include("/home/russellm/public_html/CodingPHP/GlobalPHP_HeaderFunctionOfIP.php"); ?>
The University of Queensland: Is it defrauding the
Commonwealth of Australia??
e
NEW, from AustLawPublish ,
Alumni
Journals for the Australian Universities.
Check
if your University is there.
The University of Queensland [UQ]: Is it defrauding
the Commonwealth of Australia??
Is it doing this for the Beattie
labor government, and is the Beattie labor government, by its
Information Commissioner, assisting in this?
In the order
of $50 million per annum???
[go
to HAIG REPORT home frames]
There are TEN COLLEGES on the St Lucia
Campus of UQ. I
have here details of the St Johns College [SJC]. It is reasonable
to expect the the situation pertaining to SJC applies to the other nine
on an equivalent basis for an equivalent amount. The
physical college, LAND and ALL BUILDINGS, is beneficially OWNED by NO-ONE. UQ
provided the land by settling it on a trust with no beneficiary but where UQ has a
reversionary right, should the primary trusts fail, yet SJC pays UQ
absolutely nothing. It pays UQ NO RENT.
There are 48 subdivisions and two long road reserves in the site.
The buildings extend across the roads and subdivision boundaries.
Without the road reserves, the area of the subdivisions is 6.4 perches
less that six
and a half acres. In this location, the land
alone is worth $15 to $20 million. With the buildings, the
physical assets of SJC is worth $50 to $75 million. The
rent for these premises would be in the order of $5 to $7.5
million. For the ten colleges this is an annual LOSS TO UQ of
$50 to $75 million.
SJC website states that there are approximately 300 students at SJC.
During the university holidays, SJC attempts to earn more revenue from
hosting conferences. To determine the annual revenue, one could
extrapolate the weekly earnings during the university lecture period to
the whole year. Calculate an average of $200 each per week,
for the 52 weeks of the academic year, for the 300 students for a gross
annual revenue of $3.12 million. Clearly, it is an
uneconomic use of the assets of UQ. It is an irrefutable
tautology
that if an asset is being used uneconomically, THERE IS A BETTER USE OF
IT. That use is the use by which it obtains its greatest
value. Even at this use, of the $3 million plus annual revenue,
for SJC, it should be paying UQ in the order of $1.5 per
annum. For the 10
colleges, this is $15 million.
This is the minimum extra revenue that UQ should have each year,
and so not requiring from the Commonwealth Government. UQ
is making an "annual SECRET donation" to the
Anglican Church of $1.5 Million, as a HIDDEN
SUBSIDY. My concern is that it is SECRET and
HIDDEN. See below the DISHONESTY and PANIC of SJC and the
Anglican Church as they try to claim that they own SJC.
Apropos St Johns College: here is an aeriel photo of
SJC. The land and buildings of SJC is beneficially owned by
no-one, but the
UQ has a
reversionary right to be possessed of the land and buildings, should
the primary trusts fail,. The trustee is the
Corporation of the Synod of the
Diocese of Brisbane of the Anglican Church [synod] .
This is part of the
"constitution" of St Johns College [SJC] submitted by the warden
of SJC, the Reverend Canon Professor Dr [I am told he
really loves his titles - so RCPD, eh?] John Morgan to the
Registrar of UQ dated 25 July, 2003. A year later, the wording
was different. However, check out the Certificate of Title, below.
This is a doucment of SJC and of UQ as well. It is wrong.
It discloses much incompetence. It was clearly drafted by someone
associated with SJC or the Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of
Brisbane, and who is totaly ignorant and incompetent.. The Nomination
of Trustees and Schedule of Trusts for this land shows that the
"Corporation" as trustee for no-one but subject to the conditions on
the Schedule of Trusts. Those conditions were set by UQ were the
conditions upon which UQ was prepared to make the land available for a
residential college for Students of UQ. That would have to
make it seem that UQ had more than a passing role in the formation of
SJC on the St Lucia Campus [SLC] of UQ. In fact, UQ formed a CRUCIAL
ROLE. Yet, the Queensland Information Commissioner would have us
believe that UQ had nothing to do with the formation of SJC on SLC of
UQ. I AM STILL ARGUING WITH THEM ON THAT.
This is part of the
title
deed for the land on which the buildings now called SJC are
built. These documents mention two differently
dated Nominations of Trustees. I think it would be a
reasonable guess that the only possible beneficiary of the trust is in
fact UQ, and that is if and when the conditions per the Schedule of
Trusts fail. One
needs only consider the likely situation when synod became "seized" of
this land. Clearly, The Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese
of Brisbane [the Synod - synod], is NOT
seized of the freehold.
DISHONESTY
and PANIC of SJC and the Anglican Church as they try to claim that they
own SJC.
This is the email communique of RCPD John Morgan with me
recently [13 September, 2006].
Subject: How much
rent does SJC pay to UQ?
From:
Russell Mathews
Date:
9/13/2006 3:09 PM
To: "Rev.
Canon Prof. Dr John Morgan, Warden,St John's College, University of
Qld." <John.Morgan@mailbox.uq.edu.au>
Cc:
"Douglas Porter, Secretary and Registrar, The University of Queensland"
<d.porter@uq.edu.au>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello Rev. Canon
Prof. Dr Morgan,
I have just been turning my mind to the running of SJC. It has a
valuable block of land there: nearly six and a half acres.
