HAIG    REPORT:    GoTo [on this page] HaigReport's Menu Of Themes of Menus for our thousands of pages
TIPS for
Navigating HaigReport:  If you arrived at this page, referred from a Search Engine such as Google et al, your URL link will NOT have an #Anchor/Marker to take you to the relevant spot on this page.  In that case, we do recommend that you view our "Latest HaigReport Promotions" of recent additions to our websites, by Clicking Here.  It will open in a new Browser window. 

If
you Click Here, you will be taken, usually, to the specific Unique Content on this page, for which you were most likely seeking.  However, if you Click Here, you will be taken to the Top of the HaigReport Header, below on this page. 

However, if you have arrived at this page from another of our Website pages, your link will usually have an #Anchor, also called a marker, which will take you to the intended specific spot on the page where that marker is positioned.  In fact, it will probably take you there prior to your reading this.  Moving to that Anchor is the final step in the loading of this page.

 HAIG     REPORT:   Is now on  twitter  [from 2nd June, 2013]  link to us HERE on twitter     See our Twitter Strategy    

 HAIG    REPORT:  SEE: Russell Mathews' COMMENTARY:    Russell Mathews' [BCom BSc LLB & BA] current TOPICAL commentary on GOVERNMENT, politics & business     Press to READ       Press for MENU   

 HAIG    REPORT:    WANTED:
Healthy female "dog" to breed with Parson Russell Terrier, to produce ASSISTANCE DOGS.   Rochedale South QLD 4123
I wish to breed from my Parson Russell Terrier. He is a trained assistance dog. He has a wonderful nature. The breed of his mate could be varied or a cross; eg Parson Russell Terrier, Jack Russell Terrier, Beagle, Bull Terrier, Bull mastiff, Staffy, and/or Fox Terrier plus many others. She does not need to be "pedigreed". I am very protective of my dogs. She will become very valuable to me and become one of my assistance "dogs". If we can assist each other, please contact me on my contact form, including your email address and your landline phone number so I can phone you to discuss. 

Because I am disabled and have an LLB [so therefore understand the Law surrounding disabilities and assistance dogs] I am now branching out to providing Assistance dogs to disabled persons [even if disabled in only a minor way and so not even realizing it]. This is not a business proposition but rather just a very necessary service I can offer to the community.
Many people have a disability and do not realize their ailment or "problem" is by law, the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA], classified as a "disability". This is especially so for people getting on in years, and who have a dog, and are maybe moving to accommodation where they are told they cannot take their dog. In a majority of cases, those people cannot be legally forced to surrender their animal/dog.
I will be assisting those person who already have dogs, but are being forced, unlawfully, to dispose of them because maybe they are moving accommodation. I can train your existing dogs to be assistance dogs and provide the documentation as required by the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) [DDA]. I do not intend to charge for this, but just maybe cover some marginal costs.

 Click here  to Learn how your Personalized Alert Notice [IMMEDIATELY ABOVE] is prepared by our HAIG Unique Visitor Algorithm: [HUVA] or  Click here  to see your UNIQUE Personalized Alert Notice in a new Browser Window.


 Named Corrupt catholic labor Judges CoverUp catholic Armed Robbery:


My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies. The HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE My logo, my TRADEMARK, is the MRI of my skull, showing gross assymetry,aka DEFORMITY = ugliness and target of bullies.

   It is Our legal, social and moral DUTY to EXPOSE CRIME, FRAUD & CORRUPTION plus Lying and Hypocrisy in Public Life, Including Judges & magistrates 
 

Fraud, Corruption & attempted  MURDER 
covered-up by Queensland police, EXPOSED 

DirectoryWebsite/header.php

We Can't Trust catholics, So WHY Vote for catholics?

commonheader.php

Reg. Office: 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.  
Editor-in-Chief:  Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      EMAIL us anytime:  Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay. 

considerevidence.php

Consider the evidence! Please Please make a donation using BPay.  using  Please make a donation using BPay.  

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Named Corrupt catholic labor Judges CoverUp catholic Armed Robbery

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for We Can't Trust catholics, So WHY Vote for catholics?

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  
http://HaigReport.com/includedSeeTodaysHotTopics.php

See: Today's HAIG HOT_TOPICS  => Click HERE <= 

/CodingPHP/includedSeeContentPageFileNameURL.php

  Click here to GoTo Detail:=> Named Corrupt catholic labor Judges CoverUp catholic Armed Robbery

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

See: HaigReport's Menu of Menus of Sites of Related Fraud & Corruption Topics:

 Content: Named Corrupt catholic labor Judges CoverUp catholic Armed Robbery

../Corrupt Police& Magistrates Menu.php An example of a CASCADING Drop Down Menu.

MENU: Rantala-Gate: Corrupt Police & Magistrates Mafia.

CDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.phpCDDM_StartMenu160.php

See: the Menu: for We Can't Trust catholics, So WHY Vote for catholics?

Follow @HaigReport
??   ??   ???? Tweet  
Share on Facebook Share on Facebook  

Named Corrupt catholic labor Judges CoverUp catholic Armed Robbery:

Content: NamedCorruptCatholicLaborJudgesCoverUpCatholicArmedRobbery Supreme court judges  Morrison and Gotterson JA, Bond, Jackson, White, Fryberg JJ and Magistrate Ehrich are all corrupt and Magistrate Robert Walker is a CRIMINAL.  The Senior public servants John Briton and Susan Barker are also criminals.  
 [ All the full documents, parts of which are displayed here, are already before any Common Law court hearing an action to which these documents are relevant by the Common Law Rule of Law of the Doctrine of Judicial Notice because as Government or court documents they are considered authorative documents such that the information therein MUST be considered by the presiding judge or magistrate, AND do not have to be entered in Evidence by a witness of by any other Rule of Evidence.  Thus a judge or magistrate MUST consider the information there in, even if no party to the trial/hearing wishes the information and document to be considered. Content: SynopsisOfJudicialNotice.php InCodingPHP [All the full documents, parts of which are displayed here, are already before any Common Law court hearing an action to which these documents are relevant by the Common Law Rule of Law of the Doctrine of Judicial Notice because as Government or court documents they are considered authorative documents such that the information therein MUST be considered by the presiding judge or magistrate, AND do not have to be entered in Evidence by a witness of by any other Rule of Evidence.  Thus a judge or magistrate MUST consider the information there in, even if no party to the trial/hearing wishes the information and document to be considered.Because a judge or magistrate is trained in law including in the Doctrine of Judicial Notice, then if a fact in a pleading, a Claim or Counterclaim, is Common Knowledge, or knowledge sourced in an authoritative document, [including of governments and courts - particularly relevant if a government is commiting crimes against subjects or citizens] then that knowledge and document, if applicable, are Judicially Noticed, and that fact or facts are validated. Judicial Notice must be taken, even if not required by any party to the action, and even if a party argues against it.]


 
THEY ARE ALL CATHOLICS.  When catholics form only 22.6% of the population [& thankfully decreasing], the FACT that 100% of of the corrupt  judges, magistrates, and public sector parasites, that acted corruptly towards me were catholics, did not happen by chance alone. It is the catholic corruption of its forebears, the catholic croat EUSTACI

On this page I will produce the evidence showing that these six judges of the Supreme Court of Qld, two Qld magistrates [one of which, Robert Walker is a criminal]  are corrupt, and two Senior Qld public Servants are criminal. 

There are other judges and magistrates and public servants for whom I have the evidence of their corruption, but the evidence is so extensive, it will take substantial time to commit to writing.   Rather than make this page too complex, I shall devote another time, HaigReport page and SIGN to each.

The corrupt catholic Qld attorney-general Yvette D'ath, who's married to one of the members of the catholic inspired corrupt  Qld police, has sued me for alleged contempt of court for bringing the court into disrepute, [the corrupt catholic labor judges and catholic government parasites did that themselves by their corruption], for having on one of my signs [photo below] that Judge Morrison  is corrupt.


This was one of my first signs at Booval, on original structure.   It was also illuminated at night, for less that one cent per hour with LED lights.
../imagesCorruptCatholicMafiaOrderOfMaltaMafia/DSCN2726CourtOfAppealAndJudgeMorrisonAreCorruptSign_tn.jpg

I challenge that criminal slut Yvette D'ath to SUE ME for these extra 5 judges and two magistrates when their names are on the signs.  She may wish to combine them into the same proceeding as for Morrison or a new separate one for each so I have more opportunities to produce the evidence of the fraud and corruption of all of them.

The Brisbane City Council and the Qld police, ie the Qld government committed the crimes of Break and Enter, and Armed Robbery of me and my premises at 254 Hawken Dr, St Lucia on 29th November, 2004.

