The HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE

Australian CORRUPTION EXPOSED

FRAUD of UNIVERSITY of QUEENSLAND [UQ] Students:

CLASS ACTION: Multi-Million dollar FRAUD by The University of Queensland

Millions of Dollars [$x,000,000] CLAIMS LIABILITY
from UQ and
The Anglican Church of Australia.



Due to FRAUD by St John's College [SJC]
 
on the St Lucia Campus [SLC] of
 
The University of Queensland [UQ]


Authored by: Russell G H Mathews LLB.

All "residents" of SJC, who have been conned and then required to reside "off-campus" in  the "Anglican's Rabbit Warren" [ARW], most likely have a damages claim againt BOTH UQ and BDAC, for not only the accommodation charge they paid to be a resident of SJC, but also for damages for any losses that relocation of them by SJC caused. This would be an appropriate instance for a CLASS ACTION.  Additionally, any inferior performance in any UQ exams or assessments could be laid at the feet of  SJC.  The total of just the refunds of College fees for the time "residents" were forced to stay at ARW, would amount to millions of dollars.  In addition, the additional aggravated and exemplary damages caused by their being forced to stay at the ARW, could amount to many millions more.  The health problems and concerns caused by the fact that the ARW is an ASBESTOS RIDDEN HOVEL, could more than double that again.  



SJC is a joint venture between UQ and the Brisbane Diocese of the Anglican Church of Australia [BDAC].   SJC is not an entity or corporate body.   The terms of the Joint Venture [JV], are not expressed in any one place. Any JV is a contract.   There is no single contractural document for SJC on SLC of UQ.  The terms are determined by collecting the sum total of the instances of interaction and interrelation and agreement of UQ and BDAC, relative to SJC, with the remainder provided by the tennents of PARTNERSHIP LAW.  As this matter involves land, the contracts have to be substantially in writing, or witnessed in writing.  The primary document detailing any terms of their contract is the Nomination of Trustees [NT] and Schedule of Trusts [ST], by which BDAC holds the land on SLC of UQ, on which is situated SJC, in trust for the purpose of supplying accommodation for students of UQ.   All the terms in the ST are most restrictive of BDAC. BDAC can do very little without the approval of UQ Senate [UQS].  With SJC not being an entity, both joint venturers are liable, jointly and severally, for the total damages of any untoward actions by SJC.  The two JVers are not of equal position and power.   The affairs of the SJC are administered by the Council of SJC [CSJC].  There is one representative of UQ Senate [UQS] on the CSJC.  UQS has the ultimate absolute power.   Morgan has his first allegiances to the BDAC.  He is a priest of the BDAC.  If substantial decisions have to be made, such as amendment to the constitution of SJC, first they have to be approved by BDAC and then by UQS. 



The ARW was purchased by BDAC, one of the two JVBers.  The "tenant" of ARW is SJC.  SJC is NOT an entity.  Therefore, both joint venturers are the tenant of SJC, but, that means UQ, is a tenant with the owner in sharing a house which they sublet to people [students] who applied for residence on campus at SJC. In fact, because of joint and several liability, and SJC is a JV, the ARW is actually a CONTRIBUTION TO THE JV BY BDAC,  and if there is no document showing to the contrary, both JVs, UQ and BDAC JOINTLY OWN the ARW BENEFICIALLY.  The fact that  UQS has permitted SJC to hold out that ARW is a part of SJC, when it is NOT, means that UQ could bear the major portion of the multi million dollar damages.   This begs the question: Why has UQ done such a big favour for the BDAC; a favour amounting to over $60,000 per annum?  Financially, ARW is beneficialy to both.   UQ paid nothing for a beneficially interest in ARW, and while BDAC funded the purchase, with the RIP-OFF RETURNS APPROVED BY UQ, [of more than $60,000 pa], the capital expended by BDAC was recouped in about three years.  Now they are making MONEY FOR NOTHING, but then that is all that concerns Morgan.

There is much CORRUPTION in Australia but the majority of it is concealed. THIS HAS MAJOR CONSEQUENCES FOR AUSTRALIA POLICICALLY ON the WORLD STAGE. Australia attempts to pontificate from the HIGH MORAL GROUND and be the “BULLY OF THE PACIFIC”. America [USA – Bush] is attempting to diminish its INTERNATIONAL crimes by seeming to associate with a densizen of the “high moral ground” [Australia], whereas in fact, AUSTRALIA IS RIFE WITH CORRUPTION. The hidden corruption is spread across layers of government, [elected and “public service”], POLICE, [Queensland and Federal], the judiciary, legal profession, EDUCATION, UNIVERSITIES and business. It occurs in many dimensions. Much of the corruption is for the “cover-up” of incompetence, and other corruption. Some members of my “family” have gained some “inspiration” from some of this corruption, utilising corruption in the legal profession and judiciary.          
The www is the ideal medium to present The EVIDENCE of this corruption when that evidence is documented and the statements of others where those statements are public records. I WILL PUBLISH THE FACTUAL EVIDENCE HERE. My purpose with this site is to assemble that evidence and the logical linkage for the UNCHALLENGABLE CONCLUSION. I have special skills in this respect. I am first and foremost a MATHEMATICIAN with maths majors in my BSc and BA. As well, I am fully trained to be admitted as a lawyer. I have practical experience in many courts over many years and as an accountant and tax agent.



Quick Access

Who is "HAIG"?
HAIG concerns:
 Contents/Sitemap    SEARCH this site
Opt-In Emails/ SIGN UP.
Contact HAIG
The "Judges are Corrupt" [WorldWide] Network
Tertiary Education in Australia Recycling to save the Earth Water stupidity in Australia.
English as a Second Language for Chinese.
Interests for Chinese People
Coaching/Consulting


Due to FRAUD by St John's College [SJC]
 
on the St Lucia Campus [SLC] of
 
The University of Queensland [UQ]









All "residents" of SJC, who have been conned and then required to reside "off-campus" in  the "Anglican's Rabbit Warren" [ARW], most likely have a damages claim againt BOTH UQ and BDAC, for not only the accommodation charge they paid to be a resident of SJC, but also for damages for any losses that relocation of them by SJC caused.  For instance, any inferior performance in any UQ exams or assessments could be laid at the feet of  SJC.  The total of just the refunds of College fees for the time "residents" were forced to stay at ARW, would amount to millions of dollars.  In addition, the additional aggravated adn exemplary damages caused by being forced to stay at the ARW, could amount to many millions more.  The health problems and concerns cause by the fact that the ARW is an ASBESTOS RIDDEN HOVEL.

































































CORRUPTION EXPOSED










fffffff







ggggg









hhhhh










eeeeeee