HAIG    REPORT:    GoTo [on this page] HaigReport's Menu Of Themes of Menus for our thousands of pages
TIPS for
Navigating HaigReport:  If you arrived at this page, referred from a Search Engine such as Google et al, your URL link will NOT have an #Anchor/Marker to take you to the relevant spot on this page.  In that case, we do recommend that you view our "Latest HaigReport Promotions" of recent additions to our websites, by Clicking Here.  It will open in a new Browser window. 

If
you Click Here, you will be taken, usually, to the specific Unique Content on this page, for which you were most likely seeking.  However, if you Click Here, you will be taken to the Top of the HaigReport Header, below on this page. 

However, if you have arrived at this page from another of our Website pages, your link will usually have an #Anchor, also called a marker, which will take you to the intended specific spot on the page where that marker is positioned.  In fact, it will probably take you there prior to your reading this.  Moving to that Anchor is the final step in the loading of this page.

 HAIG     REPORT:   Is now on  twitter  [from 2nd June, 2013]  link to us HERE on twitter     See our Twitter Strategy    

 HAIG    REPORT:  SEE: Russell Mathews' COMMENTARY:    Russell Mathews' [BCom BSc LLB & BA] current TOPICAL commentary on GOVERNMENT, politics & business     Press to READ       Press for MENU   

 HAIG    REPORT:    WANTED:
Healthy female "dog" to breed with Parson Russell Terrier, to produce ASSISTANCE DOGS.   Rochedale South QLD 4123
I wish to breed from my Parson Russell Terrier. He is a trained assistance dog. He has a wonderful nature. The breed of his mate could be varied or a cross; eg Parson Russell Terrier, Jack Russell Terrier, Beagle, Bull Terrier, Bull mastiff, Staffy, and/or Fox Terrier plus many others. She does not need to be "pedigreed". I am very protective of my dogs. She will become very valuable to me and become one of my assistance "dogs". If we can assist each other, please contact me on my contact form, including your email address and your landline phone number so I can phone you to discuss. 

Because I am disabled and have an LLB [so therefore understand the Law surrounding disabilities and assistance dogs] I am now branching out to providing Assistance dogs to disabled persons [even if disabled in only a minor way and so not even realizing it]. This is not a business proposition but rather just a very necessary service I can offer to the community.
Many people have a disability and do not realize their ailment or "problem" is by law, the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA], classified as a "disability". This is especially so for people getting on in years, and who have a dog, and are maybe moving to accommodation where they are told they cannot take their dog. In a majority of cases, those people cannot be legally forced to surrender their animal/dog.
I will be assisting those person who already have dogs, but are being forced, unlawfully, to dispose of them because maybe they are moving accommodation. I can train your existing dogs to be assistance dogs and provide the documentation as required by the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA]. I do not intend to charge for this, but just maybe cover some marginal costs.

 Click here  to Learn how your Personalized Alert Notice [IMMEDIATELY ABOVE] is prepared by our HAIG Unique Visitor Algorithm: [HUVA] or  Click here  to see your UNIQUE Personalized Alert Notice in a new Browser Window.


 Legal: Re Fraud, Corrupt Qld Public Sector Void Charges Of Me:


My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies. The HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies.

   It is Our legal, social and moral DUTY to EXPOSE CRIME, FRAUD & CORRUPTION plus Lying and Hypocrisy in Public Life, Including Judges & magistrates 
 

Fraud, Corruption & attempted  MURDER 
covered-up by Queensland police, EXPOSED 

DirectoryWebsite/header.php

We Can't Trust catholics, So WHY Vote for catholics?

commonheader.php

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.  
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      EMAIL us anytime:  Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay. 

considerevidence.php

Consider the evidence! Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay.  

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Legal: Re Fraud, Corrupt Qld Public Sector Void Charges Of Me

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for We Can't Trust catholics, So WHY Vote for catholics?

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Legal: Re Fraud, Corrupt Qld Public Sector Void Charges Of Me

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:

 Content: Legal: Re Fraud, Corrupt Qld Public Sector Void Charges Of Me

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for We Can't Trust catholics, So WHY Vote for catholics?

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

Legal: Re Fraud, Corrupt Qld Public Sector Void Charges Of Me:

Content: TextPoliceNullityMagistratesJudgesActWithoutJurisdictionKnowItSoCorrupt Content: /CodingPHP/includedNoteJudicialTortureOfMeKnownToJudiciaryByJudicialNotice All information herein is available on authorative documents or is Common Knowledge, so  is already evidence before all magistrates and judges by JUDICIAL NOTICE.

What has been done to me by the Qld corrupt courts in conjunction with corrupt police and Qld corrupt  public sector  has amounted to "JUDICIAL TORTURE".  This  has been  an ongoing fraud of myself by the corrupt  catholic public sector of Qld including the courts since 1985 or earlier.  It has been aimed at destroying me financially and emotionally.   It is still continuing with charges against me by elements of the public sector including corrupt Qld Attorney-General Yvette D'ath, corrupt police, corrupt public sector parasites in the Ipswich City Council [ICC], including  catholics Peter Bartley and Kevin low-life Lynch.   Many magistrates and judges have also been knowingly, by Judicial Notice, involved in this emotional  and financial torture of me. 

Any  magistrate who makes any order apart from dismissal, in this matter v ICC, will be knowingly corrupt, and since that will be the truth, I am at liberty to publish that.  All their crimes, wrongs and corruption have been aggravated in nature because I am disabled and known to them, by Judicial Notice, to be disabled.

Importantly, he can ignore my submissions, at his own peril, because, by JUDICIAL NOTICE,  all this is known to him.  Since low-life Lynch, catholic solicitor for the corrupt  Ipswich City Council [ICC] is duty bound, as an aditted member of the Supreme Court of Qld [SCQ] [albeit corrupt], to assist this court, and all courts,. make the correct decision, he should not be mute on  the matters of my submission, for his own benefit, as that will  be the TRUTH, and be not mute, not necessarily for my benefit.

The repeated actions by the corrupt catholic MLA for Ipswich, Jennifer Ruth Howard, of reporting to police, my audio political announcements to drivers and passengers stopped at red traffic lights across the road from my home, as being excessive noise, and the actions by Qld police in jumping my fence when  Implied consent to enter has been removed, trespassing in my yard and giving me corrupt Noise Abatement Directives, are all  CONTINUATIONS of the BAD FAITH actions by the Qld government and Qld public sector towards me, supporting  the Judicial Notice evidence known to judges and magistrates and which I have detailed in these pages on HaigReport and documents to ALL Ipswich Magistrates via the Ipswich Magistrates Court Registry, that making all legal actions against me ultra vires, beyond power, void ab initio, invalid and nullities.

../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/IMG_20201108_181524_447_tnFourAudioHornsOnSignsAt119BrisbaneRd.jpg
../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/IMG_20201216_090935_839FourAudioHornsOnSignsJenniferHowardJudgeMorrisonCorrupt_tn.jpg
As you can see I have added an extra dimension to my "political communication"; audio. 

The corrupt catholic clique and cabal of parasites in the Qld government, including police and courts are displaying their corruption in continuing to try to silence me.   I assure you, I will win this one TOO.

I am composing this communique for multiple purposes; to advise various parties and and to report on HaigReport.com/ that ALL charges by the Qld government [police] and the Ipswich City Council [ICC], an authority of the Qld government, all staffed corruptly by corrupt catholics, against me, are just more of the, totally absolute catholic corruption I am exposing with my Political Communication [Signs, Audio and HaigReport.com/ SUBTITLED: "The EVIDENCE"], such that these void ab initio, charges have been initiated by corrupt catholics, solely for the purpose of trying to counter my exposure of the endemic catholic corruption. Judges and magistrates are catholics appointed with the  expectation that they will be part of the endemic catholic corruption.    All judges and magistrates cannot be sacked, so before they are "appointed" they are placed in "sensitive" positions such as court registrars, acting magistrates, positions in the corrupt CMC now CCC and similar sensitive positions where they will encounter substantial corruption which they are expected to "approve", [so giving their "masters" evidence so as to keep them on the straight and narrow "path of corruption"].  This is what I am fighting, and the "smoking gun" is just the tip of the iceberg.  The fact the corrupt catholic mammoth in the Qld public sector, has engaged is indicative of the probable identity of the other four apart from Roney and Sue in the fraud that was defrauding the Commonwealth of Australia.  That aggravated fraud was probably not an isolated event, but a regular event.  So, since they could not recover the "smoking gun" what could they do?  Well, destroy me.  They even tried to kill me with involvement  of the Qld police, ie involvement of the Qld government.  First they tried to give me a criminal record, but I won on Appeal [see below]. sabotaged my business of Accountant and Tax Agent by sabotaging my business phones, so bankrupting me and my business, lobbied the Tax Agents' Board of Qld to deregister me to deny me an ability to make a living, so I went back to Uni to obtain a PhD in Maths, my passion.  The corrupt catholic parasites then clandestinely lobbied the uni to cheat me repeatedly. I tried to gain redress through the courts but the corrupt catholic parasite public servants  corruptly  applied to the Supreme court to have me declared a  vexatious litigant which corrupt catholics judges did readily.  The corrupt catholic police and Qld government then did an armed robbery and break and enter into my home which I beneficially owned, with the aim of making me homeless, which they did.  All my life since I was aged 17. I have been disabled with ABI, [acquired Brain injury - brain damage from repeated head injuries including the assassination attempt in 1996 that put me in hospital for 16 days.   I was lucky to even survive.

