Australian
CORRUPTION
EXPOSED
OPEN
LETTER [20061215] to Rev. Canon Prof. Dr John Morgan [Morgan], Warden,
St Johns College [SJC], The University of Queensland re my
request for my
personal information held by you.
Rev. Canon Prof. Dr John Morgan [Morgan],
Warden, St Johns College [SJC],
The University of Queensland [UQ].
SEE THE MORGAN SCANDALS
[the fence fraud]
MORGAN
bullies DISABLED
neighbour to STEAL his HOME.
Rev Canon Prof Dr
John Morgan, Warden of St Johns College of The University of Queensland,
is a BULLY & a
LIAR.
Dear Sir,
I am sending you TODAY [20061215], an ALERT EMAIL alerting you to the
existence of this OPEN LETTER.
Approximately one year ago I requested from you access to ALL personal
information about myself, where that information was held by
you/SJC. My application mentioned FOI. Regardless of
whether SJC is subject to FOI, that was a request for personal
information
about myself where that info is held by SJC. I am entitled to
make that request [and importantly, you are LEGALLY BOUND per National
Privacy Principle #6 in Schedule 3 of the
Privacy Act 1988 [as below] TO SUPPLY IT, if I request access to
it. That I have done]. Mention of FOI does not invalidate
that request for
information. That was a general application for access to all of my
personal information helf by you/SJC. For your guidance
purposes, I suggest that the principles
involved in FOI access could reasonably be employed here. If you
are ignorant of the law [such would not surprise me], that will be and
is, no excuse for your abrogation of the law. You are bound
by the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) to provide that information if
application for access is made by me to you for it. YOU HAVE
ACKNOWLEDGED RECEIPT OF MY APPLICATION.
Since you have had my application for
nigh on one year, I
will attend at SJC on UQ St Lucia Campus [SLC], at
10am on Monday, 18 December, 2006, to collect that information
or to
inspect it.
If however, you maintain that that
request for access to documents, is
invalid, because, you reckon, that was an application only per FOI,
and SJC is not subject to FOI legislation, I will dispute that,
[and do and so I will still be there at SJC on UQ St Lucia Campus
[SLC], at 10am on Monday, 18 December, 2006, to collect that
information or to inspect it] [as you know that dispute is presently
with the Information Commissioner of Qld, and hinges upon whether SJC
was established by UQ, when, as you know, SJC was, and still is, a
partnership between UQ and the Brisbane Diocese of The Anglican Church
of Australia [BDAC]] but regardless, I will again apply for
Access to those documents per Schedule 3 Principle #6 of Privacy Act
1988 as appears below. I do that by this OPEN LETTER TO YOU.
So, even if SJC is/was not subject to
FOI, [regardless of what the Information Commissioner states], it is
and has been since soon after 1988, subject to the Privacy Act 1988
(Cth).
Additionally, pursuant to National
Privacy Principle #5 of Schedule 3 of
the legislation as below, I now ask SJC for that document, in which, clearly
expressed policies on SJC's management of personal information are set
out.
Please acknowledge receipt of this
communique.
Privacy Act
1988
Schedule 3—National
Privacy Principles
5 Openness
5.1 An organisation must set out in a document clearly
expressed policies on its management of personal information. The
organisation must make the document available to anyone who asks for it.
5.2 On request by a person, an organisation must take reasonable steps
to let the person know, generally, what sort of personal information it
holds, for what purposes, and how it collects, holds, uses and
discloses that information.
6
Access and correction
6.1 If an organisation holds personal information about an
individual, it must provide the individual with access to the
information on request by the individual, .......
-Kind regards,
********************************************************************
Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA
ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of
The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND
254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia Q4067.
Skype: russellmathews
Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email or Skype me.]
Email: ???? HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE
International students BEWARE of Australian universities
The "Judges are Corrupt" [WorldWide] Network.[members' links]
*******************************************************************
There is much CORRUPTION in Australia
but the majority
of it is concealed. THIS HAS MAJOR CONSEQUENCES FOR AUSTRALIA
POLICICALLY ON the WORLD STAGE. Australia attempts to
pontificate from the HIGH MORAL GROUND and be the “BULLY
OF THE PACIFIC”. America [USA – Bush] is
attempting to diminish its INTERNATIONAL crimes by seeming to
associate with a densizen of the “high moral ground”
[Australia], whereas in fact, AUSTRALIA IS RIFE WITH
CORRUPTION. The hidden corruption is spread across layers of
government, [elected and “public service”], POLICE,
[Queensland and Federal], the judiciary, legal profession, EDUCATION,
UNIVERSITIES and business. It occurs in many dimensions. Much of the
corruption is for the “cover-up” of incompetence, and
other corruption. Some members of my “family” have gained
some “inspiration” from some of this corruption,
utilising corruption in the legal profession and
judiciary.
The www is the ideal medium to present The
EVIDENCE
of this corruption when
that evidence is documented and the statements of others where those
statements are public records. I
WILL PUBLISH THE FACTUAL EVIDENCE HERE. My
purpose with this site is to assemble that evidence and the logical
linkage for the UNCHALLENGABLE CONCLUSION.
I have special skills in this respect. I am first and foremost a
MATHEMATICIAN with maths majors in my BSc and BA. As well, I am fully
trained to be admitted as a lawyer. I have practical experience in
many courts over many years and as an accountant and tax agent.
Quick Access
Who
is "HAIG"?
HAIG
concerns:
Contents/Sitemap SEARCH
this site
Opt-In
Emails/ SIGN UP.
Contact
HAIG
The
"Judges are Corrupt" [WorldWide] Network
Tertiary
Education in Australia Recycling
to save the Earth Water stupidity in Australia.
English
as a Second Language for Chinese.
Interests
for Chinese People
Coaching/Consulting
a
5 Openness
5.1 An organisation must set out in a document clearly
expressed policies on its management of personal information. The
organisation must make the document available to anyone who asks for it.
5.2 On request by a person, an organisation must take reasonable steps
to let the person know, generally, what sort of personal information it
holds, for what purposes, and how it collects, holds, uses and
discloses that information.
6 Access and correction
6.1 If an organisation holds personal information about an
individual, it must provide the individual with access to the
information on request by the individual, .......
a
CORRUPTION EXPOSED
fffffff
ggggg
hhhhh
eeeeeee