That would be WORTH a pretty penny in rent. How much rent
does SJC pay to UQ annually, for the use of the LAND and
BUILDINGS? What is the total floor area of the buildings?
I suspect that the rent paid will be SUBSTANTIALLY LESS THAN IT IS
WORTH. In the current state of government
funding, UQ will not be able to justify requiring more money from
the Federal Government, if it is not optimising it own
assets. LEGALLY, UQ IS THE BENEFICIAL OWNER OF THAT SIX AND
A HALF ACRES, and the BUILDINGS ON IT.
How much rent do you, SJC, pay to UQ at present?
-Kind regards,
Russell G H Mathews
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Russell - the Colleges are the legal owners of the land on which
their buildings stand. They all purchased them from the
University.
best wishes
John
Morgan
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Really, is that so? And when would that have been? In the last
three years for instance?
Best wishes,
Russell Mathews.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No, Rusell in 1954 or 5 or something. I have no access to the
deed at present but I have seen all the documents and the certificate of
transfer. [see
note immediately below]
What are you trying to do on this?
best wishes
John
Morgan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, I gather that SJC pays UQ absolutely nothing? That is a big
subsidy.
RM.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry, Russell, I don't follow. It is not a subsidy. If you
own the land you own the land. we pay rates and pedestal
taxes to the city council.
Colleges provide a service to the university by providing a
home for a lot of rural/regional students.In other states colleges do
not pay local rates and taxes.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
{END}
Re:
certificate of transfer.
As you can see above, the actual document is called a ":Certificate of
TITLE". It does have the "synod" printed there on the top line in
CAPITALS. I suspect Morgan did not read as far as even the next line
of, "As Trustee".
Of course, the main document prepared by the conveyancer is the
'Transfer of Title" [too many "t's" I guess]. I wonder if
"confusion" is a concern for the Anglican
Diocese of Brisbane as RCPD Morgan is proud
to be a member of the Diocese's Real
Property Committee.
[Of course, RCPD Morgan has his PhD in Theology; ranking alongside
Quantum Physics as one of the harder disciplines. I am sure his
PhD research added greatly to the world's knowledge.] I wonder if
RCPD Morgan understood the "constitution", [even
that part of it above] attached to his letter in 2003 to the
Registrar of UQ, [as exhibited above: VII Property].
I think that is pretty clear: eh?
Now, let's see what Mr Peter Read,
General Manager, of the Anglican Diocese of Brisbane has to say on the
matter. The following are comments from a letter, dated 7
September, 2006, to me from the Information Commissioner [IC] for
Queensland, (Susan Barker), a Commission of the Queensland Beattie labor
Government..
Let us now consider who has what to gain. Since UQ at
present, beneficially owns the land and buildings of SJC, [there
is little else tangible and of any real value], the "synod" has much to
gain: the tangible land and buildings worth $50 to $75 million.
As for UQ, maybe it wants to "help" the Anglican Church and is being
compromised by the Beattie labor government. As for the Beattie
labor government: by causing the Commonwealth government to spend an
extra $50 million in Queensland by giving it to UQ, that is $50 million
the Federal Government cannot spend or give elsewhere and still have
the same budgetry affect. SJC and the other colleges will still
be spending that money in Queensland, whether they pay it as rent to
UQ or elsewhere in Queensland. The only difference is
if the Colleges spend the $50 million elsewhere, [because the Federal
Government is led to believe that UQ does not own it], Queensland has
an extra $50 million being spent in the economy initially, and with
multiplifier affect, that is an increase of State GDP of about $200 to
$250 million. Did I hear someone say that Beattie would not do
that to Howard and Costello? You have heard of the Police
"air wing"?
Now, the Information
Commissioner
should have the basic legal knowledge or be able to pay to receive it,
to know that when an entity owns something "As Trustee", that a
trust is formed which means there may be a beneficiary. [The
absence of a
trust, means the legal title holder or legal "owner" is also the
beneficial owner.] So as soon as there is a trust disclosed, it
probably means the legal title holder is NOT the
beneficiary. When that part of the
constitution is read, one is given a good idea of the identity of the
beneficiary.
So, one has to wonder the reason that the Information Commissioner gets
the law so wrong, as to hold that UQ has no proprietary rights over
SJC, as in viz:
She is actually referring to that Certificate
of Title above [Volume 3086 Folio 38] which has on the second line
"As Trustee".
I have spent many years studying at The University of Queensland [UQ],
having four Undergraduate degrees from UQ. I already had one
degree and much cross credit from UQ, before I realised how I was being
cheated and since then, I have had to
contend with repeated bullying and cheating of me by UQ. I will
produce that EVIDENCE [SUB-TITLE of this site - allusion to my LLB],
later. I am still in Brisbane, and now doing my PhD with two
supervisors at opposite ends of Australia; Monash and Central
Queensland. It is progressing well and my supervisors are quite
enthusiastic with my progress, with a grade of HD/7on some progressive
submisssion.
When one is bullied and cheated, that person is always put down so that
the bullies try to obtain to the HIGHER MORAL GROUND. Hence, I do
not expect anyone to just take my word. I rely on DOCUMENTED
THIRD PARTY EVIDENCE. The INTERNET [WWW] is
ideal for this.
[go
to HAIG REPORT home]