It was a corrupt plan, a RUSE, organized by the corrupt David Askern and the Corrupt Brisbane City Council [BCC].  The corrupt public sector parasites, Robert Walker, John Briton and Susan Barker have quoted the corrupt RUSE, as though it is legitimate, but by Sect 160 of the Health Act 1937, the BCC and the corrupt cop Rantala needed a Court order to enter when they did.

This was part of the corrupt catholics in Qld government responsible for the Roney cATHOLIC ORGANIZED CRIME Fraud of the Commonwealth of Australia.  This was a continuation of "destroying me" because I had the proof of their corruption, and they could not recover it.  They had tried to kill me, but they put me in hospital for 16 days and I survived.  Towards the purpose of destroying me, this action was to make me homeless, and they did, in 2007, for 11 years, and still  they continued trying to destroy me.

Because I have the handwritten admission by one of the catholic fraudsters of an Organized Crime of defrauding  the Commonwealth of Australia, and the names of the fraudsters were known to the Commonwealth of Australia, and the fraudsters could not recover the handwritten [so as good as a signature] admission of the Organized catholic Criminals, they had to "destroy me".  When their efforts [by stealth and government judicial fraud & corruption], did not succeed, they tried to kill me in my home.

CatholicMafiaTriedToKillMe.phpThe reason I publish this matter now is because this corruption directed at me has continued to this date.  This has included an assassination attempt of myself.  [Follow the following hyperlinks to view the original documentary evidence of the ambos and the  treating doctors, x-ray reports and reports of nurses who  first saw me, and the discharge documents.]  I am lucky to be alive as the parasites tried to kill me, with the knowledge and involvement of Qld police who refused to investigate.   That attack in my home, on Sunday Night, the 14th January, 1996, put me in hospital for 16 days with every bone in my head fractured, with my nose broken and driven back through the front third of my sinuses and my cribriform plate displaced through 90degrees and driven up into my brain.]  I had been repeatedly kicked on the head, aiming at my nose, the weakest part of my skull, after I had been knocked to the floor.  When "One Punch can Kill", it is clear that it was intended that I die and so be silenced.  That begs the question as to the identity of the person or persons that contracted  for my assassination to silence me. 
The efforts to destroy me began with their trying to give me a criminal record, firstly for bogus "Dangerous Driving" plus:  read on.

On 21st April, 2012, I prepared a timeline of events to that time.

It soon became obvious that the courts wished to suppress the evidence of the crimes and fraud by the Brisbane City Council and the Qld government. This was, when the charge of me by parasite corrupt catholic cop Henri Elias Rantala when he did his break and enter and armed robbery first came before the court; corrupt catholic [graduate of Marist Bros Ashgrove] Walter Harvey Ehrich on 1st June, 2005Without hearing from me or hearing my witnesses, he convicted me, AFTER HE HAD SENTENCED ME.  I won that case in the Court of Appeal on 20 July 2010.

See what the Court of Appeal had to say about the way I was/am still being treated by this corrupt governmentIt may be quoting WHAT I WROTE, BUT THEY DID NOT NEED TO INCLUDE THAT IN THEIR DECISION.

I made complaint to the police re the Break and Enter & Armed Robbery.  Not only did they ignore me, but they blocked my email so I could not complain to them.  [I did not expect that they would investigate.  They refused to investigate the attempted murder of myself in January 1996.

So, I took a civil action in the supreme court for trespass, assault, malicious damage, stealing and theft.  Because both the Brisbane City Council [BCC] and the Qld government committed the CRIMES of Break & Enter and Armed Robbery, I could sue either the BCC or the Qld Government.   Because the BCC devised the RUSE, and were the "lead criminals", I sued the BCC.

Just as Ehrich had convicted me and so concluded the hearing without hearing the evidence of the crimes of break and enter and Armed Robbery, for the sole reason of suppressing the evidence of the government crimes, the corrupt judge Margaret White REMOVED BCC  as a defendant, so I could not lead evidence about the armed robbery.  See the last two lines of ORDER 1, below.

One can understand the extent of her corruption.   She struck out the pleadings.  In re-pleadings, anything could be pleaded, and the parties could be amended.   Because she had struck out the pleadings, she had absolutely no basis on which to remove BCC as a defendant, because there was nothing before the court.  She cannot use the struck out pleadings, as once struck out, they are a NULLITY; they are nothing, zilch; they do not exist.  She could not know what could be repleaded.  It could be amended.

I did not replead but commenced another action Content: SynopsisOfJudicialNotice.php InCodingPHP [All the full documents, parts of which are displayed here, are already before any Common Law court hearing an action to which these documents are relevant by the Common Law Rule of Law of the Doctrine of Judicial Notice because as Government or court documents they are considered authorative documents such that the information therein MUST be considered by the presiding judge or magistrate, AND do not have to be entered in Evidence by a witness of by any other Rule of Evidence.  Thus a judge or magistrate MUST consider the information there in, even if no party to the trial/hearing wishes the information and document to be considered.Because a judge or magistrate is trained in law including in the Doctrine of Judicial Notice, then if a fact in a pleading, a Claim or Counterclaim, is Common Knowledge, or knowledge sourced in an authoritative document, [including of governments and courts - particularly relevant if a government is commiting crimes against subjects or citizens] then that knowledge and document, if applicable, are Judicially Noticed, and that fact or facts are validated. Judicial Notice must be taken, even if not required by any party to the action, and even if a party argues against it.]

.  

../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/20190927JusticeMargaretWhiteDismissesPleadingRemovesBCC20050812.png

Since I wanted to sue the BCC, I commenced another action.  

As well as the BCC, the corrupt Qld government, wishing to suppress the evidence, had brought in a new statute permitting civil defendants to bring an action against the plaintiff in an action alleging that the person, plaintiff,  is a "vexatious litigant" and have the action stayed and the plaintiff prohibited from bringing any further action against that defendant.

Just as above, I had sued the trustees of my premises for my benefit, the McVean's as well as the BCC.  The McVeans got in before the BCC. The action commenced by the McVean's came on before Fryberg on the Monday, 7th February, 2006.  He summarily dismissed as ridiculous, the evidence they lead as to a "series of previous vexatious proceedings" alleged against me.

Two days later, on the Wednesday, the 9th February, 2006, the same action against me, but this time by the BCC came on again before Fryberg.  He actually said that the "evidence of the series of previous vexatious proceedings" alleged against me, was the same as on the Monday two days previous.  Yet, he found that the  case was proved for the BCC and his decision is a direct copy of the argument put to him by the corrupt barrister for BCC one John Peden.  Peden had appeared coram Ehrich for John Leslie Morgan, the corrupt Warden of the Anglican St John's College on the campus of The University of Qld.  Clearly the BCC legal practice knew Peden was corrupt.  

Content: SynopsisOfJudicialNotice.php InCodingPHP [All the full documents, parts of which are displayed here, are already before any Common Law court hearing an action to which these documents are relevant by the Common Law Rule of Law of the Doctrine of Judicial Notice because as Government or court documents they are considered authorative documents such that the information therein MUST be considered by the presiding judge or magistrate, AND do not have to be entered in Evidence by a witness of by any other Rule of Evidence.  Thus a judge or magistrate MUST consider the information there in, even if no party to the trial/hearing wishes the information and document to be considered.Because a judge or magistrate is trained in law including in the Doctrine of Judicial Notice, then if a fact in a pleading, a Claim or Counterclaim, is Common Knowledge, or knowledge sourced in an authoritative document, [including of governments and courts - particularly relevant if a government is commiting crimes against subjects or citizens] then that knowledge and document, if applicable, are Judicially Noticed, and that fact or facts are validated. Judicial Notice must be taken, even if not required by any party to the action, and even if a party argues against it.]

The corrupt parasites in the BCC brought this action against me in response to my new action against them.   This new proceeding came on before Fryberg. 
../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/20060209SCQ_FrybergVexatiousLitigantOrder_QSC06-025.png


Content: SynopsisOfJudicialNotice.php InCodingPHP [All the full documents, parts of which are displayed here, are already before any Common Law court hearing an action to which these documents are relevant by the Common Law Rule of Law of the Doctrine of Judicial Notice because as Government or court documents they are considered authorative documents such that the information therein MUST be considered by the presiding judge or magistrate, AND do not have to be entered in Evidence by a witness of by any other Rule of Evidence.  Thus a judge or magistrate MUST consider the information there in, even if no party to the trial/hearing wishes the information and document to be considered.Because a judge or magistrate is trained in law including in the Doctrine of Judicial Notice, then if a fact in a pleading, a Claim or Counterclaim, is Common Knowledge, or knowledge sourced in an authoritative document, [including of governments and courts - particularly relevant if a government is commiting crimes against subjects or citizens] then that knowledge and document, if applicable, are Judicially Noticed, and that fact or facts are validated. Judicial Notice must be taken, even if not required by any party to the action, and even if a party argues against it.]

  
../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/20170426DecisionJacksonVQldGovBCC_GRCCrownLawvMathews01.png
Content: SynopsisOfJudicialNotice.php InCodingPHP [All the full documents, parts of which are displayed here, are already before any Common Law court hearing an action to which these documents are relevant by the Common Law Rule of Law of the Doctrine of Judicial Notice because as Government or court documents they are considered authorative documents such that the information therein MUST be considered by the presiding judge or magistrate, AND do not have to be entered in Evidence by a witness of by any other Rule of Evidence.  Thus a judge or magistrate MUST consider the information there in, even if no party to the trial/hearing wishes the information and document to be considered.Because a judge or magistrate is trained in law including in the Doctrine of Judicial Notice, then if a fact in a pleading, a Claim or Counterclaim, is Common Knowledge, or knowledge sourced in an authoritative document, [including of governments and courts - particularly relevant if a government is commiting crimes against subjects or citizens] then that knowledge and document, if applicable, are Judicially Noticed, and that fact or facts are validated. Judicial Notice must be taken, even if not required by any party to the action, and even if a party argues against it.]

   
../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/20170426DecisionJacksonVQldGovBCC_GRCCrownLawvMathews02.png


Content: SynopsisOfJudicialNotice.php InCodingPHP [All the full documents, parts of which are displayed here, are already before any Common Law court hearing an action to which these documents are relevant by the Common Law Rule of Law of the Doctrine of Judicial Notice because as Government or court documents they are considered authorative documents such that the information therein MUST be considered by the presiding judge or magistrate, AND do not have to be entered in Evidence by a witness of by any other Rule of Evidence.  Thus a judge or magistrate MUST consider the information there in, even if no party to the trial/hearing wishes the information and document to be considered.Because a judge or magistrate is trained in law including in the Doctrine of Judicial Notice, then if a fact in a pleading, a Claim or Counterclaim, is Common Knowledge, or knowledge sourced in an authoritative document, [including of governments and courts - particularly relevant if a government is commiting crimes against subjects or citizens] then that knowledge and document, if applicable, are Judicially Noticed, and that fact or facts are validated. Judicial Notice must be taken, even if not required by any party to the action, and even if a party argues against it.]

   
../imagesWeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/20171222CA_GottersonMorrisonBondDecisionDismissingMyAppeal_QCA322-Mathews_v_CooperOrs.png
Ehrich
Robert Walker
JohnBriton
SusanBarker

Ehrich

Robert Walker

You will notice that this criminal restates the bogus "legal advice" provided by the barrister Waynker Wayne Tolton that a regulation can over-ride a right in a stature.   The Qld's catholic Attorney-General Yvette D'ath, married to member of the corrupt Qld police, knew this when she appointed him as a magistrate.  One wonders if that promotion was a reward for this legal crap below Content: SynopsisOfJudicialNotice.php InCodingPHP [All the full documents, parts of which are displayed here, are already before any Common Law court hearing an action to which these documents are relevant by the Common Law Rule of Law of the Doctrine of Judicial Notice because as Government or court documents they are considered authorative documents such that the information therein MUST be considered by the presiding judge or magistrate, AND do not have to be entered in Evidence by a witness of by any other Rule of Evidence.  Thus a judge or magistrate MUST consider the information there in, even if no party to the trial/hearing wishes the information and document to be considered.Because a judge or magistrate is trained in law including in the Doctrine of Judicial Notice, then if a fact in a pleading, a Claim or Counterclaim, is Common Knowledge, or knowledge sourced in an authoritative document, [including of governments and courts - particularly relevant if a government is commiting crimes against subjects or citizens] then that knowledge and document, if applicable, are Judicially Noticed, and that fact or facts are validated. Judicial Notice must be taken, even if not required by any party to the action, and even if a party argues against it.]

.  
http://HaigReport.com/DocumentaryEvidence/20060410BCCM_CorruptIdiotRobertWalkerCMCapproveBCC_QldPoliceArmedRobbery01_cr01.jpg

http://HaigReport.com/DocumentaryEvidence/20060410BCCM_CorruptIdiotRobertWalkerCMCapproveBCC_QldPoliceArmedRobbery02_cr02.jpg



John Briton

John Briton is also criminal with the same legal crap Content: SynopsisOfJudicialNotice.php InCodingPHP [All the full documents, parts of which are displayed here, are already before any Common Law court hearing an action to which these documents are relevant by the Common Law Rule of Law of the Doctrine of Judicial Notice because as Government or court documents they are considered authorative documents such that the information therein MUST be considered by the presiding judge or magistrate, AND do not have to be entered in Evidence by a witness of by any other Rule of Evidence.  Thus a judge or magistrate MUST consider the information there in, even if no party to the trial/hearing wishes the information and document to be considered.Because a judge or magistrate is trained in law including in the Doctrine of Judicial Notice, then if a fact in a pleading, a Claim or Counterclaim, is Common Knowledge, or knowledge sourced in an authoritative document, [including of governments and courts - particularly relevant if a government is commiting crimes against subjects or citizens] then that knowledge and document, if applicable, are Judicially Noticed, and that fact or facts are validated. Judicial Notice must be taken, even if not required by any party to the action, and even if a party argues against it.]

.   
../imagesMyReports/20051108LSCJohnBritonLegalServicesComissionerApproveBCC_QldPoliceArmedRobbery01Cr01.jpg
Content: SynopsisOfJudicialNotice.php InCodingPHP [All the full documents, parts of which are displayed here, are already before any Common Law court hearing an action to which these documents are relevant by the Common Law Rule of Law of the Doctrine of Judicial Notice because as Government or court documents they are considered authorative documents such that the information therein MUST be considered by the presiding judge or magistrate, AND do not have to be entered in Evidence by a witness of by any other Rule of Evidence.  Thus a judge or magistrate MUST consider the information there in, even if no party to the trial/hearing wishes the information and document to be considered.Because a judge or magistrate is trained in law including in the Doctrine of Judicial Notice, then if a fact in a pleading, a Claim or Counterclaim, is Common Knowledge, or knowledge sourced in an authoritative document, [including of governments and courts - particularly relevant if a government is commiting crimes against subjects or citizens] then that knowledge and document, if applicable, are Judicially Noticed, and that fact or facts are validated. Judicial Notice must be taken, even if not required by any party to the action, and even if a party argues against it.]


../imagesMyReports/20051108LSCJohnBritonLegalServicesComissionerApproveBCC_QldPoliceArmedRobbery02Cr01.jpg


Susan Barker

Susan  Barker is also criminal with the same legal crap Content: SynopsisOfJudicialNotice.php InCodingPHP [All the full documents, parts of which are displayed here, are already before any Common Law court hearing an action to which these documents are relevant by the Common Law Rule of Law of the Doctrine of Judicial Notice because as Government or court documents they are considered authorative documents such that the information therein MUST be considered by the presiding judge or magistrate, AND do not have to be entered in Evidence by a witness of by any other Rule of Evidence.  Thus a judge or magistrate MUST consider the information there in, even if no party to the trial/hearing wishes the information and document to be considered.Because a judge or magistrate is trained in law including in the Doctrine of Judicial Notice, then if a fact in a pleading, a Claim or Counterclaim, is Common Knowledge, or knowledge sourced in an authoritative document, [including of governments and courts - particularly relevant if a government is commiting crimes against subjects or citizens] then that knowledge and document, if applicable, are Judicially Noticed, and that fact or facts are validated. Judicial Notice must be taken, even if not required by any party to the action, and even if a party argues against it.]

.  If you wish you may click on the image below to be take to her full bogus report.   
../imagesMyReports/page9reInfoCommapproveBCCtrespass.jpg

Content: SynopsisOfJudicialNotice.php InCodingPHP [All the full documents, parts of which are displayed here, are already before any Common Law court hearing an action to which these documents are relevant by the Common Law Rule of Law of the Doctrine of Judicial Notice because as Government or court documents they are considered authorative documents such that the information therein MUST be considered by the presiding judge or magistrate, AND do not have to be entered in Evidence by a witness of by any other Rule of Evidence.  Thus a judge or magistrate MUST consider the information there in, even if no party to the trial/hearing wishes the information and document to be considered.Because a judge or magistrate is trained in law including in the Doctrine of Judicial Notice, then if a fact in a pleading, a Claim or Counterclaim, is Common Knowledge, or knowledge sourced in an authoritative document, [including of governments and courts - particularly relevant if a government is commiting crimes against subjects or citizens] then that knowledge and document, if applicable, are Judicially Noticed, and that fact or facts are validated. Judicial Notice must be taken, even if not required by any party to the action, and even if a party argues against it.]




PeterRoneyQCHandwrittenAdmissionMultipleCriminalFraud This here BELOW, next photo [after that of Frigid Brigid "Eeney" Meney] of the little criminal prick, is a photo of the little catholic mafia criminal prick named Peter John Roney.  He, together with five others of the catholic mafia organized crime, defrauded the Commonwealth of Australia, and The University of Qld, with "bullshit" as admitted by Peter Roney in his handwritten admission of FRAUD.   Below his handwritten admission of FRAUD,  I name two individuals for whom circumstantial evidence suggest are the doctor who wrote the bogus medical certificate and the individual who was the architect of the massive fraud of the Commonwealth of Australia and the signatory to one of the Stat Decs.

The catholics have a predilection to having a preponderance of lawyers, no doubt to assist them in their criminal cultural pursuit "to take over the world" by any means including criminal. Since Roney was wanting to do law, the catholic mafia and no doubt the "good" catholics in the Order of Malta Mafia were ready to defraud the Commonwealth, with  the goal "to take over the world".  The catholics see the LAW and COURTS, the JUDICIAL system, IS THE WAY TO CONTROL THE WORLD, so they can TAKE OVER THE WORLD.
TakeOverTheWorldFrigidBrigidEeneyMeney.php
../imagesCorruptCatholicMafiaOrderOfMaltaMafia/20200514ImageBrigidMeneyPractisingCatholicRaisedYoGoOutAndTakeOverTheWorld.jpg../imagesCorruptCatholicMafiaOrderOfMaltaMafia/20200515PhotoPorkyFrigidBrigidMeney.jpg

Porky Piggy Frigid Brigid 'Eeney' Meney [Miney Moe catch a Porky/Piggy by the toe] [you can see she is very porky and those photos are not photo-shopped] connects being catholic to "taking over the world.  That is the reasons that catholics have had their own schools for centuries, even before they conned [they ensured that they were the decision making "elected reps"] us taxpayers to pay for their indoctrinating their parasitic mafia kids into wanting to "take over the world".  They try to employ only catholics so all or almost all of that taxpayers' money goes to catholics.

She is one of nine kids.  Her father is Chris Meney, Chancellor of the catholic Archdiocese of Sydney.   [Chris Meney, Chancellor of the catholic Archdiocese of Sydney gave a character reference for George Pell AFTER his conviction.  Don't forget George Pell knew much about the criminal paedophile priests and was involved in their transfer to "virgin territories". so those "kiddie fiddlers" could renew their crimes and refresh their thrills.  Remember the evidence against George Pell.   Consider:  How many catholics are on the High Court?  If catholics on the High Court or anywhere in the judiciary or government are offended by that REALITY, then why have they not exposed the catholic mafia parasitic corruption of catholics schools raising catholics to "take over the world".]


My fight is not really with this dumb little prick PETER RONEY, but with the CATHOLIC MAFIA ORGANIZED CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION that defrauded the Commonwealth of Australia to regain for Roney, Commonwealth of Australia Government funding, to which HE WAS NOT ENTITLED.   What is worse, is that because I had this handwritten admission of fraud written by Roney, criminal catholic mafia of judges and public sector parasites set out to destroy me and my life and business, TO PROTECT AT LEAST FOUR CATHOLIC MAFIA CRIMINAL PARASITES, WHOSE NAMES WERE KNOWN TO GOVERNMENT AND THE UNIVERSITY OF QLD.  TWO  were/ARE doctors, one being a "specialist" psychiatrist.   Does the  reader believe that this was an isolated case? 

I am in this for the long haul.  The catholic parasites tried to kill me.  The corrupt police refused to investigate.   They tried to silence me because I had Roney's hand written [as good as a signature] admission of his involvement in ORGANIZED CRIME - ORGANIZED catholic CRIMERoney has written to Google, complaining that I am defaming him [,but he dares not sue me as all the evidence will be produced in court and none of the corrupt catholic parasites want that], and asking that all pages on HaigReport.com that contain that hand written [as good as a signature] admission of his involvement in ORGANIZED CRIME - ORGANIZED catholic CRIME be removed from their search results.   So, I will be  adding  THIS PHP INCLUDED SEGMENT to so many more of  the HaigReport.com pages so RONEY will be kept busy writing to Google.

