HAIG    REPORT:    GoTo [on this page] HaigReport's Menu Of Themes of Menus for our thousands of pages
TIPS for
Navigating HaigReport:  If you arrived at this page, referred from a Search Engine such as Google et al, your URL link will NOT have an #Anchor/Marker to take you to the relevant spot on this page.  In that case, we do recommend that you view our "Latest HaigReport Promotions" of recent additions to our websites, by Clicking Here.  It will open in a new Browser window. 

If
you Click Here, you will be taken, usually, to the specific Unique Content on this page, for which you were most likely seeking.  However, if you Click Here, you will be taken to the Top of the HaigReport Header, below on this page. 

However, if you have arrived at this page from another of our Website pages, your link will usually have an #Anchor, also called a marker, which will take you to the intended specific spot on the page where that marker is positioned.  In fact, it will probably take you there prior to your reading this.  Moving to that Anchor is the final step in the loading of this page.

 HAIG     REPORT:   Is now on  twitter  [from 2nd June, 2013]  link to us HERE on twitter     See our Twitter Strategy    

 HAIG    REPORT:  SEE: Russell Mathews' COMMENTARY:    Russell Mathews' [BCom BSc LLB & BA] current TOPICAL commentary on GOVERNMENT, politics & business     Press to READ       Press for MENU   

 HAIG    REPORT:    WANTED:
Healthy female "dog" to breed with Parson Russell Terrier, to produce ASSISTANCE DOGS.   Rochedale South QLD 4123
I wish to breed from my Parson Russell Terrier. He is a trained assistance dog. He has a wonderful nature. The breed of his mate could be varied or a cross; eg Parson Russell Terrier, Jack Russell Terrier, Beagle, Bull Terrier, Bull mastiff, Staffy, and/or Fox Terrier plus many others. She does not need to be "pedigreed". I am very protective of my dogs. She will become very valuable to me and become one of my assistance "dogs". If we can assist each other, please contact me on my contact form, including your email address and your landline phone number so I can phone you to discuss. 

Because I am disabled and have an LLB [so therefore understand the Law surrounding disabilities and assistance dogs] I am now branching out to providing Assistance dogs to disabled persons [even if disabled in only a minor way and so not even realizing it]. This is not a business proposition but rather just a very necessary service I can offer to the community.
Many people have a disability and do not realize their ailment or "problem" is by law, the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA], classified as a "disability". This is especially so for people getting on in years, and who have a dog, and are maybe moving to accommodation where they are told they cannot take their dog. In a majority of cases, those people cannot be legally forced to surrender their animal/dog.
I will be assisting those person who already have dogs, but are being forced, unlawfully, to dispose of them because maybe they are moving accommodation. I can train your existing dogs to be assistance dogs and provide the documentation as required by the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA]. I do not intend to charge for this, but just maybe cover some marginal costs.

 Click here  to Learn how your Personalized Alert Notice [IMMEDIATELY ABOVE] is prepared by our HAIG Unique Visitor Algorithm: [HUVA] or  Click here  to see your UNIQUE Personalized Alert Notice in a new Browser Window.


 Judges Cannot Ignore Judicial Notice: Detailed ALRC102:


My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies. The HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies.

   It is Our legal, social and moral DUTY to EXPOSE CRIME, FRAUD & CORRUPTION plus Lying and Hypocrisy in Public Life, Including Judges & magistrates 
 

Fraud, Corruption & attempted  MURDER 
covered-up by Queensland police, EXPOSED 

DirectoryWebsite/header.php

We Can't Trust catholics, So WHY Vote for catholics?

commonheader.php

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.  
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      EMAIL us anytime:  Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay. 

considerevidence.php

Consider the evidence! Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay.  

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Judges Cannot Ignore Judicial Notice: Detailed ALRC102

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for We Can't Trust catholics, So WHY Vote for catholics?

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Judges Cannot Ignore Judicial Notice: Detailed ALRC102

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:

 Content: Judges Cannot Ignore Judicial Notice: Detailed ALRC102

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for We Can't Trust catholics, So WHY Vote for catholics?

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

Judges Cannot Ignore Judicial Notice: Detailed ALRC102:

Content: /CodingPHP/JudicialNoticeDetailedALRC102.php Judicial Notice is an important doctrine of Evidence for the Rule of Law in Common Law jurisdictions.

So that the reader can understand the importance and relevance, especially in relation to CORRUPT ACTS by GOVERNMENT, I refer to the Authoritative Australian Law Reform Commission Report 102, Sec 144 as at

https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/uniform-evidence-law-alrc-report-102/17-judicial-notice/section-144-judicial-notice-of-matters-of-common-knowledge/
=====>  THE FOLLOWING INDENTED, is text from ALRC 102; [with my emphasis and Edit]:
Section 144: Judicial notice of matters of common knowledge

What is ‘common knowledge’ [INCLUDES (b) below] for the purpose of judicial notice?

17.9 Section 144 mirrors the common law doctrine of judicial notice as it relates to matters of common knowledge.[9] Section 144(1) provides:

Proof is not required about knowledge that is not reasonably open to question and is:

(a) common knowledge in the locality in which the proceeding is being held or generally; or

(b) capable of verification by reference to a document the authority of which cannot reasonably be questioned.  [ie GOVERNMENT or COURT DOCUMENTS.].  

[EDIT: That states  "a document", but, I submit that can  apply to a series of CONNECTED documents, if those documents are IMPERATIVE LEGISLATION, and GOVERNMENT & COURT RECORDS, especially if those connected documents PROVE GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION AND CORRUPTION BY JUDGES AND COURTS. 
These corrupt judges, corrupt public servants and corrupt lawyers, have continually dug themselves into deeper and  deeper holes.
Many crimes have been committed against me over many years.  I do not need to consider them all at this stage to prove the extensive corruption by catholic judges,. public servants.
https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/uniform-evidence-law-alrc-report-102/17-judicial-notice/section-144-judicial-notice-of-matters-of-common-knowledge/ is about JUDICIAL NOTICE.
In the decision Attorney-General (Qld) v Mathews [2020] QSC 258, of Hearing Date: 24 August 2020 ,  the corrupt judge David Jackson states,
at para[62] on page 16, "Lastly, if truth is a defence, in my view, the evidence does not fairly raise an issue that requires the possible defence to be considered."

It DOES NOT HAVE TO BE RAISED IN EVIDENCE by a witness or other rule of evidence.  This is a case where JUDICIAL NOTICE MUST HAVE BEEN HAD.  In fact, in these series of "judicial decisions", JUDICIAL NOTICE should have been had long ago, IN EVERY MATTER.


 https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/uniform-evidence-law-alrc-report-102/17-judicial-notice/section-144-judicial-notice-of-matters-of-common-knowledge/
confirms the  COMMON LAW, AND STATES,

"How does a judge acquire ‘common knowledge’?

17.13 Section 144(2) allows a judge to acquire common knowledge or knowledge sourced in an authoritative document in any way that the judge thinks fit [ie THERE IS NO LIMIT]. A court (including a jury, if there is one) must take such knowledge into account (s 144(3)).

[Edit:  Because a judge, [and for that matter counsel for the other side], have a duty to ensure the court makes the CORRECT decision, and so to obtain all relevant JUDICIAL NOTICE, they cannot  just let it "slip their mind", nor choose to not acquire the judicial notice EVIDENCE.   They are trained to know the law and matters or facts pleaded that requires the judge to take JUDICIAL NOTICE.  As neither party has to have a witness nor any rule of evidence enter the evidence before the court, then before the judge delivers his decision, THAT EVIDENCE IN THE GOVERNMENT AND COURT "AUTHORITATIVE DOCUMENTS" is before the court.  If JUDICIAL NOTICE EVIDENCE is totally inconsistent with his delivered "judgement", then that is prima facie evidence that that judge [and counsel] are corrupt.   Can the reader now understand the reason that no Supreme Court of Qld judge wishes to adjudicate in any matter involving myself, especially if the corrupt government is the party opposing me. ]

Just to add a little.  Some snippets of Online research re Judicial Notice:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_notice

Judicial notice is a rule in the law of evidence that allows a fact to be introduced into evidence if the truth of that fact is so notorious or well known, or so authoritatively attested, that it cannot reasonably be doubted. This is done upon the request of the party seeking to rely on the fact at issue. Facts and materials admitted under judicial notice are accepted without being formally introduced by a witness or other rule of evidence, and they are even admitted if one party wishes to plead evidence to the contrary.
--------------------
JUDICIAL NOTICE I. INTRODUCTION The doctrine of judicial ...heinonline.org › hol-cgi-bin › get_pdf › alblr18

Judicial notice is taken of matters of both law and fact. With respect to matters of domestic law, the judge is assumed to know the law. "Knowledge of the law, or the ...

by AR Flanz - 1980 - Cited by 5 - Related articles




Menu: We Can't Trust catholics, So WHY Vote for catholics?: