Australian CORRUPTION EXPOSED

OPEN LETTER [20061212] to Judy Magub, Councillor in Brisbane City Council [BCC] for the Ward/Electorate of my HOME.

Tuesday, 12 December, 2006.   


Judy Magub,
Councillor,
Toowong Ward,
Brisbane City Council [BCC].


Dear Ms Magub,

I have sent you an ALERT EMAIL,  alerting you to this OPEN LETTER.  [It has also been sent to many Qld MLAs and reps of the Liberal Party of Australia as well.]  

I wish to see your actions in response to my alerting you to the ILLEGAL invasion of my home by BCC  and the theft of much of my property. 

THIS LETTER IS TO YOU AND I EXPECT A REPLY from you, AND ACTION by you, TO REDRESS THE WRONG DONE TO ME BY BCC.

One of the benefits to me of this method of communication is that I do not need to rewrite so much.  My complaint is contained on the page of this site and you need only click on this highlighted hyperlink to see it and for me to have made my complaint to you.  Done.

I am FULLY TRAINED as a LAWYER.  I have an LLB, and am studying more law, at a higher level of law, within my PhD studies. That makes me an expert in law.  I have explained the relevant law on that page and pages linked to it.  All of those pages are included as part of this OPEN LETTER to you. 

What the BCC did was ILLEGAL  and CRIMINAL.  As this was action by the BCC and you are my ELECTED representative on the BCC, it is properly your province to act.  I trust you will properly resolve this matter.  [That means having the BCC personnel charged for the CRIMES and my being fully compensated by BCC for my losses and for the invasion of my rights.]  If you do that, properly resolve the matter, and were I to say otherwise on this site, [I wouldn't], you would be able to sue me.

You do not have the legal ability to be able to consider the legality of this matter.  You would be unwise to accept the legal reasoning of anyone with a lesser legal ability than I.   I challenge you to obtain the written [so they cannot later deny what you say they said], consideration by a person with equal or greater legal qualifications and knowledge than I, of the legal case against BCC and its personnel, as stated by me on these pages to whIch I have already referred you.  You have to act on the legal case as stated by me, unless and until, you have another "legal opinion" [that would have to be in writing if you wish to protect yourself, and THE LIBERAL PARTY,  as I will explain later].  You should refer your choice of legal expert [if you prefer not to accept my legal opinion, as an expert] to my legal reasoning on this site and in this your OPEN LETTER.  

  This, my Site Haigreport.com now has a google ranking such that I  [HAIGREPORT] have/has  a #1 spot of "about 952,000" sites on a google search of www with the WORDS [no ""], <Australian corruption exposed>.  You try it!! [and have a look at whom it beats.] They are such general words which means that google has applied a big value to my site for the ranking parameter it determines, and that ranking is improving all the time.  [I have seen my site going up the list.   I am continually adding content to my site.]   Maybe I am doing something right??   The Absolute Google Ranking Parameter [AGRP] which Google has obviously applied to my site, is therefore so enormously high. 

I have just done a google search of <Judy  Magub> and there were only 663 domain names returned.  Wouldn't it be interesting if at the next BCC election [or when the Liberal Party determines pre-selection], anyone who did a google search for Judy Magub,  found the #1 spot directed them to Haigreport.com/?  I am sure to have a page about you  published soon.  It, that page, will direct people to this OPEN LETTER too.

This site has existed since only 23 August, 2006.  I wanted to publish the page targeting Lavarch before the then looming state election.  That page was published 25 August, 2006.  We also letterboxed her electorate.   I think I had not allowed enough time before the state election, but Lavarch is now effective gone as we desired.  I wonder if this site played a part.  Of couse, this site did not then have the large AGRP that it obviously now has.

Since you are a LIBERAL PARTY representative, that has to suggest that the LIBERAL PARTY has something to do with you and to some extent "vouches" for you, or otherwise, what is the use, for electors, of having a party "behind you".   I suspect that you may not act as you should, so I will hold the LIBERAL PARTY ACCOUNTABLE for your actions or inactions.   That is the reason that I am emailing the LIBERAL PARTY.   I suspect that you will not stand again for the Ward of Toowong for the BCC elections.  [Just guessing, eh?]  In that eventuality, the next Liberal Candidate will be tarred with the feathers of your (in)actions. 


Kind regards,
********************************************************************
Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA     
ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of
       The UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND

254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia Q4067.
Skype: russellmathews

Ph: NONE:  I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email or Skype me.]

HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE


International students BEWARE of Australian universities
The /"_Judges are Corrupt_"/ [WorldWide] Network.[members' links]
*******************************************************************


There is much CORRUPTION in Australia but the majority of it is concealed. THIS HAS MAJOR CONSEQUENCES FOR AUSTRALIA POLICICALLY ON the WORLD STAGE. Australia attempts to pontificate from the HIGH MORAL GROUND and be the BULLY OF THE PACIFIC”. America [USA – Bush] is attempting to diminish its INTERNATIONAL crimes by seeming to associate with a densizen of the “high moral ground” [Australia], whereas in fact, AUSTRALIA IS RIFE WITH CORRUPTION. The hidden corruption is spread across layers of government, [elected and “public service”], POLICE, [Queensland and Federal], the judiciary, legal profession, EDUCATION, UNIVERSITIES and business. It occurs in many dimensions. Much of the corruption is for the “cover-up” of incompetence, and other corruption. Some members of my “family” have gained some “inspiration” from some of this corruption, utilising corruption in the legal profession and judiciary.          
The www is the ideal medium to present The EVIDENCE of this corruption when that evidence is documented and the statements of others where those statements are public records. I WILL PUBLISH THE FACTUAL EVIDENCE HERE. My purpose with this site is to assemble that evidence and the logical linkage for the UNCHALLENGABLE CONCLUSION. I have special skills in this respect. I am first and foremost a MATHEMATICIAN with maths majors in my BSc and BA. As well, I am fully trained to be admitted as a lawyer. I have practical experience in many courts over many years and as an accountant and tax agent.



Quick Access

Who is "HAIG"?
HAIG concerns:
 Contents/Sitemap
    SEARCH this site
Opt-In Emails/ SIGN UP.
Contact HAIG

The "Judges are Corrupt" [WorldWide] Network
Tertiary Education in Australia
Recycling to save the Earth Water stupidity in Australia.
English as a Second Language for Chinese.
Interests for Chinese People
Coaching/Consulting







Section 10: Act done because of disability and for other reason

If:

(a) an act is done for 2 or more reasons; and

(b) one of the reasons is the disability of a person (whether or not

it is the dominant or a substantial reason for doing the act);

then, for the purposes of this Act, the act is taken to be done for

that reason.


There is much CORRUPTION in Australia but the majority of it is concealed. THIS HAS MAJOR CONSEQUENCES FOR AUSTRALIA POLICICALLY ON the WORLD STAGE. Australia attempts to pontificate from the HIGH MORAL GROUND and be the BULLY OF THE PACIFIC”. America [USA – Bush] is attempting to diminish its INTERNATIONAL crimes by seeming to associate with a densizen of the “high moral ground” [Australia], whereas in fact, AUSTRALIA IS RIFE WITH CORRUPTION. The hidden corruption is spread across layers of government, [elected and “public service”],

Section 10: Act done because of disability and for other reason

If:

(a) an act is done for 2 or more reasons; and

(b) one of the reasons is the disability of a person (whether or not

it is the dominant or a substantial reason for doing the act);

then, for the purposes of this Act, the act is taken to be done for

Section 10: Act done because of disability and for other reason
If:
(a) an act is done for 2 or more reasons; and
(b) one of the reasons is the disability of a person (whether or not it is the dominant or a substantial reason for doing the act); then, for the purposes of this Act, the act is taken to be done for that reason.
      

Section 10: Act done because of disability and for other reason
If:
(a) an act is done for 2 or more reasons; and
(b) one of the reasons is the disability of a person (whether or not it is the dominant or a substantial reason for doing the act); then, for the purposes of this Act, the act is taken to be done for that reason.

THE FACTUAL EVIDENCE HERE. My purpose with this site is to assemble that evidence and the logical linkage for the UNCHALLENGABLE CONCLUSION.

Section 10: Act done because of disability and for other reason
If:
(a) an act is done for 2 or more reasons; and (b) one of the reasons is the disability of a person (whether or not it is the dominant or a substantial reason for doing the act); then, for the purposes of this Act, the act is taken to be done for that reason.
      

Section 10: Act done because of disability and for other reason
If:
(a) an act is done for 2 or more reasons; and
(b) one of the reasons is the disability of a person (whether or not it is the dominant or a substantial reason for doing the act); then, for the purposes of this Act, the act is taken to be done for that reason.





a

a

Section 10: Act done because of disability and for other reason
If:
(a) an act is done for 2 or more reasons; and
(b) one of the reasons is the disability of a person (whether or not it is the dominant or a substantial reason for doing the act); then, for the purposes of this Act, the act is taken to be done for that reason.
      


a
a

Section 10: Act done because of disability and for other reason

If:

(a) an act is done for 2 or more reasons; and

(b) one of the reasons is the disability of a person (whether or not

it is the dominant or a substantial reason for doing the act);

then, for the purposes of this Act, the act is taken to be done for

that reason.


a
a
a
a
a

Section 10: Act done because of disability and for other reason

If:

(a) an act is done for 2 or more reasons; and

(b) one of the reasons is the disability of a person (whether or not

it is the dominant or a substantial reason for doing the act);

then, for the purposes of this Act, the act is taken to be done for

that reason.



a

































































CORRUPTION EXPOSED










fffffff







ggggg









hhhhh










eeeeeee