The HAIG
REPORT: the EVIDENCE
The labor 'EDGE' is ELECTORAL FRAUD:
The
HEINER AFFAIR confirms
corrupt labor.
The labor ELECTORAL FRAUD involves
labor's many "REGISTERS" of PHANTOM
VOTERS. These "Registers" are
neither formal nor official, but are real never the less. The
organisor of one is Terry Mellifont, struck off so ex-lawyer and the criminal
husband of DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Julie Maree DICK. [Link]
Once labor
was in power, Wayne
Goss set about
institutionalizing its corruption, with the establishment
of the CJC. Labor has done this in many other ways
too, including, most seriously, by appointing corrupt individuals and
"suspect
individuals" to the Judiciary.
Piers Akerman
Saturday, April 26, 2008 at 03:04pm
AN unprecedented legal challenge may prevent the appointment of Australia’s first nominated female Governor-General, Queensland Governor Quentin Bryce.
Documents lodged with the Queensland Parliamentary Crime and Misconduct Committee on February 14, two months before Ms Bryce was nominated as Australia’s next Governor-General by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, have created a Constitutional nightmare for the Queensland Government and the Prime Minister.
The papers are contained in the nine-volume Rofe Audit, by leading Sydney barrister David Rofe, QC, into the long-running and unresolved Heiner Affair involving approval by the Goss Cabinet in 1990 of the illegal shredding of documents relating to investigations into allegations of child abuse at a Brisbane detention centre.
Ominously for Ms Bryce, the PCMC has already conducted what it terms a “preliminary examination’’ and has sought further advice on aspects of the material which contains a list of 68 alleged prima facie criminal charges and specific evidence and arguments in support of those allegations.
In response to that request, lawyers representing Mr Kevin Lindeberg, a former public servant who sought the involvement of the PCMC, last week told the committee that “recent events’’ had made the need for action “more urgent’’.
They reminded the committee that since their complaint was lodged in February, Mr Rudd had announced his appointment of Ms Bryce as Governor-General designate to take up her duty on or about September 5, 2008.
“The PCMC would be well aware that Mr Rudd is named in (alleged) prima facie criminal charges 1 and 2 of Volume 1, and the Hon. Quentin Bryce AC in the (alleged) prima facie criminal charge 67 of Volume IX of the Audit respectively,’’ the lawyers wrote.
The letter also notes a recent
judicial appointment in Queensland and says
that with that appointment, the PCMC now held evidence alleging prima facie
criminality in respect of six serving Queensland
judicial officers, Justice
Catherine Holmes, Justice Tim Carmody,
Judge Julie
Dick, Her Honour Leanne
Clare, His Honour Noel Nunan and State Magistrate
Michael Barnes.
Ms Bryce sought a report on the Heiner Affair from then Premier Peter Beattie on October 23, 2003.
Premier Beattie presented the report to her in April, 2005, almost two years later, but did not make the document public, in stark contrast to the manner in which he handled the Anglican Church’s report into abuse which he tabled in the Queensland Parliament before the resignation of former Governor General Peter Hollingworth in May, 2003, as a matter of “public interest’’.
Rev Hollingworth, a former Archbishop of Brisbane was the subject of a relentless campaign during which he faced allegations that he had participated in a church cover-up and failed to act against church officers engaged in sexual abuse.
A fortnight before Mr Hollingworth’s resignation, then Labor Opposition Shadow spokesperson for Children and Youth and the Status of Women, Ms Nicola Roxon, told Federal Parliament on May 13 that: “… We cannot afford to brush it aside, keep it behind closed doors or say it is someone else’s issue. We need to be prepared to take a leadership role here. It might be awkward for the government. We need to take some action so this terrible issue is dealt with. The community thinks that leaders in this country are covering up what has happened in the past. Whether they think it is church leaders, politicians or other powerful people, we must make sure that we are never part of that conspiracy. We on this side of the House and, I am sure, the people on the other side of the House do not want to cover up this issue ...’’
The following day, Victorian Labor Senator Stephen Conroy continued the attack, telling the Senate that: “Victims, parents and the community do not want any more cover-ups. They want their stories told, they want perpetrators brought to justice and they want further generations of children to be protected from such suffering.’’
He was followed by South Australian Labor Senator Nick Bolkus, who said “In our performance, in our response, we also will be judged on whether and how we respond to this important challenge. If we as a national parliament do not take the right and proper moral stand on issues relating to paedophilia that affect our children, then we too could be condemned - and I think quite fairly so - by the public of Australia for turning a blind eye to paedophilia, its victims and those who tolerate it.’’
On May 26, three days before the Mr Hollingworth resigned, the then Opposition leader, Simon Crean, told the House “you cannot have people in authority who have covered up for child sex abuse. It is as simple as that’’, and “Isn’t a person of authority who failed to act on issues of child sexual abuse guilty of moral turpitude? Of course he is. This is a person in authority. This was a person to whom the allegations were made, and he failed to act.’’
The key to the allegations made against Ms Bryce and several other senior Queensland politicians and judicial officers echoes the point made by Mr Crean: they were made aware of allegations and failed to act.
Under the Queensland Crime and Misconduct Act 2001 and the repealed Criminal Justice Act, government authorities must act if they receive allegations of “suspected’’ official misconduct. Failure to do so falls into the category of “abuse of office in commission’’.
The Rofe Audit makes it clear there is evidence that goes well beyond this low threshold.
The PCMC review follows the release last August of the so-called Judges’ letter which stated that “any action by Executive Government which may have breached the law ought not be immune from criminal prosecution where and when the evidence satisfies the relevant provision’’.
It would seem that the best possible course for Mr Rudd and Ms Bryce is to insist on all matters being investigated and resolved before the Governor General designate takes up her new post.
Until then she should decline to be sworn in to prevent a significant taint being attached to the highest public office in the land. For that matter, Ms Bryce should stand aside in Queensland until a proper investigation clears removes forever this taint from the Queensland government and the office of Governor in that State.
See also
The
Heiner Affair
- a
matter of concern
Balson's
letter
to
Quentin Bryce (May 2005)
See Scott Balson's account of the shredding scandal
Taint sticks to Bryce
Piers Akerman
Saturday, April 26, 2008 at 03:04pm
AN unprecedented legal challenge may prevent the appointment of Australia’s first nominated female Governor-General, Queensland Governor Quentin Bryce.
Documents lodged with the Queensland Parliamentary Crime and Misconduct Committee on February 14, two months before Ms Bryce was nominated as Australia’s next Governor-General by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, have created a Constitutional nightmare for the Queensland Government and the Prime Minister.
The papers are contained in the nine-volume Rofe Audit, by leading Sydney barrister David Rofe, QC, into the long-running and unresolved Heiner Affair involving approval by the Goss Cabinet in 1990 of the illegal shredding of documents relating to investigations into allegations of child abuse at a Brisbane detention centre.
Ominously for Ms Bryce, the PCMC has already conducted what it terms a “preliminary examination’’ and has sought further advice on aspects of the material which contains a list of 68 alleged prima facie criminal charges and specific evidence and arguments in support of those allegations.
In response to that request, lawyers representing Mr Kevin Lindeberg, a former public servant who sought the involvement of the PCMC, last week told the committee that “recent events’’ had made the need for action “more urgent’’.
They reminded the committee that since their complaint was lodged in February, Mr Rudd had announced his appointment of Ms Bryce as Governor-General designate to take up her duty on or about September 5, 2008.
“The PCMC would be well aware that Mr Rudd is named in (alleged) prima facie criminal charges 1 and 2 of Volume 1, and the Hon. Quentin Bryce AC in the (alleged) prima facie criminal charge 67 of Volume IX of the Audit respectively,’’ the lawyers wrote.
The letter also notes a recent judicial appointment in Queensland and says that with that appointment, the PCMC now held evidence alleging prima facie criminality in respect of six serving Queensland judicial officers, Justice Catherine Holmes, Justice Tim Carmody, Judge Julie Dick, Her Honour Leanne Clare, His Honour Noel Nunan and State Magistrate Michael Barnes.
Ms Bryce sought a report on the Heiner Affair from then Premier Peter Beattie on October 23, 2003.
Premier Beattie presented the report to her in April, 2005, almost two years later, but did not make the document public, in stark contrast to the manner in which he handled the Anglican Church’s report into abuse which he tabled in the Queensland Parliament before the resignation of former Governor General Peter Hollingworth in May, 2003, as a matter of “public interest’’.
Rev Hollingworth, a former Archbishop of Brisbane was the subject of a relentless campaign during which he faced allegations that he had participated in a church cover-up and failed to act against church officers engaged in sexual abuse.
A fortnight before Mr Hollingworth’s resignation, then Labor Opposition Shadow spokesperson for Children and Youth and the Status of Women, Ms Nicola Roxon, told Federal Parliament on May 13 that: “… We cannot afford to brush it aside, keep it behind closed doors or say it is someone else’s issue. We need to be prepared to take a leadership role here. It might be awkward for the government. We need to take some action so this terrible issue is dealt with. The community thinks that leaders in this country are covering up what has happened in the past. Whether they think it is church leaders, politicians or other powerful people, we must make sure that we are never part of that conspiracy. We on this side of the House and, I am sure, the people on the other side of the House do not want to cover up this issue ...’’
The following day, Victorian Labor Senator Stephen Conroy continued the attack, telling the Senate that: “Victims, parents and the community do not want any more cover-ups. They want their stories told, they want perpetrators brought to justice and they want further generations of children to be protected from such suffering.’’
He was followed by South Australian Labor Senator Nick Bolkus, who said “In our performance, in our response, we also will be judged on whether and how we respond to this important challenge. If we as a national parliament do not take the right and proper moral stand on issues relating to paedophilia that affect our children, then we too could be condemned - and I think quite fairly so - by the public of Australia for turning a blind eye to paedophilia, its victims and those who tolerate it.’’
On May 26, three days before the Mr Hollingworth resigned, the then Opposition leader, Simon Crean, told the House “you cannot have people in authority who have covered up for child sex abuse. It is as simple as that’’, and “Isn’t a person of authority who failed to act on issues of child sexual abuse guilty of moral turpitude? Of course he is. This is a person in authority. This was a person to whom the allegations were made, and he failed to act.’’
The key to the allegations made against Ms Bryce and several other senior Queensland politicians and judicial officers echoes the point made by Mr Crean: they were made aware of allegations and failed to act.
Under the Queensland Crime and Misconduct Act 2001 and the repealed Criminal Justice Act, government authorities must act if they receive allegations of “suspected’’ official misconduct. Failure to do so falls into the category of “abuse of office in commission’’.
The Rofe Audit makes it clear there is evidence that goes well beyond this low threshold.
The PCMC review follows the release last August of the so-called Judges’ letter which stated that “any action by Executive Government which may have breached the law ought not be immune from criminal prosecution where and when the evidence satisfies the relevant provision’’.
It would seem that the best possible course for Mr Rudd and Ms Bryce is to insist on all matters being investigated and resolved before the Governor General designate takes up her new post.
Until then she should decline to be sworn in to prevent a significant taint being attached to the highest public office in the land. For that matter, Ms Bryce should stand aside in Queensland until a proper investigation clears removes forever this taint from the Queensland government and the office of Governor in that State.
See also
The
Heiner Affair -
a
matter of concern
Balson's
letter
to Quentin Bryce (May 2005)
Return to the shredding scandal
The FUNDAMENTAL
cause of
FRAUD and
CORRUPTION in Western Democracies; [such as Australia
and
the US]: is:
*
A
GROSSLY
DEFECTIVE
ELECTORAL SYSTEM;
*
labor
ABUSES
the
defects;
*
the
labor
government
is thus a fraud;
*
THUS,
all
its
decisions
are defective/corrupt;
* THUS, all its
decisions are defective/corrupt;
Brisbane City Council [BCC] CORRUPTION:
Breaking, Entering and Stealing.
plus ILLEGAL IMPRISONMENT; CRUELTY TO
ANIMALS
Brisbane City Council Corruption,
breaking, entering and stealing, illegal imprisonment, CRUELTY to
ANIMALS.
BEWARE LABOR LAWYERS [Lavarch], they will STEAL YOUR RIGHTS and FREEDOMS.
This is far more serious
than Beattie’s Dr DEATH, HEALTH and WATER
debacles.
Beattie's Lavarch & coy
devised
the health regulation 200(1)
[a regulation, so it did not
have to go before parliament] to seem to give the public
sector parasites the “right” to have you
arrested so they can trespass in your yard AND HOME BUILDING AND STEAL
YOUR
PROPERTY. WHAT WOULD YOU DO IF THAT
WAS
DONE TO YOU? Imagine yourself in
that
situation as IT CAN HAPPEN TO YOU.
YOUR
HOME IS NO LONGER YOUR
CASTLE, thanks to LAVARCH
and Labor. Don’t just
take my word for it. In Queensland, labor is CORRUPT. See
the “advice” of the Labor hack commissions, at the CMC,
the Legal
Services
Commission
and the Information
Commissioner
[see
last sentence 4.25], that the
Yes, without court orders the council, or any government bureaucrat who
has it
in for you, can come and take 30tons of topsoil from your yard and
charge you
for doing it. [Legally they do need court orders, but, in the corrupt
labor
state, the Courts and police do not care.]
The Police will support them with false arrest and false
imprisonment.
All that is needed is a good story.
Forget about the truth. It is
irrelevant that it was breaking the law; both administrative Law and
CRIMINAL
LAW. That it is against the law is no problem. That is what
happened to
me. I had been working at improving the top soil in my yard
for
four years. It was of the quality of high grade potting mix,
being mainly
organic compost. I had been mulching my yard diligently for
four
years. The Brisbane City Council [BCC] decided that they would
pick on me
[check the webpage about why I am picked on, especially by gutless
parasitic
lowlife scum like public servants, when I have the time to publish it]. It was illegal discrimination.
They even had a
bob-cat in to scoop the top
100mm of my soil, plus an excavator, no less, to steal the tons of
valuable
compost, behind a
retaining wall [which they found they had to destroy - Hughie's
desire??]. I had that compost to
improve my yard and to save water. The BCC also stole all my water
saving material I had to INSTALL WATER SAVING PROCEDURES. [THIS
IS THE
BCC's PERVERSE REASON THAT THEY STOLE MY MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT,
AND POSSESSIONS; TO PREVENT ME FROM DOING GOOD THINGS, in the then
looming, now present, wateer crisis.] I had all that in my
landscaping as
I was preparing to make my yard a very productive, and EXTREMELY WATER
EFFICIENT vegetable and fruit garden to grow my own food as I am
disabled and so very poor. They had
a variety
of
trucks come to load up different lots of my property I had in my yard.
They
neatly stacked it in the tray of the small trucks. They had stolen and
then sold
or gave my property to their mates. I
did not have my property just lying on the ground but rather stacked up
on
blocks at least 30 cm above the ground as required.
When the home owner fights back through the
courts the Supreme Court
will
dismiss the application and declare that home owner a vexatious
litigant. On both occasions I produced BCC
documents by
way of affidavit showing conclusively that BCC and their parasites
trespassed,
stole my property AND HAD THE QUEENSLAND POLICE ASSIST THEM. [I’ll tell you about the parasite of a
cop below. He
perjured
himself
in
his affidavit. Other police have
since
denigrated him to me. Rantala is his name and here’s his photo.]
They
are not all corrupt, but enough are and those who are not are merely
complicit. Magistrates refused to allow
the Police to convict the home owner after five separate charges were
laid.
Five false charges - yet the Minister for Police says the Police did
nothing
wrong, This is because he is working for the bureaucracy and not the
voters.
I am FULLY TRAINED as
a
LAWYER
so I will explain the law briefly.
See the Section
160
of
the
Health Act 1937 attached. See
Sub-Section 2 of Section 160. It clearly states that I must be
given a right to be
heard, before
they gain the necessary court order. I
was not given a hearing nor did they have a court order. Sub section (2) ensures Natural
Justice [aka Due Process and aka Procedural Fairness] to me in that I
should
have been given notice of a hearing where it was proposed to cause
detriment to
me. The Right to be heard is a
Common
Law right, and does not need to be legislated, but it has been.
What Lavarch and her corrupt cohorts did to try
to allow her public sector parasitic labor mates invade peoples homes
without
court orders [the BCC knew
that they
needed a
court
order – see their
letter to me and told me in that
letter they would apply to the Magistrates Court, THEY KNEW THEY
WERE CRIMINAL], THEY ARE CERTAIN TO CONTINUE.
,
SO VOTE THEM OUT.
Anyone
will
be
better than a corrupt government
that has corrupted our whole legal system.