Content: EvidenceQldCatholicMafiaPeterHenneken Hear now the incontrovertible evidence of the CRIMINAL catholic MAFIA in the Qld government.  This is from an Interview of Peter Henneken 'AM' on the 8th June, 2010.  Clearly, Peter Henneken is himself a catholic mafia. All catholics are catholic mafia.  This is the first 9 minutes of a 91 minute interview of the catholic Senior Qld Public Servant Peter Henneken. He is not particularly intelligent.  Post his completing Senior Public Exam, he spent two and a half years in a catholic seminary. He later studied at QIT [prior to its becoming QUT], presumably because his matriculation was insufficient to gain entry to The University of Qld [UQ].   .   .  Peter Henneken repeatedly speaks of the catholic mafia corruption bias as "tradition".  That indicates that it has been corrupt like that since well before the date he mentions of 31 July, 1969, That catholic mafia giving preference to catholics for employment in the Qld public sector, paid with taxpayer funds, IS CORRUPTION. Henneken seems not to realize that.  It seems in his mind that that is perfectly okay. That interview was recorded in 2010.   Nothing has happened during that time nor since that has removed that corruption.  I am in the process of exposing that corruption.  The criminal catholic mafia is doing what it can criminally to silence me.  See the corrupt  Det. Sgt Waynker Wayne Francis.


He has even tried to "bullshit" Google with a veiled threat.  Even though Google had all the evidence it needed to know that this evidence is the truth, it has allowed itself to be kowtowed by this little catholic mafia criminal prick. By Google's kowtowing to Roney, they have supported the catholic mafia organized crime DEFRAUDING THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, A SOVEREIGN  NATION.    [I have many pages of Google search results, where Google notes at the end of the page of search results that it has removed some pages, and then links to the relevant Lumen-Google complaint; this one. The reader can see for him/herself by doing one of the searches, the subject of the Roney veiled threat to Google, on Google]
../imagesOriginGovernmentCorruption/20180416RoneyPhotoPeterJohnRoneyQC04Cr01.jpg

Peter Roney [now QC] wrote the below passage in a letter to me dated 19/2/1989.  I explain the circumstances of his writing this elsewhere.
http://HaigReport.com/imagesOriginGovernmentCorruption/PeterRoneyFraudAdmissionReDoctorPsychiatristTwoStatDecsJobRE_Cr01_tn_800x357.jpg


I repeat the whole text of this excerpt to ensure that Google et al do index it readily, [and to permit me to include Anchors/Markers at particular words]:

"... The job I lost at the RE was suddenly given back.  I've appealed against 'my TEAS decision on the basis that a week before my exams Sue & I broke up as a result of a letter she sent me. She did in fact send it to me, but it was only 2 weeks ago [this admission by Roney was written 19th February, 1979] and upon my request. I have statutory decs. from 2 people "who knew of my circumstances," a medical certificate & a letter from a Psychiatrist (no less) which all say I was incapable of sitting for the exams I failed, & its all bullshit.
 "This is obviously where contacts are important. ..." 


This is a case of '[catholic/vatican] INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZED CRIME'   


Strong circumstantial evidence points to Dr Ian William Anthony Marshall [IWAM] as being the criminal author of the fraudulent Medical Certificate.  Even much stronger circumstantial evidence indicates that the "architect" of the conspiracy to Defraud and author of one of the TWO bogus Stat Decs, was the then, in 1979, Crown Prosecutor and in 2019 the Chief District Court Judge Kerry John O'Brien [KJOB].



This page, in the 'We Can't Trust catholics, So WHY Vote for catholics?' website, within HaigReport, at the URL of http://HaigReport.com/WeCantTrustCatholicsSoDontVoteForCatholics/ is still under construction.  Google just loves seeing pages repeatedly updated, and gives higher rankings accordingly. Hence, we do not wait until a page is complete before publishing it, and then, as we continually add to it,Google et al continuously indexes it and ranks it more highly. If you have any queries or suggestions, please email me on our
PHP Contact Form.




Menu: We Can't Trust catholics, So WHY Vote for catholics?: