I am disabled; according to the law.

[go to HAIG REPORT home]
new My writing disability due to hyper-extended right thumb: a partial loss of a bodily function, as per definition of disability in DDA.

By the Commonwealth's Disability Discrimination Act 1992 [DDA], I have multiple disabilities. These being my Obstructive Sleep Apnoea [OSA], and, related to that and my concussion injury in 1967, my brain damage and clinically significant atrophy and my deformed skull and resulting disfigurement and gross ugliness. I am presently in receipt of the Disability Support Pension. I could not be entitled unless I was disabled. I hope to earn sufficient income such that I will be able to forego that pension at some time in the future, but I will still be diaabled. Psychology professionals advise me that although I am now overcoming some of my ill-health, I will always be disabled due to the permanent damage I have suffered.

By Section 4 Interpretation: for definitions:

"disability, in relation to a person, means:
                     (a) total or partial loss of the person’s bodily or mental functions; or
                     (b) total or partial loss of a part of the body; or
                     (c) the presence in the body of organisms causing disease or illness; or
                     (d) the presence in the body of organisms capable of causing disease or illness; or
                     (e) the malfunction, malformation or disfigurement of a part of the person’s body; or
                      (f) a disorder or malfunction that results in the person learning differently from a person without the disorder or malfunction; or
                     (g) a disorder, illness or disease that affects a person’s thought processes, perception of reality, emotions or judgment or that results in disturbed behaviour;
and includes a disability that:
                     (h) presently exists; or
                      (i) previously existed but no longer exists; or
                      (j) may exist in the future; or
                     (k) is imputed to a person.

So many parts of that definition apply to me. These being the brain damage and atrophy, [(a), (b), (f), (g), and (h)], and my deformed skull and resulting disfigurement and gross ugliness [(e) and (h)].

Now, that means I come under the provisions of the DDA. By Section 109 of the Australian Constitution which reads:

Section109 Inconsistency of laws
When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.

Hence, when a matter is provided for under the DDA, it matters not a skerrik that a State law may suggest an inconstency with the DDA. This means the DDA provides for my assistance DOGS [plural]. despite the Queensland Guide Dogs Act and the NSW Companion Animals Act.

BULLIES OUTED!

While writing this page I googled for a definition of BULLY or BULLYING, to find "most people only realise they're being bullied when they read this page",

The Bully Online website published by the UK National Workplace Bullying Advice Line. The site is extensive and detailed.

In time I will name all of the bullies and link them to specific pages on this site.

Some TACTICS and STRATEGIES of BULLYING.

The DYNAMICS of the BULLYING to which I am subjected, and the reasons for it.

For so long I did not realise that I was being bullied. I just realised I was being attacked often. Others had suggested that as I was the comon denominator, it must be something about me; something that I was doing. That seemed logical to me. I looked hard and long at myself to try to understand. [In fact it was DIRECTLY RELATED TO ME but was not of my volition AND was completely beyond my control: view my MRI. In my High School years, I was known as a brain. I was then very intelligent, especially with mathematics. I had come to the conclusion that it must be that I was causing others to be jealous of me. It was intimated that I should conceal my intelligence. I withdrew into myself. I was still bullied.

It is only recently, [2005] that I obtained that MRI to show the actual case, unequivocally.

There are TWO BASIC CAUSES OF THE BULLYING I SUSTAIN: They are not independent but are interrelated and correlated.

1.)   The asymmetry/freakishish-ugliness of my deformed skull and resulting disfigurement.
2.)   Most importantly, the consequences of 1. above:-
    a)   Shark attack whereby gutless parasites, see me as being an "easy target" for their bullying, as it make them feel superior to me.
    b)   My undeserved "reputation" or, in psychology speak, the 'halo effect' [similar to "where there's smoke there's fire"], which is a consequence of 1. and 2a. above. This is especially so when a third party has to make decision regarding me: for example, Public servant parasites in the Public Sector, and for Magistrates and Judges [where they are not already out and out corrupt - the case with many]. This is so even where they do not see me but just "read between the lines" on my reputation and the demonisation of me, by other bullies.

Research shows that Ugly people are so much more harshly treated by courts, much the same as with Aborigines. Aborigines are bullied, just for being Aborigines. The discrimination I suffer is very similar to Racial discrimination. Hence, I readily appreciate how Aborigines, and people of PNG and Solomon Islands experience Racial discrimination [simply bullying].

Morgan
Anglican Church
Hughie
The University of Queensland [UQ]
     UQ's Registrar, Douglas Porter
     UQ's Vice Chancellor, Prof John Hay
Brisbane City Council [BCC] Corruption, breaking, entering and stealing, illegal imprisonment, CRUELTY TO ANIMALS.
    Garth Steven Donnelly, cheater, nominally employed by BCC. Should he be in jail for PERJURY? You decide. Why did he PANIC?.
     Is Gaylene Vivian another LIAR at BCC?
    The EVIDENCE that the Queensland Information Commissions states that the SOLICITOR for BCC is a LIAR.

Some TACTICS and STRATEGIES of BULLYING
Bullying involves demonisation of the target with lies of evil, wrongdoing or immoral conduct. When challenged, the bully cannot substantiate his allegations but may say that the person who can deliver the evidence is afraid of repercussions from the bullied target [helps to substantiate the lie], that the target was challenged [in private but was not challenged, or was challenged, because the bully had included that, planning his bullying, as a way of substantiating the lie that the conduct occurred, when the target admits that he was challenged], and that the challenge was worthwhile because the target no longer engages in that conduct. [I am pleased you don't beat your wife now.]

There is much CORRUPTION in Australia but the majority of it is concealed. THIS HAS MAJOR CONSEQUENCES FOR AUSTRALIA POLICICALLY ON the WORLD STAGE. Australia attempts to pontificate from the HIGH MORAL GROUND and be the “BULLY OF THE PACIFIC”. America [USA – Bush] is attempting to diminish its INTERNATIONAL crimes by seeming to associate with a densizen of the “high moral ground” [Australia], whereas in fact, AUSTRALIA IS RIFE WITH CORRUPTION. The hidden corruption is spread across layers of government, [elected and “public service”], POLICE, [Queensland and Federal], the judiciary, legal profession, EDUCATION, UNIVERSITIES and business. It occurs in many dimensions. Much of the corruption is for the “cover-up” of incompetence, and other corruption. Some members of my “family” have gained some “inspiration” from some of this corruption, utilising corruption in the legal profession and judiciary.
The www is the ideal medium to present The EVIDENCE of this corruption when that evidence is documented and the statements of others where those statements are public records. I WILL PUBLISH THE FACTUAL EVIDENCE HERE. My purpose with this site is to assemble that evidence and the logical linkage for the UNCHALLENGABLE CONCLUSION. I have special skills in this respect. I am first and foremost a MATHEMATICIAN with maths majors in my BSc and BA. As well, I am fully trained to be admitted as a lawyer. I have practical experience in many courts over many years and as an accountant and tax agent.

Quick Access

Who is "HAIG"?
HAIG concerns:
Contents/Sitemap SEARCH this site
Opt-In Emails/ SIGN UP.
Contact HAIG
The "Judges are Corrupt" [WorldWide] Network
Tertiary Education in Australia Recycling to save the Earth Water stupidity in Australia.
English as a Second Language for Chinese.
Interests for Chinese People
Coaching/Consulting

By Section 4 Interpretation: for definitions:

hhhhh

I am disabled according to the law.

[go to HAIG REPORT home frames]
By the Commonwealth's Disability Discrimination Act 1992 [DDA], I have multiple disabilities. These being my Obstructive Sleep Apnoea [OSA], and, related to that and my concussion injury in 1967, my brain damage and clinically significant atrophy and my deformed skull and resulting disfigurement and gross ugliness. I am presently in receipt of the Disability Support Pension. I could not be entitled unless I was disabled. I hope to earn sufficient income such that I will be able to forego that pension at some time in the future, but I will still be diaabled. Psychology professionals advise me that although I am now overcoming some of my ill-health, I will always be disabled due to the permanent damage I have suffered.

By Section 4 Interpretation: for definitions:
"disability, in relation to a person, means:
                     (a) total or partial loss of the person’s bodily or mental functions; or
                     (b) total or partial loss of a part of the body; or
                     (c) the presence in the body of organisms causing disease or illness; or
                     (d) the presence in the body of organisms capable of causing disease or illness; or
                     (e) the malfunction, malformation or disfigurement of a part of the person’s body; or
                      (f) a disorder or malfunction that results in the person learning differently from a person without the disorder or malfunction; or
                     (g) a disorder, illness or disease that affects a person’s thought processes, perception of reality, emotions or judgment or that results in disturbed behaviour;
and includes a disability that:
                     (h) presently exists; or
                      (i) previously existed but no longer exists; or
                      (j) may exist in the future; or
                     (k) is imputed to a person.
So many parts of that definition apply to me. These being the brain damage and atrophy, [(a), (b), (f), (g), and (h)], and my deformed skull and resulting disfigurement and gross ugliness [(e) and (h)].

Now, that means I come under the provisions of the DDA. By Section 109 of the Australian Constitution which reads:
["Section109 Inconsistency of laws

When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid."],
when a matter is provided for under the DDA, it matters not a skerrik that a State law may suggest an inconstency with the DDA. This means the DDA provides for my assistance DOGS [plural]. despite the Queensland Guide Dogs Act and the NSW Companion Animals Act.

[go to HAIG REPORT home frames]