HAIG    REPORT:    GoTo [on this page] HaigReport's Menu Of Themes of Menus for our thousands of pages
TIPS for
Navigating HaigReport:  If you arrived at this page, referred from a Search Engine such as Google et al, your URL link will NOT have an #Anchor/Marker to take you to the relevant spot on this page.  In that case, we do recommend that you view our "Latest HaigReport Promotions" of recent additions to our websites, by Clicking Here.  It will open in a new Browser window. 

If
you Click Here, you will be taken, usually, to the specific Unique Content on this page, for which you were most likely seeking.  However, if you Click Here, you will be taken to the Top of the HaigReport Header, below on this page. 

However, if you have arrived at this page from another of our Website pages, your link will usually have an #Anchor, also called a marker, which will take you to the intended specific spot on the page where that marker is positioned.  In fact, it will probably take you there prior to your reading this.  Moving to that Anchor is the final step in the loading of this page.

 HAIG     REPORT:   Is now on  twitter  [from 2nd June, 2013]  link to us HERE on twitter     See our Twitter Strategy    

 HAIG    REPORT:  SEE: Russell Mathews' COMMENTARY:    Russell Mathews' [BCom BSc LLB & BA] current TOPICAL commentary on GOVERNMENT, politics & business     Press to READ       Press for MENU   

 HAIG    REPORT:    WANTED:
Healthy female "dog" to breed with Parson Russell Terrier, to produce ASSISTANCE DOGS.   Rochedale South QLD 4123
I wish to breed from my Parson Russell Terrier. He is a trained assistance dog. He has a wonderful nature. The breed of his mate could be varied or a cross; eg Parson Russell Terrier, Jack Russell Terrier, Beagle, Bull Terrier, Bull mastiff, Staffy, and/or Fox Terrier plus many others. She does not need to be "pedigreed". I am very protective of my dogs. She will become very valuable to me and become one of my assistance "dogs". If we can assist each other, please contact me on my contact form, including your email address and your landline phone number so I can phone you to discuss. 

Because I am disabled and have an LLB [so therefore understand the Law surrounding disabilities and assistance dogs] I am now branching out to providing Assistance dogs to disabled persons [even if disabled in only a minor way and so not even realizing it]. This is not a business proposition but rather just a very necessary service I can offer to the community.
Many people have a disability and do not realize their ailment or "problem" is by law, the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA], classified as a "disability". This is especially so for people getting on in years, and who have a dog, and are maybe moving to accommodation where they are told they cannot take their dog. In a majority of cases, those people cannot be legally forced to surrender their animal/dog.
I will be assisting those person who already have dogs, but are being forced, unlawfully, to dispose of them because maybe they are moving accommodation. I can train your existing dogs to be assistance dogs and provide the documentation as required by the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA]. I do not intend to charge for this, but just maybe cover some marginal costs.

    View the Latest    HAIG     REPORT Promotions:  in this Scrolling Window, or OPEN in new browser:     

 Click here  to Learn how your Personalized Alert Notice [IMMEDIATELY ABOVE] is prepared by our HAIG Unique Visitor Algorithm: [HUVA] or  Click here  to see your UNIQUE Personalized Alert Notice in a new Browser Window.


Submission #0004 by Russell Mathews; in Sec222 Justices Act 1886 Appeal in District Court, # D3095/10: 10AM [now 9:30AM AEST] 16th May, 2011 coram His Honour DCJ Kerry O'Brien[?]:


My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies. The HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies.

   It is Our legal, social and moral DUTY to EXPOSE CRIME, FRAUD & CORRUPTION plus Lying and Hypocrisy in Public Life, Including Judges & magistrates 
 

Fraud, Corruption & attempted  MURDER 
covered-up by Queensland police, EXPOSED 

header: Qld District Court coram Kerry O'Brien:

Qld District Court coram Kerry O'Brien: 
Australian Government Steals Disabled Old Man's home for The University of Queensland to punish Disabled Old Man for being DISABLED & wants Court's sanction.

commonheader.php

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.  
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      EMAIL us anytime:  Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay. 

TitlesDCKO/TitleDCKOincludedSubmission0004DistrictCourtKerryOBrienAppealD3095_10.php

Submission #0004 by Russell Mathews; in Sec222 Justices Act 1886; District Court, # D3095/10: 9:30AM 16th May, 2011 coram His Honour DCJ Kerry O'Brien: In the Matter: Mathews _v_ Read & another/Commissioner of Police:

includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php includedSeeMenuTranscriptsDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

See: the Menu: for Transcripts District Court Kerry O'Brien

includedSeeMenuDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

SEE: the Menu: for Qld District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien Exposed:

/NAB_Exposed/includedSeeMenuNABExposed.php

SEE: the Menu: for Emails: Registry, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien Exposed:

includedSummaryCaseFraudPoliceAndCDPP.php

Summary of the case by the Criminal, corrupt & FRAUDULENT Qld police AGAINST Disabled Old Man

This is the case where corrupt police and a corrupt Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, attempt to use brute force, of police arrest and harassment to silence the disabled old man, to conceal how the Queensland police performed an Armed Robbery on him to Assist the Queensland Government defraud the disabled old man of his house and land that he owned and which was his home.

The disabled old man has brain damage caused by severe head injury when a teenager.  That affects his ability to "work" for any but short time periods.  He is able to concentrate for only short periods. This is near impossible for a casual observer to notice.  He quickly becomes fatigued and if he is forced to continue to try to concentrate, that results in mental exhaustion.  On the first day of hearing, knowing the disabled old man's disability and the nature of it, Magistrate Klutz ridiculed the disabled old man, even though the disabled old man was trying hard to accommodate what the Magistrate desired.   CLEARLY, THE DISABLED OLD MAN MUST REFUSE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS, UNLESS AND UNTIL HIS SPECIAL NEEDS CONSEQUENT UPON HIS DISABILITIES ARE FULLY ACCOMMODATED.   THIS IS ESSENTIAL IF HE IS TO RECEIVE DUE PROCESS.  THE ONUS IS UPON THE MAGISTRATE, JUDGE AND DECISION MAKER, TO ENSURE THAT THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS EXTENDED DUE PROCESS aka NATURAL JUSTICE.

THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS HAPPY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS PROVIDED HE RECEIVES DUE PROCESS. 

The real crux of this fraud upon the disabled old man and concurrently, UPON THE JUSTICE AND LEGAL SYSTEM OF QUEENSLAND AND AUSTRALIA, is that this disabled old man is being prosecuted in the most contemptuous way, to continue the EXPLOITATION OF HIS BEING DISABLED BY THE QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT, in that the Queensland Government, defrauded/stole from the disabled old man, the house and land that he owned that was his home, for the use of and by The University of Queensland.  The clandestine fraud was orchestrated by the Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  The fraud involved an ARMED ROBBERY of the disabled old man by Queensland Police in company with a Queensland government Authority, for the benefit of another Queensland Government authority viz, The University of Queensland. The case involved a fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man. The same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala also charged the disabled old man with other charges to favour The University of Queensland, who had been defrauding the disabled old man for years.  ..

Instead of the Australian government doing as it should to honour its International Commitments [
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]] to rail against exploitation of disabled persons, it is actually perpetuating, ITSELF, the exploitation of this disabled old man, because no doubt, the exploitation of the disabled old man was by the Queensland Government, and a number of parts of the Queensland Government in collusion.

This fraud of the disabled old man was orchestrated by Queensland Public Sector Parasite, Douglas Porter, when he was Registrar of The University of Queensland, for the benefit of The University of Queensland and to punish the disabled old man for standing up for his rights as a Disabled person, while at The University of Queensland.  Involved in the Porter perpetrated fraud was an ARMED ROBBERY by the Queensland Government being the Queensland police in particular corrupt cops Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony, of the disabled old man at his home together with a concurrent fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man by the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala.

The law confirms that the Armed Robbery by Henri EliasRantala and Monica Louise Antony, was actually a CRIMINAL
armed robbery. The factual evidence is also online.  The conduct constituting the armed robbery was not just accidental.   The perpetrators of the fraud, Queensland Public Sector parasites, set out to create what they expected would be an arguable case TO JUSTIFY THE "ARMED ROBBERY" as just part of their normal operations.    They created a RUSE for just that reasonHowever, the silly bitch lawyer Joanne Whiting, did not know what she was doing, so clearly the Ruse was hatched by one of her superiors.

That fact then begs the question of the purpose of that
RUSE and armed robbery, and exposes the perpetrators of the defrauding of the disabled old man of his home.  Because the Queensland Government perpetrated the fraud of the disabled old man of his home, his house and land, the Queensland government wants it concealed.  Therefore, the conduct of prosecuting the disabled old man is criminal and makes the perpetrated an accessory to the fraud.  The evidence giving those prosecuting the disabled old man a "guilty mind" is all that evidence on that webpage.  Those involved now in "prosecuting" the disabled old man  are criminal. 

While the corrupt parasite Shane Hunter, a prosecutor from the Commonwealth DPP, had the knowledge that the corrupt police Rantala and Antony did commit an armed robbery, he cannot be prosecuted as he has "advocates' immunity".  However, none of the others involved in the process of prosecuting the Disabled Old Man have immunity.  Corrupt ex-cop [now 'working' for KPMG] Brendan Scott Read had put another "prosecutor" from the CDPP right into the frame, by admitting they colluded to bring the false charges against the disabled old man, but that prosecutor was not an advocate in this matter, so does not have
advocates' immunity.  That other parasite from the CDPP is named Anthony Gett.  Corrupt ex-cop Brendan Scott Read also does not have immunity from prosecution for being an accessory to the Armed Robbery and to the defrauding the disabled old man of his house and land, worth in the order of $1million.  Of course, we will be assisting the disabled old man to gain many more similar house and land properties in the area from the Fraudsters.  This will include the house of the defrauding lawyer who did the transfer of the title with full knowledge of the fraud.  His name is Stephen Tonge.  The Queensland Government, both the Queensland Public Sector university, The University of Queensland, and the Queensland Government of Anna Bligh proper,  will be up for the majority of the damages.  This all arose because the disabled old man IS disabled.  It was thought by the public sector parasites, with UQ Registrar Douglas Porter, as the lead criminal in the box seat driving the fraud of the disabled old man, that the disabled old man was ripe for exploitation, because he is permanently disabled.  Now, the Commonwealth of Australia, in the person of the corrupt Commonwealth DPP prosecutor Shane R. Hunter, has joined the fray exploiting the disabled old man.  This in in stark contravention of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The parasitic Federal labor government acceded to the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities  on 21st August, 2009.

Because all the police involved in the prosecution of the disabled old man, are presumed to know the detail of the evidence proving the armed robbery because the evidence and legal reason is in the Public Domain, online and it would be reasonable to presume that police would check its validity, and we know the evidence is 100% genuine, then all the police including the police solicitor Paxton Booth are put in the frame by the evidence of Brendan Scott Read.  The other police aware of the criminal conduct in which they were engaged included  Detective Sergeant Steven Bignall, Detective Senior Constables Gavin Hackett and Detective Senior Constable Dave Graham.  Each of these has been engaged in a criminal activity.  This amounts to 

Because parasitic fraudster Shane Hunter of the CDPP was prepared to prosecute these charges, when he knew the evidence proved that police Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony committed an Armed Robbery, suggests that he expected a win, meaning that he knew the Magistrates Court, and possibly the District Court are corrupt, like as displayed, maybe by Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and District Court Judge Leanne Clare.  that .d ..


This case now has a high profile International dimension.  Australia has ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD].  Importantly, the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia has, on 21st August, 2009 acceded to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [OP].  As shyster Shane Hunter is a Commonwealth Public Servant within the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, a Commonwealth Agency, a part of the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, he and it are subject to the OP.  As the disabled old man has already suffered extensive discrimination, and fraud, at the hands of Shyster Shane Hunter, breach of the CRPD has already occurred and hence, pursuant to the OP, formal complaint can be made to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Geneva, Switzerland, once all domestic Australian remedies have been exhausted, or effectively exhausted.

The summary for each day will be a Menu of the anchors [or markers/tags] placed in the Transcript of this day.  It will be effectively a Summary of the discussion between the Magistrate Paul M Kluck [the Klutz] and Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, [who knows the evidence that  proves the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala did in fact commit an armed robbery because no-one had authority to enter exclusively possessed land, on that occasion; they needed a court order but did not have one].  The disabled old man did not appear in the committal hearing coram Kluck, after 28th June, as he had become ill from the constant barrage of harassment and jibes aimed at his disabilities, and attacks upon his weaknesses caused by his disabilities, from the Magistrate Kluck the Klutz and from the Commonwealth Government lawyer fraudster Shane Hunter.  Of course, neither need worry as Magistrate Klutz has Judicial Immunity and shyster Shane Hunter who knows he is assisting a crime perpetrated by the Government against a disabled citizen, including EXPLOITATION of the DISABLED, to remain concealed, has Advocates' Immunity.  In Kluck's court, Due Process was abrogated, because the disabled old man had Special Needs that were not accommodated by Paul M Kluck. Hence, from that moment, Kluck's court became a nullity. Thus, from then, the disabled old man was denied Due Process.  Read on the transcript, how Magistrate Kluck ridiculed the disabled old man.

At the time of committing the Armed Robbery of the disabled old man, Henri Elias Rantala illegally arrested the disabled old man so as to keep him from his home while his home was ransacked and his yard was cleared of all of his possession to order of the Queensland Government, who wished to take control of his property in quick time, for The University of Queensland to use.  This was orchestrated by the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  Well, on 20th July, 2010, 22 days after the last day that the disabled old man tried to perform in the committal hearing, on 28th June, 2010, the Queensland Court of Appeal gave it decision regarding that illegal arrest on that day of the disabled old man by parasite cop Rantala.  In clear dicta the Court of Appeal raised the spectre of the gross criminality involved in the whole matter

This day's transcript is one continuous file/page.  These anchors when listed will be listed in sequence.
The three days when witnesses have actually given evidence have been similarly summarised with "anchors" [aka markers/tags], and each appears thus:
  1. Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  2. Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  3. Day 3: 28th June, 2010
This case has international consequences, as this action by the Commonwealth Prosecutor, given that the disabled old man has been thrown out of his home by a corrupt judicial system of the magistrates and District Courts, is a disgusting reflection upon the judicial principle of Due Process, for any country in the world. This will make Australia the laughing stock of the international justice community.  So much more so as all this has been done with the full knowledge of the Australian Attorney General, Robert McClelland.

includedCDDMenuAvengerRevengeRetribution.php includedSeeMenuQueenJanine

See: the Menu: for 'Queen' Janine Schmidt, University of Queensland LIBRARY FRAUD:

considerevidence.php

Consider the evidence! Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay.  

includedCDDMenuAvengerRevengeRetribution.php http://HaigReport.com/aaaaMenu/Menus/includedMenuDefraudingMeMyHome.php

LinkToAspinallInMorganPanel This Profile Panel re the dumb parasitic anglican priest John Leslie Morgan, links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud by archbishop Phillip Aspinall of a vulnerable disabled guy where anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall headed up the scheme to steal the home of this vulnerable disabled guy.

http://HaigReport.com/Photos/100_0663_20070120CanonRevProfDrJohnLeslieMorganWardenStJohnsCollegeUniversityQueenslandHidingBehindToiletRolls_cr30pc.jpg
About this despicable life form , Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, now Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.

This photo was taken in a supermarket, on the 20th January, 2007 at 4:54PM Brisbane, Australia time, when Morgan was attemting to not be photographed by hiding behind some toilet rolls.

This individual is evil and he escapes scrutiny as he is a "priest".  Over time I have collected much evidence about his evil and criminal actions and published it.  I have assembled that into a menu.  I now include that menu here.
/PHPincludesCorruptBrisbaneDiocese/includedMenuJohnMorgan.php Menu: CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan, @ St Johns College, UQ:
*  PROOF of the 2001 FRAUD  by CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Morgan
*  Directory of links about Criminal parasite priest Rev Canon John Leslie Morgan:
*  Directory of Anglican CORRUPTION matters:
*  Anglicans conspire to steal the home of disabled with aid of political & judicial corruption
*  PROOF of another instance that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is yet again a LIAR
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is Incompetent
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is a BULLY
*  Email from Morgan showing he is a silly malicious ratbag 
*  Is this Primate Aspinall's BUSINESS ACUMEN?
*  Anglican priest bullies DISABLED Neighbour to STEAL his HOME.
*  Yet another Morgan LIE that neither he nor St John's College had any documents about me..  I had to push it all the way to the Privacy Commission, who Morgan was repeatedly ignoring.  He really thinks he is god.
*  Anglican CORRUPTION EXPOSED
*  Another Morgan LIE
*  One of the many examples of MONEY & FRAUD being motivator of 'Rev' John Morgan
*  $1Mill+ FRAUD- St Johns College & University of Queensland
*  Australian CRIMINAL LAW Journal ISSN: 1321-6562 26 February, 2007. Issue #: 200702
*  FRAUD on Uni Students: $1,500 RENT PER WEEK, for an ASBESTOS RIDDEN dump.
*  Is FRAUD the answer for Anglican return on investment?

We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland. 

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php aaaaLinks/LinkToRantalaGateIndexPage.php

If you wish to view and USE the Full    Rantala-Gate:   Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia  cascading drop down menu [CDDM], click to GoTo the   Rantala-Gate:    website.



New Document TitlesDCKO/TitleDCKOincludedSubmission0004DistrictCourtKerryOBrienAppealD3095_10.php

Submission #0004 by Russell Mathews; in Sec222 Justices Act 1886; District Court, # D3095/10: 9:30AM 16th May, 2011 coram His Honour DCJ Kerry O'Brien: In the Matter: Mathews _v_ Read & another/Commissioner of Police:

includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php includedSeeMenuDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

SEE: the Menu: for Qld District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien Exposed:

/NAB_Exposed/includedSeeMenuNABExposed.php

SEE: the Menu: for Emails: Registry, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien Exposed:

includedSeeMenuTranscriptsDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

See: the Menu: for Transcripts District Court Kerry O'Brien


PHPincludes/includedWrittenByRussellMathews.php
Web-site, Written, Coded, Produced and Directed by
Russell G H Mathews
BCom BSc LLB BA

International Disability Rights Advocate
invoking
UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
& UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Image
CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE

View list of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards
Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html

RussellMathewsEmailSignatureDRA

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
International Disability Rights Advocate
invoking
UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
& UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
See my RESOUNDING VICTORY 20th July, 2010 in
Qld Court of Appeal

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of
      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND
Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]

http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

includedCDDMenuAvengerRevengeRetribution.php http://HaigReport.com/aaaaMenu/Menus/includedMenuDefraudingMeMyHome.php

LinkToAspinallInMorganPanel This Profile Panel re the dumb parasitic anglican priest John Leslie Morgan, links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud by archbishop Phillip Aspinall of a vulnerable disabled guy where anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall headed up the scheme to steal the home of this vulnerable disabled guy.

http://HaigReport.com/Photos/100_0663_20070120CanonRevProfDrJohnLeslieMorganWardenStJohnsCollegeUniversityQueenslandHidingBehindToiletRolls_cr30pc.jpg
About this despicable life form , Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, now Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.

This photo was taken in a supermarket, on the 20th January, 2007 at 4:54PM Brisbane, Australia time, when Morgan was attemting to not be photographed by hiding behind some toilet rolls.

This individual is evil and he escapes scrutiny as he is a "priest".  Over time I have collected much evidence about his evil and criminal actions and published it.  I have assembled that into a menu.  I now include that menu here.
/PHPincludesCorruptBrisbaneDiocese/includedMenuJohnMorgan.php Menu: CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan, @ St Johns College, UQ:
*  PROOF of the 2001 FRAUD  by CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Morgan
*  Directory of links about Criminal parasite priest Rev Canon John Leslie Morgan:
*  Directory of Anglican CORRUPTION matters:
*  Anglicans conspire to steal the home of disabled with aid of political & judicial corruption
*  PROOF of another instance that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is yet again a LIAR
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is Incompetent
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is a BULLY
*  Email from Morgan showing he is a silly malicious ratbag 
*  Is this Primate Aspinall's BUSINESS ACUMEN?
*  Anglican priest bullies DISABLED Neighbour to STEAL his HOME.
*  Yet another Morgan LIE that neither he nor St John's College had any documents about me..  I had to push it all the way to the Privacy Commission, who Morgan was repeatedly ignoring.  He really thinks he is god.
*  Anglican CORRUPTION EXPOSED
*  Another Morgan LIE
*  One of the many examples of MONEY & FRAUD being motivator of 'Rev' John Morgan
*  $1Mill+ FRAUD- St Johns College & University of Queensland
*  Australian CRIMINAL LAW Journal ISSN: 1321-6562 26 February, 2007. Issue #: 200702
*  FRAUD on Uni Students: $1,500 RENT PER WEEK, for an ASBESTOS RIDDEN dump.
*  Is FRAUD the answer for Anglican return on investment?

We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland. 

includedSeeOverviewDouglasPorterUQLandFraud.php

See: the Overview:: of the Douglas Porter, University of Queensland Land Fraud:

Link to Public Sector Parasites VERSUS the Internet:

On a related topic, have a look at Public Sector Parasites Versus The Internet:
It's coming: Watch this space, but in the interim have a look at:

http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

http://HaigReport.com/aaaaMenu/Menus/includedMenuDefraudingMeMyHome.php

LinkToAspinallInMorganPanel This Profile Panel re the dumb parasitic anglican priest John Leslie Morgan, links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud by archbishop Phillip Aspinall of a vulnerable disabled guy where anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall headed up the scheme to steal the home of this vulnerable disabled guy.

http://HaigReport.com/Photos/100_0663_20070120CanonRevProfDrJohnLeslieMorganWardenStJohnsCollegeUniversityQueenslandHidingBehindToiletRolls_cr30pc.jpg
About this despicable life form , Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, now Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.

This photo was taken in a supermarket, on the 20th January, 2007 at 4:54PM Brisbane, Australia time, when Morgan was attemting to not be photographed by hiding behind some toilet rolls.

This individual is evil and he escapes scrutiny as he is a "priest".  Over time I have collected much evidence about his evil and criminal actions and published it.  I have assembled that into a menu.  I now include that menu here.
/PHPincludesCorruptBrisbaneDiocese/includedMenuJohnMorgan.php Menu: CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan, @ St Johns College, UQ:
*  PROOF of the 2001 FRAUD  by CORRUPT Rev Canon Prof Dr John Morgan
*  Directory of links about Criminal parasite priest Rev Canon John Leslie Morgan:
*  Directory of Anglican CORRUPTION matters:
*  Anglicans conspire to steal the home of disabled with aid of political & judicial corruption
*  PROOF of another instance that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is yet again a LIAR
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is Incompetent
*  PROOF that Rev Canon Professor Dr John Leslie Morgan is a BULLY
*  Email from Morgan showing he is a silly malicious ratbag 
*  Is this Primate Aspinall's BUSINESS ACUMEN?
*  Anglican priest bullies DISABLED Neighbour to STEAL his HOME.
*  Yet another Morgan LIE that neither he nor St John's College had any documents about me..  I had to push it all the way to the Privacy Commission, who Morgan was repeatedly ignoring.  He really thinks he is god.
*  Anglican CORRUPTION EXPOSED
*  Another Morgan LIE
*  One of the many examples of MONEY & FRAUD being motivator of 'Rev' John Morgan
*  $1Mill+ FRAUD- St Johns College & University of Queensland
*  Australian CRIMINAL LAW Journal ISSN: 1321-6562 26 February, 2007. Issue #: 200702
*  FRAUD on Uni Students: $1,500 RENT PER WEEK, for an ASBESTOS RIDDEN dump.
*  Is FRAUD the answer for Anglican return on investment?

We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this despicable life form .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland.   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Canon Rev. (sic) Prof. Dr John Leslie Morgan [he just loves his "titles", as worthless as they are; his PhD is in "divinity"], Anglican "Priest" & CRIMINAL, Warden, St Johns College, St Lucia Campus, of The CORRUPT University of Queensland. 

TitlesDCKO/TitleDCKOincludedSubmission0004DistrictCourtKerryOBrienAppealD3095_10.php

Submission #0004 by Russell Mathews; in Sec222 Justices Act 1886; District Court, # D3095/10: 9:30AM 16th May, 2011 coram His Honour DCJ Kerry O'Brien: In the Matter: Mathews _v_ Read & another/Commissioner of Police:

includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php includedSeeMenuTranscriptsDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

See: the Menu: for Transcripts District Court Kerry O'Brien

includedSeeMenuDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

SEE: the Menu: for Qld District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien Exposed:

/NAB_Exposed/includedSeeMenuNABExposed.php

SEE: the Menu: for Emails: Registry, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien Exposed:

http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php aaaaLinks/LinkToRantalaGateIndexPage.php

If you wish to view and USE the Full    Rantala-Gate:   Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia  cascading drop down menu [CDDM], click to GoTo the   Rantala-Gate:    website.



includedSeeMenuQueenJanine

See: the Menu: for 'Queen' Janine Schmidt, University of Queensland LIBRARY FRAUD:

includedSeeOverviewDouglasPorterUQLandFraud.php

See: the Overview:: of the Douglas Porter, University of Queensland Land Fraud:

includedCDDMenuAvengerRevengeRetribution.php includedSeeMenuQueenJanine

See: the Menu: for 'Queen' Janine Schmidt, University of Queensland LIBRARY FRAUD:

includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php includedSeeMenuDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

SEE: the Menu: for Qld District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien Exposed:

/NAB_Exposed/includedSeeMenuNABExposed.php

SEE: the Menu: for Emails: Registry, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien Exposed:

includedSeeMenuAvengerRevengeRetributionTruth

See: the Menu: for Avenger, Revenge, Retribution & TRUTH;

http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

TitlesDCKO/TitleDCKOincludedSubmission0004DistrictCourtKerryOBrienAppealD3095_10.php

Submission #0004 by Russell Mathews; in Sec222 Justices Act 1886; District Court, # D3095/10: 9:30AM 16th May, 2011 coram His Honour DCJ Kerry O'Brien: In the Matter: Mathews _v_ Read & another/Commissioner of Police:

includedCDDMenuCourtTranscripts.php includedSeeMenuTranscriptsDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

See: the Menu: for Transcripts District Court Kerry O'Brien

includedSeeMenuDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

SEE: the Menu: for Qld District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien Exposed:

/NAB_Exposed/includedSeeMenuNABExposed.php

SEE: the Menu: for Emails: Registry, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien Exposed:

TitlesDCKO/TitleDCKOincludedSubmission0004DistrictCourtKerryOBrienAppealD3095_10.php

Submission #0004 by Russell Mathews; in Sec222 Justices Act 1886; District Court, # D3095/10: 9:30AM 16th May, 2011 coram His Honour DCJ Kerry O'Brien: In the Matter: Mathews _v_ Read & another/Commissioner of Police:

http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

TitlesDCKO/TitleDCKOincludedSubmission0004DistrictCourtKerryOBrienAppealD3095_10.php

Submission #0004 by Russell Mathews; in Sec222 Justices Act 1886; District Court, # D3095/10: 9:30AM 16th May, 2011 coram His Honour DCJ Kerry O'Brien: In the Matter: Mathews _v_ Read & another/Commissioner of Police:

includedSubmission0004DistrictCourtKerryOBrienAppealD3095_10.php

District Court, Reference D3095/10: 10AM [now 9:30AM AEST] 16th May, 2011 coram His Honour DCJ Kerry O'Brien[?]:

In the Matter:

Mathews _v_ Read & another

Appearance & Submission #0004 by Russell Mathews:

This submission is being sent to
"Attorney-General, Robert McClelland & Brendan O’Connor MP, Minister for Home Affairs." <R.McClelland.MP@aph.gov.au>,
"David Adsett, Deputy Director, Commonwealth DPP, GPO Box 847, Brisbane Qld 4001. 19th Floor, 15 Adelaide Street, Brisbane, Qld, 4000. Phone: (07) 3224 9444, Fax: (07) 3229 4124. Brisbane@cdpp.gov.au" <Brisbane@cdpp.gov.au>,
"Director: Chris Craigie SC & First Deputy Director: John Thornton, Commonwealth DPP, GPO Box 3104, CANBERRA ACT 2601. 4 Marcus Clarke St, Canberra City ACT 2601. Phone: (02) 6206 5666 Fax: (02) 6257 5709  inquiries@cdpp.gov.au" <inquiries@cdpp.gov.au>,
as well as to the Queensland District Court, and Shane Hunter of the CDPP, so that they all are aware of this extremely serious problem of crime by many elements of the Australian Government against a disabled old man who is a citizen of Australia, and so they cannot later claim ignorance of this matter.  This matter has an ongoing influence on how Australia is viewed internationally.  I will imagine that this crime by the Australian Government against a disabled old man who is a citizen of Australia, will have an impact upon the way Australia and the Australian Government is viewed internationally.  I am prepared to exhaust all domestic remedies and then take this as a communication to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Geneva.

Because of my disability of brain damage, I make my submissions in writing.  For the convenience of the court, I make this available to the CDPP.   Because of my brain damage disability, I require contemporary transcripts, of the submissions of the other side and all public and private discussion by the court in the court, also in writing for the same reason.  I hereby seek the leave of the court to order such.  Hence, I require the court to make contemporary transcripts available to me.  For the court to proceed without ensuring this, is discrimination against me because I am disabled. It is discrimination by the CDPP to proceed if this is not provided.  The CDPP is subject to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities & UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.  Were that to occur, it would then seem that not only was the Commonwealth of Australia by the CDPP attempting to set me up, but so too was the District Court.   This would fall within an accommodation of special Needs of mine.  Denial of same is disability discrimination of me and a breach of UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities & UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities /.   I note at this point that my request on 10th May, 2011 for a preliminary hearing to determine and advise accommodations of my Special Needs, have been denied.  In fact, it has not even been officially denied but merely ignored as though I am of no consequence. I submit that it is discrimination by the CDPP to proceed if all my Special Needs are not provided.  The uncertainty to me caused by this has had an adverse effect upon me.  That is disability discrimination.  That I am disabled is well known to the court.  I suggest that this ignoring of my request was deliberate for this purpose. The CDPP is subject to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities & UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

In summary I submit that for the reasons following, each and every judge of the District Court of Queensland [Qld] should recuse him/her self on the grounds of apprehended bias especially CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe and her closest associated judge of the District Court DCJ Kerry John O"Brien who as Judge Administrator of the District Court, His Honour works most closely with the Chief DCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe, of any other DCJ.

In the interests of Justice it is essential that the court ensures that the two witnesses for whom the Court has issued subpoenas namely Whiting and Tolton be brought before the court to give evidence in this matter.  I submit that the court cannot avoid finding totally in my favour without hearing their full evidence.  I further submit that because I experience many difficulties due to my disabilities, and given that JAG had, via its JAG email server adversely affected the court's ability to communicate with me, that a fair court will make arrangements to ensure these witnesses appear.

The subject, location and timing of the scenario of armed robbery of me and my property and premises at 254 Hawken Drive St Lucia, by Qld police representative Henri Elias Rantala on Monday, 29th November, 2004 was the location, and timing of the bogus arrest of me by Rantala and which bogus was the subject of the egregious conduct of Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka Magistrate Topsy Turvy, on 1st June, 2005, when Ehrich acted in that egregious manner to, in his  words "get rid of it".  I submit that the reason Ehrich had been implored to "get rid of it" was to prevent the exposure of the Armed Robbery that had been effected by many including Rantala,  Monica Antony, Brisbane City Council and its staff and contractors.  Officers from Brisbane City Council had been subpoenaed to that magistrates court hearing, together with the non-existend court order.  As recently as December, 2008 Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka Topsy Turvy "sentence first - verdict afterwards". purported to incompetently revoke that sentence and verdict.   As recently as 2010, DCJ Leanne Clare had approved of all that egregious conduct by Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich, on both occasions..

Hence, there is reason to suspect that the conduct of Magistrate Paul M Kluck had been affected by the same or similar factors; to keep a lid on the massive crimes committed by criminal officials in Queensland.   It is not unreasonable to suspect that this conduct that would be criminal but for judicial immunity, extends to the District court.
 
On 6th March, 2008 Chief Magistrate Marchall Irwin publicly extolled the virtues and merits of the police solicitor Colin John Strofield caucusing with all magistrates and termed caucusing  as "liaison".  On the 1st June, 2005 on the occasion of the [or one] egregious conduct by Walter Harvey Ehrich, the police solicitor was one Colin John Strofield.  Ehrich was half an hour late into court that morning and immediately upon entering court rapidly began a process in relation to the charge "to get rid of it".  He spent absolutely no time in learning the nature of the matter but immediately canvassed a process to "get rid of it" in his words.  Colin John Strofield was not in court at that time.  That begs the question of whether Ehrich and Strofield were liaising, immediately prior to Ehrich entering court.

I further submit that a fair unbiased court should find that by his conduct of the proceedings in the Magistrates Court, Magistrate Paul M Kluck so extensively denied the disabled defendant reasonable accommodation of his special needs as to deny him Due Process of a fair hearing.  Hence, the fair unbiased court should find that all decisions of Magistrate Kluck are void ab initio.

The fair unbiased court then must determine what must be done with these charges.  I seek leave of the court to lead/present new evidence.  I seek this by virtue of having the two witness who have been subpoenaed namely Joanne Whiting of Brisbane City Legal Practice [BCLP]and barrister Wayne John Tolton give evidence, as detailed below.  I submit that the charges should be dismissed.  The evidence will show that Wayne Tolton's legal opinion was used to present a ruse or artifice to illegally enter my property to strip my yard and premises of my possessions, as a prelude to dispossessing me of my property, to defraud me of my beneficial ownership of that real estate property.  As the police officer who forced entry was armed, and it was planned by Brisbane City Council [BCC] and BCLP, that an armed police officer would be used to force entry on the ruse and artifice created by BCLP, this action was armed robbery by the Qld Police, Brisbane City Council and its particular staff and contractors.

It is further submitted that these baseless charges are disability discrimination of the accused, because he is disabled, and are breaches of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities & UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities as these charges are being conducted for ulterior and malicious purposes.  These charges are clearly a continuation of the defrauding of me of my property, by the Qld Government and its authorities, because I was then, am still now, disabled.

There exist a number of aspects to this matter.  The Court must be cognizant of these aspects.

I incorporate my four prior submissions, in this appeal and in the related Purported referral to the District Court per Sec20B Crimes Act 1914, as listed immediately below, in their entirety, AS HTML files and so including all hyper-linked content, in this submission, as if they had been copied and pasted into this submission, AS HTML files and so including all hyperlinked content, also as html.
  1. Submission #0001:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  2. Submission #0002:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  3. Initial General Submission to District Court coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien AO for mention 28th January, 2011
  4. Submission #0003 in Registrar's Reference; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 10AM 4th March, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read &

There are three stages to this my appeal.

  1. Reasonable apprehension of bias in the District Court, by a reasonably informed bystander.
  2. Denial of Due Process aka Natural Justice by Magistrate Paul M Kluck
  3. What the Court should thus do, with these charges.

1).    These charges were instigated by one Anthony Gett at the CDPP.  Prior to Detective Brendan Read becoming involved in progressing these four charges,  Anthony Gett of the CDPP initiated action with Queensland Police solicitor, Paxton Booth.

I refer to the testimony of Brendan Read on 25th June, 2010 under oath coram Kluck, online at
http://haigreport.com/CorruptPoliceRantalaTranscript/20100625Day2CorruptCopRantalaMagistratesCourtCommittal.php#BrendanReadCommunicatedWithAnthonyGettAtCommonwealthDPP

DET. BRENDAN READ:     I did speak to the Queensland Police - one of the lawyers that's employed by the Queensland Police, Paxton Booth to get his advice but he - he was the one that said it would be best talking to the Commonwealth DPP.


Okay. Who at the Commonwealth DPP?   Who was the person I spoke to?


Yes?    Anthony Gett.


As in Get, G-E-T-T?   I can't remember the exact spelling; I think it might be double T."


Anthony Gett is a close associate of CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe and ex-Federal Court Judge Jeffrey Spender.  Clearly, Anthony Gett is wanting a judicial appointment so is sucking up to judges with political influence.  One of these episodes occurred in relation to

International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law, 20th International Conference, [held in Brisbane on 2—6 July 2006]:
online at http://barweb.com.au/Upload/FCK/2006ProgandReg060201 3.4.06.pdf
so the court can take Judicial Notice of this information as it is in the Public Domain on a respected legal website ie http://barweb.com.au/ /.
JUSTICE FOR ALL —
VICTIMS, DEFENDANTS, PRISONERS
AND THE COMMUNITY
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
2—6 July 2006

For this, the Conference Organizing Committee, included
The Hon. Chief Justice Paul de Jersey AC, Chief Justice of Queensland, Brisbane;
The Hon. Chief Judge Patricia Wolfe, Chief Judge of the District Court of Queensland, Brisbane;
The Hon. Justice Jeffrey Spender, Federal Court of Australia, Brisbane.

For this conference the Program Organizing Committee
included Anthony Gett, Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, Brisbane.

Importantly, Anthony Gett played a much more servile and pivotal role to ingratiate himself with de Jersey, Wolfe and Spender in that he personally handled all the communications for all conference matters [ie all Conference correspondence], including for registrations of all attendees at the conference:

The public website included, and includes:
"REGISTRATION

Please address all Conference correspondence to:
Commonwealth D.P.P.
Attention: Anthony Gett
ISRCL 2006
GPO Box 847
Brisbane QLD 4001, Australia
fax: +61 7 3229 4124
email: isrcl2006@cdpp.gov.au /."

Between 1989 and 1992, CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe when a barrister, conspired with Quentin Bryce, then Director of Qld Office of HREOC, Clare Endicott, town agent for HREOC and Jeffrey Spender, to cheat and defraud me via the justice and judicial system of our country, in a FemiNazi conspiracy which included Federal Court action QG45 of 1991 titled Mathews v. HREOC & Ors coram Spender where the Professional Misconduct and/or Unprofessional Conduct of then barrister [for HREOC and others; the only barrister appearing for any defendants] Patsy Mary Wolfe included caucusing with Federal Court Judge Jeffrey Ernest John Spender, and failing to advise the court on relevant law being that the Exhibit JJA3 to the affidavit of John Joseph Armstrong consisted of prejudicial documents made available to the HREOC decision maker Kevin O'Connor, and not to me in HREOC Tribunal hearing coram O'Connor in 1991, and which thus made the purported decision of O'Connor void ab initio and unenforceable by Spender J.  I was unrepresented and clearly did not know the relevant law yet I advised Spender that I was not privy to the documents in JJA3. This conduct towards me, and all subsequent conduct towards me, was because I am disabled.

For the same alleged conduct, as I alleged by the FemiNazi conspiracy, the Law Faculty at The University of Qld, while maintaining a close association with Spender and Wolfe, continued this defrauding and cheating of me  in 1992, 1994, and 1995, and then in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001 the Science Faculty at The University of Qld cheated and defrauded me in a continuation of the same motive, and again, for the same motive, the libraries at The University of Qld in 2003, 2004, and 2005 continued to cheat and defraud me.  The University of Qld by its then Registrar Douglas Porter, who had been involved in the three previous chapters of cheating and defrauding of me by The University of Qld, was engaged in defrauding me of my home at 254 Hawken Drive.  It was to that end that the Armed Robbery of me by Policeman Henri Elias Rantala occurred on 29th November, 2004.  By common purpose, perpetrators of this armed robbery included officers of the Brisbane City Council [BCC].  The BCC were willing co-conspirators in cheating me of my house and land by The University of Qld.  Also, knowingly concerned in the defrauding me of my house and land at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, was the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane [CSDB], aka the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC].  Importantly, The Hon. Chief Justice Paul de Jersey AC, Chief Justice of Queensland, Brisbane is Chancellor of The Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane [CSDB], aka the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC].

This cheating and defrauding and disability discrimination extended back to at least 1974 when I was cheated by Terence Joseph Mellifont and Jeffrey Spender, then a barrister.  These two were known then as Labor Lawyers and all relevant major judicial [and Governor  and Governor General] appointments, since then, have been by labor.  Mellifont and Spender cheated me coram the Railway Appeals Tribunal. As well, Mellifont tried to grossly overcharge me.

Labor has also appointed his wife, Julie Maree Mellifont [nee Dick] to be a judge of the District Court.

Further District Court conduct is relevant.  When Policeman Henri Elias Rantala committed the Armed Robbery of me on 29th November, 2004, he falsely arrested me on bogus charges.  When these bogus charge for this arrest came before the Magistrates Court on 1st June, 2005, the magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich performed uniquely, including bellowing at me "SIT DOWN" when I calmly requested explanation of what he was doing.  The Court of Appeal later compared his actions to Topsy Turvy a la Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland;."Sentence first - verdict afterwards". The decision of Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich was clearly wrong.  Ehrich had used the Penalty and Sentences Act, in his words, to "get rid of it", prior to the establishment of guilt. Ehrich was half an hour late to court that day and dealt with this charge, in a hurry, first off. Clearly he had been caucusing on this charge, possibly with the then police solicitor having conduct of this charge Colin Strofield, who was not in couirt that day. At the swearing in of Strofield as a Magistrate at  BRISBANE on 06/03/2008

I quote:

"It is in this capacity as Queensland Police Service solicitor that I, [Judge Marshall Irwin] and other Magistrates, have had a close contact with his Honour [Magistrate Colin John Strofield] because he was the principal point of liaison for us with the Queensland Police Service and as a result it has been possible to resolve a number of 'issues', which obviously arise from time to time in the administration of a Court which relate to the Queensland Police Service in the mutual interests of both the Court, the Police Service and the community [as clearly an afterthought, having a sense of what he was saying] through Colin's involvement and his advice and the application of the common sense  which I have mentioned previously."

So caucusing is now called "liaison".

Judge Marshall Irwin was then Chief Magistrate and was a Judge of the District Court, which role he still has,  

However, District Court Judge Leanne Clare tried to dismiss my appeal against Ehrich's decision, as if there was nothing wrong with the conduct of Ehrich.  Further, Clare DCJ approved of the conduct of Ehrich although the Court of Appeal later described his conduct as "egregious".

For these reasons and District Court associations, I submit that a reasonably informed bystander would reasonably form an apprehension of bias in the District Court, so preventing my gaining a fair hearing, despite appearances, from any DCJ. 

These charges have sprung from the basic reason and cause in that I am disabled.  These are cover-up of cover-up of cover-up of original disability discrimination and defrauding of me because I am disabled.

Because so much information is involved in this matter and cases, and because I have brain damage, I have adopted ICT technology to alleviate the effects of my disabilities. 

Because a large part of the evidence relates to Magistrate Kluck not extending me Due Process as he denied accommodation of my special needs so denying my having a fair hearing, I have summarized the transcripts coram Kluck for the three days of hearing and also the ten subsequent  mentions and the FIVE prior mentions, online.   That the transcripts are accurate can be determined by comparison of the transcripst online with my additional Anchors summarising the content, to the offical SRB transcript.

Hence, my submission is the html form of my emailed submission which thus includes all the content to which it is linked by URLs and the content to which those pages are in turn linked by further URLs aka hyperlinks, should all be classed as my submission today..

I incorporate my four prior submissions, for this appeal and for the related Purported referral to the District Court per Sec20B Crimes Act 1914, as listed immediately below, in their entirety, AS HTML files and so including all hyperlinked content, into this submission, as if they had been copied and pasted into this submission, AS HTML files and so including all hyperlinked content, which itself is also included as html, also into this submission.
  1. Submission #0001:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  2. Submission #0002:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  3. Initial General Submission to District Court coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien AO for mention 28th January, 2011
  4. Submission #0003 in Registrar's Reference; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 10AM 4th March, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read &
I produce in this way to alleviate the effects of my disability.  This is an accommodation of my Special Needs.

I have put a great amount of time into the preparation of these summaries.  I have done this over an extended period of time, in short intervals when my concentration permitted.  Due to my disability I am unable to reformat this into a linear paper copy or even a linear copy to email or print into a pdf form.  I am unable due to my brain damage disability to reproduce this verbally, in real time.

The Transcripts and summaries by listing of anchors are online at:

Transcripts of Hearing days on which witnesses gave evidence, with Summaries as Menus of Anchors/Markers:

  1. Summary of this Case of Fraud by Queensland Police &Commonwealth DPP
  2. Index:
  3. *Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  4. *Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  5. *Day 3: 28th June, 2010

Transcripts of related Mentions, after the truncation of the committal; ['*' preceding links below means that that transcript is preceded by  a 'Summary' which is a Menu of Anchors/Markers:]

  1. Day 00:   9th June, 2010
  2. *Day 04: 29th June, 2010
  3. *Day 05: 30th June, 2010
  4. *Day 06:     1st July, 2010
  5. *Day 07:    9th July, 2010
  6. *Day 08: 10th August, 2010
  7. *Day 09:    1st September, 2010
  8. *Day 10:   8th September, 2010
  9.  * Day 11: 15th September, 2010
  10. Day 12: 22th September, 2010
  11. Day 13: 24th September, 2010

Transcripts for Pre-Trial Mentions, coram various magistrates:

  1. Day A: 14th September, 2009
  2. Day B: 2nd November, 2009
  3. Day C: 25th January, 2010
  4. Day D: 15th March, 2010.

If DCJ O'Brien purports to hear this appeal, I request he recuse himself on the basis that as Judge Administrator of the District Court, His Honour works closely with the Chief DCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe.

Firstly, I require that His Honour DCJ O'Brien should recuse himself for Apprehended Bias.

Because, on 15 September 2008 Judge Kerry John O’Brien was sworn in as Judge Administrator of the District Court, His Honour works closely with the Chief DCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe.  Because  DC Judge Kerry John O’Brien is Judge Administrator, His Honour works more closely with the Chief DCJ, that does any other DCJ.  A reasonably informed bystander would form a reasonable apprehension of bias by His Honour DCJ O'Brien towards me, because of that close working relationship with CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe.   As detailed on this site, CDCJ Patsy Mary Wolfe has acted in particularly evil malpractice towards me in 1992, when she was a barrister.

Additionally, you have been appointed by the Queensland Government, to a position in the judicial arm of the Queensland Government and I have been defrauded of my owned house and land that was my home, by the Queensland Government with the assistance of an Armed Robbery of me of my possessions as a step in the furtherance of that fraud of me of my home, by the Qld Government, in the persons of police Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony where this corruption is now of Rantala-Gate:  fame.   If anyone tries to argue that I have not been defrauded of my house, please explain the reason for, and purpose of, the ARMED ROBBERY.   That an ARMED ROBBERY occurred is not merely a matter of evidence, but a matter of law.  The fact that these charges have arisen is further evidence that the fraud was so deliberate, and criminal.

It is clear that the  Brisbane City Council [BCC] and Qld Police intended to enter under the provisions of the Health Act 1937.  It is clear from the evidence of Rantala,.there was no court order permitting anyone to enter my property.  It is a matter of law, per sec 160 Health Act, 1937, that in the absence of permission of the landholder, a court order is necessary in the circumstances pertaining at that time..  You can see in the letter per BCC which is also, I believe, in evidence before this court, that the Queensland Government Statutory Authority, being Brisbane City Council were purporting to declare that they had authority by virtue of a Section of a Regulation ie Section 200 of the Regulation to the Health Act 1937.  It is a clear matter of law that a section of a regulation cannot over ride a section of a Statute ie Sect 160(2) Health Act.1937, or a Common Law right, the Right to be heard also legislated in Sect 160(2) Health Act.1937.  This whole legal action by Qld police and the CDPP is a continuation of the cover-up of a criminal fraud, which occurred because I am severely disabled.  The Queensland Courts are being used to perpetrate a fraud, breach of fiduciary duties, and disability discrimination. 


Magistrate Kluck denied me Due Process in that he denied me a fair hearing because he denied me accommodation of  my special need.  

Excess Evidence that Magistrate Paul M Kluck Denied Me Due Process

On the first day, Magistrate Kluck ridiculed me and my disability. Kluck denied me accommodation of my special needs although he has admitted he knew my brain damage disability was adversely affecting my performance in court for all three days.  

Further evidence and legal argument is detailed in the links from this menu.

One needs only read the transcripts coram Kluck as at
  1. Summary of this Case of Fraud by Queensland Police &Commonwealth DPP
  2. Index:
  3. Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  4. Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  5. Day 3: 28th June, 2010


BENCH: All right. So, 11 a.m. Anything else there?


DEFENDANT: Could I just ask, your Honour, for - basically as I see it there are - apart from the four websites, there are basically two     


BENCH: So, have you got your thoughts back together again, Mr Mathews?


DEFENDANT: I'm just trying - something else I already thought about, previously, your Honour.



Magistrate Kluck at mentions when I was not present after the three days when I attended in June 2010, commented to Shane Hunter how I wouldl stand mute at the bar table for many minutes at a time.

I seek the leave of the court to lead more evidence.





I desire the text of my email justification for the issue of the two subpoenas that have been issued, to be on the record so I include it here in my submission:

from Russell Mathews 
to "Neil Hansen, Senior Deputy Registrar, Appeals Jurisdiction, Supreme and District Courts, Queensland." <Neil.Hansen@justice.qld.gov.au>
bcc
date Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:58 PM
subject Two subpoenas with justification:
mailed-by gmail.com

hide details May 5 (8 days ago)

G'day Mr Hansen,
Attached to this communique are the two subpoenas I desire issued.  The content of the text following justifies my calling these two witnesses.  I would expect that they will both be hostile witnesses.  Each would not appear without a subpoena.

Not only has the conduct of the committal hearing denied me Due Process as I had been denied a Fair Hearing as my Special Needs had not been accommodated, but the prosecution of me is also Disability Discrimination, by forcing me to engage in a committal hearing and to defend myself on baseless charges, in an attempt to put police and others who have committed crimes against me because it was easier because I was disabled, isolated and vulnerable, in the clear.  This amounts to Disability Discrimination and is illegal per the DDA and the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities & UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which is law in this case as the CDPP, a Commonwealth of Australia agency, is involved..

After the court has realized that the committal hearing in the Magistrates Court coram Kluck had long become void due to the denial of Due Process to me, the court must decide what to do with these charges.

The court has before it as part of what it has been downloaded from the internet by police, a letter to me from Joanne Whiting, Brisbane City Legal Practice dated 25th November, 2004, disclosing their purported authority to enter my premises where I had exclusive possession.  In fact they had no authority.  That letter already before the District Court is prima facia evidence. 

That letter is currently online at
http://haigreport.com/20041125BCCentrynotice_cr01.jpg /.  I have also attached a scan of this letter.

I wish to have Joanne Whiting produce their copy of the document so that the veracity of the letter cannot be questioned.   This purported "authority" was a fraud based upon a ruse for which a barrister's opinion was to be central.  In that letter Joanne Whiting waives Client privilege.  Wayne Tolton produced the barrister's opinion.  Wayne Tolton can give evidence, as to the nature of the ruse.  Both the barrister's opinion and the evidence of Wayne Tolton will each add strength to the proposition of the barrister's opinion was part of the artifice.

The Armed robbery by the Police Rantala and Antony and the Ruse created by the Brisbane City Legal Practice in conjunction with Wayne Tolton was for the purpose of defrauding me of my equitable interest in my house and land at 254 Hawken Drive.  I have already discovered by FOI of Brisbane City Council [BCC], in external review by the Information Commissioner that this legal advice was provided by Wayne Tolton. 

Parties involved in this fraud included the Queensland Government, Qld Government authorities including the Brisbane City Council, and The University of Queensland, and the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane aka the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church of which the current Chief Justice Paul de Jersey is Chancellor and has been at all relevant times of this fraud of me.  The legal title of my house and land is now in the name of Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane and I have been excluded from my beneficial interest by the Queensland Government, being Qld Police.  One pivotal node has been Douglas Porter who was at all relevant times the Registrar of The University of Queensland and Chair of the St Johns College Council, in conjuction with other representatives of Paul de Jersey's Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane.  I am excluded from my house and land by the Queensland government so my house and land can be used to jointly benefit the Queensland Government Authority named The University of Queensland [who had repeatedly cheated me in major ways over the two decades prior - and each involving Douglas Porter], and the Chief Justice Paul de Jersey's Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Chuerch aka the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane [CSDB].

Part of the reason for the illegal entry was to expedite the clearing my yard of my possessions so my house and land could be jointly used by The Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC] aka CSDB, and the University of Queensland for the 2005 Academic year.

An additional part of the reason for the Queensland Government's illegal armed entry to my property and armed robbery of my possessions from me was to concoct "evidence" to purport to exclude me from my property, to appear as if the "Rule of Law" had been followed, so Paul de Jersey's favoured "charity" could enjoy possession of my property stolen from me.  Joanne Whiting is in a position to give evidence pertaining to this, as reasons for the imperative that entry to my property be gained, without going to court for the mandatory Court Order per Sec 160.Health Act, 1937.


These two witnesses are central to establishing the massive extent of the discrimination and fraud of me because I am disabled, and thus the reason that these charges should be dismissed..

Please advise.
--
********************************************************************
Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA     

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of

      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND

Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html
*******************************************************************
3 attachments — Download all attachments  
20041125BCCentrynotice_cr01.jpg 20041125BCCentrynotice_cr01.jpg
104K   View   Download  
20110503DistrictCourtSubpoenaJoanneWhitingBrisbaneCityLegalPracticeFormCPR-f-21-20070712.pdf 20110503DistrictCourtSubpoenaJoanneWhitingBrisbaneCityLegalPracticeFormCPR-f-21-20070712.pdf
17K   View   Download  
20110503DistrictCourtSubpoenaWayneToltonFormCPR-f-21-20070712.pdf 20110503DistrictCourtSubpoenaWayneToltonFormCPR-f-21-20070712.pdf
23K   View   Download  

I also require that my email request regarding advice of how my Special Needs will be accommodated, be included in my submission, so it is available to any superior court to whcih this is appealed.   The uncertainty caused by no response to my request exacebates and aggravates the difficulties I experience because of my brain damage disability.

Formal advice to the court that I am disabled, and request of how my Special Needs will be accommodated.

|
from Russell Mathews 
to "Neil Hansen, Senior Deputy Registrar, Appeals Jurisdiction, Supreme and District Courts, Queensland." <Neil.Hansen@justice.qld.gov.au>
cc "Dr Rob Moyle, Silverton Place, 101 Wickham Tce, Brisbane." <robmoyle@bigpond.com>


date Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:00 AM
subject Formal advice to the court that I am disabled, and request of how my Special Needs will be accommodated.
mailed-by gmail.com

hide details May 10 (3 days ago)

Dr R. Moyle: FYI

G'day Mr Hansen,
I am bringing notice of my multiple disabilities to the District Court.   My Disabilities include substantial brain damage.  As a result, I live a reclusive lifestyle.  I am unable to anticipate how I will perform in a new or novel situation, so I avoid such and live my reclusive lifestyle.

I mentally fatigue very quickly.  When I have to perform other then my reclusive lifestyle, I experience mental exhaustion, such that I am unable to rise from my bed. I cannot work full time or do anything on a full time basis.

I am unable to argue verbally in real time.  I perform better in writing as I can prepare over a longer time period and can review and re-review what I have written.

The court must extend to me Due Process aka Natural Justice.  That includes my being extended a Fair Hearing.  To have a fair hearing, my special needs resulting from my disabilities must be accommodated.  The onus is upon the court to extend to me Due Process.  I submit that the court must know that I am being given a fair hearing; that I am, in real time, receiving a fair hearing..  I submit that the court cannot gamble that I am receiving a fair hearing, and assess whether that is the case, in retrospect.. 

Often, I am unaware in real time that I am experiencing difficulties due to my disabilities including my brain damage disability.  Often it is only in retrospect that I realize I was experiencing adverse effects from my disabilities.

I am unable to know how I will perform in a new or novel situation.  I am not an expert.

Uncertainty as to the future, because of my disability causes me great anxiety.   Hence, I wish to know in advance how my Special Needs will be accommodated in the District Court.  I really fear being repeatedly railroaded as I was coram Magistrate Kluck.  "ask another question",  "ask another question",  "ask another question",  "ask another question",  "ask another question",  ;

I am disabled.  I am not an expert to know fully all the ramifications of my disabilities.   Because the onus is upon the court, it is not my responsibility to produce the expert witnesses and testimony.  It is the responsibility of the Court.  I submit such should be done in a co-operative fashion with me.

I submit further that it is not my responsibility to produce sworn evidence of my disabilities so that the court can honour its onus.   I submit that the court should avail itself of expert evidence in a preliminary hearing, a type of voir dire, as to the nature of my disabilities, the special Needs resulting from that to ensure the court knows in real time, that I am receiving a fair hearing by having my Special Needs accommodated.

I submit that because of the onus being upon the court to extend to me Due Process and a Fair Hearing, then, if the court becomes aware of my disabilities, by any means, including just observation, it must proceed to ensure I receive a fair hearing.  I am advising the court of my disabilities to ensure it becomes aware of my disabilities.  This process is separate and different to a determination of whether I am fit to stand trial.

I submit is is Disability Discrimination to make it an ordeal for me to ensure I receive a fair hearing by having my special needs accommodated.

--
********************************************************************
Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA     

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of

      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND

Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html
*******************************************************************
 I included further relevant information:
From Neil Hansen Neil.Hansen@justice.qld.gov.au
to Russell Mathews
date Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:34 AM
subject RE: Formal advice to the court that I am disabled, and request of how my Special Needs will be accommodated.
mailed-by justice.qld.gov.au

hide details May 10 (3 days ago)

Thank you Mr Mathews for the email which I have forwarded to the Judge's associate to be brought to the attention of the judge.  Can you please confirm that you will be personally attending next week's hearing.
 
Thanks

Neil Hansen | Team Leader - Senior Deputy Registrar | Appeals Jurisdiction

Supreme District and Land Courts Service | Queensland Courts

Ph: 3247 4787 | Ext: 74787 | Fax: (07) 3247 5339
Email: neil.hansen@justice.qld.gov.au

 


From: Russell Mathews
Sent: Tuesday, 10 May 2011 11:00 AM
To: Neil Hansen
Cc: Dr Rob Moyle, Silverton Place, 101 Wickham Tce, Brisbane.
Subject: Formal advice to the court that I am disabled, and request of how my Special Needs will be accommodated.

- Show quoted text -
Dr R. Moyle: FYI

G'day Mr Hansen,
I am bringing notice of my multiple disabilities to the District Court.   My Disabilities include substantial brain damage.  As a result, I live a reclusive lifestyle.  I am unable to anticipate how I will perform in a new or novel situation, so I avoid such and live my reclusive lifestyle.

I mentally fatigue very quickly.  When I have to perform other then my reclusive lifestyle, I experience mental exhaustion, such that I am unable to rise from my bed. I cannot work full time or do anything on a full time basis.

I am unable to argue verbally in real time.  I perform better in writing as I can prepare over a longer time period and can review and re-review what I have written.

The court must extend to me Due Process aka Natural Justice.  That includes my being extended a Fair Hearing.  To have a fair hearing, my special needs resulting from my disabilities must be accommodated.  The onus is upon the court to extend to me Due Process.  I submit that the court must know that I am being given a fair hearing; that I am, in real time, receiving a fair hearing..  I submit that the court cannot gamble that I am receiving a fair hearing, and assess whether that is the case, in retrospect.. 

Often, I am unaware in real time that I am experiencing difficulties due to my disabilities including my brain damage disability.  Often it is only in retrospect that I realize I was experiencing adverse effects from my disabilities.

I am unable to know how I will perform in a new or novel situation.  I am not an expert.

Uncertainty as to the future, because of my disability causes me great anxiety.   Hence, I wish to know in advance how my Special Needs will be accommodated in the District Court.  I really fear being repeatedly railroaded as I was coram Magistrate Kluck.  "ask another question",  "ask another question",  "ask another question",  "ask another question",  "ask another question",  ;

I am disabled.  I am not an expert to know fully all the ramifications of my disabilities.   Because the onus is upon the court, it is not my responsibility to produce the expert witnesses and testimony.  It is the responsibility of the Court.  I submit such should be done in a co-operative fashion with me.

I submit further that it is not my responsibility to produce sworn evidence of my disabilities so that the court can honour its onus.   I submit that the court should avail itself of expert evidence in a preliminary hearing, a type of voir dire, as to the nature of my disabilities, the special Needs resulting from that to ensure the court knows in real time, that I am receiving a fair hearing by having my Special Needs accommodated.

I submit that because of the onus being upon the court to extend to me Due Process and a Fair Hearing, then, if the court becomes aware of my disabilities, by any means, including just observation, it must proceed to ensure I receive a fair hearing.  I am advising the court of my disabilities to ensure it becomes aware of my disabilities.  This process is separate and different to a determination of whether I am fit to stand trial.

I submit is is Disability Discrimination to make it an ordeal for me to ensure I receive a fair hearing by having my special needs accommodated.

--
********************************************************************
Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA     

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of

      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND

Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html
*******************************************************************
 
|

show details May 10 (3 days ago)

G'day Mr Hansen,.
I will require a satisfactory response from the court as the next step in this process.

RM





On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Neil Hansen <Neil.Hansen@justice.qld.gov.au> wrote:
Thank you Mr Mathews for the email which I have forwarded to the Judge's associate to be brought to the attention of the judge.  Can you please confirm that you will be personally attending next week's hearing.
 
Thanks

Neil Hansen | Team Leader - Senior Deputy Registrar | Appeals Jurisdiction

Supreme District and Land Courts Service | Queensland Courts

Ph: 3247 4787 | Ext: 74787 | Fax: (07) 3247 5339
Email: neil.hansen@justice.qld.gov.au

 


From: Russell Mathews
Sent: Tuesday, 10 May 2011 11:00 AM
To: Neil Hansen
Cc: Dr Rob Moyle, Silverton Place, 101 Wickham Tce, Brisbane.
Subject: Formal advice to the court that I am disabled, and request of how my Special Needs will be accommodated.

Dr R. Moyle: FYI

G'day Mr Hansen,
I am bringing notice of my multiple disabilities to the District Court.   My Disabilities include substantial brain damage.  As a result, I live a reclusive lifestyle.  I am unable to anticipate how I will perform in a new or novel situation, so I avoid such and live my reclusive lifestyle.

I mentally fatigue very quickly.  When I have to perform other then my reclusive lifestyle, I experience mental exhaustion, such that I am unable to rise from my bed. I cannot work full time or do anything on a full time basis.

I am unable to argue verbally in real time.  I perform better in writing as I can prepare over a longer time period and can review and re-review what I have written.

The court must extend to me Due Process aka Natural Justice.  That includes my being extended a Fair Hearing.  To have a fair hearing, my special needs resulting from my disabilities must be accommodated.  The onus is upon the court to extend to me Due Process.  I submit that the court must know that I am being given a fair hearing; that I am, in real time, receiving a fair hearing..  I submit that the court cannot gamble that I am receiving a fair hearing, and assess whether that is the case, in retrospect.. 

Often, I am unaware in real time that I am experiencing difficulties due to my disabilities including my brain damage disability.  Often it is only in retrospect that I realize I was experiencing adverse effects from my disabilities.

I am unable to know how I will perform in a new or novel situation.  I am not an expert.

Uncertainty as to the future, because of my disability causes me great anxiety.   Hence, I wish to know in advance how my Special Needs will be accommodated in the District Court.  I really fear being repeatedly railroaded as I was coram Magistrate Kluck.  "ask another question",  "ask another question",  "ask another question",  "ask another question",  "ask another question",  ;

I am disabled.  I am not an expert to know fully all the ramifications of my disabilities.   Because the onus is upon the court, it is not my responsibility to produce the expert witnesses and testimony.  It is the responsibility of the Court.  I submit such should be done in a co-operative fashion with me.

I submit further that it is not my responsibility to produce sworn evidence of my disabilities so that the court can honour its onus.   I submit that the court should avail itself of expert evidence in a preliminary hearing, a type of voir dire, as to the nature of my disabilities, the special Needs resulting from that to ensure the court knows in real time, that I am receiving a fair hearing by having my Special Needs accommodated.

I submit that because of the onus being upon the court to extend to me Due Process and a Fair Hearing, then, if the court becomes aware of my disabilities, by any means, including just observation, it must proceed to ensure I receive a fair hearing.  I am advising the court of my disabilities to ensure it becomes aware of my disabilities.  This process is separate and different to a determination of whether I am fit to stand trial.

I submit is is Disability Discrimination to make it an ordeal for me to ensure I receive a fair hearing by having my special needs accommodated.

--
********************************************************************
Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA     

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of

      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND

Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html
*******************************************************************




--
********************************************************************
Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA     

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of

      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND

Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html

|
Russell Mathews to Merrilyn, William, Neil
show details 12:28 PM (46 minutes ago)

G'day Mr Hansen,
I am disabled.  I have many weaknesses whereby I have to adopt strategies to to adapt and cope.  This prosecution is occurring because I am disabled and it is to cover-up the fraud by many including the police and Brisbane City Council and the Qld Government, that was perpetrated because I am disabled, and was disabled at that time. 

I have to minimize the amount of thinking I have to do so, I cannot abide uncertainty.  That was the purpose of this earlier email.  I have had no response.  I traveled to the CBD on Tuesday to serve the Subpoena on Joanne Whiting.  That so fatigued and mentally exhausted me, that it took me over one day to recover.  

Since I have had no response, I will appear by phone on Monday.  I expect problems with the Subpoena I served on Joanne Whiting as I believe the senior officer of Brisbane City Legal Service one David Askern has attempted to frustrate my service of that subpoena.

Please advise a phone number on which I may phone in on Monday next at 10am.   I will forward my submission or submissions later to this email contact and to the CDPP.

Russell Mathews.



On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Russell Mathews  wrote:
G'day Mr Hansen,.
I will require a satisfactory response from the court as the next step in this process.

RM




On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Neil Hansen <Neil.Hansen@justice.qld.gov.au> wrote:
Thank you Mr Mathews for the email which I have forwarded to the Judge's associate to be brought to the attention of the judge.  Can you please confirm that you will be personally attending next week's hearing.
 
Thanks

Neil Hansen | Team Leader - Senior Deputy Registrar | Appeals Jurisdiction

Supreme District and Land Courts Service | Queensland Courts

Ph: 3247 4787 | Ext: 74787 | Fax: (07) 3247 5339
Email: neil.hansen@justice.qld.gov.au

 


From: Russell Mathews
Sent: Tuesday, 10 May 2011 11:00 AM
To: Neil Hansen
Cc: Dr Rob Moyle, Silverton Place, 101 Wickham Tce, Brisbane.
Subject: Formal advice to the court that I am disabled, and request of how my Special Needs will be accommodated.

Dr R. Moyle: FYI

G'day Mr Hansen,
I am bringing notice of my multiple disabilities to the District Court.   My Disabilities include substantial brain damage.  As a result, I live a reclusive lifestyle.  I am unable to anticipate how I will perform in a new or novel situation, so I avoid such and live my reclusive lifestyle.

I mentally fatigue very quickly.  When I have to perform other then my reclusive lifestyle, I experience mental exhaustion, such that I am unable to rise from my bed. I cannot work full time or do anything on a full time basis.

I am unable to argue verbally in real time.  I perform better in writing as I can prepare over a longer time period and can review and re-review what I have written.

The court must extend to me Due Process aka Natural Justice.  That includes my being extended a Fair Hearing.  To have a fair hearing, my special needs resulting from my disabilities must be accommodated.  The onus is upon the court to extend to me Due Process.  I submit that the court must know that I am being given a fair hearing; that I am, in real time, receiving a fair hearing..  I submit that the court cannot gamble that I am receiving a fair hearing, and assess whether that is the case, in retrospect.. 

Often, I am unaware in real time that I am experiencing difficulties due to my disabilities including my brain damage disability.  Often it is only in retrospect that I realize I was experiencing adverse effects from my disabilities.

I am unable to know how I will perform in a new or novel situation.  I am not an expert.

Uncertainty as to the future, because of my disability causes me great anxiety.   Hence, I wish to know in advance how my Special Needs will be accommodated in the District Court.  I really fear being repeatedly railroaded as I was coram Magistrate Kluck.  "ask another question",  "ask another question",  "ask another question",  "ask another question",  "ask another question",  ;

I am disabled.  I am not an expert to know fully all the ramifications of my disabilities.   Because the onus is upon the court, it is not my responsibility to produce the expert witnesses and testimony.  It is the responsibility of the Court.  I submit such should be done in a co-operative fashion with me.

I submit further that it is not my responsibility to produce sworn evidence of my disabilities so that the court can honour its onus.   I submit that the court should avail itself of expert evidence in a preliminary hearing, a type of voir dire, as to the nature of my disabilities, the special Needs resulting from that to ensure the court knows in real time, that I am receiving a fair hearing by having my Special Needs accommodated.

I submit that because of the onus being upon the court to extend to me Due Process and a Fair Hearing, then, if the court becomes aware of my disabilities, by any means, including just observation, it must proceed to ensure I receive a fair hearing.  I am advising the court of my disabilities to ensure it becomes aware of my disabilities.  This process is separate and different to a determination of whether I am fit to stand trial.

I submit is is Disability Discrimination to make it an ordeal for me to ensure I receive a fair hearing by having my special needs accommodated.

--
********************************************************************
Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA     

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of

      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND

Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html
*******************************************************************



--
********************************************************************
Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA     

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of

      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND

Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html
*******************************************************************

 
|
Neil Hansen to me
show details 12:35 PM (38 minutes ago)

Good Afternoon Mr Mathews,
 
I have forwarded your email to the judge for him to decide whether you can appear by phone.  I will advise the result.
 
Regards

Neil Hansen | Team Leader - Senior Deputy Registrar | Appeals Jurisdiction

Supreme District and Land Courts Service | Queensland Courts

Ph: 3247 4787 | Ext: 74787 | Fax: (07) 3247 5339
Email: neil.hansen@justice.qld.gov.au

The Fair Hearing imperative of Due Process for a disabled person with Special Needs, requires Accommodation of those Special Needs and does not have the reasonable Accommodations exception of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities available to it.

The CDPP's Shane Hunter is on record stating that the accommodations [of special needs], must be "reasonable" according to UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

It appears that Shane Hunter has a very limited depth of thinking.  He is saying that the court could deny me accommodation of my special needs by stating that such accommodation would not be reasonable or justifiable.  If Shane Hunter had just thought a little deeper, he would have realized that if the court then held that the accommodation of my Special Needs was unreasonable for being too inconvenient or expensive to extend, then the court would be deliberately denying  me DUE PROCESS.    Hence, when a court or tribunal must ensure a Fair Hearing, of Due Process aka Natural Justice and also abide by the
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, it does not have available to it the exception to the imperative of Accommodating Special Needs of disabled persons, of reasonableness, as the Fair hearing of Due Process is an absolute concept.      

Interaction of Fitness to Stand Trial and Accommodation of Special Needs

This attempted concealment by the Commonwealth of Australia [by the CDPP] of Exploitation [stealing house and land that was my home], of a disabled person [ME] by the Australian Public/Government Sector [The University of Qld, plus the public body of which the Chief Justice of Qld Paul de jersey is Chancellor, plus Queensland Police and plus the Brisbane City Council, ], is itself exploitation of the disabled by the Commonwealth of Australia.
  1. The Onus was on Kluck, and is now on the District Court, to ensure that the hearing is a Fair Hearing by a Fair Tribunal. This includes for any “meeting” in the District Court purporting to be a “hearing” re this purported and void Sec 20B referral.

  2. This means that as I am disabled, all of my Special Needs must be accommodated by the Court.

  3. If they are not and the CDPP proceed, then the CDPP is in brieach of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities & UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities /.
  4. Some of my special needs impinge upon my receiving a “fair hearing”. I am sure the Court will agree that indicia in R v Presser are pertinent

  5. The indicia of these standards are:
    1. An ability to understand the basic nature of the charge.
    2. An ability to plead to the charge and exercise a right of challenge.
    3. An ability to generally understand the nature of the proceedings, ie that there is to be an inquiry as to whether the accused did what is charged with doing.
    4. An ability to follow the course of the proceedings, although not in any sense requiring a particular competence in doing so, ie “to understand what is going on in court in a general sense”.
    5. An ability to understand “the substantial effect” of evidence against him.
    6. An ability to “make his defence or answer the charge”.
    7. An ability to instruct counsel in the sense of “letting counsel know what his version of the facts is and, if necessary, telling the court what it is”.


When I am fatigued and mentally exhausted, my ability to "make my defence and answer the charge", are greatly diminished.  This indicates a Special Need I have because of my brain damage disability, which Special Need must be accommodated.  Importantly, it can be accommodated.     

Hence, the purported referral per Sec20B Crimes Act 1914 by Kluck is an admission by Kluck that he had denied me accommodation of my Special Needs.  That referral is void ab initio as Kluck had been sitting on a nullity for some time: from before the 29th June, 2010 at which date, I was unable to rise from my bed in the morning due to mental exhaustion due to my being repeatedly railroaded when fatigued by Magistrate Kluck, over the previous three sitting days.

What the Court should thus do, with these charges.

The evidence that Joanne Whiting & Wayne Tolton can provide:

Joanne Whiting composed and signed the letter that is currently online at
http://haigreport.com/20041125BCCentrynotice_cr01.jpg and is in the evidence before the court.

I insert a copy of the scan now online right here:
http://haigreport.com/20041125BCCentrynotice_cr01.jpg

 Joanne Whiting can confirm that that is her signature and that she did in fact composed and send that letter.  She can also produce her copy of that letter to the court to confirm the veracity of that scanned image of that letter/.  That letter shows they were acting pursuant to the Health Regulation 1996 which is the Regulation to the Health Act 1937.  It is a matter of law that a court order is required in those circumstances and that they did not have a court order, as confirmed by Henri Rantala under oath coram Magistrate Kluck on 28th June, 2010.  I refer the court to the legal reasoning on the evidence before the court from the website.

In that letter, Joanne Whiting on behalf of the Brisbane City Council [BCC] waived Client Privilege to the barristers report of Wayne Tolton.  I have already received part of the barrister's opinion under FOI, but the Information Commissioner wrongly permitted the BCC to delete part of the barrister's opinion.  That FOI release included the author of the barrister's opinion as Wayne Tolton.  Consideration of the full barrister's opinion will confirm that that it was for the purpose of creating a ruse and artifice so the BCC could pretend that they had authority to enter my exclusively held property.  Wayne Tolton can also advise of the circumstances under which the opinion was obtained.  I will wish to cross examine both witnesses, as they are both hostile witnesses, to have this evidence produced.

These basic charges are an abuse of process by Shane Hunter of the Commonwealth DPP.   The fact that I am disabled means these charges are also discrimination against me on the basis of my disability.
In my Initial General Submission to District Court coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien AO for mention 28th January, 2011: I mentioned numerous highly relevant aspects.  The District Court Transcript: of the  Mention on 28th January, 2011 shows that Your Honour apparently found my submission a too lengthy document to read, and accordingly Your Honour asked Shane Hunter To Interpret And Filter My Submission for yourself, especially as to what was relevant.  Shane Hunter is clearly at least biased, [he is prosecuting an abuse of process and concurrently discriminating against me on the basis of my disability], but has Advocates Immunity.  Shane Hunter should have resisted the temptation to continue his discrimination against me on the basis of my disability..  His accession to Your Honour's request, was, I submit, further disability Discrimination of me by Shane Hunter.  As Your Honour was, on the occasion of 28th January, 2011, adverse to reading my submission, I shall keep this short, and further, record my reading of it, put that audio recording Online on the Internet, and refer the District Court Registry to the URL of the recording as well as the text of this Appearance by me and Submission.  Any internet visitor who happens upon this recording and wishes to view all documentation, I suggest they <Google Haigreport District Court Kerry O'Brien D3095 forward slash 10>.

I refer Your Honour to the Initial General Submission to District Court coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien AO for mention 28th January, 2011, which I hereby incorporate in this submission and do require it to be on the record.

The District Court should, as a first step, ensure that My Special Needs consequent upon my Disability are accommodated.  Further, the District Court should ensure that as the CDPP is appearing before this court, and the CDPP is subject to  UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, then this District Court is also subject to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities while the CDPP is appearing before it.  If the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is not honoured, then the District Court could well be permitting the Commonwealth of Australia to break the law. It cannot permit anyone to break the law.  This is further detailed in my previously referenced Initial General Submission to District Court.

I have substantial brain damage.  I fatigue very readily and quickly.  I have to cope.  To cope, I live my life as a simple routine.  Any disruption of that simple routine has a devastating effect upon me, and amounts to unlawful disability discrimination of me.  My computer, broadband and the Internet is my major disability aid and a major part of my routine.  

Because I am disabled with brain damage, I have been the target and subject of repeated acts of discrimination and fraud.   This has included by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission [HREOC] as it was circa 1990, under the auspices of Quentin Bryce.. The HREOC, under the auspices of Quentin Bryce, perpetrated fraud against me coram Kevin Patrick O'Connor in a HREOC tribunal, when he was Privacy commissioner.  In 1992 in the Federal Court, I sought Judicial Review per ADJR, coram Jeffrey Ernest John Spender, when Quentin Bryce was a defendant,  Patsy Mary Wolfe, then a barrister, and close personal friend of Quentin Bryce, appeared as counsel for HREOC and others.  Patsy Wolfe breached professional conduct, caucused with Spender, and committed major malpractice to my detriment, and to give me an undeserved bad reputation.  The Present CDCJ Wolfe would not be expected to wish her professional misconduct to become public.   Other people are aware of this and have continually acted against my interests no doubt to weaken me to prevent CDCJ Wolfe's previous malpractice coram Spender becoming public.    I am determined that CDCJ Wolfe's previous malpractice coram Spender will become public.  Because of Your Honour's being Judge Administrator, a reasonably informed bystander would expect that Your Honour would have the closest profession relationship to the Chief DCJ of any DCJ, and as on the public record you both have a mutually respectful relationship, that bystander could reasonably expect that Your Honour would have a higher regard for her that could affect Your Honour's judgment.

includedSummaryCaseFraudPoliceAndCDPP.php

Summary of the case by the Criminal, corrupt & FRAUDULENT Qld police AGAINST Disabled Old Man

This is the case where corrupt police and a corrupt Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, attempt to use brute force, of police arrest and harassment to silence the disabled old man, to conceal how the Queensland police performed an Armed Robbery on him to Assist the Queensland Government defraud the disabled old man of his house and land that he owned and which was his home.

The disabled old man has brain damage caused by severe head injury when a teenager.  That affects his ability to "work" for any but short time periods.  He is able to concentrate for only short periods. This is near impossible for a casual observer to notice.  He quickly becomes fatigued and if he is forced to continue to try to concentrate, that results in mental exhaustion.  On the first day of hearing, knowing the disabled old man's disability and the nature of it, Magistrate Klutz ridiculed the disabled old man, even though the disabled old man was trying hard to accommodate what the Magistrate desired.   CLEARLY, THE DISABLED OLD MAN MUST REFUSE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS, UNLESS AND UNTIL HIS SPECIAL NEEDS CONSEQUENT UPON HIS DISABILITIES ARE FULLY ACCOMMODATED.   THIS IS ESSENTIAL IF HE IS TO RECEIVE DUE PROCESS.  THE ONUS IS UPON THE MAGISTRATE, JUDGE AND DECISION MAKER, TO ENSURE THAT THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS EXTENDED DUE PROCESS aka NATURAL JUSTICE.

THE DISABLED OLD MAN IS HAPPY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL PROCESS PROVIDED HE RECEIVES DUE PROCESS. 

The real crux of this fraud upon the disabled old man and concurrently, UPON THE JUSTICE AND LEGAL SYSTEM OF QUEENSLAND AND AUSTRALIA, is that this disabled old man is being prosecuted in the most contemptuous way, to continue the EXPLOITATION OF HIS BEING DISABLED BY THE QUEENSLAND GOVERNMENT, in that the Queensland Government, defrauded/stole from the disabled old man, the house and land that he owned that was his home, for the use of and by The University of Queensland.  The clandestine fraud was orchestrated by the Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  The fraud involved an ARMED ROBBERY of the disabled old man by Queensland Police in company with a Queensland government Authority, for the benefit of another Queensland Government authority viz, The University of Queensland. The case involved a fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man. The same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala also charged the disabled old man with other charges to favour The University of Queensland, who had been defrauding the disabled old man for years.  ..

Instead of the Australian government doing as it should to honour its International Commitments [
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]] to rail against exploitation of disabled persons, it is actually perpetuating, ITSELF, the exploitation of this disabled old man, because no doubt, the exploitation of the disabled old man was by the Queensland Government, and a number of parts of the Queensland Government in collusion.

This fraud of the disabled old man was orchestrated by Queensland Public Sector Parasite, Douglas Porter, when he was Registrar of The University of Queensland, for the benefit of The University of Queensland and to punish the disabled old man for standing up for his rights as a Disabled person, while at The University of Queensland.  Involved in the Porter perpetrated fraud was an ARMED ROBBERY by the Queensland Government being the Queensland police in particular corrupt cops Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony, of the disabled old man at his home together with a concurrent fraudulent arrest of the disabled old man by the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala.

The law confirms that the Armed Robbery by Henri EliasRantala and Monica Louise Antony, was actually a CRIMINAL
armed robbery. The factual evidence is also online.  The conduct constituting the armed robbery was not just accidental.   The perpetrators of the fraud, Queensland Public Sector parasites, set out to create what they expected would be an arguable case TO JUSTIFY THE "ARMED ROBBERY" as just part of their normal operations.    They created a RUSE for just that reasonHowever, the silly bitch lawyer Joanne Whiting, did not know what she was doing, so clearly the Ruse was hatched by one of her superiors.

That fact then begs the question of the purpose of that
RUSE and armed robbery, and exposes the perpetrators of the defrauding of the disabled old man of his home.  Because the Queensland Government perpetrated the fraud of the disabled old man of his home, his house and land, the Queensland government wants it concealed.  Therefore, the conduct of prosecuting the disabled old man is criminal and makes the perpetrated an accessory to the fraud.  The evidence giving those prosecuting the disabled old man a "guilty mind" is all that evidence on that webpage.  Those involved now in "prosecuting" the disabled old man  are criminal. 

While the corrupt parasite Shane Hunter, a prosecutor from the Commonwealth DPP, had the knowledge that the corrupt police Rantala and Antony did commit an armed robbery, he cannot be prosecuted as he has "advocates' immunity".  However, none of the others involved in the process of prosecuting the Disabled Old Man have immunity.  Corrupt ex-cop [now 'working' for KPMG] Brendan Scott Read had put another "prosecutor" from the CDPP right into the frame, by admitting they colluded to bring the false charges against the disabled old man, but that prosecutor was not an advocate in this matter, so does not have
advocates' immunity.  That other parasite from the CDPP is named Anthony Gett.  Corrupt ex-cop Brendan Scott Read also does not have immunity from prosecution for being an accessory to the Armed Robbery and to the defrauding the disabled old man of his house and land, worth in the order of $1million.  Of course, we will be assisting the disabled old man to gain many more similar house and land properties in the area from the Fraudsters.  This will include the house of the defrauding lawyer who did the transfer of the title with full knowledge of the fraud.  His name is Stephen Tonge.  The Queensland Government, both the Queensland Public Sector university, The University of Queensland, and the Queensland Government of Anna Bligh proper,  will be up for the majority of the damages.  This all arose because the disabled old man IS disabled.  It was thought by the public sector parasites, with UQ Registrar Douglas Porter, as the lead criminal in the box seat driving the fraud of the disabled old man, that the disabled old man was ripe for exploitation, because he is permanently disabled.  Now, the Commonwealth of Australia, in the person of the corrupt Commonwealth DPP prosecutor Shane R. Hunter, has joined the fray exploiting the disabled old man.  This in in stark contravention of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The parasitic Federal labor government acceded to the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities  on 21st August, 2009.

Because all the police involved in the prosecution of the disabled old man, are presumed to know the detail of the evidence proving the armed robbery because the evidence and legal reason is in the Public Domain, online and it would be reasonable to presume that police would check its validity, and we know the evidence is 100% genuine, then all the police including the police solicitor Paxton Booth are put in the frame by the evidence of Brendan Scott Read.  The other police aware of the criminal conduct in which they were engaged included  Detective Sergeant Steven Bignall, Detective Senior Constables Gavin Hackett and Detective Senior Constable Dave Graham.  Each of these has been engaged in a criminal activity.  This amounts to 

Because parasitic fraudster Shane Hunter of the CDPP was prepared to prosecute these charges, when he knew the evidence proved that police Henri Elias Rantala and Monica Louise Antony committed an Armed Robbery, suggests that he expected a win, meaning that he knew the Magistrates Court, and possibly the District Court are corrupt, like as displayed, maybe by Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and District Court Judge Leanne Clare.  that .d ..


This case now has a high profile International dimension.  Australia has ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD].  Importantly, the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia has, on 21st August, 2009 acceded to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [OP].  As shyster Shane Hunter is a Commonwealth Public Servant within the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, a Commonwealth Agency, a part of the Executive Arm of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, he and it are subject to the OP.  As the disabled old man has already suffered extensive discrimination, and fraud, at the hands of Shyster Shane Hunter, breach of the CRPD has already occurred and hence, pursuant to the OP, formal complaint can be made to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Geneva, Switzerland, once all domestic Australian remedies have been exhausted, or effectively exhausted.

The summary for each day will be a Menu of the anchors [or markers/tags] placed in the Transcript of this day.  It will be effectively a Summary of the discussion between the Magistrate Paul M Kluck [the Klutz] and Commonwealth Prosecutor, shyster Shane Hunter, [who knows the evidence that  proves the corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala did in fact commit an armed robbery because no-one had authority to enter exclusively possessed land, on that occasion; they needed a court order but did not have one].  The disabled old man did not appear in the committal hearing coram Kluck, after 28th June, as he had become ill from the constant barrage of harassment and jibes aimed at his disabilities, and attacks upon his weaknesses caused by his disabilities, from the Magistrate Kluck the Klutz and from the Commonwealth Government lawyer fraudster Shane Hunter.  Of course, neither need worry as Magistrate Klutz has Judicial Immunity and shyster Shane Hunter who knows he is assisting a crime perpetrated by the Government against a disabled citizen, including EXPLOITATION of the DISABLED, to remain concealed, has Advocates' Immunity.  In Kluck's court, Due Process was abrogated, because the disabled old man had Special Needs that were not accommodated by Paul M Kluck. Hence, from that moment, Kluck's court became a nullity. Thus, from then, the disabled old man was denied Due Process.  Read on the transcript, how Magistrate Kluck ridiculed the disabled old man.

At the time of committing the Armed Robbery of the disabled old man, Henri Elias Rantala illegally arrested the disabled old man so as to keep him from his home while his home was ransacked and his yard was cleared of all of his possession to order of the Queensland Government, who wished to take control of his property in quick time, for The University of Queensland to use.  This was orchestrated by the then Registrar of The University of Queensland, Douglas Porter.  Well, on 20th July, 2010, 22 days after the last day that the disabled old man tried to perform in the committal hearing, on 28th June, 2010, the Queensland Court of Appeal gave it decision regarding that illegal arrest on that day of the disabled old man by parasite cop Rantala.  In clear dicta the Court of Appeal raised the spectre of the gross criminality involved in the whole matter

This day's transcript is one continuous file/page.  These anchors when listed will be listed in sequence.
The three days when witnesses have actually given evidence have been similarly summarised with "anchors" [aka markers/tags], and each appears thus:
  1. Day 1: 24th June, 2010
  2. Day 2: 25th June, 2010
  3. Day 3: 28th June, 2010
This case has international consequences, as this action by the Commonwealth Prosecutor, given that the disabled old man has been thrown out of his home by a corrupt judicial system of the magistrates and District Courts, is a disgusting reflection upon the judicial principle of Due Process, for any country in the world. This will make Australia the laughing stock of the international justice community.  So much more so as all this has been done with the full knowledge of the Australian Attorney General, Robert McClelland.

Fraud by Douglas Porter, The University of Queensland, [part of the Australian Government], by defrauding a disabled reclusive old man of his HOUSE & LAND; including Douglas Porter's being linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity

These pages will be developed to expose the defrauding of a disabled, and hence reclusive old man of his house and land at 254 Hawken Drive St Lucia [view MAP] by Douglas Porter, the previous Registrar of The University of Queensland, for use by The University of Queensland.  Douglas Porter had been attacking, bullying and discriminating against this disabled reclusive old man since the early 1990s when he was a mature age student at The University of Queensland.

Porter was closely associated with two others linked to the Attempted MURDER of the disabled old man, being the then recent law lecturers Quentin Bryce, and Patsy Mary Wolfe.  The disabled old man was, at that time, a student of law at the University of Queensland, where Porter was Registrar.  Porter was engaged in bullying 
the disabled old man prior to the Attempted Murder of the disabled old man, and subsequenly, but then with greater  gusto.   Douglas Porter, then, as clandstine Chair of the St Johns College Council, that ran the St Johns College on the St Lucia, Brisbane Campus of The University of Queensland, began to secretly orchestrate the theft of the home of the disabled old man; the house and land owned in trust by the disabled old man, to take advantage of the fact that the disabled old man was under a strident attack..  

LinkToAspinallInPorterPanel.php This Profile Panel re the parasitic Douglas Porter, rewarded by the anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall and the anglican church, because Porter used confidential information obtained as Registrar of The University of Queensland, to assist Phillip Aspinall steal the home of a vulnerable disabled guy links most appropriately to the site exposing the fraud of this vulnerable disabled guy by anglican archbishop Phillip Aspinall.

  Douglas PORTER is linked to the ATTEMPTED MURDER of the disabled old man; with clandestine police complicity.
See fat pig parasite Porter playing with himself

  masturbating

in his office. So, what can you expect from The University of Queensland?
Write and tell us what you think about this University.
  Douglas Porter taken at 9:55AM 12th July, 2006 in his office at The University of Queensland where he was at that time, Registrar of The University of Queensland, and also clandestinely, the Representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly Chairman of, the St Johns College Council which runs St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland.  For years prior and years since then, Porter was secretly scheming to steal my home, beneficially owned by me, from me, by threatening and manipulating the emotionally challenged emotional shell of the trustee.

Concurrently, while I was then a student at the Universiity of Queensland, Douglas Porter, as Registrar, repeatedly discriminated against me in relation to my use of the libraries and my being accompanied by my two wee assistance dogs while on the campus of UQ.

Just days before the armed robbery on me on 29th November, 2004, by corrupt cop [and Armed Robber] at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, as a preliminary and integral step towards stealing my property [my home, my beneficially owned house and land], from me, all orchestrated by Douglas Porter, Douglas Porter had that same corrupt cop Henri Elias Rantala charge me with bogus criminal charges. No doubt this was intended to complicate my life even more than my life was being complicated, on top of my disabilities, by all the Douglas Porter inspired disability discrimination of me in UQ libraries, so making the theft of my home even easier for The University of Queensland.


We will build into this caption here, the detail that is relevant to this intellectual lightweight and corrupt gutless parasite .  Whereever this photo appears on new pages on our websites, this caption will accompany the image of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 .   This caption will be progressively added to all previous representations of the photo of Douglas Porter  with Doctor of Economics honoris causa [gained with his charactersitic effort - as evidenced in the conjoined photo],, the clandestine representative of The University of Queensland on, and importantly, Chairman of, St Johns College COUNCIL, which runs, and importantly, sets the BUDGET for, St Johns College on the St Lucia Campus of The University of Queensland, and Secretary and Registrar for 22years retiring [as Registrar but not as Chair of St Johns College Council], on 31st December, 2008 . 

Douglas Porter was The University of Queensland's SECRETIVE/CLANDESTINE representative, [and Chair], on the Governing body of one college, St Johns College at the University of Queensland - [see 7th paragraph of this linked UQ publication] or our copy.   [Of course, The University of Queensland has complete control of that land on which the college is built, with its complicated legal arrangement.]  The Governing body is called the the St Johns College Council [SJCC] and Douglas Porter is the Chair of the SJCC. Important in the workings of St Johns College and the St Johns College Council, is the SJCC Budget.  The Warden of St Johns College is the fraudster the Rev John Morgan.  He is answerable to the SJCC for the running of SJC.  In particular, he is petrified of his spending being in excess of the SJCC budget.  He even attempts to defraud to avoid spending money that is not in the SJCC budget.  Earlier that year, Morgan admitted lying to me the previous year, so that he would not have to face up to the St Johns College Council [SJCC], for having spent money that he was legally required to spend, that was, however, not in the SJCC budget.  

Hence, SJCC is a part of the Australian Government Sector, as is The University of Queensland.  Also involved in this fraud were other divisions of the Australian Public Sector, namely the Brisbane City Council, Queensland Police [including the most senior level, on the evidence of the Queensland Police], Queensland Courts especially Magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich aka Magistrate Topsy-Turvy and Supreme Court Judge Henry George Fryberg. Others were involved for the money they would make from it and to be "on the in" with corrupt public sector parasites.  These include lawyer Stephen Tonge, [view home of Tonge on MAP]  then a partner of Firm of lawyers Flower & Hart but more recently of Tress Cox.  Some Capital Funding was provided by the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church aka the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Queensland, Paul de Jersey, is the Chancellor of the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church [BDAC].  They provided the funding for an expected return [albeit fraudulent] of approximately 20% year on year plus a locked in Capital Gain well in excess of CPI indexation.

Because the Australian Government has been involved in defrauding this disabled reclusive old man, this matter, and his being defrauded of his Commonwealth Disability Support Pension by Centrelink, will end up coram/before UN committees in Geneva pursuant to Australia's acceding to the UN's Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.   The Corrupt Australian Government and all parts of it involved in this widespread fraud should be greatly shamed and we will expose them.

The Queensland Court of Appeal, the highest court in Queensland, has recently spoken on this matter.  [It was written up in the Brisbane newspaper as "Talk of the Legal World".], However, there is far more to come.

RussellMathewsEmailSignatureDRA

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
International Disability Rights Advocate
invoking
UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
& UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
See my RESOUNDING VICTORY 20th July, 2010 in
Qld Court of Appeal

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of
      The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND
Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email me.]

includedMenuDistrictCourtKerryOBrien.php

Menu: Qld District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

G'day, This menu will collect the various mentions on our websites of our process of exposing the fraud and corruption in the Public Sector of Queensland and the Commonwealth of Australia.  So much of this corruption is in the court, but we believe we have found a 'headland' of Truth and Honesty in the Queensland Courts.  Regardless, we can take these legal matters to higher courts including UN Committees in Geneva Switzerland.  We believe we have been able to make these inroads into the corruption in Queensland and Austalia because of our websites.
  1. Submission to District Court re DCJ Griffin Recuse SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon 19th November, 2012:
  2. Submission to District Court re SCQ Application HUMAN RIGHTS Injunction Nicola Roxon & My Flu; 12th November, 2012:
  3. 2nd November, 2012 Unrepresented Disabled Defendant Teaches Human Rights Law To District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien:
  4. Submission To District Court DCJA Kerry O'Brien 19th October, 2012 Re Disability Arrangements Unlawful Order Is Disability Discrimination:
  5. 4th Oct 2012 Transcript DCJ Michael Shanahan Prejudges Appeal Without Jurisdiction Or Evidence Eager Misrepresent My Application To Recuse:
  6. Submission to & Appearance in District Court 4th October, 2012 Motion DCJ Michael Shanahan Disqualify Himself As catholic Due Repeated catholic Fraud, Corruption, Attempted Murder; Patsy Wolfe, Quentin Bryce, Jeff Spender; Apprehended Bias a la Ustashi, IRA, nazi:
  7. See the Outcome of my Submission [above] to mention 4th October, 2012:
  8. Magistrate Marshall Davies, Eager To Convict Innocent Disabled Man Targeted By Corrupt Police To Please Corrupt Police:
  9. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 24th August, 2012, DCJA Kerry John O'Brien Rejects Immunity from Prosecution Due Qualified Privilege Confirms SetUp by Government including Courts:
  10. CDPP Email Advice & District Court Transcript: re My Motions, 31st July, 2012, Russell Mathews: DCJA Kerry O'Brien's back, admits ignorance, seems determined to not ensure Fair Hearing; Due Process. :
  11. Submission & Appearance to District Court 24th August, 2012 Motion Permanent Stay Qualified Privilege Social Moral Duty Expose Australian Corruption in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  12. Why Chief District Court Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe Should Disqualify From Dealing with RussellMathews,in Any Matter:
  13. Why District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien Should Disqualify From Dealing with Russell Mathews in Any Matter:
  14. Submission & Appearance to District Court "Interim Review" 31st July, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by Douglas Porter of University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church; Re DUTY of Court to Determine & Provide Accommodation of my Special Needs for Due Process & Disqualification of Judges for BIAS & WORSE:
  15. Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick Has Less Risk of Violent Attack As REAL Julie Maree Dick Is BAIT:
  16. Perjury, Fraud & Corruption Connection to "Her Honour" Judge Julie Maree Mellifont nee Dick aka Judge Julie Marie Dick:
  17. DCJ Leanne Clare nee HURLEY: Murder Pig Snr Sgt Chris HURLEY Palm Island killer Mulrunji Doomadgee, Why as DPP would she not charge her NAMESAKE?:
  18. District Court Transcript: Mention, 15th June, 2012, Russell Mathews: DUMB Chief Judge Patsy Mary Wolfe's prior professional misconduct returning to haunt her. :
  19. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:
  20. Submission to District Court Mention 15th June, 2012 in Continued Attack upon Disabled Old Man by Queensland & Australian Government to conceal his EXPLOITATION by University of Qld & Chief Justice Paul deJersey's Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church:
  21. Hearing 16th May, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  22. Hearing 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  23. Decision 21st July, 2011 Mathews-v-TheCommissioner of Police [2011] QDC_Brisbane #3095_2010 coram KJ O'Brien DCJA::
  24. The August, 2011 [20110814] Update: on Court Case Alleging Russell Mathews' Use of a Carriage Service [Broadband] to harass but actually Exposing Even More police & political Corruption in Australia:
  25. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law does CRIMINAL FAVOUR for OTHER ISRCL 'members'
  26. Anthony Gett of International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law {ISRCL} uses ISRCL EVIL contact to TARGET DISABLED PERSON
  27. Listing of Members & Directors of the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law
  28. International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Director's CRIME to DEFRAUD DISABLED PERSON
  29. What is the future for the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law After CRIME Exposure?
  30. Who are the International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law?
  31. Anthony Gett sycophant to International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Evil judges:
  32. Index: District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien [We may move this file later, out of the Emails Menu: Now we have.]
  33. Submission #0001:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  34. Submission #0002:  Purported  referral to the District Court  per Sec 20B Crimes Act 1914 by Magistrate Paul M Kluck on 24th September, 2010
  35. Initial General Submission to District Court coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien AO for mention 28th January, 2011
  36. Submission #0003 in Registrar's Reference; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 10AM 4th March, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another:
  37. Submission #0004 in Sec222, Justices Act 1886; District Court Appeal, # D3095/10: 9:30AM 16th May, 2011: Mathews _v_ Read & another/Commissioner of Police:
  38. State Crime Operations Command Pigs Steven Geoffrey Bignell & Brendan Scott Read [Now of KPMG] Con the Dicks To Help Police Crime
  39. Queensland Police Keep Clever Dick John Edward Dick & the REAL Julie Maree Dick On Ice To Further Police Fraud
  40. Medical Report of 20100806 ex Dr Rob Moyle re Special Needs Accommodated by Keyboard and Computer = Disability AIDS
  41. Dr Bennett's report 31st March, 1998, listing FOUR separate episodes of head injuries sustained by me

Menu: of Emails: Registry, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court emails of 20101104 re District Court coram Kerry O'Brien: Jo Stonebridge Emails Ending with Smart Arse Email Ex Smart Arse Deputy Regisrar Kerri
  2. More 20101104_District Court coram Kerry O'Brien Emails Ex District Court Jo Stonebridge & Deputy Registrar Kerri
  3. Jo StoneBridge, Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court Bogus Email Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  4. Smart Arse Email From Smart Arse Deputy Registrar Kerri
  5. Email 20101122 Jo Stonebridge District Court Sheriff & Marshal
  6. Commonwealth DPP_Handed Up Copy Of My Submission For Attention Judge Kerry John Obrien
  7. Jo Stonebridge Advises That I_Am Required To Attend Next Mention
  8. Jo StoneBridge Sherrif & Marshal Qld District Court gives Bogus Advice to Purchase Transcripts
  9. District Court Registry Parasites Impede Disabled Old Man's Communication With the Court
  10. Qld Public Sector Parasite Jo Stonebridge Deems My Commuication With Court 'Not Appropriate'
  11. Jo Stonebridge Now Advises There Is No Charge for Transcripts in Criminal Matters
  12. My Direct Reproach to Jo Stonebridge for Impeding My Communication with the Court
  13. 20101206 Ken Wells Executive Officer to the Director of Courts [WOW - Big Deal] Bogus information Pittance
  14. My Advice to District Court That I_will Publish on the Web due to Her Stuffing Me Around
  15. My Advice to District Court That District Court Lacks Jurisdiction
  16. My Advice to District Court That I_Will Communicate As A_Courtesy
  17. District Court Ken Wells Response To My Reproach of Jo Stonebridge Re Courteous
MenuTranscriptsDistrictCourtKeyyOBrien

Menu: Transcripts, District Court coram DCJ Kerry John OBrien

  1. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 22nd November, 2010, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  2. District Court Transcript:  Mention, 28th January, 2011, Russell Mathews coram DCJ Kerry John O'Brien:
  3. District Court Transcript: Mention, 20th April, 2012, Russell Mathews coram Judge Milton Griffin SC DCJ Asks CDPP's Shane Hunter If Referral Order Proper & Question Properly Raised:


The 'Queen' Janine Schmidt, University of Queensland LAND FRAUD MENU:
Menu: NaziBully 'Queen' Janine SCHMIDT on our HaigReport 'Retribution' Website:
  1. NaziBully 'Queen' Janine SCHMIDT on our HaigReport RETRIBUTION Website
  2. Mrs Linda Bird, another University of Queensland Post-Menopausal FAT FRAUDSTER, Public Sector Parasite
  3. 'Queen' Janine's mental minion Catherine Ann Geraghty finds lying, cheating and bullying the disabled, EXCITING
  4. Ann Tilbury is GUILTY of Criminal Assault on an Officer of the Court who was Serving her with a Summons:
  5. See the TILBURY connection to the Rhodes Scholarship BLOOD MONEY Scandal
  6. See UQ Criminal Richard Zebrovius Admission of Dangerous Driving for Douglas Porter fraud
Menu for Our New Dedicated 'Queen' Janine Schmidt Website
  1. Home Page for Our New Dedicated 'Queen' Janine Schmidt Website
  2. 'Queen' Janine Schmidt Email of 20090909 Resign, Sack or Leave Decision as Trenholme Director of Libraries, McGill Uni, Montreal, Canada.
  3. Consequences for 'Queen' Janine Schmidt, of her NAZI BULLYING  of me, and the INTERNET.
  4. Page for Links to other mentions, BY OTHER PUBLISHERS, of the 'Queen' Janine Schmidt, NAZI BULLY, on the Internet.
Menu for Our Earlier Mentions and Evidence of actions of NAZI BULLY 'Queen' Janine Schmidt at The University of Queensland: [& this Menu will go in each of these]
  1. A little early history of this Nazi Bully 'Queen' Janine Schmidt
  2. The EARLY Documented Advice [by FOI] from Registrar that I am disabled and Legally entitled to be accompanied by my Assistance dogs:
  3. Blog [now closed] entries from a number of Sources of this 'Queen' Janine's NAZI BULLY ACTIONS.
  4. An UPDATE on the early history of this Nazi Bully 'Queen' Janine Schmidt
  5. 'Queen' Janine Schmidt Had her Minion report my Assistance Dogs, so, to have them abducted from outside the Library, after 'Queen' Janine had prevented their accompanying me in the library.
  6. The Registrar's Secretary, "TilBULLY" was happy to disobey her boss to please 'Queen' Janine, & RECORDED IT.
  7. The email to Schmidt from her boss, the Registrar of The University of Queensland. re the LAW showing 'Queen' Janine Schmidt's continued intransigence, even after two years.
  8. Online Version: [3Mb]  PRINT JOURNAL: The University of Queensland Alumni Journal ISSN: 1834-660X 23 April, 2007. Issue #: 200701
includedMenuAvengerRevengeRetribution.php.html

Menu: Retribution for FRAUD & BULLYING by Douglas Porter & The University of Qld, of DISABLED old man.

[A Cascading Drop Down Menu [CDDM] will soon be in this spot.]
  1. Douglas Porter [& University of Qld] FRAUD on Disabled Old Man to BULLY him
  2. How Nazi BULLY of Disabled old man, ex librarian Janine Schmidt "repaid".
  3. Read how BCC bully Councillor Judy Magub "repaid" for assisting to defraud disabled old man.
  4. The University of Queensland is fully liable for the Fraud of ex Registrar Douglas Porter.
  5. The Clandestine method used by Douglas Porter to defraud the disabled old man.
  6. Means that Anglican Church Fraudster Priest Rev Canon Prof Dr John Leslie Morgan used to defraud the disabled old man.
  7. Rev John Morgan's Fraud he called Australian Institute of Ethics and the Professions
  8. The way that the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church assisted the Fraud of the disabled old man or BIG PROFITS!
  9. Douglas Porter is the Chairman of the UQ council called St Johns College Council that Runs St Johns College.
  10. The real lowdown on St Johns College at The University of Queensland, and is part of the Australian Public Sector [Government].
  11. How Lawyer Stephen Tonge, a UQ hanger on, profited by assisting the fraud of the disable old man.
  12. Korske Ara Amrita   ISSN: 1834-6340   [What is Korske Ara Amrita?] 
  13. Louise Kitchen Amrita   ISSN:  1834-643X   [What is Louise Kitchen Amrita?]
  14. The Magistrate whose conduct in Court was described buy the Qld Court of Appeal as Topsy-Turvy "Sentence First - Verdict afterwards".
  15. How Magistrate PaulM Kluck Denies a Fair Hearing & DueProcess by denying Accommodation of the Disabled old man's Special Needs
  16. No Jurisdiction: Lies, Fraud, Hot Potato-Get Rid of It
  17. Shane Hunter, the CDPP lawyer uses an abuse of court process to bully a disabled old man.
  18. The way that Tony Roser, Registrar of Courts, at the Brisbane Magistrates Court thinks he can bully the disabled old man.
  19. How Magistrates Courts' incompetent Tape recorder operator, Nikki Parisi, has tickets on herself and stuffs up.
  20. The Multiple ways Police/cop Armed Robber Henri Elias Rantala assisted the defrauding of the Disabled Old Man.
  21. The  ways Police/cop Armed Robber Monica Antony assisted the defrauding of the Disabled Old Man.
  22. The WIDESPREAD fraud & corruption, across Australia, of the rspca taking advantage of the public sector corruption across Australia.
  23. The FRAUD & CORRUPTION of Maree Fell and co of the Society of St Vincent de Paul, in Cairns as they lied and cheated to close down Vinnies' Gym and steal all Gym equipment belonging to Jim Tierney.
  24. Expose of ex Dean of Law at UQ, Geoffrey deQ Walker as he set out to cheat disabled old man to please his corrupt colleagues.
  25. Expose of how UQ Deputy Vice-Chancellor Ted Brown Conspired with Douglas Porter, and ex Dean of Law at UQ, Geoffrey deQ Walker to cheat disabled Old man.
  26. The fraud, perjury, lies and cheating of the Disabled Old Man by ex Coles Manager Linda Maree Wease.
  27. The many levels of corruption in the Queensland Police:
  28. Police/copper Brendan Read defrauds disabled old man & Signs Oath of facts of which he has no knowledge.
  29. Accountants KPMG wanted ex cop Brendan Read who deposed to false oath, to defraud clients of KPMG.
  30. Brisbane City Council concoct RUSE  to try to justify Armed Robbery For University of Queensland & Brisbane Diocese Anglican Church.
  31. Campbell Newman happy to conceal the fraud and Armed Robbery of disabled old many by BCC.
  32. Australia's Governor-General's connection to, and knowledge of, FRAUD in the Courts in Qld
  33. When a barrister, Chief Judge of the Qld District Court Patsy Mary Wolfe Abrogated her Paramount Duty To the Court and so Defrauds Disabled old man.
  34. For Years Qld's Translink cheat the Disabled Old Man by banning his Assistance dogs.
  35. Peter Strachan, Translink CEO is the Incompetent Public Sector Parasite Discriminates against the Disabled & reclusive Old Man.
  36. Are Margaret White, Patsy Mary Wolfe & Quentin Bryce previously of UQ_Law Faculty a Corrupt Tyranny Trio due  Fraud & Fraud On Courts?
  37. BEWARE of UQ Sports Ltd as Chairman, Douglas Porter is a Criminal & Fraudster. He is not a fit & proper person to be a company director.
  38. You decide.  Is Susan Barker of the Queensland Office of Information Commissioner, Incompetent or a Fraud?
  39. Valuable Information about the Queensland Office of the Information Commissioner.
  40. Is John Briton,  the Legal Services Commissioner for Queensland, Incompetent or a Fraud?  He stated in writing, the contrary of a basic legal principle.
  41. Valuable Information about the Queensland Legal Services Commission.
  42. Valuable Information about the Queensland Crime & Misconduct Commission.
linksforumworldrecession
Links to our FORUMS regarding the 21st Century World Recession, SURVIVING IT & PROSPERING.
  1. 21st Century World Recession
  2. Analysis of the 21st Century World Recession
  3. FULL detail of the Analysis of 21st Century World Recession
  4. How to SURVIVE the 21st Century World Recession, & PROSPER
  5. In detail: How to SURVIVE the 21st Century World Recession, & PROSPER.
  6. Looking for Work: Looking for a Job:
  7. How to FIND A JOB, & MAKE MONEY doing it!!
  8. FULL detail: How to FIND A JOB, & MAKE MONEY doing it!!
  9. FULL detail: How to FIND A JOB, & MAKE MONEY FINDING it, and REAL MONEY doing it!!
  10. FULL DETAIL: Looking for Work: Looking for a Job:
  11. Small Business Advisory FORUM
  12. Full Description, Small Business Advisory Forum.
I have addressed this way forward, depending upon one's predilection, based on one's past actions or inclinations: Income from working for an 'employer' or working in one's own business.

  1. Looking for Work: Looking for a Job: How to FIND A JOB, & MAKE MONEY doing it!!
  2. Small Business Advisory FORUM
HaigReport Themes

Themes of  Websites
for the
HAIG   REPORT: Group of Websites:
[We expect, in time, to have all of the thousands of pages on the
HAIG   REPORT: group of websites accessible from this Menu of THEMES. Eventually, there will be 20 themes, each with an average of 15 to 20 websites/domains/directories, with each website/domain having an average of 20 pages. This would equate to 20 x (15 to 20) x 20 = 6,000 to 8,000 pages. This menu of Themes will be included near the bottom of each page, in time. With one line of code, strategically placed, this Menu of Themes is now on thousands of pages. We are continually and progressively adding pages to this Menu of Themes of website Menus.]

commonheader.php

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.  
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      EMAIL us anytime:  Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay. 

Menu: HaigReport'sThemes or Categories of the the Topics of the HaigReport Group of Websites: 
© COPYRIGHT: Russell Gordon Haig Mathews 2002 - 2018

The LATEST ADDITIONS are added to the top:


See  All 67 Domain Names in the HaigReport Group 

© COPYRIGHT: Russell Gordon Haig Mathews 2002 - 2018

Now here are the THEMES:



  1. Commonwealth of Australia Knowingly Employs LIARS, CHEATS and CRIMINALS:


  2. Government Corruption Infecting Corporates; ASX:


  3. New ADDITIONAL platform; Printed Distributed HaigReport NEWSPAPER:


  4. Self Help Law: Do your own Legals/Law:


  5. International: Corrupt Politics & Corrupt religion:


  6. About HaigReport Group of Websites including
    Vote One Russell Mathews:


  7. Russell Mathews [BCom BSc LLB & BA] Commentary additional to the rest of these Websites:


  8. Legal Rights, & BLACKLISTS of parasite residents & tenants in rental accommodation:


  9. RAMPANT POLICE CORRUPTION Exposed by HaigReport Websites; Publicize Your Complaint Here:


  10. Other public sector corruption Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  11. RELIGION Corruption CRIME & PAEDOPHILIA Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  12. Qld Govt Translink wankers & pony spankers Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  13. Corrupt JUDGES, COURTS, & TRIBUNALS Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  14. Corrupt LAWYERS Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  15. Corrupt POLITICANS Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  16. University of Qld Fraud & Corruption Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  17. Corruption at other universities; Exposed by HaigReport Websites:


  18. Expose' of Other CORRUPTION, including TELSTRA, under influence of public sector parasites, as exposed by the HaigReport Group of Websites:


  19. Business Promoted by HaigReport Websites:


  20. Finance by HaigReport Websites:

This page is part of the Internet presence of

Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
View list of SOME of my WEBSITES and Bulletin Boards

Email: http://HaigReport.com/eml.html


SEE WHAT I PLAN TO DO ABOUT IT!


Image
CLICK on image => My Election HOMEPAGE