NB: How to defend yourself against an RSPCA ATTACK:
RSPCA = Rip-off Scum Pretending to Champion Animals

Vicki Lomax, RSPCA whore and parasite masquerading as a Vet.  Vicki Lomax, RSPCA whore and parasite masquerading as a Vet.
[Incompetent and  compromised 'vets' are  essential for the rspca practice of FABRICATING EVIDENCE.]

Her 'VET' REPORT, from a supposed EXPERT WITNESS is a complete OBJECTIVE FRAUD and

 Vicki Lomax, RSPCA whore for hire and parasite masquerading as a Vet is at the yolk of a CRIMINAL SCANDAL of massive proportions, that will rock the rspca everywhere in Australia, AND SHOULD DESTROY IT IN QUEENSLAND.  The rspca and the Pine Rivers Shire Council [PRSC] have, together with the QUEENSLAND STATE GOVERNMENT [DPI&F], engaged in CRIMINAL MANIPULATION and wicked ABUSE OF THE COURT AND JUSTICE SYSTEM, all aimed at destroying the lives of two retirees.

THE OBJECTIVE DEMOLITION OF HER REPORTS:   The Vicki Lomax whore for hire, wrote two reports dated 20070904 and 20080114, for the rspca and PRSC. 
Her ignorant or deliberate mishandling of poultry cage sizes, in such a PUBLIC WAY, DESTROYS HER CREDIBILITY COMPLETELY.   Vicki Lomax is obsessed with irrelevancies.   She repeatedly returns to "height" of the "roofing" of the "cages". She is completely ignorant of the legal requirements for the keeping of Domestic Poultry/fowl.  Relevantly, there exists, a Model code of practice for the welfare of animals—Domestic poultry 4th Edition, and specifically. ACPA2001 Regulation which specifies the MINIMUM  dimensions of cages for domestic fowl.  

I now address all the parasites that have been attacking this retired couple. That includes, Vicki Lomax, Mayor of the PRSC, Yvonne Chapman, Criminal Councillor Bob Miller, Mark John McBride, Robyn Julie Moffat, Ann-Marie Boyd,  all of PRSC  plus Shane Towers-Hammond, and Gwen Kate Heaton, [Katie Heaton] [Gwen Heaton], of the rspca. All of the poultry cages owned by your targets that you intended to make victims , exceed the legislated standard.  As well, with the cages they had, the retired couple could have accommodated more than SIXTEEN TIMES THE NUMBER OF "CHOOKS" THEY ACTUALLY HAD.

On the figures of Vicki Lomax, the couple had 25 - 50 "chooks".   Applying the legislated formula to the floor area of the cages, the retired couple's cages were sufficient to accommodate over 800 fully grown "chooks".

The fact that everyone from the Mayor of the PRSC, Yvonne Chapman, plus Bob Millar, Mark John McBride, Robyn Julie Moffat, Ann-Marie Boyd,  all of PRSC to the rspca including Shane Towers-Hammond, and Gwen Kate Heaton, [Kate Heaton] [Gwen Heaton], would have known of the fraudulent reports, means you  are ALL CULPABLE.   Claiming ignorance of the law is no excuse IN LAW.  On the PR front, NO-ONE would believe that any one of you, let alone, EVERY ONE, of you did not know this aspect of the law, since the changes in the legislated minimum size of poultry cages, being an increase in the minimum size of cages for poultry, was so well covered in the media, in recent years.  Google will ensure that you all receive the publicity you deserve. Take the HaigReport Google challenge and the FODuckman Google challenge.

Vicki Lomax's dedication to detail is a matter of wonderment.  She states at the beginning of her first report that the property was "home to approximately 6 - 12 geese and 25 - 50 chooks."  This report was dated the day after she was there.  In that report, she observed under the heading "Poultry":  "The poultry was not examined individually due to time constraints, however the housing is totally inadequate.  With the chooks, the aim should be to cut down the numbers, increase the size of the pens to allow adequate exercise, raise the height of the roofs (sic) and make allowances for free ranging."  This statement was after she had admitted, "..an exact number of the poultry would be hard to determine unless every cage was examined and the poultry removed."  
In her second report,
she, Vicki Lomax, states that she, Vicki Lomax, was responsible for the decision whereby rspca seized all of the "chooks".  Vicki Lomax listed the "issue" re "cages" for their seizure thus:  "extremely poor housing of birds, including very low roofing ..."  
Vicki Lomax, the rspca and the PRSC  intended her  documents/reports to be legal documents.  Then why is she making such ridiculous and contradictory statements.  So much of her "reports" is unmitigated nonsense.  It is a SCANDAL of mammoth proportions, that Vicki Lomax's reports of veritable humbug has been used to persecute this retired couple through repeated callovers in the Petrie magistrates court, being forced to deal with the rspca bullies Gwen Kate Heaton and Shane Towers-Hammond for a whole day at a time, once every fortnight.  Then we have the  PRSC persecution of the retired couple in the Petrie Magistrates Court.  On each occasion the PRSC have abused and wasted the time of a magistrate.  This has been an abuse of the magistrate.  
The legislation, statute and regulation, speaks of "cages" and "sheds".  Vicki Lomax speaks interchangably of "cages" and "pens".   Only Lomax knows the specifics of what are "pens".   The ACPA2001 Regulation defines shed thus: "shed: means a structure of any kind that has a roof and walls and is used to keep domestic fowl."  That is the full definition of "shed".  It states nothing as to the extent of the walls or roof for that matter, or importantly their dimensions. 
The legislation speaks of floor area in square metres for various total kilogram weights of birds and the height of cages in centimetres.   Nowhere does she show the dimensions of any of the many "cages" or "pens" of which she complains.    IN FACT, SHE DOES NOT KNOW AS SHE DID NOT MEASURE ANY CAGES.  In fact the couple have 23 cages for their domestic fowl.
Because the minimum floor area of cage per bird and  the mimimum height of cages is specified in the legislation, such are not matters upon which her "expert" knowledge is relevant.   If she wishes to argue against the determination of public servants in the specifics of the regulation, she is at liberty to do that, but that is a separate and different matter.   Clearly, the only intention of Vicki Lomax, whore for hire, was to be instrumental in persecuting the retired couple, and stealing their possessions, and thus assisting to destroy then .  Maybe, the whore for hire, Vicki Lomax
The RAMIFICATIONS are INTERNATIONAL. Vicki Lomax, [she calls herself Dr V Lomax in professional veterinary journals], says she is engaged in "Animal Research" at The University of Queensland  [UQ].  These revelations of her professional incompetence and her involvement in CRIMINAL FRAUD, will be considered unfavourably by the International Veterinary community,  the peer body for review of any publications re animal research.   Her name will be poison.  Other veterinary researchers will not want anything to do with her, and will definitey not want her anywhere near any research they are doing.  While UQ,  through its governing body, the UQ Senate, is under the control of the corrupt Queensland labor Government, the UQ senate would not be much concerned with "political fraud", but researcher in the veterinary field, will be more concerned.  This will increase the slide of UQ down the rankings for Research Universities, begun 12 years ago.

Vicki Lomax's adverse criticisms are speculation.  Consider her specific references: re the teeth of the dogs, "In general, the dental health was excellent, probably due to the large number of bones which the dogs were given in the form of cows heads and leg bones including hooves."   Did she consider that it was due to the care and husbandry for the dogs by the owners?  Did she wonder how the dogs came by these bones?  Clearly, the whore had the rspca "mind set".

LOMAX CHOSE TO PASS JUDGEMENT ON MATTERS OF WHICH SHE HAD NO EXPERTESE.  Given her major blunder in passing her subjective "opinion" on matters of  legislated values, [the size of poultry cages], this would suggest her total ignorance of what she was doing and suggest professional incompetence.  Much of her two reports was mere speculation.
Consider her final paragraph [and poor vocabulary]:  "Reducing the numbers right down .... the owners could spend more time maintaining their property and getting their lives into a more manageable situation."   Was that her "expert opinion"?   The Animal Care and Protection Act 2001 [ACPA] specifically excludes humans [the owners] from classification as "animals".  She is [purportedly] a vet: animals not humans, you dumb whore.

The TARGET of the VENDETTA by the parasites on this occasion:
The target of the present parasites including Bob Millar, elected labor Councillor for Division 1 of the Pine Rivers Shire Council, is a retired, harmless but fit couple, living on their own 40 acre freehold hobby farm block [majority pristine rainforest] at Ocean View, between Dayboro and Mount Mee in South East Queensland, in his Division 1. The couple are very much "loners" and so do not have a support network to assist them defend the  fraudulent and bully attacks. Bob Millar has directed this VENDETTA for the benefit of his criminal mates, some living in the area.
Criminal Bob Millar was elected in 2000.  In 2001, he tried to destroy the retired couple, by having their sturdy and substantial home, a relocated church building,  bulldozed.  At the last minute, his actions were thwarted.  
Incidents in his [and others] VENDETTA continued and culminated last year when Criminal Bob Millar managed to have the retirees, his constituents, face the combined criminal attack of his Pine Rivers Shire Council and the  rspca. The intention again, still, was to destroy the couple.  The point of the attack was the animals lovingly and well husbanded and fed by the couple.
This required the rspca, to, in its inimitable way, to set up these peaseful retirees.   The method chosen was an adverse veterinary report.   The person chosen for this "job" was the rspca whore and parasite, Vicky Lomax.

Firstly, we will publish the pertinent excerpt from the relevant Queensland Legislation.   The FULL Statute, called the Animal Care and Protection Act 2001, Reprinted as in force on 21 July 2006, Reprint No. 2C revised edition is freely available online from the Queensland Government  website at http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/CURRENT/A/AnimalCaPrA01.pdf /

Chapter 6:      Investigation and enforcement
Part 1 Inspectors
Division 1 Appointment
114 Appointment and qualifications
(1) The chief executive may appoint an individual as an inspector.
(2) However, an individual may be appointed as an inspector only if—
(a) the individual is—
 (i) a public service officer or employee; or

 (ii) employed by the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Queensland Incorporated; or

(iii) included in a class of individuals declared under a regulation to be an approved class of persons for this section; and
(b) the chief executive is satisfied the individual has—
(i) the necessary expertise or experience to be an inspector; or
(ii) satisfactorily finished training approved by the chief executive.
(3) Subsection (2) does not limit the issues the chief executive may consider when deciding whether to appoint an individual as an inspector.
115 Functions
The functions of an inspector are to investigate and enforce compliance with this Act.
116 Appointment conditions and limit on powers
(1) An inspector holds office on any conditions stated in—
(a) the inspector’s instrument of appointment; or
(b) a signed notice given to the inspector; or
(c) a regulation.
(2) Without limiting subsection (1), the instrument of appointment, a signed notice given to the inspector or a regulation may—
(a) limit the inspector’s functions or powers under this or another Act; or
(b) require the inspector to give the chief executive stated information or a report about the performance of the inspector’s functions or the exercise of the inspector’s powers.
(3) In this section—
signed notice means a notice signed by the chief executive.

117 When inspector ceases to hold office
(1) An inspector ceases to hold office if any of the following happens—
(a) the term of office stated in a condition of office ends;
(b) under another condition of office, the inspector ceases to hold office;
(c) the inspector’s resignation under section 118 takes effect.

(2) Subsection (1) does not limit the ways an inspector may cease to hold office.

(3) In this section—
condition of office means a condition on which the inspector holds office.
118 Resignation
(1) An inspector may resign by signed notice given to the chief executive.
(2) However, if holding office as an inspector is a condition of the
inspector holding another office, the inspector may not resign as an inspector without resigning from the other office.


Watch for our upcoming

In Queensland, my home state, the RSPCA has statutory powers to enter the homes of people without court orders, and WITHOUT GIVING THOSE PEOPLE DUE PROCESS.

The other states of Australia have similar legislation. This gives the parasites in RSPCA uniforms, powers far in excess of what their abilities should suggest.  Invariably, then, the RSPCA attracts the mentally feeble who have been bullied and victimised as kids because they were, and still are, dumb or dyslectic, and who in turn relish the power this legislation gives them, and so become bullies themselves, on a grand scale.

I have a few pages about the problems caused to me by theRSPCA parasites, and the actions that I have taken to deal with these parasites.  Fortunately, so many of my pages have very high Google rankings.   I find many people from the UK landing on my pages about the RSPCA.  I will now direct them to their own special page.  For a while after I write this [21 January, 2008], this will probably be the way that they land on that page.  Google may soon direct UK people directly to that page.  [There are links below to most of those pages to which Google directs them at present.]

I believe there is a solution to the problem of corruption and bullying by the RSPCA, in both Australia and the UK.   As well, beginning with Queensland, followed by the other states of Australia, we wish to ENSURE that the Parliaments in each state, STRIP each state RSPCA body of its STATUTORY POWERS. 

I hope we, in Australia and the UK, can assist each other to help bring the RSPCA in Australia and the UK, to 'heel'.   I understand from following the links in the Google searches which produced the links people followed to my pages:[the "Referer"], that the RSPCA is without similar legislative powers in the UK.    Apparently, this does not make them any less parasitic than they are in Australia. 

If you like my suggested solution, please let me know by emailing me from my PHP email form.


ALERT EMAIL [20061221] to Tim Mulherin, DPI & F, and Elizabeth Nosworthy AO re RSPCA requirement that my DUCKS MUST HAVE A SWIMMING POOL.

Elizabeth Nosworthy AO
Chair of the Queensland Water Commission

Minister for Primary Industries and Fisheries
The Honourable Tim Mulherin

Thursday, December 21, 2006

Dear Madam,
Dear Sir,

Today, I have published on my website HAIGREPORT.com /, an OPEN LETTER addressed to you both.  It involves a matter within the provinces of you both.  The URL for this OPEN LETTER [20061221] to Tim Mulherin, DPI & F, and Elizabeth Nosworthy AO re RSPCA requirement that my DUCKS MUST HAVE A SWIMMING POOL is http://haigreport.com/openletter20061221dpiandwatercommrerspcaducksswimmingpool.html /.

This matter is extremely serious and I demand your timely and undivided attention, as the RSPCA is attempting to set me up as being unco-operative, and threatening me with a fine of $22,500.00.

I think this will be of major interest to many Queenslanders. This website is VERY public. I challenge you to take the HAIGREPORT GOOGLE CHALLENGE.  My site has a high google ranking and it is improving daily.

Other relevant  URLs [hypertext-links] include:
OPEN LETTER [20061221] to Tim Mulherin, DPI & F, and Elizabeth Nosworthy AO re RSPCA requirement that my DUCKS MUST HAVE A SWIMMING POOL.
RSPCA REPLY of 11 December, 2006.
OPEN LETTER [20061211] to Qld MLAs re RSPCA Qld and my response to Chaplin's.
OPEN LETTER [20061211] to RSPCA Qld. My response to Chaplin's.
RSPCA REPLY of 4 December, 2006.
OPEN LETTER [dated 1st December, 2006] to RSPCA Qld  
RSPCA Method of Operation - FRAUDULENT and CRIMINAL

I am definite that I do not wish to be pleasing the RSPCA yet run FOWL  of another collection of public sector parasites.  Please acknowledge receipt of the OPEN LETTER and this ALERT EMAIL I am forwarding to you both, ALERTING you to the existence of that OPEN LETTER.

Kind regards,
 Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc LLB BA      
ex-Member of the Standing Committee of Convocation of 
 254 Hawken Drive, St Lucia Q4067. 
 Skype: russellmathews
 Ph: NONE:I've given TELSTRA the FLICK. Hooray![Just email or Skype me.]
 Email:  ????   HAIG REPORT: the EVIDENCE
International students BEWARE of Australian universities
The "Judges are Corrupt" [WorldWide] Network.[members' links]




While writing this page I googled for a definition of BULLY or BULLYING, to find "most people only realise they're being bullied when they read this page",


The Bully Online website published by the UK National Workplace Bullying Advice Line.  The site is extensive and detailed.

In time I will name all of the bullies and link them to specific pages on this site.


The DYNAMICS of the BULLYING to which I am subjected, and the reasons for it.

For so long I did not realise that I was being bullied. I just realised I was being attacked often.  Others had suggested that as I was the comon denominator, it must be something about me; something that I was doing. That seemed logical to me. I looked hard and long at myself to try to understand. [In fact it was DIRECTLY RELATED TO ME but was not of my volition AND was completely beyond my control: view my MRI.  In my High School years, I was known as a brain.  I was then very intelligent, especially with mathematics.   I had come to the conclusion that it must be that I was causing others to be jealous of me.  It was intimated that I should conceal my intelligence.   I withdrew into myself. I was still bullied.

It is only recently, [2005] that I obtained that MRI to show the actual case, unequivocally. 

There are TWO BASIC CAUSES OF THE BULLYING I SUSTAIN:  They are not independent but are interrelated and correlated.

1.)   The asymmetry/freakishish-ugliness of my deformed skull and resulting disfigurement. 
2.)   Most importantly, the consequences of 1. above:-
    a)   Shark attack whereby gutless parasites, see me as being an "easy target"  for their bullying, as it make them feel superior to me.
    b)   My undeserved "reputation" or, in psychology speak, the 'halo effect' [similar to "where there's smoke there's fire"], which is a consequence of 1. and 2a. above.  This is especially so when a third party has to make decision regarding me: for example, Public servant parasites in the Public Sector, and for Magistrates and Judges [where they are not already out and out corrupt - the case with many].  This is so even where they do not see me but just "read between the lines" on my reputation and the demonisation of me, by other bullies.

Research shows that Ugly people are so much more harshly treated by courts, much the same as with Aborigines.  Aborigines are bullied, just for being Aborigines.  The discrimination I suffer is very similar to Racial discrimination.  Hence, I readily appreciate how Aborigines, and people of PNG and Solomon Islands experience Racial discrimination [simply bullying]. 


Anglican Church
The University of Queensland [UQ]
     UQ's Registrar, Douglas Porter 
     UQ's Vice Chancellor, Prof John Hay
Brisbane City Council [BCC] Corruption, breaking, entering and stealing, illegal imprisonment, CRUELTY TO ANIMALS.
Garth Steven Donnelly, cheater, nominally employed by BCC.  Should he be in jail for PERJURY?  You decide.  Why did he PANIC?. 
     Is Gaylene Vivian another LIAR at BCC?
    The EVIDENCE that the Queensland Information Commissions states that the SOLICITOR  for BCC is a LIAR.

Bullying involves demonisation of the target with lies of  evil, wrongdoing or immoral conduct.   When challenged, the bully cannot substantiate his allegations but may say that the person who can deliver the evidence is afraid of repercussions from the bullied target [helps to substantiate the lie], that the target was challenged [in private but was not challenged, or was challenged, because the bully had included that, planning his bullying, as a way of substantiating the lie that the conduct occurred, when the target admits that he was challenged],  and that the challenge was worthwhile because the target no longer engages in that conduct.  [I am pleased you don't beat your wife now.]

There is much CORRUPTION in Australia but the majority of it is concealed. THIS HAS MAJOR CONSEQUENCES FOR AUSTRALIA POLICICALLY ON the WORLD STAGE. Australia attempts to pontificate from the HIGH MORAL GROUND and be the BULLY OF THE PACIFIC”. America [USA – Bush] is attempting to diminish its INTERNATIONAL crimes by seeming to associate with a densizen of the “high moral ground” [Australia], whereas in fact, AUSTRALIA IS RIFE WITH CORRUPTION. The hidden corruption is spread across layers of government, [elected and “public service”], POLICE, [Queensland and Federal], the judiciary, legal profession, EDUCATION, UNIVERSITIES and business. It occurs in many dimensions. Much of the corruption is for the “cover-up” of incompetence, and other corruption. Some members of my “family” have gained some “inspiration” from some of this corruption, utilising corruption in the legal profession and judiciary.          
The www is the ideal medium to present The EVIDENCE of this corruption when that evidence is documented and the statements of others where those statements are public records. I WILL PUBLISH THE FACTUAL EVIDENCE HERE. My purpose with this site is to assemble that evidence and the logical linkage for the UNCHALLENGABLE CONCLUSION. I have special skills in this respect. I am first and foremost a MATHEMATICIAN with maths majors in my BSc and BA. As well, I am fully trained to be admitted as a lawyer. I have practical experience in many courts over many years and as an accountant and tax agent.

Quick Access

Who is "HAIG"?
HAIG concerns:
    SEARCH this site
Opt-In Emails/ SIGN UP.
Contact HAIG

The "Judges are Corrupt" [WorldWide] Network
Tertiary Education in Australia
Recycling to save the Earth Water stupidity in Australia.
English as a Second Language for Chinese.
Interests for Chinese People