I have fought back; from 2006 with websites mainly HaigReport.com/.  Having been on a disability pension, in 2006, corrupt tax office parasites stuffed up my tax returns [I  had been a Reg tax agent and BCom accountant] so corrupt parasites in Centrelink could then cancel my pension.  It took me 'til 2009 to recover it.  While homeless I lived in a shipping container, which I have had to have moved many times, lived frugally,
lived without a motor vehicle [that saves a lot of money], saved my pension, invested the progressive savings in shares.  The parasites have repeated tried to silence my websites, but failed.  They thought they had silenced me for good, when in December, 2017, they declared me a vexatious litigant.  Thankfully, I am self reliant.

The corruption directed at me is just a small part of the endemic catholic corruption in Qld government including the CCC, [and anyone or "organisation" associated with the CCC].  That corruption is in the government.  It is political.  The Australian Constitution includes because Australia is, by the  Constitution, a voting democracy, the "Freedom of Political Communication"; that is that no Australian Government can legislate to unfairly restrict "political discourse".  I am doing that with HaigReport.com, and importantly, my signs at my home at 119 Brisbane Road, Booval on the main  road between Brisbane and Ipswich.  My political audio is similarly protected, but I have yet to make the corrupt police know that the parasite corrupt catholic parasite MLA for Ipswich Jennifer Ruth Howard cannot make legitimate complaints against the content [or even language] of my political audio.

../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/IMG_20201216_090935_839FourAudioHornsOnSignsJenniferHowardJudgeMorrisonCorrupt_tn.jpg
As you can see I have added an extra dimension to my "political communication"; audio.

The reader/viewer can gather the extent of the substantial rise in the road past my home by considering the steps in the panels in the front fence, as in photo below.

../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/IMG_20201216_090935_839FourAudioHornsOnSignsJenniferHowardJudgeMorrisonCorrupt_tn.jpg
The visitor to this page can gather the proximity of my home to the electoral office of the corrupt catholic menopausal slut Jennifer Ruth Howard [40 metres between them] by viewing the photo below.
../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/IMG_20210103_150133_526_tnProximityMyPlaceAudioToJenniferHowardWithRise.jpg

One can gather further idea of the slope of the rise past my home by considering the two photos below.  The first shows where the rising slope in the level of the road begins.  The second shows how the rise continues past my home  to the crest in the road about 100 metres further on.
../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/IMG_20210103_153320_890_tnPhotoShowingWhereRoadBeginsToRise.jpg

../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/IMG_20210103_153355_020_tnPhotoShowingHowRoadRisesToCrestPastMyHome.jpg

I now have wonderful additional exposure from  signs, and, as you can see from the photos above, from my four audio horns/flares.  I connected it all up, and it all worked first time.  Because of the  Constitutional "Freedom of Political Communication", it cannot be banned outright. It may be legitimate  to balance it against any other "community benefit".  That community benefit could only be volume level in decibels,
of any other noise, to which I and my neighbours are regularly subjected, which we are forced to accept and for which we have presumably "adjusted", compared to the volume in decibels of my political audio.  Fortunately, the volume of noise from the traffic, as it accelerates away from being stationary at the traffic lights, in two lanes up the rise past my home and the electoral office of the corrupt catholic MLA menopausal slut, Jennifer Ruth Howard.

Judges of the Supreme Court of Qld [I name six below together with detail of their corruption] are now running for cover such that all are unwilling to sit on any case with me as a defendant of charges or claims by the corrupt catholic clique and cabal of parasites of the Qld government.   It seems magistrates are slower to realize they are disclosing their corruption by acting without jurisdiction to continue police and ICC charges against me. That is what is expected of them because that is the reason  that they gained the promotion to Magistrate. This "
acting without jurisdiction" was done by magistrates and judges, including repeatedly by the now retired but corrupt catholic [ex Marist Bros Ashgrove, "Corruption Academy"], Chief District Court Judge, Kerry John O'Brien [KJOB].  Try the  search;
<site:HaigReport.com
Kerry John O'Brien KJOB>, first on
Google
<site:HaigReport.com Kerry John O'Brien KJOB> with 3, 5, 8, 13 links removed from the first four respective pages,and then on
Bing
<site:HaigReport.com Kerry John O'Brien KJOB> just to see the many pages that the corrupt catholic little prick ex tenant of mine Peter John Roney [also ex Marist Bros Ashgrove, "Corruption Academy"], has corruptly had Google censure because I have published the "smoking gun" of his admission of major fraud by himself, plus more catholic criminals, a medical doctor, a psychiatrist, his then whore of a girlfriend Sue, and two others, including the most likely "architect" of the catholic fraud, KJOB. See:
  1. Google Supports catholic mafia ORGANIZED CRIME defraud Australia:

  2. Criminal catholic mafia Peter Roney Defraud Google Censure Truth:
The factual situation is that in relation to the five charges against me by Qld police, i.e. Qld government AND the three charges against me by the Ipswich City Council [ICC], an authority of the Qld government, all magistrates and judges HAVE NO JURISDICTION, but for common/similar and extra different reasons.  If the magistrates or judges purport to act in any of these, THEY ARE ACTING WITHOUT JURISDICTION, and they know it.  Because they know ab initio, that their purported orders are nullities, they have JUDICIAL NOTICE, then if the order has an adverse effect upon ANYONE, then that magistrate or judge is CORRUPT.  Any purported "adjournment" orders are nullities. as are any "orders to appear".   Additionally. all bail  conditions are nullities.   The magistrate or judge should announce s/he has no jurisdiction and retire from the court.  This is because, for each  action, in the case of the police, and ICC, from the beginning of each matter, they acted beyond their power, ultra vires, and hence their action was void ab initio, such that each matter was a NULLITY even before they pretended to engage the magistrates courts.

It is regular occurrence that police, local government and rspca purport to commence proceeding in the magistrates  courts of Qld, when they do not have power to  so act, so the charges are ultra vires [beyond their powers], void ab initio [invalid from initiation] not merely voidable [voidable means may be deemed invalid by a subsequent judicial officer], and magistrates  ALWAYS continue the proceedings when the magistrates HAVE NO JURISDICTION.

This is also the case for the ICC, but for common/similar and extra different but sufficient reasons that they acted beyond their powers. 

I quote Div 3 Sec 36 Local Government Act 2009(Qld) [LGA2009], with my emphasis:   [This is Qld law and ALL magistrates and judges are deemed to know this law.]

36 Election advertising
(1) A local government must not make a local law that—
(a) prohibits or regulates the distribution of how-to-vote cards; or
(b) prohibits the placement of election signs or posters.
(2) A how-to-vote card includes a how-to-vote card under the Electoral Act.
(3) An election sign or poster is a sign or poster that is able, or is intended, to—
(a) influence a person about voting at any government election; or
(b) affect the result of any government election.
(4) A government election is an election for a local, State or Commonwealth government.
(5) A local law, to the extent that it is contrary to this section, has no effect.
Just to commence an action, or to sign an application by the ICC, the "officer" is an "officer" by virtue of a "local law".  Here, the Qld parliament by Sec 36 LGA2009, has attempted to prevent the little public sector parasites, of the ICC, attempting to subvert The Australian Constitution.

This effectively legislates the Australian Constitution's "Freedom of Political Communication" as relates to the corrupt catholic clique of the ICC.

[For the same reason as above, the Qld parliament has legislated  Sec 359D(c) [&(e)] of the Criminal Code(Qld).]  VIZ:

359D Particular conduct that is not unlawful stalking
Unlawful stalking does not include the following acts—
(a)
(b)
(c) acts done for the purposes of a genuine political or other genuine public dispute or issue carried on in the public interest;
(d)
(e) reasonable conduct engaged in by a person to obtain or give information that the person has a legitimate interest in obtaining or giving.

apro pos the matter MAG-00081076/20(1); from the beginning of each of their three charges, the ICC acted beyond their power, ultra vires, and hence their action was void ab initio, such that each matter was a NULLITY even before they pretended to engage the magistrates courts and invoke the jurisdiction of the magistrates court, which  invocation did not eventuate.   By Div 3 Sec 36 of the Local Government Act 2009, they are specifically denied any power with respect to election advertising, as defined widely in that section.  My political communication signs, and now my four audio horns/flares [as seen in the photos below] meet that definition.   They have no power with respect to my signs or audio.   

Staff of the ICC are officers of ICC by virtue of one or more local laws.   That or those local laws have "no effect" as any further action re election signs by that officer is contrary to the above sec 36 LGA2009. He cannot avoid acting under or pursuant to a "local law".   The constitutional "Freedom of Political communication", means that no state or local law can "burden" of "restrict" political communication when a "balancing test" has been applied.

The "community interest" against which my audio communication  must be balanced, is the relative volume of other ambient noise/sounds.  Excessive noise is unpleasant, and possibly unhealthy, to the community.   My audio, being political communication, does not have to be of a lower volume than all other noise and sounds.  Given the "political communication" is not in itself bad, but, is, in itself desirable in a "representative democracy".  

For the identical volume in decibels of political communication compared to the volume of the sound/noise emanating from the unmuffled or poorly muffled engine of a car, truck or motorbike, accelerating away from being stationary at traffic lights up a rise past my home, which if any, is preferable?   To the justices of the High Court of Australia, political communication is to be encouraged.  I doubt that those justices would hold a similar volume of traffic noise of vehicles accelerating away from traffic light up a rise is as desirable or at all.  If the Qld government/police finds it acceptable to have that level of sound or volume, in decibels of ambient noise in  my location; noise which I and my neighbours have to endue, and so have probably found a way of "dealing" with it; soundproofing for example, then the police should follow the example set by the High Court of Australia and accept that volume for my audio.  In fact, the volume of my audio is substantially lower than that. Another source of  load traffic noise, past my home are the sirens of police, fire brigade and ambulances.
All information herein is available on authorative documents or is Common Knowledge, so  is already evidence before all magistrates and judges by JUDICIAL NOTICE.

All information herein is available on authorative documents or is Common Knowledge, so  is already evidence before all magistrates and judges by JUDICIAL NOTICE.

../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/IMG_20201108_181524_447_tnFourAudioHornsOnSignsAt119BrisbaneRd.jpg
../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/IMG_20201216_090935_839FourAudioHornsOnSignsJenniferHowardJudgeMorrisonCorrupt_tn.jpg

As I explain below, all magistrates and judges know this by JUDICIAL NOTICE. I was not supposed to know this. Because lawyers are corrupt, [they have to be so to survive in the corrupt court system, or seek another "profession"], or they would be mercilessly attacked by the courts, judges and magistrates, and corrupt  government lawyers who will  allow all nullities to "proceed".  It seems by the  actions of the judges of the Supreme Court of Qld [SCQ] all judges already realized I know this. 

../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/20201102_20191031DickheadCatholicWankerIllegallyCorruptlyMeasuringElectionBanner02.jpg
In these matters, an Ipswich City Council [ICC] corrupt catholic parasite named Peter Bartley disliked my political signs exposing the extensive catholic corruption in Qld, so decided he would use the non-existent powers of the ICC in relation to election advertising [banned by Sec 36, Local Government Act 2009(Qld)] to attack me, and WASTE RATEPAYERS MONEY FOR HIS PERSONAL REASONS.   That is the definition of  CORRUPTION.  This prick photographed measuring my CONSTITUTIONALLY DEMOCRACY PROTECTED FREEDOM OF POLITICAL COMMUNICATION BANNER is a CRIMINAL.

The photo to the left shows this fuckwit catholic trespassing in my yard, together with a couple of piglets aka fanny pigs and other ICC parasites, having forced entry with a void ab initio purported "warrant".
This dickhead did not have the power to seek the warrant, and the then Acting magistrate Jason Schubert did not have the authority to issue the warrant.  This then acting magistrate 
Jason Schubert had had substantial experience around the magistrates ../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/IMG_20191104_093731PoliceAndICCTrespassersMyHome_tn.jpgcourts of Qld.  Regardless, he is deemed to know the law, SO HE DID know the law, AND HE DID KNOW THAT HE DID NOT HAVE POWER TO ISSUE  a warrant in those circumstances. The reason is that because the  application was ultra vires / beyond power, EVERYTHING THAT FOLLOWED WAS ALSO, ultra vires. The "Warrant to Enter" was a nullity.  Therefore, all that entered my yard were unlawfully there and were trespassers.  Schubert cannot say he did not know the law.  These parasites do not provide the affidavit and applications for Warrants, to me, so I was supposed to be kept in the dark. If I had had a solicitor, he would not have acquired them, but I acquired them because that is my right and they cannot deny me.  The  application and affidavit clearly showed photos of my signs which were, by the definition in Sec 36, Local Government Act 2009(Qld), "election advertising".  Given that, the only conclusion that can be drawn is the the NOW Magistrate Jason Schubert was then corrupt and is now corrupt.

All police matters coram the magistrates courts are NULLITIES, so the jurisdiction of the courts is not engaged.  This is the case also for ICC charges, for slightly different reasons, which I will detail  below, although, as I explain that is not necessary.

../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/IMG_20201216_090935_839FourAudioHornsOnSignsJenniferHowardJudgeMorrisonCorrupt_tn.jpg

../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/IMG_20201108_181524_447_tnFourAudioHornsOnSignsAt119BrisbaneRd.jpg

A magistrate Kinsella refused to consider that the matter was void ab initio, and advised that I could raise that later.  The point was that the matter was void ab initio, so he did not have jurisdiction.  That means he did not have the power to even  adjourn the proceedings.  Perchance parliament had purported to "legislate" that  a defendant in a criminal  prosecution could not, at first instance, raise the matter that the police had acted beyond power, and that the police prosecution was invalid from the very beginning.  Such parliamentary action refutes the rule of law because that would mean that police can prosecute actions where there is no guilt or reason to prosecute just to stuff people around.  This is what they are still  trying to do to me.  

The past  11 charges,  after prolonged  harassment and stuffing around of myself by police, were finalized in my favour.  All prosecutions were void ab initiobut many magistrates acted when they did not have any jurisdiction.  That is part of the corruption of the courts in Qld.  That means police can arbitrarily  "punish"  anyone by prosecuting them for no proper reason, when the person has done nothing wrong or illegal, because corrupt magistrates, and judges, will perpetuate the hassle and disruption that is caused to the person by the void ab initio charge.

The past 11 charges laid against me by the corrupt Qld police were finalized in my favour.   They were all void ab initio, yet I was forced to waste my time being hassled and disrupted by the corrupt Qld government, on risk of being punished further by fine or prison .

There are a number of ways that the police prosecutions, the previous 11 and the current eight, are ultra vires so void ab initio.

improper purpose;
bad faith -
Irrelevant Considerations
- This is the most important ultra vires ground. If it can be shown that a government body, in reaching its conclusions, took into account factors that were not relevant to the matter, or failed to consider matters that were relevant, the court can intervene. In order to decide what is relevant it is necessary to compare the reasons given for the decision or action with those permitted by the Act, or disallowed by Sec 359D(c) Criminal Code(Qld).   In respect of all signs, the most important factor was that they were protected by the Australian Constitution's "Freedom of Political Communication".
Improper Purpose
- This is probably the second most common ultra vires ground. Often, the same factual situation will justify court action on the basis of both irrelevant consideration and improper purpose. Strictly speaking, the claim here is that the decision or action, although on its face proper under the law, is designed to achieve a purpose which is beyond the responsibilities of the government body.  The purpose was not that I had broken any law, but rather that I had to be hassled and disrupted to  I would not expose the corruption of the

Unreasonableness
- because
359D(3) Qld Criminal Code specifically states that this is not unlawful stalking. That decision to charge me and to apply for a search warrant, is so unreasonable that no reasonable body would have reached it.  What I am contending is that it is so unreasonable an application of the law that it goes beyond the inferred limits of the power; not merely inferred but specific limits of the power, limited by sec 359D(c) Qld Criminal Code. 

Bad Faith- To attack an administrative action on the ground of bad faith it is necessary to show that the decision was affected by corruption [as I show here, below], bribery or similar malpractice.

The corruption by the police and the Qld government including courts, JUDGES AND MAGISTRATES, and the CMC now CCC, is phenomenal.  It is extensive in  time, number of instances and degree.

When published on HaigReport.com/, I will not include a copy of that webpage but just the URL link to it.  For provision of this document to courts, and elected reps, I include the specifics of the webpages at
  1. Named Corrupt catholic labor Judges CoverUp catholic Armed Robbery:   

../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/20190927JusticeMargaretWhiteDismissesPleadingRemovesBCC20050812.png

Since I wanted to sue the BCC, I commenced another action.  

As well as the BCC, the corrupt Qld government, wishing to suppress the evidence, had brought in a new statute permitting civil defendants to bring an action against the plaintiff in an action alleging that the person, plaintiff,  is a "vexatious litigant" and have the action stayed and the plaintiff prohibited from bringing any further action against that defendant.

Just as above, I had sued the trustees of my premises for my benefit, the McVean's as well as the BCC.  The McVeans got in before the BCC. The action commenced by the McVean's came on before Fryberg on the Monday, 7th February, 2006.  He summarily dismissed as ridiculous, the evidence they lead as to a "series of previous vexatious proceedings" alleged against me.

Two days later, on the Wednesday, the 9th February, 2006, the same action against me, but this time by the BCC came on again before Fryberg.  He actually said that the "evidence of the series of previous vexatious proceedings" alleged against me, was the same as on the Monday two days previous.  Yet, he found that the  case was proved for the BCC and his decision is a direct copy of the argument put to him by the corrupt barrister for BCC one John Peden.  Peden had appeared coram Ehrich for John Leslie Morgan, the corrupt Warden of the Anglican St John's College on the campus of The University of Qld.  Clearly the BCC legal practice knew Peden was corrupt.  

[All the full documents, parts of which are displayed here, are already before any Common Law court hearing an action to which these documents are relevant by the Common Law Rule of Law of the Doctrine of Judicial Notice because as Government or court documents they are considered authorative documents such that the information therein MUST be considered by the presiding judge or magistrate, AND do not have to be entered in Evidence by a witness of by any other Rule of Evidence.  Thus a judge or magistrate MUST consider the information there in, even if no party to the trial/hearing wishes the information and document to be considered.Because a judge or magistrate is trained in law including in the Doctrine of Judicial Notice, then if a fact in a pleading, a Claim or Counterclaim, is Common Knowledge, or knowledge sourced in an authoritative document, [including of governments and courts - particularly relevant if a government is committing crimes against subjects or citizens] then that knowledge and document, if applicable, are Judicially Noticed, and that fact or facts are validated. Judicial Notice must be taken, even if not required by any party to the action, and even if a party argues against it.]

The corrupt parasites in the BCC brought this action against me in response to my new action against them.   This new proceeding came on before Fryberg. 
../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/20060209SCQ_FrybergVexatiousLitigantOrder_QSC06-025.png


[All the full documents, parts of which are displayed here, are already before any Common Law court hearing an action to which these documents are relevant by the Common Law Rule of Law of the Doctrine of Judicial Notice because as Government or court documents they are considered authorative documents such that the information therein MUST be considered by the presiding judge or magistrate, AND do not have to be entered in Evidence by a witness of by any other Rule of Evidence.  Thus a judge or magistrate MUST consider the information there in, even if no party to the trial/hearing wishes the information and document to be considered.Because a judge or magistrate is trained in law including in the Doctrine of Judicial Notice, then if a fact in a pleading, a Claim or Counterclaim, is Common Knowledge, or knowledge sourced in an authoritative document, [including of governments and courts - particularly relevant if a government is committing crimes against subjects or citizens] then that knowledge and document, if applicable, are Judicially Noticed, and that fact or facts are validated. Judicial Notice must be taken, even if not required by any party to the action, and even if a party argues against it.]

  
../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/20170426DecisionJacksonVQldGovBCC_GRCCrownLawvMathews01.png
[All the full documents, parts of which are displayed here, are already before any Common Law court hearing an action to which these documents are relevant by the Common Law Rule of Law of the Doctrine of Judicial Notice because as Government or court documents they are considered authorative documents such that the information therein MUST be considered by the presiding judge or magistrate, AND do not have to be entered in Evidence by a witness of by any other Rule of Evidence.  Thus a judge or magistrate MUST consider the information there in, even if no party to the trial/hearing wishes the information and document to be considered.Because a judge or magistrate is trained in law including in the Doctrine of Judicial Notice, then if a fact in a pleading, a Claim or Counterclaim, is Common Knowledge, or knowledge sourced in an authoritative document, [including of governments and courts - particularly relevant if a government is committing crimes against subjects or citizens] then that knowledge and document, if applicable, are Judicially Noticed, and that fact or facts are validated. Judicial Notice must be taken, even if not required by any party to the action, and even if a party argues against it.]

   
../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/20170426DecisionJacksonVQldGovBCC_GRCCrownLawvMathews02.png


[All the full documents, parts of which are displayed here, are already before any Common Law court hearing an action to which these documents are relevant by the Common Law Rule of Law of the Doctrine of Judicial Notice because as Government or court documents they are considered authorative documents such that the information therein MUST be considered by the presiding judge or magistrate, AND do not have to be entered in Evidence by a witness of by any other Rule of Evidence.  Thus a judge or magistrate MUST consider the information there in, even if no party to the trial/hearing wishes the information and document to be considered.Because a judge or magistrate is trained in law including in the Doctrine of Judicial Notice, then if a fact in a pleading, a Claim or Counterclaim, is Common Knowledge, or knowledge sourced in an authoritative document, [including of governments and courts - particularly relevant if a government is committing crimes against subjects or citizens] then that knowledge and document, if applicable, are Judicially Noticed, and that fact or facts are validated. Judicial Notice must be taken, even if not required by any party to the action, and even if a party argues against it.]

   
../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/20171222CA_GottersonMorrisonBondDecisionDismissingMyAppeal_QCA322-Mathews_v_CooperOrs.png

For more Bad Faith/Corruption, I relate how the Qld police ie the Qld Government was involved in the murder attempt on my life on 14 January, 1996 at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia.  I  was left for dead with my face and head stoved in,
my nose broken and driven back through the front third of my sinuses, with every bone throughout and within my head fractured,  and my cribriform plate being displaced through 90 degrees and driven up into my brain.  See: https://HaigReport.com/ass/ /.

The police were there in a flash, called by the ambos when they saw the  extent of my injuries.  The police refused to investigate.  Can you guess how a "coroner" [another corrupt magistrate] would have acted had they been successful and I had been killed?   Those documents I obtained are from the Qld Ambulance service and the Royal Brisbane Hospital, so authorative documents for JUDICIAL NOTICE  purposes for all magistrates purporting to consider these void ab initio charges.

Consider also the corrupt fictional charges of Dangerous Driving against me by the corrupt Qld Director of Prosecutions in 1986 [where and when KJOB was a Crown Prosecutor], when two parasite cops, Laurence Brett Paul and Laurence Sturgess verballed me, PERJURED THEMSELVES.  Both were promoted to rank of Inspector and Paul was seconded to the corrupt catholic clique and cabal CMC.  To win,
I had to appeal it to the Court of Criminal Appeal. [Check above that decision in that page; for reader of the website.]  [For "judicial" recipients of this, for PROOF of availability of JUDICIAL NOTICE, I include an image of the first page of the decision.  You can go and obtain  it all from official sources.
.

http://HaigReport.com/imagesAllTheWorldsAStageOneManInHisTimePlaysManyParts/20190328My1986AppealWinDangerousDriving_0001_tn.jpg



119 Brisbane Road,


-----------------------------------------------------
No Evidence- This is a relatively recent development in the review of administrative action, as the courts are more prepared now than previously to review decisions where the evidence does not appear reasonably capable of supporting the decision made.

Dictation is where the body responsible for making a decision allows itself to be dictated to by some other entity in the community, normally a person superior in status to that body.   Wayne Francis indicated to the eSafety Commissioner that he was directed by the OIC Ipswich Police Station.

The factual instances that support the above include:

The Qld police committed an armed robbery and break and enter of my home at my home at 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia on the 29th and 30th November, and 1st December, 2004.   That information is available on authorative documents so is JUDICIALLY NOTICED by all courts, magistrates and  judges.

A court order was required to enter as they did enter; sec 160 Health Act 1937(Qld). Judges and magistrates are deemed to know the law. They alleged a regulation to the Heath Act 1937 overruled the statute.  This is detailed in the corrupt letter from the corrupt Robert Walker then of the Corrupt catholic Clique and Cabal at Crime & Corruption Commission [then  called the  CMC] and now a Magistrate at Emerald.  That is information on the authorative document of the CMC so is judicially noticed by all courts, and it is not necessary for that information to be introduced by any witness or other "Rule of Evidence". For the benefit of any reader of this website or this communique to Qld courts, judges associates, and court Registrars, I include inline and attached a copy of the authorative document of the CMC as it was a letter to me. [Probably just a link to it on the website of HaigReport when this document appears on my website HaigReport.com/.]


http://HaigReport.com/DocumentaryEvidence/20060410BCCM_CorruptIdiotRobertWalkerCMCapproveBCC_QldPoliceArmedRobbery01_cr01.jpg

http://HaigReport.com/DocumentaryEvidence/20060410BCCM_CorruptIdiotRobertWalkerCMCapproveBCC_QldPoliceArmedRobbery02_cr02.jpg


That was a crime.  Police are supposed to investigate crimes.  I reported those crimes to the Qld police by email so they blocked my email.

When undertaking that armed robbery and break and entry by Qld police in league with the Brisbane City Council [BCC] an authority of the Qld government, corrupt dumb catholic cop Henri Elias [he lies] Rantala arrested me.  That charge of that arrest came on for hearing coram 'egregious' topsy turvy [sentence first verdict afterwards] corrupt catholic [Marist Bros Ashgrove alma mata], magistrate Walter Harvey Ehrich on 1st June, 2005.   I had subpoenaed the mandatory but non-existent "court order", to  show my arrest and  charge was ultra vires and that in fact the  whole episode was the crimes of Armed Robbery and Break and Enter by the Qld government and an authority of the Qld government.   Egregious Ehrich, was shown to be corrupt by the Qld Court of Appeal, when I appealed his decision more than  five years later.  [Yet again, a matter for JUDICIAL NOTICE.]  So  as not to hear the  true evidence, of this series of crimes against me, he, Ehrich sentenced me without any plea or evidence/DEFENCE from me.
[
The PDF version of this Court of Appeal Glorious decision can be accessed online at Evil Egregious Ehrich.]


Menu: We Can't Trust catholics, So WHY Vote for catholics?: