public Sector Parasite, Douglas Porter, when he was Registrar of The University of Queensland, for the benefit of The University of Queensland and to punish the disabled old man for standing up for his rights as a Disabled person, while at The University of Queensland.  Involved in the Porter perpetrated fraud was an ARMED ROBBERY by the Queensland Government being the Queensland police in particular corrupt cops Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony, of the disabled old man at his home together with a concurrent fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man by the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala.

The law confirms that the Armed Robbery by Henri EliasRantala and Monica Louise Antony, was actually a CRIMINAL
armed robbery. The factual evidence is also online.  The conduct constituting the armed robbery was not just accidental.   The perpetrators of the fraud, Queensland Public Sector parasites, set out to create what they expected would be an arguable case TO JUSTIFY THE "ARMED ROBBERY" as just part of their normal operations.    They created a RUSE for just that reasonHowever, the silly bitch lawyer Joanne Whiting, did not know what she was doing, so clearly the Ruse was hatched by one of her superiors.

That fact then begs the question of the purpose of that
RUSE and armed robbery, and exposes the perpetrators of the defrauding of the disabled old man of his home.  Because the Queensland Government perpetrated the fraud of the disabled old man of his home, his house and land, the Queensland government wants it concealed.  Therefore, the conduct of prosecuting the disabled old man is criminal and makes the perpetrated an accessory to the fraud.  The evidence giving those prosecuting the disabled old man a "guilty mind" is all that evidence on that webpage.  Those involved now in "prosecuting" the disabled old man  are criminal. 

While the corrupt parasite Shane Hunter, a prosecutor from the Commonwealth DPP, had the knowledge that the corrupt police Rantala and Antony did commit an armed robbery, he cannot be prosecuted as he has "advocates' immunity".  However, none of the others involved in the process of prosecuting the Disabled Old Man have immunity.  Corrupt ex-cop [now 'working' for KPMG] Brendan Scott Read had put another "prosecutor" from the CDPP right into the frame, by admitting they colluded to bring the false charges against the disabled old man, but that prosecutor was not an advocate in this matter, so does not have
advocates' immunity.  That other parasite from the CDPP is named Anthony Gett.  Corrupt ex-cop Brendan Scott Read also does not have immunity from prosecution for being an accessory to the Armed Robbery and to the defrauding the disabled old man of his house and land, worth in the order of $1million.  Of course, we will be assisting the disabled old man to gain many more similar house and land properties in the area from the Fraudsters.  This will include the house of the defrauding lawyer who did the transfer of the title with full knowledge of the fraud.  His name is Stephen Tonge.  The Queensland Government, both the Queensland Public Sector university, The University of Queensland, and the Queensland Government of Anna Bligh proper,  will be up for the majority of the damages.  This all arose because the disabled old man IS disabled.  It was thought by the public sector parasites, with UQ Registrar Douglas Porter, as the lead criminal in the box seat driving the fraud of the disabled old man, that the disabled old man was ripe for exploitation, because he is permanently disabled.  Now, the Commonwealth of Australia, in the person of the corrupt Commonwealth DPP prosecutor Shane R. Hunter, has joined the fray exploiting the disabled old man.  This in in stark contravention of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The parasitic Federal labor government acceded to the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities  on 21st August, 2009.

Because all the police involved in the prosecution of the disabled old man, are presumed to know the detail of the evidence proving the armed robbery because the evidence and legal reason is in the Public Domain, online and it would be reasonable to presume that police would check its validity, and we know the evidence is 100% genuine, then all the police including the police solicitor Paxton Booth are put in the frame by the evidence of Brendan Scott Read.  The other police aware of the criminal conduct in which they were engaged included  Detective Sergeant Steven Bignall, Detective Senior Constables Gavin Hackett and Detective Senior Constable Dave Graham.  Each of these has been engaged in a criminal activity.  This amounts to 

Because parasitic fraudster Shane Hunter of the CDPP was prepared to prosecute these charges, when he knew the evidence proved that police Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony committed an Armed Robbery, suggests that he expected a win, meaning that he knew the Magistrates Court, and possibly the District Court are corrupt, like as displayed, maybe by Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and District Court Judge Leanne Clare.  that .d ..


This case now has a high profile International dimension.  Australia has ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD].  Importantly, the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia has, on 21st August, 2009 acceded to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [OP].  As shyster Shane Hunter is a Commonwealth Public Servant within the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, a Commonwealth Agency, a part of the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, he and it are subject to the OP.  As the disabled old man has already suffered extensive discrimination, and fraud, at the hands of Shyster Shane Hunter, breach of the CRPD has already occurred and hence, pursuant to the OP, formal complaint can be made to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Geneva, Switzerland, once all domestic Australian remedies have been exhausted, or effectively exhausted.

The summary for each day will be a Menu of the anchors [or markers/tags] placed in the Transcript of this day.  It will be effectively a Summary of the discussion between the Magistrate Paul M Kluck [the Klutz] and Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, [who knows the evidence that  proves the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala did in fact commit an armed robbery because no-one had authority to enter exclusively possessed land, on that occasion; they needed a court order but did not have one].  The disabled old man did not appear in the committal hearing coram Kluck, after 28th June, as he had become ill from the constant barrage of harassment and jibes aimed at his disabilities, and attacks upon his weaknesses caused by his disabilities, from the Magistrate Kluck the Klutz and from the Commonwealth Government lawyer fraudster Shane Hunter.  Of course, neither need worry as Magistrate Klutz has Judicial Immunity and shyster Shane Hunter who knows he is assisting a crime perpetrated by the Government against a disabled citizen, including EXPLOITATION of the DISABLED, to remain concealed, has Advocates' Immunity.  In Kluck's court, Due Process was abrogated, because the disabled old man had Special Needs that were not accommodated by Paul M Kluck. Hence, from that moment, Kluck's court became a nullity. Thus, from then, the disabled old man was denied Due Process.  Read on the transcript, how Magistrate Kluck ridiculed the disabled old man.

At the time of committing the Armed Robbery of the disabled old man, Henri Elias Rantala illegally arrested the disabled old man so as to keep him from his home while his home was ransacked and his yard was cleared of all of his possession to order of the Queensland Government, who wished to take control of his property in quick time, for The University of Queensland to use.  This was orchestrated by the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  Well, on 20th July, 2010, 22 days after the last day that the disabled old man tried to perform in the committal hearing, on 28th June, 2010, the Queensland Court of Appeal gave it decision regarding that illegal arrest on that day of the disabled old man by parasite cop Rantala.  In clear dicta the Court of Appeal raised the spectre of the gross criminality involved in the whole matter

This day's transcript is one continuous file/page.  These anchors when listed will be listed in sequence.
The three days when witnesses have actually given evidence have been similarly summarised with "anchors" [aka markers/tags], and each appears thus:
  1. Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  2. Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  3. Day 3: 28th June, 2010
This case has international consequences, as this action by the Commonwealth Prosecutor, given that the disabled old man has been thrown out of his home by a corrupt judicial system of the magistrates and District Courts, is a disgusting reflection upon the judicial principle of Due Process, for any country in the world. This will make Australia the laughing stock of the international justice community.  So much more so as all this has been done with the full knowledge of the Australian Attorney General, Robert McClelland.


See **** The EVIDENCE **** that ex-police cop parasite Peter Dutton, Liberal Party Federal MP for Dickson, tried, but failed, to close down our website disclosing labor ELECTORAL FRAUD, using corrupt Qld cops.

  Australian Federal Court Judge Jeffrey Spender is criminal scum. See the EVIDENCE

BREAKTHROUGH in Daniel Morcombe case.
We
SCOOPED Channel 7, TV & EXPOSED POLICE CORRUPTION.

See the photo PROOF
 E-Contact us to tell us what you think:

This website is part of the web-presence of

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA

View list of SOME of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html

SEE WHAT I PLAN TO DO ABOUT IT!

Image

CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE


Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA

View list of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html

See our LATEST TOPICS:

HOT NEWS: HARD EVIDENCE:  Joe Hockey & FASCIST CRIMINAL congress

I have been bullied my whole life.  See the reason.  That means that I have had fights my whole life.  You can realize the I detest bullies; that is, bullies that are personal to me, politically domestically which includes corrupt polticians, judges and ,MAGISTRATES  & MAGISTRATESmagistrates, more magistrates, lawyers, lawyers, and police, police, and other public sector parasites, plus, politically INTERNATIONALLY.

20041129 more reduced and cropped photo police Rantala.jpgDCP_0517_Big_Big_Big_A_Constable_Antony.jpg

















 CORRUPT ARMED ROBBER [with violence] Henri Elias Rantala. 

[see NEW Website on Henri Rantala]  

"PPheeeeew , that is HUUUUGE", he whispered.

Monica Antony [BigA for Antony]

Corrupt Cops  [talk about being the BUTT of humour]   'Does Swine flu [flew] have anything to do with the POLICE AIR WING? '  and who said, 'PIGS WILL FLY'.

SEE WHAT I PLAN TO DO ABOUT IT!

My Qualifications

       Bachelor of Commerce [BCom] [The University of Queensland] - 1978
       Bachelor of Science [BSc] [The University of Queensland]
- 1997
       Bachelor of Laws [LLB]
[The University of Queensland] - 2003
       Bachelor of Arts [BA]
[The University of Queensland] - 2003


   Police Constable Henri Elias Rantala aka 'Minge'  aka 'Dummy'  
20041129 more reduced and
            cropped photo police Rantala.jpg About this parasite , Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, now groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queensland police and Queensland government.
Rantala is a rare case within the Queensland Police Service [QPS] in that he he was "groomed" and "fast tracked" to continue the fraud, corruption and bribery that is the QPS within the wholesale corruption that is the Queensland labor Government.  [One major way to reduce this is the restoration of the Upper House  to the Queensland Parliament, the Legislative Council, as a democratically elected house.  It was abolished by the Queensland labor government in 1922.]  Rantala was groomed to be a police prosecutor, which is one position where police can be particularly corrupt.  As Prosecutors, they had Advocates Immunity.  I have been able to have this parasite under oath in the witness box subject to my cross examination.   In his evidence in chief at "Call Henri Elias Rantala" he produced a litany of lies.   My cross examination of him, and his replies thereto, at My Cross-Examination Of Corrupt Police Parasite Henri Elias Rantala,  are most instructive.  Considering all the subsequent events in the attempted corrupt cover-up of this gross crime of Armed Robbery by the Queensland Government, the extended period of planning activity that went into the perpetration of this Armed Robbery, and the fact that Rantala Left Indooroopilly Station from which he launched this Armed Robbery, targeting me, soon after in January2005, it appears Rantala was in integral part of this armed Robbery targeting me.  Just a few days prior, Douglas Porter, the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, for whom, as its Rep, Porter was orchestrating this Armed Robbery as a step towards stealing my beneficial ownership of my home, house and land, caused an attack on me and then called the police to me, and Rantala appeared..

 I will build in this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form.  This caption will accompany the image of Henri Elias Rantala where ever it appears on our websites.  It will be progressively added to all previous representations of his photo.
We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this parasite .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queensland police and Queensland government.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala aka Minge, aka dummy [he dumped his superior Superintendent Dale Pointon right into the CORRUPTION QUAGMIRE], Qld police prosecutor now prosecuting exclusively traffic charges, [I hear],, groomed to perpetuate corruption in the Queensland police and Queensland government. 



   Police Constable Monica Louise Antony aka 'Big A for Antony' 

DCP_0517-Big_Big Big A
            Constable Antony.jpg
We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this twit brainwashed with a bidet .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Corrupt cop Monica Louise Antony aka BigA for Antony, SUPER DUMB FEMALE Just consider her answers in my cross-examination of her, now that the police hierarchy has shuffled her out of the way, so she can do no harm to police corruption by her inability to lie convincingly.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Corrupt cop Monica Louise Antony aka BigA for Antony, SUPER DUMB FEMALE Just consider her answers in my cross-examination of her, now that the police hierarchy has shuffled her out of the way, so she can do no harm to police corruption by her inability to lie convincingly. 


../CorruptMagistratesMenu.php ../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

Dumb Cop Henri Rantala UPDATE:


SEE:    Rantala-Gate:  => Qld Police CORRUPTION COVER-UP
& FACE of    Rantala-Gate:

UPDATE:

More PROOF of SENIOR LEVEL POLICE Corruption in Qld

[and not just in Queensland:]
Dumb cop Henri Elias Rantala dumps Superintendent Pointon and Senior cops right into the CORRUPTION MIRE that is Queensland.

  • Superintendent Dale Richard Pointon,

  • Officers from

    • Ethical Standards Command,

    • Security Intelligence Branch,

    • State Crime Operations Command



"The offensive material has been subsequently been maintained on the internet since that time until the present day.  I have been contacted by Superintendent Pointon, Officers from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, State Crime Operations Command, relatives all asking question about the material from 2006 until the present day."

"The offensive material has been subsequently been maintained on the internet since that time until the present day.  I have been contacted by Superintendent Pointon, Officers from Ethical Standards Command, Security Intelligence Branch, State Crime Operations Command, relatives all asking questions about the material from 2006 until the present day."

../CorruptMagistratesMenu.php ../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php
This, above, has been stated in writing in a signed statement by the
Corrupt Police Prosecutor Henri Elias Rantala, dated 21st October, 2009; [20091021].   What he calls "offensive material" is the irrefutable PROOF that Police Officer Henri Elias Rantala, committed an ARMED ROBBERY.  This "offensive material" also includes MY REPORT TO POLICE OF ARMED ROBBERY, which they have ignored.  This statement by Rantala, is now PROOF that the police are AWARE OF THE ARMED ROBBERY and are ignoring my complaint of ARMED ROBBERY, AND BREAKING, ENTERING AND STEALING by Queensland Police and Government officials.   I am trained in law with an LLB apart from my other qualifications.  I know more law that these mug police officers.  The evidence, the  irrefutable PROOF,  is shown on these websites.  It shows that Rantala, while armed, ensured that thieves could ransack my home.  The fact that the thieves pretended they were from Brisbane City  Council is irrelevant, as they did not have a legal right to enter.  The Queensland Parliament sets the process for Council to enter private property.  This involved obtaining a COURT ORDER.  The armed robbers and thieves did not have a court order.  Australia is becoming a REAL POLICE STATE, when police believe they can over-ride STATUTE LAW passed by the legislature.  

That police ignore instances of ARMED ROBBERY, is not unique in Queensland.   Andrew Phillip Scipione the Commissioner of the New South Wales Police Force is GUILTY OF SIMILAR CRIME [cover-up] IN NSW as relates to the case below.



Thieves using ARMED POLICE to detain the owner of the property, and keep the owner of the property separated from his property while the thieves steal the property, happens regularly with Queensland Corrupt Police.   One case occurred on 15th September, 2005 in Cairns when the thieves from St Vincent de Paul Society, with whom Jim Tierney previously of JT's Gym in NSW, were operating a Joint Venture for Charitable Purposes, called "Vinnie's Gym", where Jim Tierney supplied his own labour and his own Gym equipment, valued many years previous, at over $1 million dollars worth.  The thieves from St Vincent de Paul Society had corrupt ARMED police attend and 'escort' Jim Tierney, AT GUN POINT, from his equipment and keep him from it, while they stripped the Gym of Jim Tierney's valuable gym equipment.

On 15th September, 2005,the ARMED police and sparmy callous hypocritical Brisbane based paid staff of St Vincent dePaul Society, arrived unannounced to steal Jim Tierney's one million dollars plus worth of gym equipment, by ostensibly 'closing' the gym. When one of the instructors asked what they should tell the group of very disabled people who were due in that afternoon, the answer from the sparmy hypocritical CEO of the thieving St Vincent dePaul Society was 'life is tough'. In an effort to calm the situation, "Enough," said Judith Tierney.


Police Armed Robbery Elsewhere

This has been a case of POLICE THUGGERY.  This, my case, is not a unique case of armed police using their position, to detain property owners, to enable thieves to rob them. Another documented case occurred in 2002 at Queanbeyan, with ARMED ROBBER scum pig Leslie Charles Gilroy  employed by Andrew Phillip Scipione the Commissioner of the New South Wales Police Force



../CorruptMagistratesMenu.php ../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php